| Revision as of 12:44, 22 June 2009 editEusebeus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,667 edits →Haydn Symphonies: tx to Casliber← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,932 edits →Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (353 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Message | |||
| {{Notice|Deja Messages Ici Bitte. I will generally respond to any comments, queries, calumnies or complaints here. Whatever you do, ]}} | |||
| | bgcolor = #gray | |||
| | border-color = #black | |||
| | color = #black | |||
| | linkcolor = #orange | |||
| }} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] |
#] | ||
| #] | |||
| #]}} | |||
| == January 2023 == | |||
| == Piano Sonata in B-flat minor (Reubke) == | |||
| (X-posted from ] | |||
| David | |||
| I wikified ]. Never heard it, never even heard of it, but I highly doubt this chordal sequence: ''i, bII6, viio7, i4-3, v, VI6/4, viio7 (spelled enharmonically as a diminished seventh of Abb minor) and finally V'' Am I reading that correctly - the enharmonic spelling of A double flat minor?? Surely not. ] (]) 19:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from ] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> ] ] 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I have no idea about the funny chord progression. I've never heard of the work or the composer either. I just moved it from ] because that was far too generic a page title. A user named "Lisztener" created the page and most of its content. A quick google search says that "viio7" is the "leading-tone diminished seventh chord" and a check of ] shows all sorts of double and triple flats, so its possible, especially starting with a key that already has five flats. But to tell you the truth, I knew nothing about the chord before the google search. You'd have to ask a harmony expert.] (]) 19:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| : I will address this on ] momentarily. --] (]) 01:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''. | |||
| Julius Reubke received his early musical training from Hermann Bonicke in Quedlinburg. Among other works, he produced his "Trio in E flat" during this time. He entered the Berlin Conservatory in 1851, where he studied piano with Kullak and composition with Bernhard Marx. He was considered the school's most gifted student and composed works fluently written in the keyboard style of Chopin during this time. After a short period of teaching piano at the conservatory, he went to Weimar to study with Liszt, where he became one of Liszt's favorite pupils. His two most important works, written in 1857, were the "Piano Sonata in B flat minor" and the "Organ Sonata in C minor." Both works were admired by members of the Weimar circle, and Liszt regarded Reubke as a composer of promise. He moved to Dresden in 1857 and joined the Dresden Tonkunstlerverein, participating as a pianist in their concerts. He died in June of that year. His organ sonata, an instrumental setting of a psalm text, is considered one of the truest manifestations of Romantic thought, and it represents one of the high points of nineteenth century organ literature. His early death left his considerable promise unfulfilled. ~ Lynn Vought, All Music Guide ] (]) 16:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. | |||
| Please see more information at ]. | |||
| == December 2008 == | |||
| When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please do not add what may appear to be ] content to Misplaced Pages{{#if:Talk:Arch Coal|, as you did to ]}}. If you would like to experiment please use the ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> ''Please ensure that you do not defame people or organizations, intentionally or unintentionally by making unsourced characterizations.'' ] (]) 22:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == Woodward effect AFD == | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| , I updated myself from Delete to Keep. I'm not asking you to change your mind, but to just review the new sources. It could still go either way, and I have no preference in any event. It's a fairly big shift in material for an article of the size, so I just want to make sure you see it. I don't know if it's a shift in value, and am up in the air on that (like you can see from my comment). <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 22:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Woodward effect == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| See recent changes to ]. I don't think this is a fringe view: one that most experts think is idiotic. My reading is that most people who understand the concept are very skeptical, but are unwilling to completely rule it out - they don't want to look stupid if the theory is proved and the technology turns out to be practical, although they are fairly confident neither will happen. My guess is that the theory about mass variance may or may not become accepted, but will never have any practical use. I can say that because I have no scientific reputation to protect. But the real question is not whether the idea is true, but whether it is notable. Given the references, I think it is. Comments? ] (]) 00:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * After rewriting the article, I am starting to think the theory should be treated in the same way as ]'s claim to have escaped from a swamp by pulling himself up by his own hair. But the number of references and fact that people are still running experiments makes it notable. | |||
| ** I thought the Baron lifted himself back onto his horse by this method. Anyway, a strong metaphor and one I use often. I have struck my vote. ] (]) 18:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| == unitarian greetings == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| * hehehe. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ==Joyeux Noël== | |||
| ], Eusebeus. --] (]) 03:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Star of Diligence for user TTN??== | |||
| Hi - you gave user TTN an award -- TTN is a long-time vandal, endlessly going around and deleting entire articles. TTN recently deleted the article on the award-winning ] citing reason as: "Still nothing here" and redirecting to the list of Malcolm episodes. TTN has been systematically destroying the Malcolm episodes. TTN is tearing down Misplaced Pages instead of taking some effort to improve it. ] (]) 22:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Rubbish. He's a defender of the wiki against those who incessantly fight all encyclopedic standards and the most basic requirements. Take it to Jimbo or the village pump if you don't like the fact that Misplaced Pages still ''ostensibly'' is an encyclopedic project. ] (]) 02:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| Eusebeus that ''was'' cheeky...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| : Personally, I think ] was the best award. Cheekily, ] 07:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| :: <I>Au contraire</I>, Eusebeus, there are rules and policies here. Please justify TTN summarily deleting ], without consensus and without an adaquate edit summary. As the person who did the REVERT, restoring the article ("Hullaballoo Wolfowitz") wrote, "I believe edits like that must be treated as vandalism" and I agree. You call TNN a "defender of the wiki" - seems you're probably either friends with him, a deletionist, or both. Look at the number of articles created by TTN compared to the number he deleted or edited. I believe he created six. He's tearing down the work of others, sadly. Please remember "encyclopedic standards" are slightly different for online media compared to printed -- paper isn't wasted, and WP founder Jimbo agrees. Unfortunately I have better things to do than to patrol for WP vandals like TNN, so in that case he usually wins. ] (]) 00:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| == John Paul II == | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| Not sure how you feel about these type of articles, but I am impressed by folks trying to get some important figures up to FA and feel I can help a bit, though as an atheist much religious material sails over my head really. But anyway, these chaps could do with some tightening of prose, I and will have another crack at it later, but thought if we all chip in it may be of value. ] (] '''·''' ]) 12:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| Any luck on those page number for the Kammen cite? ] (]) 21:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Another one popped up that was yours... ] (]) 20:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| Any guidance on how to rework the prose? I looked over the MoS and can't find anything with the language used or tone of voice... is it too mechanical or something? That's one criticism you guys had that I just didn't get. ] (]) 03:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| ==Deletion review for ]== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> ('Obviously' not news??) ] (]) 21:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| == South Park episode list == | |||
| ] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I saw your work on the episode list for Farscape episodes against considerable resistance. I was proposing to merge the episodes of South Park season 1 into a more manageable list of episodes, would you mind giving an opinion on the ] concerned. ] (]) 10:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Check out the more encyclopedic rewrite. Remember, this is still really a "stub" for a larger article which having the stub there enables. -] (]) 02:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification == | |||
| Just to let you know that you've been mentioned by me at ]. Cheers, ] (]) 15:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette_alerts#Use_of_the_word_.22Spastic.22 == | |||
| www.pinkzebrashop.com <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Ah - I guess you were just archiving that discussing as I clicked 'edit' and added . I didn't notice the change to the page between my reading it, and my adding the comment. | |||
| I'm not happy with the outcome, as no action has resulted; whilst I have no intention of causing argument for the sake of argument, I do feel strongly enough about the issue to request further input. I feel that enough people agreed with my views, within the discussion, to warrant further debate. Where would you suggest I could ask for further advice? --<small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">]]</span></small> 17:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry to have cut out your comment. I doubt you'll find much consensus and just a lot more back and forth, so the best thing is probably to let it go. I don't think the comment was intended in an uncivil way. If you feel very strongly, you can always consider AN/I. ] (]) 18:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Haydn Symphonies == | |||
| I see now that the largest opponent to all the small sections was exposed for running a sock farm that you are putting all the little sections back. I actually don't mind merging them if they are really small. It looks a bit silly if the lead is just a single sentence. Surveying other composers articles, composition date usually goes in the lead section. Instrumentation could be the lead sentence of the movements section. My two cents. | |||
| The Haydn 98 note on the keyboard solo should be easy to find. Its the one thing that's always mentioned in the program notes about the work. Gotta be in Steinberg for sure. The Landon London volume is always checked out of the library. I'll add that when I get home. | |||
| I wish score excerpts were easier to find. I get spoiled by NMA for Mozart and wish they had that type of thing for more composers. For what I have done, I usually just get the notes out of Hodgson, Landon or Steinberg and use lilypond to create the image. Often some of the other language wiki's (e.g. german, french or dutch) has an image, too. That's how I found the ones for #70 and #47. Cheers. | |||
| ] (]) 14:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Yea I am going back and restoring those sections mostly b/c ''eventually'' it would be nice to include the details of the composition that are provided across HCRL and others. So I foresee expanding in most cases. Thanks for correcting my error on 39. I had written on 26 that it was an early departure from the da chiesa style, an ignorant slip up I only caught today. | |||
| ::I suppose, but something has to go in the lead and for most non-Haydn articles that's composition date. As for the note on #26, the old text was worded oddly, but I took it to mean that the movement structure didn't fit the three usual norms: italian, standard-4 movement (minuet-3 or minuet-2) or Sonata da chiesa. I think there's only a few real departures and those are #18, #25, #26 and #30... well and I suppose also #60 (and maybe #45 if you count the coda as something different). Anyhow, the unique movement structure is worth a note if you can think of a better wording. | |||
| On another matter, I keep thinking we should set up a Haydn sub-project to centralise our discussions. Probably just be you, me and Antandrus, but that s fine company to keep. But at least there would be a single place for these discussions that go back now some three years almost! Interested? ] (]) 14:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure. Tell me what page to watch. You thinking of a special wiki-sub-project or just using the talk page for ]? ] (]) 14:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah a triumvirate ain't a bad thing at all...well, not so much ] but ] ''(well, ] has sorta been inactive a wee while...)'' ...lotsa featured articles, mentioned in a Peer-reviewed journal etc. hehehe ] (] '''·''' ]) 07:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Now that's obscure. ] (]) 13:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::They are very nice plants. But quite unforgiving to grow...I don't think they'd handle Montreal winters very well....] (] '''·''' ]) 13:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Nothing handles Montreal winters very well. Next winter I'll be in Spain hopefully. Btw, do you agree with the gloss regarding your arbcom election that has been provided over ]? You greatly help reduce the friction between the various sides here (hence my urging you to run for arbcom, for what that was worth, despite your totally unacceptable inclusionist tendencies ;-) ) and I am unhappy to see your name get dragged into this kind of stuff, albeit tangentially. ] (]) 14:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I had noticed that - I do generally try and find common ground with people. Funnily enough, the divisiveness of the two sides in the trench warfare at AfD (which I thought was vast and insurmountable) was surprisingly easy to defuse with most editors involved, ''and'' rather dwarfed by some other grudges I have seen in the more central bureaucracy (or is that quagmire) where I have seen numerous ongoing exchanges and pile-ons suggesting the rather strong influence of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". An arb nomming and another opposing, that could be funny. I will have to see if I can find some common ground there I guess. | |||
| ::::PS: The arb voting was very enlightening on a number of counts, and I only figured out one oppose just recently...from (I think) a very oblique link...) Spain does sound rather fun...Madrid (great character, was surprised by how much I liked the place), or Barcelona (liked it, but smething a bit homogeneously cosmopolitan about it like SYdney or SF, still I love Sydney the best so maybe tht is not such a bad thing) ] (] '''·''' ]) 20:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Cas, thanks. I owe you one translation/copy edit of your choosing. ] (]) 12:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == dmetric returns? == | |||
| Do you really think the sock puppet is back? Maybe I assume good faith too much. ] (]) 02:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Yes, unfortunately. The use of socks to "enforce" page changes is unacceptable and if these actions persist, I'll actually bother to file a CU plus lay out the evidence in solicitation of further blocks against the sock accounts ("Tcourt" at Haydn 30 is certainly one). As for the larger point, I remain opposed to the inclusion of discography sections in the articles as unnecessary and unencyclopedic. Issues about things like the use of timpani and continuo in different recordings is more relevant, but this is one of the reasons why a Haydn/Mozart daughter project might be useful for centralised discussion. One thing is clear: we cannot countenance additions being made by sockpuppets, and the dmetric farm was one of the largest I have seen in my 3 years here. ] (]) 18:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, ], which you participated in a deletion review for a while back is undergoing another AFD, located at ]. Feel free to comment. ] (]) 20:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Heads up == | |||
| You're being discussed ], in regards to that ] articles for deletion. The creator, Spring12, seems bound and determined to belittle and discount anyone who voted delete. ] (]) 04:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry if I offended or upset you with my observations, I was just double-checking the consensus was read correctly. ] (]) 15:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Haydn-30 reference == | |||
| The new reference only includes a page number, not the actual reference. Could you fix that? Probably just a "typo". Thanks. ] (]) 18:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :On Haydn-27, you quote HCRL with the following two sentences: | |||
| :<blockquote>Robbins Landon's description of the movement, "as Italian an andante as was ever composed in Naples or Palermo" is fanciful.There is nothing particularly Italianate in its style.</blockquote> | |||
| :These seem to contradict each other. I had to return my copy of HCRL to the library, so I can't read what he wrote right now. Is there a typo in here? Could you please rephrase this a bit? Thanks. ] (]) 20:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Additional information needed on Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dmetric== | |||
| <!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-UserNotice Do not remove this comment! -->Hello. Thank you for filing ]. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a ], which indicates to ] why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, </noinclude> ] (]) 16:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| After seeing your comments at ], I was wondering if you were interested in joining the deletion discussion for ], an article which has been nominated for the same reasons. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">] | <small></small></span> 07:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC). | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Robert V. Gentry== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 06:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I would like to thank you for your participation on the AFD for this article, which is important to the quality of wikipedia (whether your opinion is in agreement with mine or not). I'd like to ask you to revisit your vote, considering ] has begun sourcing the main article to the point where I believe it establishes the topic notable enough to be discussed in major publications like Billboard, and The Hollywood Reporter, and there are likely more sources out there to be discovered. My opinion is that the main article is clearly notable, while the subarticles should be looked at on a case-by-case basis, as some may be notable, and others not. I'd appreciate you considering your vote again, based on the new sourcing. Thanks. ] (]) 15:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Why wait? == | |||
| Perhaps you should just .—](]) 02:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Tennis expert== | |||
| Were you aware that an ] was recently launched? ] (]) 02:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==WP:WAF== | |||
| My understanding is that you amended the reference to ] ino ] . This principle is currently under discussion at ] and I would be grateful for your comments about its introduction and subsequent removal. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I have ] in a neutral, encyclopedic fashion. You wrote that "If I'm wrong and he really is notable, then presumably someone other than himself will inevitably be inspired to write about him." Your comment inspired me to rewrite the article. I hope you can take a look at it and reevaluate your position at the AfD. ] (]) 08:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Haydn symphony notes == | |||
| Thanks for the kudos on the Haydn symphony quotes. As you might have guess from the edits, I've picked up a reasonably priced copy of A. P. Brown's "Symphonic Repertoire" volume pertaining to Haydn/Mozart/Beethoven/Schubert. Lots of interesting stuff in here. He writes quite a bit on *every* Symphony by those guys... (a few of Mozart's in the 20s get glossed over). Brown is really big on PTSK sonata-form notation which is pretty cool once you get the hang of it, but perhaps a bit arcane for wiki-articles. Anyhow, if your favorite symphony from those four needs more details, let me know and I'll see if Brown has anything interesting to say. ] (]) 01:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==The Dizzy article== | |||
| I restored and modified the article. My recent edits also show everybody that the character is even more important than other characters that still have articles of their own. He's prominent in merchandise and even has his own video game. | |||
| BTW, two rv were done while I was working... Actually I'm still not done. Please, start a new discussion after I'm done if you still feel like erasing it. | |||
| --] (]) 19:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I'm done. Please, notice that the merge proposal actually ended up in '''Keep''', which means the article should have '''never''' been deleted, as it was against concensus.--] (]) 20:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This AfD debate which you participated in, with 9 arguments in favor of deletion and 4 in favor of retention, was just closed by an admin as '''keep.''' I've opened a DRV on the matter here .] (]) 20:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| For collabortaing in the Spanish wikipedia, I'll check your translation of the 27th. Cheers! ] (]) 12:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Your spanish mixes some things from catalan and french. For example we never say " La historia d'este compositor". d' no exists in spanish. But the musical looks fine! ] (]) 13:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the review. I have finished 26 and will now do 49. ] (]) 13:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{done}} ] (]) 23:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I've translated until symphony #30! In Nos. 26 and 27 you made common mistakes. Key is translated as tonalidad, not clave. And Horns is trompa, not cuernos. The rest are expression mistakes I've corrected. Good job! ] (]) 01:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Adoptee seeks Mentor == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I saw your post that you are available to adopt Misplaced Pages Users, seeking adoption. I do seriously need a Mentor, and would like it if a Mentor can undertake the position of Mentoring, seriously and be available to answer emails. | |||
| If this sounds like an interesting match, please contact me. Thank you for your efforts in helping all Misplaced Pages users. | |||
| --] (]) 23:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello again, | |||
| I have just been adopted but I will contact you again should my "adoption" not work out. I appreciate your help on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| --] (]) 00:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association == | |||
| The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring (and reliably sourced) contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are - suggestions welcome. | |||
| If you wish to be elected, please notify me . If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them | |||
| Discussion is .] (]) 19:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Haydn subtitles == | |||
| The nickmnames of the symphonies appear in differents ways: in some they appear in italics and in other in bold with "", and in others just with "". Please try to adopt the same pattern for all of them. You should discuss it with another users and then change them. Thank you in advance. Cheers! ] (]) 18:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Established Editors == | |||
| Discussion of objectives ]. ] (]) 20:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
January 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jean Jullien into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher)
The article Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,