Misplaced Pages

User talk:Yachtsman1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:25, 27 June 2009 editYachtsman1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,634 edits →Removal of NPOV tag on Jonestown← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:21, 2 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,997 edits not around since Nov 2021 
(108 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=15 November 2021}}
{{archive box|]]]}}

{{userinfo}} {{userinfo}}
== September 2008 ==
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Irish_Wikipedians%27_notice_board

== What is a Legal term of Art? ==

A term of art is a precise word or phrase used by professionals in a certain subject area.

http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/tutorials/definitions/term_art.html

The expression "Legal Term of Art," therefore, means a term used by attorneys in certain areas. Thus, for example, the term "reliance" is used to express actions taken based on an "assurance" in a "contract." Reliance is not stated as "this thing I did because some guy promised me he would pay me if I did X."

The term "Detainee" fits into this category, as it defines a group of individuals who are presently being incarcerated in GITMO. They are afforded protections under the '''Detainee''' Protection Act of 2005:

http://www.milnet.com/House/HR-6166-Military%20Commisions%20Act%20of%202006/Detainee%20Treatment%20Act%20of%202005.html

The choice of verbage is not happenstance. The persons who fall under this category meet a very special definition under the law. They are not "prisoners," because they are not American Citizens, nor are the Prisoner of War. Their status is, instead, as "detainees" of the Department of Defense. Thus, they are under military detention, not afforded the status of military prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention as irregular combatants, and the term applies solely to persons meeting this definition as a class.

I can only hope this fully, and completely, explains the legal term of art "Detainee."

== Frogman ==

He missed the Greek Navy, and they are really good:

http://www.hellenicnavy.gr/dyk_history_en.asp

Use later to edit Frogman story. Consider sections carefully.

== Pontifical Roman Athenaeum Saint'Apollinare ==

New project

http://en.wikipedia.org/Pontifical_Lateran_University

== Joe McGarrity ==

http://en.wikipedia.org/Joseph_McGarrity

http://www.irishphiladelphia.com/mcgarritytimeline



== Elizabethan Stage Society ==

]

: I have moved this page to ] which is where I assume you intended it to be, and have removed the speedy deletion tag placed there now it is in your userspace. ] (]) 08:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Much Appreciated. First time I have ever started an article, and a stumble on the way is to be expected. Thanks for picking me up. Cheers.] (]) 08:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

== The Forgotten Ten ==

Mountjoy

]

]



== Battle of Great Severn ==
Link:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2242/is_1598_274/ai_54405265

http://en.wikipedia.org/Josias_Fendall

http://books.google.com/books?id=9SgUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA154&lpg=PA154&dq=Battle,+Severn,+maryland&source=web&ots=HpU-imuTj6&sig=7UQXOpBTZ_o50xiGYHDu_WQABVU&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result#PPA160,M1

http://books.google.com/books?id=cPgMAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA249&lpg=PA249&dq=Battle,+Severn,+maryland&source=web&ots=zFaHTmBiCh&sig=AjCud0eo-thOc-aBUCr1lHaMtzc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result#PPA268,M1

http://books.google.com/books?id=0d2gYaaCGcQC&pg=PA152&lpg=PA152&dq=Battle,+Severn,+maryland&source=web&ots=YjTqu9Y_k9&sig=FHBI8Qswkinqb9lc0ssZB4-gvc4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=10&ct=result#PPA154,M1

http://books.google.com/books?id=SPMXAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=Battle,+Severn,+maryland&source=web&ots=VOU2bkWyIb&sig=AEDlTTPIG16Wm86MsbpqklhXBqA&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result

==This is Camp x-ray==
No problems, i've also had a poke at ] so its a bit better. ] 04:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

That's good, I saw it. I also saw your statement on the Auschwitz piece that I deleted. It was just too over the top. No matter your political persuasion, I really doubt the Auschwitz slogan inspired the American leadership at the time to adopt the motto. ] (]) 04:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Geo swan is a good lad, he can be over the top some times (like this time), but he knows a hell of a lot on gitmo. ] 04:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

He can be a bit overzealous in his convictions, which is why we butt heads, but he writes some good articles when he does so in a neutral manner and uses solid sources. ] (]) 04:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== Bernard Ryan ==

]

== Loyola ==

Thank you sooooooo much for your help on the article. I feel like I am the only person who gives two hoots about Loyola's page. I've made some improvements, (some mistakes as well), bit its a shame that the article is so poor. Georgetown's article is worlds away from ours. Anywho, I'm only a sophomore undergrad, but I do my best. ] (]) 16:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

That's alright, I'll be helping from here on out. I would be interested in any materials that can be used to improve it, aside from the website. Talk to the Jesuits about early history.] (]) 23:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I've been doing so so with a few priests. There are a few books in the library, nothing too great. Right now I'm just looking at the FA articles from templates, and organization.] (]) 06:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

So over the past few months I've done a bunch to extend the Loyola's prominence by increasing the number of articles, in a fashionable more wiki-friendly way. Any input? Also, can we make a Wiki-Project for Loyola? There are still a lot of things missing, ie institutional history. Also, the alumni page is really weak, check out Dartmouth's, think we can emulate that? Happy New Year ] (]) 22:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

== Loyola Alum ==

For the Loyola Alumni Section. That part on Mark Bowden at the end should be taken out. Not just because it is awkward, but there is already one military-fiction writer in the blurb, having two is just overkill. Also, most schools have a "featured" alumni on each page with a picture of them (ie Bill Clinton on the G-town page). We should figure out someone to put up on it. I was thinking Michael D. Griffin, but he only received a MA from Sellinger.] (]) 15:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

:Interzil, Loyola is, first and foremost, a liberal arts college, and it creates authors. In this case, the most famous living alums of the college are authors, both of whom are well known. The fact they both write about the military is entirely irrelevant to their accomplishments. Further, Black Hawk Down is a documentary piece about the events in Mog, not fiction as you assert, and Bowden wrote this as a journalist. Therefore, I do not concur. As for photos, I will see what I can do.] (]) 22:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

:As of the 2008-2013 strategic plan, Loyola is a comprehensive university, which is not exactly a liberal arts college. There are many undergrads and postgrads who are prominent figures of society. Your claims regarding Clancy and Bowden make sense, however, the article blurb written under the Alumni section talks about Loyola having government, religious, and business leaders. Michael D. Griffin is quite possibly more important than any of those two authors, and should receive recognition for it. The main article is Loyola College in Maryland Alumni, if you would like to focus on both of the authors on this page, do so. However, writting an exert on a 'well-rounded' school such as Loyola deserves diversity.] (]) 16:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

:Also, John Hall never graduated from Loyola. He dropped out. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::John Hall dropped out of Notre Dame to my understanding, and graduated from Loyola. As for Loyola being a "comprehensive university", it has two schools, one for business, the other for liberal arts, and the liberal arts core is required of all students. It is VERY MUCH a traditional, Jesuit college in that respect, and its notable alumni are heavily influenced as a result. Saying a university is "comprehensive" is fine and good, but a "comprehensive university" normally means separate schools at the undergraduate and graduate level (School of Medicine, School of law, School of Nursing, School of Education, etc.) equalling more than two. Loyola has not attained this distinction to date, and is listed as a "Master's University as a result", though that appears the direction my alma mater is headed. As for the "diversity" of alumni, add Griffin if you like. ] (]) 17:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

== Incivility ==

You have unfairly accused me of vandalism three times without any basis, and after being told quite explicitly that the edit is not vandalism . I have not breached ] nor I am under any editing restriction with regard to ].

Your uncivil and groundless personal attacks are in contravention of wikipedia policy. ] (]) 11:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

:Notifying you of this request: . ] (]) 11:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I have responded to your post on the admin. board. Once again, please attempt to reach consensus before making any further changes on ]. Thank you.] (]) 18:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

== The Burning of Cork City ==

]

== A Saying for Consideration ==

''An rud a théann i bhfad,téann sé i bhfuaire.''
Meaning - ''What drags on grows cold.''

== ] ==

I am speedy closing the AFD you started. Speedy deletions do not go to AFD. Articles tagged for speedy deletion go to a separate place where admins there look at them and decide whether it meets the certain criteria (in this case, A7) or does not. If it does not, then possibly AFD is in order. If the speedy is declined, then I would renominate the article for AFD but following the guidelines set forth in the ]. Thank you, <font color="#063">]</font> (<font color="#063">]</font>) 07:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

:Okay, thanks. I'll know for next time.] (]) 07:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

== For reference ==

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool


==SJU housing==
Please see the SJU talk page for my thoughts.

== Vandalism ==

It is a kind of attack that blocking will not help. A website has a link to that page and random users visiting that site will click on the link and save the page. These are the only edits they will ever make and they are from such a wide range of ip address that blocking will not stop it. If it continues I will request page protection. Thanks for the heads up. Thank you for your time, <span style="background:#000000">]]</span> 06:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

==Re:==
Sorry, I just made a mistake while translating the section into an another wikipedia. ] (]) 07:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

== re: "Oh my head" ==

(copy and paste from my talk page, please respond there if desired)

You are simply not going to believe this.

sigh...--] (]) 06:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
:Don't let it get to you. I'm having a hard time not believing that this editor isn't engaging in a wee bit of "trolling", it all seems a little over the top in my opinion. There is no doubt whatsoever in my opinion that the material being posted by the editor in question was completely unacceptable according to policy, subsequently I've added the article to my watch list (as I'm sure a few others have as well) and I'll continue to monitor it. Keep in mind that when material is posted as far removed as this stuff was from the policy of the encyclopedia, you can contact an administrator directly at . I can't imagine that there are many administrators that would see the continual reposting of this material (after warnings) as anything more than an act of straight vandalism. And of course always remember, try not to feed the trolls! lol I'd also like to suggest that although the editor in question may have technically been guilty of "edit warring", a more accurate 'charge' under these circumstances in my opinion, is a violation of the encyclopedia's policy against non-neutral point of view contributions. Should they choose to continue to post this material in its present form, after the expiration of the block currently in place, they should be systematically warned (1-4) that they are violating non-npov and barring that, reported to AIV as vandals. cheers ] (]) 16:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


== Re: Vandal ==

Thanks, I've just reported them to AIV. Recommended short block with account creation enabled. Multiple warnings. Cheers, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>]<font face="Arial" color="1F860E">]</font></sup></font></b> 06:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


==re: vandalism???==
You've reverted my edits to the ] page.

I had removed Charles Dane from the company staff listing: he has not worked for CCP in quite a while, and that position no longer exists.

I added that CCP announced a partnership with Atari to publish EVE. Reference: http://www.ccpgames.com/press/press_releases.asp?pressReleaseID=50. I was in the process of adding this reference in when I discovered your reversion.

I also edited that Quafe was a relabeling of a popular Icelandic soft drink, Orka.

Please realize that not everyone who adds or removes content to a page is doing so in a nefarious way. I fail to see how my content additions and one subtraction equates to vandalism. Please revert my edits. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:You can revert your own edits if you like, but understand that this is an encyclopedia. Thus, if you want to make a statement, it has to be supported. Therefore if the softdrink is a "repackaging", provide a cite in support. Your other edit was incomplete, but saved. I will revert these types of edits to ensure a clean-up of the article. In the future, use the preview feature to make edits to avoid this.] (]) 21:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

==Why????==
You said "The UK is a better description". Why are people like ] and ] of ] from ] ('''England''') included in ], NOT ]? Why are people like ] and ] of ] from ] ('''England''') included in ]? BOTH are English people! I don't think I'm gonna do a vandalism. I only did the best of an intension. Being blocked is absolutely wrong. --] (]) 03:05, 17 November 2008 (UT)

:When did I ever block you? And maybe they are confused. They are described as "British", not "English". I am a "British National" of "Irish descent" myself. ] (]) 03:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

:Sorry, you don't say "you will be blocked", it's another person. By the way, are Gallagher brothers English and Lennon and McCartney British, not English? I don't understand it! Why are Lennon and McCartney British people of Irish descent, not English people of Irish descent although their article is included in ], not ]? Are they from Liverpool of UK's ENGLAND? Are Gallagher brothers from Manchester of UK ENGLAND? Why is all I do wrong? I cannot accept it. --] (]) 03:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

==Michelle Malkin==

I posted the need for some changes in the controversy section. The article doesn't meet standards and I'm working on it. Is there a problem?] (]) 05:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

:I changed it because of the "stiiiiil" descriptor. This is common by editors who disagree with others philosophies. If this is a proper title, give a cite and it's good. Hope that helps.] (]) 05:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

== McCain ==

Why did you revert my edits? McCain Foods Limited is a billion-dollar multinational business and the second biggest private company in Canada - clearly notable, and best known as simply "McCain". Secondly, the protection notice is obviously wrong otherwise how could I edit it? It's editors like you who are ruining Misplaced Pages. -] (]) 07:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
:The page is not protected - I removed the template because it's not protected - see the talk page. I didn't create a redirect at all (that's an ''outright lie''), I changed it to use a more specific template to make navigation easier. Please ], and stop recent changes patrolling until you know how to be both civil and understand how Misplaced Pages works. Having an account doesn't suddenly give you special powers to treat IP users like crap. -] (]) 07:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
::I have to agree on the semi-protection issue; any time an I.P. removes a protection template from a page, you can safely assume that the page is indeed unprotected (I should have removed the template myself when I unprotected it). As for the rest, that's a content dispute; the two of you should work it out on the talk page. ] (]) 07:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

::Seeing as the edits in question weren't vandalism (one set of edits added a dabhat, another removed a protection template from an unprotected page), would you consider rescinding the warnings you gave for them? Regardless of opinion on whether McCain foods should be linked from the top of the article (I personally feel the regular dabhat is enough), the anon was clearly not deliberately vandalising the article, and seeing undeserved warnings on a user talk page like that is often enough to put off some users. ] <sup> ] ]</sup> 19:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

:::I have rescinded them, though I have doubts as to his purpose in linking the two. ] (]) 20:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

::::I agree it could easily be seen the wrong way, and like you I feel the dablink is enough. Still, thanks for taking them back. :) ] <sup> ] ]</sup> 20:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

::::Well, we have consensus. He's salty as well, DW. ] (]) 21:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for undoing vandalism on my user page! ] (]) 05:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
:I have reported him to the admins for vandalizing my user page and adding useless info to ]. I have reverted his edits many times. That info can be found on their website. ] (]) 05:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

== Thank You! ==

Thanks for reverting the vandalism done to my userpage! ] (]) 23:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

:No problem.--] (]) 00:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

==Zymurgy==

I am an active follower of Zymurgy and am rather interested in fermentation of all kinds, not just during brewery <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:While this may be, you may not vandalize pages. Please stop doing so.--] (]) 00:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== Edit Reverts ==

Why did you revert my edits to ]? The restored page contains a link that no longer is valid. ] (]) 00:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

:Thanks for checking - happy editing... ] (]) 00:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== Edit Revert ==
Why did you revert my edit to Operation Steel curtain? I removed that campaignbox because it had been agreed to use the smaller one instead of the big one.] (]) 02:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

:If there is an agreement, revert it. I don't see anything to replace it, however. I'm looking at another page where it was removed right now. Give me the link to the agreement, and we'll call it square, and I will agree to edit my warning given earlier. Thanks.--] (]) 02:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

::Ok, wait one minute so I find it.] (]) 02:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

:::Ok, the current look of the smaller campaignbox was agreed upon in late 2006, because the big one was getting to large (and also included the bombings not just battles), so we decided to make the small one which would provide a link to the box with the battles and a link to the box with the bombings. There isn't much talk here on the discussion page ] ], because most of the discussion was conducted on our talk pages back then between me, Publicus and TheFEARGod. And we decided on the current one.] (]) 02:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

:::Looks good to me. I'll edit my warning accordingly. Good luck editing.--] (]) 02:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

::::Thanks. Cheers!] (]) 04:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== Our little IP friend... ==

Thanks for the heads-up; for future reference, you could also report at ], giving a brief rundown of the history with this IP. (In fact, that's probably the best course of action--you're likely to get a faster reply there. As an example: it's just a fluke that I'm even awake and online just at the moment; normally I'd be asleep, and meanwhile this guy could have gone on making bad edits til sunrise.) But definitely keep up the good work--we don't need to be cleaning up after stuff like that. ] 06:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
:Fair enough--I gave him a week, this time. If he comes back, I'll probably take it to AN/I for a sanity check on a much-longer block length--even though I work in tech-support IRL, I'm foggy on the intricacies of dynamic IP's and the mechanisms by which they're eventually released back into the pool. Take care!] 06:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== why did you revert my edit? ==
I recently made an edit to the ] page to add the sexgame-reviews.com site. I believe this is a valid entry as this site covers a range of adult video games, both current and historical. It is also similar to the site MMOVSG.net which is an existing entry in the link section. Can you explain why that entry is valid while mine is not?

The entry is .

] (]) 22:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

:You're right. Just re-add your link and it's fine. Just as an FYI, we look for spam and sales links on these articles, and that was probably what hit me when I reverted it. Sorry for the confusion.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

== Marist College Rosalie ==

Hi Yachtsman,

I am not up to spped with editing and reverts and all that stuff. I wrote much of the Marist College Rosalie ... I see that you have reverted things back to my original. Someone has now gone back and reverted that. the page looks a mess. I'm not sure what is going on ... could you have look at it when you get the time. Thanks ] (]) 00:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

:Done, and I left a message on your page. It looks like he is merging a separate article into the article in question. I'll keep up with it from here on out. ] (]) 02:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

changing my headline on Northwest High School in cedar hill

Ya it may not be constructive but what i put down was true, I did score a touchdown, and i did shock basically everyone that knew me. What i want to know is how you get around to Northwest High School in cedar hill, theres like millions of other articles that would be highly important, and you get around to changing a small ( but true) edit about a school that no one has ever heard of, i think its best that i get this, because your ruining my life.. eww <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

you know what, thats cool that id get my article deleted, im graduating anyways next may, so im guessing im not important anymore to mention on wikipedia, --] (]) 01:18, 28 November 2008 (UTC)nope, no signature, ill get deleted if i put my name

== help please? ==


id like to know how to properly create a table for an article --] (]) 05:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Ricky

I noticed theres not much on the rams 2004 season article, so id like to include a table that would include their games and outcomes of that season. I feel like more should be added due to the kind of season the rams had in 2004. Oh and about the account, yes i also think it make life easier, im working on setting up an email account so i can create one within the next few days. As for their 2000 season article i figure theres no need for help on the want sentence that i edited, i was wanting to figure how to link a couple words to their own respective pages on wikipedia, but Rams and NFL are already used earlier in the paragraph so i figure theres no need to repeat links.--] (]) 03:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)ricky

The info box you showed me on my talkpage isnt exactly what i was talking about. So what im gonna due is put the information in the article and you can go ahead and take a look. The Article im editing is 2004 St. Louis Rams season <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Im having a little luck at adding headers, so ill c what i can do about the rest

{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
! header 1
! header 2
! header 3
! header 4
! header 5
|-
| row 1, cell 1
| row 1, cell 2
| row 1, cell 3
| row 1, cell 4
| row 1, cell 5
|-
| row 2, cell 1
| row 2, cell 2
| row 2, cell 3
| row 2, cell 4
| row 2, cell 5
|-
| row 3, cell 1
|}
as you can tell im having success!--RICKY 22:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

== Peach ==

Why did you delete my addtion section about the importance of peach tree in Vietnam? I would like to know the reason. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Occupy movement criticism ==
:My apologies, a mistake in rollback (i.e., I hit the wrong button) I meant to fix it, but got caught up in something else. Please re-add it.] (]) 04:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


Hello there. Several editors have mentioned we seem a bit lite on criticism in the ] article, and I have to agree. The dedicated article you're working on seems to be written and researched to a high standard, and would be great to link to from a small sub section in the main article, which Id be happy to write if no one else does. As you seem to have paused your editing, if you dont resume or raise objections in the next 3-4 weeks, I might promote your sub article direct to main space myself as it would be a shame for your excellent work not to be used. PS, happy new year to you, and nice to meet a fellow editor born in Royal Windsor! ] (]) 17:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
== Creating my own bio ==
: Thanks for the message on my talk. Sorry to mess you about but Im no longer motivated to do the work involved, due to the way some of my friends in the resuce squad are being treated. Hopefully someone else will take care of it, if not, might get to it in a few weeks. ] (]) 14:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Would i be allowed to create a bio on myself, ya i know im not important to the rest of the world outside my family and friends, well if not im starting one ahead of time so go ahead and have it removed if not <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:: I know it's been a few years but I see that ] is still there. I don't know if you're still working on it but would you consider moving it to draftspace under ]? -- ] (]) 08:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


== Ac/DC Equipment ==
:You can do a general bio, but I would strongly argue you not use your actual contact information (your name and/or e-mail). Save the bio stuff for facebook. the object here is to create articles that are written in an encylcopedic (i.e., a scholastic) style. If you want some tips, check out the intro. pages for other editors. Hope that helps. Also, sign your name on posts. Scroll over the buttons on top to the tone that shows "Your signature with time stamp" and give it a click at the end of your post. --] (]) 05:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


Thank you for your concern. I will discuss this in the article's talk section where other editors can voice their opinions also. ] (]) 22:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for April 4==
== short summary ==
so i put a short summary of the ], if you have time, go ahead to that article and tell me what you think, I took what I knew as well as some information off STLBlues.com to make a short summary of how their season is going so far and I tend to extend it as the season goes on.--RICKY 00:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
and by the way im doing a research paper for class on athletes as role models, if you could suggest some articles supporting the fact they are role models it be highly appreciated. Thanks!--RICKY 00:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
just message me at my talk page if you have any ideas-Ricky2009 <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 17:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Is the article you suggested about the 2 players not allowed to play in that bowl game because they were black, yeah i got an article from another site cause im having difficulty finding it on wikipedia--RICKY 02:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies==
:Yes. Also, check out how I edited your previous entry on the Blues. Take note of how I added to the article for the future. The players you named are linked now, together with some general language fixes.] (]) 02:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


Uh, hi. Can you please state why you removed the content for ]. You need to state a reason why you removed most of the headings. Apparently, I look at these cartoons regularly so I know what is going on, so just state a reason before you remove things. Thanks. ] (]) 20:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
I found a shorter and sweeter summary on wikipedia on the Universities page, so thanks!. Af for signing my posts, Im hitting the signature button up top, and its automatically putting my account name, so im guessing i need to add my name right after the signature.
--RICKY 02:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Ricky <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
As for the links, i figured that out like 10 minutes ago ] <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I figured you would. Recheck that Rams 2004-2005 piece, I recall them losing to the Eagles in the DS after beating Green Bay that year in the WC.--] (]) 02:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


== ] ==


Hi,<br>
== Question from the new kid ==
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
So i just edited the BLues 08 09 season summary after a player reached a milestone not even 10 minutes ago. Im wanting to know if it was nessesary to put down how he recieved a standing ovation. The blues were on the against an opponent the guy recently played for. I put down the milestone and the fact it tied the game. Im just wanting to know if three sentences in the summary about his milestone is too much. --RICKY 21:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC) As for the question on the rams, no. They beat the eagles in week 16. They lost to Greenbay a little earlier. But in the playoffs, they defeated Seattle for the third time that season, then had a rematch with Atlanta from week 2. The Rams allowed over 300 rushing yards against the Falcons. However, the Rams did play both teams you mentioned in the 2001 playoffs, both of them the Rams were victorious over on their way to Super Bowl 36
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 -->
:Be bold, Rick. I'm sure it's fine. Keep up the good work. --] (]) 03:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


== ] reverts == == ] ==


Hi, at ] we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --] (]) 13:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}} ... I am concerned about the lack of discussion between {{User|Taz Manchester}} and {{User|Matt57}} regarding recent edits to {{la|American Muslim Council}} ... I happen to agree with Matt57 ... can we ''please'' discuss this at ]? Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{#if:72.75.110.31|{{User|72.75.110.31}}|] (])}}''' <sub>22:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)</sub>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:WikiProject_Ireland_members -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Hi Yachtsman, I have been busy lately so been unable to respond in detail regarding the issue although I plan to have it written up soon, {{User|72.75.110.31}} is very patronising and keeps stating I have an agenda while he does not which goes against the good faith encouraged in Misplaced Pages, please could you remind him of this.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
(] (]) 05:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC))


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
== Willing to Keep Contributing ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
If you could suggest some more articles to do with NASCAR that are blank, I'd be more than welcome to research and fill in.--RICKY 04:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/32&oldid=750617622 -->
:Rick: I put the NASCAR link on your page. Hit the link and you will be able to see what projects they are working on right now. I would suggest you get involved through that group. As for your signature, you can use either the top cursive signature, or the four tides symbot at the bottom by cutting and pasting it at the end of a message.--] (]) 03:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


== RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey ==
== Something I dont understand ==
I kind of need help with the signature name, and what it does when its checked/unchecked. Dont completely understand it all.--RICKY 21:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


]
== Correcting spelling... ==
<big>'''''Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!'''''</big>


This is a '''one-time-only''' message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the ''']''' that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
I would think someone as active as you would know that correcting spelling of other people's talk page comments is ] and rude. Please don't do this. ] (]) 12:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


# ]
:Must have done it while doing editing patrol for spelling errors in good faith. I'll make sure I don't do it in the future.] (]) 19:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]


Further, there are ] that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
== re: Battle of the Severn ==


Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Sorry, I'm not very active on Misplaced Pages anymore, I'm pretty busy with other things. I'm sure another member of ] would be glad to help.] <sup>]</sup> 22:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


<small>Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{tl|User wikipedia/RC Patrol|}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.</small>
== Battle of the Severn ==
Nice job on the article, I condensed your references and removed several dead (red) links. I also assessed it a "C" class article. One question: you say that this was the last battle of the English civil war which ended in 1651 but the battle occurred 5 years later. This battle apparently had no impact upon that war as the war had been over for quite awhile. If there is an answer you should put it in the article with a reference.--«]» <sup>«</sup>]<sup>»</sup> 23:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
==DYK==
hen you finish, you should nominate the article to be shown on Misplaced Pages's front page, as a ] article. The article will get plenty of exposure for that day. But you have to nominate it within 5 days of its creation.--«]» <sup>«</sup>]<sup>»</sup> 13:59, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


Best regards, {{u|Stevietheman}} — <small>Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
:Yachtsman1, I've left one more minor comment on your nomination ]. Please respond ASAP, since we've got to hurry to get this article to the front page before it gets to old! Thanks, &mdash;]&nbsp;<small><sup>''']'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>''']'''</sub></small> 21:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
<!--Sent per Special:PermaLink/753582870#Request_for_mass_message_delivery:_December_6.2C_2016 at WT:MMS-->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Stevietheman/RCPatrollers_list&oldid=753533319 -->


== PolitiFact ==
::Thanks. The sources for the Annapolis and Providence stuff look good...I'm still a little concerned about Orlady's comment, though, mentioning that she only found one source for the fact that it was the ''last'' battle of the war, and that the source might not be reliable. Do you have any other sources you could add to that? I tried to look for some, but to be honest I wasn't sure where in the article to look for that info. Anyway, once that last thing is cleared up, I think we should be good to go. &mdash;]&nbsp;<small><sup>''']'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>''']'''</sub></small> 00:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
== DYK for Battle of the Severn ==


I cited a nonpartisan college study. Stop removing content from Misplaced Pages. You are hurting the community. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No, {{u|66.194.72.58}}, you are attempting to ] the article. Stop it. ] (]) 03:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
:Home Lander is correct on this point{{u|66.194.72.58}}, and if you wish to work within the community, you have to follow its rules, which includes avoiding POV on articles. ] (]) 03:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


By the way, the cited page states clearly something along the line of "conservative" at the top. That doesn't help either in matters of NPOV. ] (]) 03:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|]
|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']'''''
}}{{#if:|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} <!-- ], ] -->
--«]» <sup>«</sup>]<sup>»</sup> 17:57, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


:Good god, amidst the above good faith IP edit and the personal attacks from the problem child at hand here, I couldn't even keep the two of them straight. ] (]) 03:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
== bball ==


::No ill will, we all make mistakes. I'll file a report at ANI/3RR - that page probably needs some kind of protection (given what's just happening...) ] (]) 03:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
I know. As if that St. Mary's loss wasn't bad enough. Merry Christmas! ] (]) 05:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
*So in the pregame show I'm pretty sure they accidentally showed a Loyola Marymount clip, ughhh ] (]) 21:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


:: This is like the bad old days. ] (]) 03:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
== ] Reminder ==


:::Fill me in, I'd love to hear about them! ] (]) 03:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. As I was reading about your great contributions on Misplaced Pages (I'm impressed!), I happened to notice that on your userpage, you are attempting to respond to potential questions regarding reversion of edits. It's a minor thing, but "rollback" and "revert" are technically not the same function on Misplaced Pages, although many people use them inter-changeably. Currently, only users with ] are allowed to use the ''rollback'' function. All other edits are considered to be "reverts" or "undo's", as corny as that last one sounds. If you use ''TWINKLE'' or ''HUGGLE'', there is a ''rollback'' option when patrolling for vandalism, but the action posts as "revert" for people who are not admins. I thought I'd point it out, just in case it was an oversight. Best wishes for the new year. --]<b><i>]</i></b><sup>]</sup>] 08:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
*Here's a WikiGnome tip: You can change the way your signature appears on your posts by visiting: ] and doing some minor cut and paste. Cheers! --]<b><i>]</i></b><sup>]</sup>] 08:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
*Congratulations on your new rollback status. You are becoming completely wikified! If you look in the upper right hand corner of this page, you'll notice a little gift, which most Misplaced Pages editors are proud to display. Best regards. --]<b><i>]</i></b><sup>]</sup>] 04:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


:::: POV was, shall we say, an issue post 9/11 and for about five-seven years thereafter. The edit wars from both sides of the aisle were amazing. I hope it does not devolve to this point again.] (]) 04:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
==Your request for rollback==
]
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
*Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
*Rollback can be used to revert ''clear'' cases of ] ''only'', and not good faith edits.
*Rollback may be removed at any time.
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view ]. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message {{#ifeq:|<!-- nothing -->|<!-- also nothing -->|on ]}} if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;] 22:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
::Thank you. I will use it sparingly.] (]) 23:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


::::: Understandable. In the era of Trump, however, nothing would be too surprising to me. ] (]) 04:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
== Pages for Reference ==


:::::: True, but it makes real scholarly efforts to keep things neutral and balanced all the more important. We can sink or swim, it is all our choice in the end. ] (]) 04:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Yachtsman1/AFD_Links


::::::: Well said. ] (]) 04:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
== Milos Kocic ==


Yachtsman1, if you could help with saving this article from being deleted it would be awesome. Thanks ] (]) 18:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Page has now been protected so at least this is over with for now. ] (]) 04:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
PS the hounds are on MASN tonight, woohoo!!!


: Good news at least. Thanks for the update!] (]) 04:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
== Pholcidae ==
Yachtsman1, the edits I did to ] were reverts of vandalism done by 2 anonymous editors.
I hope this may clear up what was going on there. ] (]) 06:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:Yes, I just made the change, sorry for the confusion ] (]) 06:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, Thanks ] (]) 06:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


== HR333 == == July 2017 ==


] Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to ], from its old location at {{no redirect|User:Yachtsman1/Criticism of the occupy movement}}. This has been done because the ] is the preferred location for ] submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-draftmoved --> <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
What's wrong with my edit? I've disambiguated a star. ] (]) 08:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
:It was redirected to dick cheney's impeachment article.] (]) 08:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
::Yes it is, that's why it's a dab hatlink using the template {{tl|redirect}} ] (]) 08:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
:::So, are you going to remove the warning message? ] (]) 06:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== Enhanced Interrogation Techniques ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Yachtsman1,


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I'd like to discuss the article "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" with you, but I think we can present our thoughts better in real time, where we have constant feedback. So I give you my ICQ#: 121860056. If you prefer another type of messenger or chat, please let me know and I'll see to, that I can install it.
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 -->
==] concern==
Hi there, I'm ]. I just wanted to let you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.


If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
Best regards, ] (]) 07:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


You may request ] of the content if it meets requirements.
===Response with regards to EIT===
It is rather obnoxious the way people insist on not having a neutral article for Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. I have mostly just corrected and re-corrected the leading section, but the whole article has problems, and might even need to be re-written. ] (]) 20:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at ].
==Response==
I saw your comments at the ANI. Indeed, some edits look almost like ] or perhaps ] (I do not mean you of course). I will be watching to perhaps collect some eveidence. Your comments about this would be welcome.] (]) 14:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


Thank you for your attention. ] (]) 01:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
::Well, that was interesting reading indeed. Note that ] meets dissenting views with the same "POV pushing" model as ]. There are striking similarities in their writing styles, debate techniques, and refusal to acknowledge consensus and to roundly ignore countering viewpoints. The same snarky comments and objectification of the "vast right wing conspiracy" are used to marginalize and objetify dissenting editors. Also, note that the article has a number of "curious" IP edits that have only made one or two edits, but which center on this article almost exclusively, then are never used again. Having looked now at the history of the banned user in question, I must admit that the evidence is rather strong, though I am certainly not an impartial observer.--] (]) 17:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


== Your submission at ]: ] (June 21) ==
==I just noticed ] incredibly ridiculous ANI complaint==
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by Shadowowl was:
This editor is entirely out-of-control, and you are correct re the ] issues.] (]) 17:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
:Yes indeed, totally out of control at this point. Goes berzerk when anyone disagrees with her POV.] (]) 17:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


{{divbox|gray|3=This submission provides insufficient ] for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the ] for information on how to better format your submission.|}}<!--
== Human Rights in Los Angeles California seeking editing suggestions ==
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:


{{divbox|blue|3=Appears to be unfinished.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
Hi there,
{{clear}}
This is my first time on wikipedia, I actually came looking for sosmething else, and then noticed that human rights in the U.s. was on the table,and could not resist.
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to ] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
I have years of experience in publishing and editing in peer reviewed science,and I also edited two books of fine literature. I consider myself very good at listening and accepting criticism.
* If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to ], click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks"></span> or on the <span class="plainlinks"></span>.
* You can also use ].


<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#aaa;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:10pt"> &raquo; ] &#124; ]</span> 08:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->
I appreciate you style in editing. I was unfocused, and following your comment I removed the paragraph I entered there on Pico entirely.


{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
But I do have important material that is fully referenced to contribute on human rights in the u.S. However, it irritated someone, and I decided to move it to my talk page, and seek editing sugggestions before moving it back to the main page.
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| ]
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Yachtsman1'''!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the ''']'''. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the ''']''', a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="font-weight:bold;color:#aaa;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:10pt"> &raquo; ] &#124; ]</span> 08:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
]


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
Anytthoughts about the subject, and also about the mechanics of editing and formatting here would eb gratefully acknowledged.


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
I hope to hear from you!


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
] (])Jz12345678 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 21:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Yachtsman:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
Please take a look at Human Rights in Los Angeles County, California 1985-2009.
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/12&oldid=866998410 -->
I tried to format it closer to Misplaced Pages standards. I get into some trouble with the References. I inserted a couple of them, but each time I got "display error" on my screen, which I have never encountered before. Moreover, the references as they appear now do not show the text that was supposed to be in them.
Any suggestion would be gratefully accepted.
] (]) 02:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Jz12345678

Latest revision as of 07:21, 2 November 2023

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Yachtsman1 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 15 November 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Archiving icon
Archives

/archive1/archive 2/archive 3


edit count | edit summary usage


Occupy movement criticism

Hello there. Several editors have mentioned we seem a bit lite on criticism in the Occupy movement article, and I have to agree. The dedicated article you're working on seems to be written and researched to a high standard, and would be great to link to from a small sub section in the main article, which Id be happy to write if no one else does. As you seem to have paused your editing, if you dont resume or raise objections in the next 3-4 weeks, I might promote your sub article direct to main space myself as it would be a shame for your excellent work not to be used. PS, happy new year to you, and nice to meet a fellow editor born in Royal Windsor! FeydHuxtable (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message on my talk. Sorry to mess you about but Im no longer motivated to do the work involved, due to the way some of my friends in the resuce squad are being treated. Hopefully someone else will take care of it, if not, might get to it in a few weeks. FeydHuxtable (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
I know it's been a few years but I see that User:Yachtsman1/Criticism of the occupy movement is still there. I don't know if you're still working on it but would you consider moving it to draftspace under WP:AFC? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Ac/DC Equipment

Thank you for your concern. I will discuss this in the article's talk section where other editors can voice their opinions also. 174.118.142.187 (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Mary's High School (Annapolis, Maryland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severna Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies

Uh, hi. Can you please state why you removed the content for Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1940–49). You need to state a reason why you removed most of the headings. Apparently, I look at these cartoons regularly so I know what is going on, so just state a reason before you remove things. Thanks. Yay Dad (talk) 20:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, at Misplaced Pages:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

PolitiFact

I cited a nonpartisan college study. Stop removing content from Misplaced Pages. You are hurting the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.72.58 (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

No, 66.194.72.58, you are attempting to WP:POV the article. Stop it. Home Lander (talk) 03:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Home Lander is correct on this point66.194.72.58, and if you wish to work within the community, you have to follow its rules, which includes avoiding POV on articles. Yachtsman1 (talk) 03:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

By the way, the cited page states clearly something along the line of "conservative" at the top. That doesn't help either in matters of NPOV. 69.165.196.103 (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Good god, amidst the above good faith IP edit and the personal attacks from the problem child at hand here, I couldn't even keep the two of them straight. Home Lander (talk) 03:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
No ill will, we all make mistakes. I'll file a report at ANI/3RR - that page probably needs some kind of protection (given what's just happening...) 69.165.196.103 (talk) 03:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This is like the bad old days. Yachtsman1 (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Fill me in, I'd love to hear about them! Home Lander (talk) 03:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
POV was, shall we say, an issue post 9/11 and for about five-seven years thereafter. The edit wars from both sides of the aisle were amazing. I hope it does not devolve to this point again.Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Understandable. In the era of Trump, however, nothing would be too surprising to me. Home Lander (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
True, but it makes real scholarly efforts to keep things neutral and balanced all the more important. We can sink or swim, it is all our choice in the end. Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Well said. Home Lander (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Page has now been protected so at least this is over with for now. Home Lander (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Good news at least. Thanks for the update!Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Criticism of the occupy movement, from its old location at User:Yachtsman1/Criticism of the occupy movement. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America 16:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Criticism of the occupy movement concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Criticism of the occupy movement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criticism of the occupy movement (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission. The comment the reviewer left was: Appears to be unfinished. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. » Shadowowl | talk 08:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse logo Hello, Yachtsman1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 08:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yachtsman1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Categories: