Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Mario/Archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games | Peer review | Mario Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:20, 14 July 2009 editBlake (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,474 edits Mario: reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:05, 2 February 2011 edit undoHarry Blue5 (talk | contribs)3,388 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Mario to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Mario/Archive1 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
:::::It just looks weird having all that text and no image. There is a giant part of the article that is bare.--] (]) 20:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC) :::::It just looks weird having all that text and no image. There is a giant part of the article that is bare.--] (]) 20:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': More sources are needed, especially in the Appearances and Characteristics sections. ] (]) 18:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC) *'''Comment''': More sources are needed, especially in the Appearances and Characteristics sections. ] (]) 18:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
::Also, you need to add info to ] and ]. Even though they aren't out yet, they should be referenced. ] (]) 22:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC) ::<s>Also, you need to add info to ] and ]. Even though they aren't out yet, they should be referenced.</s> ] (]) 22:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)</s>
O.k. nevermind what I said. I think the '''Baby Mario''' section needs either expanded with a small picture of Baby Mario. ] (]) 00:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
:::That would be talking about the games themselves. Which is what I wanted to get away from when I re-wrote it to be more of Mario's role. Having "Mario is going to be in ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii'' and ''Super Mario Galazy 2''" wouldnt really tell the reader anything about Mario. Its a Mario game! Of course he is going to be in it! Do we really need to state the obvious? --] (]) 00:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC) :::That would be talking about the games themselves. Which is what I wanted to get away from when I re-wrote it to be more of Mario's role. Having "Mario is going to be in ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii'' and ''Super Mario Galazy 2''" wouldnt really tell the reader anything about Mario. Its a Mario game! Of course he is going to be in it! Do we really need to state the obvious? --] (]) 00:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:05, 2 February 2011

Mario

I recently replaced the Appearances section with more fitting information. A problem before was that the section talked more about the actual games and how their reception was then what Mario actually did in the games. I have fixed this and expanded the section. This article is a B at the moment, and can easily be a GA with some fixes. --Blake (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Note that I am not a major contributer for this article, and might not have enough time or the resources to make all the changes that get brought up. --Blake (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
For openers, take off the picture of Solid Snake and Mario. It makes it look like its forcusing on Snake. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Yah, I needed a picture of Mario in Brawl for that "other games" section and couldnt find one except for this. But I think someone will have to get standalone art of Mario to replace all those pictures anyways. --Blake (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't think the article needs that image; it wouldn't pass NFCC. Neither would the one with Baby Mario and Yoshi. Just letting you know. Tezkag72 (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
It just looks weird having all that text and no image. There is a giant part of the article that is bare.--Blake (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, you need to add info to New Super Mario Bros. Wii and Super Mario Galaxy 2. Even though they aren't out yet, they should be referenced. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

O.k. nevermind what I said. I think the Baby Mario section needs either expanded with a small picture of Baby Mario. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

That would be talking about the games themselves. Which is what I wanted to get away from when I re-wrote it to be more of Mario's role. Having "Mario is going to be in New Super Mario Bros. Wii and Super Mario Galazy 2" wouldnt really tell the reader anything about Mario. Its a Mario game! Of course he is going to be in it! Do we really need to state the obvious? --Blake (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)