Misplaced Pages

User talk:Artichoker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:27, 15 August 2009 editTezero (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,544 edits →Vandalism: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:39, 13 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,142,213 edits →Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(181 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
#] #]
#] #]
#]
}} }}


==The ] Newsletter (February 2009)== == The ] Newsletter, Q1 2014 ==
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter/20090304}}
::*<small>Newsletter delivery by <font face="Verdana">]</font> 00:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</small>


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20140402}}
==WholeSecurity==
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=596799481 -->
WholeSecurity and AntiBot are not related! I used to work there. This article in the 3rd paragraph talks about how AntiBot and SONAR (developed by WholeSecurity) are complementary therefore implying they are not related (how can something complement itself??!!). The WholeSecurity article is still relevant as it was a full company that employed about 100 people. It was real and the article describes what they did. http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9727254-7.html "Norton AntiBot is designed to complement Symantec's existing SONAR technology, a behavior-monitoring and blocking feature acquired from a company called Whole Security last year and currently available on Norton Antivirus, Norton Internet Security, and Norton 360."--] (]) 23:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:All right, let's not get engaged in an ]. Remember ] within 24 hours; it is a blockable offense. ] (]) 20:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider
::I'm sorry, but I have utterly no idea what you are talking about. ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 22:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


== (Ir)relevant sentence == == Madoka work, and GA ==


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
Hello, Artichoker! You recently reverted an edit of mine concerning a sentence in the "Development" section of the ] page. The sentence I'm referring to is:<br/>"Regardless, this same strategy of creating a normally-unobtainable Pokémon was employed in later generations via Celebi, Deoxys, and Arceus respectively."<br/>When I saw this sentence initially, I thought it just needed to be rewritten ("respectively" doesn't belong in the sentence, for example). I then realized the sentence has absolutely nothing to do with the development of ''Red''/''Blue'', or even ''Red''/''Blue'' in general, so I removed it. Why do you say it belongs? -] (]) 11:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]| ]}}
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 01:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Good work on '']'', probably looking good for GA. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
|}


Thanks to recent expansion of the article, I'm thinking of nominating the article for Good Article class. What do you think? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Artichoker. I just don't think that sentence is relevant enough to belong in the article.
:First off, thanks for the barnstar; I really appreciate it! As for GA status, I would like to ask for you to hold off for now. I'm still in the midst of heavily expanding the article's production section and still have a ton more sources to sift through. If you would like to help, I also think the reception section could use some expanding, particularly the 'Awards and accolades'. I will also need to add a section to the lead talking about the reception, and then copywrite the prose of the article. Feel free to help me along the way! I hope to nominate the article for GA status when I am finished with these tasks in the coming several weeks. Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
::It's been a few days, and already the article is looking better than ever. Should I nominate it for GA now, or just for a peer review? Outside feedback could also be helpful in improving the article; in fact, the article has the potential for FA class. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 13:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
:::I would like to ask you to hold off on that for now. I will nominate the article for GA when I believe it is ready, and after I have finished making the improvements to the article. As I said before, I still have a few more sources to utilize for the production section, and then I also would like to further expand the reception section. That along with a major copyedit for the article are the main goals before I nominate the article for GA. But I agree with you that there could be potential for featured status in the future. Although I think some more pictures would need to be added, and admittedly, I am not too experienced with uploading images to Misplaced Pages. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 19:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


== List of Pokémon (1–51) ==
By the way, "respectively" is used when there are two lists within the same sentence that correlate to each other in the order in which their items appear. For example, if someone simply wrote, "Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina are on the covers of ''Diamond'', ''Pearl'', and ''Platinum''", then it implies that all three Pokémon are pictured on each cover. But, by adding "respectively" to the end of that sentence, it clarifies that Dialga = ''Diamond'', Palkia = ''Pearl'', and Giratina = ''Platinum''. However, if the sentence read, "Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina are on the covers of the fourth-generation games", then "respectively" wouldn't be used, as there's only one list in that sentence, and thus there are no individual items with which "Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina" can correlate. I know, it's kind of confusing. ; -) ] (]) 09:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 18:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


As you can see, the section is pretty clearly broken. I don't know what's causing it. I do know that my edit fixed it. &ndash;&nbsp;] (]) 20:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Artichoker. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner (I was busy becoming a ] addict). Anyway, I don't think the Celebi, Deoxys, and Arceus bit belongs because it doesn't enhance the reader's understanding of how ''Red'' and ''Blue'' were developed. ] is simply not the place for that information.
:Yep, you are correct. I had already reverted my original edit and am now investigating as to why the template is breaking for Zubat. Do you have any ideas as to why this could be happening? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 20:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
::Never mind, I ended up . It turned out to be a stray apostrophe at the end of the paragraph that messed everything up! Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 20:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


Again, thanks for your edits on Madoka (seems your activity has slowed down lately though, if you don't mind, I'll put the article for a peer review once you finish your contributions). Anyway, I noticed that user New Age Retro Hippie has been merging a number of articles on different Pokémon into the different lists of Pokémon. I'm curious as to where this was discussed, as I can't find any such discussion on ]. Could you link to the relevant discussion? Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Er, and about "respectively": as I pointed out in my (admittedly over-complicated) examples, it doesn't fit in that sentence because the generations aren't listed within the sentence. If you really want "respectively" in the sentence, then it should be written as follows: "This same strategy of creating a normally-unobtainable Pokémon was later employed in Generations II, III, and IV via Celebi, Deoxys, and Arceus, respectively."
:Yes, my activity has slowed down somewhat during these last few days because I am preparing to move to a new place and start a new job. However, I have a local draft of additional content that I am planning to add soon, after I am finished working on it. Don't worry, I still have plenty of contributions planned for the article to get it up to GA status in the upcoming weeks :) However, you are free to put it up for a peer review whenever you would like.


:Regarding the the merging of some of the individual Pokémon articles, I am not aware of any discussion that happened. However, I am not necessarily opposed to his actions, and think he was simply acting ]. Of course, if you disagree with any of these merges, I'd definitely recommend you contact him as well as initiate discussion on the article talk pages and/or ]. I would also participate in these discussions so that we could reach a consensus. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 17:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
By the way, I still think the sentence should be removed. I'm just clarifying how "respectively" should be used for your own wikibenefit. -] (]) 17:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
::Incidentally, it also appears that discussion is taking place at ]. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 17:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
:::Yes, and it's only going to grow. It looks like a notability discussion regarding a few ''Sonic'' characters is turning into something much larger – which I'm unhappy about on all counts but is the case. ] (]) 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
::::Indeed. I have been lurking on those Sonic discussions and must say that the points about notability regarding significant and dedicated coverage are very interesting and somewhat compelling. However, I am unsure myself whether there is enough independent coverage of these subjects to constitute adequate notability. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 21:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2==
P.S. I know wikibenefit isn't a real wikiword, and I know wikiword isn't a real, um... wikiterm, and I know wikiterm isn't, oh nevermind. ''';- }'''
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 18:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


== é e é e é e é e == == Apologies ==


I got mixed up and added it in without double-checking. --] (]) 10:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, Artichoker. You and I both know the only correct spelling is "Pokémon", not "Pokemon", "pokémon", or "pokemon", and certainly not "Poke'''man'''". Any Pokémon fan knows this, but the media apparently does not (even video game websites usually type "Pokemon"). They either don't know the correct spelling, or don't know how to type the ''é''. Anyway, I realize that many (if not most) sources use an incorrect spelling, but as Misplaced Pages is a tool for learning, I don't think we should use incorrect forms (except when used in quotations, which should always be followed by {{sic}}). Either we should go through each time Pokémon is misspelled in a reference and add {{sic}}, or simply fix the spelling. Thoughts? -] (]) 04:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 18:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


== It takes two to tango ==
Okay. I'm with you now on leaving all the ''Pokemon'' as is within references. However, there are two instances within the body of the article of ''Pokemon'' being used. They're both in a quote, so rather than change them to ''Pokémon'', they should both be followed by {{sic}}. -] (]) 16:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


I've contested your additions to the article. Do not give me a templated warning over this matter because you are as much in the wrong as I am for constantly acting without consensus.—] (]) 00:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
There's a reason I didn't use the Wikilinked {{sic}} for the second "Pokemon": ] says not to use the Wikilinked version when is used multiple times close together. -] (]) 16:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 18:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC) :I was simply following ]. For example, my first restoration of the content was due to what I thought was the end of the dispute after you admitted you had no policy arguments supporting your opinion. I then discussed further and restored the information with an additional, independent source. You however, have continually reverted three times without any concrete discussion besides what appears to be your own opinion on what policy "should" be, but not what it actually is. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
::No, you were edit warring because I reverted your bold addition and began a discussion. Just because you do not accept my arguments does not mean you get to restore the content. And I've since pointed out that the video game project guidelines exclude everything you have been using as a source. Not to mention one discussion at AFD does not constitute acceptance as a reliable source.—] (]) 00:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:::Have you read our ] that you continue to talk about? As I show , this particularly GameSpot source completely complies as a reliable source under our WikiProject. Also, I am very puzzled at your remark about SlashGear. I very clearly linked you to of SlashGear which demonstrates that it has editorial oversight and is a reliable source. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
::::So long as either of them cite Serebii or the "leaks" neither are reliable sources under these circumstances. This information will be made officially public in two days. There is no reason Misplaced Pages has to report on it when the sourcing is questionable as I have been saying.—] (]) 00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::You continue to say they can't be reliable because of "Serebii" or "leaks". But where is your policy-based argument to support their disinclusion? Once again, my edits are in-line with ], but your statements seem to continue to be a matter of your own opinion on which sources are reliable and which ones aren't. Once again, I am looking for ''actual Misplaced Pages policy'' on the merits of your arguments. Not just an opinion that "because it's a leak, we can't include it." Why not? As long as the source is reliable and the information is verifiable, why ''can't'' we include it? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
::::::If we already deem one website an unreliable source, why should other websites reporting the content and citing that website be considered reliable sources for this information?—] (]) 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::::Please see ]'s reply which I believe perfectly answers your question as to why it can still be reliable. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::::::He is still incorrect in taking Gamespot as a reliable source in this matter. We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable reporting on information from what are internally considered to be unreliable sources in the past. This situation is no different.—] (]) 00:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
::::::::::"We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable..." Why do you continue citing these vague assertions as evidence without providing a single link to previous precedent or existing Misplaced Pages policy? Once again, it really just seems like this is all solely based on an opinion that you hold. In addition, please see my reply . ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


== Have a second? == == Madoka again ==


Well, the peer review for Madoka is winding down (no comments in two weeks), and good comments have been given. Hopefully someone could close the PR soon, as I'm itching to start a peer review for ].
Hello again, Artichoker! Er, I have a favor to ask of you if you have the time. Could you take a look at the ] article? I've done extensive editing to it since early February and I would like your input on how it looks now compared to before I made my first edit. I think all the game descriptions still need to be rewritten, and I think the picture should be replaced with a more professional-looking one. What says you? Any constructive criticism is appreciated. Thanks! -] (]) 17:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 00:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


Anyway, looking at the article again, I don't really agree with the idea that the development section is too long. On the contrary, it's pretty well developed for an anime article. Pretty much the only thing that needs to be addressed now is more sources: I agree that the article relies a bit too much on ANN and could use other sources, especially Japanese ones. Hopefully you can go back to your previous level of editing soon. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 04:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks again for opening that PR. I agree with you that the production section is definitely not too long. And yes, I think a major thing that needs to be addressed in the article is it's reliance on ANN as a source (it seems about half of the sources are from that site). That will need to be remedied, and then I am still in the process of rewriting the Broadcast and Distribution section and the Other Media section. Finally, the reception section needs more detail (for which I have already done some research and collected more sources; I just need to transfer them into the prose) and I believe the article will then be ready for GA once those issues have been addressed and I plan to nominate it as soon as that happens. Hopefully I can get my Misplaced Pages workflow started back up again, as I am wrapping up my real-life transition to a new city. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 04:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


::Thanks for the reply. By the way, this is off-topic, but could you take a look at the article ]? It's the article I work on the most, since it's the article of my favorite singer. Could you leave me feedback on my talk page on how the article can be improved? Right now it's B-class (but honestly I feel the article's structure and prose need some work), but I feel that with the right amount of sourcing and good enough prose it could end up being a GA. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
== Pokemon Platinum AU ==


::Also, I forgot to mention this, but the PR mentioned having a "Themes" section. To my knowledge, the only anime GA with a "themes" section is ], so I don't think it's that necessary. However, if there are reliable sources that explain the themes used in Madoka, then it's fine to include them. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Here what about this http://gonintendo.com/?p=76670 <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 00:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


==Talkback==
== Image upload help! ==
{{talkback|Narutolovehinata5|Mami Kawada|ts=02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)}}
] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


== wisconsin ==
Hello, Artichoker. I have two images I want to upload, but I'm having trouble figuring out the copyright status. One of them is of a Virtual Boy controller and the other is of a Pokémon mini. The Nintendo logo is prominently shown on both, which is obviously trademarked, but I took both photographs myself, so do I own the copyright? Or does Nintendo?<br>I've found seemingly contradictory information on this: the Wii article has nine pictures, eight of which are from Wikimedia Commons, but Commons' policy doesn't allow copyrighted images to be uploaded. So, are my photographs okay for Commons or should they be uploaded directly to Misplaced Pages using free-use rationale? Thanks in advance. -] <sup>] • ]</sup> 03:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC) <br>PS: I realize there's already a picture of a VB controller and Pokémon mini, but mine are much more professional-looking.
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 19:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
::Hey, Artichoker. Thanks for pointing me to ]. Someone there answered my question and I uploaded my two pictures, then affixed them to their respective articles. Thanks again. -] <sup>] • ]</sup> 02:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
:::My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 19:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


Thank you. I didn't realize the story had been updated and revised downward. It said 63 counties when I grabbed it (which would match the URL), but of course your revert was correct with the story as it reads right now. Thank you! ] (]) 01:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
==Userpage==
Excellent work on that revamping. ] (]) 00:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC) :No problem. Thanks for your help! ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 00:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1==
==The ] Newsletter (March 2009)==
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20090401}}
::*<small>Newsletter delivery by <font face="Verdana">]</font> 16:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)</small>


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014 ==
== Ezra Klein quote on Conservapedia article ==


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20140702}}
My initial edit was kind of randomly made, and I'm surprised it got any pushback, so I'm half making this comment out of curiosity. What is it, precisely, that the Klein comment adds to a reader's understanding of Conservapedia? Klein's comment, about half of which is a hat tip to DeGroot, appears to me contentless snark. About all I can get out of it that Klein and DeGroot are derisive of Conservapedia. Nor is it clearly tied to the preceding sentence. If I didn't get it, I presume that it won't be of much value to others. But I'm interested in hearing the other side of it, so hit me back here or my talk page when you get a chance. Cheers, ] (]) 14:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
] (]) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=615133799 -->
::Dunno if you have a preference for keeping these conversations in one place, but I'll reply here for the sake of reciprocity. You say the quote is "relevant because it provides third-party coverage" of the subject. This doesn't quite address my point that the coverage in question is not very illuminating. And you say both sentences relate to religion, but here's the exact quote from Klein's column as cited in the article now: "As Daniel DeGroot notes, you've got to wonder which 'unreasonable' explanations they rejected when formulating that entry." What explanations? There's no ''there'' there, you know what I mean? I don't have the time now, but I think we could find something with a little more context. Does this make sense? Cheers, ] (]) 17:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


== Some stroopwafels for you! ==
==Happy Easter!==
]
On behalf of ], I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 06:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks, I appreciate it. Happy Easter/spring holiday to you as well. Cheers, ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
== Diamond, Pearl, & Platinum info ==
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your work on List of Pokemon Anime Characters, as I have been absent for a few weeks to revert the rampant fankruft and original research. ] (]) 12:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you! Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


== Kawashita yakusoku wasurenai yo me wo toji tashikameru~ ==
Hey Artichoker there was a ] on the Wikiproject that you might find interesting; while looking for information about Ivysaur, a user found an interview with the game and music directors of Diamond, Pearl, and Platinum. I'm not sure how to copy and paste it here (the link leads straight to a ZIP file), but it has some really good information on the development fo the games, the music aspect especially, that might be worth inclusion. You're the user who edits the video game articles most frequently, so I figured I'd best bring it to your attention. Cheers, ] (]) 23:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 00:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


Thanks for nominating ] for good article status. Unfortunately, ] seems to have quite a bit of backlog at the moment, so like the other pending anime and manga GANs it could take a long while before any comments are made (I think there's one GAN from April that has yet to have any discussion started). Is it allowed to contact an experienced but uninvolved editor to take a look at the article and ask for comments? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 10:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
== For me? Thank you! ==
:No problem. As for the backlog, you're definitely right. GAN has had a backlog for as long as I can remember. In fact, if I get some more time, I'd like to start reviewing some of the older GANs and help reduce that backlog. As for my nomination of ''Madoka Magica'', I think we should just be patient. It'll be reviewed some time, and if that's a couple months down the road, that's okay. I certainly feel more sorry for the editors that have nominations still sitting there from like February. Hopefully I can help reduce that waiting time for them. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 19:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
::Well, no one's starting the discussion yet. Can you ask someone to start one for Madoka and the other pending anime GAs? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure if we need to solicit anyone. Generally how the GA process works is you nominate the article GAN and then you wait for a reviewer to decide to review the article. GAN has a huge backlog though, so sometimes these things can take time. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


== ] lead section ==
Hey Artichoker! A barnstar for me!?! Really? Well thank you! You don't know how much it means to me for an experienced editor like yourself to acknowledge my efforts.


Hi, I've been expecting this article to be an ] already. Can you add to the lead section a paragraph about the production and development of the ''Madoka Magica'' anime? That way the lead feels more complete. <s>}I]&#124;]I{</s> 01:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you know this, but I've looked up to you since I began editing here on Misplaced Pages, as evidenced by my posts on your talk page asking for your help or your opinion. I really appreciate my anti-vandalism barnstar. I hope you don't mind, but I moved it up near the top of my talk page, where it will stay even when I inevitably start archiving my talk. I really, really appreciate my barnstar. You more than made my day. -]&nbsp;<sup>]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]</sup> 01:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah, I will do that. Probably won't be able to get to it today, but tomorrow I will try and add a paragraph to the lead about production. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
::Thanks, I'm happy! ] <s>}I]&#124;]I{</s> 00:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:::I wish you can finish that paragraph before the GA review starts. How come you didn't edit for a week before today.<s>}I]&#124;]I{</s> 02:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
::::Sorry things have been hectic. I'll get it added in there. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


==Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 14:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->


==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2==
] has given you a ]! Bubble teas promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking! <br />
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Sorry for asking for more comments, but since, per your suggestion, I've put it up for peer review, comments are appreciated. Thank you. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->
:Thanks for letting me know. I'll try to get to it, along with my other obligations, this weekend. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
::Well, since no one has added to the discussion yet, comments are welcome. Also, good job on Madoka, as always. Maybe you can try improving the other articles covered by ], such as the articles on SAO, Love Live, and others. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
:::Thanks! I would love to improve more anime articles, but that will have to come in due time. I'm currently in a real crunch. Things should hopefully clear up in a few weeks though. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 22:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014 ==
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{tlsu|User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
{{clear}}
</div><!-- User:Download/Bubble tea -->


==A note regarding the ] Newsletter== {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20141001}}
] (]) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Due to an apparent lack of interest, the ] will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009 and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at ].
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=627494845 -->
:—VG Newsletter Contributors
::*<small>Notice delivery by –<font face="verdana" color="black">]</font> ] 14:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)</small>


==Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC==
== My proposal ==
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 10:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->


==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3==
Hey Artichoker. Did you see ]? What do you think about it? -]&nbsp;<sup>]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]</sup> 12:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 05:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see-->


== Your ] nomination of ]==
== D/P FA ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 04:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


== Your ] nomination of ]==
Ok, there has been talk at ] about D/P going for FA,but before I do anything, I would like your permission, since you have done the majority of edits for this page.Thanks and Peace Out--]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 13:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 18:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
::Also, we would like your opinion on ].Thanks man.--]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 17:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
:::My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 19:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


== Your ] nomination of ]==
== A ref I found, useful for PKMN R/B ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 00:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
It's something not covered by the article, but on Satoshi Tajiri notes '']'' was one of the influences behind the Pokemon games being on the game boy, in a nutshell seeing the game in action showing him the Game Boy could handle more than just action games. I started to work the reference into '']'', but since I know the article's your work you might be better at weaving the information into what's there.--] (]) 07:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 23:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
Related, but went on a dead run and managed to cook ] up. It's still got some ways to go, but it should satisfy ] enough to get out there for now. What do you think?--] (]) 08:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ], right? Congratulations! ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 01:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
|}
:Much appreciated! I'm just so glad the article of my favorite series is now a GA. I thank you for all of your help along the way. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
::You're welcome. By the way, do you have any more suggestions for Mami's page? I plan to nominate it for GAN once the peer review is finished. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 04:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
:::Nothing came to mind. I think any changes left to be made will be minor and can easily be accomplished during the GAN process. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 05:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
::::Nothing I did not expect from that successful GA nomination. And by the way, I've actually grown tired of ''Madoka Magica'' (because that anime was not horrifying to me as everyone thought it is). But don't worry, I'm usually enjoying happiness. ] <s>}I]&#124;]I{</s> 07:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
:::::I liked the visuals in ''Madoka Magica'' though. <s>}I]&#124;]I{</s> 22:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014 ==
== '''NOTICE''' to all members of ] ==


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150107}}
Following a discussion on ], we will be updating ] list of participants. To do this, all users previously listed as "Active" have been moved to the "Inactive" list; after this change anyone may add/re-add their name to the "Active" participants list. As your name was one of those on the ] list, I am notifying you in case your active interest remains. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to keep our list of active participants as accurate and up-to-date as possible. ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 04:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
] (]) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=637863057 -->


== So I just decided to check in on my old[REDACTED] user page: ==
==RfD nomination of ]==
I have nominated {{lw|SPEED}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 13:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


And I saw . I've checked the user's talk page, and they appear to have never even been disciplined for this, and instead found messages about what a valued editor they were. I know this is extremely, extremely delayed notice, but...what the actual hell is going on?<small>] ]</small> 02:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Re: Citing quotations ==
:Their contributions last back to 2006, so this wasn't some random flyby troll that immediately shaped up once they were informed of the rules, either. This appears to have been an incredibly blatant, malicious attack.<small>] ]</small> 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::Nevermind. It looks like he's stopped editing anyway so there's nothing to do remedy-wise. Just kind of confirms my impression of wikipedia, I guess.<small>] ]</small> 02:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Hi {{ping|KrytenKoro}}. I actually did warn the user for that particular edit of vandalism . In any case, it's good to hear from you. It's certainly been a while. Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::::Huh. Okay. I was confused by that, since he'd been a user since 2006, but okay. Thanks!<small>] ]</small> 04:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


== Re: MissingNo. ==
Here: ] :) <b>]]</b> 15:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
::I'm not sure. I actually just recently found out about it by a user who reviewed one of my GAs. I think it might be a good idea to ask about it at the talkpage of ]. <b>]]</b> 16:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:::My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


I ended up reverting it, but only because the information he added is actually in the article, in the section directly above it. I'm wary about going into further detail regarding the glitch simply because that was one of the harder bits to 'lock down' during the FA, as it was up in the air just how much information someone would need to know on how to trigger the glitch for a reader completely unfamiliar with the game or even gaming itself.--] (]) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
== Re:Game Informer ==


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015 ==
Hey Artichoker. Yeah, I have that issue and I'm going to add to the Reception's prose in a little while. Right now I'm trying to figure out how to properly add ''Nintendo Power''{{'}}s score, as their old system had five editors rate the game (do I average the scores together?). Of course, I'll add NP's two cents to the prose too. Cheers. -]] 16:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150401}}
== I made a reply to your comment ==
] (]) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I made a reply to your comment at ]. Thanx! ]<sup> '''.''' ]</sup> 23:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=645375747 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015 ==
== Italicizing "Pokémon" ==


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150701}}
Hey Artichoker. Are you sure it shouldn't be italicized when referring to the franchise as a whole? I'm not sure one way or the other, I'm just going off of what I've seen throughout Misplaced Pages. For example, the first line of all the species articles (except Mewtwo, for some reason) say something like "...is one of the fictional species of Pokémon creatures from the multi-billion-dollar ''Pokémon'' media franchise...". It doesn't really matter to me which way we go, but it should be consistent throughout Misplaced Pages. -]] 19:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
] (]) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 19:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=657410093 -->
::Hey man, I really, really don't want to see you get blocked for your reversions at ], so let's talk this out, okay? -]] 23:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure if I want to get involved, but from the way I'm looking at it, it does make sense to italicize Pokémon when it refers to the franchise as a whole, and not when it's referring to the noun (e.g. in Mew's case, "legendary Pokémon" is not italicized). ''']''' <sup>]•]</sup> 23:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
::::Why does it make sense to italicize it when it's referring to the franchise? Why not italicize Google and Wal-mart too? They're franchises as well. ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 01:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::I would say mainly because Pokémon can be considered a special case. With two meanings to the word, it makes things a little bit clearer as to whether a certain utterance of Pokémon means the franchise or the noun. Besides, we already italicize all the game names and everything like that, so it makes a bit more sense. ''']''' <sup>]•]</sup> 02:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
::::::I still don't see what makes Pokémon any more special than Google. Clearness does not excuse incorrect grammar. The game names are correctly italicized just like all other video games, and likewise, when referring to the franchise, it should not be italicized just like all other franchises. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::::If I may interject to respond to Chris, that's a seperate issue from a franchise; games, albums, scientific names, and film titles are always in italics, it's just the correct grammatical way of doing it. ''Pokémon Red'' the game is italicized, but Pokémon the franchise is not. ] (]) 02:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
::::::::For the sake of keeping discussion on this issue together, let's continue this at ]. -]] 03:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015 ==
== IGN guides ==


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20151007}} ] (]) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I looked at the previous FAC and noticed the problem with those guides, but it's a very simple one. The author of those are the editorial staff of IGN, but the author parameter was omitted from the references at the time of the FAC. Simply adding it in should solve the problem as it can be confirmed by the (they initially developed it to require registration as well, but undid that years later). Just toss "author=Staff" or "author=IGN Staff" in those refs and that'll fix your problems in a jiffy.--] (]) 04:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=674815859 -->
:My reply . ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 17:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==
==The ] Newsletter (Q2 2009)==
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20090701}}
::*<small>Newsletter delivery by <font face="Verdana">]</font> 15:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)</small>


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
== re:Reverts ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015 ==
Hey man, thanks for backing-up my edits. In case you were wondering what edit of his(?) I reverted, it was in the ] article. The user later re-added the information with a reliable source, so all is now well. Cheers! -]] 18:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160106}}
== Paul McCartney ==
] (]) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=687820424 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016 ==
You deleted the fair-use photo of Dot Rhone, who was McCartney's first serious girlfriend in Liverpool, whom he made pregnant, and then secured the blessing of McCartney’s father for their wedding. Rhone later had a miscarriage, which meant McCartney would break off their relationship. This epsiode is rather important, one would think.


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160406}}
As Linda McCartney and Heather Mills have free-use photos, which show them both to be attractive women, it is of paramount importance to the article that a photo of Rhone is included, as (to be honest) she wasn’t.
] (]) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=713035266 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016 ==
To delete the one fair-use photo in a very large article full of free-use photos is, to my mind, nit-picking and bordering on a personal vendetta against McCartney himself. I'm sure you have your reasons, which you will no doubt link to Misplaced Pages pages that support you. I wish you well. --] (]) 22:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160703}} ] (]) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
== re:re ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=728990546 -->


==Awards==
Wow, you're quick! I was going to leave you a message letting you know.
Hey, so, I edited the wiki and of course I provided a link since you told me to do so and there are those idiots undoing my edit with no explanation/reason. Could you tell them to stop already? Here's the link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-07-09/yumiko-kawahara-madoka-magica-win-sense-of-gender-awards <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
I'm excited for the flagged reversions test. Hopefully it'll change my mind about leaving. -]] 07:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
:Sorry for leaving such a brief message last night, I was very tired.
:I don't know what I'm going to do now. There were a few times before where I almost left Misplaced Pages. This was mostly due to the ridiculously lenient policy towards vandals (if it were up to me they'd be blocked for a week for their second offense). Maybe I was jumping the gun by proclaiming my semi-retirement, so for now I'm on a wiki-break for an undetermined amount of time. I'm very, very sorry for all the extra reverting duties this places on you and the others at the Project; that is the primary reason I decided against walking away all those times before. Cheers, and happy editing. ''':- )''' ← <small>(a rare smiley from Sesu)</small> -]] 04:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
==Happy ]!==
Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of ], I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 21:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Apology, but my concerns remain ==
You are right; I was mistaken. You undertook a short discussion on the subject. Try ] or ] if you laboring under the mistaken impression that your discussion sprints to AfD are a thorough discussion. However, ANI was not at that time a threat, it was a promise. AfD without discussion is intolerable. AfD with a short discussion is tolerable, but not good form. The discussion was just a rehash of what was said on the revert summaries, and your actions were similar to AfDing as edit war; you had very little to say in the discussion, and your decision to AfD was unilateral, and entirely without consensus. I have no reason to believe you have learned from your mistakes; I expect we will be crossing paths again. ] (]) 01:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 01:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
::i have commented on anarchangel's talk page and am just letting you know, happy editing! --&#65279;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 14:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
== Thank you for making ] a success! ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/26&oldid=750600328 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016 ==
Thank you again for your support of the Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at ] with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20161003}}
*] for Did You Know nominations
] (]) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
*] for Good Article nominations
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=753545140 -->
*] for Featured Article nominations
*] for Featured List nominations
*] for Featured Picture nominations


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016 ==
Again, thank you for making this event a success! --].].] 02:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20170102}}
== Just a shout ==
] (]) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=753545140 -->
== Geoff Iddison listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Geoff Iddison'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 10:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017 ==
I went ahead and nominated '']'' for A-class, it'll probably be a good long while before it gets two editors to give it a once over but it should pass and bump it up a notch on the assessment scale.--] (]) 19:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 20:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
::Delayed reply (been busy as heck x_X), but you might find Google Books to be useful to get an idea what to expect from the book. Its search function is currently a lot more useful than it was, since even for pages it doesn't actively show it will give a chunk of the surrounding paragraph(s) for what you search for in the book. It's damn handy for cultural impact information, that's for sure.--] (]) 13:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20170402}}
== Re:FR/LG ==
] (]) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=771657781 -->


== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017 ==
It's honestly worth a shot, FAC's still part crapshoot but the article looks pretty damn good all around and the sources stick. I'd say give it a go, couldn't hurt to try it.--] (]) 00:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
:My reply . ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


<div style="width:100%; text-align: left;">
== Vandalism ==
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div>
<div style="float: center;">
<span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017</span> <br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">


<big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br>
Thanks for fixing the vandalism on my talk page. ] (]) 23:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
As of Q2 ], the project has:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
* 211 ]
* 70 ]
* 11 ]
* 1 ]
{{Col-2}}
* 28 ]
* 1,172 ]
* 23 ]
{{Col-end}}
----
<big>'''Content'''</big>
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
<!--*]-->
{{Col-2}}
*Feature: ]
*Feature: ]
<!--*]-->
{{Col-end}}
----
{{Collapsible list
|title=<big>Project Navigation</big>
|1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;">
;VG Project Main pages
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;VG Project Departments
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;&nbsp;
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
</div>}}
<div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))</small></div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Distribution requested by User:Thibbs at WT:MMS -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=789183807 -->

== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20171001}}
] (]) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=801426750 -->

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=813406620 -->

== Madoka FAC ==

Hello. I've now nominated ] for FA status, would it be okay with you to be a co-nominator of the nomination? Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
:Naruto, see my on the nomination page. I don't think nominating for FAC is appropriate at this time. What do you believe has significantly changed about the article since and how have those original concerns been addressed? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 -->

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 -->

== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter/20190707}}
] (]) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=905749739 -->

== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20191006}}
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=916242202 -->

== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200105}}
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=930444237 -->

== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200405}}
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=946217842 -->

== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200705}}

03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=964928886 -->

== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020 ==

{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20201004}}

] (]) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=980684277 -->

== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020 ==

<div style="width:100%; text-align: left;">
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div>
<div style="float: center;">
<span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020</span> <br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

<big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br>
As of Q4 ], the project has:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
* 239 ]
* 88 ]
* 10 ]
{{Col-2}}
* 33 ]
* 1,650 ]
* 28 ]
{{Col-end}}
----
<big>'''Content'''</big>
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
*]
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
*]
{{Col-end}}
----
{{Collapsible list
|title=<big>Project Navigation</big>
|1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;">
;VG Project Main pages
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;VG Project Departments
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;&nbsp;
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
</div>}}
<div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))</small></div>
</div>
</div>
--] (]) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Path slopu@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=994482657#Readership -->

== The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021 ==

<div style="width:100%; text-align: left;">
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div>
<div style="float: center;">
<span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021</span> <br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

<big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br>
As of Q1 ], the project has:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
* 241 ]
* 89 ]
* 10 ]
{{Col-2}}
* 34 ]
* 1,684 ]
* 31 ]
{{Col-end}}
----
<big>'''Content'''</big>
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
*]
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
{{Col-end}}
----
{{Collapsible list
|title=<big>Project Navigation</big>
|1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;">
;VG Project Main pages
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;VG Project Departments
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;&nbsp;
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
</div>}}
<div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))</small></div>
</div>
</div>
-- ] (]) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Biodev@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=1016803813 -->

== Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter ==

<div style="width:100%; text-align: left;">
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div>
<div style="float: center;">
<span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023</span> <br />
<span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ]</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

<big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br>
As of Q4 ], the project has:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
* 259 ]
* 95 ]
* 10 ]
{{Col-2}}
* 35 ]
* 1,862 ]
* 31 ]
{{Col-end}}
----
<big>'''Content'''</big>
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
{{Col-2}}
*]
*]
{{Col-end}}
----
{{Collapsible list
|title=<big>Project Navigation</big>
|1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;">
;VG Project Main pages
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;VG Project Departments
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
;&nbsp;
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
*] &ndash; ]
</div>}}
<div style="text-align: center;">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''</div>
</div>
</div>
Delivered by: ] (]) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=1143529343 -->

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->

== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

Take the survey ''''''.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 -->

Latest revision as of 00:39, 13 November 2024

Archiving icon
Archives
  1. November 2007 - May 2008
  2. June 2008
  3. July 2008
  4. August 2008
  5. September 2008 - February 2009
  6. March 2009 - 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Madoka work, and GA

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Good work on Puella Magi Madoka Magica, probably looking good for GA. Narutolovehinata5 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks to recent expansion of the article, I'm thinking of nominating the article for Good Article class. What do you think? Narutolovehinata5 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

First off, thanks for the barnstar; I really appreciate it! As for GA status, I would like to ask for you to hold off for now. I'm still in the midst of heavily expanding the article's production section and still have a ton more sources to sift through. If you would like to help, I also think the reception section could use some expanding, particularly the 'Awards and accolades'. I will also need to add a section to the lead talking about the reception, and then copywrite the prose of the article. Feel free to help me along the way! I hope to nominate the article for GA status when I am finished with these tasks in the coming several weeks. Cheers, Artichoker 23:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
It's been a few days, and already the article is looking better than ever. Should I nominate it for GA now, or just for a peer review? Outside feedback could also be helpful in improving the article; in fact, the article has the potential for FA class. Narutolovehinata5 13:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I would like to ask you to hold off on that for now. I will nominate the article for GA when I believe it is ready, and after I have finished making the improvements to the article. As I said before, I still have a few more sources to utilize for the production section, and then I also would like to further expand the reception section. That along with a major copyedit for the article are the main goals before I nominate the article for GA. But I agree with you that there could be potential for featured status in the future. Although I think some more pictures would need to be added, and admittedly, I am not too experienced with uploading images to Misplaced Pages. Artichoker 19:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

List of Pokémon (1–51)

As you can see, the section as you've left it is pretty clearly broken. I don't know what's causing it. I do know that my edit fixed it. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Yep, you are correct. I had already reverted my original edit and am now investigating as to why the template is breaking for Zubat. Do you have any ideas as to why this could be happening? Artichoker 20:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Never mind, I ended up fixing it. It turned out to be a stray apostrophe at the end of the paragraph that messed everything up! Cheers, Artichoker 20:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Again, thanks for your edits on Madoka (seems your activity has slowed down lately though, if you don't mind, I'll put the article for a peer review once you finish your contributions). Anyway, I noticed that user New Age Retro Hippie has been merging a number of articles on different Pokémon into the different lists of Pokémon. I'm curious as to where this was discussed, as I can't find any such discussion on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pokémon. Could you link to the relevant discussion? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, my activity has slowed down somewhat during these last few days because I am preparing to move to a new place and start a new job. However, I have a local draft of additional content that I am planning to add soon, after I am finished working on it. Don't worry, I still have plenty of contributions planned for the article to get it up to GA status in the upcoming weeks :) However, you are free to put it up for a peer review whenever you would like.
Regarding the the merging of some of the individual Pokémon articles, I am not aware of any discussion that happened. However, I am not necessarily opposed to his actions, and think he was simply acting boldly. Of course, if you disagree with any of these merges, I'd definitely recommend you contact him as well as initiate discussion on the article talk pages and/or the wikiproject talk page. I would also participate in these discussions so that we could reach a consensus. Artichoker 17:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Incidentally, it also appears that discussion is taking place at User talk:Tezero#Pokémon. Artichoker 17:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, and it's only going to grow. It looks like a notability discussion regarding a few Sonic characters is turning into something much larger – which I'm unhappy about on all counts but is the case. Tezero (talk) 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Indeed. I have been lurking on those Sonic discussions and must say that the points about notability regarding significant and dedicated coverage are very interesting and somewhat compelling. However, I am unsure myself whether there is enough independent coverage of these subjects to constitute adequate notability. Artichoker 21:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

I got mixed up and added it in without double-checking. --occono (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

It takes two to tango

I've contested your additions to the article. Do not give me a templated warning over this matter because you are as much in the wrong as I am for constantly acting without consensus.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I was simply following WP:BRD. For example, my first restoration of the content was due to what I thought was the end of the dispute after you admitted you had no policy arguments supporting your opinion. I then discussed further and restored the information with an additional, independent source. You however, have continually reverted three times without any concrete discussion besides what appears to be your own opinion on what policy "should" be, but not what it actually is. Artichoker 00:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
No, you were edit warring because I reverted your bold addition and began a discussion. Just because you do not accept my arguments does not mean you get to restore the content. And I've since pointed out that the video game project guidelines exclude everything you have been using as a source. Not to mention one discussion at AFD does not constitute acceptance as a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Have you read our internal guidelines that you continue to talk about? As I show here, this particularly GameSpot source completely complies as a reliable source under our WikiProject. Also, I am very puzzled at your remark about SlashGear. I very clearly linked you to the editorial page of SlashGear which demonstrates that it has editorial oversight and is a reliable source. Artichoker 00:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
So long as either of them cite Serebii or the "leaks" neither are reliable sources under these circumstances. This information will be made officially public in two days. There is no reason Misplaced Pages has to report on it when the sourcing is questionable as I have been saying.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
You continue to say they can't be reliable because of "Serebii" or "leaks". But where is your policy-based argument to support their disinclusion? Once again, my edits are in-line with WP:V, but your statements seem to continue to be a matter of your own opinion on which sources are reliable and which ones aren't. Once again, I am looking for actual Misplaced Pages policy on the merits of your arguments. Not just an opinion that "because it's a leak, we can't include it." Why not? As long as the source is reliable and the information is verifiable, why can't we include it? Artichoker 00:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
If we already deem one website an unreliable source, why should other websites reporting the content and citing that website be considered reliable sources for this information?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Please see hahnchen's reply here which I believe perfectly answers your question as to why it can still be reliable. Artichoker 00:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
He is still incorrect in taking Gamespot as a reliable source in this matter. We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable reporting on information from what are internally considered to be unreliable sources in the past. This situation is no different.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
"We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable..." Why do you continue citing these vague assertions as evidence without providing a single link to previous precedent or existing Misplaced Pages policy? Once again, it really just seems like this is all solely based on an opinion that you hold. In addition, please see my reply here. Artichoker 00:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Madoka again

Well, the peer review for Madoka is winding down (no comments in two weeks), and good comments have been given. Hopefully someone could close the PR soon, as I'm itching to start a peer review for ClariS.

Anyway, looking at the article again, I don't really agree with the idea that the development section is too long. On the contrary, it's pretty well developed for an anime article. Pretty much the only thing that needs to be addressed now is more sources: I agree that the article relies a bit too much on ANN and could use other sources, especially Japanese ones. Hopefully you can go back to your previous level of editing soon. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 04:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again for opening that PR. I agree with you that the production section is definitely not too long. And yes, I think a major thing that needs to be addressed in the article is it's reliance on ANN as a source (it seems about half of the sources are from that site). That will need to be remedied, and then I am still in the process of rewriting the Broadcast and Distribution section and the Other Media section. Finally, the reception section needs more detail (for which I have already done some research and collected more sources; I just need to transfer them into the prose) and I believe the article will then be ready for GA once those issues have been addressed and I plan to nominate it as soon as that happens. Hopefully I can get my Misplaced Pages workflow started back up again, as I am wrapping up my real-life transition to a new city. Artichoker 04:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. By the way, this is off-topic, but could you take a look at the article Mami Kawada? It's the article I work on the most, since it's the article of my favorite singer. Could you leave me feedback on my talk page on how the article can be improved? Right now it's B-class (but honestly I feel the article's structure and prose need some work), but I feel that with the right amount of sourcing and good enough prose it could end up being a GA. Narutolovehinata5 08:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, I forgot to mention this, but the PR mentioned having a "Themes" section. To my knowledge, the only anime GA with a "themes" section is Neon Genesis Evangelion, so I don't think it's that necessary. However, if there are reliable sources that explain the themes used in Madoka, then it's fine to include them. Narutolovehinata5 08:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Artichoker. You have new messages at Narutolovehinata5's talk page.
Message added 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

wisconsin

Thank you. I didn't realize the story had been updated and revised downward. It said 63 counties when I grabbed it (which would match the URL), but of course your revert was correct with the story as it reads right now. Thank you! 2601:4:1B80:156:41F2:12F8:5E6C:197A (talk) 01:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for your help! Artichoker 02:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thanks for your work on List of Pokemon Anime Characters, as I have been absent for a few weeks to revert the rampant fankruft and original research. NathanWubs (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Cheers, Artichoker 23:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Kawashita yakusoku wasurenai yo me wo toji tashikameru~

Thanks for nominating Puella Magi Madoka Magica for good article status. Unfortunately, WP:GAN seems to have quite a bit of backlog at the moment, so like the other pending anime and manga GANs it could take a long while before any comments are made (I think there's one GAN from April that has yet to have any discussion started). Is it allowed to contact an experienced but uninvolved editor to take a look at the article and ask for comments? Narutolovehinata5 10:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

No problem. As for the backlog, you're definitely right. GAN has had a backlog for as long as I can remember. In fact, if I get some more time, I'd like to start reviewing some of the older GANs and help reduce that backlog. As for my nomination of Madoka Magica, I think we should just be patient. It'll be reviewed some time, and if that's a couple months down the road, that's okay. I certainly feel more sorry for the editors that have nominations still sitting there from like February. Hopefully I can help reduce that waiting time for them. Artichoker 19:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, no one's starting the discussion yet. Can you ask someone to start one for Madoka and the other pending anime GAs? Narutolovehinata5 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if we need to solicit anyone. Generally how the GA process works is you nominate the article GAN and then you wait for a reviewer to decide to review the article. GAN has a huge backlog though, so sometimes these things can take time. Artichoker 03:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Puella Magi Madoka Magica lead section

Hi, I've been expecting this article to be an WP:GAN already. Can you add to the lead section a paragraph about the production and development of the Madoka Magica anime? That way the lead feels more complete. }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 01:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I will do that. Probably won't be able to get to it today, but tomorrow I will try and add a paragraph to the lead about production. Artichoker 23:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm happy! =D }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 00:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I wish you can finish that paragraph before the GA review starts. How come you didn't edit for a week before today.}IMr*|(60nna)I{ 02:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry things have been hectic. I'll get it added in there. Artichoker 03:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 14:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2. Sorry for asking for more comments, but since, per your suggestion, I've put it up for peer review, comments are appreciated. Thank you. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 08:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll try to get to it, along with my other obligations, this weekend. Artichoker 00:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, since no one has added to the discussion yet, comments are welcome. Also, good job on Madoka, as always. Maybe you can try improving the other articles covered by WP:ANIME, such as the articles on SAO, Love Live, and others. Narutolovehinata5 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I would love to improve more anime articles, but that will have to come in due time. I'm currently in a real crunch. Things should hopefully clear up in a few weeks though. Artichoker 22:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 10:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 05:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 04:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica

The article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Puella Magi Madoka Magica for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica

The article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Puella Magi Madoka Magica for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
You already know what this barnstar is for, right? Congratulations! Narutolovehinata5 01:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Much appreciated! I'm just so glad the article of my favorite series is now a GA. I thank you for all of your help along the way. Artichoker 02:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. By the way, do you have any more suggestions for Mami's page? I plan to nominate it for GAN once the peer review is finished. Narutolovehinata5 04:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Nothing came to mind. I think any changes left to be made will be minor and can easily be accomplished during the GAN process. Artichoker 05:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Nothing I did not expect from that successful GA nomination. And by the way, I've actually grown tired of Madoka Magica (because that anime was not horrifying to me as everyone thought it is). But don't worry, I'm usually enjoying happiness. =D }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 07:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I liked the visuals in Madoka Magica though. }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 22:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

So I just decided to check in on my old[REDACTED] user page:

And I saw this. I've checked the user's talk page, and they appear to have never even been disciplined for this, and instead found messages about what a valued editor they were. I know this is extremely, extremely delayed notice, but...what the actual hell is going on?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Their contributions last back to 2006, so this wasn't some random flyby troll that immediately shaped up once they were informed of the rules, either. This appears to have been an incredibly blatant, malicious attack.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind. It looks like he's stopped editing anyway so there's nothing to do remedy-wise. Just kind of confirms my impression of wikipedia, I guess.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi @KrytenKoro:. I actually did warn the user for that particular edit of vandalism here. In any case, it's good to hear from you. It's certainly been a while. Cheers, Artichoker 02:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Huh. Okay. I was confused by that, since he'd been a user since 2006, but okay. Thanks!Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: MissingNo.

I ended up reverting it, but only because the information he added is actually in the article, in the section directly above it. I'm wary about going into further detail regarding the glitch simply because that was one of the harder bits to 'lock down' during the FA, as it was up in the air just how much information someone would need to know on how to trigger the glitch for a reader completely unfamiliar with the game or even gaming itself.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2015, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2015, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2015, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Awards

Hey, so, I edited the wiki and of course I provided a link since you told me to do so and there are those idiots undoing my edit with no explanation/reason. Could you tell them to stop already? Here's the link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-07-09/yumiko-kawahara-madoka-magica-win-sense-of-gender-awards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.38.21.38 (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Geoff Iddison listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geoff Iddison. Since you had some involvement with the Geoff Iddison redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2017, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2017, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Madoka FAC

Hello. I've now nominated Puella Magi Madoka Magica for FA status, would it be okay with you to be a co-nominator of the nomination? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 02:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Naruto, see my reply on the nomination page. I don't think nominating for FAC is appropriate at this time. What do you believe has significantly changed about the article since the last time we discussed this and how have those original concerns been addressed? Artichoker 03:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2022, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Artichoker: Difference between revisions Add topic