| Revision as of 14:13, 26 September 2009 editPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits →File source problem with File:3 The Cause of World Unrest (New York - 1920).jpg← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:03, 18 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,348 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Ludvikus/Archive 16) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{mbox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |style = width:52%; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; | |||
| |text = <div> | |||
| '''This {{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|ip | |||
| |] | |||
| |user | |||
| }} has been [[Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy|blocked {{#if:| | |||
| |indefinitely | |||
| }}]] from editing Misplaced Pages{{#if: | |||
| | for a period of {{{time}}} | |||
| }}{{#if: | |||
| | by {{{by}}} | |||
| }}.'''{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|User talk | |||
| |{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|historical | |||
| |<br /> For the previous version of page, please see <span class="plainlinks"></span>. | |||
| }} | |||
| }}<br /><small>(see: {{·}} ]{{·}} {{#if:|{{·}} {{{link}}}}}{{#if:|{{·}} {{{link2}}}}}{{#if:|{{·}} {{{link3}}}}})</small> | |||
| }}{{#switch: | |||
| |ip={{#if:| | |||
| |] | |||
| }} | |||
| |historical= | |||
| }}__NOINDEX__<!-- Template:Blocked_user --> | |||
| {{archive box | search=yes |auto=long }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 16 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(90d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Ludvikus/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Ludvikus/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| {{usertalkheader}} | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| {{User:Cobaltbluetony/busy}} | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| <div style="float:right; width:24em;"> | |||
| <!-- Template:Archive box --> | |||
| {|style="float: right; border:1px #333 solid; background-color: #FFC;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="padding-top:4px; text-align:center;" colspan="2"| ]<br />'''Archives''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="text-align:right;"| from || ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | to || ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] to || ] ] | |||
| |} | |||
| <br clear="all" /> | |||
| {{Signpost-subscription}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Proposed deletion of World domination == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>This article is strictly original research. No evidence is given that any of the real historical information is related to the topic of "world domination." No references are given for fictional "world domination", or that it has even been discussed in secondary sources.</b> | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 02:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: The expression "]" is actually used by crackpots in their ]. Unless, the article is edited substantially to reflect this usage, I support the deletion of the article. --] (]) 18:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I've also noticed the qualified usage "(])" here: "]." --] (])! | |||
| == File source problem with File:3 The Cause of World Unrest (New York - 1920).jpg == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 06:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 06:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : "The ]" is an extremely important ] text. What ]'s "]" was in the United States in relation to the "]," this text was in Britain. --] (]) 18:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Unblock request == | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|(1) I have learned how to avoid being blocked in the future.(2) I understand now 100% how to avoid it - simply drop ANY confrontation with any other editor. (3) I've been blocked for over a year already, I believe (but I haven't counted it - I've lost the count. (3) I'm being requested to contributed my observations regarding proposed editing of article - but I'm unable to respond because of my being blocked. (4) I have absolutely no interests in any confrontations at Misplaced Pages which would lead to a "block" - so there's really no need to block me any longer.}} --] (]) 19:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
| {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>Blocked for well over a year, positively worded unblock request, so I'll give you another chance. If you get into difficulties, I suggest you pursue ]. | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ] (]) 08:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <small> '''Unblocking administrator''': Please check for <span class="plainlinks"> on this user after accepting the unblock request.</small> | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 13:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:Howard Zinn|, such as the one you made to ],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> --] | ] 17:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :Unfortunately, nowadays the use of the term "revisionist" without any qualifier leads people to assume that the subject is a ], which is not what you meant. The fact that Zinn is a ] probably should not go into the lede, to avoid this kind of misunderstanding. --] | ] 17:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| ::I think otherwise. The "confusion" is due to Misplaced Pages having failed to do it's job of making the distinction, doing disambiguation, etc. In part, I think, that's why my article is so important: ]. Because the job is not easy, does not justify Wikipedians like yourself simply giving up. --] (]) 23:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| I've been watching ] for a couple of days, waiting to see if I was going to leap in or not and am pretty satisfied, even happy about your resolution of the issue of revisionism. As far as wikipedia failing to do it's job, well it is folks like us who actually do that job and your article on American historical revisionism (yours right?) was an interesting and for me unexpected direction to go in. Life is supposed to be interesting. ] (]) 18:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your positive feed-back. Unfortunately, it's not easy to work in this community we know as Misplaced Pages. And only lately I seem to have learned how to improve my effectiveness. I think that the so-called ] have been so successful at promoting themselves as ], that even Misplaced Pages was troubled by calling a noted living historian, like ], a ]. Now you may think what I've done is OK, but I'm not sure the editor who objects to the confusion will yet agree that it's safe to call Zinn a "revisionist" (in the good sense of the word. --] (]) 18:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the info. I just emailed a historian, James Mullin, who seems to be using the term much in the way you are, and I am trying to learn to, to get an opinion. I either hear back from these folks or I don't. It's about 50/50. To many of us the word "revisionist' is a sort of dirty term with all sorts of implications but even the wikipedia article ] has little or no negative connotations. Life a wikipedia is a strange place. I have not mentioned this here (wikipedia) , but I was just interviewed by a world roving ] crew doing a piece on "community" or something and we got into some of the frustrations involved. Probably will end up on the cutting room floor, but it was-interesting to try and put some of my feels into words. Of course my best answers occurred to me 3 hours after they'd gone. Oh well. ] (]) 23:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well I do agree that ] looks like someone's college term paper rather than a standard wikipedia article. However I am not sure that I am going to tackle it because I don't have the resources to do so. Since I work Fri, Sat, Sun I certainly will not do so in the next few days. And although I have a degree in history somewhere this sort of arguement is not one that really interests me all that much. It looks like trench warfare to me. We'll see. ] (]) 15:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's not as bad as you think - if we read this informative reference: . --] (]) 16:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==RfD nomination of ]== | |||
| I have nominated {{la|Global empire}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] | ] 02:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes. It should be '''deleted.''' It's now only a REDIRECT because I've Moved/Renamed is contents so: ]. --] (]) 12:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Repost of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on {{#if:Jeff Riggenbach|]|a page you created}} requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a ] following a ]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{tl|hangon}} '''underneath''' the other template on the article and put a note on the page's ] saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use ] instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.<!-- Template: Uw-repost --> ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 16:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi there. You and me can't actually see the content that the page used to have (before it was deleted), but admins can, if you want to ask an admin I would suggest trying one of the ones on ], pick someone fairly active, I'd suggest ], ], ], ], ], ], ], or ], to name a few :). The reason I marked the page for deletion is because the old version of the page (the one which got deleted), had a discussion about it, and the result of that discussion was to delete the article. The discussion can be viewed at ]. Naturally this doesn't mean that the article can never be recreated, it just means that simply creating the page is the wrong way to go around getting it back. To try a restore the article, please follow the steps at ]. Best - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 16:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
.jpg){kind=link}
Latest revision as of 18:03, 18 September 2024
 |
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Nomination of Misplaced Pages – The Missing Manual for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Misplaced Pages – The Missing Manual is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia – The Missing Manual until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ominateu (talk) 13:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.