| Revision as of 00:45, 2 October 2009 editChildofMidnight (talk | contribs)43,041 edits →Will Connolley's continued trouble making: question← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:09, 4 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,694 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive 20) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 20 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{/Front matter}} | |||
| <inputbox> | |||
| bgcolor= | |||
| type=fulltext | |||
| prefix=Wikipedia_talk:Requests for arbitration | |||
| break=yes | |||
| width=60 | |||
| searchbuttonlabel=Search archives | |||
| </inputbox> | |||
| ⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Talk header}} | ||
| == MOS review per ]? == | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| One of the enforcement provisions of ] was that after three months passed from the case's closure, the Committee would review the ] for stability (]). Is this still going to happen? Apologies if this is the incorrect venue. ] (]) 01:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :try WT:AC/N--] (]) 21:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, have done so (). ] (]) 04:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Egad == | ||
| Is there a clerk around ] (]) 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{resolved}} | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| The project page header overprints itself in Safari. In Firefox at least it doesn't overprint, but it still looks weird. I've debugged the problem but the page is protected. Please replace the <nowiki>{{ArbCom notice banner}}</nowiki> in ] with the following: | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3#Misplaced Pages:ACCR}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]<sub>]<sub>]</sub></sub> (]/]) 16:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| <pre> | |||
| {| style="text-align: left; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid silver; padding: 1em; margin:auto; font-size: 10pt;" | |||
| | Please make your request in the appropriate section: | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| *: <small>This includes requests to lift sanctions previously imposed</small> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| *: <small>Arbitrator-initiated motions, not specific to a case</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| </pre> | |||
| The new box displays as: | |||
| {| style="text-align: left; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid silver; padding: 1em; margin:auto; font-size: 10pt;" | |||
| | Please make your request in the appropriate section: | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| *: <small>This includes requests to lift sanctions previously imposed</small> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| *: <small>Arbitrator-initiated motions, not specific to a case</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| The result is much more clear, the box repositions nicely as the browser window width is adjusted, and it looks the same in both Safari and Firefox. I could also do without the ArbComOpenTasks to the right of the TOC (above would be nicer), but a little scrolling won't kill me when I'm not in full screen mode. ] (]) 05:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I have done this, although it still looks a little inconsistent between Opera and IE (the only browsers I have handy here). Please direct any further requests of this nature to ], as it's more heavily monitored and one of the clerks is likely to see it much sooner! ] <sup>(])</sup> 12:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC). | |||
| :Actually it doesn't display as above in Firefox, the text in the box is centred and the squares (they must have a proper name, they are created by the asterisks I presume), look very odd. Chrome looks pretty bad. It looks to me as though there is room for the 'Please make your request' stuff below the text with the info boxes to the right of those links, which would tidy up the page, but I'm not very good at markup. ] (]) 13:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have completed the fixes. The page should look good on all browsers. The root problem with the open case box being cut off on the right side of the screen was that the TOC now has entries such as "Request for clarification: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Obama_articles#ChildofMidnight_and_Wikidemon_restricted". The underscores don't allow the TOC entry to break to a new line, which forces the TOC to get so wide that it displaces anything to the right of it. Seeing that we have other wide TOC entries as well, and since the open case box is now pretty wide on its own, I decided it was better to make it look good for everybody and just put the TOC under the open cases. ] (]) 13:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * Thank you for drawing up the code fix, Douggie. A/R is, at the best of times, horrific in terms of the quality of its code—as all such unwieldy pages are prone to be—so any improvements are appreciated. And yes, as Lankiveil notes, requests of this nature will be most quickly noticed if placed in the appropriate section of the ]. ] 19:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == The undertow / Law / CoM == | |||
| This keeps coming up: that Law's otherwise inexplicable unblock of CoM is explicable once you know about interactions between The undertow and CoM. But for those of us not familiar with the prehistory, someone please say what those interactions were. ] (]) 21:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Will Connolley's continued trouble making== | |||
| {{collapsetop|Issues should be addressed at ], ], or ], not here. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| Probably needs to be addressed. Is he not banned yet? ] (]) 22:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : ]. But since you're here, please clearly state your connection with The undertow, or deny that any such connection exists ] (]) 22:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::What's it to you? ] (]) 22:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for restoring this thread Connolley. I'm sure Tznakai meant well, but this is clearly an important issue that Arbcom should be addressing, as opposed to the silliness above. Would you like to comment on the activities of your cabal with Dabelstein and Schulz? ] (]) 22:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: ]. The propriety of Law / The undertows unblock of you is relevant to the RFAr. It would be helpful if you could clarify the situation rather than evading it ] (]) 22:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{collapsebottom}} | |||
| ::::Why does this section keep getting removed or collapsed? ] (]) 00:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 4 January 2025
| Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes contains the official policy on dispute resolution for English Misplaced Pages. Arbitration is generally the last step for user conduct-related disputes that cannot be resolved through discussion on noticeboards or by asking the community its opinion on the matter.
This page is the central location for discussing the various requests for arbitration processes. Requesting that a case be taken up here isn't likely to help you, but editors active in the dispute resolution community should be able to assist. Please click here to file an arbitration case • Please click here for a guide to arbitration | Shortcuts |
| Arbitration talk page archives |
|---|
| WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009) |
| Various archives (2004–2011) |
| Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–) |
| WT:RFAR subpages |
| Archive of prior proceedings |
Egad
Is there a clerk around -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:ACCR" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:ACCR has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § Misplaced Pages:ACCR until a consensus is reached. JJPMaster (she/they) 16:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)