| Revision as of 16:01, 9 October 2009 editGaryColemanFan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,473 edits →Chris Benoit: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:18, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,256 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 --> | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] <font color="green">]</font> 00:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == CFB championships == | |||
| Hi Craig, | |||
| You may want to familiarize yourself with the archives of ] (and perhaps join ], too), especially ] regarding the reversions you've been making regarding the number of team titles. It's not a set issue as to what number(s) is/are appropriate to list. It may be worth re-opening the discussion. — ]'']'' 21:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Natural-born citizens== | |||
| The material which you correctly removed from the Article Two discussion was not only uncited, it was completely without a basis in fact. I put the fact tags on it in the first place, because I was willing to wait for someone to offer evidence of the existence of this "dispute" even if the dispute was without merit. The reason it sat uncited for two months is that there ''is'' no "dispute" among reliable scholars of the Constitution about the natural-born citizenship of persons born in US territories (everyone agrees that they qualify). Thanks for your work on the page. ] (]) 01:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Chris Benoit == | |||
| Actually, the fact that he killed them IS in question. The murders were not proven and they can't be, since everyone believed to be involved is dead. "Authorities concluded" =/= fact. I'm not doubting that he killed them. There's only a fool's chance that he didn't. But it's not a fact, so the article should not be presented as such. ] (]) 17:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You may be right. News sources are not exactly my forte and generally don't work on controversial issues such as this. That being said, others have expressed the same concerns as myself, so I've asked for some input on the ]. That being said, I've been on Wikipeida for over two years, so I do for the most part understand it's inner workings. In addition, there is nothing wrong with me contacting you on your talk page rather than article talk page, since the message was directed to you and not just a general message. ] (]) 18:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Craig, first you need to stop claiming that people are vandalizing the page by changing what you think should be the wording. Second, saying "Benoit is believed to have" does NOT violate NPOV (despite your claims that it does). In fact, it's more neutral than the wording you want to have in the article. Benoit will never be convicted or murder since he killed himself, that means authorities can determine he did it and thus believe he did it. That means it's more accurate to say he is believed to have done it. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 18:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::TJ and I are separate users. You responded to him on my talk page. ] (]) 19:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Considering you've responded so far, it seems obvious to me that you check your talk page when Misplaced Pages notifies you about a new message. ] (]) 19:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Chris Benoit|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 23 November 2015
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)