Misplaced Pages

Quilliam (think tank): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:19, 11 October 2009 editJk54 (talk | contribs)301 edits Removed arbitrary vandalism by Avaya/Quilliam Employee- as per dispute page, if any material is disputed please highlight so it can be discussed before removal← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:11, 21 December 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,427,328 edits Altered template type. Added work. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Spinixster | Category:Think tanks based in the United Kingdom | #UCB_Category 52/72 
(874 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British counter-extremism think-tank}}
{{Article issues|disputed=March 2009|npov=March 2009|rewrite=March 2009}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2021}}
'''Quilliam describes itself as "the world’s first counter-extremism think tank." It is based in London and set up by Maajid Nawaz, Mahboob 'Ed' Hussain and Rashaad Zaman Ali, all former members of the UK branch of the international Islamist group ].
{{Infobox organization
| name = Quilliam
| logo = Logo of Quilliam think tank.jpg
| dissolved = 2021
| type =
| founded_date = {{start date|2008}}
| founder = ]<br />]<br />Rashad Zaman Ali
| location = ], England, UK
| origins =
| key_people = Maajid Nawaz<br />Rashad Zaman Ali<br />Haras Rafiq<br />David Toube
| area_served =
| product =
| focus =
| method =
| revenue =
| endowment =
| num_volunteers =
| num_employees = 10
| num_members =
| subsid =
| owner =
| homepage = |
| footnotes =
}}


'''Quilliam''' was a British ] co-founded in 2008 by ] that focused on counter-], specifically against ], which it argued represents a desire to impose a given interpretation of ] on society. Founded as '''The Quilliam Foundation''' and based in ], it claimed to lobby government and public institutions for more nuanced policies regarding Islam and on the need for greater democracy in the ] whilst empowering "]" voices. The organisation opposed any Islamist ideology and championed freedom of expression. The critique of Islamist ideology by its founders―Nawaz, Rashad Zaman Ali and ]―was based, in part, on their personal experiences. Quilliam went into liquidation in 2021.
The foundation takes its name from the Islamic activist ], an English convert to Islam during the 1880s.


==History==
==Objectives and ideology==
===2007: Foundation and terminology===
Quilliam is a counter-extremism think tank. It supports the revival of an Islam of ] heritage. Maajid Nawaz, one of its founders states, <blockquote>The first (objective) is I want to demonstrate how the Islamist ideology is incompatible with Islam. Secondly, I want to develop a Western Islam that is at home in Britain and in Europe. We want to reverse radicalization by taking on their arguments and countering them.<ref>“How I’ll fight against Islamic extremism”, http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local/display.var.2220706.0.how_ill_fight_against_islamic_extremism.php</ref></blockquote>
]]]


Quilliam was established in 2007 by ], ] and ], three former members of the Islamist group ].<ref>{{cite news | url=https://en.qantara.de/content/quilliam-foundation-a-muslim-think-tank-to-counter-extremism | title=Quilliam Foundation: A Muslim Think Tank to Counter Extremism - Qantara.de | work=Qantara.de - Dialogue with the Islamic World }}</ref> Husain left in 2011 to join the ] in New York.<ref name=nawaz352-3>Nawaz (2012): pp. 352–353</ref> ], who founded the ] (which later morphed into the ]), claimed: "Around the time Ed Husain came to public notice, I recruited him to work with me (through ], the organisation that originally hosted the CSC). He liked my views and I had great hopes for him to become a source for real reform. This gave him the time and financial freedom to set up ."<ref name="nafeez"/>
Quilliam argues that Islam is not an ideology but a religion,<ref>Husain states, “Islamists are at odds with Islam as a faith. Islam is a faith not an ideology” – “How I’ll fight against Islamic extremism”, .php</ref> namely “Islam is not Islamism.”<ref name=autogenerated10 />


The organisation was named after ],<ref>Nawaz (2012): p. 327</ref> a 19th-century British convert to Islam who founded Britain's first mosque. The organisation was originally called '''The Quilliam Foundation''', but later rebranded as simply '''Quilliam'''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.quilliamfoundation.org|title=Quilliam|publisher=Quilliam|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501080648/http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/|archive-date=1 May 2008|url-status=live}}</ref>
The organisation opposes ], in particular the group ]. Its critique is based on the experiences of Quilliam founders Maajid Nawaz, Rashaad Zaman Ali and Ed husain who were all members of Hizb ut-Tahrir. Ali was the 'mujtahid' of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain. Quilliam also employs several other ex-activists of Hizb ut-Tahrir. There has been little academic research on Hizb ut-Tahrir apart from that undertaken by Dr Farouki as part of her PHD at Durham University.<ref name=autogenerated11 />


Quilliam defined ] in the following terms:
Quilliam argues that Islam has no specific prescriptions for modes of governance, as Muslim history has illustrated a plethora of approaches to government. Unlike Christianity, it argues, Islam has not battled for the separation of church and state, clerics were almost always an entity separate from government. Quilliam argues that Muslim scholars such as ] (d 1350) condemned those who claimed to rule in God's name - <ref>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/ed-husain-you-ask-the-questions-808652.html “Muslims have never had a church that defined all aspects of faith and politics. Muslim scholars have always existed outside of the political sphere and developed diverse traditions, religious and ethical codes outside of political authority.”</ref>
{{Quote|It is the belief that Islam is a political ideology, as well as a faith. It is a modernist claim that political sovereignty belongs to God, that the Shari'ah should be used as state law, that Muslims form a political rather than a religious bloc around the world and that it is a religious duty for all Muslims to create a political entity that is governed as such. Islamism is a spectrum, with Islamists disagreeing over how they should bring their 'Islamic' state into existence.


Some Islamists seek to engage with existing political systems, others reject the existing systems as illegitimate but do so non-violently, and others seek to create an 'Islamic state' through violence. Most Islamists are socially modern but others advocate a more retrograde lifestyle. Islamists often have contempt for Muslim scholars and sages and their traditional institutions; as well as a disdain for non-Islamist Muslims and the West.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/about/faqs/|title= Frequently Asked Questions – What is Islamism?|publisher= Quilliam|access-date= 24 October 2013|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131018142153/http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/about/faqs/|archive-date= 2013-10-18|url-status= dead}}</ref>}}
==Proposals==
A policy proposal has been published for the British government and journalists. There has been no response from the government. The Foundation claims it has relied on organisations including ], ], ], ] and ] for its content,<ref></ref> however, it does not reference any of its proposals to these organisations.


Quilliam argued that Islam is a faith, not an ideology,<ref>Maajid Nawaz states "Islamists are at odds with Islam as a faith. Islam is a faith not an ideology" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111017182755/http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/2220706.how_ill_fight_against_islamic_extremism/ |date=17 October 2011 }}</ref> and that "Islam is not Islamism".<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-husain-you-ask-the-questions-808652.html|title= Ed Husain: You Ask The Questions|publisher= Independent|date= 14 April 2008|location= London|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180113150318/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ed-husain-you-ask-the-questions-808652.html|archive-date= 13 January 2018|url-status= live}}</ref> It also argues that " are extreme because of their rigidity in understanding politics".<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/publications/free/pulling-together-to-defeat-terror.pdf |title= Pulling together to defeat terror" p. 3 |publisher= Quilliam |access-date= 24 October 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140514061238/http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/publications/free/pulling-together-to-defeat-terror.pdf |archive-date= 14 May 2014 |url-status= dead }}</ref>
The primary recommendation is the establishment of rehabilitation centres<ref> </ref> in which to “detox” extremists, based on the success of Egyptian and Saudi programmes of this kind. These centres would expose extremists and terrorists who wish to leave their organisations to the work of scholars whose work has been recognized as sound and legitimate.<ref></ref>


The organization's goals were mainly communicated in three ways: through the publication of reports, through involvement with the media, i.e. by taking part in interviews and discussions across Europe and the Middle East, and through its "Outreach and Training" unit, which delivers a "radicalisation awareness programme".
Other goals include instructing and urging communities, groups, scholars and leaders to identify and eject Islamists/extremists from their midst.


===2008: Gaza War===
The organization's ultimate audience is British Muslims, with a particular focus on extremists and radicals. To date the organization's goals have been mainly communicated to non-Muslim audiences through presentations, interviews and discussions across Europe and the Middle East.
On 30 December 2008, just days after the outbreak of the ], Husain condemned the "ruthless air strikes and economic blockade" of Gaza city by Israel.<ref name=guardianGaza>{{cite news|last=Husain|first=Ed|title=Britain has a duty to Arabs|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/30/israelandthepalestinians-middleeast|newspaper=The Guardian|date=30 December 2008|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105192414/http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/30/israelandthepalestinians-middleeast|archive-date=5 November 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=vice>{{cite news|last=Engelhart|first=Katie|title=Revealing Quilliam, the Muslim Destroyers of the English Far-Right|url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/jm9eqy/quilliam|newspaper=Vice|date=10 October 2013|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017165128/http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/quilliam|archive-date=17 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> He predicted that the result would be "rightful support for the beleaguered Palestinian peoples – and a boost to the popularity of ] by default".<ref name=guardianGaza/>


===2010: "Prevent" strategy===
==Founders==
On 14 June 2010, a strategic briefing paper with a covering letter signed by Nawaz and Hussain was sent to ], director of the ] (OSCT). The briefing paper was intended to be a confidential review of the UK government's ] following the ], and was "particularly critical of the view that government partnerships with non-violent yet otherwise extreme Islamists were the best way to fend off ]".<ref name=Nawaz348>Nawaz (2012): p. 348</ref> Although sent "by hard copy alone" with no electronic version,<ref name=Nawaz348/> both letter and briefing paper were leaked by being scanned and published on the internet,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/57458694/Preventing-Terrorism-Where-Next-for-Britain-Quilliam-Foundation |title=Quilliam: Preventing Terrorism: where next for Britain? |access-date=10 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117202203/https://www.scribd.com/doc/57458694/Preventing-Terrorism-Where-Next-for-Britain-Quilliam-Foundation |archive-date=17 November 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> provoking protests from various groups which had been identified in the Quilliam briefing as sympathetic or supportive of Islamist extremism.<ref name=guardian1>{{cite news|title=List sent to terror chief aligns peaceful Muslim groups with terrorist ideology|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/aug/04/quilliam-foundation-list-alleged-extremism|last=Dodd|first=Vikram|newspaper=The Guardian|date=4 August 2010|access-date=2 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020180650/http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/aug/04/quilliam-foundation-list-alleged-extremism|archive-date=20 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the briefing document, "The ideology of non-violent Islamists is broadly the same as that of violent Islamists; they disagree only on tactics."<ref name=guardian1/><ref name=telegraph1>{{cite news|title=Mainstream Islamic organisations 'share al-Qaeda ideology'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7928377/Mainstream-Islamic-organisations-share-al-Qaeda-ideology.html|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|last=Gardham|first=Duncan|date=5 August 2010|access-date=2 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111234409/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7928377/Mainstream-Islamic-organisations-share-al-Qaeda-ideology.html|archive-date=11 November 2013|url-status=live}}</ref>
The three public founders are ], ], and ], who were ex-members of the UK branch of the Islamic political party ]. Maajid Nawaz was on their national executive leadership committee. Throughout ]’s history, no members had previously undertaken such a high profile 180-degree reversal of position<ref name=autogenerated11>Taji-Farouki, S, "A Fundamental Quest: Hizb al-Tahrir and the Search for the Islamic Caliphate", Grey Seal, London, 1996</ref><ref name=autogenerated2></ref>.


Quilliam's report claimed that a unit within ] called the Muslim Contact Unit,<ref name=guardian1/> and a separate independent group called the ],<ref name=guardian1/> intended to improve the relationship between the police and the Muslim community, were respectively "Islamist-dominated"<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117202203/https://www.scribd.com/doc/57458694/Preventing-Terrorism-Where-Next-for-Britain-Quilliam-Foundation |date=17 November 2015 }}: p. 4</ref> and "associated with Jamaat e-Islami".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117202203/https://www.scribd.com/doc/57458694/Preventing-Terrorism-Where-Next-for-Britain-Quilliam-Foundation |date=17 November 2015 }}: p. 60</ref> Other organisations listed by the Quilliam report included the ]<ref name=guardian1/> and its rival the ],<ref name=telegraph1/> both said to be "associated with the ]".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117202203/https://www.scribd.com/doc/57458694/Preventing-Terrorism-Where-Next-for-Britain-Quilliam-Foundation |date=17 November 2015 }}: p. 59</ref> Also said to have Islamist sympathies or to be associated with Islamist groups were the ],<ref name=guardian1/><ref name=telegraph1/> the ],<ref name=telegraph1/> the ],<ref name=telegraph1/> and the ].<ref name=guardian1/>
===Mohammed “Ed” Mahboob Husain===
Husain chronicled his experience with Hizb ut-Tahrir in his book “]”. ], ], ], ] and some Sufi Muslim leaders were among the positive reviewers whilst leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain, ], ], ] and ] were more critical with ] questioning whether the book was penned by someone in the Government of the United Kingdom.<ref></ref>:
<blockquote>The fixation with HT is somewhat understandable considering the history of Husein. However, the obsession to blame it for the environment of terrorism is taking reductionism to its extreme. (Ziauddin Sardar)<ref></ref></blockquote>


The report said of these organisations: "These are a selection of the various groups and institutions active in the UK which are broadly sympathetic to Islamism. Whilst only a small proportion will agree with al-Qaida's tactics, many will agree with their overall goal of creating a single 'Islamic state' which would bring together all Muslims around the world ] and then impose on them a single interpretation of ] as state law."<ref name=guardian1/><ref name=telegraph1/> Politicians described by the report as "Islamist-backed" included ], then leader of the ], and ], also from Respect.<ref name=telegraph1/> ], chairman of Muslims4Uk and a former spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, and Fatima Khan, vice-chair of the Muslim Safety Forum, both described Quilliam's list as "]".<ref name=guardian1/><ref name=telegraph1/> Bunglawala added: "In effect, Quilliam – a body funded very generously by the government through Prevent – are attempting to set themselves up as arbiters of who is and is not an acceptable Muslim."<ref name=telegraph1/>
Husain argued that he was a member of ] and left due to his contribution to the atmosphere surrounding the murder of a student at ].<ref> </ref> Hizb ut-Tahrir categorically denied he had ever been a member<ref></ref> and the trial Judge’s report concluded the Newham College murder had in fact resulted from an argument over a table tennis game.<ref></ref>


A ] spokesman told the press that the report had not been solicited, but added: "We believe the Prevent programme isn't working as effectively as it could and want a strategy that is effective and properly focused – that is why we are reviewing it."<ref name=guardian1/><ref name=telegraph1/>
Regarding extremist Muslims he says, <blockquote>Call them jihadists, Islamists, but I wouldn't call them Muslim. Being Muslim is not enough for them. They make politics seem religious….<ref></ref></blockquote> He informed the university authorities of the presence of members of the extremist group ] in Damascus and has called for them to be banned in the UK.<ref>Husain says, “… banning Hizb ut-Tahrir would be an excellent first step” - , retrieved 20th May 2008</ref>


Nawaz told '']'': "Quilliam has a track record of distinguishing between legal tolerance and civil tolerance – we oppose banning non-] ... yet we see no reason why tax payers should subsidise them. It is in this context that we wish to raise {{sic|awareness |hide=y|around}} Islamism."<ref name=telegraph1/>
Husain has described racism in the Arab world,<ref name=autogenerated15></ref><ref></ref><ref name=autogenerated15 /> cites ] as his hero,<ref name=autogenerated10></ref><ref></ref><ref name=autogenerated15 /> criticises the director of ] for "pussyfooting around" with extremists,<ref name=autogenerated8> Critique of the Quilliam Foundation</ref><ref name=autogenerated15 /> he defends the government's decision to ban ] ] from Britain because Qaradawi defends Islamic suicide attacks on civilians<ref></ref><ref name=autogenerated8 /> and Husian attacks multiculturalism, declaring there to be too many immigrants in the country.<ref></ref>


===2013: English Defence League controversy===
===Maajid Nawaz===
On 8 October 2013, it was announced that the co-founders of the ] (EDL), ] and Kevin Carroll, had had meetings with Quilliam and intended to leave the EDL. Robinson said that street protests were "no longer effective" and "acknowledged the dangers of ]". However, he also said that he intended to continue to combat radical Islamism by forming a new party. Both Robinson and Carroll began taking lessons in Islam from Quilliam member ], and stated their intention to train in lobbying institutions.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-turns-his-back-on-his-own-party-over-dangers-of-farright-extremism-8866177.html | title=EDL leader Tommy Robinson turns his back on his own party over 'dangers of far-right extremism' | work=The Independent | date=8 October 2013 | access-date=8 October 2013 | author=Milmo, Cahal | location=London | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131009191138/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-turns-his-back-on-his-own-party-over-dangers-of-farright-extremism-8866177.html | archive-date=9 October 2013 | url-status=live }}</ref> However, in December 2015 Robinson, who founded the anti-Islamic organisation ] after leading the EDL, claimed that Quilliam had paid him a total of around £8000 over a period of six months so they could take credit for his exit from the EDL, although he said that he had already decided to leave the movement before coming into contact with Quilliam. Quilliam subsequently acknowledged that they had paid Robinson, although they characterised the payments as remuneration "for costs associated with outreach that he & Dr Usama Hassan did to Muslim communities after Tommy's departure from the EDL".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/12/03/tommy-robinson-claims-quilliam-paid-him-to-leave-edl_n_8710834.html |title=Tommy Robinson, Former EDL Leader, Claims Quilliam Paid Him To Quit Far-Right Group |last1=Hopkins |first1=Steven |date=10 December 2015 |website=] |access-date=28 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161016004510/http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/12/03/tommy-robinson-claims-quilliam-paid-him-to-leave-edl_n_8710834.html |archive-date=16 October 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref>
] was a senior member of Hizb ut-Tahrir for 12 years and he was on their national executive leadership committee. He was jailed in Egypt in 2002 with two others for belonging to ]. Whilst in prison, he began to review and reconsider some of his Islamist ideas<ref></ref> and developing his understanding of traditional Islam. On his release, he appeared on ]’s ] claiming Hizb ut-Tahrir’s ideas were peaceful and had prevented him from becoming violent despite the oppression he had faced, arguing his time in prison had “convinced me even more... that there is a need to establish this ] as soon as possible”.


Quilliam had previously persuaded another member of the EDL, Nick Jode, to leave the EDL. Jode had been persuaded by the writings and on-line videos of ] speaking on behalf of Quilliam, being particularly impressed by Nawaz's debate with ] of the Islamist group ].<ref name=vice/>
In 2007 Nawaz resigned from Hizb ut-tahrir. He claimed he had been with Hizb ut-Tahrir for 12 years,<ref> and http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/09/why_newsnights_interview_with_former_ht_member_is.html</ref> and, nearly two years later, in 2008 this became, <blockquote>“I have been training people for 14 years, every single week for two hours a week…“<ref>http://quilliamfoundation.org/component/content/article/51-video/173 and http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1063960.ece</ref></blockquote>


===2016: Dispute with Southern Poverty Law Center===
Nawaz attributes his departure from Hizb ut-Tahrir to the party's violent and separatist agenda and his profound doubts about what the group represents.
{{See also|Maajid Nawaz#SPLC claim}}


In October 2016, the U.S. ] accused Nawaz of being an "anti-Muslim extremist". In June 2018, the SPLC apologised and paid $3.375 million to Nawaz and Quilliam "to fund their work to fight anti-Muslim bigotry and extremism".<ref>{{cite news |title=Statement regarding Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam Foundation |url=https://www.splcenter.org/news/2018/06/18/splc-statement-regarding-maajid-nawaz-and-quilliam-foundation |website=SPLCenter.org |publisher=SPLC |access-date=18 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180618150811/https://www.splcenter.org/news/2018/06/18/splc-statement-regarding-maajid-nawaz-and-quilliam-foundation |archive-date=18 June 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/southern-poverty-law-center-must-3-3-million-payout-after-falsely-naming-anti-muslim-extremists/|title=Southern Poverty Law Center Must Pay $3.3 Million After Falsely Naming Anti-Muslim Extremists|work=Law & Crime|author=Matt Naham|date=18 June 2018|access-date=19 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180619163901/https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/southern-poverty-law-center-must-3-3-million-payout-after-falsely-naming-anti-muslim-extremists/|archive-date=19 June 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Rashad Zaman Ali===
] is of Bangladeshi and originally from Sheffield;<ref name=autogenerated5></ref> he encountered ] when a party member delivered a school assembly.<ref name=autogenerated5 /> Following this he read a tract of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s economic system which deconstructed western economic theory of ], ] and ] through to ].<ref name=autogenerated2 /> He began studying with Hizb ut-Tahrir, became a senior member and mujtahid of the party. He was with them for 12 years.<ref name=autogenerated5 /><ref name=autogenerated4></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref>


==The Quilliam name== ===2021: Dissolution===
The Quilliam Foundation Ltd was put into liquidation on 9 April 2021.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06432342/insolvency |title=THE QUILLIAM FOUNDATION LTD |website=Companies House |access-date=2 May 2021}}</ref> The same day, Nawaz posted on ]: "Due to the hardship of maintaining a non-profit during ] lockdowns, we took the tough decision to close Quilliam down for good. This was finalised today. A huge thank you to all those who supported us over the years. We are now looking forward to a new post-covid future".<ref name="MacDonald">{{cite news|url=https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uk-quilliam-foundation-controversial-counter-extremist-closes|title=Quilliam: British 'counter-extremist' group closes citing lack of funds|last=MacDonald|first=Alex|date=9 April 2021|work=]|access-date=9 April 2021}}</ref>
], a 19th century British convert to Islam, was influential in advancing knowledge of Islam within the British Isles, and gained converts through literary works and charitable institutions he founded.


==Support== ==Funding==
When Quilliam launched in 2007, the ] provided it with £674,608 of funding.<ref name="nafeez">{{cite news|url=https://bylinetimes.com/2021/05/11/the-charmed-life-and-strange-sad-death-of-the-quilliam-foundation/|title=The Charmed Life and Strange, Sad Death of the Quilliam Foundation|last=Ahmed|first=Nafeez|date=11 May 2021|work=]|access-date=13 February 2023|language=en-GB}}</ref> In January 2009, '']'' published an article claiming that Quilliam had received almost £1 million from the British government. The article also said that some "members of the Government and the Opposition" had questioned the wisdom of "relying too heavily on a relatively unknown organisation … to counter extremism".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/government-gives-pound1m-to-anti-extremist-think-tank-quilliam-foundation-h2fzrg8lxcc|title=Government gives £1m to anti-extremist think-tank Quilliam Foundation|work=The Times|date=20 January 2009|location=London|first=Richard|last=Kerbaj|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110815120729/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5549138.ece|archive-date= 15 August 2011|url-status= live}}</ref>


From 2011 onwards, Quilliam received no government, i.e. "public", funding.<ref name=bbcRussell/> In the BBC programme '']'', Nawaz explained that "the reason it was cut was because we disagreed at the time with the direction the government was headed. Now that the strategy has changed, and the policy of government has changed, what we ''haven't'' done is revitalize those funding relationships; but rather now we're 100% privately funded, which I'm happy with because of course it allows me to do the work without having to face the questions about which government is funding you and whether we're pursuing a government line or not."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160128070644/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCmGD1R4Ijg |date=28 January 2016 }}: video from 21:14.</ref>
The foundation has received support significantly at the beginning from Tory Member of Parliament ] and from the labour government, Melanie Philips, Ed Husain being a member of ], the home office and ], the ] and ] strategies.{{Fact|date=January 2009}}{{Expand|date=January 2009}}.


With the sudden cut in 2011, Quilliam operated at a loss that year.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/12/tommy-robinson-quilliam-foundation-questions-motivation|title=Tommy Robinson link with Quilliam Foundation raises questions|last=Quinn|first=Ben|work=The Guardian|date=12 October 2013|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131031214845/http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/12/tommy-robinson-quilliam-foundation-questions-motivation|archive-date=31 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref>
==Advisors, associates and affilliates==
The Quilliam site formerly listed a number of scholars as supporters and advisors. All their names were removed, however, after some of them reported that they had been threatened and harassed by Islamists:
<blockquote>“In the meantime, we have decided to respect our advisors' wishes that they continue to advise us in private so as to save them the indignity of constant Islamist-Wahhabite harrassment . We have therefore decided to no longer publicise their names," Hussain said.<ref></ref></blockquote>


According to its political liaison officer, Jonathan Russell, the removal of public funding has been to Quilliam's advantage, as "it can remain ideas-focused, non-partisan and continue its own pursuits."<ref name=bbcRussell>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/24706419|title=Perspectives: The Quilliam Foundation – fighting extremism|first=Jonathan|last=Russell|publisher=BBC Religion & Ethics|date=29 October 2013 |access-date=3 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131031220331/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/24706419|archive-date=31 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref>
He cited a number of scholars whom he approved of in his book, including ], ] and ]; <ref name=autogenerated12>Husain, E, "The Islamist"</ref>


In 2012, the foundation received $75,000 from the Lynde and Harry ], which funds the ].<ref name="Griffin">{{cite web|title=The problem with the Quilliam Foundation|url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/problem-with-quilliam-foundation/|last=Griffin|first=Tom|date=7 November 2016|access-date=5 October 2021|website=]|language=en}}</ref> Quilliam also won a grant of over $1 million from the ].<ref name="Bouattia">{{cite web|last=Bouattia|first=Malia|date=20 April 2021|title=The Quilliam Foundation has closed but its toxic legacy remains|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/4/20/the-quilliam-foundation-has-closed-but-its-toxic-legacy-remains|access-date=23 April 2021|website=Al Jazeera|language=en}}</ref><ref name="georgetown">{{cite web |title=Quilliam {{!}} Factsheet: Islam, Muslims, Islamophobia |author=Bridge Initiative Team |date=19 May 2021 |url=https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-quilliam/ |website=Bridge Initiative |access-date=7 June 2021}}</ref>
==Critics and responses==
The Quilliam Foundation has been criticised by some for its staunch theological position. Critics, many of whom are Islamists or are on the hard left, have included ], ] (]), ] (]), ], ] and ] ('']''). Others like Anas al-Tikriti, ], ], ], and ] have written:
<blockquote>We represent a cross section of the Muslim community, and reject the simplistic narrative about the dangers of Islamism espoused by the Quilliam Foundation… We believe this is just another establishment-backed attempt to divert attention from the main cause of radicalisation and extremism in Britain: the UK's disastrous foreign policy in the Muslim world, including its occupation of Muslim lands and its support for pro-western Muslim dictators. The foundation has no proven grassroots support within the Muslim community, although it does seem to have the ear of the powers that be, probably because it is telling them what they want to hear.
It is quite possible to be a politically engaged Muslim without wanting to fly planes into tall buildings. Yet the foundation equates all forms of political Islam with extremism and terrorism. But those misguided few who are willing to cross the line into terrorism are not driven by disfranchisement or Sayyid Qutb's writings; they do it because they are furious about western foreign policy....<ref>“What turns some Islamists to terror”, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/apr/26/uksecurity</ref></blockquote>


The organisation also received £35,000 from banker and ], ] via his charity, the Sharp Foundation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/richard-sharp-qulliam-new-bbc-chairman-donations-questions|title=Richard Sharp's donations to Quilliam raise questions about his BBC chairmanship|last=Oborne|first=Peter|date=13 January 2021|website=Middle East Eye|accessdate=14 February 2023}}</ref> When asked why he did this, Sharp said he was impressed by Quilliam's "efforts to combat radicalism and extremism".<ref>{{cite news|author=MEE staff|title=BBC chair donated to Quilliam because he was 'impressed' by Maajid Nawaz |url=http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uk-bbc-chair-richard-sharp-donated-qulliam-maajid-nawaz-impressed|date=13 January 2021|access-date=9 April 2021|website=Middle East Eye}}</ref>
On a '']'' discussion with Nawaz, ] of the ] alleged the Quilliam Foundation was comprised of, what he labelled as, "neocons". Others have cited that the founders of Quilliam Foundation are no different to those contained in Dr Sa'id Al-Ghamdi’s doctorate, issued by Medina University, “Deviation from the Faith as Reflected in Thought and Literature on Modernity”, which names more than 200 Arab intellectuals and authors as heretical, controversially making it permissible to kill them.<ref>“Saudi Doctorate Encourages the Murder of Arab Intellectuals”, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP107006</ref> There is also a small number of websites which attempt to satirize the Quilliam Foundation, alleging a lack of originality whilst others have invaded the privacy of the Quilliam Foundation's founders by reproducing private photographs of them.


==Controversies==
Journalists have refrained from criticising the Foundation’s narratives, ties with radical scholars, extreme positions and indiscretions.<ref>“Muslim moderates 'face hate campaign'”, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/20/islam.religion
===Criticism of its tactics===
“Extremists target Jemima with death threats”, http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008\04\24\story_24-4-2008_pg1_8</ref>
Despite Quilliam's claims to oppose extremism of any kind, it had numerous critics. According to Alex MacDonald in '']'', the organisation was "regularly accused of authoritarianism as well as targeting Muslim groups across the UK and tarring them with the "extremist" label with little evidence."<ref name="MacDonald"/> In October 2009, '']'' revealed that Husain was in favour of Muslims being spied upon by the British state even if they were not suspected of committing crimes; Husain is quoted as saying, "It is gathering intelligence on people not committing terrorist offences. If it is to prevent people getting killed and committing terrorism, it is good and it is right."<ref>{{cite news|last=Dodd|first=Vikram|date=16 October 2009|title=Spying morally right, says thinktank|url=http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/oct/16/spying-morally-right-says-thinktank|access-date=9 April 2021|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6353035/Anti-extremism-scheme-spying-on-muslims.html|title=Anti-extremism scheme 'spying on Muslims'|last=Hough|first=Andrew|date=17 October 2009|work=The Daily Telegraph|access-date=9 April 2021|url-access=subscription}}</ref> ] described this attitude as 'appallingly illiberal'.<ref>{{cite web|date=23 October 2009|title=Quilliam's toxic take on liberty |last=Murray |first=Douglas |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/oct/23/quilliam-islamic-fundamentalists-terrorism|access-date=9 April 2021|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref>


], the first female Muslim member of a British Cabinet, described Quilliam in her book ''The Enemy Within'' (2017) as "a bunch of men whose beards are tame, accents crisp, suits sharp, and who have a message the government wants to hear".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/what-sayeeda-warsis-tell-all-tells-us-about-tory-party-1369883076|last=Oborne|first=Peter|author-link=Peter Oborne|date=6 May 2017|website=Middle East Eye|title=Moral of Warsi: Tories can't cope with Muslims|access-date=3 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170613041955/http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/what-sayeeda-warsis-tell-all-tells-us-about-tory-party-1369883076|archive-date=13 June 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
==Controversy==
The Quilliam Foundation's critics have included organizations and personalities such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, ] (]), ] (MCB), ], ] amongst others.
"On blogs and among many Muslims", co-founder Ed Husain "has been condemned as a government stooge, an MI5 agent" and even an apostate from Islam.<ref></ref>,


After Quilliam folded in April 2021, ], former president of the ], stated that "for 13 years Quilliam reinforced the idea that Muslims are a suspect community and supported the draconian “counter-terrorism” policies being pushed by the government." She claimed the foundation "leaves behind a toxic legacy, which will continue to harm the Muslim community in the United Kingdom and beyond."<ref name="Bouattia"/>
===Funding===
The Foundation has come under fire for its spending and funding. It allegedly spends "about £110,000 a year to rent offices at one of Central London’s most prestigious addresses", which, are "expensively furnished with state-of-the-art computers and plasma screen televisions". When it was disclosed the government had given it 1 Million pounds, "members of the Government and the Opposition" questioned the wisdom of "relying too heavily on a relatively unknown organisation ... to counter extremism." <ref></ref>


===Conflating Islamists and Jihadist=== ===Henry Jackson Society===
Quilliam worked with the ],<ref>{{cite news|date=22 May 2017|title=HJS welcomes new Senior Research Fellow at Centre for the Response to Radicalisation and Terrorism|url=https://henryjacksonsociety.org/media-centre/hjs-welcomes-new-senior-research-fellow-at-centre-for-the-response-to-radicalisation-and-terrorism/|access-date=5 October 2021|website=Henry Jackson Society|language=en-GB}}</ref> a ] think tank whose Associate Director, Douglas Murray, supported the ]<ref>{{cite news|title=The Spectator is now plumbing the depths of desperation while trying to defend Israel|url=https://www.thecanary.co/opinion/2021/05/22/the-spectator-is-now-plumbing-the-depths-of-desperation-while-trying-to-defend-israel/|date=22 May 2021|last=Bolton|first=Peter|access-date=5 October 2021|website=]|language=en-GB}}</ref> and has described Islamophobia as "a crock".<ref name="georgetown"/> In 2006, Murray also called for an end to "all immigration into Europe from Muslim countries".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mehdi-hasan/douglas-murray-edl-dodgy-videos-me_b_3675193.html|title=Douglas Murray, the EDL, Dodgy Videos and Me|last=Hasan|first=Mehdi|date=30 July 2013|work=]|accessdate=5 October 2021}}</ref>
] of ]-Watch describes the Quilliam Foundation as "an organisation that has spent its entire existence... claiming that ] ideology not ] is the root cause of "radicalisation", ... a term which of course obliterates the distinction between the general politicisation of Muslim youth in response to imperialism and the influence of terrorist groupuscules"<ref>http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2008/12/31/ed-husain-is-driving-muslims-to-mass-murder-mad-mel-falls-ou.html</ref>


===Grooming gangs===
] in his article 'When exactly did 'radicalisation' become a dirty word?' argues regarding the perceived demonization of Islamists that "the climate of suspicion and spooky mood-music around even non-violent Islamist politics surely reinforces the sense many Muslims have that everyone is out to get them, encouraging further self-absorption."<ref> http://www.culturewars.org.uk/2006-01/dcht.htm </ref>
{{main| Muslim grooming gangs in the United Kingdom}}


In December 2017, Quilliam released a report entitled "Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation – Dissecting Grooming Gangs", concluding that 84% of offenders were of South Asian heritage.<ref>{{cite news|last=Barnes|first=Tom|date=10 December 2017|title=British-Pakistani researchers say grooming gangs are 84% Asian|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/quilliam-grooming-gangs-report-asian-abuse-rotherham-rochdale-newcastle-a8101941.html|access-date=16 December 2020|website=]}}</ref> This report was fiercely criticised for its poor methodology by Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail, in their paper "Failing victims, fuelling hate: challenging the harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' narrative" which was published in January 2020.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Cockbain|first1=Ella|last2=Tufail|first2=Waqas|date=1 January 2020|title=Failing victims, fuelling hate: challenging the harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' narrative|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396819895727|journal=Race & Class|language=en|volume=61|issue=3|pages=3–32|doi=10.1177/0306396819895727|s2cid=214197388|issn=0306-3968}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Malik|first=Kenan|date=11 November 2018|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/11/84-per-cent-of-grooming-gangs-are-asians-we-dont-know-if-that-figure-is-right|title=We're told 84% of grooming gangs are Asian. But where's the evidence?|work=The Guardian|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201225190032/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/11/84-per-cent-of-grooming-gangs-are-asians-we-dont-know-if-that-figure-is-right|archive-date=25 December 2020|access-date=25 December 2020}}</ref> In December that year, a further report by the ] was released, showing that the majority of CSE gangs were, in fact, composed of white men.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/944206/Group-based_CSE_Paper.pdf|title=Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation: Characteristics of Offending|date=December 2020|publisher=]}}</ref><ref name="Grierson"/>
===The Hijab Debate===


<blockquote>Research has found that group-based child sexual exploitation offenders are most commonly white. Some studies suggest an overrepresentation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.
Quilliam support the right of women to wear the hijab and the right of women to take it off. In an commentary in the Sun newspaper, Maajid Nawaz stated: "If Muslims object to the French ban on the hijab, we must also object to the `Islamist` plan to impose the hijab and ban women uncovering their hair." <ref> , 19 Apr 2008</ref>
:– ]<ref name="Grierson">{{cite news|last=Grierson|first=Jamie|date=15 December 2020|title=Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/15/child-sexual-abuse-gangs-white-men-home-office-report|access-date=16 December 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref></blockquote>


Writing in '']'', Cockbain and Tufail wrote of the report that "The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim".<ref name="ecwt">{{cite news|last1=Cockbain|first1=Ella|last2=Tufail|first2=Waqas|date=19 December 2020|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/19/home-office-report-grooming-gangs-not-muslim|title=A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a 'Muslim problem'|work=The Guardian|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201219232051/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/19/home-office-report-grooming-gangs-not-muslim|access-date=19 December 2020|archive-date=19 December 2020}}</ref>
===Philosophical beginnings===


===Focus on Islamism===
] spent a number of years in an Egyptian prison where he came into contact with state sanctioned ideas. Much appear to be influenced by writings of secularists like al-Ashmawi: “Islamists confuse Sharia and fiqh”, “Egyptian law is consistent with the Sharia”, “Governance is civil (secular) in Islam”, “There has never been a glorious Caliphate”, “Extremists are descendants of the earlier Khawarij” and “Religious governance is disastrous.”<ref>Shepard, W E, “Muhammad Said al-Ashmawi and the Application of the Sharia in Egypt”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, Feb 1996, Cambridge University Press, p. 43</ref>
In '']'', Tom Griffin criticised Nawaz for focusing on Islamism, and for defending "]" figures like ], ] and ].<ref name="Griffin"/>


<blockquote>The emergence of the counterjihad movement had previously been noted in the journal of the ] as early as 2008. The most comprehensive study of the US counterjihad movement, Fear Inc., by the ], identified its key activists including Frank Gaffney of the ] and David Horowitz of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, both conspiracy theorists who have claimed ] aide ] is an agent of the ]; as well as Pamela Gellar and Robert Spencer, the co-founders of Stop the Islamization of America. These in turn were funded by a small number of key conservative foundations such as the ], the ], the ] and the Abstraction Fund.</blockquote>
The Quilliam Foundation opposes Hizb ut-Tahrir’s epistemological outlook contending the standard Civitas view that an ideological mode of thought represses truth.<ref name=autogenerated7>CIVITAS, "The West, Islam and Islamism", http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cs29.pdf, retrieved 5th June 2008, p. 19</ref> Rashad Ali’s presentation at the Institute of Ideas states, <blockquote>“There is a number of reasons why they believe the Quran is divine and the prophetic narrations are divine… They have a set of intelligible arguments for this…”<ref name=autogenerated7 /></blockquote>


===Typology=== ==See also==
* ]
The Quilliam Foundation believes Islam to be a faith like other religions, a personal and private religion as opposed to an ideology.<ref name=autogenerated3></ref> Critics argue a review of its advisors highlights the source of this perspective - the Policy Exchange describes Islam as "a religion practiced by Muslims worldwide" and Islamism as "a political ideology that aims to create a state and society in strict conformity with religious doctrine." Civitas describes Islam as “the Arabic word denoting submission or self-surrender to Allah as revealed through the message and life of his Prophet Mohammed” and Islamism as “radical, militantly ideological versions of Islam, as interpreted by the practitioners and in which violent actions such as terrorism, suicide bombings or revolutions are explicitly advocated, practised and justified using religious terminology”.<ref>CIVITAS, "The West, Islam and Islamism", http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cs29.pdf</ref>
* ]


== Citations ==
Quilliam say “Islam, like other world faiths, is a religion, not a political ideology”<ref name=autogenerated3 /> and “the Islamist ideology is incompatible with Islam” and “ we need a Prophet to define a political ideology”<ref name=autogenerated4 /> show the argument to be disingenuous – objecting to defining Islam as a “political ideology” rather than defining Islam as an “ideology”. The attempt reminiscent of modernists suggests Islam is not inherently political and Muslim activists are attempting to politicise it through the use of ideologies. The same argument is presented by ] politicians:
{{Reflist}}
<blockquote>…respect for Islam as a religion of peace suggests by implication that Islamic activism in general is un-Islamic, a perverse exploitation of religion for political ends, and that jihadi activism in particular -- conceived as merely the extremist end of the Islamist spectrum - is simply evil. But while it is rooted in the understandable concern of Western governments to make clear that "the war against terrorism" is not a war of religion, this approach renders jihadi activism inexplicable in terms of cause and effect….<ref> "Understanding Islamism", International Crisis Group, http://merln.ndu.edu/archive/icg/Islamism2Mar05.pdf </ref></blockquote>


== General and cited references ==
===Politics of terminology===
* {{cite book | last= Nawaz| first= Maajid|author2=Tom Bromley | year=2012|title= Radical| location= London| publisher= W.H. Allen| isbn= 978-0753540770| title-link= Radical: My Journey out of Islamist Extremism}}
The Quilliam Foundation argues that “ are extreme because of their rigidity in understanding politics”<ref>“Pulling together to defeat terror”, http://quilliamfoundation.org/images/stories/pdfs/pulling-together-to-defeat-terror.pdf, p. 3 </ref>.

], a researcher specializing in the study of political fringe movements, defines extremism by identifying 21 traits of "political extremists".<ref>Wilcox, L and George, J, “Nazis, Communists, Klansmen and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America”, Prometheus Books, 1992</ref> Applying these styles to the pronouncements and publications of the Quilliam Foundation paradoxically classify it as an extremist organization,that has a tendency to character assassination, name calling and labelling and the making of irresponsible, sweeping generalizations.

Islamism<ref>Western academics use the term “Islamism” instead of "fundamentalism" to refer to Islamic anti-secularism. This term is also used by Islamic anti-secularists to refer to themselves. Muhammad 'Amara thus uses it (islamiyyan) referring to those who, opposing secularism and Western hegemony, are "committed to the Islamic coloring and the Islamic standard." - Burgat, F, “Islamic Movement”, pp. 39-41, 67-71, 309</ref> has been defined as “the belief that Islam should guide social and political as well as personal life”<ref>Berman, S, “Islamism, Revolution, and Civil Society, Perspectives on Politics”, Vol. 1, No. 2, Jun 2003, American Political Science Association, p. 258</ref>. ] are usually defined in converse to “Islamists” as “any view that openly rejects Islamism” or “any view that would follow an ideology other than Islam in most areas of public life”<ref>Fazlur Rahman says, "Secularism in Islam... is the acceptance of laws and other social and political institutions without reference to Islam, Islamic modernism... means precisely the induction of change into the content of the Shari'a" - "Islamic Modernism", p. 311; Shepard, W E, op cit, 1987, p. 309</ref> – the Quilliam Foundation being amongst the secularists by this definition.

Critics argue the Quilliam Foundation introduces its own definitions:
<blockquote>“The modernist attempt to claim that political sovereignty belongs to God, that the Shari'ah equates to state law, and it is a religious duty on all Muslims to create a political entity that reflects the above… Islamism is the belief that Islam is a political ideology”<ref name=autogenerated6></ref></blockquote>
Husain’s definition of Islamism comprises:<ref>Husain, E, “My qualm is with Islamism and not with Islam”, retrieved 10th May 2008, http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/ed_husain_my_qualm_is_with_islamism_and_not_with_islam/</ref>
· the rejection of 1400 years of Muslim traditional scholarship and re-reading of scripture with political lenses
· a world view that's based on eventually at some stage confronting the West
· the rejection of mainstream Muslims giving them all sorts of labels such as 'non-practising Muslims', 'jahils', 'partial Muslims'
· those individuals from al-Qaida to Ikhwan who believe sovereignty is for God
· underwritten by the works of particular writers - Mawdudi, Syed Qutb, al-Nabhani and Fathi Yaqoun

These definitions dichotomise Muslims into two camps, the Islamists and non-Islamists, mirroring comments from Western leaders:"…on the one hand, Islam qua religion and its adherents - 'ordinary decent Muslims' for whom 'Islam' is a matter of personal piety, not political commitment - and, on the other hand, 'Islamism' or 'political Islam' - by implication an affair of a minority of agitators exploiting the faith of their fellow-Muslims for political ends, stirring up resentment, constituting a problem for Western interests and 'friendly' Muslim states alike."

Scholarly treatments of the subject analyzed particular national Islamist movements and the regimes they confront.<ref>Berman, S, op cit, 2003, p. 258</ref> The ]'s report makes the point:
<blockquote>…the conception of 'political Islam' inherent in this dichotomy is unhistorical as well as self-serving. The term 'political Islam' is an American coinage which came into circulation in the wake of the Iranian revolution. It implied or presupposed that an 'apolitical Islam' had been the norm until Khomeini turned things upside down. In fact, Islam had been a highly politicised religion for generations before 1979. It only appeared to have become apolitical in the historically specific and short lived heyday of secular Arab nationalism between 1945 and 1970.<ref name=autogenerated9>"Understanding Islamism", International Crisis Group, http://merln.ndu.edu/archive/icg/Islamism2Mar05.pdf</ref></blockquote>

The ICG thus suggests a more meaningful definition of Islamist, terming it synonymous with “Islamic activism”:<blockquote>the active assertion and promotion of beliefs, prescriptions, laws or policies that are held to be Islamic in character.</blockquote>

===Political thought===
] is the study of fundamental and normative questions about the state, government, politics, liberty, justice, property, rights, law and the enforcement of a legal code by authority: what they are, why (or even if) they are needed, what makes a government legitimate, what rights and freedoms it should protect and why, what form it should take and why, what the law is, and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government, if any, and when it may be legitimately overthrown—if ever. Quilliam’s position is “Islam has no role in politics” and sovereignty is not solely for God. Secular democracy is advocated in place of the classical Islamic theology of the Caliphate and existing dictatorial post-colonial regimes in the Muslim world are legitimate.

Husain argues against fundamental notions such as “sovereignty is for God”, arguing the Arabic term siyaadah does not appear in the Quran. However, technical terms used by jurists were coined to reflect concepts found in the revelation and usually did not appear in divine texts. ] uses the term ] for ] whereas ] and ] use the term ] – all cite verses where judgment (hukm) is ascribed to Allah alone (12:40, 12:67, 5:44, 5:45, and 5:47).<ref>Akhavi, S, op cit, 1997, Cambridge University Press, p. 386</ref>

===Neoconservatives===

Critics have called the Quilliam Foundation another neoconservative organisation. David Edgar of ''the Guardian'' cited “all three are straight out of the cold war defectors' mould trading heavily on their former associations and traveling rapidly in a conservative direction”.{{Fact|date=March 2009}}
The Quilliam Foundation has recruited the likes of Tory frontbencher ], ] and ], director of the liberal think tank ], as advisers. {{Fact|date=March 2009}}

Husain's book was greeted with enthusiasm last year by British neoconservatives such as Tory frontbencher ] and '']'' columnist ].<ref>“All mod cons”, http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/seumas_milne/2007/04/all_mod_cons.htm</ref> Nawaz has befriended ], author of “Neoconservatism: Why we need it”. When asked to criticize neoconservatism in a ] discussion, he said to Murray, "I mean American Neoconservatism, but not the British Neoconservatism."<ref>Al-Qadi, H, “Transferable Egos of Ed Husain, Maajid Nawaz and Ziauddin Sardar”, http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showthread.php?t=9240&page=13</ref>

The Quilliam Foundation defends the regimes in the Muslim world and their systems as being consistent with Islam. It believes that if any reform is needed the existing systems should be modified, allowing more representation, accountability and population centred policies, rather than demolishing the system and replacing it with something new.

===Jurisprudential revisionism===
The Quilliam Foundation is undertaking theological revisionism in line with its views on modernity<ref>“The Exposition of Modernist and Revisionist Thought”, http://traditionalislamism.wordpress.com/academic-refutations/</ref> to support its objective of creating a Western Islam.<ref>“Pulling together to defeat terror”, http://quilliamfoundation.org/images/stories/pdfs/pulling-together-to-defeat-terror.pdf, p. 2</ref> This section reviews its theological pronouncements along with a comparative analysis of the theological positions of the classical jurists and also that of Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Historically the science of Usul al-Fiqh was developed to determine the sources of Islamic law, rules of interpretation, philosophy and rationale and procedures by which the law is to be applied and extended. Over the centuries two main approaches were identified by the Sunni jurists, that of the Hanafites and the Shaffites.

The Quilliam Foundation has not documented its methodology. It claims it follows classical scholarship, without stating which historical legal school it follows, however its publications imply a methodology that is neither orthodox nor traditional – resembling the modernist approach to jurisprudence:
· Reduction of Quranic revelation to ethical principles such as mercy, reason and justice,
· Use of categories of ibadaat and muamalaat to infer human moral agency in matters of muamalaat especially politics,
· Careful selection of Quranic ayaat based on potential utility,
· Category errors due to viewing different realities as homogenous – e.g., jihad to free land from occupation being equated to war against civilians,
· Rejection of laws by arbitrary “contextualisation” – e.g., implemented laws were relevant to Arabia of the time and not relevant today, and,
· Legal systems in Muslim countries being in accordance with Sharia – e.g., the Egyptian French Napoleonic code is equated with Islamic jurisprudence.

The absence of any substantive methodology negates any juristic arguments the Foundation may advocate.

Much of Quilliam Foundation’s jurisprudence has been controversial and is regularly aired by Husain – receiving considerable criticism.<ref>In his critique of Husain, Andrew Booso references from Nuh Keller’s translation of the classical Shaffite handbook of Islamic law, “Reliance of the Traveller”:
* A father marrying off a virgin bride ‘without her consent’ where he may ‘compel’ her (m3.13-3.15)
* Offensive jihad (see o9.1), with the objective being to fight ‘Jews, Christians… until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax’ (o9.8)
* The Islamic state not retaliating against a Muslim for killing a non-Muslim (o1.2).
* It being ‘obligatory for Muslims to rise against’ a leader of the government if he ‘becomes a non-Muslim, alters the Sacred Law … or imposes reprehensible innovations while in office’…
* It being ‘obligatory to obey the commands and interdictions of the caliph… even if he is unjust’ (o25.5).
* ‘Non-Muslim subjects… are distinguished from Muslims in dress… must keep to the side of the street’ (o11.5) - “Review of “The Islamist”: Ust. Andrew Booso ”, http://thetranslators1.wordpress.com/2007/05/21/review-of-%E2%80%9Cthe-islamist%E2%80%9D-ust-andrew-booso-complete/</ref> His juristic arguments have regularly proven to be incorrect despite his insistence that he follows traditional classical scholarship. Regarding apostasy, Husain debated it did not appear in the Quran, subtly omitting its mention in the Sunnah<ref>“Centre hosts debate between Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Ed Husain”, http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/blog/2007/11/centre_hosts_debate_between_ay_1.html, and http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/nov/26/stopsupportingbinladengeor</ref> – however the matter appears in both and is argued as such by numerous classical scholars.<ref>“And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can. And whoso becomes a renegade and dies in his disbelief: such are they whose works have fallen both in the world and the Hereafter." (Quran 2:217) and “But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever you find them” (Quran 4:89). Baydawi explained this verse as, "Whosoever turns back from his belief, openly or secretly, take him and kill him wherever you find him, like any other infidel.” Furthermore, narrations state, "If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him" (Bukhari 4.52.60) and "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." (Bukhari 9.84.57)</ref>

===Shariah penal punishments===

Ed Husain has said that some ] ] punishments are not applicable in the modern age <ref> http://ummahpulse.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=272&Itemid=38 BBC Radio Interview</ref>. In response to another Muslim who was trying to argue that punishing women exclusively for ] rather than both the man and woman based on strict conditions (see ]) was not mandated by Islam, Ed responded to contradict the Muslim reconfirming the notion that exclusively women only are punished saying "In the time of Muhammad stoning did take place... we have other modes of reaching the noble aims of the shariah... why do we need to go down that barbaric, ihumane, outdated mode of stoning, and flogging people.... Let's bring an end to this madness of stoning, flogging and amputating...." <ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today4_muhammad_20071129.ram Radio 4 Today program interview </ref>

===Eastern Islam or Western Islam===
The Quilliam Foundation argues for the creation of a new “Western Islam”,<ref></ref> modelled on Andalusian Spain between 711 and 1492 AD,<ref>The Quilliam Foundation may not have realised the length of time Islam existed in Spain</ref> raising the question,<blockquote>“…what the hell was the Islam of ]? Could Maajid or Eddy explain that in more detail? Is it the Islam of ] and ]…, who believed in jihad and shari'ah? Is it the Islam of the Arabs and ] who invaded the Iberian Peninsula and waged jihad against the Visigoth Christians and other Christian powers?”<ref></ref></blockquote>

The period of the Caliphate is seen by Muslim writers as the golden age of al-Andalus. Crops produced using irrigation, along with food imported from the Middle East, provided the area with an agricultural economic sector by far the most advanced in Europe. Among European cities, Córdoba under the Caliphate overtook Constantinople as the largest and most prosperous city in Europe, one of the leading cultural centres. The work of its most important philosophers and scientists<ref>notably Abulcasis and Averroes</ref> had a major influence on the intellectual life of medieval Europe. The jurisprudence of Andalusian Spain, ] law, was that of much of North Africa.<ref>Hallaq, W, “The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law”, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p.169 and pp.174-5</ref> There appears little substantive difference between the Islam implemented in Spain and that implemented in the rest of the Muslim world. The Quilliam Foundation does not explain how its version of “Western Islam” differs from “Eastern Islam” nor the criteria and theology underpinning this idea.

The Foundation's inspiration derives from two historical projects - the first undertaken by the Indian ruler ] (1591) who commenced with legislating religious freedom and tolerance and then established a new religion, fusing Islam and Hinduism. Akbar failed in his effort, being generally seen as an apostate by Muslims and his rule was regarded as an exception to the Islamic rule over India. The second project was that of the 19th century reformists ], ] and ],<ref>Said, E, “Orientalism”, Vintage Books, New York, 1979</ref> influenced by European thought, who argued European institutions and social processes could be accommodated by Islam, providing precedents in Islamic history that would provide justification. ] received backing from ] whilst ] was a member of French Masonic lodges.<ref>Dallal, A, “Appropriating the past: Twentieth-Century Reconstruction of Pre-Modern Islamic Thought”, Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2000), Brill, pp. 334-37</ref>

===Terrorism===
The Quilliam Foundation that Muslims have failed to doing enough to fight political extremism.<ref></ref> For instance, the launch pamphlet states:
<blockquote>“Just as Western policies in Afghanistan, coupled with the growth of an aggressive Islamist ideology over the last two decades have contributed to the creation of international terrorism...”<ref>“Pulling together to defeat terror”, http://quilliamfoundation.org/images/stories/pdfs/pulling-together-to-defeat-terror.pdf</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Our foreign and domestic policies… have created an environment wherein Islamist politics and ideology can spread and therefore can be manipulated into providing political justifications for terrorist theology....<ref>Comment – Rashad, http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/how-can-we-fight-islamist-extremism/</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Undoubtedly, foreign policy has some role to play but let's not forget that countries such as Indonesia (Bali), Turkey, Egypt, Algeria and others have also suffered terrorism. Islamist terrorism started long before foreign policy blunders of Western government. The terrorists' targeting of nightclubs last year and talk of killing "slags" while they dance indicates a medieval mindset that cannot tolerate social freedoms.<ref name=autogenerated10 /></blockquote>

However, it is not only the “terrorists” who oppose these innovations and social freedoms that the Foundation approves of – most Muslims oppose nightclubs, drink, sexual indecency etc<ref>http://www.hizb.org.uk/hizb/news-watch/muslim-countries/dubai-bans-nudity-dancing-and-holding-hands.html</ref> and the authoritarian regimes that permit these are western educated elites imposed on their peoples.<ref>Esposito, J, "Oxford History of Islam" - S V R Nasr (European Colonialism), pp. 549-601</ref><ref>Another strategy that critics argue the foundation has adopted is the use of staged events with loaded agendas. The Doha debates in Qatar is a case in question - where Quilliam Foundation have been asked to speak at events where set questions include, “Are Muslims doing enough to address terrorism?” Inviting only those who do not question the underlying assumptions ensures there is little substantive discussion.</ref>

===Abdullah Quilliam===
Many of Abdullah Quilliam’s activities in nineteenth century Britain were remarkably similar to those currently undertaken by the Muslim activists in the West, particularly Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain.<ref>“Abdullah Quilliam: Shaikh-ul-Islam for the British Isles and Dominions”, http://www.caliphate.eu/2008/01/abdullah-quilliam-shaikh-ul-islam-for.html</ref>
<blockquote>“So the Foundation is named after a man who was an enemy of Britain - and the West - and whose sole loyalty was to Islam and to promoting the interests of Muslims. We have been warned. Hizb ut Tahrir at least have the merit of openness.” (WHYS)<ref></ref></blockquote>

Nawaz delivered a number of speeches whilst a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir and used Quilliam’s legacy to define the political role of Muslims in contemporary British society and its website details Quilliam’s legacy – albeit choosing to focus on those aspects that purport its version of Islam.<ref>Calling the society to Islam as an alternative way of life, maintaining the Islamic identity of British Muslims and undertaking Islamic political activity, accounting the British government whilst calling for the unity of the Muslim world under the Caliphate system.</ref>

] has highlighted the attempt to project Abdullah Quilliam as a kind of proto-Brownite patriot, a social entrepreneur working in the third sector.<ref>“Abdullah Quilliam: Britain’s First Islamist?”, http://www.yahyabirt.com/?p=136</ref> This would not be the first time – accusations of revisionism were made in the blogs Nawaz contributed to<ref>http://www.tftd.ws/; “The twisting of ahadith to justify the abandonment of the Shariah”, http://islamicsystem.blogspot.com/2007/08/twisting-of-ahadith-to-justify.html, Ahmed, A.S., “Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise”, Routledge, 1992, pp. 168-69</ref> before he published the first (and only) in his series of papers where he tried to refute the intellectual basis of the “Islamists”.


==External links== ==External links==
* {{Official website|http://www.quilliaminternational.com/}}
*
* *
*
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131010152319/http://lyonspress.com/radical-9780762791361 |date=10 October 2013 }}
*
*
*
*
*


{{Authority control}}
==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Quilliam (Think Tank)}}
==See also==
]
<div style="-moz-column-count:3;">
]

]
*]
*] ]
]
*]
]

] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]

]

Latest revision as of 03:11, 21 December 2024

British counter-extremism think-tank

Quilliam
Founded2008 (2008)
FounderEd Husain
Maajid Nawaz
Rashad Zaman Ali
Dissolved2021
Location
Key peopleMaajid Nawaz
Rashad Zaman Ali
Haras Rafiq
David Toube
Employees10

Quilliam was a British think tank co-founded in 2008 by Maajid Nawaz that focused on counter-extremism, specifically against Islamism, which it argued represents a desire to impose a given interpretation of Islam on society. Founded as The Quilliam Foundation and based in London, it claimed to lobby government and public institutions for more nuanced policies regarding Islam and on the need for greater democracy in the Muslim world whilst empowering "moderate Muslim" voices. The organisation opposed any Islamist ideology and championed freedom of expression. The critique of Islamist ideology by its founders―Nawaz, Rashad Zaman Ali and Ed Husain―was based, in part, on their personal experiences. Quilliam went into liquidation in 2021.

History

2007: Foundation and terminology

Abdullah Quilliam

Quilliam was established in 2007 by Ed Husain, Maajid Nawaz and Rashad Zaman Ali, three former members of the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir. Husain left in 2011 to join the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. Douglas Murray, who founded the Centre for Social Cohesion (which later morphed into the Henry Jackson Society), claimed: "Around the time Ed Husain came to public notice, I recruited him to work with me (through Civitas, the organisation that originally hosted the CSC). He liked my views and I had great hopes for him to become a source for real reform. This gave him the time and financial freedom to set up ."

The organisation was named after Abdullah Quilliam, a 19th-century British convert to Islam who founded Britain's first mosque. The organisation was originally called The Quilliam Foundation, but later rebranded as simply Quilliam.

Quilliam defined Islamism in the following terms:

It is the belief that Islam is a political ideology, as well as a faith. It is a modernist claim that political sovereignty belongs to God, that the Shari'ah should be used as state law, that Muslims form a political rather than a religious bloc around the world and that it is a religious duty for all Muslims to create a political entity that is governed as such. Islamism is a spectrum, with Islamists disagreeing over how they should bring their 'Islamic' state into existence. Some Islamists seek to engage with existing political systems, others reject the existing systems as illegitimate but do so non-violently, and others seek to create an 'Islamic state' through violence. Most Islamists are socially modern but others advocate a more retrograde lifestyle. Islamists often have contempt for Muslim scholars and sages and their traditional institutions; as well as a disdain for non-Islamist Muslims and the West.

Quilliam argued that Islam is a faith, not an ideology, and that "Islam is not Islamism". It also argues that " are extreme because of their rigidity in understanding politics".

The organization's goals were mainly communicated in three ways: through the publication of reports, through involvement with the media, i.e. by taking part in interviews and discussions across Europe and the Middle East, and through its "Outreach and Training" unit, which delivers a "radicalisation awareness programme".

2008: Gaza War

On 30 December 2008, just days after the outbreak of the Gaza War, Husain condemned the "ruthless air strikes and economic blockade" of Gaza city by Israel. He predicted that the result would be "rightful support for the beleaguered Palestinian peoples – and a boost to the popularity of Hamas by default".

2010: "Prevent" strategy

On 14 June 2010, a strategic briefing paper with a covering letter signed by Nawaz and Hussain was sent to Charles Farr, director of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism (OSCT). The briefing paper was intended to be a confidential review of the UK government's anti-terrorism "Prevent" strategy following the 7 July 2005 London bombings, and was "particularly critical of the view that government partnerships with non-violent yet otherwise extreme Islamists were the best way to fend off Jihadism". Although sent "by hard copy alone" with no electronic version, both letter and briefing paper were leaked by being scanned and published on the internet, provoking protests from various groups which had been identified in the Quilliam briefing as sympathetic or supportive of Islamist extremism. According to the briefing document, "The ideology of non-violent Islamists is broadly the same as that of violent Islamists; they disagree only on tactics."

Quilliam's report claimed that a unit within Scotland Yard called the Muslim Contact Unit, and a separate independent group called the Muslim Safety Forum, intended to improve the relationship between the police and the Muslim community, were respectively "Islamist-dominated" and "associated with Jamaat e-Islami". Other organisations listed by the Quilliam report included the Muslim Council of Britain and its rival the Muslim Association of Britain, both said to be "associated with the Muslim brotherhood". Also said to have Islamist sympathies or to be associated with Islamist groups were the Islamic Human Rights Commission, the Federation of Student Islamic Societies, the Cordoba Foundation, and the Islam Channel.

The report said of these organisations: "These are a selection of the various groups and institutions active in the UK which are broadly sympathetic to Islamism. Whilst only a small proportion will agree with al-Qaida's tactics, many will agree with their overall goal of creating a single 'Islamic state' which would bring together all Muslims around the world under a single government and then impose on them a single interpretation of sharia as state law." Politicians described by the report as "Islamist-backed" included Salma Yaqoob, then leader of the Respect Party, and George Galloway, also from Respect. Inayat Bunglawala, chairman of Muslims4Uk and a former spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, and Fatima Khan, vice-chair of the Muslim Safety Forum, both described Quilliam's list as "McCarthyite". Bunglawala added: "In effect, Quilliam – a body funded very generously by the government through Prevent – are attempting to set themselves up as arbiters of who is and is not an acceptable Muslim."

A Home Office spokesman told the press that the report had not been solicited, but added: "We believe the Prevent programme isn't working as effectively as it could and want a strategy that is effective and properly focused – that is why we are reviewing it."

Nawaz told The Daily Telegraph: "Quilliam has a track record of distinguishing between legal tolerance and civil tolerance – we oppose banning non-violent extremists ... yet we see no reason why tax payers should subsidise them. It is in this context that we wish to raise awareness around Islamism."

2013: English Defence League controversy

On 8 October 2013, it was announced that the co-founders of the English Defence League (EDL), Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll, had had meetings with Quilliam and intended to leave the EDL. Robinson said that street protests were "no longer effective" and "acknowledged the dangers of far-right extremism". However, he also said that he intended to continue to combat radical Islamism by forming a new party. Both Robinson and Carroll began taking lessons in Islam from Quilliam member Usama Hasan, and stated their intention to train in lobbying institutions. However, in December 2015 Robinson, who founded the anti-Islamic organisation Pegida UK after leading the EDL, claimed that Quilliam had paid him a total of around £8000 over a period of six months so they could take credit for his exit from the EDL, although he said that he had already decided to leave the movement before coming into contact with Quilliam. Quilliam subsequently acknowledged that they had paid Robinson, although they characterised the payments as remuneration "for costs associated with outreach that he & Dr Usama Hassan did to Muslim communities after Tommy's departure from the EDL".

Quilliam had previously persuaded another member of the EDL, Nick Jode, to leave the EDL. Jode had been persuaded by the writings and on-line videos of Maajid Nawaz speaking on behalf of Quilliam, being particularly impressed by Nawaz's debate with Anjem Choudary of the Islamist group Islam4UK.

2016: Dispute with Southern Poverty Law Center

See also: Maajid Nawaz § SPLC claim

In October 2016, the U.S. Southern Poverty Law Center accused Nawaz of being an "anti-Muslim extremist". In June 2018, the SPLC apologised and paid $3.375 million to Nawaz and Quilliam "to fund their work to fight anti-Muslim bigotry and extremism".

2021: Dissolution

The Quilliam Foundation Ltd was put into liquidation on 9 April 2021. The same day, Nawaz posted on Twitter: "Due to the hardship of maintaining a non-profit during COVID lockdowns, we took the tough decision to close Quilliam down for good. This was finalised today. A huge thank you to all those who supported us over the years. We are now looking forward to a new post-covid future".

Funding

When Quilliam launched in 2007, the Home Office provided it with £674,608 of funding. In January 2009, The Times published an article claiming that Quilliam had received almost £1 million from the British government. The article also said that some "members of the Government and the Opposition" had questioned the wisdom of "relying too heavily on a relatively unknown organisation … to counter extremism".

From 2011 onwards, Quilliam received no government, i.e. "public", funding. In the BBC programme HARDtalk, Nawaz explained that "the reason it was cut was because we disagreed at the time with the direction the government was headed. Now that the strategy has changed, and the policy of government has changed, what we haven't done is revitalize those funding relationships; but rather now we're 100% privately funded, which I'm happy with because of course it allows me to do the work without having to face the questions about which government is funding you and whether we're pursuing a government line or not."

With the sudden cut in 2011, Quilliam operated at a loss that year.

According to its political liaison officer, Jonathan Russell, the removal of public funding has been to Quilliam's advantage, as "it can remain ideas-focused, non-partisan and continue its own pursuits."

In 2012, the foundation received $75,000 from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which funds the David Horowitz Freedom Center. Quilliam also won a grant of over $1 million from the John Templeton Foundation.

The organisation also received £35,000 from banker and BBC chairman, Richard Sharp via his charity, the Sharp Foundation. When asked why he did this, Sharp said he was impressed by Quilliam's "efforts to combat radicalism and extremism".

Controversies

Criticism of its tactics

Despite Quilliam's claims to oppose extremism of any kind, it had numerous critics. According to Alex MacDonald in Middle East Eye, the organisation was "regularly accused of authoritarianism as well as targeting Muslim groups across the UK and tarring them with the "extremist" label with little evidence." In October 2009, The Guardian revealed that Husain was in favour of Muslims being spied upon by the British state even if they were not suspected of committing crimes; Husain is quoted as saying, "It is gathering intelligence on people not committing terrorist offences. If it is to prevent people getting killed and committing terrorism, it is good and it is right." Douglas Murray described this attitude as 'appallingly illiberal'.

Sayeeda Warsi, the first female Muslim member of a British Cabinet, described Quilliam in her book The Enemy Within (2017) as "a bunch of men whose beards are tame, accents crisp, suits sharp, and who have a message the government wants to hear".

After Quilliam folded in April 2021, Malia Bouattia, former president of the National Union of Students, stated that "for 13 years Quilliam reinforced the idea that Muslims are a suspect community and supported the draconian “counter-terrorism” policies being pushed by the government." She claimed the foundation "leaves behind a toxic legacy, which will continue to harm the Muslim community in the United Kingdom and beyond."

Henry Jackson Society

Quilliam worked with the Henry Jackson Society, a neoconservative think tank whose Associate Director, Douglas Murray, supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq and has described Islamophobia as "a crock". In 2006, Murray also called for an end to "all immigration into Europe from Muslim countries".

Grooming gangs

Main article: Muslim grooming gangs in the United Kingdom

In December 2017, Quilliam released a report entitled "Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation – Dissecting Grooming Gangs", concluding that 84% of offenders were of South Asian heritage. This report was fiercely criticised for its poor methodology by Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail, in their paper "Failing victims, fuelling hate: challenging the harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' narrative" which was published in January 2020. In December that year, a further report by the Home Office was released, showing that the majority of CSE gangs were, in fact, composed of white men.

Research has found that group-based child sexual exploitation offenders are most commonly white. Some studies suggest an overrepresentation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.

Home Office

Writing in The Guardian, Cockbain and Tufail wrote of the report that "The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim".

Focus on Islamism

In openDemocracy, Tom Griffin criticised Nawaz for focusing on Islamism, and for defending "counterjihad" figures like Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and Frank Gaffney.

The emergence of the counterjihad movement had previously been noted in the journal of the Royal United Services Institute as early as 2008. The most comprehensive study of the US counterjihad movement, Fear Inc., by the Center for American Progress, identified its key activists including Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy and David Horowitz of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, both conspiracy theorists who have claimed Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin is an agent of the Muslim Brotherhood; as well as Pamela Gellar and Robert Spencer, the co-founders of Stop the Islamization of America. These in turn were funded by a small number of key conservative foundations such as the Donors Capital Fund, the Scaife Foundations, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and the Abstraction Fund.

See also

Citations

  1. "Quilliam Foundation: A Muslim Think Tank to Counter Extremism - Qantara.de". Qantara.de - Dialogue with the Islamic World.
  2. Nawaz (2012): pp. 352–353
  3. ^ Ahmed, Nafeez (11 May 2021). "The Charmed Life and Strange, Sad Death of the Quilliam Foundation". Byline Times. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  4. Nawaz (2012): p. 327
  5. "Quilliam". Quilliam. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008.
  6. "Frequently Asked Questions – What is Islamism?". Quilliam. Archived from the original on 18 October 2013. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
  7. Maajid Nawaz states "Islamists are at odds with Islam as a faith. Islam is a faith not an ideology" How I'll fight against Islamic extremism Archived 17 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  8. "Ed Husain: You Ask The Questions". London: Independent. 14 April 2008. Archived from the original on 13 January 2018.
  9. "Pulling together to defeat terror" p. 3" (PDF). Quilliam. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2014. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
  10. ^ Husain, Ed (30 December 2008). "Britain has a duty to Arabs". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  11. ^ Engelhart, Katie (10 October 2013). "Revealing Quilliam, the Muslim Destroyers of the English Far-Right". Vice. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  12. ^ Nawaz (2012): p. 348
  13. "Quilliam: Preventing Terrorism: where next for Britain?". Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  14. ^ Dodd, Vikram (4 August 2010). "List sent to terror chief aligns peaceful Muslim groups with terrorist ideology". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  15. ^ Gardham, Duncan (5 August 2010). "Mainstream Islamic organisations 'share al-Qaeda ideology'". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 November 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  16. Quilliam "Preventing Terrorism: where next for Britain?" Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine: p. 4
  17. Quilliam "Preventing Terrorism: where next for Britain?" Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine: p. 60
  18. Quilliam "Preventing Terrorism: where next for Britain?" Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine: p. 59
  19. Milmo, Cahal (8 October 2013). "EDL leader Tommy Robinson turns his back on his own party over 'dangers of far-right extremism'". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 9 October 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
  20. Hopkins, Steven (10 December 2015). "Tommy Robinson, Former EDL Leader, Claims Quilliam Paid Him To Quit Far-Right Group". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 16 October 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  21. "Statement regarding Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam Foundation". SPLCenter.org. SPLC. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  22. Matt Naham (18 June 2018). "Southern Poverty Law Center Must Pay $3.3 Million After Falsely Naming Anti-Muslim Extremists". Law & Crime. Archived from the original on 19 June 2018. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  23. "THE QUILLIAM FOUNDATION LTD". Companies House. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  24. ^ MacDonald, Alex (9 April 2021). "Quilliam: British 'counter-extremist' group closes citing lack of funds". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  25. Kerbaj, Richard (20 January 2009). "Government gives £1m to anti-extremist think-tank Quilliam Foundation". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 15 August 2011.
  26. ^ Russell, Jonathan (29 October 2013). "Perspectives: The Quilliam Foundation – fighting extremism". BBC Religion & Ethics. Archived from the original on 31 October 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  27. BBC Hard Talk, 14 August 2012 Archived 28 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine: video from 21:14.
  28. Quinn, Ben (12 October 2013). "Tommy Robinson link with Quilliam Foundation raises questions". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 31 October 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  29. ^ Griffin, Tom (7 November 2016). "The problem with the Quilliam Foundation". openDemocracy. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  30. ^ Bouattia, Malia (20 April 2021). "The Quilliam Foundation has closed but its toxic legacy remains". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  31. ^ Bridge Initiative Team (19 May 2021). "Quilliam | Factsheet: Islam, Muslims, Islamophobia". Bridge Initiative. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  32. Oborne, Peter (13 January 2021). "Richard Sharp's donations to Quilliam raise questions about his BBC chairmanship". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  33. MEE staff (13 January 2021). "BBC chair donated to Quilliam because he was 'impressed' by Maajid Nawaz". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  34. Dodd, Vikram (16 October 2009). "Spying morally right, says thinktank". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  35. Hough, Andrew (17 October 2009). "Anti-extremism scheme 'spying on Muslims'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  36. Murray, Douglas (23 October 2009). "Quilliam's toxic take on liberty". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  37. Oborne, Peter (6 May 2017). "Moral of Warsi: Tories can't cope with Muslims". Middle East Eye. Archived from the original on 13 June 2017. Retrieved 3 June 2017.
  38. "HJS welcomes new Senior Research Fellow at Centre for the Response to Radicalisation and Terrorism". Henry Jackson Society. 22 May 2017. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  39. Bolton, Peter (22 May 2021). "The Spectator is now plumbing the depths of desperation while trying to defend Israel". The Canary. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  40. Hasan, Mehdi (30 July 2013). "Douglas Murray, the EDL, Dodgy Videos and Me". HuffPost UK. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  41. Barnes, Tom (10 December 2017). "British-Pakistani researchers say grooming gangs are 84% Asian". The Independent. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  42. Cockbain, Ella; Tufail, Waqas (1 January 2020). "Failing victims, fuelling hate: challenging the harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' narrative". Race & Class. 61 (3): 3–32. doi:10.1177/0306396819895727. ISSN 0306-3968. S2CID 214197388.
  43. Malik, Kenan (11 November 2018). "We're told 84% of grooming gangs are Asian. But where's the evidence?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 December 2020. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  44. "Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation: Characteristics of Offending" (PDF). Home Office. December 2020.
  45. ^ Grierson, Jamie (15 December 2020). "Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  46. Cockbain, Ella; Tufail, Waqas (19 December 2020). "A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a 'Muslim problem'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 December 2020. Retrieved 19 December 2020.

General and cited references

External links

Categories: