| Revision as of 19:31, 18 November 2009 editPeter Lee (talk | contribs)342 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:08, 9 December 2013 edit undoPeter Lee (talk | contribs)342 edits Cleaned up. Everything here was almost 5 years old. | ||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Cleaned up. Everything here was almost 5 years old. | |||
| == AN/I == | |||
| Hi I wanted to let you know there is a conversation regarding you ] here regarding your recent edits. Regards - ] (]) 05:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: Thanks for the information. ] (]) 06:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please remember to mark your edits{{#if:User talk:4twenty42o|, such as your recent edits to ],}} as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see ]). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> ] (]) 06:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the reminder. ] (]) 06:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I moved the conversation on my talk page to the archive and copied to the article talk. Please respond as needed there and leave my talk for other matters. Regards - ] (]) 07:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' to prevent further ] caused by your engagement in an ] at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 08:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)</div>{{z9}}<!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
| To clarify, your conduct in this matter has been quite unacceptable, both in your engagement in an ] and the extreme ] in your edit summaries. The only reason that the blocking period is as short as it is is due to the fact that you stopped the edit war after being warned, but given your tenure here, you should be well aware that both edit warring and incivility are unacceptable. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 08:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|There has been NO edit war AFTER Frmatt explained the Three-Revert-Rule and gave me a warning that we would be blocked if we would continue to do so. Since that, there was NO reverting anymore. Why would you now suddenly decide for a block after all??? When you drive too fast, does the police stop you and then say "Hey, you get a warning, don't do it again... Oh, you know what, I am giving you a fine after all!"?!? This being totally unfair, also because I did seek consultation, but nobody responded, while the slandering and deletion of facts on WGKF continued (as a matter of fact, the slander has already been going on for 4-5 years!!! Why didn't anybody see that?) I request that you remove the block immediately, so I can come up with constructive proposals on this problem.}} | |||
| :Note to reviewing admin. His partener in war was unblocked by the blocking editor with much of the same reason. Both have agreed to discuss future changes. Regards - ] (]) 19:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: Thank you to 4twenty42o. I was actually at the same time as you deleted the undue comment from Mario myself making a less pleasant reply to him, but you and I had an edit conflict. Thus my reply was not saved. Maybe it was for the best. Now please keep that deceitful culprit away from my talk page. He is in no way wanted here! ] (]) 19:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:08, 9 December 2013
Cleaned up. Everything here was almost 5 years old.