Misplaced Pages

Canada–United States relations: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:20, 25 November 2009 editMiesianiacal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,041 edits Undid revision 327775077 by 174.7.14.105 (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:03, 15 January 2025 edit undoVolatileAnomaly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,236 edits Reverting edit(s) by 108.180.185.84 (talk) to rev. 1269334762 by 2607:FEA8:6968:1100:F023:31D2:D62D:D669: Vandalism (UV 0.1.6)Tags: Ultraviolet Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{POV|date=July 2009}} {{Use mdy dates|date=December 2022}}
{{Infobox Bilateral relations|Canada–United States|Canada|USA}} {{Infobox bilateral relations
| Canada–United States
| Canada|USA|filetype=svg
| mission1 = ]
] ] (right) and ] ] meet in ] in February 2009]]
| mission2 = ]
| envoytitle1 = ]
| envoy1 = ]|envoytitle2 =]
| envoy2 = ]
}}


Canada's long and complex relationship with the United States has had a significant impact on ], ], and ], heritage.<ref>
'''Relations between Canada and the United States''' span more than two centuries, sharing ], conflict during the early years of the ], and the eventual development of one of the most successful international relationships in the modern world. Each is the other's chief economic partner, and indeed the two economies have increasingly merged since the ] (NAFTA) of 1994. In addition, there has always been large scale immigration between the two nations, and since 1900 large-scale tourism as well.
*{{cite journal | last=Mckenna | first=Peter | title=Canada, the United States, and the Organization of American States | journal=American Review of Canadian Studies | volume=29 | issue=3 | date=1999 | issn=0272-2011 | doi=10.1080/02722019909481638 | pages=473–493|quote=this important and complex relationship,}}
*{{cite web | title=Reconcilable Differences: A History of Canada-US Relations | website=Oxford University Press | url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/reconcilable-differences-a-history-of-canada-us-relations-9780195447071?cc=us&lang=en& |quote=Reconcilable Differences provides students with a contemporary look at the often complex relationship between Canada and the United States from 1763 to today, using the most recent scholarship available.}}
*{{cite web | title=Canada and the United States | website=The Canadian Encyclopedia | date=June 11, 2020 | url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canada-and-the-united-states | quote="The Americans are our best friends whether we like it or not." This statement, uttered in the House of Commons by Robert Thompson, the leader of the Social Credit Party early in the 1960s, perhaps best captures the essence of Canada's complex relationship with its nearest neighbor.}}
*{{cite web | last1=Shull | first1=Aaron | last2=Tandt | first2=Michael Den | title=Is US President Joe Biden Good or Bad for Canada? | website=Centre for International Governance Innovation | date=December 13, 2021 | url=https://www.cigionline.org/articles/is-us-president-joe-biden-good-or-bad-for-canada/ | quote=Canadians have a complex relationship with the United States. }}
*{{cite web | title=Dispute Resolution in the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement: One Element of a Complex Relationship | website=McGill Law Journal | date=September 18, 2018 | url=https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/article/dispute-resolution-in-the-canada-united-states-free-trade-agreement-one-element-of-a-complex-relationship/}}
*{{cite web | last=Hale | first=Geoffrey | title=So Near Yet So Far | publisher=UBC Press | date=November 1, 2012 | url=https://www.ubcpress.ca/so-near-yet-so-far | quote=How do politicians, diplomats, and interest groups negotiate the tangled web of Canada–US relations? So Near Yet So Far provides an in-depth look at the multiple dimensions of this complex relationship..}}
*{{cite web | title=A Canadian Agenda for the USA: Obama and Beyond | website=Canadian Global Affairs Institute | date=August 1, 2018 | url=https://www.cgai.ca/a_canadian_agenda_for_the_usa | quote=Complex and Complicated but Mutually-Beneficial Relationship Ours is a very complex relationship building, as John F. Kennedy remarked, on ties of history, geography, economics, security, and deep people-to-people relationships.}}
*{{cite web | title="The U.S. Studies Program at The University of British Columbia will significantly increase our understanding of the United States and its institutions and policies through critical research, teaching, and public outreach, making a tremendous contribution to Canada's complex relationship with the U.S."| website=usstudies | date=January 16, 2013 | url=https://usstudies.arts.ubc.ca/}}</ref> The two countries consider themselves among the "closest allies".<ref>
*{{Cite web |last=Canada |first=Global Affairs |date=2022-11-24 |title=Canada's Indo-Pacific Strategy |url=https://www.international.gc.ca/transparency-transparence/indo-pacific-indo-pacifique/index.aspx?lang=eng |access-date=2023-10-21 |website=GAC}}
*{{Cite web |last=House |first=The White |date=2021-02-24 |title=Remarks by President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada in Joint Press Statements |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/23/remarks-by-president-biden-and-prime-minister-trudeau-of-canada-in-joint-press-statements/ |access-date=2023-10-21 |website=The White House |language=en-US}}</ref> They share the longest ] ({{convert|8,891|km|mi|0|abbr=on}}) between any two nations in the world,<ref>{{cite news|title=The Canada–U.S. border: by the numbers|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/the-canada-u-s-border-by-the-numbers-1.999207|website=cbc.ca|publisher=CBC/Radio-Canada|access-date=March 23, 2016|date=December 7, 2011}}
*{{cite web|url=http://thelongestlistofthelongeststuffatthelongestdomainnameatlonglast.com/long263.html|title=The world's longest border|access-date=April 1, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150704012434/http://thelongestlistofthelongeststuffatthelongestdomainnameatlonglast.com/long263.html|archive-date=July 4, 2015|url-status=usurped}}</ref> and also have significant military interoperability.<ref name="cbc.ca">{{cite web|last=Cudmore|first=James|title=Canadian military explored plan to fully integrate forces with U.S. – Politics – CBC News|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-military-integration-canada-us-1.3248594|access-date=January 4, 2017|publisher=Cbc.ca}}</ref> Both Americans and Canadians have generally ranked each other as one of their respective "favorite nations".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Poushter |first=Jacob |date=2015-10-06 |title=Canadians Satisfied with U.S. Relationship |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/10/06/canadians-satisfied-with-u-s-relationship/ |access-date=2023-10-21 |website=Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Brenan |first=Megan |date=2023-03-21 |title=Canada, Britain Favored Most in U.S.; Russia, N. Korea Least |url=https://news.gallup.com/poll/472421/canada-britain-favored-russia-korea-least.aspx |access-date=2023-10-21 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>


The economies and supply chains of both countries are fully integrated.<ref name="h641">{{cite web | title=State of Trade 2024: Supply chains | website=GAC | date=August 28, 2023 | url=https://www.international.gc.ca/transparency-transparence/state-trade-commerce-international/2024.aspx?lang=eng | access-date=December 18, 2024}}</ref> Every day, around 400,000 people and $2.7 billion in goods and services cross the Canada-U. S. border.<ref name="u596">{{cite web | title=Canada-United States relations | website=GAC | date=March 28, 2019 | url=https://www.international.gc.ca/country-pays/us-eu/relations.aspx?lang=eng | access-date=December 18, 2024}}</ref> The close economic partnership has been facilitated by shared values and strong bilateral trade agreements.<ref name="u59i6">{{cite web | title=Canada-United States relations | website=GAC | date=2019-03-28 | url=https://www.international.gc.ca/country-pays/us-eu/relations.aspx?lang=eng | access-date=2024-12-20}}</ref> The ] (NAFTA) and its successor, the ] (USMCA), have played a pivotal role in fostering economic cooperation and integration between the two nations. Cross-border projects, such as communications, highways, bridges, and pipelines have led to shared energy networks and transportation systems.<ref name="t503">{{cite web | title=U.S. Relations With Canada | website=United States Department of State | date=2022-09-30 | url=https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-canada/ | access-date=2024-12-20}}</ref> The countries have established joint inspection agencies, share data and have harmonized regulations on everything from food to manufactured goods.<ref name="z659">{{cite web | title=Canada and the United States | website=The Canadian Encyclopedia | date=2020-06-11 | url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canada-and-the-united-states | access-date=2024-12-20}}</ref> Despite these facts, disputes have included repeated trade disagreements, environmental concerns, Canadian concern for the future of oil exports, the issue of ], the threat of terrorism and illicit drug trade.
The most serious breach in the relationship was the ], which saw an American invasion of then ] and counter invasions from British-Canadian forces. The border was demilitarized after the war and, apart from minor raids, has remained peaceful. Military collaboration began during the ] and continued throughout the Cold War, though with ] doubts about certain American policies. A high volume of trade and migration between the United States and Canada has generated closer ties, despite continued Canadian fears of being overwhelmed by its neighbor, which is ten times larger in terms of population and economy. James Tagg reports that Canadian university students have a profound fear that "], and likely Canadian sovereignty, will be overwhelmed."<ref>Tagg, "'And, We Burned down the White House, Too': American History, Canadian Undergraduates, and Nationalism," ''The History Teacher,'' Vol. 37, No. 3 (May, 2004), pp. 309-334 ; J. L. Granatstein. ''Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism'' (1997)</ref>


] during ] and ] throughout the ], bilaterally through ] and multilaterally through ]. However, Canada has long been reluctant to participate in US military operations that are not sanctioned by the United Nations,<ref>{{multiref2
Canada and the United States are currently the world's largest trading partners,<ref> See </ref>, share ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thelongestlistofthelongeststuffatthelongestdomainnameatlonglast.com/long263.html|title=The world's longest border|accessdate=2008-04-01}}</ref> and have significant interoperability within the defense sphere. Recent difficulties have included repeated trade disputes (despite ]), environmental concerns, Canadian concern for the future of ] exports, and issues of illegal immigration and the threat of ]. The foreign policies of the neighbors have been closely aligned for the ] and after, though Canada has disagreed with American policies regarding the ], the ], the ], and the ]. A minor ] debate is whether the ] is in ] or under Canadian jurisdiction.
| {{cite book |last1=Mingst |first1=K. |last2=Karns |first2=M.P. |title=The United Nations In The Post-cold War Era, Second Edition |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2019 |isbn=978-1-000-30674-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kk2fDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT63 |page=63}}
| {{cite journal |last=Massie |first=Justin |title=Why Canada Goes to War: Explaining Combat Participation in US-led Coalitions |journal=Canadian Journal of Political Science |publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) |volume=52 |issue=3 |date=April 30, 2019 |doi=10.1017/s0008423919000040 |pages=575–594}}
}}</ref> such as the ] or the ].<ref name="Massie 2019 pp. 575–594">{{cite journal |last=Massie |first=Justin |title=Why Canada Goes to War: Explaining Combat Participation in US-led Coalitions |journal=Canadian Journal of Political Science |publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) |volume=52 |issue=3 |date=2019-04-30 |issn=0008-4239 |doi=10.1017/s0008423919000040 |pages=575–594}}</ref> ] is a distinguishing feature that Canadians feel sets their military foreign policy apart from the United States.<ref name="Gutiérrez-Haces 2018 s015">{{cite book | last=Gutiérrez-Haces | first=Maria Teresa | title=Identity and Otherness in Canadian Foreign Policy | series=Collection internationale d'Études canadiennes &#124; International Canadian Studies Series | date=Nov 6, 2018 | pages=231–250 | publisher=University of Ottawa Press | isbn=978-0-7766-2722-9 | url=https://books.openedition.org/uop/1488?lang=en}}</ref><ref name="Carroll 2016 pp. 167–176">{{cite journal | last=Carroll | first=Michael K | title=Peacekeeping: Canada's past, but not its present and future? | journal=International Journal | publisher= | volume=71 | issue=1 | year=2016 | issn=0020-7020 | jstor=44631172 | pages=167–176 | doi=10.1177/0020702015619857 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/44631172 |access-date=February 28, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Anon. u211">{{cite web |title= Canada's Current Role in World| url=https://www.environicsinstitute.org/docs/default-source/project-documents/canada-s-world-survey/canada's-current-role-in-world.pdf?sfvrsn=d5590018_4 |publisher=Environics Institute for Survey Research}}</ref>


] has manifested itself in a variety of ways, ranging from political,<ref name="Doran Sewell 1988 pp. 105–119">{{cite journal | last1=Doran | first1=Charles F. | last2=Sewell | first2=James Patrick | title=Anti-Americanism in Canada? | journal=The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science | publisher= | volume=497 | year=1988 | issn=0002-7162 | jstor=1045764 | pages=105–119 | doi=10.1177/0002716288497001009 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1045764}}</ref> to cultural.<ref name="Anon. x583">{{cite web | title=Anti-Americanism in Canada," in Brendon O'Connor, ed., Anti-Americanism: History, Causes, and Themes| volume=3 | url=https://nossalk.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/nossal_2007_anti-americanism-oconnor.pdf | publisher =Oxford/Westport: Greenwood World Publishing}|pages=59, 76|year=2007|author=]}}</ref> Starting with the ], when ] were resettled in Canada, a vocal element in Canada has warned against American dominance or ]. The ] saw invasions across the border in both directions, but the war ended with unchanged borders.<ref>{{Cite web |title=War of 1812 |url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/war-of-1812 |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca |language=en}}</ref> The British ceased aiding Native American attacks on the United States, and the United States never again attempted to invade Canada. Apart from minor unsuccessful raids, it has remained peaceful.<ref>John Herd Thompson, ''Canada and the United States: ambivalent allies'' (2008).</ref> As Britain decided to disengage, fears of an American takeover played a role in the ] (1867), and Canada's ] (1911).
Canada remains Americans' favorite foreign nation<ref></ref> and the U.S. is high on the Canadian international agenda. An undercurrent of anti-American sentiment is fueled by Canadian fears of American cultural hegemony and the weakening of a distinctive Canadian culture.<ref>James Tagg. "'And, We Burned down the White House, Too': American History, Canadian Undergraduates, and Nationalism," ''The History Teacher,'' Vol. 37, No. 3 (May, 2004), pp.&nbsp;309–334</ref>


==Country comparison== == History ==
=== Colonial wars ===
{| class="wikitable"
{{Main|French and Indian Wars}}
|-
].]]
!
Before the ] in 1760, there had been a series of wars between the British and the French that were fought out in the colonies as well as in Europe and the high seas. In general, the British heavily relied on ] units, while the French heavily relied on their ] allies. The ] were important British allies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Thomas Morgan |first1=William |year=1926 |title=The Five Nations and Queen Anne |journal=Mississippi Valley Historical Review |volume=13 |issue=2|pages=169–189 |doi=10.2307/1891955 |jstor=1891955}}</ref> Much of the fighting involved ambushes and small-scale warfare in the villages along the border between New England and Quebec. The New England colonies had a much larger population than Quebec, so major invasions came from south to north. The First Nation allies, only loosely controlled by the French, repeatedly raided New England villages to kidnap women and children, and torture and kill the men.<ref>June Namias, ''White Captives: Gender and Ethnicity on the American Frontier'' (1993)</ref> Those who survived were brought up as Francophone Catholics. The tension along the border was exacerbated by religion, the French Catholics and English Protestants had a deep mutual distrust.<ref>Howard H. Peckham, ''The Colonial Wars'' (1965)</ref> There was a naval dimension as well, involving ]s attacking enemy merchant ships.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chard |first1=Donald F. |year=1975 |title=The Impact of French Privateering on New England, 1689–1713 |journal=American Neptune |volume=35 |issue=3|pages=153–165}}</ref>
! {{flagicon|Canada}} '''Canada'''
! {{flagicon|USA}} '''United States'''
|-
| '''Population'''
| 33,813,000
| 307,721,000
|-
| '''Area'''
| 9,984,670&nbsp;km<sup>2</sup> (3,854,085 sq mi)
| 9,629,091&nbsp;km<sup>2</sup> (3,717,813sq mi)
|-
| '''Population Density'''
| 3.2/km<sup>2</sup> (8.3/sq mi)
| 31/km<sup>2</sup> (80/sq mi)
|-
| '''Capital'''
| ]
| ]
|-
| '''Largest City'''
| ] – 2,503,281 (5,555,912 Metro)
| ] – 8,363,710 (19,006,798 Metro)
|-
| '''Government'''
| ] ] ]
| ] ] ]
|-
| '''Official languages'''
| ] and ]
| English (de facto)
|-
| '''Main religions'''
| 77% ], 16.2% ] or unstated, 2% ], 1.1% ],
1% ]
|75% Christianity, 20% non-Religious, 2% Judaism, 1% ], 1% ]
|-
| '''Ethnic groups'''
| 75.3% ]/], 5.5% ], 4.6% ], 4.3% ],
3.3% ], 3.2% ]/], 2.5% ], 0.3% ]
| 74% ], 14.8% ] (of any race), 13.4% ], </br> 6.5% ], 4.4% ], 2.0% ], </br> 0.68% ], 0.14% ]
|-
| '''GDP (nominal)'''
| ''2008 IMF estimates'': ]1.499 ]<ref name="imf2">{{cite web|title=World Economic Outlook Database|publisher=International Monetary Fund|url=http://imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2008&ey=2008&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C941%2C914%2C446%2C612%2C666%2C614%2C668%2C311%2C672%2C213%2C946%2C911%2C137%2C193%2C962%2C122%2C674%2C912%2C676%2C313%2C548%2C419%2C556%2C513%2C678%2C316%2C181%2C913%2C682%2C124%2C684%2C339%2C273%2C638%2C921%2C514%2C948%2C218%2C943%2C963%2C686%2C616%2C688%2C223%2C518%2C516%2C728%2C918%2C558%2C748%2C138%2C618%2C196%2C522%2C278%2C622%2C692%2C156%2C694%2C624%2C142%2C626%2C449%2C628%2C564%2C228%2C283%2C924%2C853%2C233%2C288%2C632%2C293%2C636%2C566%2C634%2C964%2C238%2C182%2C662%2C453%2C960%2C968%2C423%2C922%2C935%2C714%2C128%2C862%2C611%2C716%2C321%2C456%2C243%2C722%2C248%2C942%2C469%2C718%2C253%2C724%2C642%2C576%2C643%2C936%2C939%2C961%2C644%2C813%2C819%2C199%2C172%2C184%2C132%2C524%2C646%2C361%2C648%2C362%2C915%2C364%2C134%2C732%2C652%2C366%2C174%2C734%2C328%2C144%2C258%2C146%2C656%2C463%2C654%2C528%2C336%2C923%2C263%2C738%2C268%2C578%2C532%2C537%2C944%2C742%2C176%2C866%2C534%2C369%2C536%2C744%2C429%2C186%2C433%2C925%2C178%2C746%2C436%2C926%2C136%2C466%2C343%2C112%2C158%2C111%2C439%2C298%2C916%2C927%2C664%2C846%2C826%2C299%2C542%2C582%2C443%2C474%2C917%2C754%2C544%2C698&s=NGDPD&grp=0&a=&pr.x=35&pr.y=9}}</ref> ($45,085 ]) <ref name="imf2"/>
| ''2008 IMF estimates'': US$14.441 trillion<ref name="imf2"/> ($47,440 per capita) <ref>{{cite web|title=World Economic Outlook Database|publisher=International Monetary Fund|url=http://imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=26&pr.y=9&sy=2008&ey=2008&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C941%2C914%2C446%2C612%2C666%2C614%2C668%2C311%2C672%2C213%2C946%2C911%2C137%2C193%2C962%2C122%2C674%2C912%2C676%2C313%2C548%2C419%2C556%2C513%2C678%2C316%2C181%2C913%2C682%2C124%2C684%2C339%2C273%2C638%2C921%2C514%2C948%2C218%2C943%2C963%2C686%2C616%2C688%2C223%2C518%2C516%2C728%2C918%2C558%2C748%2C138%2C618%2C196%2C522%2C278%2C622%2C692%2C156%2C694%2C624%2C142%2C626%2C449%2C628%2C564%2C228%2C283%2C924%2C853%2C233%2C288%2C632%2C293%2C636%2C566%2C634%2C964%2C238%2C182%2C662%2C453%2C960%2C968%2C423%2C922%2C935%2C714%2C128%2C862%2C611%2C716%2C321%2C456%2C243%2C722%2C248%2C942%2C469%2C718%2C253%2C724%2C642%2C576%2C643%2C936%2C939%2C961%2C644%2C813%2C819%2C199%2C172%2C184%2C132%2C524%2C646%2C361%2C648%2C362%2C915%2C364%2C134%2C732%2C652%2C366%2C174%2C734%2C328%2C144%2C258%2C146%2C656%2C463%2C654%2C528%2C336%2C923%2C263%2C738%2C268%2C578%2C532%2C537%2C944%2C742%2C176%2C866%2C534%2C369%2C536%2C744%2C429%2C186%2C433%2C925%2C178%2C746%2C436%2C926%2C136%2C466%2C343%2C112%2C158%2C111%2C439%2C298%2C916%2C927%2C664%2C846%2C826%2C299%2C542%2C582%2C443%2C474%2C917%2C754%2C544%2C698&s=NGDPDPC&grp=0&a=}}</ref>
|-
| '''Military expenditures'''
| $18.28 billion (FY 2009-10) <ref></ref><ref></ref>
| $663.7 billion (FY 2010) <ref>http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/budget/defense.pdf</ref>
|}


England seized Quebec from 1629 to 1632, and Acadia in 1613 and again from 1654 to 1670; These territories were returned to France by the peace treaties. The major wars were (to use American names), ] (1689–1697); ] (1702–1713); ] (1744–1748), and from 1755 to 1763 the ] (known in Europe as the ]).
==History==
===Mingling of peoples===
From the 1750s to the 21st century, there has been extensive mingling of the Canadian and American populations, with large movements in both directions.


New England soldiers and sailors were critical to the successful British campaign to capture the French fortress of Louisbourg in 1745,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shortt |first1=S. E. D. |year=1972 |title=Conflict and Identity in Massachusetts: The Louisbourg Expedition of 1745 |journal=Social History/Histoire Sociale |volume=5 |issue=10|pages=165–185}}</ref> and (after it had been returned by treaty) to capture it again in 1758.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Johnston |first1=A. J. B. |year=2008 |title=D-Day at Louisbourg |journal=Beaver |volume=88 |issue=3|pages=16–23 }}</ref>
New England Yankees settled large parts of ] before 1775, and were neutral during the ]. At the end of the Revolution, about 75,000 Loyalists moved out of the new United States to Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and the lands of Quebec west and south of Montreal. From 1790 to 1812 many farmers moved from New York and New England into Ontario. In the early 20th century, the opening of the Prairie Provinces attracted many farmers from the American Midwest. Two distinctive groups were "Pennsylvania Dutch" Mennonites, and Mormons who went from Utah to form communities in Alberta after the Mormon Church rejected plural marriage in the 1890s.<ref> Marcus Lee Hansen, ''The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical'' (1940); David D. Harvey, ''Americans in Canada: Migration and Settlement since 1840'' (1991)</ref>. The 1960s saw the arrival of about 50,000 draft-dodgers who opposed the ].<ref> Renee Kasinsky, "Refugees from Militarism: Draft Age Americans in Canada'' (1976)</ref>


=== American Revolutionary War ===
In the late 19th and early 20th century about 900,000 French Canadians moved to the U.S., with 395,000 residents there in 1900. Two-thirds went to mill towns in New England, where they formed distinctive ethnic communities. By the late 20th century they had dispersed more widely, and abandoned the French language, but most kept the Catholic religion<ref> Yves Roby, ''The Franco-Americans of New England'' (2004); Elliott Robert Barkan, "French Canadians" in Stephan Thernstrom, ed. ''Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups'' (1980) pp 389-401</ref>. About twice as many English Canadians came to the U.S., but they did not form distinctive ethnic settlements.<ref> Alan A. Brookes, "Canadians, British" in Stephan Thernstrom, ed. ''Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups'' (1980) pp 191ff.</ref>
{{Main|American Revolutionary War}}
] flag, that is very similar to the Union Jack, was used by immigrants who remained ]. In present-day Canada, the United Empire Loyalist flag continues to be used as symbol of pride and heritage for loyalist townships and organizations.<ref name="s891">{{cite web | title=The Loyalist Flag | website=UELAC | date=2021-12-06 | url=https://uelac.ca/monuments/loyalist-flag/ | access-date=2024-12-26}}</ref>]]
At the outset of the ], the ] hoped the ] in Quebec and the Colonists in ] would join their rebellion. They were pre-approved for joining the United States in the ].
When ], thousands joined the American cause and formed regiments that fought during the war; however, most remained neutral and some joined the British effort. Britain advised the French Canadians that the British Empire already enshrined their rights in the ], which the American colonies had viewed as one of the ]. The American invasion was a fiasco and Britain tightened its grip on its northern possessions; in 1777, a major British invasion into New York led to the surrender of the entire British army at Saratoga and led France to enter the war as an ally of the U.S. The French Canadians largely ignored France's appeals for solidarity.<ref>Mason Wade, ''The French Canadians, 1760–1945'' (1955) p. 74.</ref>


The American forces had much better success in ], owing to the leadership of ] leader ]. In 1778, 200 men under Clark, supplied and supported mainly by Virginia, came down the ] near ], marched across southern Illinois, and then captured ] without loss of life. From there, part of his men took ], but was soon lost to British Lieutenant Colonel ], the commander at ]. Clark later retook it in the ] in February 1779. Roughly half of Clark's militia in the theater were Canadian volunteers sympathetic to the American cause.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1797&context=facsch_papers#page=4|title="The Old Northwest Under British Control, 1763–1783" and "Indiana A Part of the Old Northwest, 1783–1800"|author=George W. Geib|date=1987 |pages=42–44|publisher=]}}</ref>
Canada was a way-station through which immigrants from other lands stopped for a while while ultimately heading to the U.S. In 1851-1951, 7.1 million people arrived in Canada (mostly from Europe), and 6.6 million left Canada, mostly to the U.S.<ref> Stephan Thernstrom, ed. ''Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups'' (1980) p 392.</ref>


In the end, America won its independence and the ] compelled Britain to cede ] to them. Following America's independence, Canada became a refuge for about an estimated 70,000 or 15% of ] who either wanted to leave the U.S. or were compelled by Patriot reprisals to do so. Among the original Loyalists, there were 3,500 free ]. Most went to Nova Scotia and in 1792, 1,200 migrated to ]. About 2,000 black slaves were brought in by Loyalist owners; they remained slaves in Canada until the Empire abolished slavery in 1833. Around 85% of the loyalists remained in the new United States and became American citizens.<ref>Thomas B. Allen, ''Tories: Fighting for the King in America's First Civil War'' (2011) p. xviii</ref>
===American Revolution===
]
At the outset of the ], the ] hoped the ] in Quebec and the Colonists in ] would join their rebellion and they were pre-approved for joining the United States in the ]. When ] during the ], thousands joined the American cause and formed regiments that fought during the war; however most remained neutral and some joined the British effort. The British advised the French Canadians that the British Empire already enshrined their rights in the ], which the American colonies had viewed as one of the ]. The American invasion was a fiasco and Britain tightened its grip on its northern possessions; in 1777 a major British invasion into New York led to the surrender of the entire British army at Saratoga, and led France to enter the war as an ally of the U.S. The French Canadians largely ignored France's appeals for solidarity.<ref> Mason Wade, ''The French Canadians, 1760-1945'' (1955) p. 74.</ref> After the war Canada became a refuge for about 75,000 ] who wanted to leave the U.S. Among the original Loyalists, who were of many ethnic backgrounds, there were 3500 free blacks. Most went to Nova Scotia and in 1792, 1200 migrated to ]. About 2000 black slaves were brought in by Loyalist owners; they remained slaves in Canada until the Empire abolished slavery in 1833. Before 1860, about 30,000-40,000 escaped slaves used the ] to escape to British North America.<ref>Patrick Bode, "Upper Canada, 1793: Simcoe and the Slaves," ''Beaver'' 1993 73(3): 17-19; Paul Robert Magocsi, ed. ''Enyclopedia of Canada's peoples'' (1999) p 142-3</ref>


===War of 1812=== === War of 1812 (1812-1815) ===
{{main|War of 1812}}
], which ended the war, called for the British to vacate all their forts south of the ] border. The British refused to do so, citing failure of the United States to provide financial restitution for Loyalists who had lost property in the war. The ] in 1795 with Great Britain resolved that lingering issue and the British departed the forts. ] saw the nearby British imperial presence as a threat to ], and so he opposed the ], and it became one of the major political issues in the United States at the time.
The ] of 1783, which ended the ], called for British forces to vacate all their forts south of the ] border. Britain refused to do so, citing the failure of the newly-independent ] to provide financial restitution for Loyalists who had lost property in the war. The ] in 1795 with Great Britain resolved that lingering issue and the British departed the forts. ] saw the nearby British presence as a threat to the ], and so he opposed the ], and it became one of the major political issues in the United States at the time.<ref>Bradford Perkins, ''The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805'' (1955)</ref> Thousands of Americans immigrated to Upper Canada (Ontario) from 1785 to 1812 to obtain cheaper land and better tax rates prevalent in that province; despite expectations that they would be loyal to the U.S. if a war broke out, in the event they were largely non-political.<ref>{{cite book|first=George A.|last=Rawlyk|title=The Canada Fire: Radical Evangelicalism in British North America, 1775–1812|url=https://archive.org/details/canadafire0000unse|url-access=registration|year=1994|publisher=McGill-Queen's Press|page=|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780773512214}}</ref>
{{multiple image
| align = left
| direction = horizontal
| image1 = 1812 War Declaration.jpg
| width1 = 159
| footer = The United States Declaration of War against the British (left) and Governor ]'s proclamation issued in response to it in the ] (right)
| image2 = Proclamation Province of Upper Canada by Isaac Brock.jpg
| width2 = 140
}}
Tensions mounted again after 1805, erupting into the ] (1812-1815), when the ], approved / signed by the fourth ] ] (17xx-1836, served 1809-1817), declared war in June 1812 on Britain. The Americans were angered by British harassment of U.S. ships on the high seas and ], severe restrictions against neutral American trade with ], and British support for hostile ] tribes in ] and territories the U.S. had gained in 1783. American "honor" was an implicit issue. While the Americans could not hope to defeat the ] and control the seas, they could call on an army much larger than the British garrison in Canada, and so a land invasion of Canada was proposed as the most advantageous means of attacking the British Empire. Americans on the western frontier also hoped an invasion would bring an end to British support of ] resistance to ], typified by ]'s coalition of tribes.<ref>Alan Taylor, ''The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies'' (2010).</ref> Americans may also have wanted to acquire Canada.{{sfn|Stagg|2012|pp=5–6}}<ref>George F. G. Stanley, 1983, p. 32 {{full citation needed|date=July 2013}}</ref><ref>David Heidler, Jeanne T. Heidler, The War of 1812, pg4 {{full citation needed|date=June 2013}} <!--needs a date--></ref>{{sfn|Tucker|2011|p=236}}{{sfn|Nugent|2008|p=, 75}}


Once war broke out, the American strategy was to seize Canada. There was some hope that settlers in western Canada—most of them recent immigrants from the U.S.—would welcome the chance to overthrow their British rulers. However, the American invasions were defeated primarily by British regulars with support from Native Americans and ] militia. Aided by the large Royal Navy, a series of British raids on the American coast were highly successful, culminating with an ] that resulted in the British burning of the ], ], and other public buildings. At the end of the war, Britain's American Indian allies had largely been defeated, and the Americans controlled a strip of Western Ontario centered on ]. However, Britain held much of ], and, with the support of their remaining American Indian allies, huge areas of the Old Northwest, including ] and much of ] and ]. With the surrender of Napoleon in 1814, Britain ended naval policies that angered Americans; with the defeat of the Indian tribes, the threat to American expansion was ended. The upshot was both the United States and Canada asserted their sovereignty, Canada remained under British rule, and London and Washington had nothing more to fight over. The war was ended by the ], which took effect in February 1815.<ref>Mark Zuehlke, ''For Honour's Sake: The War of 1812 and the Brokering of an Uneasy Peace'' (2007) is a ] perspective.</ref> A series of postwar agreements further stabilized peaceful relations along the Canada–US border. Canada reduced American immigration for fear of undue American influence and built up the ] as a counterweight to the largely American ] and ] churches.<ref>W.L. Morton, ''The Kingdom of Canada'' (1969) ch 12</ref>
Tensions mounted again after 1805, erupting into the ], when the Americans declared war on Britain. The Americans were angered by British harassment of U.S. ships on the high seas and seizure ("]") of 6,000 sailors from American ships, severe restrictions against neutral American trade with France, and British support for hostile Indian tribes in Ohio and territories the U.S. had gained in 1783. American "honor" was an implicit issue. The Americans were outgunned by more than 10 to 1 by the ], and so a land invasion of Canada was proposed as the only feasible means of attacking the British Empire. Americans on the western frontier also hoped an invasion would bring an end to British support of ] resistance to the ], typified by ]'s coalition of tribes. The U.S. strategy in 1812 was to temporarily seize Canada as a means of forcing concessions from the British. There was some hope that settlers in western Canada—most of them recent immigrants from the U.S. --would welcome the chance to overthrow their British rulers. However, the American invasions were incompetent and were defeated primarily by British regulars with support from Indians and ] (Ontario) militia. Major British invasions of New York in 1814 and Louisiana in 1814-15 were poorly handled and the British retreated, leaving both sides about where they were in 1812. With the collapse of Napoleon, the British ended naval policies that angered Americans; with the defeat of the Indian tribes that threat to American expansion was ended. The upshot was neither side had anything to fight over, and the war ended by a treaty that took effect in February 1815.


In later years, Anglophone Canadians, especially in Ontario, viewed the War of 1812 as a heroic and successful resistance against invasion and as a victory that defined them as a people. The myth that the Canadian militia had defeated the invasion almost single-handed, known logically as the "militia myth", became highly prevalent after the war,<ref name="Cleves Eustace Gilje Hale 2012 pp. 520–555">{{cite journal | last1=Cleves | first1=Rachel Hope | last2=Eustace | first2=Nicole | last3=Gilje | first3=Paul | last4=Hale | first4=Matthew Rainbow | last5=Morgan | first5=Cecilia | last6=Opal | first6=Jason M. | last7=Peskin | first7=Lawrence A. | last8=Taylor | first8=Alan | title=Interchange: The War of 1812 | journal=The Journal of American History | publisher= | volume=99 | issue=2 | year=2012 | issn=0021-8723| jstor=44306807 | pages=520–555 | doi=10.1093/jahist/jas236 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/44306807 | access-date=Apr 4, 2024}}</ref> having been propounded by ], ].<ref name="Wood 2010 p. ">{{cite book | last=Wood | first=James A. | title=Militia Myths | publisher=UBC Press | publication-place=Vancouver | date=2010 | isbn=978-0-7748-1765-3 | oclc=473375581 |url=https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9466/1/9780774817653.pdf| page=12}}</ref>
In later years, Canadians, who remain loyal to the Empire well into the 20th century, viewed the War of 1812 as a successful resistance against invasion and as a victory that defined them as a people. A common theme in Canadian political rhetoric ever since has been the protection of Canadian culture from American influence and possible integration into the American political, cultural and economic realm.


===Dominion of Canada=== === Post War of 1812 and mid-19th century ===
In the aftermath of the War of 1812, pro-British conservatives led by Anglican Bishop ] took control in Ontario ("Upper Canada") and promoted the Anglican religion as opposed to the more republican Methodist and Baptist churches. A small interlocking elite, known as the ] took full political control. Democracy, as practiced in the United States, was ridiculed. The policies had the desired effect of deterring immigration from the United States. ] in Ontario and Quebec ("Lower Canada") in 1837 were suppressed; many of the leaders fled to the US.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Dunning | first1 = Tom | year = 2009 | title = The Canadian Rebellions of 1837 and 1838 as a Borderland War: A Retrospective | journal = Ontario History | volume = 101 | issue = 2| pages = 129–141 | doi = 10.7202/1065615ar | doi-access = free }}</ref> The American policy was to largely ignore the rebellions,<ref>Orrin Edward Tiffany, ''The Relations of the United States to the Canadian Rebellion of 1837–1838'' (1905). </ref> and indeed ignore Canada generally in favor of the westward expansion of the ].
] and a U.S. State Trooper in 1941]]
Canada became a self-governing dominion in 1867 in internal affairs while Britain controlled diplomacy and defense policy. Prior to Confederation, there was an ] in which the Americans claimed the 54th degree latitude. That issue was resolved by splitting the disputed territory; the northern half became British Columbia, and the southern half the states of Washington and Oregon. Strained relations with America continued, however, due to a series of small-scale armed incursions named the ] by ] ] veterans across the border from 1866 to 1871 in an attempt to trade Canada for Irish independence. The American government, angry at Canadian tolerance of Confederate raiders during the American Civil War, moved very slowly to disarm the Fenians. The British government, in charge of diplomatic relations, protested cautiously, as Anglo-American relations were tense. Much of the tension was relieved as the Fenians faded away and in 1872 by the settlement of the ], when Britain paid the U.S. $15.5 million for war losses caused by warships built in Britain and sold to the Confederacy.


The ] formalized the U.S.–Canada border in Maine, averting the ]. During the ] era, the "]" agenda called for U.S. annexation of what became Western Canada; the U.S. and Britain instead agreed to a boundary of the 49th parallel. As harsher fugitive slave laws were passed, Canada became a destination for slaves escaping on the ].<ref name="Cross 2010 p. ">{{cite book | last=Cross | first=L.D. | title=The Underground Railroad: The long journey to freedom in Canada | publisher=James Lorimer Limited, Publishers | series=Amazing Stories | year=2010 | isbn=978-1-55277-581-3 |page=intro}}</ref><ref name="CBC g717">{{cite web | title=Underground Railroad | website=CBC | url=https://www.cbc.ca/history/EPCONTENTSE1EP8CH1PA3LE.html#:~:text=In%20all%2030%2C000%20slaves%20fled,white%20sympathizers%20who%20helped%20runaways.&text=Canada%20was%20viewed%20as%20a,black%20person%20could%20be%20free. | access-date=Apr 4, 2024}}</ref>
Disputes over ocean boundaries on ] and over fishing, whaling, and sealing rights in the Pacific were settled by international arbitration, setting an important precedent.


=== American Civil War ===
Much more controversial was the ], settled in favor of the United States in 1903. At issue was the exact boundary between Alaska and Canada, specifically whether Canada would have a port near the present American town of ] that would give access to the new Yukon goldfields. The dispute was settled by arbitration, and the British delegate voted with the Americans—to the astonishment and anti-British disgust of Canadians who suddenly realized that Britain considered its relations with the United States paramount to those with Canada.<ref>John A. Munro, "English-Canadianism and the Demand for Canadian Autonomy: Ontario's Response to the Alaska Boundary Decision, 1903." ''Ontario History'' 1965 57(4): 189-203. Issn: 0030-2953</ref>
{{Main|Canada in the American Civil War}}
]. The Confederate soldiers launched their raid from the ].]]
The British Empire was neutral during the ]. About 40,000 Canadians volunteered for the ]—many already lived in the U.S., and a few for the ].<ref>Robin W. Winks, "The Creation of a Myth: 'Canadian' Enlistments in the Northern Armies during the American Civil War", ''Canadian Historical Review'', 1958 39(1): 24–40.</ref> However, hundreds of Americans who were called up in the draft fled to Canada.<ref>Adam Mayers, '' Dixie & the Dominion: Canada, the Confederacy, and the War for the Union'' (2003)</ref>


Several events caused strained relations between the British Empire and the United States, over the former's unofficial role in supporting the ]. ] came from Great Britain and made use of Canadian ports in ] to break through the ] to deliver the weaponry to the Confederacy in exchange for cotton. Attacks were made on American merchant shipping by British-built Confederate warships such as ].<ref name="DWAD">{{cite web|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/alabama-claims.htm|title=Alabama Claims, 1862–1872|website=]}}</ref> On December 7, 1863, pro-Confederate Canadian sympathizers ] off the coast of ], ] then used the steamer, originally intended as a ], to flee back to the Maritimes where they were later able to escape justice for ] and ]. ] agents also used Canada as a base to attack American border towns, such as ], where they killed an American citizen, robbed three banks of over US$200,000, then escaped to Canada where they were arrested but then released by a Canadian court to widespread American anger. Many Americans falsely suspected that the Canadian government knew of the raid ahead of time.<ref>Mayers, ''Dixie & the Dominion'' pp 105–116.</ref> American Secretary of State ] let the British government know that "it is impossible to consider those proceedings as either legal, just or friendly towards the United States."<ref>{{cite book|title=Congressional series of United States public documents|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oEtHAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA71|year=1870|publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office|page=71}}</ref>
1907 saw a minor controversy over ] sailing into the Great Lakes via Canada without Canadian permission. Partly in response, in 1909 the two sides signed the ] and the ] was established to manage the Great Lakes.


==== Alabama claims ====
Economic ties and migration had deepened by this era, but were not equal. In 1901 there were 128,000 American-born residents in Canada (3.5% of the Canadian population) and 1.18 million Canadian-born residents in the United States (1.6% of the U.S. population).<ref> J. Castell Hopkins, ''The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs: 1902'' (1903), p. 327.</ref>
{{Main|Alabama Claims}}
Americans were angry at Britain's perceived support for the Confederacy during the American Civil War. Some leaders demanded a huge payment, on the premise that British involvement had lengthened the war by two years,<ref name="DWAD"/> a claim confirmed by post-Civil War historians and scholars.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/historians-reveal-secrets-of-uk-gunrunning-which-lengthened-the-american-civil-war-by-two-years-9557937.html|title=Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years|author=David Keys|date=24 June 2014|work=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Confederate Blockade Runners|url=https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1933/april/confederate-blockade-runners|author=Paul Hendren|date=April 1933|publisher=]}}</ref> Senator ], the chairman of the ], originally wanted to ask for $2 billion in ], or alternatively the ceding of all of Canada to the United States.<ref>{{cite book|first=Jay|last=Sexton|title=Debtor Diplomacy: Finance and American Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era, 1837–1873|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TuepT3C0TCsC&pg=PA206|year=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=206|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780199281039}}</ref><ref>Theodore C. Blegen, "A Plan for the Union of British North America and the United States, 1866". ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review'' 4.4 (1918): 470–483 .</ref>


When American Secretary of State ] negotiated the ] with Russia in 1867, he intended it as the first step in a comprehensive plan to gain control of the entire ] Coast. Seward was a firm believer in ], primarily for its commercial advantages to the U.S. Seward expected ] to seek annexation to the U.S. and thought Britain might accept this in exchange for the ''Alabama'' claims. Soon other elements endorsed annexation, they planned to annex ], ] (Manitoba), and ], in exchange for dropping the damage claims. The idea peaked in the spring and summer of 1870, with American expansionists, Canadian separatists, and pro-American Englishmen seemingly combining forces. The plan was dropped for multiple reasons. London continued to stall, American commercial and financial groups pressed Washington for a quick settlement of the dispute on a cash basis, growing Canadian nationalist sentiment in British Columbia called for staying inside the British Empire, Congress became preoccupied with ], and most Americans showed little interest in territorial expansion.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}
===Canadian autonomy===
Canada demanded and received permission to send its own delegation to the ] in 1919, with the proviso that it sign the treaty under the British Empire. Canada subsequently took responsibility for its own foreign and military affairs in the 1920s. Its first ambassador to the United States, ], was named in 1927. Relations with the United States were cordial, except in the matter of tariffs in the 1930-32 period of the Great Depression.


The "]" dispute went to international arbitration. In one of the first major cases of arbitration, the tribunal in 1872 rejected the American claims for damages relating to the British blockade running but ordered Britain to pay $15.5 million only for damages caused by British-built Confederate ships.<ref name="DWAD"/> Britain paid and the episode ended in peaceful relations.<ref>Doris W. Dashew, "The Story of An Illusion: The Plan To Trade 'Alabama' Claims For Canada", ''Civil War History'', December 1969, Vol. 15 Issue 4, pp 332–348</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shi | first1 = David E. | year = 1978 | title = Seward's Attempt to Annex British Columbia, 1865–1869 | journal = Pacific Historical Review | volume = 47 | issue = 2| pages = 217–238 | doi=10.2307/3637972 | jstor=3637972}}</ref>
In the 1930s, the United States Army War College developed hypothetical war plans for a possible war with Canada; they featured an invasion in ]; it was merely an academic exercise. Similarly, Canada developed ] to counteract an American invasion. Canadian defence was organized against an American invasion until the onset of ].


=== Late 19th century ===
Following co-operation in the two World Wars, Canada and the United States lost much of their previous animosity. As Britain's influence as a global imperial power declined, Canada and the United States became extremely close partners. Canada was a close ally of the United States during the ].
{{Main|Canadian Confederation}}
Canada became a self-governing dominion in 1867 in internal affairs while Britain retained control of diplomacy and defence policy. Before Confederation, there was an ] in which the Americans claimed the 54th degree latitude. The ] of 1846 largely resolved the issue, splitting the disputed territory – the northern half became British Columbia, and the southern half eventually formed the states of ] and ].
] in 1870. The American-based ] launched several raids into Canada in 1866 and 1870–71.]]
Strained relations with America continued, however, due to a series of small-scale armed incursions called the "]" conducted by ] Civil War veterans across the border from 1866 to 1871 in an attempt to trade Canada for Irish independence.<ref>{{cite book |first= Yossi|last= Shain|title= Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8pqj8GFCg7MC&pg=PA53|year= 1999|publisher= Cambridge U.P.|page=53|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780521642255}}</ref> The American government, angry at Canadian tolerance of Confederate raiders during the ] of 1861 to 1865, moved very slowly to disarm the ].<ref>David Sim, "Filibusters, Fenians, and a Contested Neutrality: The Irish Question and US Diplomacy, 1848–1871". ''American Nineteenth Century History'' 12.3 (2011): 265–287.</ref> The ] were small-scale attacks carried out by the ], an ] organization based among Irish Catholics in the United States. Targets included British Army forts, customs posts, and other locations near the border. The raids were small, unsuccessful episodes in 1866, and again from 1870 to 1871. They aimed to bring pressure on Great Britain to withdraw from Ireland. None of these raids achieved their aims and all were quickly defeated by local Canadian forces.<ref>Robert M. Groceman, "Patriot War and the Fenian Raids: Case Studies in Border Security on the US Canada Border in the Nineteenth Century" (US Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth United States, 2017) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201113133904/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1038696.pdf |date=November 13, 2020 }}.</ref>


The British government, in charge of diplomatic relations, protested cautiously, as Anglo-American relations were tense. Much of the tension was relieved as the Fenians faded away and in 1872 by the settlement of the ], when Britain paid the U.S. $15.5 million for war losses caused by warships built in Britain and sold to the Confederacy.
In ], the United States built large military bases in the ] (which did not join Canada until 1949 and was under direct British rule at the time), and the business community there sought closer ties with the United States as expressed by the ]. Ottawa took notice and wanted Newfoundland to join Canada, which it did after hotly contested referenda. There was little demand in the United States for the acquisition of Newfoundland, so the United States did not protest the British decision not to allow an American option on the ].


Disputes over ocean boundaries on ] and fishing, whaling, and sealing rights in the Pacific were settled by international arbitration, setting an important precedent.<ref>
===Nixon Shock 1971===
{{cite book
The United States had become Canada's largest market, and after the war the Canadian economy became dependent on smooth trade flows with the United States so much that in 1971 when the United States enacted the "]" economic policies (including a 10% tariff on all imports) it put the Canadian government into a panic. This led in a large part to the articulation of Prime Minister ]'s "]" policy of diversifying Canada's trade and downgrading the importance of Canada – American relations. In a 1972 speech in Ottawa, Nixon declared the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States dead.<ref> Bruce Muirhead, "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock," ''American Review of Canadian Studies,'' Vol. 34, 2004
|first=Mark|last=Kurlansky|title=Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World|url= https://archive.org/details/cod00mark|url-access= registration|year=1998|publisher=Penguin|page=|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9781440672873}}
</ref> </ref>


=== Early 20th century ===
==Defence and international conflict==
==== Alaska boundary ====
] (NORAD), long headquartered in the ] Operations Center in Colorado, exemplifies military co-operation between Canada and the U.S.]]
{{Main|Alaska boundary dispute}}
The Canadian military, like forces of other NATO countries, fought along side the United States in most major conflicts since ], including the ], the ], the ], and most recently the ]. The main exceptions to this were the Canadian government's opposition to the ] and the ], which caused some brief diplomatic tensions. Despite these issues, military relations have remained close.
]. The border dispute was settled by arbitration in 1903, with the modern boundary marked by a yellow line.]]
A short-lived controversy was the Alaska boundary dispute, settled in favor of the United States in 1903. The issue was unimportant until the ] brought tens of thousands of men to Canada's Yukon, and they had to arrive through American ports. Canada needed its port and claimed that it had a legal right to a port near the present American town of ], Alaska. It would provide an all-Canadian route to the rich goldfields. The dispute was settled by arbitration, and the British delegate voted with the Americans—to the astonishment and disgust of Canadians who suddenly realized that Britain considered its relations with the United States paramount compared to those with Canada. The arbitration validated the status quo, but made Canada angry at London.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Munro | first1 = John A. | year = 1965 | title = English-Canadianism and the Demand for Canadian Autonomy: Ontario's Response to the Alaska Boundary Decision, 1903 | journal = Ontario History | volume = 57 | issue = 4| pages = 189–203 }}</ref><ref>David G. Haglund, and Tudor Onea. "Victory without Triumph: Theodore Roosevelt, Honour, and the Alaska Panhandle Boundary Dispute". ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' 19.1 (2008): 20-41.</ref>


1907 saw a minor controversy over ] sailing into the Great Lakes via Canada without Canadian permission. To head off future embarrassments, in 1909 the two sides signed the ], and the ] was established to manage the Great Lakes and keep them disarmed. It was amended in World War II to allow the building and training of warships.<ref>{{cite book|first=Spencer|last=Tucker|title=World War II at Sea: An Encyclopedia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N0nrSWUHx6sC&pg=PA142|year=2011|publisher=ABC-CLIO|page=142|isbn=9781598844573}}</ref>
American defense arrangements with Canada are more extensive than with any other country.<ref>, US State Department</ref> The ], established in 1940, provides policy-level consultation on bilateral defense matters. The United States and Canada share ] (NATO) mutual security commitments. In addition, American and Canadian military forces have cooperated since 1958 on continental air defense within the framework of the ] (NORAD). There is also an active military exchange program between the two countries under which ] personnel have been involved in Iraq.{{Citation needed|date=February 2009}} Moreover, interoperability with the American armed forces has been a guiding principle of Canadian military force structuring and doctrine since the end of the Cold War. Canadian navy frigates, for instance, integrate seamlessly into American carrier battle groups.


===War in Afghanistan=== ==== Free trade rejected ====
{{Main|Reciprocity (Canadian politics)}}
{{Main|Canada's role in the invasion of Afghanistan}}
]
Canada's elite ] unit joined American special forces in Afghanistan shortly after the ]. Canadian forces joined the multinational coalition in ] in January 2002. On April 18, 2002, an American pilot ], killing four and wounding eight Canadians. A joint American-Canadian inquiry determined the cause of the incident to be pilot error, in which the pilot interpreted ground fire as an attack; the pilot ignored orders that he felt were "second-guessing" his field tactical decision.<ref name="friendly fire cbc">{{cite web
Anti-Americanism reached a shrill peak in 1911 in Canada.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Baker | first1 = W. M. | year = 1970 | title = A Case Study of Anti-Americanism in English-Speaking Canada: The Election Campaign of 1911 | journal = Canadian Historical Review | volume = 51 | issue = 4| pages = 426–449 | doi=10.3138/chr-051-04-04| s2cid = 161614104 }}</ref> The ] government in 1911 negotiated a ] treaty with the U.S. that would lower trade barriers. Canadian manufacturing interests were alarmed that free trade would allow the bigger and more efficient American factories to take their markets. The ] made it a central campaign issue in the ], warning that it would be a "sell-out" to the United States with economic annexation a special danger.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Clements | first1 = Kendrick A. | year = 1973 | title = Manifest Destiny and Canadian Reciprocity in 1911 | journal = Pacific Historical Review | volume = 42 | issue = 1| pages = 32–52 | doi=10.2307/3637741 | jstor=3637741}}</ref> The Conservative slogan was "No truck or trade with the Yankees", as they appealed to ] and nostalgia for the British Empire to win a major victory.<ref>{{cite book|first=Lewis E.|last=Ellis|title=Reciprocity, 1911: a study in Canadian–American relations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fz8fAAAAMAAJ|year=1968|publisher=Greenwood}}</ref><ref>Paolo E. Coletta, ''The Presidency of William Howard Taft'' (1973) pp. 141–152.</ref>
|url=http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/06/24/schmidt040624.html
|title=U.S. 'friendly fire' pilot won't face court martial
|publisher=CBC News
|date=2004-07-06
|accessdate=2004-01-28
}}</ref><ref name="friendly fire bbc">{{cite web
|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2073024.stm
|title=Pilots blamed for 'friendly fire' deaths
|publisher=BBC News
|date=2002-08-22
|accessdate=2007-01-28
}}</ref> Canadian forces assumed a six-month command rotation of the ] in 2003; in 2005, Canadians assumed operational command of the multi-national Brigade in ], with 2,300 troops, and supervises the ] in Kandahar, where al-Qaida forces are most active. Canada has also deployed naval forces in the Persian Gulf since 1991 in support of the UN Gulf Multinational Interdiction Force.<ref name="canada navy in gulf">{{cite web
|url=http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/focus/canada-us/backgrounder_e.asp
|title=CANADIAN NAVY TEAMS UP WITH U.S. CARRIER BATTLE GROUPS
|publisher=Department of National Defence
|date=2006-09-25
|accessdate=2007-01-28
}}</ref>


==== World War I ====
The ] maintains a ] ] named , which is intended "to give American citizens a better sense of the scope of Canada's role in North American and Global Security and the War on Terror".
British Canadians were annoyed during a brief period from 1914 to 1916, when the United States insisted on neutrality and seemed to profit heavily, while Canada was sacrificing its wealth and its youth. However, when the US finally declared war on Germany in April 1917, there was swift cooperation and friendly coordination, as one historian reports:<blockquote> Official co-operation between Canada and the United States—the pooling of grain, fuel, power, and transportation resources, the underwriting of a Canadian loan by bankers of New York—produced a good effect on the public mind. Canadian recruiting detachments were welcomed in the United States, while a reciprocal agreement was ratified to facilitate the return of draft evaders. A Canadian War Mission was established at Washington, and in many other ways, the activities of the two countries were coordinated for efficiency. Immigration regulations were relaxed and thousands of American farmhands crossed the border to assist in harvesting Canadian crops. Officially and publicly, at least, the two nations were on better terms than ever before in their history, and on the American side, this attitude extended through almost all classes of society.<ref>Hugh Ll. Keenleyside, ''Canada and the United States'' (1929) p 373. </ref></blockquote>


==== Post-World War I ====
The ] and some recent Liberal leadership candidates have expressed opposition to Canada's expanded role in the Afghan conflict on the ground that it is inconsistent with Canada's historic role (since the ]) of peacekeeping operations.
Canada demanded and received permission from London to send its delegation to the Versailles Peace Talks in 1919, with the proviso that it sign the treaty under the British Empire. Throughout the 1920s, Canada began assuming greater responsibility for its own foreign and military affairs. In 1927, the U.S. and Canada exchanged ambassadors for the first time with Canada appointing ] and America ] respectively. The postwar era saw the United States pursue isolationism while Canada became an active member of the ], the ], and the ].


In July 1923, as part of his Pacific Northwest tour and a week before his death, U.S. President ] visited ], making him the first American head of state to visit confederated Canada. The then Premier of British Columbia, ], and then mayor of Vancouver, ], hosted a lunch in his honor at the ]. Over 50,000 people heard Harding speak in ]. A monument to Harding designed by ] was unveiled in Stanley Park in 1925.<ref>Warren G. Harding & Stanley Park. The History of Metropolitan Vancouver. ''Vancouver.ca'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150916212018/http://www.vancouverhistory.ca/archives_harding.htm|date=September 16, 2015}}. Retrieved June 11, 2017</ref>
===2003 Invasion of Iraq===
{{See also|Canada and the Iraq War|Canada and Iraq War Resisters}}


Relations with the United States remained cordial until 1930 when Canada vehemently protested the new ] by which the U.S. raised tariffs on products imported from Canada. Canada retaliated with higher tariffs of its own against American products and moved toward more trade within the British Commonwealth. U.S.–Canadian trade fell 75% as the ] dragged both countries down.<ref>Richard N. Kottman, "Herbert Hoover and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff: Canada, A Case Study", ''Journal of American History'', Vol. 62, No. 3 (December 1975), pp. 609–635
According to contemporary polls, the majority of Canadians were opposed to the ]. The Canadian government, under current Prime Minister ], maintains a position with emphasis on ] authority.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} Many Canadians, and the former Liberal government of ] (as well as many Americans such as ]),<ref name="clinton canada">{{cite web
</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=McDonald |first1=Judith |display-authors=etal |year=1997|title=Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot–Hawley Tariff", (1997) |journal=Journal of Economic History |volume=57 |issue=4|pages=802–826 |jstor=2951161 |doi=10.1017/S0022050700019549 |s2cid=154380335 }}</ref>
|url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FLAC.20061120.BCSPECTOR20%2FTPStory%2FspecialComment%2Fcolumnists&ord=1170048528746&brand=theglobeandmail
|title=Clinton speaks on Afghanistan, and Canada listens
|publisher=The Globe and Mail
|last=Spector
|first=Norman
|date=2006-11-20
|accessdate=2007-01-28
}}</ref> made a policy distinction between conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, unlike the ], which linked these together in a "Global war on terror".


During the 1920s, the war and naval departments of both nations designed war game scenarios with the other as an enemy as part of routine training exercises. In 1921, Canada developed ] for an attack on American cities and for forestalling an invasion by the United States until British reinforcements could arrive. Throughout the later 1920s and 1930s, the ] developed a plan for a war with the ] waged largely on North American territory: ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901412_2.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |first=Peter |last=Carlson |title=Raiding the Icebox |date=December 30, 2005}}</ref>
==Trade==
{{Main|Canada – American trade relations}}
Canada and the United States have the world's largest trading relationship, with huge quantities of goods and people flowing across the border each year. Since the 1987 ], there have been no ]s on most goods passed between the two countries.


]'s meeting in 1927 with British Ambassador Sir Esme Howard agreed on the "absurdity of contemplating the possibility of war between the United States and the British Empire".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bell |first1=Christopher M. |year=1997 |title=Thinking the Unthinkable: British and American Naval Strategies for an Anglo-American War, 1918–1931 |journal=International History Review |volume=19 |issue=4|pages=789–808 |doi=10.1080/07075332.1997.9640804}}</ref>
With such a massive trading relationship, trade disputes between the two countries are frequent and inevitable. In the course of the ], the U.S. has placed tariffs on Canadian ] because of what it argues is an unfair Canadian government subsidy, a claim which Canada disputes. The dispute has cycled through several agreements and arbitration cases. Other notable disputes include the ], and Canadian cultural "restrictions" on magazines and television (See ], ], and ]). Canadians have been criticized about such things as the ban on ] since a case of ] was discovered in 2003 in cows from the United States (and a few subsequent cases) and the high American agricultural subsidies. Concerns in Canada also run high over aspects of the ] (NAFTA) such as Chapter 11.{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}
] speaking at ]. Roosevelt spoke on the U.S. relations with Canada while there.]]
In 1938, as the roots of ] were set in motion, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt gave a public speech at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, declaring that the United States would not sit idly by if another power tried to dominate Canada. Diplomats saw it as a clear warning to Germany not to attack Canada.<ref>Arnold A. Offner, ''American Appeasement: United States Foreign Policy and Germany, 1933–1938'' (1969) p. 256</ref>


=== World War II ===
One ongoing and complex trade issue involves the importation of cheaper ] from Canada to the United States. Due to the Canadian government's ] as part of their state-run medical system, prices for prescription drugs can be a fraction of the price paid by consumers in the unregulated American market. While laws in the United States have been passed at the national level against such sales, specific state and local governments have passed their own legislation to allow the trade to continue. American drug companies—often supporters of political campaigns—have come out against the practice.
The two nations cooperated closely in World War II,<ref>Galen Roger Perras, ''Franklin Roosevelt and the Origins of the Canadian-American Security Alliance, 1933–1945'' (1998)</ref> as both nations saw new levels of prosperity and a determination to defeat the ]. Prime Minister ] and President ] were determined not to repeat the mistakes of their predecessors.<ref>Richard Jensen, "Nationalism and Civic Duty in Wartime: Comparing World Wars in Canada and America", ''Canadian Issues / Thèmes Canadiens'', December 2004, pp 6–10</ref> They met in August 1940 at Ogdensburg, issuing a declaration calling for close cooperation, and formed the ] (PJBD).


King sought to raise Canada's international visibility by hosting the August 1943 ] in Quebec on military and political strategy; he was a gracious host but was kept out of the important meetings by ] and Roosevelt.
According to a 2003 study commissioned by the Canadian Embassy in the United States, based on 2001 data, Canadian–American ] supported 5.2 million American jobs.


Canada allowed the construction of the ] and participated in the building of the atomic bomb. 49,000 Americans joined the ] (Canadian) or ] (British) air forces through the ], which had Roosevelt's permission to recruit in the U.S. in 1940–42.<ref>Rachel Lea Heide, "Allies in Complicity: The United States, Canada, and the Clayton Knight Committee's Clandestine Recruiting of Americans for the Royal Canadian Air Force, 1940–1942", ''Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 2004'', Vol. 15, pp 207–230</ref>
{| class="sortable wikitable"
|- style="text-align:center;"
!]
!U.S. Jobs Supported<ref> and </ref>
!Rank
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Alabama}} ||72,000||24
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Alaska}} ||13,000||48
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Arizona}} ||89,000||22
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Arkansas}} ||45,000||32
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|California}} ||626,000||1
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Colorado}} ||93,000||21
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Connecticut}} ||67,000||27
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Delaware}} ||16,000||46
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|District of Columbia}} ||29,000||38
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Florida}} ||289,000||4
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Georgia (U.S. state)|name=Georgia}} ||152,000||10
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Hawaii}} ||26,000||39
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Idaho}} ||23,000||43
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Illinois}} ||237,000||5
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Indiana}} ||112,000||14
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Iowa}} ||55,000||30
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Kansas}} ||51,000||31
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Kentucky}} ||69,000||26
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Louisiana}} ||73,000||23
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Maine}} ||24,000||41
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Maryland}} ||101,000||20
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Massachusetts}} ||134,000||13
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Michigan}} ||174,000||8
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Minnesota}} ||103,000||19
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Mississippi}} ||43,000||34
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Missouri}} ||108,000||16
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Montana}} ||16,000||45
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Nebraska}} ||36,000||36
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Nevada}} ||43,000||35
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|New Hampshire}} ||24,000||42
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|New Jersey}} ||153,000||9
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|New Mexico}} ||30,000||37
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|New York}} ||348,000||3
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|North Carolina}} ||151,000||11
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|North Dakota}} ||13,000||49
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Ohio}} ||212,000||7
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Oklahoma}} ||58,000||29
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Oregon}} ||63,000||28
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Pennsylvania}} ||219,000||6
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Rhode Island}} ||19,000||44
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|South Carolina}} ||69,000||25
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|South Dakota}} ||15,000||47
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Tennessee}} ||108,000||15
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Texas}} ||369,000||2
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Utah}} ||44,000||33
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Vermont}} ||12,000||50
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Virginia}} ||141,000||12
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Washington}} ||108,000||17
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|West Virginia}} ||25,000||40
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Wisconsin}} ||103,000||18
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| {{flag|Wyoming}} ||9,000||51
|-
| style="text-align:left;"| Total || 5,210,000 ||
|}


American attempts in the mid-1930s to integrate British Columbia into a united West Coast military command had aroused Canadian opposition. Fearing a Japanese invasion of Canada's vulnerable ], American officials urged the creation of a united military command for an eastern Pacific Ocean ]. Canadian leaders feared ] and the loss of autonomy more than a Japanese invasion. In 1941, Canadians successfully argued within the PJBD for cooperation rather than the unified command for the West Coast.<ref>Galen Roger Perras, "Who Will Defend British Columbia? Unity of Command on the West Coast, 1934–1942", ''Pacific Northwest Quarterly'', Spring 1997, Vol. 88 Issue 2, pp 59–69</ref>
==Environmental issues==
]
The two countries work closely to resolve trans-border environmental issues, an area of increasing importance in the bilateral relationship. A principal instrument of this cooperation is the ] (IJC), established as part of the ] to resolve differences and promote international cooperation on boundary waters. The ] is another historic example of joint cooperation in controlling trans-border water pollution. However, there have been some disputes. Most recently, the ] Outlet, a project instituted by North Dakota, has angered Manitobans who fear that their water may soon become polluted as a result of this project.
The two governments also consult semi-annually on trans-border air pollution. Under the ], both countries have made substantial progress in coordinating and implementing their acid rain control programs and signed an annex on ground level ozone in 2000. Despite this trans-border air pollution remains an issue, particularly in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence watershed during the summer. The main source of this trans-border pollution results from coal fired power stations, most of them located in the ].


==== Newfoundland ====
Currently neither of the countries' governments support the ], which set out time scheduled curbing of greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike the United States, Canada has ratified the agreement. Yet after ratification, due to internal political conflict within Canada, the Canadian government does not enforce the ], and has received criticism from environmental groups and from other governments for its climate change positions.
The United States built large military bases in ] during World War II. At the time it was a ], having lost dominion status. The American spending ended the depression and brought new prosperity; Newfoundland's business community sought closer ties with the United States as expressed by the ]. Ottawa took notice and wanted Newfoundland to join Canada, which it did after hotly contested referendums. There was little demand in the United States for the acquisition of Newfoundland, so the United States did not protest the British decision not to allow an American option on the ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=McNeil Earle |first1=Karl |year=1998 |title=Cousins of a Kind: The Newfoundland and Labrador Relationship with the United States |journal=American Review of Canadian Studies |volume=28 |issue=4|pages=387–411 |doi=10.1080/02722019809481611}}</ref>


==Illicit drugs== === Cold War ===
]
In 2003 the American government became concerned when members of the Canadian government announced plans to ] ]. David Murray, an assistant to U.S. ] ], said in a ] interview that, "We would have to respond. We would be forced to respond."<ref></ref> However the ] of the ] in early 2006 halted the liberalization of marijuana laws for the foreseeable future. The Canadian government currently grows ] only in former copper mines.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}}
Prime Minister ], working closely with his Foreign Minister ], handled foreign relations 1945–48 cautiously. Canada donated money to the United Kingdom to help it rebuild; was elected to the ]; and helped design ]. However, Mackenzie King rejected free trade with the United States,<ref>C. P. Stacey, ''Canada and the Age of Conflict: A History of Canadian External Policies. Volume 2, 1921–1948: The Mackenzie King Era'' (1982) pp 420–424.</ref> and decided not to play a role in the ].<ref>Hector Mackenzie, "Golden Decade (s)? Reappraising Canada's International Relations in the 1940s and 1950s". ''British Journal of Canadian Studies'' 23.2 (2010): 179–206.</ref> Canada had been actively involved in the League of Nations, primarily because it could act separately from Britain. It played a ], as well as the ]. It played a somewhat larger role in 1947 in designing the ].<ref>Don Munton and John Kirton, eds. ''Cases and Readings in Canadian Foreign Policy Since World War II'' (1992) pp 2–18.</ref>
After the mid-20th century onwards, Canada and the United States became extremely close partners. Canada was a close ally of the United States during the ].


==== Vietnam War resisters ====
==Arar affair==
{{Further|Vietnam War resisters in Canada}}
{{Main|Maher Arar}}
While Canada openly accepted draft evaders and later deserters from the United States, there was never a serious international dispute due to Canada's actions, while Sweden's acceptance was heavily criticized by the United States. The issue of accepting American exiles became a local political debate in Canada that focused on Canada's sovereignty in its immigration law. The United States did not become involved because American politicians viewed Canada as a geographically close ally not worth disturbing.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://journals.openedition.org/eccs/1479?lang=en#ftn1|title='Hell, they're your problem, not ours': Draft Dodgers, Military Deserters and Canada–United States Relations in the Vietnam War Era |first= Luke|last= Stewart|journal=Études Canadiennes / Canadian Studies |year=2018 |issue=85 |pages=67–96 |publisher= Open Edition |doi=10.4000/eccs.1479 |s2cid=181777562 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
On September 26, 2002, U.S. officials, acting upon a tip from Canadian law enforcement, detained ] on suspicion of terrorist links. Arar is a dual citizen of Canada and Syria and was traveling through New York as part of a trip from ] to Canada.


==== Nixon Shock 1971 ====
Despite traveling on a Canadian passport, Arar was deported to Syria, his country of birth. He was imprisoned there for over a year and tortured repeatedly. The decision by U.S. officials to deport him to Syria, his imprisonment and torture there, and the extent of collaboration between U.S. and Canadian officials became a political issue in Canada at the time.
{{Main|Nixon shock|Third Option}}
] of the Parliament of Canada, 1972]]
The United States had become Canada's largest market, and after the war, the Canadian economy became dependent on smooth trade flows with the United States so much that in 1971 when the United States enacted the "]" economic policies (including a 10% tariff on all imports) it put the Canadian government into a panic. Washington refused to exempt Canada from its 1971 New Economic Policy, so Trudeau saw a solution in closer economic ties with Europe. Trudeau proposed a "]" policy of diversifying Canada's trade and downgrading the importance of the American market. In a 1972 speech in ], Nixon declared the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States dead.<ref>Bruce Muirhead, "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock", ''American Review of Canadian Studies'', Vol. 34, 2004 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090323010245/http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5008438189 |date=March 23, 2009 }}</ref>


Relations deteriorated on many points in the Nixon years (1969–74), including trade disputes, defense agreements, energy, fishing, the environment, cultural imperialism, and foreign policy. They changed for the better when Trudeau and ] found a better rapport. The late 1970s saw a more sympathetic American attitude toward Canadian political and economic needs, the pardoning of draft evaders who had moved to Canada, and the passing of old such as the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War. Canada more than ever welcomed American investments during "the ]" that hurt both nations.<ref>Lily Gardner Feldman, "Canada and the United States in the 1970s: Rift and Reconciliation". ''The World Today'' 34.12 (1978): 484–492. </ref>
Canadian officials have since said that Arar was not linked in any way to terrorism, and the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, has issued a formal apology and a $10.5 million (CAD) settlement to Arar, who nonetheless remains on an American terrorist watchlist.


==Diplomacy== === 1990s ===
] in October 1992]]
===Territorial disputes===
The main issues in Canada–US relations in the 1990s focused on the ], which was signed in 1994. It created a common market that by 2014 was worth $19 trillion, encompassed 470 million people, and had created millions of jobs.<ref>Hills, Carla A. "NAFTA's Economic Upsides: The View from the United States". ''Foreign Affairs'' 93 (2014): 122. </ref> Wilson says, "Few dispute that NAFTA has produced large and measurable gains for Canadian consumers, workers, and businesses". However, he adds, "NAFTA has fallen well short of expectations."<ref>Wilson, Michael. "NAFTA's Unfinished Business: The View from Canada". ''Foreign Affairs'' 93 (2014): 128. </ref>
{{See also|List of areas disputed by Canada and the United States}}
{{Col-begin}}


=== Migration history ===
{{Col-1-of-3}}
{{Main|American immigration to Canada}}
From the 1750s to the 21st century, there has been an extensive mingling of the Canadian and American populations, with large movements in both directions.<ref>Marcus Lee Hansen, ''The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical'' (1940)</ref>


New England ] settled large parts of ] before 1775 and were neutral during the ].<ref>John Brebner, ''The Neutral Yankees of Nova Scotia: A Marginal Colony During the Revolutionary Years'' (1937)</ref> At the end of the American Revolution, about 75,000 ]s moved out of the new United States to the eastern Atlantic provinces and south of Quebec. From 1790 to 1812 many farmers moved from New York and New England into ] (mostly to Niagara, and the north shore of ]). In the mid and late 19th century gold rushes attracted American prospectors, mostly to ] after the ], ], and later to the ]. In the early 20th century, the opening of land blocks in the ] attracted many farmers from the ]. Many ] immigrated from ] and formed their colonies. In the 1890s some ] went north to form communities in ] after ] rejected ].<ref>Marcus Lee Hansen, ''The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical'' (1940); David D. Harvey, ''Americans in Canada: Migration and Settlement since 1840'' (1991)</ref> The 1960s saw the arrival of about 50,000 draft-dodgers who opposed the ].<ref>Renee Kasinsky, "Refugees from Militarism: Draft Age Americans in Canada'' (1976)</ref>
These include maritime boundary disputes:
] landing in present-day ]. Large movements of population occurred in both directions from the late-18th to 20th century.]]
Canada was a way station through which immigrants from other lands stopped for a while, ultimately heading to the U.S. Between 1851 and 1951, 7.1 million people arrived in Canada (mostly from ]), and 6.6 million left Canada, most of them to the U.S.<ref name="HEAEG1980"/> After 1850, the pace of industrialization and urbanization was much faster in the United States, drawing a wide range of immigrants from the North. By 1870, 1/6 of all the people born in Canada had moved to the United States, with the highest concentrations in New England, which was the destination of Francophone emigrants from Quebec and Anglophone emigrants from the Maritimes. It was common for people to move back and forth across the border, such as seasonal lumberjacks, entrepreneurs looking for larger markets, and families looking for jobs in the textile mills that paid much higher wages than in Canada.<ref>John J. Bukowczyk et al. ''Permeable Border: The Great Lakes Region as Transnational Region, 1650–1990'' (University of Pittsburgh Press. 2005)</ref>


The southward migration slacked off after 1890, as Canadian industry began a growth spurt. By then, the American frontier was closing, and thousands of farmers looking for fresh land moved from the United States north into the Prairie Provinces. The net result of the flows was that in 1901 there were 128,000 American-born residents in Canada (3.5% of the Canadian population) and 1.18 million Canadian-born residents in the United States (1.6% of the U.S. population).<ref>J. Castell Hopkins, ''The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs: 1902'' (1903), p. 327.</ref>
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] and ]


In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, about 900,000 ] moved to the U.S., with 395,000 residents there in 1900. Two-thirds went to mill towns in New England, where they formed distinctive ethnic communities. By the late 20th century, most had abandoned the French language (see ]), but most kept the Catholic religion.<ref>Yves Roby, ''The Franco-Americans of New England'' (2004)</ref><ref name="HEAEG1980">{{cite encyclopedia|last=Barkan|first=Elliott Robert|editor-last=Thernstrom|editor-first=Stephan|editor-link=Stephan Thernstrom|editor-last2=Orlov|editor-first2=Ann|editor-last3=Handlin|editor-first3=Oscar|editor-link3=Oscar Handlin|title=French Canadians|page=392|encyclopedia=Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups|url=https://archive.org/details/harvardencyclope00ther|year=1980|publisher=]|isbn=0674375122|oclc=1038430174}}</ref> About twice as many ] came to the U.S., but they did not form distinctive ethnic settlements.<ref name="HEAEG1980_2">{{cite encyclopedia|last=Brookes|first=Alan A.|editor-last=Thernstrom|editor-first=Stephan|editor-link=Stephan Thernstrom|editor-last2=Orlov|editor-first2=Ann|editor-last3=Handlin|editor-first3=Oscar|editor-link3=Oscar Handlin|title=Canadians, British|page=191|encyclopedia=Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups|url=https://archive.org/details/harvardencyclope00ther|year=1980|publisher=]|isbn=0674375122|oclc=1038430174}}</ref>
{{Col-2-of-3}}


== Relations between political executives ==
Territorial land disputes:
The executive of each country is represented differently. The ] serves as both the head of state and head of government, and his "administration" is the executive, while the ] is head of government only, and his or her "government" or "ministry" directs the executive.
<!-- leaders should go in the alphabetic order of their surnames in the titles, for neutrality's sake -->


=== W. L. Mackenzie King and Franklin D. Roosevelt (October 1935 – April 1945) ===
*] (] boundary)
], ], and ] at the ] in 1943.]]
*]
In 1940, ] and ] signed a defense pact, known as the ]. King hosted conferences for Churchill and Roosevelt, but did not participate in the talks.
*]


=== Louis St. Laurent and Harry S. Truman (November 1948 – January 1953) ===
{{Col-3-of-3}}
Prime Minister Laurent and President Truman were both anti-communist during the early years of the ].


=== John G. Diefenbaker and Dwight Eisenhower (June 1957 – January 1961) ===
and disputes over the international status of the:


President ] (1952–1961) took pains to foster good relations with Progressive Conservative ] (1957–1963). That led to the approval of plans to join in ], an integrated air defense system, in mid-1957. Relations with President John Kennedy were much less cordial. Diefenbaker opposed ] in the ] and helped force it out of the ]. His ] from the United States led to his government's downfall.<ref>Soloman Gabriel, ''Foreign Policy of Canada: A Study in Diefenbaker's Years'' (1987).</ref>
*]
*]


=== John G. Diefenbaker and John F. Kennedy (January 1961 – April 1963) ===
{{Col-end}}
Diefenbaker and ] did not get along well personally. This was evident in Diefenbaker's response to the Cuban Missile Crisis, where he was slow to support the United States. However, Diefenbaker's Minister of Defence went behind Diefenbaker's back and sent Canada's military to high alert given Canada's legal treaty obligations, to try and appease Kennedy.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Potter |first1=Mitch |title=JFK's war with Diefenbaker |url=https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/11/18/jfks_war_with_diefenbaker.html |newspaper=The Toronto Star |date=November 18, 2013 |access-date=June 12, 2018}}</ref>


=== Lester B. Pearson and Lyndon B. Johnson (November 1963 – April 1968) ===
====Arctic disputes====
In 1965, Prime Minister ] gave a speech in Philadelphia criticizing American involvement in the ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Preston |first1=Andrew |title=Balancing War and Peace: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Vietnam War, 1961–1965 |journal=Diplomatic History |volume=27 |pages=73–111 |doi=10.1111/1467-7709.00340 |year=2003 }}</ref> This infuriated ], who gave him a harsh talk, saying "You don't come here and piss on my rug".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Brean |first1=Joseph |title='I've been called worse things by better people: A history of Canadian PMs' not-so-diplomatic one-liners |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/ive-been-called-worse-things-by-better-people-a-history-of-canadian-pms-not-so-diplomatic-one-liners |website=National Post |publisher=National Post |access-date=June 13, 2018|date=November 17, 2014 }}</ref>
A long-simmering dispute between Canada and the U.S. involves the issue of Canadian sovereignty over the ] (the sea passages in the Arctic). Canada’s assertion that the Northwest Passage represents internal (territorial) waters has been challenged by other countries, especially the U.S., which argue that these waters constitute an international strait (international waters). Canadians were incensed when Americans drove the reinforced oil tanker {{SS|Manhattan|1962|2}} through the Northwest Passage in 1969, followed by the icebreaker ] in 1985, both without asking for Canadian permission. In 1970, the Canadian government enacted the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, which asserts Canadian regulatory control over pollution within a 100-mile zone. In response, the United States in 1970 stated, "We cannot accept the assertion of a Canadian claim that the Arctic waters are internal waters of Canada…. Such acceptance would jeopardize the freedom of navigation essential for United States naval activities worldwide." A compromise of sorts was reached in 1988, by an agreement on "Arctic Cooperation," which pledges that voyages of American icebreakers "will be undertaken with the consent of the Government of Canada." However the agreement did not alter either country's basic legal position. In January 2006 David Wilkins, the American ambassador to Canada, said his government opposes Stephen Harper's proposed plan to deploy military icebreakers in the Arctic to detect interlopers and assert Canadian sovereignty over those waters.<ref>Matthew Carnaghan, Allison Goody, (Library of Parliament: Political and Social Affairs Division, January 26, 2006); </ref> In August 2007, former US ambassador to Canada, ], stated that in 2005 he informed his government that it should re-evaluate its assertion that the Northwest Passage is an international sea body, and that it should belong to Canada. His advice was rejected and in 2007 Bush and Harper took opposite positions.<ref></ref>


=== Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan (September 1984 – January 1989) ===
===Common memberships===
]
{{UKUSA}}
Relations between ] and ] were famously close.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The president will see you now: my stories and lessons from Ronald Reagan's final years|last=Grande|first=Peggy|year=2017|isbn=9780316396455|edition= First|location=New York|chapter=8: Rawhide's Ranch|oclc=951764632}}</ref> This relationship resulted in negotiations for the ], and the ] to reduce acid-rain-causing emissions, both major policy goals of Mulroney, that would be finalized under the presidency of ]. Mulroney delivered eulogies at the funerals of both ] and ].
Canada and the United States both hold membership in a number of multinational organizations such as:


=== Jean Chrétien and Bill Clinton (November 1993 – January 2001) ===
] summit meeting in November 1993]]
Although ] was wary of appearing too close to President ],{{citation needed|date=May 2018}} both men had a passion for golf. During a news conference with Prime Minister Chrétien in April 1997, President Clinton quipped "I don't know if any two world leaders have played golf together more than we have, but we meant to break a record".<ref name="The President's News Conference With Prime Minister Jean Chretien of Canada">
{{cite web
|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=53964
|title=The President's News Conference With Prime Minister Jean Chretien of Canada
|date=April 8, 1997
|publisher=The American Presidency Project
|access-date=May 16, 2018
}}</ref> Their governments had many small trade quarrels over the Canadian content of American magazines, softwood lumber, and so on, but on the whole were quite friendly. Both leaders had run on reforming or abolishing ], but the agreement went ahead with the addition of environmental and labor side agreements. Crucially, the Clinton administration lent rhetorical support to Canadian unity during the ] on separation from Canada.<ref>{{cite web|title=Clinton, in Talk to Canadians, Opposes Quebec Separation|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/24/world/clinton-in-talk-to-canadians-opposes-quebec-separation.html|last=Jehl|first=Douglas|work=The New York Times|date=February 24, 1995}}</ref>

=== Jean Chrétien and George W. Bush (January 2001 – December 2003) ===
]
Relations between Chrétien and ] were strained throughout their overlapping times in office. Canada offered its full assistance to the U.S. as the ] were unfolding. One tangible show of support was ], in which more than 200 U.S.-bound flights were diverted to Canada after the U.S. shut down their airspace. Later, however, Chrétien publicly mused that U.S. foreign policy might be part of the "root causes" of terrorism. Some Americans criticized his "smug moralism", and Chrétien's public refusal to support the 2003 Iraq war was met with negative responses in the United States, especially among conservatives.<ref>{{cite book|first=Daniel|last=Drache|title=Big Picture Realities: Canada and Mexico at the Crossroads|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hKfvb5zf8oUC&pg=PA115|year=2008|publisher=Wilfrid Laurier U.P.|page=115|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9781554582334}}</ref>

=== Stephen Harper and George W. Bush (February 2006 – January 2009) ===
]
] and George W. Bush were thought to share warm personal relations and also close ties between their administrations. Because Bush was so unpopular among liberals in Canada (particularly in the media), this was underplayed by the Harper government.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prime-ministers-and-presidents-1.848083 | work=CBC News | title=Prime ministers and presidents | date=February 18, 2009}}</ref>

Shortly after being congratulated by Bush for his victory in February 2006, Harper rebuked the U.S. ambassador to Canada ] for criticizing the ] plans to assert Canada's sovereignty over the ] waters with military force.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/guest-column-time-canada-to-negotiate-the-northwest-passage-1.1047758|title=Guest column: Time, Canada, to negotiate the Northwest Passage|work=CBC News|access-date=July 18, 2017|language=en}}</ref>

=== Stephen Harper and Barack Obama (January 2009 – November 2015) ===
]
President ]'s first international trip was to Canada on February 19, 2009, thereby sending a strong message of peace and cooperation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/obama-to-visit-canada-feb-19-pmo-confirms-1.364714 |title=Obama to visit Canada Feb. 19, PMO confirms – CTV News |publisher=Ctv.ca |date=January 28, 2009 |access-date=February 26, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090606040521/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090128/canada_obama_090128/20090128?hub=Politics |archive-date=June 6, 2009 }}</ref> Except Canadian lobbying against "Buy American" provisions in the U.S. ], relations between the two administrations were smooth.

They also held friendly bets on hockey games during the Winter Olympic season. In the ] hosted by Canada in ], Canada defeated the U.S. in both gold medal matches, entitling Stephen Harper to receive a case of ] beer from Barack Obama; in reverse, if Canada had lost, Harper would have provided a case of ] beer to Obama.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/obama-loses-boozy-bet-with-harper/article4188210/|title=Obama loses boozy bet with Harper|work=The Globe and Mail|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> During the 2014 Winter Olympics, alongside ] ] & ] ], Stephen Harper was given a case of ] by Obama for the Canadian gold medal victory over the U.S. in women's hockey, and the semi-final victory over the U.S. in men's hockey.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/2014/02/23/21489991.html|title=Barack Obama follows through on Olympic beer bet|work=canoe.ca|access-date=April 27, 2016|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://archive.today/20140225215255/http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/2014/02/23/21489991.html|archive-date=25 February 2014}}</ref>

==== Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) (2011) ====
On February 4, 2011, Harper and Obama issued a "Declaration on a Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/04/joint-statement-president-obama-and-prime-minister-harper-canada-regul-0 |title=Joint Statement by President Obama and Prime Minister Harper of Canada on Regulatory Cooperation |date=February 4, 2011 |via=] |work=] |access-date=February 26, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=3931|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130910181827/http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=3931 |archive-date=September 10, 2013 |title=PM and U.S. President Obama announce shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness between Canada and the United States |publisher=Office of the Prime Minister of Canada |date=February 4, 2011 |access-date=February 26, 2011}}</ref> and announced the creation of the ] "to increase regulatory transparency and coordination between the two countries."<ref name=OPM1>{{cite web |date=December 7, 2011 |location=Washington, D.C. |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=4511 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130729152814/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=4511 |archive-date=July 29, 2013 |publisher=Office of the Prime Minister of Canada |title=United States–Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan: Developing and implementing the Joint Action Plan}}</ref>

] and the United States ] (FDA) under the RCC mandate, undertook the "first of its kind" initiative by selecting "as its first area of alignment common cold indications for certain over-the-counter antihistamine ingredients (GC January 10, 2013)".<ref name=GC20130110>{{cite web |publisher=Government of Canada |series=Canada's Action Plan |title=Notice: Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Over-the-Counter (OTC) Products: Common Monograph Working Group: Selection of a Monograph for Alignment |url=http://actionplan.gc.ca/en/page/rcc-ccr/notice-regulatory-cooperation-council-rcc-over |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141108070216/http://actionplan.gc.ca/en/page/rcc-ccr/notice-regulatory-cooperation-council-rcc-over |archive-date=November 8, 2014 |date=January 10, 2013 |access-date=February 15, 2013 }}</ref>

On December 7, 2011, Harper flew to Washington, met with Obama, and signed an agreement to implement the joint action plans that had been developed since the initial meeting in February. The plans called on both countries to spend more on border infrastructure, share more information on people who cross the border, and acknowledge more of each other's safety and security inspection on third-country traffic. An editorial in ''The Globe and Mail'' praised the agreement for giving Canada the ability to track whether failed refugee claimants have left Canada via the U.S. and for eliminating "duplicated baggage screenings on connecting flights".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/editorials/canada-us-border-agreement-a-good-thing/article2263711/ |location=Toronto |work=The Globe and Mail |title=Canada–U.S. border agreement a good thing |date=September 6, 2012}}</ref> The agreement is not a legally binding treaty and relies on the political will and ability of the executives of both governments to implement the terms of the agreement. These types of executive agreements are routine—on both sides of the Canada–U.S. border.

=== Justin Trudeau and Barack Obama (November 2015 – January 2017) ===
] and Prime Minister ], March 2016]]
President Barack Obama and Prime Minister ] first met formally at the ] in ], ] in November 2015, nearly a week after the latter was sworn into the office. Both leaders expressed eagerness for increased cooperation and coordination between the two countries during Trudeau's government with Trudeau promising an "enhanced Canada–U.S. partnership".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Jordan|first1=Roger|title=Trudeau promises Obama an enhanced Canada–US partnership|url=https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/11/20/cana-n20.html|access-date=January 2, 2016|work=]|publisher=]|date=November 20, 2015}}</ref>

On November 6, 2015, Obama announced the ]'s rejection of the proposed ], the fourth phase of the ] ] system running between Canada and the United States, to which Trudeau expressed disappointment but said that the rejection would not damage Canada–U.S. relations and would instead provide a "fresh start" to strengthening ties through cooperation and coordination, saying that "Canada–U.S. relationship is much bigger than any one project."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Harris|first1=Kathleen|title=Justin Trudeau 'disappointed' with U.S. rejection of Keystone XL|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-keystone-pipeline-trudeau-obama-1.3307458|access-date=January 2, 2016|work=]|publisher=]|date=November 6, 2015}}</ref> Obama has since praised Trudeau's efforts to prioritize the reduction of climate change, calling it "extraordinarily helpful" to establish a ] on addressing the issue.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Hall|first1=Chris|title=Trudeau warmly embraced by Obama, but don't expect concessions from U.S.|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-barack-obama-apec-chris-hall-1.3326179|access-date=January 2, 2016|work=]|publisher=]|date=November 20, 2015}}</ref>

Although Trudeau has told Obama his plans to withdraw Canada's ] jets ] in the ] against ], Trudeau said that Canada will still "do more than its part" in combating the terrorist group by increasing the number of ] members training and fighting on the ground in ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Cullen|first1=Catherine|title=Justin Trudeau says Canada to increase the number of training troops in Iraq|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-iraq-trainers-military-1.3322288|access-date=January 2, 2016|work=]|publisher=]|date=November 17, 2015}}</ref>

Trudeau visited the ] for an official visit and state dinner on March 10, 2016.<ref>{{cite news|title=Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau set a date for the first meeting in Washington|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/12/28/barack-obama-and-justin-trudeau-set-a-date-for-first-meeting-in-washington.html|access-date=January 2, 2016|work=]|agency=]|date=December 28, 2015}}</ref> Trudeau and Obama were reported to have shared warm personal relations during the visit, making humorous remarks about which country was better at hockey and which country had better beer.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2016/03/10/justin-trudeau-meeting-barack-obama-in-washington.html|title=Obama welcomes Trudeau to White House, 'About time, eh?'|date=March 10, 2016|work=thestar.com|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> Obama complimented Trudeau's ] for its "message of hope and change" and "positive and optimistic vision". Obama and Trudeau also held "productive" discussions on climate change and relations between the two countries, and Trudeau invited Obama to speak in the Canadian parliament in Ottawa later in the year.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/obama-on-growing-friendship-with-trudeau----what-s-not-to-like--/42014494|title=Obama on growing friendship with Trudeau – 'What's not to like?'|work=SWI swissinfo.ch|access-date=April 27, 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160318171615/http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/obama-on-growing-friendship-with-trudeau----what-s-not-to-like--/42014494|archive-date=March 18, 2016}}</ref>

=== Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump (January 2017 – January 2021) ===
] and Prime Minister ], June 2019]]
Following the victory of ] in the ], Trudeau congratulated him and invited him to visit Canada at the "earliest opportunity".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Harris|first1=Kathleen|title=Justin Trudeau invites Donald Trump to visit Canada during the call that marks 'strong beginning'|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-trump-visit-canada-1.3845013|access-date=November 11, 2016|work=]|date=November 10, 2016}}</ref> Prime Minister Trudeau and President Trump formally met for the first time at the White House on February 13, 2017, nearly a month after Trump was sworn into the office. Trump has ruffled relations with Canada with tariffs on softwood lumber.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-trudeau-softwood-lumber-response-1.4085315|title=It's Trudeau's move after Trump goes from tough talk to action with lumber duties: Chris Hall|work=CBC News|access-date=April 26, 2017|language=en}}</ref> ] was brought up by Trump as an area that needed negotiating.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2017/04/25/prime-minister-justin-trudeau-speaks-united-states-president-donald-trump|title=Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with United States President Donald Trump|date=April 25, 2017|work=Prime Minister of Canada|access-date=April 26, 2017|language=en}}</ref>

In 2018, Trump and Trudeau negotiated the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), a free trade agreement concluded between Canada, ], and the United States that succeeded the ] (NAFTA).<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/29/business/economy/trump-signs-usmca-new-nafta-into-law.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage|title=Trump Signs Trade Deal With Canada and Mexico|work=]|date=January 29, 2020}}</ref> The agreement has been characterized as "NAFTA 2.0",<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/12/10/usmca-is-finally-done-deal-after-democrats-sign-off-heres-what-is-it/|title=The USMCA is finally done. Here's what is in it.|first=Heather|last=Long |newspaper=Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/nafta-2-0-what-to-know|title=NAFTA 2.0: What to know|first=Brittany De|last=Lea|date=November 30, 2018|website=FOXBusiness}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/strikes-at-low-wage-plants-signal-revival-of-labor-demands-in-mexico-11550087620|title=Strikes at Low-Wage Plants Signal Revival of Labor Demands in Mexico|first=Juan|last=Montes|newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 13, 2019|via=www.wsj.com}}</ref> or "New NAFTA",<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Swanson|first1=Ana|last2=Tankersley|first2=Jim|date=January 29, 2020|title=Trump Just Signed the U.S.M.C.A. Here's What's in the New NAFTA.|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/29/business/economy/usmca-deal.html|access-date=July 2, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=July 1, 2020|title=Under USMCA, Canada rolls with 'new NAFTA'|url=https://www.freightwaves.com/news/under-usmca-canada-rolls-with-new-nafta|access-date=July 2, 2020|website=FreightWaves|language=en-US}}</ref> since many provisions from NAFTA were incorporated and its changes were seen as largely incremental. On July 1, 2020, the USMCA entered into force in all member states.

In June 2018, after Trudeau explained that Canadians would not be "pushed around" by the ] on Canada's aluminum and steel, Trump labeled Trudeau as "dishonest" and "meek", and accused Trudeau of making "false statements", although it is unclear which statements Trump was referring to. Trump's adviser on trade, ], said that there was a "special place in hell" for Trudeau as he employed "bad faith diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump and then tried to stab him in the back on the way out the door ... that comes right from ]."<ref>{{cite web |title='Very dishonest & weak': Trump lashes out at Trudeau following G7 summit |url=http://www.thejournal.ie/g7-trump-4062794-Jun2018/ |website=] |date=June 10, 2018 |publisher=] |access-date=June 10, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Watkins |first1=Eli |title=Trump's top economic aide on Trudeau: 'It was a betrayal' |date=June 10, 2018 |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/10/politics/larry-kudlow-donald-trump-justin-trudeau/index.html |publisher=] |access-date=June 13, 2018}}</ref> Days later, Trump said that Trudeau's comments are "going to cost a lot of money for the people of Canada".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Dangerfield |first1=Katie |title=Donald Trump slams Trudeau (again), says PM will cost Canadians a lot of money |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4268418/donald-trump-justin-trudeau-cost-canada-money/ |publisher=] |access-date=June 13, 2018}}</ref>

In June 2019, the U.S. State Department spokesperson ] said the U.S. "view Canada's claim that the waters of the Northwest Passage are internal waters of Canada as inconsistent with international law".<ref>{{cite news |title=The US is picking a fight with Canada over a thawing Arctic shipping route |url=https://qz.com/1653831/the-us-is-picking-a-fight-with-canada-over-an-arctic-shipping-route/ |work=Quartz |date=June 27, 2019}}</ref>

=== Justin Trudeau and Joe Biden (January 2021 – January 2025) ===
] and Prime Minister ], March 2023]]
Following the victory of ] in the ], Trudeau congratulated him on his victory; indicating a significant improvement in Canada–U.S. relationships, which had been strained in the years prior during the ].

On January 22, 2021, Biden and Trudeau held their first phone call. Trudeau was the first foreign leader to receive a phone call from Biden as President.<ref>{{cite web |title=Readout of President Joe Biden Call with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/22/readout-of-president-joe-biden-call-with-prime-minister-justin-trudeau-of-canada// |website=The White House |date=January 22, 2021}}</ref>

On February 23, 2021, Biden and Trudeau held their first bilateral meeting. Although virtual, the bilateral meeting was Biden's first as President. The two leaders discussed "COVID-19, economic recovery, climate change, and refugees and migration" among other subjects.<ref>{{cite web |title=Remarks by President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada Before Virtual Bilateral Meeting |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/23/remarks-by-president-biden-and-prime-minister-trudeau-of-canada-before-virtual-bilateral-meeting/ |website=The White House |date=February 23, 2021}}</ref>

=== Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump ''(starting in January 2025 - March/April 2025)'' ===
The months leading up to Trump's second presidency were marked by escalating trade disputes and remarks about ]. Which has caused Canadians to grow wary of America.

On November 29, 2024, Trudeau met with Trump to discuss trade relations, following Trump's threat to impose a ] and his intention to renegotiate or dismantle the USMCA.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Vaillancourt |first=William |title=Donald Trump Dines With Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago After Tariff Threat |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-dines-with-justin-trudeau-at-mar-a-lago-after-tariff-threat |work=The Daily Beast |date=2024-11-29 |access-date=2024-12-03}}</ref> Trudeau stated he would retaliate if Trump implemented tariffs on Canadian goods.<ref name=":1" /> Trump responded with public remarks about annexing Canada as a 51st state.<ref name=":2" /> This provoked a wide range of reactions from Canadians, with government officials first interpreting it as a joke.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2024-12-03 |title=Trump's apparent joke about Canada becoming 51st state draws range of reaction in B.C. |url=https://bc.ctvnews.ca/trump-s-apparent-joke-about-canada-becoming-51st-state-draws-range-of-reaction-in-b-c-1.7132877 |access-date=2024-12-10 |website=British Columbia |language=en}}</ref>

Trump expanded on his remarks throughout December 2024, referring to Canada as a state and Trudeau as a governor on several occasions.<ref name=":1">{{cite news |title=Trudeau says Americans are realizing Trump's tariffs on Canada would make life a lot more expensive |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trudeau-americans-realizing-trumps-tariffs-canada-make-life-116621582 |agency=ABC News |date=10 December 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Panetta |first=Alexander |date=December 17, 2024 |title=Trump trash talks Freeland in blast from her political past |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-freeland-post-1.7412270 |access-date=December 17, 2024 |work=CBC News}}</ref> On December 18, Trump repeated his remarks, stating on ]:<blockquote>Many Canadians want Canada to become the 51st State. They would save massively on taxes and military protection. I think it is a great idea. 51st State!!!</blockquote>Former ] ] called Trump's statement a "wake up call," stating, "For too long, we have been complacent in our relationships with the United States and the rest of the world. We need to unite and rise to this historic occasion to shape the future of Canada."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-12-18 |title=Donald Trump says Canada becoming 51st U.S. state is 'a great idea.' Jean Charest calls the comment a 'wake-up call' |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/donald-trump-says-canada-becoming-51st-u-s-state-a-great-idea-1.7149805 |access-date=2024-12-18 |website=CTVNews |language=en}}</ref>

After Trudeau ] on January 6, 2025, Trump stated, <blockquote>If Canada merged with the U.S. there would be no Tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be TOTALLY SECURE from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them. Together, what a great Nation it would be!!!<ref>{{Cite web |last=Crawley |first=Mike |date=January 6, 2025 |title=Trump responds to Trudeau resignation by suggesting Canada merge with U.S. |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-resigns-us-donald-trump-tariffs-1.7423756 |access-date=January 7, 2025 |website=CBC News}}</ref></blockquote>On January 7, Trump stated he would use economic force to coerce Canada into annexation.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 7, 2025 |title=Trump says he would use 'economic force' on Canada, not military |url=https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6606715 |website=CBC News}}</ref> The same day, Trudeau responded, "There isn't a snowball's chance in hell Canada would become part of the United States."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Trudeau says 'not a snowball's chance in hell' Canada will join US |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gzn4xx0q2o |access-date=2025-01-08 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title="Oh Canada": Donald Trump Shares New US Map Amid Controversy |url=https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/oh-canada-donald-trumps-new-map-shows-canada-as-part-of-us-7424666 |website=www.ndtv.com |language=en}}</ref>

== Military and security ==
The ], like forces of other NATO countries, fought in cooperation with the United States in most major conflicts since ], including the ], the ], the ], and most recently the ]. The main exceptions to this were the Canadian government's opposition to some ], the ], and the ], which caused some brief diplomatic tensions.<ref name="Massie 2019 pp. 575–594" /><ref name="Mingst Karns 2019 p. 63">{{cite book | last1=Mingst | first1=K. | last2=Karns | first2=M.P. | title=The United Nations In The Post-cold War Era, Second Edition | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2019 | isbn=978-1-000-30674-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kk2fDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT63| page=63}}</ref> Despite these issues, military relations have remained close.<ref name="Massie 2019 pp. 575–594" />
]
American defense arrangements with Canada are more extensive than with any other country.<ref>, U.S. State Department</ref> The ], established in 1940, provides policy-level consultation on bilateral defense matters. The United States and Canada share ] (NATO) mutual security commitments. In addition, American and Canadian military forces have cooperated since 1958 on continental air defense within the framework of the ] (NORAD). Canadian forces have provided indirect support for the American invasion of Iraq that began in 2003.<ref>{{cite book|first=Patrick|last=Lennox|title=At Home and Abroad: Canada–US Relationship and Canada's Place in the World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EiHkgmCcxicC&pg=PA107|year=2009|publisher=UBC Press|page=107|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780774859073}}</ref> Moreover, interoperability with the American armed forces has been a guiding principle of Canadian military force structuring and doctrine since the end of the Cold War. Canadian navy frigates, for instance, integrate seamlessly into American carrier battle groups.<ref>{{cite book|author=Canadian Peace Research Institute|title=Peace Research|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y34dAQAAMAAJ|year=2006|publisher=Canadian Peace Research and Education Association|access-date=November 6, 2015}} vol 38 page 8</ref>

In commemoration of the 200th Anniversary of the War of 1812 ambassadors from Canada and the United States, and naval officers from both countries gathered at the ] on August 17, 2012, for a panel discussion on Canada-U.S. relations with emphasis on national security-related matters. Also as part of the commemoration, the navies of both countries sailed together throughout the Great Lakes region.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130704070904/https://www.pritzkermilitarylibrary.org/Home/Ties-That-Bind.aspx |date=July 4, 2013 }} "Ties That Bind" at the ] on August 17, 2012</ref>

According to Canadian and U.S. officials, a U.S. fighter jet shot down an unidentified object over Canada on February 23, 2023, on the orders of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The operation was coordinated by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), a joint U.S.-Canadian air defense organization. Prime Minister Trudeau said investigators were looking for debris. This decision was made following the conversation between Biden and Trudeau.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Romero |first1=Dennis |last2=Alba |first2=Monica |title=U.S. shoots down the unidentified object in Canadian airspace |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trudeau-ordered-takedown-unidentified-object-canadian-airspace-speakin-rcna70261 |website=nbcnews|date=February 12, 2023 }}</ref>

The foreign policies of the countries have been closely aligned, yet ultimately independent, since the ].<ref>See Congressional Research Service. ''Canada–U.S. Relations'' (Congressional Research Service, 2021) , by an agency of the U.S. Congress; Updated February 10, 2021.</ref> There is also debate on whether the ] is in international waters or under Canadian sovereignty.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Canada and the Arctic: The Issue of Northern Sovereignty {{!}} Wilson Center |url=https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/canada-and-the-arctic-the-issue-northern-sovereignty |access-date=2023-09-07 |website=www.wilsoncenter.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pharand |first=Donat |date=1989 |title=Canada's Sovereignty Over the Northwest Passage |url=https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/mjil/article/1737/&path_info= |journal=Michigan Journal of International Law |volume=10 |issue=2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=says |first=Teknoloji Alemi |date=2020-04-08 |title=The U.S. - Canada Northwest Passage Dispute |url=https://brownpoliticalreview.org/2020/04/the-u-s-canada-northwest-passage-dispute/ |access-date=2023-09-07 |website=Brown Political Review |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Herrmann |first=Thomas |date=June 27, 2019 |title=Shipping Through the Northwest Passage: A Policy Brief |url=https://jsis.washington.edu/news/shipping-through-the-northwest-passage-a-policy-brief/ |access-date=September 7, 2023 |website=University of Washington}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rothwell |first=Donald R. |date=1993 |title=The Canadian-U.S. Northwest Passage Dispute: A Reassessment |url=https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1309&context=cilj |journal=Cornell International Law Journal |volume=26 |issue=2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Charron |first=Andrea |date=2005 |title=The Northwest Passage: Is Canada's Sovereignty Floating Away? |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40204066 |journal=International Journal |volume=60 |issue=3 |pages=831–848 |doi=10.2307/40204066 |issn=0020-7020 |jstor=40204066}}</ref>

=== Iran hostage crisis ===
{{main article|Canadian Caper}}
During the 1979 revolution, protesters invaded the U.S. embassy and took many hostages. Six Americans evaded capture and were sheltered by the British and Canadian diplomatic missions. After a U.S. military operation to get them out of Iran failed,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/winter99-00/art1.html |title=A Classic Case of Deception — Central Intelligence Agency |website=www.cia.gov |access-date=September 24, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130219204103/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/winter99-00/art1.html |archive-date=February 19, 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Canadian diplomat ], ] ], and ] ] decided to smuggle the six Americans out of Iran on an international flight by using ]s. An ] was made to issue multiple official copies of Canadian passports with fake identities to the American diplomats in the Canadian sanctuary. The passports contained forged Iranian ] prepared by the U.S. ].<ref name="Windsor Star 1981">
{{cite news
| last = Gervais
| first = Marty
| title = Iran Rescue: Our Bashful Heroes
| newspaper = ]
| date = March 28, 1981
| page = C8
| url = https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=1ttYAAAAIBAJ&pg=1072,3794740
| access-date = February 24, 2013
}}
</ref>

=== War in Afghanistan ===
{{Main|Canada's role in the invasion of Afghanistan}}
] soldiers gather to commemorate the 65th anniversary of ] in ], Afghanistan. The 1st Special Service Force was an American-Canadian unit during World War II.]]
Canada's elite ] unit joined ] in Afghanistan shortly after the ]. Canadian forces joined the multinational coalition in ] in January 2002. On April 18, 2002, an American pilot ], killing four and wounding eight Canadians. A joint American-Canadian inquiry determined the cause of the incident to be pilot error, in which the pilot interpreted ground fire as an attack; the pilot ignored orders that he felt were "second-guessing" his field tactical decision.<ref name="friendly fire cbc">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-friendly-fire-pilot-won-t-face-court-martial-1.479996|title=U.S. 'friendly fire' pilot won't face court martial|publisher=CBC News|date=July 6, 2004|access-date=January 28, 2004}}</ref><ref name="friendly fire bbc">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2073024.stm|title=Pilots blamed for 'friendly fire' deaths|work=BBC News|date=August 22, 2002|access-date=January 28, 2007}}</ref> Canadian forces assumed a six-month command rotation of the ] in 2003; in 2005, Canadians assumed operational command of the multi-national Brigade in ], with 2,300 troops, and supervises the ] in Kandahar, where al-Qaida forces are most active. Canada has also deployed naval forces in the Persian Gulf since 1991 in support of the UN Gulf Multinational Interdiction Force.<ref name=" Canada navy in gulf">{{cite web|url=http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/focus/canada-us/backgrounder_e.asp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070405221038/http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/focus/canada-us/backgrounder_e.asp |archive-date=April 5, 2007|title=CANADIAN NAVY TEAMS UP WITH U.S. CARRIER BATTLE GROUPS|publisher=Department of National Defence|date=September 25, 2006|access-date=January 28, 2007}}</ref>

The ] maintains a public relations website named , which is intended "to give American citizens a better sense of the scope of Canada's role in North American and Global Security and the War on Terror".

The ] and some recent Liberal leadership candidates have expressed opposition to Canada's expanded role in the Afghan conflict because it is inconsistent with Canada's historic role (since the Second World War) of peacekeeping operations.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Wayne S.|last1=Cox|first2=Bruno|last2=Charbonneau|title=Locating Global Order: American Power and Canadian Security After 9/11|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ESyG4mAgcRMC&pg=PA119|year=2010|publisher=UBC Press|page=119|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780774859660}}</ref>

=== 2003 Invasion of Iraq ===
{{See also|Canada and the Iraq War|Canada and Iraq War resisters}}
According to contemporary polls, 71% of Canadians were opposed to the ].<ref name=Harper>{{Cite news| last=Harper| first=Tim| title=Canadians back Chrétien on war, poll finds| newspaper=Toronto Star| date=March 22, 2003| url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/articles/torstar-24-03-2003c.html| access-date=January 12, 2009}}</ref> Many Canadians, and the former Liberal ] headed by ] (as well as many Americans such as ] and ]),<ref name="clinton canada">{{cite news|title=Clinton speaks on Afghanistan, and Canada listens|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/clinton-speaks-on-afghanistan-and-canada-listens/article732939/|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|last=Spector|first=Norman|date=November 20, 2006|access-date=January 28, 2007}}</ref> made a policy distinction between conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, unlike the ], which linked these together in a "Global war on terror".

=== Responding to ISIS/Daesh ===
{{Main|International military intervention against ISIL}}
] meets with U.S. Secretary of Defense ] at ] in 2016]]
Canada has been involved in international responses to the threats from ] in ] and ] and is a member of the Global Coalition to Counter Daesh. In October 2016, Foreign Affairs Minister Dion and National Defence Minister Sajjan met the U.S. special envoy for this coalition. The Americans thanked Canada "for the role of Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) in providing training and assistance to Iraqi security forces, as well as the CAF's role in improving essential capacity-building capabilities with regional forces".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do;jsessionid=f30b3f0d2b6b7640fe0f7ba037412537907c8ea2294e1710ff909baa19cec01e.e38RbhaLb3qNe3eMahz0?mthd=advSrch&crtr.page=1&crtr.dpt1D=6673&nid=1134179|title=Ministers Dion and Sajjan meet U.S. special envoy for Global Coalition to Counter ISIL|date=October 6, 2016|publisher=Global Affairs Canada|access-date=October 10, 2016|archive-date=October 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010220834/http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do;jsessionid=f30b3f0d2b6b7640fe0f7ba037412537907c8ea2294e1710ff909baa19cec01e.e38RbhaLb3qNe3eMahz0?mthd=advSrch&crtr.page=1&crtr.dpt1D=6673&nid=1134179|url-status=dead}}</ref>

=== Illicit drugs ===
{{main|Drug policy of the United States|Drug policy of Canada}}
In 2003, the American government became concerned when members of the Canadian government announced plans to decriminalize the use of ]. David Murray, an assistant to the U.S. ] ], said in a ] interview that, "We would have to respond. We would be forced to respond."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/u-s-warns-canada-against-easing-pot-laws-1.393091 |title=U.S. warns Canada against easing pot laws |publisher=Cbc.ca |date=May 2, 2003 |access-date=February 26, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090324005525/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2003/05/02/us_pot_rxn030502.html |archive-date=March 24, 2009 }}</ref> However, the ] of the ] in early 2006 halted the liberalization of cannabis laws until the ] legalized recreational cannabis use in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Canada|first=Health|date=January 23, 2020|title=Cannabis laws and regulations|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/laws-regulations.html|access-date=March 13, 2021|website=aem}}</ref>

A 2007 joint report by American and Canadian officials on cross-border drug smuggling indicated that, despite their best efforts, "drug trafficking still occurs in significant quantities in both directions across the border. The principal illicit substances smuggled across our shared border are ] (''Ecstasy''), ], and cannabis"<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://etacanadaonline.com/ |title = ETA Canada Visa Application - Apply for Canadian E-Visa Online}}</ref> The report indicated that Canada was a major producer of ''Ecstasy'' and marijuana for the U.S. market, while the U.S. was a transit country for cocaine entering Canada.

== Trade ==
{{Main|Canada–United States trade relations}}
] in Vancouver. ] exist between the two countries.]]
Canada and the United States have the world's second-largest trading relationship, with huge quantities of goods and people flowing across the border each year. Since the 1987 ], there have been no ]s on most goods passed between the two countries.

In the course of the ], the U.S. has placed tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber because of what it argues is an unfair Canadian government subsidy, a claim that Canada disputes. The dispute has cycled through several agreements and arbitration cases. Other notable disputes include the ], and ] in cultural industries such as magazines, radio, and television. Canadians have been criticized about such things as the ban on beef since a case of ] was discovered in 2003 in cows from the United States (and a few subsequent cases) and the high American agricultural subsidies. Concerns in Canada also run high over aspects of the ] (NAFTA) such as Chapter 11,<ref>{{cite book|first=Eric|last=Miller|title=The Outlier Sectors: Areas of Non-free Trade in the North American Free Trade Agreement|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fwit1QwswY0C&pg=PA19|year=2002|publisher=BID-INTAL|page=19|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9789507381287}}</ref> prior to its suspension and replacement with USMCA.<ref name=":0" />

== Cultural relations ==
{{See also|North America#Culture}}

=== Sports ===
{{See also|Canada–United States sports rivalries|Major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada}}
Several major sports that are popular in the United States have origins in or influences from Canada, such as basketball, which was invented by Canadian-American ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Giddens |first=David |title=How Canada invented ‘American’ football, baseball, basketball and hockey |url=https://www.cbc.ca/sportslongform/entry/how-canada-invented-american-football-baseball-basketball-and-hockey |work=CBC Sports}}</ref>

== Environmental issues ==
] at the signing ceremony for the ] in 1972]]
A principal instrument of this cooperation is the ] (IJC), established as part of the ] to resolve differences and promote international cooperation on boundary waters. The ] of 1972 is another historic example of cooperation in controlling trans-border water pollution.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ottawa.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=environment|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527153939/http://ottawa.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=environment |archive-date=May 27, 2010|title=The Embassy of the U.S.A., Ottawa – United States – Canada Relations|author=GMcKeating|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> However, there have been some disputes. Most recently, the ] Outlet, a project instituted by North Dakota, has angered Manitobans who fear that their water may soon become polluted as a result of this project.

Beginning in 1986, the Canadian government of Brian Mulroney began pressing the Reagan administration for an "Acid Rain Treaty" to do something about U.S. industrial air pollution causing acid rain in Canada. The Reagan administration was hesitant and questioned the science behind Mulroney's claims. However, Mulroney was able to prevail. The product was the signing and ratification of the ] of 1991 by the first Bush administration. Under that treaty, the two governments consult semi-annually on trans-border air pollution, which has demonstrably reduced acid rain, and they have since signed an annex to the treaty dealing with ground level ozone in 2000.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.epa.gov/airmarkt/progsregs/usca/index.htm|title=Clean Air Markets|access-date=April 27, 2016|date=August 12, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ec.gc.ca/air/default.asp?lang=En&n=83930AC3-1|title=Environment and Climate Change Canada – Air – Canada- United States Air Quality Agreement|access-date=April 27, 2016|date=January 25, 2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/exclusive-interview-brian-mulroney-remembers-his-friend-ronald-reagan|title=Exclusive Interview: Brian Mulroney remembers his friend Ronald Reagan|website=News.nationalpost.com|date=February 4, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-04-06-mn-139-story.html | work=Los Angeles Times | first1=Kenneth | last1=Freed | first2=James | last2=Gerstenzang | date=April 6, 1987 | title=Mulroney Asks Reagan for Treaty on Acid Rain}}</ref> Despite this, trans-border air pollution remains an issue, particularly in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence watershed during the summer. The main source of this trans-border pollution results from coal-fired power stations, most of them located in the ].<ref>{{cite book|first1=Edward S.|last1=Cassedy|first2=Peter Z.|last2=Grossman|title=Introduction to Energy: Resources, Technology, and Society|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j3cf97Wt07MC&pg=PA157|year=1998|publisher=Cambridge U.P.|page=157|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780521637671}}</ref> As part of the negotiations to create ], Canada and the U.S. signed, along with Mexico, the ] that created the ] that monitors environmental issues across the continent, publishing the ] as one aspect of its monitoring duties.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=1226&SiteNodeID=310&BL_ExpandID=154|title=COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION|access-date=April 27, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150511004728/http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=1226&SiteNodeID=310&BL_ExpandID=154|archive-date=May 11, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>

Currently, neither of the countries' governments support the ], which set out time scheduled curbing of greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike the United States, Canada has ratified the agreement. Yet after ratification, due to internal political conflict within Canada, the Canadian government does not enforce the ] and has received criticism from environmental groups and other governments for its climate change positions. In January 2011, the ], ], explicitly stated that the policy of his government about greenhouse gas emissions reductions is to wait for the United States to act first, and then try to harmonize with that action – a position that has been condemned by environmentalists and Canadian nationalists, and as well as scientists and government think-tanks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://money.canoe.ca/money/business/canada/archives/2011/01/20110128-152706.html|archive-url=https://archive.today/20110706171230/http://money.canoe.ca/money/business/canada/archives/2011/01/20110128-152706.html |archive-date=July 6, 2011|title=Canada's environment policy to follow the U.S.: Minister|url-status=usurped|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.climateprosperity.ca/eng/studies/canada-us/report/media-release-canada-us-report-eng.php|title=Resources – Climate Prosperity|access-date=April 27, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706173124/http://www.climateprosperity.ca/eng/studies/canada-us/report/media-release-canada-us-report-eng.php|archive-date=July 6, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref>

With large ] and long-term concern about water scarcity in ], ] availability or restriction has been identified as an issue of possible future contention between the countries.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Montgomery |first1=Marc |title=Canada has water, the U.S wants it. |url=https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2015/10/01/canada-has-water-the-u-s-wants-it/ |access-date=April 4, 2022 |work=RCI English |agency=Radio Canada International |date=October 1, 2015}}</ref>

=== Newfoundland fisheries dispute ===
The United States and Britain had a long-standing dispute about the rights of Americans fishing in the waters near Newfoundland.<ref>{{cite book|last=Michael Rheta Martin|title=Dictionary of American History: With the Complete Text of the Constitution of the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aqG-B4jsMIAC&pg=PA227|year=1978|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|page=227|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780822601241}}</ref> Before 1776, there was no question that American fishermen, mostly from Massachusetts, had rights to use the waters off Newfoundland. In the peace treaty negotiations of 1783, the Americans insisted on a statement of these rights. However, France, an American ally, disputed the American position because France had its own specified rights in the area and wanted them to be exclusive.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Murphy |first1=Orville T. |year=1965 |title=The Comte De Vergennes, The Newfoundland Fisheries And The Peace Negotiation Of 1783: A Reconsideration |journal=Canadian Historical Review |volume=46 |issue=1|pages=32–46 |doi=10.3138/chr-046-01-02|s2cid=143808239 }}</ref> The ] gave the Americans not rights, but rather "liberties" to fish within the territorial waters of British North America and to dry fish on certain coasts.

After the War of 1812, the Convention of 1818 between the United States and Britain specified exactly what liberties were involved.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Golladay |first1=V. Dennis |year=1973 |title=The United States and British North American Fisheries, 1815–1818 |journal=American Neptune |volume=33 |issue=4|pages=246–257}}</ref> Canadian and Newfoundland fishermen contested these liberties in the 1830s and 1840s. The ] of 1854, and the ] spelled out the liberties in more detail. However the Treaty of Washington expired in 1885, and there was a continuous round of disputes over jurisdictions and liberties. Britain and the United States sent the issue to the ] in The Hague in 1909. It produced a compromise settlement that permanently ended the problems.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Alvin |first1=C. Gluek Jr |year=1976 |title=Programmed Diplomacy: The Settlement of the North Atlantic Fisheries Question, 1907–12 |journal=Acadiensis |volume=6 |issue=1|pages=43–70 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Kurkpatrick Dorsey|title=The Dawn of Conservation Diplomacy: U.S.-Canadian wildlife protection treaties in the progressive era|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hwqSUGLTRsgC&pg=PA19|year=2009|publisher=University of Washington Press|page=19ff|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780295989792}}</ref>

== Common memberships ==
Canada and the United States both hold membership in several multinational organizations, including:
{{col div}}
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] (CHL)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ] (IIHF)
* ] * ] (IMF)
* ] (IOC)
* ] * ]
* ] (MLB)
* ]
* ] (MLS)
* ]
* ] (NBA)
* ] (NHL)
* ] (NLL)
* ] (NAFTA)
* ] (NORAD)
* ] * ]
* ] * ] (NATO)
* ] * ]
* ] * ] (OECD)
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ] (UN)
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ] (WHO)
* ] (WTO)
* ] * ]
* ]
{{col div end}}


== Territorial disputes ==
==The current state of relations==
{{See also|List of areas disputed by Canada and the United States}}
]
]. The waters around the island are one of several maritime territorial disputes between the two countries.]]
Shortly after being congratulated by U.S. President ] for his victory in February 2006, Prime Minister of Canada, ] rebuked U.S. Ambassador to Canada ] for criticizing the ] plans to assert Canada's sovereignty over the ] waters with armed forces. Harper's first meeting with the U.S. President occurred at the end of March 2006; and while little was achieved in the way of solid agreements, the trip was described in the media as signaling a trend of closer relations between the two nations.
The two countries have had several territorial disputes throughout their histories. Current maritime territorial disputes between the two countries include the ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Additionally, the United States is one of several countries that contends the ] is international waters; whereas the Canadian government asserts it forms ]. The ] is also disputed as international waters by the United States.


Historical boundary disputes include the ] at the ]–] border; the ] at the present day ]–] border; and the ] at the Alaska–British Columbia border. The Maine–New Brunswick boundary dispute was resolved through the ] in 1842, the Oregon boundary dispute through the ] of 1846, and the Alaska boundary dispute through arbitration in 1903.
Prime Minister Harper called and congratulated the then President-elect, ], on his victory over John McCain, and he assured the President-elect that the two countries will become the greatest of allies. After he was inaugurated, on January 20, 2009, as President of the United States, it was announced that Mr. Obama's first international trip would be to Canada, which took place on February 19, 2009.<ref>http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090128/canada_obama_090128/20090128?hub=Politics</ref>


=== Northwest Passage ===
==Quotations==
]]]
*] ]: "Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder."<ref> John F. Kennedy. ''''. The American Presidency Project.</ref>
A long-simmering dispute between Canada and the U.S. involves the issue of Canadian sovereignty over the ] (the sea passages in the ]). Canada's assertion that the Northwest Passage represents internal (territorial) waters has been challenged by other countries, especially the U.S., which argue that these waters constitute an ]. Canadians were alarmed when Americans drove the reinforced oil tanker {{SS|Manhattan|1962|2}} through the Northwest Passage in 1969, followed by the icebreaker ] in 1985, which resulted in a ]. In 1970, the Canadian parliament enacted the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, which asserts Canadian regulatory control over pollution within a 100-mile zone. In response, the United States in 1970 stated, "We cannot accept the assertion of a Canadian claim that the Arctic waters are internal waters of Canada. ... Such acceptance would jeopardize the freedom of navigation essential for United States naval activities worldwide." A compromise of sorts was reached in 1988, by an agreement on "Arctic Cooperation", which pledges that voyages of American icebreakers "will be undertaken with the consent of the Government of Canada". However, the agreement did not alter either country's basic legal position. ], the American ambassador to Canada, in 2005 suggested to Washington that it should recognize the straits as belonging to Canada. His advice was rejected and Harper took opposite positions. The U.S. opposes Harper's proposed plan to deploy military icebreakers in the Arctic to detect interlopers and assert Canadian sovereignty over those waters.<ref>Matthew Carnaghan, Allison Goody, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120304003939/http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb0561-e.htm |date=March 4, 2012 }} (Library of Parliament: Political and Social Affairs Division, January 26, 2006); </ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/20070817/qp_cellucci_070819/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110222190522/http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/20070817/qp_cellucci_070819/ |archive-date=February 22, 2011 |title=Cellucci: Canada should control Northwest Passage |publisher=CTV.ca |url-status=dead|access-date=February 26, 2011}}</ref>


== Views of presidents and prime ministers ==
* ] ] once remarked that Canada being America's neighbor "is like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast, if one can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."<ref>From a speech by Trudeau to the ] in ], on March 25, 1969; authorship of the speech was later attributed to ], Trudeau's adviser. (It should be noted, as well, that Trudeau's quote is commonly, although incorrectly, remembered as casting Canada as a ]; this was in fact the creation of an ] that followed Trudeau's speech.)</ref>
Presidents and prime ministers typically make formal or informal statements that indicate the diplomatic policy of their administration. Diplomats and journalists at the time—and historians since—dissect the nuances and tone to detect the warmth or coolness of the relationship.
* Prime Minister ], speaking at the beginning of the ] (fought mostly over ]), arguing against closer trade relations with the U.S. stated "As for myself, my course is clear. A ] I was born—a British subject I will die. With my utmost effort, with my latest breath, will I oppose the 'veiled treason' which attempts by sordid means and mercenary proffers to lure our people from their allegiance." (February 3, 1891.<ref>Histor!ca {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080406092452/http://www.histori.ca/prodev/article.do%3Bjsessionid%3D8D3831D48EE489EBCF46813C8427E685.tomcat1?id=15356 |date=April 6, 2008 }}, James Marsh.</ref>)


Canada's first Prime Minister also said:
* Prime Minister ]: "These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence." - made during sensitive trade talks with US in 1893.<ref> Donald Grant Creighton and P. B. Waite, ''John A. Macdonald: The Young Politician, the Old Chieftain'' (1998) p. 497</ref>
{{blockquote|It has been said that the United States Government is a failure. I don't go so far. On the contrary, I consider it a marvelous exhibition of human wisdom. It was as perfect as human wisdom could make it, and under it, the American States greatly prospered until very recently, but being the work of men it had its defects, and it is for us to take advantage by experience, and endeavor to see if we cannot arrive by careful study at such a plan as will avoid the mistakes of our neighbors. In the first place, we know that every individual state was an individual sovereign—that each had its own army and navy and political organization – and when they formed themselves into a confederation they only gave the central authority certain specific rights appertaining to sovereign powers. The dangers that have risen from this system we will avoid if we can agree upon forming a strong central government—a great Central Legislature—a constitution for a Union which will have all the rights of sovereignty except those that are given to the local governments. Then we shall have taken a great step in advance of the American Republic. (September 12, 1864)}}
* Prime Minister ], angry at failed trade talks in 1888, privately complained to his wife, ], that "These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence."<ref>Donald Creighton, ''John A. Macdonald: The Old Chieftain'' (1955) p. 497</ref>
* After World War II years of close military and economic cooperation, President ] said in 1947 that "Canada and the United States have reached the point where we can no longer think of each other as 'foreign' countries."<ref>Council on Foreign Relations, ''Documents on American foreign relations'' (1957) Volume 9 p 558</ref>
* President ] told Parliament in Ottawa in May 1961 that "Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder."<ref>John F. Kennedy. ''''. The American Presidency Project.</ref>
* President ] helped open Expo '67 with an upbeat theme, saying "We of the United States consider ourselves blessed. We have much to give thanks for. But the gift of providence we cherish most is that we were given as our neighbors on this wonderful continent the people and the nation of Canada." Remarks at ], Montreal, May 25, 1967.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=quotes|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090323143657/http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=quotes |archive-date=March 23, 2009 |title=The Embassy of the U.S.A., Ottawa – United States – Canada Relations |publisher=Canada.usembassy.gov |access-date=February 26, 2011}}</ref>


{{listen | help = no | pos = right| filename = Trudeau sleeping with an elephant.ogg | title = Trudeau Washington Press Club speech | description = Trudeau's famous "sleeping with an elephant" quotation | format = ]}}
* Prime Minister ], speaking at the beginning of the ] (fought mostly over ]), Macdonald said: "As for myself, my course is clear. A ] I was born—a British subject I will die. With my utmost effort, with my latest breath, will I oppose the ‘veiled treason’ which attempts by sordid means and mercenary proffers to lure our people from their allegiance." - , Feb 3, 1891.<ref>Histor!ca , James Marsh.</ref>
* Prime Minister ] famously said that being America's neighbor "is like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast, if one can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."<ref>From a speech by Trudeau to the ] in ], on March 25, 1969</ref><ref>J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, ''Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy'' (1991) p. 51</ref>
* Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, sharply at odds with the U.S. over Cold War policy, warned at a press conference in 1971 that the overwhelming American presence posed "a danger to our national identity from a cultural, economic and perhaps even military point of view."<ref>J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, ''Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy'' (1991) p. 195</ref>
* President ], in a speech to Parliament in 1972 was angry at Trudeau and declared that the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States was dead. "It is time for us to recognize", he stated, "that we have very separate identities; that we have significant differences; and that nobody's interests are furthered when these realities are obscured."<ref>J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, ''Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy'' (1991) p. 71</ref>
* In late 2001, President ] did not mention Canada during a speech in which he thanked a list of countries who had assisted in responding to the events of ], although Canada had provided military, financial, and other support.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/gwbush911jointsessionspeech.htm|title=The Rhetoric of 9/11: President George W. Bush – Address to Joint Session of Congress and the American People (9-20-01)|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> Ten years later, ], one of President Bush's speechwriters, stated that it was an unintentional omission.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/david-frum-why-bush-didnt-mention-canada-in-his-920-speech |title=David Frum: Why Bush didn't mention Canada in his 9/20 speech|last=Frum|first=David|newspaper=National Post|date=September 9, 2011|access-date=October 12, 2016}}</ref>
* Prime Minister ], in a statement congratulating ] on his inauguration, stated that "The United States remains Canada's most important ally, closest friend and largest trading partner and I look forward to working with President Obama and his administration as we build on this special relationship."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=3&id=2391|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100113232449/http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=3&id=2391 |archive-date=January 13, 2010|title=Statement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper|access-date=January 21, 2009|date=January 20, 2009|publisher=Office of the Prime Minister of Canada}}</ref>
* President Barack Obama, speaking in Ottawa at his first official international visit on February 19, 2009, said, "I love this country. We could not have a better friend and ally."<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51I7GY20090219 |work=Reuters |title=Obama declares love for Canada, banishes Bush era |date=February 19, 2009}}</ref>
* President Joe Biden, while addressing Parliament on March 24, 2023, emphasized the strong relationship between the two countries, stating, “Americans and Canadians are two people, two countries, in my view, sharing one heart, a personal connection. No two nations on Earth are bound by such close ties, friendship, family, commerce and culture." Biden additionally commented on Canada's sports culture, saying, "I have to say, I like your teams except the ]" which was met with laughter and applause.<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 24, 2023 |title=Remarks by President Biden in Address to the Canadian Parliament |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/03/24/remarks-by-president-biden-in-address-to-the-canadian-parliament/ |website=whitehouse.gov}}</ref>


== Public opinion ==
* President ]: "Canada and the United States have reached the point where we can no longer think of each other as foreign countries." <ref>United North America , Jonathan Wheelwright,</ref>
Today there remain cross-border cultural ties <ref>{{cite web|title=Canadians and Americans are more similar than assumed|url=http://news.ubc.ca/2011/07/07/canadians-and-americans-are-more-similar-than-assumed/|first=Basil|last=Waugh|date=July 7, 2011|website=News.ubc.ca|access-date=July 18, 2016|archive-date=September 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901215309/https://news.ubc.ca/2011/07/07/canadians-and-americans-are-more-similar-than-assumed/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canadians-and-americans-think-a-lot-alike|title=Canadians and Americans think a lot alike|encyclopedia=]|access-date=September 8, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=United North America|url=http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/simdiff.htm|website=Unitednorthamerica.org|access-date=July 18, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160725094714/http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/simdiff.htm|archive-date=July 25, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> and according to ]'s annual public opinion polls, Canada has consistently been Americans' favorite nation, with 96% of Americans viewing Canada favorably in 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/126116/Canada-Places-First-Image-Contest-Iran-Last.aspx |title=In U.S., Canada Places First in Image Contest; Iran Last |publisher=Gallup.com |date=February 19, 2010 |access-date=February 26, 2011}} published in 2010.</ref><ref> '']''</ref> As of spring 2013, 64% of Canadians had a favorable view of the U.S. and 81% expressed confidence in then-US President Obama to do the right thing in international matters. According to the same poll, 30% viewed the U.S. negatively.<ref>See Jacob Poushter and Bruce Drake, ''Pew research Center'' February 19, 2014</ref> In addition, according to Spring 2017 Global Attitudes Survey, 43% of Canadians view the U.S. positively, while 51% hold a negative view.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/27162930/PG_2017.06.26_US-Image-Report_Full-Report.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721075551/http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/27162930/PG_2017.06.26_US-Image-Report_Full-Report.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 21, 2017|title=US Image Report|date=June 26, 2017}}</ref> More recently, however, a poll in January 2018 showed Canadians' approval of U.S. leadership dropped by over 40 percentage points under President ], in line with the view of residents of many other U.S. allied and neutral countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.gallup.com/poll/225761/world-approval-leadership-drops-new-low.aspx |title=World's Approval of U.S. Leadership Drops to New Low |publisher=] |date=January 18, 2018 |access-date=August 18, 2018}}</ref> Since then, Canadian opinion of the U.S. has improved significantly, following an international rebound in the U.S. image abroad following the transition as ] from Donald Trump to ], with 61% of Canadians having a favorable opinion of the United States in 2021.<ref name="pewresearch.org">{{cite web | url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/06/10/americas-image-abroad-rebounds-with-transition-from-trump-to-biden/ | title=America's Image Abroad Rebounds with Transition from Trump to Biden | date=June 10, 2021 }}</ref>


=== Anti-Americanism ===
* Prime Minister ], speaking in the Soviet Union in 1971, said that the overwhelming American presence posed "a danger to our ] from a cultural, economic and perhaps even military point of view."<ref>J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, ''Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy''(1991) p 195</ref>
{{further|Anti-Americanism#Canada}}
Anti-Americanism in Canada has unique historic roots.<ref name="Anon. x583"/><ref name="Doran Sewell 1988 pp. 105–119"/> Since the arrival of the Loyalists as refugees from the American Revolution in the 1780s, historians have identified a constant theme of Canadian fear of the United States and of "]" or a cultural takeover. In the War of 1812, for example, the enthusiastic response by French militia to defend Lower Canada reflected, according to Heidler and Heidler (2004), "the fear of Americanization".<ref>David Stephen Heidler and Jeanne T. Heidler, ''Encyclopedia of the War of 1812'' (2004) p. 194</ref> Scholars have traced this attitude over time in Ontario and Quebec.<ref>J. L. Granatstein, ''Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism'' (1997)</ref>
] from "Dominion House", while ] watches in the background]]
Canadian intellectuals who wrote about the U.S. in the first half of the 20th century identified America as the world center of modernity and deplored it. Anti-American Canadians (who admired the British Empire) explained that Canada had narrowly escaped American conquest with its rejection of tradition, its worship of "progress" and technology, and its mass culture; they explained that Canada was much better because of its commitment to orderly government and societal harmony. There were a few ardent defenders of the nation to the south, notably liberal and socialist intellectuals such as ] and Jean-Charles Harvey (1891–1967).<ref>Damien-Claude Bélanger, ''Prejudice and Pride: Canadian Intellectuals Confront the United States, 1891–1945'' (University of Toronto Press, 2011), pp 16, 180</ref>


Looking at television, Collins (1990) finds that it is in Anglophone Canada that fear of cultural Americanization is most powerful, for there the attractions of the U.S. are strongest.<ref>Richard Collins, ''Culture, Communication, and National Identity: The Case of Canadian Television'' (U. of Toronto Press, 1990) p. 25</ref> Meren (2009) argues that after 1945, the emergence of Quebec nationalism and the desire to preserve French-Canadian cultural heritage led to growing anxiety regarding American cultural imperialism and Americanization.<ref>David Meren, "'Plus que jamais nécessaires': Cultural Relations, Nationalism and the State in Canada–Quebec–France Triangle, 1945–1960", ''Journal of the Canadian Historical Association'', 2009, Vol. 19 Issue 1, pp 279–305,</ref> In 2006 surveys showed that 60 percent of Québécois had a fear of Americanization, while other surveys showed they preferred their current situation to that of the Americans in the realms of health care, quality of life as seniors, environmental quality, poverty, educational system, racism and standard of living. While agreeing that job opportunities are greater in America, 89 percent disagreed with the notion that they would rather be in the United States, and they were more likely to feel closer to English Canadians than to Americans.<ref name="autogenerated114">Paula Ruth Gilbert, ''Violence and the Female Imagination: Quebec's Women Writers'' (2006) p. 114</ref> However, there is evidence that the elites and Quebec are much less fearful of Americanization and much more open to economic integration than the general public.<ref name="autogenerated114" />
* President ], during his visit to Ottawa in 1972, declared that the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States was dead. "It is time for us to recognize," he stated, "that we have very separate identities; that we have significant differences; and that nobody's interests are furthered when these realities are obscured."<ref>J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, ''Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy''(1991) p 71</ref>
]
The history has been traced in detail by a leading Canadian historian J.L. Granatstein in ''Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism'' (1997). Current studies report the phenomenon persists. Two scholars report, "Anti-Americanism is alive and well in Canada today, strengthened by, among other things, disputes related to NAFTA, American involvement in the Middle East, and the ever-increasing Americanization of Canadian culture."<ref>{{cite book |first1=Barbara S. |last1=Groseclose |first2=Jochen |last2=Wierich |title=Internationalizing the History of American Art: Views |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kXqgwtSEupQC&pg=PA105 |year=2009| publisher=Penn State Press |page=105 |access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=978-0271032009 }}</ref> ] writes, "More than anything else, Diefenbaker became the tragic victim of Canadian anti-Americanism, a sentiment the prime minister had fully embraced by 1962. unable to imagine himself (or his foreign policy) without enemies."<ref>{{cite book |first=Jamie |last=Glazov |title=Canadian Policy Toward Khrushchev's Soviet Union |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TRs_t6fhyX4C&pg=PA138 |year=2002 |publisher=McGill-Queens |page=138 |access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780773522763 }}</ref> Historian J. M. Bumsted says, "In its most extreme form, Canadian suspicion of the United States has led to outbreaks of overt anti-Americanism, usually spilling over against American residents in Canada."<ref>{{cite book|first=J. M.|last=Bumsted|editor-first=Paul|editor-last=Magocsi|title=Encyclopedia of Canada's Peoples|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dbUuX0mnvQMC&pg=PA197|year=1999|publisher=University of Toronto Press|page=197|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780802029386}}</ref> John R. Wennersten writes, "But at the heart of Canadian anti-Americanism lies a cultural bitterness that takes an American expatriate unaware. Canadians fear the American media's influence on their culture and talk critically about how Americans are exporting a culture of violence in its television programming and movies."<ref>{{cite book|first=John R.|last=Wennersten|title=Leaving America: The New Expatriate Generation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_FzYO9YV0CsC&pg=PA44|year=2008|publisher=Greenwood|page=44|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780313345067}}</ref> However Kim Nossal points out that the Canadian variety is much milder than anti-Americanism in some other countries.<ref>{{cite book|first=Brendon|last=O'Connor|title=Anti-Americanism: Comparative perspectives|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Jq4FMb47AnEC&pg=PA60|year=2007|publisher=Greenwood |page=60 |access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9781846450266}}</ref> By contrast, Americans show very little knowledge or interest one way or the other regarding Canadian affairs.<ref>{{cite book|first=Seymour Martin|last=Lipset|title=Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada|url=https://archive.org/details/continentaldivid00lips|url-access=registration|year=1990|publisher=Routledge|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780415903097}}</ref> Canadian historian ], quoting Canadian playwright ] summed it up: "Americans are benevolently ignorant about Canada, whereas Canadians are malevolently informed about the United States."<ref>{{cite book|first=Camille R.|last=La Bossière|title=Context North America: Canadian/U.S. Literary Relations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zwoWAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA11|year=1994|publisher=U. of Ottawa Press|page=11|access-date=November 6, 2015|isbn=9780776603605}}</ref>


=== Canadian public opinion on U.S. presidents ===
* The ] in a released statement congratulating Barack Obama on his inauguration said: "The United States remains Canada’s most important ally, closest friend and largest trading partner and I look forward to working with President Obama and his administration as we build on this special relationship."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=3&id=2391|title=Statemente by Prime Minister Stephen Harper|accessdate=2009-01-21|date=2009-01-20|publisher=Office of the Prime Minister of Canada}}</ref>
] in January 2017]]
United States President ] was "deeply disliked" by a majority of Canadians according to the ''Arizona Daily Sun''. A 2004 poll found that more than two-thirds of Canadians favored Democrat ] over Bush in the ], with Bush's lowest approval ratings in Canada being in the province of ] where just 11% of the population supported him.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://azdailysun.com/poll-deep-anti-bush-sentiment-in-canada/article_1c8749cf-9704-5e02-9c7c-159214c9a5f5.html|title=Poll: Deep anti-Bush sentiment in Canada|date=October 20, 2004|work=Arizona Daily Sun|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> Canadian public opinion of ] was significantly more positive. A 2012 poll found that 65% of Canadians would vote for Obama in the ] "if they could" while only 9% of Canadians would vote for his Republican opponent ]. The same study found that 61% of Canadians felt that the Obama administration had been "good" for America, while only 12% felt it had been "bad". Similarly, a ] poll conducted in June 2016 found that 83% of Canadians were "confident in Obama to do the right thing regarding world affairs".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/06/29/2-obamas-international-image-remains-strong-in-europe-and-asia/|title=2. Obama's international image remains strong in Europe and Asia|first1=Richard|last1=Wike|first2=Jacob|last2=Poushter|first3=Hani|last3=Zainulbhai|date=June 29, 2016|website=Pewglobal.org}}</ref> The study also found that a majority of members of all three major Canadian political parties supported Obama, and also found that Obama had slightly higher approval ratings in Canada in 2012 than he did in 2008. John Ibbitson of '']'' stated in 2012 that Canadians generally supported Democratic presidents over Republican presidents, citing how President ] was "never liked" in Canada and that Canadians generally did not approve of Prime Minister ]'s friendship with President ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/who-do-canadians-want-to-vote-for-barack-obama/article4219652/|title=Who do Canadians want to vote for? Barack Obama|work=The Globe and Mail|access-date=April 27, 2016}}</ref>


A November 2016 poll found 82% of Canadians preferred ] over Donald Trump.<ref>{{cite news |title=Canadians rooting for Hillary Clinton to become president: poll |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/3047708/canadians-rooting-for-hillary-clinton-to-become-president-poll/ |work=Global News |date=November 6, 2016}}</ref> A January 2017 poll found that 66% of Canadians "disapproved" of ], with 23% approving of him and 11% being "unsure". The poll also found that only 18% of Canadians believed Trump's presidency would have a positive impact on Canada, while 63% believed it would have a negative effect.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.torontosun.com/2017/01/24/majority-of-canadians-dont-trust-trump-poll|title=Majority of Canadians don't trust Trump: Poll|newspaper=Toronto Sun|access-date=May 18, 2017}}</ref> A July 2019 poll found 79% of Canadians preferred ] or ] over Trump.<ref>{{cite news |title=Nearly 8 in 10 Canadians prefer Dems over Trump; Sanders, Biden most popular: poll |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/nearly-8-in-10-canadians-prefer-dems-over-trump-sanders-biden-most-popular-poll-1.4517305 |work=CTV News |date=July 21, 2019}}</ref> A Pew Research poll released in June 2021, showed that Canadian opinion of American president ] is much more favorable than his predecessor Donald Trump, with 77% approving of his leadership and having confidence in him to do the right thing.<ref name="pewresearch.org"/>
* "We of the United States consider ourselves blessed. We have much to give thanks for. But the gift of providence we cherish most is that we were given as our neighbors on this wonderful continent the people and the nation of Canada." ]. Remarks at ], ], May 25, 1967.<ref>http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=quotes</ref>


== Resident diplomatic missions ==
* President Barack Obama speaking in ], Canada at his first official international visit February 19, 2009: "I love this country. We could not have a better friend and ally"<ref>http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51I7GY20090219</ref>
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}
; Resident diplomatic missions of Canada in the United States
* ] (])<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.international.gc.ca/country-pays/us-eu/washington.aspx?lang=eng|title=Embassy of Canada to the United States, in Washington, D.C.|first=Global Affairs|last=Canada|date=April 29, 2021|website=GAC}}</ref>
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (])
* ] (])
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Trade Office)
* ] (Trade Office)
* ] (Trade Office)
{{col-2}}
; Resident diplomatic missions of the United States in Canada
* ] (])<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ca.usembassy.gov/embassy-consulates/ottawa/|title=Embassy of the United States in Ottawa}}</ref>
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate-General)
* ] (Consulate)
{{col-end}}


==Diplomatic missions== == See also ==
{{Column|num=2
===Canadian missions in the United States===
|1=
Canada's chief diplomatic mission to the United States is the Canadian Embassy in ]. It is further supported by many Consulates located through America.<ref></ref>
* ]
The Canadian Government supports Consulates in several major U.S. cities including: ], ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ], ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ]‡, ], ], ], ], ]/]‡ and ]‡
* ]
''**‡ denotes mission is Consulate General''
* ]

* ]
There are also trade offices located in ] and ]
* ]

* ]
===American missions in Canada===
The United States's chief diplomatic mission to Canada is the United States Embassy in ]. It is further supported by many consulates located through Canada.<ref></ref>
The American government supports consulates in several major Canadian cities including:
], ], ]‡, ]‡, ], ], ]‡, ], ], ], and ]‡.
* ‡ ''denotes mission is a Virtual Presence Post (VPP)''

==Notes==
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the<ref(erences/)> tags-->
{{Reflist|2}}

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
|2=
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
{{portalbar|Canada|United States|Politics}}


==Further reading== == References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}
* Doran, Charles F., and James Patrick Sewell, "Anti-Americanism in Canada," ''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,'' Vol. 497, Anti-Americanism: Origins and Context (May, 1988), pp.&nbsp;105–119

* Stephen Clarkson, ''Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism and the Canadian State'' (University of Toronto Press, 2002),
=== Cited sources ===
* J. L. Granatstein. ''Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism'' (1997)
* {{cite book |last1=Nugent |first1=Walter |title=Habits of Empire |date=June 10, 2008 |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-307-26949-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_zDQlAp4T4wC |language=en}}
* J. L. Granatstein and Norman Hillmer, ''For Better or for Worse: Canada and the United States to the 1990s'' (1991)

* John W. Holmes. "Impact of Domestic Political Factors on Canadian-American Relations: Canada," ''International Organization,'' Vol. 28, No. 4, Canada and the United States: Transnational and Transgovernmental Relations (Autumn, 1974), pp.&nbsp;611–635
== Further reading ==
* ] and ], ''An Introduction to Canadian-American Relations'' (1984, updated 1989)
{{Further|History of Canadian foreign relations#Relations with United States}}
* Graeme S. Mount and Edelgard Mahant, ''Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies toward Canada during the Cold War'' (1999)
{{refbegin}}
* Bruce Muirhead, "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock," ''American Review of Canadian Studies,'' Vol. 34, 2004
* {{cite book|author1=Anderson, Greg|first2=Christopher|last2=Sands|title=Forgotten Partnership Redux: Canada-U.S. Relations in the 21st Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nZuLZwEACAAJ|year=2011|publisher=Cambria Press|isbn=978-1-60497-762-2|access-date=November 6, 2015}}{{Dead link|date=February 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
* Reginald C. Stuart. ''Dispersed Relations: Americans and Canadians in Upper North America'' (2007)
* Azzi, Stephen. ''Reconcilable Differences: A History of Canada–US Relations'' (Oxford University Press, 2014)
* James Tagg. "'And, We Burned down the White House, Too': American History, Canadian Undergraduates, and Nationalism," ''The History Teacher,'' Vol. 37, No. 3 (May, 2004), pp.&nbsp;309–334
* Behiels, Michael D. and Reginald C. Stuart, eds. ''Transnationalism: Canada–United States History into the Twenty-First Century'' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010) 312 pp.
* C. C. Tansill, ''Canadian-American Relations, 1875-1911'' (1943)
* Bothwell, Robert. ''Your Country, My Country: A Unified History of the United States and Canada'' (2015), 400 pages; traces relations, shared values, and differences across the centuries
* John Herd Thompson and Stephen J. Randall, ''Canada and the United States: Ambivalent Allies'' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994), 387pp
* Boyko, John. ''Cold fire: Kennedy's northern front'' (Alfred A. Knopf Canada, 2016)
* at Library and Archives Canada
* Congressional Research Service. ''Canada–U.S. Relations'' (Congressional Research Service, 2021) , by an agency of the U.S. Congress; Updated February 10, 2021
*]{{Citation
* Clarkson, Stephen. ''Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism and the Canadian State'' (University of Toronto Press, 2002)
* Doran, Charles F., and James Patrick Sewell, "Anti-Americanism in Canada", ''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science'', Vol. 497, Anti-Americanism: Origins and Context (May 1988), pp.&nbsp;105–119
* Dunning, William Archibald. ''The British Empire and the United States'' (1914) celebratory study by a leading American scholar.
* ] "Doing the Continental: A New Canadian-American Relationship" (Dundurn Press, 2010)
* ]{{Cite book
| title = The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy | title = The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy
| publisher = Co-published: RED Publishing, ] | publisher = Co-published: RED Publishing, ]
| date = April 2009 | date = April 2009
| isbn = 978-1-55266-314-1 }} | isbn = 978-1-55266-314-1
}}
* Granatstein, J. L. ''Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism'' (1997)
* Granatstein, J. L. and Norman Hillmer, ''For Better or for Worse: Canada and the United States to the 1990s'' (1991)
* Gravelle, Timothy B. "Partisanship, Border Proximity, and Canadian Attitudes toward North American Integration." ''International Journal of Public Opinion Research'' (2014) 26#4 pp: 453–474.
* Gravelle, Timothy B. "Love Thy Neighbor (u) r? Political Attitudes, Proximity and the Mutual Perceptions of the Canadian and American Publics". ''Canadian Journal of Political Science'' (2014) 47#1 pp: 135–157.
* Greaves, Wilfrid. "Democracy, Donald Trump, and the Canada-US Security Environment". (NAADSN – North American and Arctic Defense Security Network, 2020).
* {{cite journal |last=Hacker |first=Louis M. |title=Western Land Hunger and the War of 1812: A Conjecture |date=March 1924 |pages=365–395 |author-link=Louis M. Hacker |journal=Mississippi Valley Historical Review |volume=X |jstor=1892931 |issue=4 |doi=10.2307/1892931 }}
* Hale, Geoffrey. ''So Near Yet So Far: The Public and Hidden Worlds of Canada-US Relations'' (University of British Columbia Press, 2012); 352 pages focus on 2001–2011
* Hillmer, Norman, and Philippe Lagassé, eds. ''Justin Trudeau and Canadian foreign policy'' (Springer, 2018) .
* Holland, Kenneth. "The Canada–United States defense relationship: a partnership for the twenty-first century". ''Canadian Foreign Policy Journal'' ahead-of-print (2015): 1–6.
* Holmes, Ken. "The Canadian Cognitive Bias and its Influence on Canada/US Relations". ''International Social Science Review'' (2015) 90#1 .
* Holmes, John W. "Canadian External Policies since 1945" "International Journal" 18#2 (1963) 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070206301800201
* Holmes, John W. "Impact of Domestic Political Factors on Canadian-American Relations: Canada", ''International Organization'', Vol. 28, No. 4, Canada and the United States: Transnational and Transgovernmental Relations (Autumn, 1974), pp.&nbsp;611–635
* Innes, Hugh, ed. ''Americanization: Issues for the Seventies'' (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1972). {{ISBN|0-07-092943-2}}; re 1970s
* Keenleyside, Hugh Ll. ''Canada and the United States'' (1929)
* Lennox, Patrick. ''At Home and Abroad: The Canada-U.S. Relationship and Canada's Place in the World'' (University of British Columbia Press; 2010) 192 pages; the post–World War II period.
* Little, John Michael. "Canada Discovered: Continental Perceptions of the Roosevelt Administration, 1939–1945", PhD dissertation. ''Dissertation Abstracts International'', 1978, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p5696-5697
* Lumsden, Ian, ed. ''The Americanization of Canada'', ed. for the University League for Social Reform (U of Toronto Press, 1970). {{ISBN|0-8020-6111-7}}
* McInnis, Edgard W. ''The Unguarded Frontier: A History of American-Canadian Relations'' (1942) ; well-regarded older study
* MacKenzie, Scott A. "But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War" ''American Review of Canadian Studies'' (2017):
* McKercher, Asa. ''Camelot and Canada: Canadian-American Relations in the Kennedy Era'' (Oxford UP, 2016). xii, 298 pp.&nbsp;1960-1963.
* Molloy, Patricia. ''Canada/US and Other Unfriendly Relations: Before and After 9/11'' (Palgrave Macmillan; 2012) 192 pages; essays on various "myths"
* Mount, Graeme S. and Edelgard Mahant. ''Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies toward Canada during the Cold War'' (1999)
* Mount, Graeme S. and Edelgard Mahant. ''''An Introduction to Canadian-American Relations'' (2nd ed.1989)
* Myers, Phillip E. ''Dissolving Tensions: Rapprochement and Resolution in British-American-Canadian Relations in the Treaty of Washington Era, 1865–1914'' (Kent State UP, 2015). x, 326 pp.
* Pacheco, Daniela Pereira. "Politics on Twitter: a comparison between Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau". (ICSCP 2020). {{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
* Paltiel, Jeremy. "Canada's middle-power ambivalence: The palimpsest of US power under the Chinese shadow". in ''America's Allies and the Decline of US Hegemony'' (Routledge, 2019) pp. 126–140.
* Pederson, William D. ed. ''A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt'' (2011) pp 517–41, covers FDR's policies
* {{Cite book |last= Stagg |first=J.C.A. |title=The War of 1812: Conflict for a Continent |series=Cambridge Essential Histories |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-521-72686-3}}
* Stoett, Peter J. "Fairweather Friends? Canada–United States Environmental Relations in the Days of Trump and the Era of Climate Change". in ''Canada–US Relations'' (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019) pp.&nbsp;105–123.
* Stuart, Reginald C. ''Dispersed Relations: Americans and Canadians in Upper North America'' (2007)
* Tagg, James. "'And, We Burned down the White House, Too': American History, Canadian Undergraduates, and Nationalism", ''The History Teacher'', 37#3 (May 2004), pp.&nbsp;309–334
* Tansill, C. C. ''Canadian-American Relations, 1875–1911'' (1943)
* Thompson, John Herd, and Stephen J. Randall. ''Canada and the United States: Ambivalent Allies'' (4th ed. McGill-Queen's UP, 2008), 387pp
* Wrong, Hume, and John W. Holmes. "The Canada–United States Relationship 1927/1951". ''International Journal'' 31#3 (1976): 529–45.


=== Trade and tariffs ===
==External links==
* Ciuriak, Dan, How U.S. Trade Policy Has Changed Under President Donald Trump – Perceptions From Canada (SSRN, March 29, 2019). or
*
* Georges, Patrick. "Canada's Trade Policy Options under Donald Trump: NAFTA's rules of origin, Canada US security perimeter, and Canada's geographical trade diversification opportunities". (Working Paper #1707E Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, 2017).
*
* Grey, Earl. ''The Commercial Policy of the British Colonies and the McKinley Tariff'' (London: Macmillan, 1892).
* - formed in 1897 to foster a spirit of good will between Canada and the United States. For 106 years it held an annual to honor distinguished Canadians or Americans who devoted their careers to strengthening the ties between the two countries.
* Lawder, Robert H. ''Commerce between the United States & Canada, Observations on Reciprocity and the McKinley Tariff'' (Toronto: Monetary Times Printing, 1892).
* Muirhead, Bruce. "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock", ''American Review of Canadian Studies'', Vol. 34, 2004
* Palen, Marc-William. "Protection, federation, and union: The global impact of the McKinley tariff upon the British Empire, 1890–94". ''Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History'' 38.3 (2010): 395–418 {{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}.
* Rioux, Hubert. "Canada First vs. America First: Economic Nationalism and the Evolution of Canada–US Trade Relations". ''European Review of International Studies'' 6.3 (2019): 30–56.

=== Primary sources ===
* Gallagher, Connell. "The Senator George D. Aiken Papers: Sources for the Study of Canadian-American Relations, 1930–1974". ''Archivaria'' 1#21 (1985) pp.&nbsp;176–79 .
* {{cite book|author=Arthur E. Blanchette|title=Canadian foreign policy, 1977–1992: selected speeches and documents|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QxSwZiivWYC&pg=PP1|year=1994|publisher=McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP|isbn=978-0-88629-243-0}}
* {{cite book|author=Arthur E. Blanchette|title=Canadian foreign policy, 1945–2000: major documents and speeches|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SMw7By8tE2MC&pg=PR1|year=2000|publisher=Dundurn Press Ltd.|isbn=978-0-919614-89-5}}
* Riddell, Walter A. ed. ''Documents on Canadian Foreign Policy, 1917–1939'' Oxford University Press, 1962 806 pages of documents
{{refend}}

== External links ==
*
*
*
* *
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813115958/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/en/article/canada-and-the-united-states/ |date=August 13, 2017 }}
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809181532/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/en/article/canadian-american-relations/ |date=August 9, 2017 }}


{{Canada–United States relations}}
{{Foreign relations of the United States |expanded=Bilateral}}
{{Foreign relations of Canada}} {{Foreign relations of Canada}}
{{Foreign relations of the United States}}
{{Trilateral relations of Canada, Mexico, and United States}} {{Trilateral relations of Canada, Mexico, and United States}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:CanadaUnited States Relations}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Canada-United States relations}}
] ]
]

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 04:03, 15 January 2025

Bilateral relations
Canada–United States relations
Map indicating locations of Canada and USA

Canada

United States
Diplomatic mission
Embassy of Canada, Washington, D.C.Embassy of the United States, Ottawa
Envoy
Canadian Ambassador to the United States Kirsten HillmanAmerican Ambassador to Canada David L. Cohen

Canada's long and complex relationship with the United States has had a significant impact on its history, economy, and culture, heritage. The two countries consider themselves among the "closest allies". They share the longest border (8,891 km (5,525 mi)) between any two nations in the world, and also have significant military interoperability. Both Americans and Canadians have generally ranked each other as one of their respective "favorite nations".

The economies and supply chains of both countries are fully integrated. Every day, around 400,000 people and $2.7 billion in goods and services cross the Canada-U. S. border. The close economic partnership has been facilitated by shared values and strong bilateral trade agreements. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and its successor, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), have played a pivotal role in fostering economic cooperation and integration between the two nations. Cross-border projects, such as communications, highways, bridges, and pipelines have led to shared energy networks and transportation systems. The countries have established joint inspection agencies, share data and have harmonized regulations on everything from food to manufactured goods. Despite these facts, disputes have included repeated trade disagreements, environmental concerns, Canadian concern for the future of oil exports, the issue of illegal immigration, the threat of terrorism and illicit drug trade.

Military collaboration was close during World War II and continued throughout the Cold War, bilaterally through NORAD and multilaterally through NATO. However, Canada has long been reluctant to participate in US military operations that are not sanctioned by the United Nations, such as the Vietnam War or the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Canadian peacekeeping is a distinguishing feature that Canadians feel sets their military foreign policy apart from the United States.

Canadian anti-Americanism has manifested itself in a variety of ways, ranging from political, to cultural. Starting with the American Revolution, when Loyalists were resettled in Canada, a vocal element in Canada has warned against American dominance or annexation. The War of 1812 saw invasions across the border in both directions, but the war ended with unchanged borders. The British ceased aiding Native American attacks on the United States, and the United States never again attempted to invade Canada. Apart from minor unsuccessful raids, it has remained peaceful. As Britain decided to disengage, fears of an American takeover played a role in the Canadian Confederation (1867), and Canada's rejection of free trade (1911).

History

Colonial wars

Main article: French and Indian Wars
Map of European colonies in North America, c. 1750. Territorial claims by European powers were fought over during the French and Indian Wars.

Before the British conquest of French Canada in 1760, there had been a series of wars between the British and the French that were fought out in the colonies as well as in Europe and the high seas. In general, the British heavily relied on American colonial militia units, while the French heavily relied on their First Nation allies. The Iroquois Nation were important British allies. Much of the fighting involved ambushes and small-scale warfare in the villages along the border between New England and Quebec. The New England colonies had a much larger population than Quebec, so major invasions came from south to north. The First Nation allies, only loosely controlled by the French, repeatedly raided New England villages to kidnap women and children, and torture and kill the men. Those who survived were brought up as Francophone Catholics. The tension along the border was exacerbated by religion, the French Catholics and English Protestants had a deep mutual distrust. There was a naval dimension as well, involving privateers attacking enemy merchant ships.

England seized Quebec from 1629 to 1632, and Acadia in 1613 and again from 1654 to 1670; These territories were returned to France by the peace treaties. The major wars were (to use American names), King William's War (1689–1697); Queen Anne's War (1702–1713); King George's War (1744–1748), and from 1755 to 1763 the French and Indian War (known in Europe as the Seven Years’ War).

New England soldiers and sailors were critical to the successful British campaign to capture the French fortress of Louisbourg in 1745, and (after it had been returned by treaty) to capture it again in 1758.

American Revolutionary War

Main article: American Revolutionary War
The United Empire Loyalist flag, that is very similar to the Union Jack, was used by immigrants who remained loyal to the British crown during the American Revolutionary War. In present-day Canada, the United Empire Loyalist flag continues to be used as symbol of pride and heritage for loyalist townships and organizations.

At the outset of the American Revolutionary War, the American revolutionaries hoped the French Canadians in Quebec and the Colonists in Nova Scotia would join their rebellion. They were pre-approved for joining the United States in the Articles of Confederation. When northeastern Quebec was invaded, thousands joined the American cause and formed regiments that fought during the war; however, most remained neutral and some joined the British effort. Britain advised the French Canadians that the British Empire already enshrined their rights in the Quebec Act, which the American colonies had viewed as one of the Intolerable Acts. The American invasion was a fiasco and Britain tightened its grip on its northern possessions; in 1777, a major British invasion into New York led to the surrender of the entire British army at Saratoga and led France to enter the war as an ally of the U.S. The French Canadians largely ignored France's appeals for solidarity.

The American forces had much better success in southwestern Quebec, owing to the leadership of Virginia militia leader George Rogers Clark. In 1778, 200 men under Clark, supplied and supported mainly by Virginia, came down the Ohio River near Louisville, Kentucky, marched across southern Illinois, and then captured Kaskaskia without loss of life. From there, part of his men took Vincennes, but was soon lost to British Lieutenant Colonel Henry Hamilton, the commander at Fort Detroit. Clark later retook it in the Siege of Fort Vincennes in February 1779. Roughly half of Clark's militia in the theater were Canadian volunteers sympathetic to the American cause.

In the end, America won its independence and the Treaty of Paris compelled Britain to cede parts of southwestern Canada to them. Following America's independence, Canada became a refuge for about an estimated 70,000 or 15% of Loyalists who either wanted to leave the U.S. or were compelled by Patriot reprisals to do so. Among the original Loyalists, there were 3,500 free African Americans. Most went to Nova Scotia and in 1792, 1,200 migrated to Sierra Leone. About 2,000 black slaves were brought in by Loyalist owners; they remained slaves in Canada until the Empire abolished slavery in 1833. Around 85% of the loyalists remained in the new United States and became American citizens.

War of 1812 (1812-1815)

Main article: War of 1812

The Treaty of Paris of 1783, which ended the American Revolutionary War, called for British forces to vacate all their forts south of the Great Lakes border. Britain refused to do so, citing the failure of the newly-independent United States to provide financial restitution for Loyalists who had lost property in the war. The Jay Treaty in 1795 with Great Britain resolved that lingering issue and the British departed the forts. Thomas Jefferson saw the nearby British presence as a threat to the United States, and so he opposed the Jay Treaty, and it became one of the major political issues in the United States at the time. Thousands of Americans immigrated to Upper Canada (Ontario) from 1785 to 1812 to obtain cheaper land and better tax rates prevalent in that province; despite expectations that they would be loyal to the U.S. if a war broke out, in the event they were largely non-political.

The United States Declaration of War against the British (left) and Governor Issac Brock's proclamation issued in response to it in the Province of Upper Canada (right)

Tensions mounted again after 1805, erupting into the War of 1812 (1812-1815), when the United States Congress, approved / signed by the fourth President James Madison (17xx-1836, served 1809-1817), declared war in June 1812 on Britain. The Americans were angered by British harassment of U.S. ships on the high seas and seizure of 6,000 sailors from American ships, severe restrictions against neutral American trade with France, and British support for hostile Native American tribes in Ohio and territories the U.S. had gained in 1783. American "honor" was an implicit issue. While the Americans could not hope to defeat the Royal Navy and control the seas, they could call on an army much larger than the British garrison in Canada, and so a land invasion of Canada was proposed as the most advantageous means of attacking the British Empire. Americans on the western frontier also hoped an invasion would bring an end to British support of Native American resistance to American expansion, typified by Tecumseh's coalition of tribes. Americans may also have wanted to acquire Canada.

Once war broke out, the American strategy was to seize Canada. There was some hope that settlers in western Canada—most of them recent immigrants from the U.S.—would welcome the chance to overthrow their British rulers. However, the American invasions were defeated primarily by British regulars with support from Native Americans and Upper Canada militia. Aided by the large Royal Navy, a series of British raids on the American coast were highly successful, culminating with an attack on Washington that resulted in the British burning of the White House, the Capitol, and other public buildings. At the end of the war, Britain's American Indian allies had largely been defeated, and the Americans controlled a strip of Western Ontario centered on Fort Malden. However, Britain held much of Maine, and, with the support of their remaining American Indian allies, huge areas of the Old Northwest, including Wisconsin and much of Michigan and Illinois. With the surrender of Napoleon in 1814, Britain ended naval policies that angered Americans; with the defeat of the Indian tribes, the threat to American expansion was ended. The upshot was both the United States and Canada asserted their sovereignty, Canada remained under British rule, and London and Washington had nothing more to fight over. The war was ended by the Treaty of Ghent, which took effect in February 1815. A series of postwar agreements further stabilized peaceful relations along the Canada–US border. Canada reduced American immigration for fear of undue American influence and built up the Anglican Church of Canada as a counterweight to the largely American Baptist and Methodist churches.

In later years, Anglophone Canadians, especially in Ontario, viewed the War of 1812 as a heroic and successful resistance against invasion and as a victory that defined them as a people. The myth that the Canadian militia had defeated the invasion almost single-handed, known logically as the "militia myth", became highly prevalent after the war, having been propounded by John Strachan, Anglican Bishop of York.

Post War of 1812 and mid-19th century

In the aftermath of the War of 1812, pro-British conservatives led by Anglican Bishop John Strachan took control in Ontario ("Upper Canada") and promoted the Anglican religion as opposed to the more republican Methodist and Baptist churches. A small interlocking elite, known as the Family Compact took full political control. Democracy, as practiced in the United States, was ridiculed. The policies had the desired effect of deterring immigration from the United States. Revolts in favor of democracy in Ontario and Quebec ("Lower Canada") in 1837 were suppressed; many of the leaders fled to the US. The American policy was to largely ignore the rebellions, and indeed ignore Canada generally in favor of the westward expansion of the American Frontier.

The Webster–Ashburton Treaty formalized the U.S.–Canada border in Maine, averting the Aroostook War. During the Manifest Destiny era, the "Fifty-Four Forty or Fight" agenda called for U.S. annexation of what became Western Canada; the U.S. and Britain instead agreed to a boundary of the 49th parallel. As harsher fugitive slave laws were passed, Canada became a destination for slaves escaping on the Underground Railroad.

American Civil War

Main article: Canada in the American Civil War
Confederate soldiers force a bank teller to pledge allegiance to the Confederate States of America while conducting the raid at St. Albans, Vermont. The Confederate soldiers launched their raid from the Province of Canada.

The British Empire was neutral during the American Civil War. About 40,000 Canadians volunteered for the Union Army—many already lived in the U.S., and a few for the Confederate Army. However, hundreds of Americans who were called up in the draft fled to Canada.

Several events caused strained relations between the British Empire and the United States, over the former's unofficial role in supporting the Confederacy. Blockade runners loaded with arms came from Great Britain and made use of Canadian ports in the Maritimes to break through the Union blockade to deliver the weaponry to the Confederacy in exchange for cotton. Attacks were made on American merchant shipping by British-built Confederate warships such as CSS Alabama. On December 7, 1863, pro-Confederate Canadian sympathizers hijacked an American steamer and killed a crew member off the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts then used the steamer, originally intended as a blockade runner, to flee back to the Maritimes where they were later able to escape justice for murder and piracy. Confederate Secret Service agents also used Canada as a base to attack American border towns, such as St. Albans, Vermont on October 19, 1864, where they killed an American citizen, robbed three banks of over US$200,000, then escaped to Canada where they were arrested but then released by a Canadian court to widespread American anger. Many Americans falsely suspected that the Canadian government knew of the raid ahead of time. American Secretary of State William H. Seward let the British government know that "it is impossible to consider those proceedings as either legal, just or friendly towards the United States."

Alabama claims

Main article: Alabama Claims

Americans were angry at Britain's perceived support for the Confederacy during the American Civil War. Some leaders demanded a huge payment, on the premise that British involvement had lengthened the war by two years, a claim confirmed by post-Civil War historians and scholars. Senator Charles Sumner, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, originally wanted to ask for $2 billion in war reparations, or alternatively the ceding of all of Canada to the United States.

When American Secretary of State William H. Seward negotiated the Alaska Purchase with Russia in 1867, he intended it as the first step in a comprehensive plan to gain control of the entire northwest Pacific Coast. Seward was a firm believer in Manifest Destiny, primarily for its commercial advantages to the U.S. Seward expected British Columbia to seek annexation to the U.S. and thought Britain might accept this in exchange for the Alabama claims. Soon other elements endorsed annexation, they planned to annex British Columbia, Red River Colony (Manitoba), and Nova Scotia, in exchange for dropping the damage claims. The idea peaked in the spring and summer of 1870, with American expansionists, Canadian separatists, and pro-American Englishmen seemingly combining forces. The plan was dropped for multiple reasons. London continued to stall, American commercial and financial groups pressed Washington for a quick settlement of the dispute on a cash basis, growing Canadian nationalist sentiment in British Columbia called for staying inside the British Empire, Congress became preoccupied with Reconstruction, and most Americans showed little interest in territorial expansion.

The "Alabama Claims" dispute went to international arbitration. In one of the first major cases of arbitration, the tribunal in 1872 rejected the American claims for damages relating to the British blockade running but ordered Britain to pay $15.5 million only for damages caused by British-built Confederate ships. Britain paid and the episode ended in peaceful relations.

Late 19th century

Main article: Canadian Confederation

Canada became a self-governing dominion in 1867 in internal affairs while Britain retained control of diplomacy and defence policy. Before Confederation, there was an Oregon boundary dispute in which the Americans claimed the 54th degree latitude. The Oregon Treaty of 1846 largely resolved the issue, splitting the disputed territory – the northern half became British Columbia, and the southern half eventually formed the states of Washington and Oregon.

The Battle of Eccles Hill in 1870. The American-based Fenian Brotherhood launched several raids into Canada in 1866 and 1870–71.

Strained relations with America continued, however, due to a series of small-scale armed incursions called the "Fenian raids" conducted by Irish-American Civil War veterans across the border from 1866 to 1871 in an attempt to trade Canada for Irish independence. The American government, angry at Canadian tolerance of Confederate raiders during the American Civil War of 1861 to 1865, moved very slowly to disarm the Fenians. The Fenian raids were small-scale attacks carried out by the Fenian Brotherhood, an Irish Republican organization based among Irish Catholics in the United States. Targets included British Army forts, customs posts, and other locations near the border. The raids were small, unsuccessful episodes in 1866, and again from 1870 to 1871. They aimed to bring pressure on Great Britain to withdraw from Ireland. None of these raids achieved their aims and all were quickly defeated by local Canadian forces.

The British government, in charge of diplomatic relations, protested cautiously, as Anglo-American relations were tense. Much of the tension was relieved as the Fenians faded away and in 1872 by the settlement of the Alabama Claims, when Britain paid the U.S. $15.5 million for war losses caused by warships built in Britain and sold to the Confederacy.

Disputes over ocean boundaries on Georges Bank and fishing, whaling, and sealing rights in the Pacific were settled by international arbitration, setting an important precedent.

Early 20th century

Alaska boundary

Main article: Alaska boundary dispute
Border claims made during the Alaska boundary dispute. The border dispute was settled by arbitration in 1903, with the modern boundary marked by a yellow line.

A short-lived controversy was the Alaska boundary dispute, settled in favor of the United States in 1903. The issue was unimportant until the Klondike Gold Rush brought tens of thousands of men to Canada's Yukon, and they had to arrive through American ports. Canada needed its port and claimed that it had a legal right to a port near the present American town of Haines, Alaska. It would provide an all-Canadian route to the rich goldfields. The dispute was settled by arbitration, and the British delegate voted with the Americans—to the astonishment and disgust of Canadians who suddenly realized that Britain considered its relations with the United States paramount compared to those with Canada. The arbitration validated the status quo, but made Canada angry at London.

1907 saw a minor controversy over USS Nashville sailing into the Great Lakes via Canada without Canadian permission. To head off future embarrassments, in 1909 the two sides signed the International Boundary Waters Treaty, and the International Joint Commission was established to manage the Great Lakes and keep them disarmed. It was amended in World War II to allow the building and training of warships.

Free trade rejected

Main article: Reciprocity (Canadian politics)
A 1911 Conservative campaign poster warns that the big American companies ("trusts") will hog all the benefits of reciprocity as proposed by Liberals, leaving little left over for Canadian interests

Anti-Americanism reached a shrill peak in 1911 in Canada. The Liberal government in 1911 negotiated a Reciprocity treaty with the U.S. that would lower trade barriers. Canadian manufacturing interests were alarmed that free trade would allow the bigger and more efficient American factories to take their markets. The Conservatives made it a central campaign issue in the 1911 election, warning that it would be a "sell-out" to the United States with economic annexation a special danger. The Conservative slogan was "No truck or trade with the Yankees", as they appealed to Canadian nationalism and nostalgia for the British Empire to win a major victory.

World War I

British Canadians were annoyed during a brief period from 1914 to 1916, when the United States insisted on neutrality and seemed to profit heavily, while Canada was sacrificing its wealth and its youth. However, when the US finally declared war on Germany in April 1917, there was swift cooperation and friendly coordination, as one historian reports:

Official co-operation between Canada and the United States—the pooling of grain, fuel, power, and transportation resources, the underwriting of a Canadian loan by bankers of New York—produced a good effect on the public mind. Canadian recruiting detachments were welcomed in the United States, while a reciprocal agreement was ratified to facilitate the return of draft evaders. A Canadian War Mission was established at Washington, and in many other ways, the activities of the two countries were coordinated for efficiency. Immigration regulations were relaxed and thousands of American farmhands crossed the border to assist in harvesting Canadian crops. Officially and publicly, at least, the two nations were on better terms than ever before in their history, and on the American side, this attitude extended through almost all classes of society.

Post-World War I

Canada demanded and received permission from London to send its delegation to the Versailles Peace Talks in 1919, with the proviso that it sign the treaty under the British Empire. Throughout the 1920s, Canada began assuming greater responsibility for its own foreign and military affairs. In 1927, the U.S. and Canada exchanged ambassadors for the first time with Canada appointing Vincent Massey and America William Phillips respectively. The postwar era saw the United States pursue isolationism while Canada became an active member of the British Commonwealth, the League of Nations, and the World Court.

In July 1923, as part of his Pacific Northwest tour and a week before his death, U.S. President Warren Harding visited Vancouver, making him the first American head of state to visit confederated Canada. The then Premier of British Columbia, John Oliver, and then mayor of Vancouver, Charles Tisdall, hosted a lunch in his honor at the Hotel Vancouver. Over 50,000 people heard Harding speak in Stanley Park. A monument to Harding designed by Charles Marega was unveiled in Stanley Park in 1925.

Relations with the United States remained cordial until 1930 when Canada vehemently protested the new Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act by which the U.S. raised tariffs on products imported from Canada. Canada retaliated with higher tariffs of its own against American products and moved toward more trade within the British Commonwealth. U.S.–Canadian trade fell 75% as the Great Depression dragged both countries down.

During the 1920s, the war and naval departments of both nations designed war game scenarios with the other as an enemy as part of routine training exercises. In 1921, Canada developed Defence Scheme No. 1 for an attack on American cities and for forestalling an invasion by the United States until British reinforcements could arrive. Throughout the later 1920s and 1930s, the United States Army War College developed a plan for a war with the British Empire waged largely on North American territory: War Plan Red.

Herbert Hoover's meeting in 1927 with British Ambassador Sir Esme Howard agreed on the "absurdity of contemplating the possibility of war between the United States and the British Empire".

Franklin D. Roosevelt speaking at Queen's University at Kingston. Roosevelt spoke on the U.S. relations with Canada while there.

In 1938, as the roots of World War II were set in motion, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt gave a public speech at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, declaring that the United States would not sit idly by if another power tried to dominate Canada. Diplomats saw it as a clear warning to Germany not to attack Canada.

World War II

The two nations cooperated closely in World War II, as both nations saw new levels of prosperity and a determination to defeat the Axis powers. Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King and President Franklin D. Roosevelt were determined not to repeat the mistakes of their predecessors. They met in August 1940 at Ogdensburg, issuing a declaration calling for close cooperation, and formed the Permanent Joint Board on Defense (PJBD).

King sought to raise Canada's international visibility by hosting the August 1943 Quadrant conference in Quebec on military and political strategy; he was a gracious host but was kept out of the important meetings by Winston Churchill and Roosevelt.

Canada allowed the construction of the Alaska Highway and participated in the building of the atomic bomb. 49,000 Americans joined the RCAF (Canadian) or RAF (British) air forces through the Clayton Knight Committee, which had Roosevelt's permission to recruit in the U.S. in 1940–42.

American attempts in the mid-1930s to integrate British Columbia into a united West Coast military command had aroused Canadian opposition. Fearing a Japanese invasion of Canada's vulnerable British Columbia Coast, American officials urged the creation of a united military command for an eastern Pacific Ocean theater of war. Canadian leaders feared American imperialism and the loss of autonomy more than a Japanese invasion. In 1941, Canadians successfully argued within the PJBD for cooperation rather than the unified command for the West Coast.

Newfoundland

The United States built large military bases in Newfoundland during World War II. At the time it was a British crown colony, having lost dominion status. The American spending ended the depression and brought new prosperity; Newfoundland's business community sought closer ties with the United States as expressed by the Economic Union Party. Ottawa took notice and wanted Newfoundland to join Canada, which it did after hotly contested referendums. There was little demand in the United States for the acquisition of Newfoundland, so the United States did not protest the British decision not to allow an American option on the Newfoundland referendum.

Cold War

A NATO summit in Paris, May 1955. Both Canada and the United States are founding members of the military alliance.

Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, working closely with his Foreign Minister Louis St. Laurent, handled foreign relations 1945–48 cautiously. Canada donated money to the United Kingdom to help it rebuild; was elected to the UN Security Council; and helped design NATO. However, Mackenzie King rejected free trade with the United States, and decided not to play a role in the Berlin airlift. Canada had been actively involved in the League of Nations, primarily because it could act separately from Britain. It played a modest role in the postwar formation of the United Nations, as well as the International Monetary Fund. It played a somewhat larger role in 1947 in designing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. After the mid-20th century onwards, Canada and the United States became extremely close partners. Canada was a close ally of the United States during the Cold War.

Vietnam War resisters

Further information: Vietnam War resisters in Canada

While Canada openly accepted draft evaders and later deserters from the United States, there was never a serious international dispute due to Canada's actions, while Sweden's acceptance was heavily criticized by the United States. The issue of accepting American exiles became a local political debate in Canada that focused on Canada's sovereignty in its immigration law. The United States did not become involved because American politicians viewed Canada as a geographically close ally not worth disturbing.

Nixon Shock 1971

Main articles: Nixon shock and Third Option
Richard Nixon addresses a joint session of the Parliament of Canada, 1972

The United States had become Canada's largest market, and after the war, the Canadian economy became dependent on smooth trade flows with the United States so much that in 1971 when the United States enacted the "Nixon Shock" economic policies (including a 10% tariff on all imports) it put the Canadian government into a panic. Washington refused to exempt Canada from its 1971 New Economic Policy, so Trudeau saw a solution in closer economic ties with Europe. Trudeau proposed a "Third Option" policy of diversifying Canada's trade and downgrading the importance of the American market. In a 1972 speech in Ottawa, Nixon declared the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States dead.

Relations deteriorated on many points in the Nixon years (1969–74), including trade disputes, defense agreements, energy, fishing, the environment, cultural imperialism, and foreign policy. They changed for the better when Trudeau and Carter found a better rapport. The late 1970s saw a more sympathetic American attitude toward Canadian political and economic needs, the pardoning of draft evaders who had moved to Canada, and the passing of old such as the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War. Canada more than ever welcomed American investments during "the stagflation" that hurt both nations.

1990s

American, Canadian, and Mexican dignitaries initialing the draft North American Free Trade Agreement in October 1992

The main issues in Canada–US relations in the 1990s focused on the North American Free Trade Agreement, which was signed in 1994. It created a common market that by 2014 was worth $19 trillion, encompassed 470 million people, and had created millions of jobs. Wilson says, "Few dispute that NAFTA has produced large and measurable gains for Canadian consumers, workers, and businesses". However, he adds, "NAFTA has fallen well short of expectations."

Migration history

Main article: American immigration to Canada

From the 1750s to the 21st century, there has been an extensive mingling of the Canadian and American populations, with large movements in both directions.

New England Yankee settled large parts of Nova Scotia before 1775 and were neutral during the American Revolution. At the end of the American Revolution, about 75,000 United Empire Loyalists moved out of the new United States to the eastern Atlantic provinces and south of Quebec. From 1790 to 1812 many farmers moved from New York and New England into Upper Canada (mostly to Niagara, and the north shore of Lake Ontario). In the mid and late 19th century gold rushes attracted American prospectors, mostly to British Columbia after the Cariboo Gold Rush, Fraser Canyon Gold Rush, and later to the Yukon Territory. In the early 20th century, the opening of land blocks in the Prairie Provinces attracted many farmers from the American Midwest. Many Mennonites immigrated from Pennsylvania and formed their colonies. In the 1890s some Mormons went north to form communities in Alberta after the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints rejected plural marriage. The 1960s saw the arrival of about 50,000 draft-dodgers who opposed the Vietnam War.

Loyalists landing in present-day New Brunswick. Large movements of population occurred in both directions from the late-18th to 20th century.

Canada was a way station through which immigrants from other lands stopped for a while, ultimately heading to the U.S. Between 1851 and 1951, 7.1 million people arrived in Canada (mostly from Continental Europe), and 6.6 million left Canada, most of them to the U.S. After 1850, the pace of industrialization and urbanization was much faster in the United States, drawing a wide range of immigrants from the North. By 1870, 1/6 of all the people born in Canada had moved to the United States, with the highest concentrations in New England, which was the destination of Francophone emigrants from Quebec and Anglophone emigrants from the Maritimes. It was common for people to move back and forth across the border, such as seasonal lumberjacks, entrepreneurs looking for larger markets, and families looking for jobs in the textile mills that paid much higher wages than in Canada.

The southward migration slacked off after 1890, as Canadian industry began a growth spurt. By then, the American frontier was closing, and thousands of farmers looking for fresh land moved from the United States north into the Prairie Provinces. The net result of the flows was that in 1901 there were 128,000 American-born residents in Canada (3.5% of the Canadian population) and 1.18 million Canadian-born residents in the United States (1.6% of the U.S. population).

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, about 900,000 French Canadians moved to the U.S., with 395,000 residents there in 1900. Two-thirds went to mill towns in New England, where they formed distinctive ethnic communities. By the late 20th century, most had abandoned the French language (see New England French), but most kept the Catholic religion. About twice as many English Canadians came to the U.S., but they did not form distinctive ethnic settlements.

Relations between political executives

The executive of each country is represented differently. The President of the United States serves as both the head of state and head of government, and his "administration" is the executive, while the Prime Minister of Canada is head of government only, and his or her "government" or "ministry" directs the executive.

W. L. Mackenzie King and Franklin D. Roosevelt (October 1935 – April 1945)

Mackenzie King, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill at the First Quebec Conference in 1943.

In 1940, W. L. Mackenzie King and Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a defense pact, known as the Ogdensburg Agreement. King hosted conferences for Churchill and Roosevelt, but did not participate in the talks.

Louis St. Laurent and Harry S. Truman (November 1948 – January 1953)

Prime Minister Laurent and President Truman were both anti-communist during the early years of the Cold War.

John G. Diefenbaker and Dwight Eisenhower (June 1957 – January 1961)

President Dwight Eisenhower (1952–1961) took pains to foster good relations with Progressive Conservative John Diefenbaker (1957–1963). That led to the approval of plans to join in NORAD, an integrated air defense system, in mid-1957. Relations with President John Kennedy were much less cordial. Diefenbaker opposed apartheid in the South Africa and helped force it out of the Commonwealth of Nations. His indecision on whether to accept Bomarc nuclear missiles from the United States led to his government's downfall.

John G. Diefenbaker and John F. Kennedy (January 1961 – April 1963)

Diefenbaker and President John F. Kennedy did not get along well personally. This was evident in Diefenbaker's response to the Cuban Missile Crisis, where he was slow to support the United States. However, Diefenbaker's Minister of Defence went behind Diefenbaker's back and sent Canada's military to high alert given Canada's legal treaty obligations, to try and appease Kennedy.

Lester B. Pearson and Lyndon B. Johnson (November 1963 – April 1968)

In 1965, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson gave a speech in Philadelphia criticizing American involvement in the Vietnam War. This infuriated Lyndon B. Johnson, who gave him a harsh talk, saying "You don't come here and piss on my rug".

Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan (September 1984 – January 1989)

Ronald Reagan (left) and Brian Mulroney in Venice, Italy, June 11, 1987

Relations between Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan were famously close. This relationship resulted in negotiations for the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement, and the U.S.–Canada Air Quality Agreement to reduce acid-rain-causing emissions, both major policy goals of Mulroney, that would be finalized under the presidency of George H. W. Bush. Mulroney delivered eulogies at the funerals of both Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush.

Jean Chrétien and Bill Clinton (November 1993 – January 2001)

Jean Chrétien shakes hands with Bill Clinton during the APEC summit meeting in November 1993

Although Jean Chrétien was wary of appearing too close to President Bill Clinton, both men had a passion for golf. During a news conference with Prime Minister Chrétien in April 1997, President Clinton quipped "I don't know if any two world leaders have played golf together more than we have, but we meant to break a record". Their governments had many small trade quarrels over the Canadian content of American magazines, softwood lumber, and so on, but on the whole were quite friendly. Both leaders had run on reforming or abolishing NAFTA, but the agreement went ahead with the addition of environmental and labor side agreements. Crucially, the Clinton administration lent rhetorical support to Canadian unity during the 1995 referendum in Quebec on separation from Canada.

Jean Chrétien and George W. Bush (January 2001 – December 2003)

Jean Chrétien shakes hands with George W. Bush during a meeting in September 2002

Relations between Chrétien and George W. Bush were strained throughout their overlapping times in office. Canada offered its full assistance to the U.S. as the September 11 attacks were unfolding. One tangible show of support was Operation Yellow Ribbon, in which more than 200 U.S.-bound flights were diverted to Canada after the U.S. shut down their airspace. Later, however, Chrétien publicly mused that U.S. foreign policy might be part of the "root causes" of terrorism. Some Americans criticized his "smug moralism", and Chrétien's public refusal to support the 2003 Iraq war was met with negative responses in the United States, especially among conservatives.

Stephen Harper and George W. Bush (February 2006 – January 2009)

Stephen Harper holds a joint press conference with George W. Bush during a meeting in Washington, D.C., July 2006

Stephen Harper and George W. Bush were thought to share warm personal relations and also close ties between their administrations. Because Bush was so unpopular among liberals in Canada (particularly in the media), this was underplayed by the Harper government.

Shortly after being congratulated by Bush for his victory in February 2006, Harper rebuked the U.S. ambassador to Canada David Wilkins for criticizing the Conservatives' plans to assert Canada's sovereignty over the Arctic Ocean waters with military force.

Stephen Harper and Barack Obama (January 2009 – November 2015)

Barack Obama meeting with Stephen Harper in Ottawa, February 2009

President Barack Obama's first international trip was to Canada on February 19, 2009, thereby sending a strong message of peace and cooperation. Except Canadian lobbying against "Buy American" provisions in the U.S. stimulus package, relations between the two administrations were smooth.

They also held friendly bets on hockey games during the Winter Olympic season. In the 2010 Winter Olympics hosted by Canada in Vancouver, Canada defeated the U.S. in both gold medal matches, entitling Stephen Harper to receive a case of Molson Canadian beer from Barack Obama; in reverse, if Canada had lost, Harper would have provided a case of Yuengling beer to Obama. During the 2014 Winter Olympics, alongside U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry & Minister of Foreign Affairs John Baird, Stephen Harper was given a case of Samuel Adams beer by Obama for the Canadian gold medal victory over the U.S. in women's hockey, and the semi-final victory over the U.S. in men's hockey.

Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) (2011)

On February 4, 2011, Harper and Obama issued a "Declaration on a Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness" and announced the creation of the Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) "to increase regulatory transparency and coordination between the two countries."

Health Canada and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the RCC mandate, undertook the "first of its kind" initiative by selecting "as its first area of alignment common cold indications for certain over-the-counter antihistamine ingredients (GC January 10, 2013)".

On December 7, 2011, Harper flew to Washington, met with Obama, and signed an agreement to implement the joint action plans that had been developed since the initial meeting in February. The plans called on both countries to spend more on border infrastructure, share more information on people who cross the border, and acknowledge more of each other's safety and security inspection on third-country traffic. An editorial in The Globe and Mail praised the agreement for giving Canada the ability to track whether failed refugee claimants have left Canada via the U.S. and for eliminating "duplicated baggage screenings on connecting flights". The agreement is not a legally binding treaty and relies on the political will and ability of the executives of both governments to implement the terms of the agreement. These types of executive agreements are routine—on both sides of the Canada–U.S. border.

Justin Trudeau and Barack Obama (November 2015 – January 2017)

President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, March 2016

President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau first met formally at the APEC summit meeting in Manila, Philippines in November 2015, nearly a week after the latter was sworn into the office. Both leaders expressed eagerness for increased cooperation and coordination between the two countries during Trudeau's government with Trudeau promising an "enhanced Canada–U.S. partnership".

On November 6, 2015, Obama announced the U.S. State Department's rejection of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, the fourth phase of the Keystone oil pipeline system running between Canada and the United States, to which Trudeau expressed disappointment but said that the rejection would not damage Canada–U.S. relations and would instead provide a "fresh start" to strengthening ties through cooperation and coordination, saying that "Canada–U.S. relationship is much bigger than any one project." Obama has since praised Trudeau's efforts to prioritize the reduction of climate change, calling it "extraordinarily helpful" to establish a worldwide consensus on addressing the issue.

Although Trudeau has told Obama his plans to withdraw Canada's McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet jets assisting in the American-led intervention against ISIL, Trudeau said that Canada will still "do more than its part" in combating the terrorist group by increasing the number of Canadian special forces members training and fighting on the ground in Iraq and Syria.

Trudeau visited the White House for an official visit and state dinner on March 10, 2016. Trudeau and Obama were reported to have shared warm personal relations during the visit, making humorous remarks about which country was better at hockey and which country had better beer. Obama complimented Trudeau's 2015 election campaign for its "message of hope and change" and "positive and optimistic vision". Obama and Trudeau also held "productive" discussions on climate change and relations between the two countries, and Trudeau invited Obama to speak in the Canadian parliament in Ottawa later in the year.

Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump (January 2017 – January 2021)

President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, June 2019

Following the victory of Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Trudeau congratulated him and invited him to visit Canada at the "earliest opportunity". Prime Minister Trudeau and President Trump formally met for the first time at the White House on February 13, 2017, nearly a month after Trump was sworn into the office. Trump has ruffled relations with Canada with tariffs on softwood lumber. Diafiltered Milk was brought up by Trump as an area that needed negotiating.

In 2018, Trump and Trudeau negotiated the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), a free trade agreement concluded between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that succeeded the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The agreement has been characterized as "NAFTA 2.0", or "New NAFTA", since many provisions from NAFTA were incorporated and its changes were seen as largely incremental. On July 1, 2020, the USMCA entered into force in all member states.

In June 2018, after Trudeau explained that Canadians would not be "pushed around" by the Trump tariffs on Canada's aluminum and steel, Trump labeled Trudeau as "dishonest" and "meek", and accused Trudeau of making "false statements", although it is unclear which statements Trump was referring to. Trump's adviser on trade, Peter Navarro, said that there was a "special place in hell" for Trudeau as he employed "bad faith diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump and then tried to stab him in the back on the way out the door ... that comes right from Air Force One." Days later, Trump said that Trudeau's comments are "going to cost a lot of money for the people of Canada".

In June 2019, the U.S. State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said the U.S. "view Canada's claim that the waters of the Northwest Passage are internal waters of Canada as inconsistent with international law".

Justin Trudeau and Joe Biden (January 2021 – January 2025)

President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, March 2023

Following the victory of Joe Biden in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Trudeau congratulated him on his victory; indicating a significant improvement in Canada–U.S. relationships, which had been strained in the years prior during the Presidency of Donald Trump.

On January 22, 2021, Biden and Trudeau held their first phone call. Trudeau was the first foreign leader to receive a phone call from Biden as President.

On February 23, 2021, Biden and Trudeau held their first bilateral meeting. Although virtual, the bilateral meeting was Biden's first as President. The two leaders discussed "COVID-19, economic recovery, climate change, and refugees and migration" among other subjects.

Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump (starting in January 2025 - March/April 2025)

The months leading up to Trump's second presidency were marked by escalating trade disputes and remarks about annexing Canada as a 51st state. Which has caused Canadians to grow wary of America.

On November 29, 2024, Trudeau met with Trump to discuss trade relations, following Trump's threat to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian imports and his intention to renegotiate or dismantle the USMCA. Trudeau stated he would retaliate if Trump implemented tariffs on Canadian goods. Trump responded with public remarks about annexing Canada as a 51st state. This provoked a wide range of reactions from Canadians, with government officials first interpreting it as a joke.

Trump expanded on his remarks throughout December 2024, referring to Canada as a state and Trudeau as a governor on several occasions. On December 18, Trump repeated his remarks, stating on Truth Social:

Many Canadians want Canada to become the 51st State. They would save massively on taxes and military protection. I think it is a great idea. 51st State!!!

Former Deputy Prime Minister Jean Charest called Trump's statement a "wake up call," stating, "For too long, we have been complacent in our relationships with the United States and the rest of the world. We need to unite and rise to this historic occasion to shape the future of Canada." After Trudeau announced his resignation on January 6, 2025, Trump stated,

If Canada merged with the U.S. there would be no Tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be TOTALLY SECURE from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them. Together, what a great Nation it would be!!!

On January 7, Trump stated he would use economic force to coerce Canada into annexation. The same day, Trudeau responded, "There isn't a snowball's chance in hell Canada would become part of the United States."

Military and security

The Canadian military, like forces of other NATO countries, fought in cooperation with the United States in most major conflicts since World War II, including the Korean War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, and most recently the war in Afghanistan. The main exceptions to this were the Canadian government's opposition to some CIA activities in Canada, the Vietnam War, and the Iraq War, which caused some brief diplomatic tensions. Despite these issues, military relations have remained close.

General CQ Brown, Jr., Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, meets with General Jennie Carignan, Chief of the Defence Staff, Canadian Armed Forces at the Pentagon in October 2024

American defense arrangements with Canada are more extensive than with any other country. The Permanent Joint Board of Defense, established in 1940, provides policy-level consultation on bilateral defense matters. The United States and Canada share North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) mutual security commitments. In addition, American and Canadian military forces have cooperated since 1958 on continental air defense within the framework of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Canadian forces have provided indirect support for the American invasion of Iraq that began in 2003. Moreover, interoperability with the American armed forces has been a guiding principle of Canadian military force structuring and doctrine since the end of the Cold War. Canadian navy frigates, for instance, integrate seamlessly into American carrier battle groups.

In commemoration of the 200th Anniversary of the War of 1812 ambassadors from Canada and the United States, and naval officers from both countries gathered at the Pritzker Military Library on August 17, 2012, for a panel discussion on Canada-U.S. relations with emphasis on national security-related matters. Also as part of the commemoration, the navies of both countries sailed together throughout the Great Lakes region.

According to Canadian and U.S. officials, a U.S. fighter jet shot down an unidentified object over Canada on February 23, 2023, on the orders of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The operation was coordinated by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), a joint U.S.-Canadian air defense organization. Prime Minister Trudeau said investigators were looking for debris. This decision was made following the conversation between Biden and Trudeau.

The foreign policies of the countries have been closely aligned, yet ultimately independent, since the Cold War. There is also debate on whether the Northwest Passage is in international waters or under Canadian sovereignty.

Iran hostage crisis

Main article: Canadian Caper

During the 1979 revolution, protesters invaded the U.S. embassy and took many hostages. Six Americans evaded capture and were sheltered by the British and Canadian diplomatic missions. After a U.S. military operation to get them out of Iran failed, Canadian diplomat Ken Taylor, Secretary of State for External Affairs Flora MacDonald, and Prime Minister Joe Clark decided to smuggle the six Americans out of Iran on an international flight by using Canadian passports. An Order in Council was made to issue multiple official copies of Canadian passports with fake identities to the American diplomats in the Canadian sanctuary. The passports contained forged Iranian visas prepared by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

War in Afghanistan

Main article: Canada's role in the invasion of Afghanistan
American and Canadian ISAF soldiers gather to commemorate the 65th anniversary of 1st Special Service Force in Bagram, Afghanistan. The 1st Special Service Force was an American-Canadian unit during World War II.

Canada's elite JTF2 unit joined American special forces in Afghanistan shortly after the al-Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001. Canadian forces joined the multinational coalition in Operation Anaconda in January 2002. On April 18, 2002, an American pilot bombed Canadian forces involved in a training exercise, killing four and wounding eight Canadians. A joint American-Canadian inquiry determined the cause of the incident to be pilot error, in which the pilot interpreted ground fire as an attack; the pilot ignored orders that he felt were "second-guessing" his field tactical decision. Canadian forces assumed a six-month command rotation of the International Security Assistance Force in 2003; in 2005, Canadians assumed operational command of the multi-national Brigade in Kandahar, with 2,300 troops, and supervises the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Kandahar, where al-Qaida forces are most active. Canada has also deployed naval forces in the Persian Gulf since 1991 in support of the UN Gulf Multinational Interdiction Force.

The Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C. maintains a public relations website named CanadianAlly.com, which is intended "to give American citizens a better sense of the scope of Canada's role in North American and Global Security and the War on Terror".

The New Democratic Party and some recent Liberal leadership candidates have expressed opposition to Canada's expanded role in the Afghan conflict because it is inconsistent with Canada's historic role (since the Second World War) of peacekeeping operations.

2003 Invasion of Iraq

See also: Canada and the Iraq War and Canada and Iraq War resisters

According to contemporary polls, 71% of Canadians were opposed to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Many Canadians, and the former Liberal Cabinet headed by Paul Martin (as well as many Americans such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama), made a policy distinction between conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, unlike the Bush Doctrine, which linked these together in a "Global war on terror".

Responding to ISIS/Daesh

Main article: International military intervention against ISIL
Canadian Minister of Defence Harjit Sajjan meets with U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter at NATO headquarters in 2016

Canada has been involved in international responses to the threats from Daesh/ISIS/ISIL in Syria and Iraq and is a member of the Global Coalition to Counter Daesh. In October 2016, Foreign Affairs Minister Dion and National Defence Minister Sajjan met the U.S. special envoy for this coalition. The Americans thanked Canada "for the role of Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) in providing training and assistance to Iraqi security forces, as well as the CAF's role in improving essential capacity-building capabilities with regional forces".

Illicit drugs

Main articles: Drug policy of the United States and Drug policy of Canada

In 2003, the American government became concerned when members of the Canadian government announced plans to decriminalize the use of cannabis. David Murray, an assistant to the U.S. Drug Czar John P. Walters, said in a CBC interview that, "We would have to respond. We would be forced to respond." However, the election of the Conservative Party in early 2006 halted the liberalization of cannabis laws until the Liberal Party of Canada legalized recreational cannabis use in 2018.

A 2007 joint report by American and Canadian officials on cross-border drug smuggling indicated that, despite their best efforts, "drug trafficking still occurs in significant quantities in both directions across the border. The principal illicit substances smuggled across our shared border are MDMA (Ecstasy), cocaine, and cannabis" The report indicated that Canada was a major producer of Ecstasy and marijuana for the U.S. market, while the U.S. was a transit country for cocaine entering Canada.

Trade

Main article: Canada–United States trade relations
Timber being floated along the Fraser River in Vancouver. Trade disputes over softwood lumber exist between the two countries.

Canada and the United States have the world's second-largest trading relationship, with huge quantities of goods and people flowing across the border each year. Since the 1987 Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement, there have been no tariffs on most goods passed between the two countries.

In the course of the softwood lumber dispute, the U.S. has placed tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber because of what it argues is an unfair Canadian government subsidy, a claim that Canada disputes. The dispute has cycled through several agreements and arbitration cases. Other notable disputes include the Canadian Wheat Board, and Canadian cultural protectionism in cultural industries such as magazines, radio, and television. Canadians have been criticized about such things as the ban on beef since a case of Mad Cow disease was discovered in 2003 in cows from the United States (and a few subsequent cases) and the high American agricultural subsidies. Concerns in Canada also run high over aspects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) such as Chapter 11, prior to its suspension and replacement with USMCA.

Cultural relations

See also: North America § Culture

Sports

See also: Canada–United States sports rivalries and Major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada

Several major sports that are popular in the United States have origins in or influences from Canada, such as basketball, which was invented by Canadian-American James Naismith.

Environmental issues

Richard Nixon and Pierre Trudeau at the signing ceremony for the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 1972

A principal instrument of this cooperation is the International Joint Commission (IJC), established as part of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to resolve differences and promote international cooperation on boundary waters. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972 is another historic example of cooperation in controlling trans-border water pollution. However, there have been some disputes. Most recently, the Devil's Lake Outlet, a project instituted by North Dakota, has angered Manitobans who fear that their water may soon become polluted as a result of this project.

Beginning in 1986, the Canadian government of Brian Mulroney began pressing the Reagan administration for an "Acid Rain Treaty" to do something about U.S. industrial air pollution causing acid rain in Canada. The Reagan administration was hesitant and questioned the science behind Mulroney's claims. However, Mulroney was able to prevail. The product was the signing and ratification of the Air Quality Agreement of 1991 by the first Bush administration. Under that treaty, the two governments consult semi-annually on trans-border air pollution, which has demonstrably reduced acid rain, and they have since signed an annex to the treaty dealing with ground level ozone in 2000. Despite this, trans-border air pollution remains an issue, particularly in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence watershed during the summer. The main source of this trans-border pollution results from coal-fired power stations, most of them located in the Midwestern United States. As part of the negotiations to create NAFTA, Canada and the U.S. signed, along with Mexico, the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation that created the Commission for Environmental Cooperation that monitors environmental issues across the continent, publishing the North American Environmental Atlas as one aspect of its monitoring duties.

Currently, neither of the countries' governments support the Kyoto Protocol, which set out time scheduled curbing of greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike the United States, Canada has ratified the agreement. Yet after ratification, due to internal political conflict within Canada, the Canadian government does not enforce the Kyoto Protocol and has received criticism from environmental groups and other governments for its climate change positions. In January 2011, the Canadian minister of the environment, Peter Kent, explicitly stated that the policy of his government about greenhouse gas emissions reductions is to wait for the United States to act first, and then try to harmonize with that action – a position that has been condemned by environmentalists and Canadian nationalists, and as well as scientists and government think-tanks.

With large freshwater supplies in Canada and long-term concern about water scarcity in parts of the United States, water export availability or restriction has been identified as an issue of possible future contention between the countries.

Newfoundland fisheries dispute

The United States and Britain had a long-standing dispute about the rights of Americans fishing in the waters near Newfoundland. Before 1776, there was no question that American fishermen, mostly from Massachusetts, had rights to use the waters off Newfoundland. In the peace treaty negotiations of 1783, the Americans insisted on a statement of these rights. However, France, an American ally, disputed the American position because France had its own specified rights in the area and wanted them to be exclusive. The Treaty of Paris (1783) gave the Americans not rights, but rather "liberties" to fish within the territorial waters of British North America and to dry fish on certain coasts.

After the War of 1812, the Convention of 1818 between the United States and Britain specified exactly what liberties were involved. Canadian and Newfoundland fishermen contested these liberties in the 1830s and 1840s. The Canadian–American Reciprocity Treaty of 1854, and the Treaty of Washington of 1871 spelled out the liberties in more detail. However the Treaty of Washington expired in 1885, and there was a continuous round of disputes over jurisdictions and liberties. Britain and the United States sent the issue to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 1909. It produced a compromise settlement that permanently ended the problems.

Common memberships

Canada and the United States both hold membership in several multinational organizations, including:

Territorial disputes

See also: List of areas disputed by Canada and the United States
A "buoy" on Machias Seal Island. The waters around the island are one of several maritime territorial disputes between the two countries.

The two countries have had several territorial disputes throughout their histories. Current maritime territorial disputes between the two countries include the Beaufort Sea, Dixon Entrance, Strait of Juan de Fuca, San Juan Islands, Machias Seal Island, and North Rock. Additionally, the United States is one of several countries that contends the Northwest Passage is international waters; whereas the Canadian government asserts it forms Canadian Internal Waters. The Inside Passage is also disputed as international waters by the United States.

Historical boundary disputes include the Aroostook War at the MaineNew Brunswick border; the Oregon boundary dispute at the present day British ColumbiaWashington border; and the Alaska Boundary Dispute at the Alaska–British Columbia border. The Maine–New Brunswick boundary dispute was resolved through the Webster–Ashburton Treaty in 1842, the Oregon boundary dispute through the Oregon Treaty of 1846, and the Alaska boundary dispute through arbitration in 1903.

Northwest Passage

Popular routes on the Northwest Passage

A long-simmering dispute between Canada and the U.S. involves the issue of Canadian sovereignty over the Northwest Passage (the sea passages in the Arctic). Canada's assertion that the Northwest Passage represents internal (territorial) waters has been challenged by other countries, especially the U.S., which argue that these waters constitute an international strait. Canadians were alarmed when Americans drove the reinforced oil tanker Manhattan through the Northwest Passage in 1969, followed by the icebreaker Polar Sea in 1985, which resulted in a minor diplomatic incident. In 1970, the Canadian parliament enacted the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, which asserts Canadian regulatory control over pollution within a 100-mile zone. In response, the United States in 1970 stated, "We cannot accept the assertion of a Canadian claim that the Arctic waters are internal waters of Canada. ... Such acceptance would jeopardize the freedom of navigation essential for United States naval activities worldwide." A compromise of sorts was reached in 1988, by an agreement on "Arctic Cooperation", which pledges that voyages of American icebreakers "will be undertaken with the consent of the Government of Canada". However, the agreement did not alter either country's basic legal position. Paul Cellucci, the American ambassador to Canada, in 2005 suggested to Washington that it should recognize the straits as belonging to Canada. His advice was rejected and Harper took opposite positions. The U.S. opposes Harper's proposed plan to deploy military icebreakers in the Arctic to detect interlopers and assert Canadian sovereignty over those waters.

Views of presidents and prime ministers

Presidents and prime ministers typically make formal or informal statements that indicate the diplomatic policy of their administration. Diplomats and journalists at the time—and historians since—dissect the nuances and tone to detect the warmth or coolness of the relationship.

  • Prime Minister John A. Macdonald, speaking at the beginning of the 1891 election (fought mostly over Canadian free trade with the United States), arguing against closer trade relations with the U.S. stated "As for myself, my course is clear. A British subject I was born—a British subject I will die. With my utmost effort, with my latest breath, will I oppose the 'veiled treason' which attempts by sordid means and mercenary proffers to lure our people from their allegiance." (February 3, 1891.)

Canada's first Prime Minister also said:

It has been said that the United States Government is a failure. I don't go so far. On the contrary, I consider it a marvelous exhibition of human wisdom. It was as perfect as human wisdom could make it, and under it, the American States greatly prospered until very recently, but being the work of men it had its defects, and it is for us to take advantage by experience, and endeavor to see if we cannot arrive by careful study at such a plan as will avoid the mistakes of our neighbors. In the first place, we know that every individual state was an individual sovereign—that each had its own army and navy and political organization – and when they formed themselves into a confederation they only gave the central authority certain specific rights appertaining to sovereign powers. The dangers that have risen from this system we will avoid if we can agree upon forming a strong central government—a great Central Legislature—a constitution for a Union which will have all the rights of sovereignty except those that are given to the local governments. Then we shall have taken a great step in advance of the American Republic. (September 12, 1864)

  • Prime Minister John Sparrow Thompson, angry at failed trade talks in 1888, privately complained to his wife, Lady Thompson, that "These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence."
  • After World War II years of close military and economic cooperation, President Harry S. Truman said in 1947 that "Canada and the United States have reached the point where we can no longer think of each other as 'foreign' countries."
  • President John F. Kennedy told Parliament in Ottawa in May 1961 that "Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder."
  • President Lyndon B. Johnson helped open Expo '67 with an upbeat theme, saying "We of the United States consider ourselves blessed. We have much to give thanks for. But the gift of providence we cherish most is that we were given as our neighbors on this wonderful continent the people and the nation of Canada." Remarks at Expo '67, Montreal, May 25, 1967.
Trudeau Washington Press Club speech Trudeau's famous "sleeping with an elephant" quotation
  • Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau famously said that being America's neighbor "is like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast, if one can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."
  • Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, sharply at odds with the U.S. over Cold War policy, warned at a press conference in 1971 that the overwhelming American presence posed "a danger to our national identity from a cultural, economic and perhaps even military point of view."
  • President Richard Nixon, in a speech to Parliament in 1972 was angry at Trudeau and declared that the "special relationship" between Canada and the United States was dead. "It is time for us to recognize", he stated, "that we have very separate identities; that we have significant differences; and that nobody's interests are furthered when these realities are obscured."
  • In late 2001, President George W. Bush did not mention Canada during a speech in which he thanked a list of countries who had assisted in responding to the events of September 11, although Canada had provided military, financial, and other support. Ten years later, David Frum, one of President Bush's speechwriters, stated that it was an unintentional omission.
  • Prime Minister Stephen Harper, in a statement congratulating Barack Obama on his inauguration, stated that "The United States remains Canada's most important ally, closest friend and largest trading partner and I look forward to working with President Obama and his administration as we build on this special relationship."
  • President Barack Obama, speaking in Ottawa at his first official international visit on February 19, 2009, said, "I love this country. We could not have a better friend and ally."
  • President Joe Biden, while addressing Parliament on March 24, 2023, emphasized the strong relationship between the two countries, stating, “Americans and Canadians are two people, two countries, in my view, sharing one heart, a personal connection. No two nations on Earth are bound by such close ties, friendship, family, commerce and culture." Biden additionally commented on Canada's sports culture, saying, "I have to say, I like your teams except the Leafs." which was met with laughter and applause.

Public opinion

Today there remain cross-border cultural ties and according to Gallup's annual public opinion polls, Canada has consistently been Americans' favorite nation, with 96% of Americans viewing Canada favorably in 2012. As of spring 2013, 64% of Canadians had a favorable view of the U.S. and 81% expressed confidence in then-US President Obama to do the right thing in international matters. According to the same poll, 30% viewed the U.S. negatively. In addition, according to Spring 2017 Global Attitudes Survey, 43% of Canadians view the U.S. positively, while 51% hold a negative view. More recently, however, a poll in January 2018 showed Canadians' approval of U.S. leadership dropped by over 40 percentage points under President Donald Trump, in line with the view of residents of many other U.S. allied and neutral countries. Since then, Canadian opinion of the U.S. has improved significantly, following an international rebound in the U.S. image abroad following the transition as President of the United States from Donald Trump to Joe Biden, with 61% of Canadians having a favorable opinion of the United States in 2021.

Anti-Americanism

Further information: Anti-Americanism § Canada

Anti-Americanism in Canada has unique historic roots. Since the arrival of the Loyalists as refugees from the American Revolution in the 1780s, historians have identified a constant theme of Canadian fear of the United States and of "Americanization" or a cultural takeover. In the War of 1812, for example, the enthusiastic response by French militia to defend Lower Canada reflected, according to Heidler and Heidler (2004), "the fear of Americanization". Scholars have traced this attitude over time in Ontario and Quebec.

A Canadian political cartoon from 1869 of a "Young Canada" kicking out Uncle Sam from "Dominion House", while John Bull watches in the background

Canadian intellectuals who wrote about the U.S. in the first half of the 20th century identified America as the world center of modernity and deplored it. Anti-American Canadians (who admired the British Empire) explained that Canada had narrowly escaped American conquest with its rejection of tradition, its worship of "progress" and technology, and its mass culture; they explained that Canada was much better because of its commitment to orderly government and societal harmony. There were a few ardent defenders of the nation to the south, notably liberal and socialist intellectuals such as F. R. Scott and Jean-Charles Harvey (1891–1967).

Looking at television, Collins (1990) finds that it is in Anglophone Canada that fear of cultural Americanization is most powerful, for there the attractions of the U.S. are strongest. Meren (2009) argues that after 1945, the emergence of Quebec nationalism and the desire to preserve French-Canadian cultural heritage led to growing anxiety regarding American cultural imperialism and Americanization. In 2006 surveys showed that 60 percent of Québécois had a fear of Americanization, while other surveys showed they preferred their current situation to that of the Americans in the realms of health care, quality of life as seniors, environmental quality, poverty, educational system, racism and standard of living. While agreeing that job opportunities are greater in America, 89 percent disagreed with the notion that they would rather be in the United States, and they were more likely to feel closer to English Canadians than to Americans. However, there is evidence that the elites and Quebec are much less fearful of Americanization and much more open to economic integration than the general public.

Signage advocating against free trade with the United States on a building in Toronto in 1911

The history has been traced in detail by a leading Canadian historian J.L. Granatstein in Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism (1997). Current studies report the phenomenon persists. Two scholars report, "Anti-Americanism is alive and well in Canada today, strengthened by, among other things, disputes related to NAFTA, American involvement in the Middle East, and the ever-increasing Americanization of Canadian culture." Jamie Glazov writes, "More than anything else, Diefenbaker became the tragic victim of Canadian anti-Americanism, a sentiment the prime minister had fully embraced by 1962. unable to imagine himself (or his foreign policy) without enemies." Historian J. M. Bumsted says, "In its most extreme form, Canadian suspicion of the United States has led to outbreaks of overt anti-Americanism, usually spilling over against American residents in Canada." John R. Wennersten writes, "But at the heart of Canadian anti-Americanism lies a cultural bitterness that takes an American expatriate unaware. Canadians fear the American media's influence on their culture and talk critically about how Americans are exporting a culture of violence in its television programming and movies." However Kim Nossal points out that the Canadian variety is much milder than anti-Americanism in some other countries. By contrast, Americans show very little knowledge or interest one way or the other regarding Canadian affairs. Canadian historian Frank Underhill, quoting Canadian playwright Merrill Denison summed it up: "Americans are benevolently ignorant about Canada, whereas Canadians are malevolently informed about the United States."

Canadian public opinion on U.S. presidents

Anti-Trump rally organized in Vancouver in January 2017

United States President George W. Bush was "deeply disliked" by a majority of Canadians according to the Arizona Daily Sun. A 2004 poll found that more than two-thirds of Canadians favored Democrat John Kerry over Bush in the 2004 presidential election, with Bush's lowest approval ratings in Canada being in the province of Quebec where just 11% of the population supported him. Canadian public opinion of Barack Obama was significantly more positive. A 2012 poll found that 65% of Canadians would vote for Obama in the 2012 presidential election "if they could" while only 9% of Canadians would vote for his Republican opponent Mitt Romney. The same study found that 61% of Canadians felt that the Obama administration had been "good" for America, while only 12% felt it had been "bad". Similarly, a Pew Research poll conducted in June 2016 found that 83% of Canadians were "confident in Obama to do the right thing regarding world affairs". The study also found that a majority of members of all three major Canadian political parties supported Obama, and also found that Obama had slightly higher approval ratings in Canada in 2012 than he did in 2008. John Ibbitson of The Globe and Mail stated in 2012 that Canadians generally supported Democratic presidents over Republican presidents, citing how President Richard Nixon was "never liked" in Canada and that Canadians generally did not approve of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's friendship with President Ronald Reagan.

A November 2016 poll found 82% of Canadians preferred Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump. A January 2017 poll found that 66% of Canadians "disapproved" of Donald Trump, with 23% approving of him and 11% being "unsure". The poll also found that only 18% of Canadians believed Trump's presidency would have a positive impact on Canada, while 63% believed it would have a negative effect. A July 2019 poll found 79% of Canadians preferred Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders over Trump. A Pew Research poll released in June 2021, showed that Canadian opinion of American president Joe Biden is much more favorable than his predecessor Donald Trump, with 77% approving of his leadership and having confidence in him to do the right thing.

Resident diplomatic missions

Resident diplomatic missions of Canada in the United States
Resident diplomatic missions of the United States in Canada

See also

Portals:

References

  1. "The Canada–U.S. border: by the numbers". cbc.ca. CBC/Radio-Canada. December 7, 2011. Retrieved March 23, 2016.
  2. Cudmore, James. "Canadian military explored plan to fully integrate forces with U.S. – Politics – CBC News". Cbc.ca. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
  3. Poushter, Jacob (October 6, 2015). "Canadians Satisfied with U.S. Relationship". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
  4. Brenan, Megan (March 21, 2023). "Canada, Britain Favored Most in U.S.; Russia, N. Korea Least". Gallup, Inc. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
  5. "State of Trade 2024: Supply chains". GAC. August 28, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  6. "Canada-United States relations". GAC. March 28, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  7. "Canada-United States relations". GAC. March 28, 2019. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  8. "U.S. Relations With Canada". United States Department of State. September 30, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  9. "Canada and the United States". The Canadian Encyclopedia. June 11, 2020. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  10. ^ Massie, Justin (April 30, 2019). "Why Canada Goes to War: Explaining Combat Participation in US-led Coalitions". Canadian Journal of Political Science. 52 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 575–594. doi:10.1017/s0008423919000040. ISSN 0008-4239.
  11. Gutiérrez-Haces, Maria Teresa (November 6, 2018). Identity and Otherness in Canadian Foreign Policy. Collection internationale d'Études canadiennes | International Canadian Studies Series. University of Ottawa Press. pp. 231–250. ISBN 978-0-7766-2722-9.
  12. Carroll, Michael K (2016). "Peacekeeping: Canada's past, but not its present and future?". International Journal. 71 (1). : 167–176. doi:10.1177/0020702015619857. ISSN 0020-7020. JSTOR 44631172. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  13. "Canada's Current Role in World" (PDF). Environics Institute for Survey Research.
  14. ^ Doran, Charles F.; Sewell, James Patrick (1988). "Anti-Americanism in Canada?". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 497. : 105–119. doi:10.1177/0002716288497001009. ISSN 0002-7162. JSTOR 1045764.
  15. ^ Kim Richard Nossal (2007). "Anti-Americanism in Canada," in Brendon O'Connor, ed., Anti-Americanism: History, Causes, and Themes" (PDF). Oxford/Westport: Greenwood World Publishing}. pp. 59, 76.
  16. "War of 1812". www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
  17. John Herd Thompson, Canada and the United States: ambivalent allies (2008).
  18. Thomas Morgan, William (1926). "The Five Nations and Queen Anne". Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 13 (2): 169–189. doi:10.2307/1891955. JSTOR 1891955.
  19. June Namias, White Captives: Gender and Ethnicity on the American Frontier (1993)
  20. Howard H. Peckham, The Colonial Wars (1965)
  21. Chard, Donald F. (1975). "The Impact of French Privateering on New England, 1689–1713". American Neptune. 35 (3): 153–165.
  22. Shortt, S. E. D. (1972). "Conflict and Identity in Massachusetts: The Louisbourg Expedition of 1745". Social History/Histoire Sociale. 5 (10): 165–185.
  23. Johnston, A. J. B. (2008). "D-Day at Louisbourg". Beaver. 88 (3): 16–23.
  24. "The Loyalist Flag". UELAC. December 6, 2021. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
  25. Mason Wade, The French Canadians, 1760–1945 (1955) p. 74.
  26. George W. Geib (1987). "The Old Northwest Under British Control, 1763–1783" and "Indiana A Part of the Old Northwest, 1783–1800". Butler University. pp. 42–44.
  27. Thomas B. Allen, Tories: Fighting for the King in America's First Civil War (2011) p. xviii
  28. Bradford Perkins, The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805 (1955)
  29. Rawlyk, George A. (1994). The Canada Fire: Radical Evangelicalism in British North America, 1775–1812. McGill-Queen's Press. p. 122. ISBN 9780773512214. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  30. Alan Taylor, The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies (2010).
  31. Stagg 2012, pp. 5–6.
  32. George F. G. Stanley, 1983, p. 32
  33. David Heidler, Jeanne T. Heidler, The War of 1812, pg4
  34. Tucker 2011, p. 236.
  35. Nugent 2008, p. 73, 75.
  36. Mark Zuehlke, For Honour's Sake: The War of 1812 and the Brokering of an Uneasy Peace (2007) is a Canadian perspective.
  37. W.L. Morton, The Kingdom of Canada (1969) ch 12
  38. Cleves, Rachel Hope; Eustace, Nicole; Gilje, Paul; Hale, Matthew Rainbow; Morgan, Cecilia; Opal, Jason M.; Peskin, Lawrence A.; Taylor, Alan (2012). "Interchange: The War of 1812". The Journal of American History. 99 (2). : 520–555. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas236. ISSN 0021-8723. JSTOR 44306807. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
  39. Wood, James A. (2010). Militia Myths (PDF). Vancouver: UBC Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-7748-1765-3. OCLC 473375581.
  40. Dunning, Tom (2009). "The Canadian Rebellions of 1837 and 1838 as a Borderland War: A Retrospective". Ontario History. 101 (2): 129–141. doi:10.7202/1065615ar.
  41. Orrin Edward Tiffany, The Relations of the United States to the Canadian Rebellion of 1837–1838 (1905). excerpt and text search
  42. Cross, L.D. (2010). The Underground Railroad: The long journey to freedom in Canada. Amazing Stories. James Lorimer Limited, Publishers. p. intro. ISBN 978-1-55277-581-3.
  43. "Underground Railroad". CBC. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
  44. Robin W. Winks, "The Creation of a Myth: 'Canadian' Enlistments in the Northern Armies during the American Civil War", Canadian Historical Review, 1958 39(1): 24–40.
  45. Adam Mayers, Dixie & the Dominion: Canada, the Confederacy, and the War for the Union (2003)
  46. ^ "Alabama Claims, 1862–1872". GlobalSecurity.org.
  47. Mayers, Dixie & the Dominion pp 105–116.
  48. Congressional series of United States public documents. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1870. p. 71.
  49. David Keys (June 24, 2014). "Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years". The Independent.
  50. Paul Hendren (April 1933). "The Confederate Blockade Runners". United States Naval Institute.
  51. Sexton, Jay (2005). Debtor Diplomacy: Finance and American Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era, 1837–1873. Oxford University Press. p. 206. ISBN 9780199281039. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  52. Theodore C. Blegen, "A Plan for the Union of British North America and the United States, 1866". Mississippi Valley Historical Review 4.4 (1918): 470–483 online.
  53. Doris W. Dashew, "The Story of An Illusion: The Plan To Trade 'Alabama' Claims For Canada", Civil War History, December 1969, Vol. 15 Issue 4, pp 332–348
  54. Shi, David E. (1978). "Seward's Attempt to Annex British Columbia, 1865–1869". Pacific Historical Review. 47 (2): 217–238. doi:10.2307/3637972. JSTOR 3637972.
  55. Shain, Yossi (1999). Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands. Cambridge U.P. p. 53. ISBN 9780521642255. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  56. David Sim, "Filibusters, Fenians, and a Contested Neutrality: The Irish Question and US Diplomacy, 1848–1871". American Nineteenth Century History 12.3 (2011): 265–287.
  57. Robert M. Groceman, "Patriot War and the Fenian Raids: Case Studies in Border Security on the US Canada Border in the Nineteenth Century" (US Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth United States, 2017) online Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine.
  58. Kurlansky, Mark (1998). Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World. Penguin. p. 117. ISBN 9781440672873. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  59. Munro, John A. (1965). "English-Canadianism and the Demand for Canadian Autonomy: Ontario's Response to the Alaska Boundary Decision, 1903". Ontario History. 57 (4): 189–203.
  60. David G. Haglund, and Tudor Onea. "Victory without Triumph: Theodore Roosevelt, Honour, and the Alaska Panhandle Boundary Dispute". Diplomacy and Statecraft 19.1 (2008): 20-41.
  61. Tucker, Spencer (2011). World War II at Sea: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 142. ISBN 9781598844573.
  62. Baker, W. M. (1970). "A Case Study of Anti-Americanism in English-Speaking Canada: The Election Campaign of 1911". Canadian Historical Review. 51 (4): 426–449. doi:10.3138/chr-051-04-04. S2CID 161614104.
  63. Clements, Kendrick A. (1973). "Manifest Destiny and Canadian Reciprocity in 1911". Pacific Historical Review. 42 (1): 32–52. doi:10.2307/3637741. JSTOR 3637741.
  64. Ellis, Lewis E. (1968). Reciprocity, 1911: a study in Canadian–American relations. Greenwood.
  65. Paolo E. Coletta, The Presidency of William Howard Taft (1973) pp. 141–152.
  66. Hugh Ll. Keenleyside, Canada and the United States (1929) p 373. online
  67. Warren G. Harding & Stanley Park. The History of Metropolitan Vancouver. Vancouver.ca Archived September 16, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved June 11, 2017
  68. Richard N. Kottman, "Herbert Hoover and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff: Canada, A Case Study", Journal of American History, Vol. 62, No. 3 (December 1975), pp. 609–635 in JSTOR
  69. McDonald, Judith; et al. (1997). "Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot–Hawley Tariff", (1997)". Journal of Economic History. 57 (4): 802–826. doi:10.1017/S0022050700019549. JSTOR 2951161. S2CID 154380335.
  70. Carlson, Peter (December 30, 2005). "Raiding the Icebox". The Washington Post.
  71. Bell, Christopher M. (1997). "Thinking the Unthinkable: British and American Naval Strategies for an Anglo-American War, 1918–1931". International History Review. 19 (4): 789–808. doi:10.1080/07075332.1997.9640804.
  72. Arnold A. Offner, American Appeasement: United States Foreign Policy and Germany, 1933–1938 (1969) p. 256
  73. Galen Roger Perras, Franklin Roosevelt and the Origins of the Canadian-American Security Alliance, 1933–1945 (1998)
  74. Richard Jensen, "Nationalism and Civic Duty in Wartime: Comparing World Wars in Canada and America", Canadian Issues / Thèmes Canadiens, December 2004, pp 6–10
  75. Rachel Lea Heide, "Allies in Complicity: The United States, Canada, and the Clayton Knight Committee's Clandestine Recruiting of Americans for the Royal Canadian Air Force, 1940–1942", Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 2004, Vol. 15, pp 207–230
  76. Galen Roger Perras, "Who Will Defend British Columbia? Unity of Command on the West Coast, 1934–1942", Pacific Northwest Quarterly, Spring 1997, Vol. 88 Issue 2, pp 59–69
  77. McNeil Earle, Karl (1998). "Cousins of a Kind: The Newfoundland and Labrador Relationship with the United States". American Review of Canadian Studies. 28 (4): 387–411. doi:10.1080/02722019809481611.
  78. C. P. Stacey, Canada and the Age of Conflict: A History of Canadian External Policies. Volume 2, 1921–1948: The Mackenzie King Era (1982) pp 420–424.
  79. Hector Mackenzie, "Golden Decade (s)? Reappraising Canada's International Relations in the 1940s and 1950s". British Journal of Canadian Studies 23.2 (2010): 179–206.
  80. Don Munton and John Kirton, eds. Cases and Readings in Canadian Foreign Policy Since World War II (1992) pp 2–18.
  81. Stewart, Luke (2018). "'Hell, they're your problem, not ours': Draft Dodgers, Military Deserters and Canada–United States Relations in the Vietnam War Era". Études Canadiennes / Canadian Studies (85). Open Edition: 67–96. doi:10.4000/eccs.1479. S2CID 181777562.
  82. Bruce Muirhead, "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock", American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 34, 2004 online edition Archived March 23, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  83. Lily Gardner Feldman, "Canada and the United States in the 1970s: Rift and Reconciliation". The World Today 34.12 (1978): 484–492. online
  84. Hills, Carla A. "NAFTA's Economic Upsides: The View from the United States". Foreign Affairs 93 (2014): 122. online
  85. Wilson, Michael. "NAFTA's Unfinished Business: The View from Canada". Foreign Affairs 93 (2014): 128. online
  86. Marcus Lee Hansen, The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical (1940)
  87. John Brebner, The Neutral Yankees of Nova Scotia: A Marginal Colony During the Revolutionary Years (1937)
  88. Marcus Lee Hansen, The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical (1940); David D. Harvey, Americans in Canada: Migration and Settlement since 1840 (1991)
  89. Renee Kasinsky, "Refugees from Militarism: Draft Age Americans in Canada (1976)
  90. ^ Barkan, Elliott Robert (1980). "French Canadians". In Thernstrom, Stephan; Orlov, Ann; Handlin, Oscar (eds.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Harvard University Press. p. 392. ISBN 0674375122. OCLC 1038430174.
  91. John J. Bukowczyk et al. Permeable Border: The Great Lakes Region as Transnational Region, 1650–1990 (University of Pittsburgh Press. 2005)
  92. J. Castell Hopkins, The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs: 1902 (1903), p. 327.
  93. Yves Roby, The Franco-Americans of New England (2004)
  94. Brookes, Alan A. (1980). "Canadians, British". In Thernstrom, Stephan; Orlov, Ann; Handlin, Oscar (eds.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Harvard University Press. p. 191. ISBN 0674375122. OCLC 1038430174.
  95. Soloman Gabriel, Foreign Policy of Canada: A Study in Diefenbaker's Years (1987).
  96. Potter, Mitch (November 18, 2013). "JFK's war with Diefenbaker". The Toronto Star. Retrieved June 12, 2018.
  97. Preston, Andrew (2003). "Balancing War and Peace: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Vietnam War, 1961–1965". Diplomatic History. 27: 73–111. doi:10.1111/1467-7709.00340.
  98. Brean, Joseph (November 17, 2014). "'I've been called worse things by better people: A history of Canadian PMs' not-so-diplomatic one-liners". National Post. National Post. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
  99. Grande, Peggy (2017). "8: Rawhide's Ranch". The president will see you now: my stories and lessons from Ronald Reagan's final years (First ed.). New York. ISBN 9780316396455. OCLC 951764632.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  100. "The President's News Conference With Prime Minister Jean Chretien of Canada". The American Presidency Project. April 8, 1997. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  101. Jehl, Douglas (February 24, 1995). "Clinton, in Talk to Canadians, Opposes Quebec Separation". The New York Times.
  102. Drache, Daniel (2008). Big Picture Realities: Canada and Mexico at the Crossroads. Wilfrid Laurier U.P. p. 115. ISBN 9781554582334. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  103. "Prime ministers and presidents". CBC News. February 18, 2009.
  104. "Guest column: Time, Canada, to negotiate the Northwest Passage". CBC News. Retrieved July 18, 2017.
  105. "Obama to visit Canada Feb. 19, PMO confirms – CTV News". Ctv.ca. January 28, 2009. Archived from the original on June 6, 2009. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  106. "Obama loses boozy bet with Harper". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  107. "Barack Obama follows through on Olympic beer bet". canoe.ca. Archived from the original on February 25, 2014. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  108. "Joint Statement by President Obama and Prime Minister Harper of Canada on Regulatory Cooperation". whitehouse.gov. February 4, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011 – via National Archives.
  109. "PM and U.S. President Obama announce shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness between Canada and the United States". Office of the Prime Minister of Canada. February 4, 2011. Archived from the original on September 10, 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  110. "United States–Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan: Developing and implementing the Joint Action Plan". Washington, D.C.: Office of the Prime Minister of Canada. December 7, 2011. Archived from the original on July 29, 2013.
  111. "Notice: Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Over-the-Counter (OTC) Products: Common Monograph Working Group: Selection of a Monograph for Alignment". Canada's Action Plan. Government of Canada. January 10, 2013. Archived from the original on November 8, 2014. Retrieved February 15, 2013.
  112. "Canada–U.S. border agreement a good thing". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. September 6, 2012.
  113. Jordan, Roger (November 20, 2015). "Trudeau promises Obama an enhanced Canada–US partnership". World Socialist Web Site. International Committee of the Fourth International. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  114. Harris, Kathleen (November 6, 2015). "Justin Trudeau 'disappointed' with U.S. rejection of Keystone XL". CBC News. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  115. Hall, Chris (November 20, 2015). "Trudeau warmly embraced by Obama, but don't expect concessions from U.S." CBC News. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  116. Cullen, Catherine (November 17, 2015). "Justin Trudeau says Canada to increase the number of training troops in Iraq". CBC News. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  117. "Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau set a date for the first meeting in Washington". Toronto Star. The Canadian Press. December 28, 2015. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  118. "Obama welcomes Trudeau to White House, 'About time, eh?'". thestar.com. March 10, 2016. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  119. "Obama on growing friendship with Trudeau – 'What's not to like?'". SWI swissinfo.ch. Archived from the original on March 18, 2016. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  120. Harris, Kathleen (November 10, 2016). "Justin Trudeau invites Donald Trump to visit Canada during the call that marks 'strong beginning'". CBC News. Retrieved November 11, 2016.
  121. "It's Trudeau's move after Trump goes from tough talk to action with lumber duties: Chris Hall". CBC News. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  122. "Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with United States President Donald Trump". Prime Minister of Canada. April 25, 2017. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  123. ^ "Trump Signs Trade Deal With Canada and Mexico". The New York Times. January 29, 2020.
  124. Long, Heather. "The USMCA is finally done. Here's what is in it". Washington Post.
  125. Lea, Brittany De (November 30, 2018). "NAFTA 2.0: What to know". FOXBusiness.
  126. Montes, Juan (February 13, 2019). "Strikes at Low-Wage Plants Signal Revival of Labor Demands in Mexico". Wall Street Journal – via www.wsj.com.
  127. Swanson, Ana; Tankersley, Jim (January 29, 2020). "Trump Just Signed the U.S.M.C.A. Here's What's in the New NAFTA". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  128. "Under USMCA, Canada rolls with 'new NAFTA'". FreightWaves. July 1, 2020. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  129. "'Very dishonest & weak': Trump lashes out at Trudeau following G7 summit". thejournal.ie. Associated Press. June 10, 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
  130. Watkins, Eli (June 10, 2018). "Trump's top economic aide on Trudeau: 'It was a betrayal'". CNN. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
  131. Dangerfield, Katie. "Donald Trump slams Trudeau (again), says PM will cost Canadians a lot of money". Global News. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
  132. "The US is picking a fight with Canada over a thawing Arctic shipping route". Quartz. June 27, 2019.
  133. "Readout of President Joe Biden Call with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada". The White House. January 22, 2021.
  134. "Remarks by President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada Before Virtual Bilateral Meeting". The White House. February 23, 2021.
  135. Vaillancourt, William (November 29, 2024). "Donald Trump Dines With Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago After Tariff Threat". The Daily Beast. Retrieved December 3, 2024.
  136. ^ "Trudeau says Americans are realizing Trump's tariffs on Canada would make life a lot more expensive". ABC News. December 10, 2024.
  137. ^ "Trump's apparent joke about Canada becoming 51st state draws range of reaction in B.C." British Columbia. December 3, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
  138. Panetta, Alexander (December 17, 2024). "Trump trash talks Freeland in blast from her political past". CBC News. Retrieved December 17, 2024.
  139. "Donald Trump says Canada becoming 51st U.S. state is 'a great idea.' Jean Charest calls the comment a 'wake-up call'". CTVNews. December 18, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  140. Crawley, Mike (January 6, 2025). "Trump responds to Trudeau resignation by suggesting Canada merge with U.S." CBC News. Retrieved January 7, 2025.
  141. "Trump says he would use 'economic force' on Canada, not military". CBC News. December 7, 2025.
  142. "Trudeau says 'not a snowball's chance in hell' Canada will join US". www.bbc.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  143. ""Oh Canada": Donald Trump Shares New US Map Amid Controversy". www.ndtv.com.
  144. Mingst, K.; Karns, M.P. (2019). The United Nations In The Post-cold War Era, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis. p. 63. ISBN 978-1-000-30674-3.
  145. Background note on Canada, U.S. State Department
  146. Lennox, Patrick (2009). At Home and Abroad: Canada–US Relationship and Canada's Place in the World. UBC Press. p. 107. ISBN 9780774859073. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  147. Canadian Peace Research Institute (2006). Peace Research. Canadian Peace Research and Education Association. Retrieved November 6, 2015. vol 38 page 8
  148. Webcast Panel Discussion Archived July 4, 2013, at the Wayback Machine "Ties That Bind" at the Pritzker Military Library on August 17, 2012
  149. Romero, Dennis; Alba, Monica (February 12, 2023). "U.S. shoots down the unidentified object in Canadian airspace". nbcnews.
  150. See Congressional Research Service. Canada–U.S. Relations (Congressional Research Service, 2021) 2021 Report, by an agency of the U.S. Congress; Updated February 10, 2021.
  151. "Canada and the Arctic: The Issue of Northern Sovereignty | Wilson Center". www.wilsoncenter.org. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
  152. Pharand, Donat (1989). "Canada's Sovereignty Over the Northwest Passage". Michigan Journal of International Law. 10 (2).
  153. says, Teknoloji Alemi (April 8, 2020). "The U.S. - Canada Northwest Passage Dispute". Brown Political Review. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
  154. Herrmann, Thomas (June 27, 2019). "Shipping Through the Northwest Passage: A Policy Brief". University of Washington. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
  155. Rothwell, Donald R. (1993). "The Canadian-U.S. Northwest Passage Dispute: A Reassessment". Cornell International Law Journal. 26 (2).
  156. Charron, Andrea (2005). "The Northwest Passage: Is Canada's Sovereignty Floating Away?". International Journal. 60 (3): 831–848. doi:10.2307/40204066. ISSN 0020-7020. JSTOR 40204066.
  157. "A Classic Case of Deception — Central Intelligence Agency". www.cia.gov. Archived from the original on February 19, 2013. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  158. Gervais, Marty (March 28, 1981). "Iran Rescue: Our Bashful Heroes". Windsor Star. p. C8. Retrieved February 24, 2013.
  159. "U.S. 'friendly fire' pilot won't face court martial". CBC News. July 6, 2004. Retrieved January 28, 2004.
  160. "Pilots blamed for 'friendly fire' deaths". BBC News. August 22, 2002. Retrieved January 28, 2007.
  161. "CANADIAN NAVY TEAMS UP WITH U.S. CARRIER BATTLE GROUPS". Department of National Defence. September 25, 2006. Archived from the original on April 5, 2007. Retrieved January 28, 2007.
  162. Cox, Wayne S.; Charbonneau, Bruno (2010). Locating Global Order: American Power and Canadian Security After 9/11. UBC Press. p. 119. ISBN 9780774859660. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  163. Harper, Tim (March 22, 2003). "Canadians back Chrétien on war, poll finds". Toronto Star. Retrieved January 12, 2009.
  164. Spector, Norman (November 20, 2006). "Clinton speaks on Afghanistan, and Canada listens". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 28, 2007.
  165. "Ministers Dion and Sajjan meet U.S. special envoy for Global Coalition to Counter ISIL". Global Affairs Canada. October 6, 2016. Archived from the original on October 10, 2016. Retrieved October 10, 2016.
  166. "U.S. warns Canada against easing pot laws". Cbc.ca. May 2, 2003. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  167. Canada, Health (January 23, 2020). "Cannabis laws and regulations". aem. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  168. "ETA Canada Visa Application - Apply for Canadian E-Visa Online".
  169. Miller, Eric (2002). The Outlier Sectors: Areas of Non-free Trade in the North American Free Trade Agreement. BID-INTAL. p. 19. ISBN 9789507381287. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  170. Giddens, David. "How Canada invented 'American' football, baseball, basketball and hockey". CBC Sports.
  171. GMcKeating. "The Embassy of the U.S.A., Ottawa – United States – Canada Relations". Archived from the original on May 27, 2010. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  172. "Clean Air Markets". August 12, 2014. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  173. "Environment and Climate Change Canada – Air – Canada- United States Air Quality Agreement". January 25, 2005. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  174. "Exclusive Interview: Brian Mulroney remembers his friend Ronald Reagan". News.nationalpost.com. February 4, 2011.
  175. Freed, Kenneth; Gerstenzang, James (April 6, 1987). "Mulroney Asks Reagan for Treaty on Acid Rain". Los Angeles Times.
  176. Cassedy, Edward S.; Grossman, Peter Z. (1998). Introduction to Energy: Resources, Technology, and Society. Cambridge U.P. p. 157. ISBN 9780521637671. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  177. "COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION". Archived from the original on May 11, 2015. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  178. "Canada's environment policy to follow the U.S.: Minister". Archived from the original on July 6, 2011. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  179. "Resources – Climate Prosperity". Archived from the original on July 6, 2011. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  180. Montgomery, Marc (October 1, 2015). "Canada has water, the U.S wants it". RCI English. Radio Canada International. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
  181. Michael Rheta Martin (1978). Dictionary of American History: With the Complete Text of the Constitution of the United States. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 227. ISBN 9780822601241. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  182. Murphy, Orville T. (1965). "The Comte De Vergennes, The Newfoundland Fisheries And The Peace Negotiation Of 1783: A Reconsideration". Canadian Historical Review. 46 (1): 32–46. doi:10.3138/chr-046-01-02. S2CID 143808239.
  183. Golladay, V. Dennis (1973). "The United States and British North American Fisheries, 1815–1818". American Neptune. 33 (4): 246–257.
  184. Alvin, C. Gluek Jr (1976). "Programmed Diplomacy: The Settlement of the North Atlantic Fisheries Question, 1907–12". Acadiensis. 6 (1): 43–70.
  185. Kurkpatrick Dorsey (2009). The Dawn of Conservation Diplomacy: U.S.-Canadian wildlife protection treaties in the progressive era. University of Washington Press. p. 19ff. ISBN 9780295989792. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  186. Matthew Carnaghan, Allison Goody, "Canadian Arctic Sovereignty" Archived March 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine (Library of Parliament: Political and Social Affairs Division, January 26, 2006); 2006 news
  187. "Cellucci: Canada should control Northwest Passage". CTV.ca. Archived from the original on February 22, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  188. Histor!ca "Election of 1891: A Question of Loyalty" Archived April 6, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, James Marsh.
  189. Donald Creighton, John A. Macdonald: The Old Chieftain (1955) p. 497
  190. Council on Foreign Relations, Documents on American foreign relations (1957) Volume 9 p 558
  191. John F. Kennedy. Address Before the Canadian Parliament in Ottawa. The American Presidency Project.
  192. "The Embassy of the U.S.A., Ottawa – United States – Canada Relations". Canada.usembassy.gov. Archived from the original on March 23, 2009. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  193. From a speech by Trudeau to the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on March 25, 1969
  194. J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy (1991) p. 51
  195. J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy (1991) p. 195
  196. J. L. Granatstein and Robert Bothwell, Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy (1991) p. 71
  197. "The Rhetoric of 9/11: President George W. Bush – Address to Joint Session of Congress and the American People (9-20-01)". Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  198. Frum, David (September 9, 2011). "David Frum: Why Bush didn't mention Canada in his 9/20 speech". National Post. Retrieved October 12, 2016.
  199. "Statement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper". Office of the Prime Minister of Canada. January 20, 2009. Archived from the original on January 13, 2010. Retrieved January 21, 2009.
  200. "Obama declares love for Canada, banishes Bush era". Reuters. February 19, 2009.
  201. "Remarks by President Biden in Address to the Canadian Parliament". whitehouse.gov. March 24, 2023.
  202. Waugh, Basil (July 7, 2011). "Canadians and Americans are more similar than assumed". News.ubc.ca. Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2016.
  203. "Canadians and Americans think a lot alike". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  204. "United North America". Unitednorthamerica.org. Archived from the original on July 25, 2016. Retrieved July 18, 2016.
  205. "In U.S., Canada Places First in Image Contest; Iran Last". Gallup.com. February 19, 2010. Retrieved February 26, 2011. published in 2010.
  206. Americans Give Record-High Ratings to Several U.S. Allies Gallup
  207. See Jacob Poushter and Bruce Drake, "Americans' views of Mexico, Canada diverge as Obama attends 'Three Amigos' summit" Pew research Center February 19, 2014
  208. "US Image Report" (PDF). June 26, 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 21, 2017.
  209. "World's Approval of U.S. Leadership Drops to New Low". Gallup. January 18, 2018. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  210. ^ "America's Image Abroad Rebounds with Transition from Trump to Biden". June 10, 2021.
  211. David Stephen Heidler and Jeanne T. Heidler, Encyclopedia of the War of 1812 (2004) p. 194
  212. J. L. Granatstein, Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism (1997)
  213. Damien-Claude Bélanger, Prejudice and Pride: Canadian Intellectuals Confront the United States, 1891–1945 (University of Toronto Press, 2011), pp 16, 180
  214. Richard Collins, Culture, Communication, and National Identity: The Case of Canadian Television (U. of Toronto Press, 1990) p. 25
  215. David Meren, "'Plus que jamais nécessaires': Cultural Relations, Nationalism and the State in Canada–Quebec–France Triangle, 1945–1960", Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 2009, Vol. 19 Issue 1, pp 279–305,
  216. ^ Paula Ruth Gilbert, Violence and the Female Imagination: Quebec's Women Writers (2006) p. 114
  217. Groseclose, Barbara S.; Wierich, Jochen (2009). Internationalizing the History of American Art: Views. Penn State Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0271032009. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  218. Glazov, Jamie (2002). Canadian Policy Toward Khrushchev's Soviet Union. McGill-Queens. p. 138. ISBN 9780773522763. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  219. Bumsted, J. M. (1999). Magocsi, Paul (ed.). Encyclopedia of Canada's Peoples. University of Toronto Press. p. 197. ISBN 9780802029386. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  220. Wennersten, John R. (2008). Leaving America: The New Expatriate Generation. Greenwood. p. 44. ISBN 9780313345067. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  221. O'Connor, Brendon (2007). Anti-Americanism: Comparative perspectives. Greenwood. p. 60. ISBN 9781846450266. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  222. Lipset, Seymour Martin (1990). Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Routledge. ISBN 9780415903097. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  223. La Bossière, Camille R. (1994). Context North America: Canadian/U.S. Literary Relations. U. of Ottawa Press. p. 11. ISBN 9780776603605. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  224. "Poll: Deep anti-Bush sentiment in Canada". Arizona Daily Sun. October 20, 2004. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  225. Wike, Richard; Poushter, Jacob; Zainulbhai, Hani (June 29, 2016). "2. Obama's international image remains strong in Europe and Asia". Pewglobal.org.
  226. "Who do Canadians want to vote for? Barack Obama". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  227. "Canadians rooting for Hillary Clinton to become president: poll". Global News. November 6, 2016.
  228. "Majority of Canadians don't trust Trump: Poll". Toronto Sun. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  229. "Nearly 8 in 10 Canadians prefer Dems over Trump; Sanders, Biden most popular: poll". CTV News. July 21, 2019.
  230. Canada, Global Affairs (April 29, 2021). "Embassy of Canada to the United States, in Washington, D.C." GAC.
  231. "Embassy of the United States in Ottawa".

Cited sources

Further reading

Further information: History of Canadian foreign relations § Relations with United States
  • Anderson, Greg; Sands, Christopher (2011). Forgotten Partnership Redux: Canada-U.S. Relations in the 21st Century. Cambria Press. ISBN 978-1-60497-762-2. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  • Azzi, Stephen. Reconcilable Differences: A History of Canada–US Relations (Oxford University Press, 2014)
  • Behiels, Michael D. and Reginald C. Stuart, eds. Transnationalism: Canada–United States History into the Twenty-First Century (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010) 312 pp. online 2012 review
  • Bothwell, Robert. Your Country, My Country: A Unified History of the United States and Canada (2015), 400 pages; traces relations, shared values, and differences across the centuries
  • Boyko, John. Cold fire: Kennedy's northern front (Alfred A. Knopf Canada, 2016)
  • Congressional Research Service. Canada–U.S. Relations (Congressional Research Service, 2021) 2021 Report, by an agency of the U.S. Congress; Updated February 10, 2021
  • Clarkson, Stephen. Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism and the Canadian State (University of Toronto Press, 2002)
  • Doran, Charles F., and James Patrick Sewell, "Anti-Americanism in Canada", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 497, Anti-Americanism: Origins and Context (May 1988), pp. 105–119 in JSTOR
  • Dunning, William Archibald. The British Empire and the United States (1914) online celebratory study by a leading American scholar.
  • Dyment, David "Doing the Continental: A New Canadian-American Relationship" (Dundurn Press, 2010)
  • Engler, YvesThe Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy. Co-published: RED Publishing, Fernwood Publishing. April 2009. ISBN 978-1-55266-314-1.
  • Granatstein, J. L. Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism (1997)
  • Granatstein, J. L. and Norman Hillmer, For Better or for Worse: Canada and the United States to the 1990s (1991)
  • Gravelle, Timothy B. "Partisanship, Border Proximity, and Canadian Attitudes toward North American Integration." International Journal of Public Opinion Research (2014) 26#4 pp: 453–474.
  • Gravelle, Timothy B. "Love Thy Neighbor (u) r? Political Attitudes, Proximity and the Mutual Perceptions of the Canadian and American Publics". Canadian Journal of Political Science (2014) 47#1 pp: 135–157.
  • Greaves, Wilfrid. "Democracy, Donald Trump, and the Canada-US Security Environment". (NAADSN – North American and Arctic Defense Security Network, 2020). online
  • Hacker, Louis M. (March 1924). "Western Land Hunger and the War of 1812: A Conjecture". Mississippi Valley Historical Review. X (4): 365–395. doi:10.2307/1892931. JSTOR 1892931.
  • Hale, Geoffrey. So Near Yet So Far: The Public and Hidden Worlds of Canada-US Relations (University of British Columbia Press, 2012); 352 pages focus on 2001–2011
  • Hillmer, Norman, and Philippe Lagassé, eds. Justin Trudeau and Canadian foreign policy (Springer, 2018) online.
  • Holland, Kenneth. "The Canada–United States defense relationship: a partnership for the twenty-first century". Canadian Foreign Policy Journal ahead-of-print (2015): 1–6. online
  • Holmes, Ken. "The Canadian Cognitive Bias and its Influence on Canada/US Relations". International Social Science Review (2015) 90#1 online.
  • Holmes, John W. "Canadian External Policies since 1945" "International Journal" 18#2 (1963) 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070206301800201 online
  • Holmes, John W. "Impact of Domestic Political Factors on Canadian-American Relations: Canada", International Organization, Vol. 28, No. 4, Canada and the United States: Transnational and Transgovernmental Relations (Autumn, 1974), pp. 611–635 in JSTOR
  • Innes, Hugh, ed. Americanization: Issues for the Seventies (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1972). ISBN 0-07-092943-2; re 1970s
  • Keenleyside, Hugh Ll. Canada and the United States (1929) online
  • Lennox, Patrick. At Home and Abroad: The Canada-U.S. Relationship and Canada's Place in the World (University of British Columbia Press; 2010) 192 pages; the post–World War II period.
  • Little, John Michael. "Canada Discovered: Continental Perceptions of the Roosevelt Administration, 1939–1945", PhD dissertation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p5696-5697
  • Lumsden, Ian, ed. The Americanization of Canada, ed. for the University League for Social Reform (U of Toronto Press, 1970). ISBN 0-8020-6111-7
  • McInnis, Edgard W. The Unguarded Frontier: A History of American-Canadian Relations (1942) online; well-regarded older study
  • MacKenzie, Scott A. "But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War" American Review of Canadian Studies (2017): online
  • McKercher, Asa. Camelot and Canada: Canadian-American Relations in the Kennedy Era (Oxford UP, 2016). xii, 298 pp. 1960-1963.
  • Molloy, Patricia. Canada/US and Other Unfriendly Relations: Before and After 9/11 (Palgrave Macmillan; 2012) 192 pages; essays on various "myths"
  • Mount, Graeme S. and Edelgard Mahant. Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies toward Canada during the Cold War (1999)
  • Mount, Graeme S. and Edelgard Mahant. ''An Introduction to Canadian-American Relations (2nd ed.1989)
  • Myers, Phillip E. Dissolving Tensions: Rapprochement and Resolution in British-American-Canadian Relations in the Treaty of Washington Era, 1865–1914 (Kent State UP, 2015). x, 326 pp.
  • Pacheco, Daniela Pereira. "Politics on Twitter: a comparison between Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau". (ICSCP 2020). online
  • Paltiel, Jeremy. "Canada's middle-power ambivalence: The palimpsest of US power under the Chinese shadow". in America's Allies and the Decline of US Hegemony (Routledge, 2019) pp. 126–140.
  • Pederson, William D. ed. A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt (2011) pp 517–41, covers FDR's policies
  • Stagg, J.C.A. (2012). The War of 1812: Conflict for a Continent. Cambridge Essential Histories. ISBN 978-0-521-72686-3.
  • Stoett, Peter J. "Fairweather Friends? Canada–United States Environmental Relations in the Days of Trump and the Era of Climate Change". in Canada–US Relations (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019) pp. 105–123.
  • Stuart, Reginald C. Dispersed Relations: Americans and Canadians in Upper North America (2007) excerpt and text search
  • Tagg, James. "'And, We Burned down the White House, Too': American History, Canadian Undergraduates, and Nationalism", The History Teacher, 37#3 (May 2004), pp. 309–334 in JSTOR
  • Tansill, C. C. Canadian-American Relations, 1875–1911 (1943)
  • Thompson, John Herd, and Stephen J. Randall. Canada and the United States: Ambivalent Allies (4th ed. McGill-Queen's UP, 2008), 387pp
  • Wrong, Hume, and John W. Holmes. "The Canada–United States Relationship 1927/1951". International Journal 31#3 (1976): 529–45. The Canada–United States Relationship 1927/1951 online

Trade and tariffs

  • Ciuriak, Dan, How U.S. Trade Policy Has Changed Under President Donald Trump – Perceptions From Canada (SSRN, March 29, 2019). online or How U.S. Trade Policy Has Changed Under President Donald Trump – Perceptions From Canada
  • Georges, Patrick. "Canada's Trade Policy Options under Donald Trump: NAFTA's rules of origin, Canada US security perimeter, and Canada's geographical trade diversification opportunities". (Working Paper #1707E Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, 2017). online
  • Grey, Earl. The Commercial Policy of the British Colonies and the McKinley Tariff (London: Macmillan, 1892). online
  • Lawder, Robert H. Commerce between the United States & Canada, Observations on Reciprocity and the McKinley Tariff (Toronto: Monetary Times Printing, 1892). online
  • Muirhead, Bruce. "From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock", American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 34, 2004
  • Palen, Marc-William. "Protection, federation, and union: The global impact of the McKinley tariff upon the British Empire, 1890–94". Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 38.3 (2010): 395–418 online.
  • Rioux, Hubert. "Canada First vs. America First: Economic Nationalism and the Evolution of Canada–US Trade Relations". European Review of International Studies 6.3 (2019): 30–56. online

Primary sources

External links

Canada Canada–United States relations United States
Diplomatic posts
Diplomacy
Incidents
Military relations
Economic relations
Border
Related
Category:Canada–United States relations
Foreign relations of Canada
Bilateral relations
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Historical
Multilateral relations
Regions
Organizations
Diplomacy and other topics
History
Trade
Diplomacy
United States Foreign relations of the United States
Bilateral relations
Africa
Central
East
North
Southern
West
Americas
Caribbean
Central
Northern
South
Asia
Central
East
South
Southeast
Western
Europe
Eastern
Northern
Southern
Western
Oceania
Australasia
Melanesia
Micronesia
Polynesia
Former states
Multilateral relations
Doctrines, policies, concepts
Presidential
doctrines
Other doctrines
Policies and
concepts
Trilateral relations of Canada, Mexico, and the United States
North American integration
Enacted Treaties
Official bodies
Active
Defunct
Lobby groups
Theorized projects
Miscellaneous
Categories: