| Revision as of 15:13, 8 December 2009 editWeaponbb7 (talk | contribs)4,369 edits →POV opinion commentary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:07, 14 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,839,500 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
| (127 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | |||
| {{Not a forum}} | |||
| {{Article history | |||
| |action1=AFD | |||
| |action1date=29 December 2009 | |||
| |action1link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/New England Institute of Religious Research | |||
| |action1result=Keep | |||
| |action1oldid= | |||
| ⚫ | |dykentry=... that the co-founder of the ''']''' was a court-appointed guardian of 13 children removed from a religious sect in ]? | ||
| |dykdate=20 September 2009 | |||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes | |||
| |class=Start|1 = | |||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Low}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low|NRM=yes|NRMImp=Mid}} | ||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| Line 6: | Line 23: | ||
| |archive = Talk:New England Institute of Religious Research/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:New England Institute of Religious Research/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| {{notaforum}} | |||
| {{WikiProjectBanners | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | {{ |
||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| == Removed |
== Removed tag == | ||
| ⚫ | Removed tag, unless there are other specific suggestions for improvement. ''']''' (]) 07:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == External links modified (February 2018) == | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720073813/http://www.cultinfobooks.com/infoserv_events/2004/aff_conference_2004_06AB_presenters%20.htm to http://www.cultinfobooks.com/infoserv_events/2004/aff_conference_2004_06AB_presenters%20.htm | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
| *{{cite web | title=Bob Pardon to the Rescue| work=The Boston Phoenix | url=http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/02977842.htm | accessdate=2009-10-29 }} | |||
| Recent changes to the article do not appear to be supported by this given source. ''']''' (]) 18:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : = Info not supported by cited source was added back again by {{user|Weaponbb7}}, I then left a message at the user's talk page . ''']''' (]) 18:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Cirt i commend you for trying to keep the page clean of misinformation, Any page that is about NRM requires constant vigilance. as to my particular criticism on whether it is a research group or anti-cult ministry, i understand you concern with me labeling this group to discredit it. however hear is the quote | |||
| "Andrew Walsh, a religious historian at Trinity College in Hartford, finds this troubling. "I’m by no means an expert on cults," Walsh says. "I wouldn’t go around saying that what Robert Pardon does is bad for people. But what’s interesting to me is that he got an awful lot of mileage out of being a ‘cult expert’ while not being open about that fact that he is religious himself. His group sounds academic and nonprofit-y, and he presents it that way because if he called it the Anti-Cult Ministry, people wouldn’t call him, judges wouldn’t call him. It seemed to me that he positioned himself as a kind of free agent able to comment objectively about the case, and journalists just ate that up and gave him oceans of ink without saying who he was." | |||
| i also intend to use an article from the Academic Journal for additional criticism "Religion in the News" http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/csrpl/RINVol3No3/cult_fighting.htm | |||
| i also intend to find the source you used yourself as a source: Eileen, McNamara (February 3, 2002). "Investigator on a Mission". The Boston Globe (Globe Newspaper Company): p. B1. | |||
| the issue i find with this page is its seems unbalanced i am attempting to add balance currently. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :Again - source does not support the changes you made. And then you also made changes further down the page of the article not supported by any sources. ''']''' (]) 18:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::'''' = this admission by {{user|Weaponbb7}} is particularly troubling. ''']''' (]) 18:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| entirely false totally taken out of context, all i meant was i understand that Cirt beleives me to be trying to discredit the Neirr, i am merely using that states that the gorup masquerades as non-profit while actually ministering to these "brainwashed" indivisuals. To call it a research group is laughable this guy attacks the unitarians as a cult mormons and Baha'i. the board of the orginzation consists of nearly entirley Reverends along with a therapist and lawyer hardly academic ] (]) 20:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The talk page is not here for you to present your personal opinion of what you think of the organization. ''']''' (]) 01:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
| == POV opinion commentary == | |||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 23:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| : = sources do ''not'' support changes. ''']''' (]) 22:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| # | |||
| # | |||
| # | |||
| It would seem from these repeated virtually identical style of edit behavior that it is a singular goal of the account {{user|Weaponbb7}} to change the lede definition of the organization from the NPOV "research group" to the POV-pushing "anti-cult ministry". ''']''' (]) 22:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The Group never identifies itself as a Research Group But rather a "]" and uses the "Another important dimension of Institute ministry" later in the same paragraph of the Who We are section "NEIRR is deeply grateful to all those who have helped this ministry". the neutrality of the article is also in question the whole article sounds like an advertisement to me The article i used the first time i had confused as the article i just used. ] (]) 22:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Every single one of your edits appears to be with the singular intention of attempting to denigrate this existing organization, in some cases with info from dubious sources, and as shown above, in some cases with information ''not'' backed up to any sources. ''']''' (]) 06:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yup, yet again having to fix some of this new material which was both not NPOV and not in accordance with the sources it purported to cite. ''']''' (]) 07:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : I do not try to try to "denigrate" this organization any more than i think you try to "promote" the organization by contributing only positive information. A simple google search turns up criticism or rather "outside the mainstream views" the institute holds, I have only used articles I have perceived as valid. You have cherry picked statements made on this page to try and to imply COI to discourage me to from editing the article. I have referred this mutual disagreement on the exact nature of the Institute to ] hopefully to try to resolve this disagreement. ] (]) 14:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you check the format of the article prior to your arrival, you will see that I actually did include negative material, for example ] commentary. However, I agree that ] is an appropriate way to go for now. ''']''' (]) 14:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I am glad you see it as criticism there are number of people who would consider it a endorsement of the organization by the AP | |||
Latest revision as of 05:07, 14 February 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New England Institute of Religious Research article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about New England Institute of Religious Research. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about New England Institute of Religious Research at the Reference desk. |
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 20, 2009.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the co-founder of the New England Institute of Religious Research was a court-appointed guardian of 13 children removed from a religious sect in Attleboro, Massachusetts? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removed tag
Removed tag, unless there are other specific suggestions for improvement. Cirt (talk) 07:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New England Institute of Religious Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720073813/http://www.cultinfobooks.com/infoserv_events/2004/aff_conference_2004_06AB_presenters%20.htm to http://www.cultinfobooks.com/infoserv_events/2004/aff_conference_2004_06AB_presenters%20.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- Start-Class New religious movements articles
- Mid-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles