Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:49, 9 December 2009 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits →Conclusions: Marking as closed and archiving. Everyone tagged.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:05, 3 August 2021 edit undoYleventa2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users683 edits Undid revision 1036998743 by Yleventa2 (talk)Tag: Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|Scibaby}} {{SPIarchive notice|Scibaby}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}

===== <big>Report date December 8 2009, 08:40 (UTC)</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
* {{checkuser|1=Plumerary}}
* {{checkuser|1=Bealhyg}}
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##-->
* {{checkuser|1=Price to Pay}}

* {{checkuser|1=Fern360}}
* {{checkuser|1=HanJShul}}
* {{checkuser|1=Riley Ralston}}
* {{checkuser|1=Wejer}}

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->

The usual pattern of behaviour on ] and other climate-related articles; brand-new accounts, created within an hour of each other, evidently familiar with Misplaced Pages and making a series of dovetailing edits in a pattern very typical of Scibaby. -- ] (]) 08:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->

Added ] - see contributions. --] (]) 08:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Added ] - looks like a sleeper too me, a few bursts of activity, nearly all minor edits, and now on ] with elaborate if unreliably sourced comments. --] (]) 11:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] (]) </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->

Added Fern360, HanJShul and Riley Ralston, completely new accounts that jump right into the typical patterns. --] (]) 08:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>======
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small>
<!-- PLEASE NOTE: CheckUsers *will not* read excessively long arguments in this section. Please consider this when starting an argument with someone -->

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======

======<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>======
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | Checked }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by ] (]) 15:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes
D - 3RR with socks
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run -->
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->
*Hmm...maybe. Not totally convinced on this, but it certainly could be possible. {{Endorse}}. <font color="navy">''']</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 10:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
*{{Confirmed}} they are socks, about 6 accounts on that IP (all blocked), likely to be Scibaby. ] 14:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
*{{confirmed}} Pricetopay, Fern, Riley, HanJ and also {{userlinks|Zooktan}}. Insufficient evidence at this time to check Wejer. ] 14:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
**Since Wejer was just blocked, I checked, and he is {{unrelated}}. ] 15:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
***I can confirm that behavioral evidence also indicates Wejer is not Scibaby. ] (]) 15:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>======
{{SPIclose|archive}}
----

Latest revision as of 23:05, 3 August 2021

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user: