| Revision as of 13:37, 11 December 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive 2.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:26, 8 April 2023 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,573,892 edits Replacing/removing expired templates: {{Show by date}} (please review this edit) | ||
| (950 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <br clear="all/> | |||
| <p style="font-size:3em; text-align:center; margin-bottom:0.2em">]</p> | |||
| ⚫ | {{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}} | ||
| ] | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 3 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(1d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == RE: reverting ] == | |||
| ⚫ | {{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}} | ||
| Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| ==Re:hanging editor's comment== | |||
| By now you probably noticed that I am not the only one reverting your edits. Be forewarned that I do not intend to continue doing so, one more revert and the issue goes to ANI. The fact that you are acting unilaterally is not a good sign, try establishing a consensus. Your constant "name calling" won't help you either. - ] 10:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| What the heck, when you are right, you are right. ] (]) | |||
| :Here's the site-wide consensus: ]. Really, you're no familiar with our non-free police and practices (you are the one repeating that bit about ]#8 on all nominations, aren't you?). Don't try to learn that from the Marine's guy. He's a great article writer but have poor knowledge of our polices. | |||
| :I would not object if you want to ask third part opinions on either ] or ] or somewhere else. That could come out to be enlightening for you. --] 12:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Top Banana == | |||
| ::Damiens: you are talking to editors who have been, in some cases, involved with wikipedia since 2001. None of us are newcomers. A significant number of those involved are also administrators in good standing. Perhaps going to ] or ] will be enlightening, but to you. | |||
| You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. '']'' (]) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Joyeux Noël== | |||
| ::That said, in the interest of good faith, let me do an extensive commentary on the recent request for deletion you have made. | |||
| {| class="toccolours" align="center" style="clear: both; | |||
| ::First, you are correct that none of the images are free. Second, you are mostly correct in treating them separately, as they are mostly distinct images (you could have treated the politician's as one, but thats a detail). Thirdly, you are also correct in invoking ], as this is entirely within its purpose. Fourthly, I will treat the images as one for the purpose of this commentary, but will point out the differences when applicable. Fifthly, I admit openly I have trouble assuming good faith in this case, however, trouble doesn't mean not assuming it - I wouldn't take this time to write this if I didn't think it was somehow worth it. | |||
| |align="center" |] | |||
| !bgcolor="#ccccff" |<font=3>Les vœux de vous <br>"Joyeux Noël et Bonne année"</font><br>(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)<br>] (])<br> | |||
| |align="center" |] | |||
| |} | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| ::That said, lets see ]'s Ten Points of Inclusion, and how they apply: | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| # '''No free equivalent.''' - An entire wikiproject in good standing is telling you: we looked, and no dice. This ''does'' count for something. Ask around. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| # '''Respect for commercial opportunities.''' - no of the images fail this criteria. In fact, all of the images have intrinsic historic value to illustrate either events or people. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| # '''Minimal usage.''' the images are low-res and they are for the most part cropped from the originals. | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| # '''Previous publication.''' all of the images have been used by multiple authors and editors to illustrate similar topics in multiple publicly available websites and publications. | |||
| # '''Content.''' all of the images are deeply encyclopedic and enrich our knowledge of the subject illustrated | |||
| # '''Media-specific policy.''' all images meet this criteria. | |||
| # '''One-article minimum.''' images are used in at least one article and not orphans. | |||
| # '''Contextual significance.''' the images' presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. | |||
| # '''Restrictions on location.''' images are only in articles | |||
| # '''Image description page.''' there was one image incorrectly identified as PD (although being from 1924 it means it will shortly become PD, so this was probably a mistake in good faith) The editor fixed this when pointed out. You have described the alternative rationale as "imbecile" - them fightin' words! Without getting into how in-artful such language is in productive discussion, it is true that reasonable people can disagree on criteria. However, all of the criteria provided fits around the above nine points. I do not see how could it possibly be described as "imbecile", except by means of either lacking good faith, or a failure to assume good faith. Please ponder this. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ::I hope this serves to illustrate why your invocation of ] in this case actually contradicts your charges. All of these images enhance the reader's understanding and knowledge of the topic discussed, and in particular, serve to give context. They are meet the legal criteria of fair-use, such as not limiting commercial exploitation on the part of copyright holders or being used for purposes other than those claimed for fair use. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ::Ultimately, I think that you need to be less arrogant in your approach, and assume that other editors, in particular editors with long-standing commitment to the encyclopedia, also know what they are talking about. Just because we are brown and speak English as a second language, doesn't mean we are stupid. --] (]) 17:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :::I'll try to be short and concise: | |||
| </div> | |||
| ::::* '''No free equivalent''' - I honestly doubted all the members of the project are searching for freely equivalents even after a non-free images is used in the article. In ffd discussion I've seen several cases of images deemed irreplaceable to have freely equivalents found, sometimes by the original uploader himself. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 --> | |||
| ::::* ''''''Respect for commercial opportunities.''' - We can only assert an images passes this criteria once we know the images copyright holder (there's a lot of difference in a riot picture owned by my grandpa and by Reuters). Many of the images used in those articles are, for instance, "sourced" to latinamericanstudies.org, that's a website that will use any image it sees fit without ever crediting the copyright holder (it's otherwise a great site). | |||
| ::::* '''Minimal usage.''' Using a headshout of a boxer is an article as broad as ] is not minimal use, for instance | |||
| ::::* '''Contextual significance.''' - This is the main problem. How, for instance, is the understanding of ] compromised by the lack of a P&B picture of a ]? | |||
| ::::* '''Image description page.''' - Rationales are supposed to explain why the specific article would suffer (and be harder to grasp) without the visual aid of the specific picture. Marine's rationales mostly fall short of that. (And as a side note: no, Work published in 1924 will not be in the public domain anytime soon. See ]). | |||
| :::I found it amusing to call my attitude arrogant while still asking for a special treatment for the elder editors of wikipedia. I don't care about the color of your skin or your ability with any language. Stop vitmizing yourself, or trying to find some hidden agenda. My agenda is ], and I'm sure its yours as well. See you. --] 18:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I only made the appeal based upon your implication that we are ignorant and hence needed "enlightenment" in ]. If your sole concern is ], you are making a very bad job in showing it; drive-by ethnic-targeting such as what you are doing is a sport of certain editors who certainly disdain 5P. Try to be more, you know, encyclopedic and helpful rather than destructive. For example, try to find free alternatives before claiming non-free images are replaceable. --] (]) 09:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Per our own policy we don't have to find free alternatives to establish an image is replaceable. --] 10:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Our own policy also calls upon us to ignore all rules if they keep us from improving the encyclopedia. And this policy is the core policy of wikipedia. Your actions for the most part, do not improve the encyclopedia, but make it less. Consider that. | |||
| ::::::It does more to improve the encyclopedia to find a replacement free image to a non-free image than to delete the non-free image being used under fair-use. In particular, when speaking about documentary history and biographical subjects with limited potential for commercial exploitation - which is the basis of fair-use under copyright laws. | |||
| ::::::It is evident to me that you are not taking the time to actually understand why many of these images are to be included under fair use. For example, Manuel Rojas' house is ''not'' just some "house in the woods", but has the same historic value of say, Abraham Lincoln's log cabin. This doesn't mean some of the points you make are valid, for example some of the images (like the headshot you mention in Sports in Puerto Rico). It just means that you assumed some sort of bad faith and arrogance, and that is not productive. | |||
| ::::::What is really nasty and generates so much drama is that you completely ignored the existence of a Wikiproject for Puerto Rico, and instead of attempting to engage us, you started just requesting deletion. We could have worked out the issues like editors assuming good faith. Going directly to deletion ] of ]. If you are so worried about 5P, follow them by trusting your editors to do the right thing by engaging them.--] (]) 01:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::What was really nasty was that the Wikiproject for Puerto Rico completely ignored the existence of a ]. Now live through your own drama. I'm tired.--] 02:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Request == | |||
| Damiens, listen I took care of the "painter" image per what you pointed out. I have a request and that is that you please withdrawal the nomination of ]. The cited source belongs to the Puerto Rico Air Guard which in fact is under the jurisdiction of the United States Air Force. Puerto Rico being a U.S. territory among many other things cannot have an Armed Force per Federal Law. The Federal Government of the United States rules here and the Commander in Chief of Puerto Rico's Guard is the President of the U.S., that is why there are troops of the guard right now in Iraq. The governor of Puerto Rico only has the authority to use the guard in national emergencies. A lot of people do not understand the political relationship between the U.S. and Puerto Rico and do not realize that the island has little to say when it comes to military and commercial aspects which are governed by the U.S. I posted an explanation in the deletion page. Thank you ] (]) 15:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Which cited source are you referring to? The book or the Picasa Web Album? Which one you're saying belongs to the Puerto Rico Air Guard? And how can I verify this information? --] 15:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh, my god! I feel ashamed for you. When the says (in the right) the image "''Belongs to Guardia Nacional Aérea de P. R.''", it's actually say the picture belongs to an . But that was funny, I have to admit. --] 15:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Damn, I didn't notice the album thing, I feel ashamed . Even though after fully reviewing the album, it is obvious that album owner does not own the copyright to the majority of the photos which were taken while some of the subjects were in active military duty. However, it would be best just to delete it, which I will. Maybe, a less colorful replacement from the "Historia Militar de Puerto Rico" would do. ] (]) 23:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:PD or not PD == | |||
| The book sites it as an Air Force image, but when I uploaded the picture under image from a "book" that format came-up and I thought that it was needed for where the image is going to be used. I do see your point as to the confussion created. I'll do what I hope to be the proper fix. ] (]) 18:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| Your actions are being discussed ] --] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 21:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == you are being discussed == | |||
| at | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Uninvolved_Admin_Requested:_User:Damiens.rf_multiple_JPG_deletions_and_related_matters | |||
| ] (]) 21:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 8 April 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
RE: reverting Jason Narvy
Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/
Re:hanging editor's comment
What the heck, when you are right, you are right. Tony the Marine (talk)
Top Banana
You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. Antonio Camilo Martin (dime aca) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Joyeux Noël
|
<font=3>Les vœux de vous "Joyeux Noël et Bonne année" (Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year) Tony the Marine (talk) |
|
|---|
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)