Revision as of 17:48, 14 December 2009 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →Suggestion for positive collaboration: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:08, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,141,424 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} | |||
== Apology == | |||
== ] == | |||
My comments lately to you have been a bit brusque, and I want to apologize for that. I am sorry, ''']''' (]) 09:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692039973 --> | |||
*{{la|Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry}} | |||
Prior to my edit at that article two hours prior to yours, you had never edited it before. Curious how you came by this page and reverted my edit there? ''']''' (]) 16:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I did not revert your edit ... I corrected what seemed to be a mistake. You removed a recent PROD but you also removed a notability tag along with it. That tag has been up for years and notability has not been established in the entry. As to your curiosity don't you have better things to do? Maybe we can discuss my semi-retired tag again as well while we're at it. You should concern yourself with editing the encyclopedia and doing so with care and not with why an editor has made his first edit to a page within a general subject area he's clearly interested in. Regards.] (]) 16:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::This is not an answer to my question. ''']''' (]) 16:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::No it is not. I don't need to answer your question and I find this, much like your comment about my tag, to be annoying. If you want to provide the diff of me editing that page in the future as evidence that I'm stalking your edits ... which is clearly what you're implying ... then be my guest. I really don't care what conclusions you want to draw from this. In the meantime stop harassing me with these personal questions, none of which have anything to do with improving the encyclopedia. Regards.] (]) 16:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::It is indeed a valid concern. You have shown up on at least three pages where you have previously never edited before, on articles I have either created or edited shortly before your arrival there. ''']''' (]) 16:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::] is that way. Finding the NEIRR entry had nothing to do with you or your edits. ] was linked to within that entry in a manner lending notability to NEIRR. I will be honest with you about the fact the creation of and defense of those entries is troubling for a variety of reasons related to the general disregard of Misplaced Pages content guidelines due to what appears to be a well known agenda of yours and this did in fact lead me to look at your contribution history and take interest in a related topic -- the very same you just asked me about. If that is actionable then like I said ] is that way, but for the love of God stop harassing me. I'm not on your talk page asking you about your edits or your motivations am I? I'm at content areas arguing about the content. I suggest you do the same.] (]) 17:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Suggestion for positive collaboration == | |||
Perhaps it would be more enjoyable for you to collaborate with me in research and writing on a topic unrelated to religion, instead of following me around Misplaced Pages. Do you like ] ? The content challenge ] is quite fun, and maybe you and I could work together to improve an article related to the topic? ''']''' (]) 17:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 23 November 2015
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)