Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wuhwuzdat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:20, 7 January 2010 editRjanag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,857 edits →Please do not misuse db-nonsense: oops, didn't realize you were perfect← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:55, 22 April 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,899 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Wuhwuzdat/Archive 5) (botTag: Manual revert 
(829 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} {{bots|deny=SineBot}}
{{semi-retired}}
]
<hr><hr><hr>
<!-- {{tmbox <!-- {{tmbox
|image = ] |image = ]
Line 5: Line 8:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 3 |counter = 5
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
Line 39: Line 42:
{{archive box|auto=yes}} {{archive box|auto=yes}}


== Some advice == == note to self ==


<!-- ]
I noticed your template on ], and I'd like to ask that when dealing with situations of a sensitive nature—for example, an article that is deemed inaccurate by its subject—you take a few minutes to write a hand-written, informative, and polite note rather than slapping a generic boilerplate message on them. It really makes it more welcoming and less confusing for new editors. Thanks. &ndash;''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 18:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
]
] -->Remind yourself to look under a rock


== IT IS NOT VANDALISM! == == Providing a link to an article ==


http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Do_not_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point
See, there's ], ], ], and all the stuff in ]. I WAS TRYING TO CREATE AN ARTICLE BUT WAS TOLD I DID IT WRONG SO I WON'T TRY TO MAKE IT AGAIN. ] (]) 07:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
:Hmm, your vandalism pages, tagged by me as vandalism, were deleted as vandalism. I'd say they were vandalism. Now please go find ], before you get banned here. ]]] 07:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


== Please do not misuse db-nonsense ==


== Community ban: nominating articles for deletion ==
] was not ]; a better tag would have been {{tlx|db-bio}} (A7). For more information on what does and does not count as nonsense, see ]. <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 21:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

*Others would disagree with you, check the deletion log for the page, just 3 minutes previous.....and my tagging was on the 1st deletion. The pages auther recreated it, complete with the speedy tag. ]]] 21:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Per community discussion at ] (), you have been indefinitely banned from nominating articles for deletion through any means, including ], ] and ]. You are permitted to participate in deletion discussions that have been launched by somebody else. Although several participants in the conversation felt that an expiration of six months might be appropriate, there was insufficient consensus to put an endpoint on the ban, which will remain in effect until successfully appealed. Please review ]. --] <sup>]</sup>
**Yeah, I know (got into an edit conflict with Friday while deleting it); the fact that he deleted it per G1 doesn't mean G1 is right, it probably just means he was in a hurry and didn't bother to change the deletion summary to A7. The article is quite clearly not patent nonsense. (Patent nonsense looks more like
a;dlsfjghaproigha;rlhjfad;lgah
). <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 21:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
:Whatever. I'm not about to get into a pissing match, or other endless debate, about the proper way to ], lets just agree that the page needed flushing, and move on. Doing otherwise will just leave us wondering what the terrible smell is. ]]] 21:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
::I'm not trying to, either. But if you want to do speedy tagging, doing it right makes the admins' job easier. There is a reason there are different tags for different things. <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 21:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
:::If I "Want to do"? I might suggest you review my previous edits, as a vast majority of them are speedy taggings, or other new page patrolling. Approximately 11,000 deleted edits, most ''( >90% I would estimate)'' of which were speedy taggings. Not bragging, just establishing that I'm not new at this. ]]] 22:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
::::Sorry, I didn't realize you were too great at this to ever make a mistake or ever have anything new to learn. My apologies for criticizing a perfect editor. <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 00:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:55, 22 April 2024

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.

PAGE RULES:

  • 1) A new topic requires a new section.
  • 2) New sections go at the bottom of this page.
  • 3) New sections require titles.
  • 4) New replies go underneath the post they are in reply to.
  • 5) Sign your posts by typing ~~~~. (Sinebot doesn't work here)
    • (please sign at the END of your posts, not at the beginning!)
  • 6) Posts must be coherent and civil.

I reserve the right to delete, without response, any and every posting from people unwilling or unable to obey these simple requests.Per this guideline.

If your post is in reference to an article, it would be greatly appreciated if you would provide a link to the article in question.

If you are here to tell me you changed or declined a speedy delete tag that you disagreed with, feel free to NOT leave me a note.

I respect your opinion, experience, and judgment on this matter.

I also irrevocably agreed to release my contributions under the GFDL, and that includes the speedy delete tags!

If you still feel that leaving a comment on one of these matter is truly necessary, I ask that you check the edit history of the article in question, and view the version of the page as it existed AT THE TIME I TAGGED IT, before leaving your comment. (Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball, and I am not a psychic, and can not and will not be held responsible for actions that occurred after the fact).

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

note to self

Remind yourself to look under a rock

Providing a link to an article

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Do_not_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point


Community ban: nominating articles for deletion

Per community discussion at WP:ANI (), you have been indefinitely banned from nominating articles for deletion through any means, including WP:PROD, WP:CSD and WP:AFD. You are permitted to participate in deletion discussions that have been launched by somebody else. Although several participants in the conversation felt that an expiration of six months might be appropriate, there was insufficient consensus to put an endpoint on the ban, which will remain in effect until successfully appealed. Please review Misplaced Pages:Banning policy. --Moonriddengirl