Misplaced Pages

User:Ed Poor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:57, 19 March 2002 editEd Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,217 edits temporarily postponing any edits to controversial topics← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:45, 7 December 2024 edit undoEd Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,217 editsm Biography: widow 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Boxboxtop|Userboxes}}
I live and work in New York City as a software engineer and am interested in science, history, music and religion.
]
I am a member of the ] and believe there is an absolute standard of right and wrong, although I do not claim full knowledge of what that standard is.
{{user Wikipedian for|year=2001|month=11|day=29}}
I like to create stub pages. They're better than nothing, and they attract writers.
{{User Ten Year Society}}
----
{{User remembers typewriter}}
After comments by SR and April, I am temporarily postponing any edits to controversial topics such as ] and the ]-]-]-] issue.
{{Master Editor III}}
My own ethical principles forbid me to entertain a double-standard or otherwise to act hypocritically.
{{Boxbottom}}I was one of the first 200 people to contribute regularly to Misplaced Pages, and I've served as a Mediator, an Admin, and a Bureaucrat.
I need some time to sort this out.
The {{tl|birth date and age}} template I created is used on over 700,000 Misplaced Pages pages, and was the major motivation for parser extensions (to reduce load on the server caused by the first version).


I find Misplaced Pages a useful resource, but it's not very well-written and is often inaccurate. Almost every time I dip into its pages, I find something that urgently needs fixing, and a few topics have unresolvable bias.
I have frequently made sweeping generalizations and often have failed to attribute a point of view to its proponent, giving the impression that it is a generally accepted viewpoint (when it's merely my own belief).


==Customs and practices of Misplaced Pages==
I like debate, especially if it helps us reach consensus. I don't mind if people call me names, but I try to avoid ]. Sometimes, however, I focus more on "winning" the debate than on improving the article about which we are debating, which is counter-productive.
----
Nice catch on ] last week, by the way. ]
----
''From old ] article''


*] (5 pillars)
I've decided that my bias is not an insuperable obstacle to my participation in Misplaced Pages.
*] (essay)
*]
*] (editing guideline)


Shortcuts:
However, I no longer think that the Misplaced Pages can be a useful resource for resolving controversies. At best, it can be a starting point for someone researching a controversial subject such as ] or ]. If my fellow Wikipedians will allow me to link from articles on "settled" issues to other articles outlining objections by skeptics, I will be satisfied.
*] - how to guide
*] - What return can I make?
*] => Surmountable problems in an article should be fixed (don't delete the article)
*] - Catch once and leave.
*] - how to rebut specious deletion arguments


==Reminders==
I do not wish to place the Misplaced Pages imprimatur on my viewpoints or to abuse the Misplaced Pages for advocacy. But I think it's useful to the general reader if viewpoints, even if wildly different and seemingly false are described. The alternative is censorship.


*provide 3 examples of ]s which SOME PEOPLE said resulted in (a) more gov't revenue or (b) an economic boom
Perhaps one effective way to incorporate veering points of view such as ] or environmental skepticism is to link from main articles (e.g., evolution and global warming) to articles about alternative views. We did that successfully with feminism and ] -- at least, the vandalism of ] stopped. This way, the main article on a belief would be from the point of view of its adherents, and articles about alternative beliefs would also be included. Thus ] can keep its "scientists generally believe" viewpoint, while another article, possibly entitled ], could outline objections to the generally accepted theory. -- Ed
*:But be sure to distinguish between tax-rate cuts (like 35% down to 25%) and "tax cuts" (i.e., reducing gov't revenue)
----
Deprecated:


*] - only sunlight, and not sunspots or solar wind?
''I am suspending my participation in Misplaced Pages indefinitely, due to a conflict of interest. I think I may be abusing the concept of NPOV to cloak my own desire to advocate the points of view I believe to be right.
*:So in the climate section of this page, heaven help me for saying this, we should note that variations in the solar magnetic field & solar wind may cause an impact to cosmic rays hitting the earth. However, I stand by my assertion that this page should be mostly about solar variation (the actual physical changes to the sun) and that the terrestrial climate topic and climate change and other impacts of the sun on the earth should be handled in their respective pages with only summaries here.
*] - article split?
*] - Reorganize if no objection


*] ‎ (page move + section for modern controversies)
Now, I might actually be right on several or even all of the points I advocate. The question, though, is not whether I am right but whether my advocacy of these points fits in with the purposes that Larry and Jimbo have in mind for the Misplaced Pages. -- Ed Poor''
----
Software Engineer, father of two. Interested in philosophy, science, pizza, music, children, and world peace -- not necessarily in that order.
----
Mistakes I've made (thanks for catching 'em!):


*] ‎ (→Clarifications: more discussion of long-term studies)
I made a mildly offensive joke in a discussion with Wesley, who graciously and patiently explained my error. Thanks, Wesley. (I guess the lesson for me is not to be such a wise guy, especially if I have a "poor" sense of humor.)


*] ‎ (page move)
I erroneously wrote that the ] was known for its leftist bias. I guess that would be like saying sharks were "known" for being wet. Thanks, Larry, I stand corrected.
----


==Some articles I created==
Stubs I started (which then blossomed due to others) include:
:]


Most of these have been extensively modified by others, per {{afd star|WP:TEAMWORK}}, which - duh! - is the main point of a {{afd star|wiki}}.
Among my contributions are:
:], ], ],
:]


Star* means someone tried to get the article deleted. Dagger means they tried twice!
I have mucked around with:
:], ], ], ],
:]
:]


===Recent===
I love science but am only a ].
#'']''
#{{afd star|War on Women}}, political slogan (deleted, then revived)
#{{afd star|Contraceptive mandate (United States)}}
#{{afd star|Illegal guns}} => ]
#{{afd star|Sexism in academia}}
#{{afd star|Women in combat}}, spun off from ]
#{{afd star|Combat Exclusion Policy}}
#{{afd star|Seaman's Manslaughter Statute}}
#{{afd star|Abandonment of ship }}
#{{afd star|Misplaced Pages:Superlatives}}
#{{tl|Korean age}}
#{{tl|Before date}}
#{{afd star|Mosques near the World Trade Center}}
#{{afd star|List of articles related to the Sun}}
#{{afd star|Sail-by salute}}, aka ] or ]


===US politics===
Articles I'm trying to write or edit:
#{{afd star|Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy}}, a ] from ]


===Biography===
]
*{{afd star|William Connolley}} - just about the most famous Wikipedian to edit under his own name
----
*{{afd star|Sun Myung Moon}} - Unification Church founder, passed away {{plural| {{years ago|2012|9|3}} |year}} ago
*{{afd star|Hak Ja Han}} - widow of {{afd star|Sun Myung Moon}}
*{{afd star|Morton Kaplan}} - professor, diplomat
*{{afd star|Frank Kaufmann}} - religious scholar
*{{afd star|William Opdyke}} - did first in-depth study of {{afd star|code refactoring}} as a software engineering technique
*{{afd star|Edward Wegman}} - statistician
*{{afd star|Hyung Jin Moon}} - youngest son of {{afd star|Sun Myung Moon}}, and his appointed successor
*{{afd star|Frederick Sontag}} - was professor, author of ''{{afd star|Sun Myung Moon and the Unification Church}}''
*{{afd star|J.C.C. McKinsey}} - mathematician
*{{afd star|Benny Peiser}} - claimed that leading scientific journals were censoring {{afd star|debate on global warming}}
*{{afd star|Joseph J. Jacobs}} - one of the engineers responsible for creating {{afd star|DDT}}, one of the most well-known synthetic insecticides


===Unificationism===
I try to remove "bias" from Misplaced Pages articles on controversies dear to me, but I recognize that what I call "bias" may merely be ideas I misunderstand. I may in some cases also fail to distinguish between personal belief and documented fact, whether through wishful thinking or sheer sloppiness. Feel free to set me straight at any time. When I feel I've absorbed the lesson, I'll add it to my ] page.
*{{afd star|News World Communications}}
*{{afd star|Little Angels Children's Folk Ballet of Korea}}
*{{afd star|CAUSA International}}


===Books===
<i>I respond to praise, reason, and pizza -- not necessarily in that order!!</i>
*''{{afd star|Recovery from Cults}}''
*''{{afd star|100 People Who Are Screwing Up America}}''
*''{{afd star|Inventing the Flat Earth}}'' - debunking the notion that medieval Christians believed the earth was flat
*''{{afd star|The Day I Met God}}''
*''{{afd star|Inquisition: The Persecution and Prosecution of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon}}''


====Literature====
----
*''{{afd star|I Like Pumpkins}}''
Hi Ed, I just wanted to say welcome to Misplaced Pages, and tell you not to be discouraged by criticism of your contributions; its par for the course around here. You don't seem to be taking it personally though, and that will take you far around here. :) --]
*''{{afd star|The Loudness of Sam}}''
----
Hi Ed,
If you are going to make "Race and Intelligence" a separate article, couldn't you provide a link in the "race" article to that new one? I just skimmed over it and didn't see it -- if it is there and I missed it, I apologize. I didn't put it in myself because I think it should come sooner than the list of links at the end, but I am not sure where would be most appropriate. Can you remember where the "race and intelligence" section used to be, write a sentence calling attention to the debate (it is a big part of race, however you look at it -- scientifically, racistly, whatever), and providing the link? SR


====Fictional characters====
]
*{{afd star|Trumpkin}}


===Movies===
*{{afd star|Sudie and Simpson}}
*{{afd star|Cadillac Man}}
*{{afd star|Not Quite Human (film)}}
*{{afd star|I'll Be There (2003 film)}}


===Laws and rules===
----
*{{afd star|Department of Defense Directive 2310}} - how America treats "{{afd star|unlawful combatant}}s"
Ed, I agree that more specificity in the Sexual ducation article would be a good thing. But otherwise I think you are missing my (and perhaps others') point:


===Ideas and concepts===
1) it is wrong for you or anyone to assume that because someone rejects ''your'' version of morality, that they reject ''morality.'' Many people do what they do because they believe it to be right; if what they do is different from what you do, it doesn't mean that they do what they believe to be wrong, it means that you and they disagree over what is right.
*{{afd star|Double standard}}
*{{afd star|Forced conversion}}
*{{afd star|Gender norming}}
*{{afd star|Heteroflexible}}
*{{afd star|The rich get richer and the poor get poorer}}
*{{afd star|Tax cut}}
*{{afd star|Wickedness}}
*{{afd star|Health scare}}
*{{afd star|Independent review}} - Redirects to ]
*{{afd star|Effort optimism}} - "it's worth it"
*{{afd star|Threshold model}} - in toxicology, a drug may have zero effect for a dose below a critical or threshold value; compare {{afd star|Linear no-threshold model}}
*{{afd star|Stateless communism}}, also known as pure communism
*{{afd star|Role of women in religion}}
*{{afd star|Women in Islam}}
*{{afd star|UTC offset}} - see {{afd star|Time zone}}s
*{{afd star|Censorship in the Soviet Union}}
*{{afd star|Theological determinism}}
*{{afd star|Outline of the creation–evolution controversy}}
*{{afd star|Nomenklatura}} - privileged class in the USSR


===Computers===
2) here is what I would beg you to do: be consistent in your use of the word "morality." In many of your contributions you start off qualifying the word morality ("traditional morality" or "conservative morality." But as soon as you begin writing about the people you disagree with, the qualifying term drops out; thus, you write sentences like "They regard morality as confining and restricitive" (in the sexual morality article). Do you not see what your inconsistencey implies? Why do you not write "They regard traditional morality as confining...?" What you do write implies that these people are simply immoral, and not that they have a different moral standard than you. This is the lack of NPOV. My advice to you is to go over your previous contributions, and wherever you use the word "morality" you qualify it, somehow, so that it is clear that you are not suggesting that some people are moral and others immoral, but rather that people are arguing over what the moral thing to do is. SR
*{{afd star|Tab order}}
*{{afd star|Generics in Java}}
*{{afd star|Adjustment handle}}s
*{{afd star|Label (control)|Label}}


==Proposed deletions==
SR, you're spilling a lot of ink (or darkening a lot of phosphor) to no avail. If my articles need editing, just edit them. Anyone would get the impression you don't believe in absolute values. I won't compromise with the destroyers of morality and goodness -- not one little bit. That said, if the wikipedia editorial policy requires a qualifier, please just stick it in. And if there is information missing about other points of view that you think readers will want to see, please add it. -- Ed


===Survival of the fittest===
Sorry Ed, but to participate in Misplaced Pages you must compromise with others, regardless of your estimation of their morality. I too stand utterly opposed to the destroyers of morality and goodness, and yet I am trying to engage in a constructive dialogue with you, so you see, I am capable of minimal compromises.
*{{afd result|Wickedness|delete (December 2007)}} - recreated October 2011
*{{afd result|Booky's Crush|withdrawn}}
*{{afd result|Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)|keep}}
*{{afd result|Unit cohesion|speedy keep}}
*{{afd result|Blacklisted by History|keep}}
*{{afd result|Flemming Rule|keep}}
*{{afd result|Heteroflexible|merge and redirect|keep}}
*{{afd result|Shoshana Grossbard-Shechtman|keep}}
*{{afd result|Schleifer|keep}} => ]


===Evolved===
NPOV may be the outcome of a constant process of negotiation and modification of articles. But I take it as a given that people should come to Misplaced Pages in good faith and not make contributions that are blatantly NPOV. Otherwise, as JHK has observed, they are wasting people's time and undermining the value of the project. Do you come to Misplaced Pages in good faith? That is what I assumed when I tried to offer you some simple and constructive advice. I promise I will not spill any more ink over this -- if I haven't made myself clear by now, I don't know that I ever will. Perhaps you think you have been clear, but your stated committment to NPOV and Misplaced Pages contradicts the language of your own contributions. Frankly, you sound a bit confused. That's natural, because evil's best weapon is confusion. I just wanted to give you a bit of guidance; that's what I am here for. ;) SR
*] merged into ]
*{{afd result|Mel Gibson DUI incident|no consensus|keep}} merged into ]
*] merged into ]
*{{afd result|Heterosexual couple|redirect}} => ]
*'']'' merged to ]
*{{afd result|Edge motion|redirect}} - see ]
*{{afd result|As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen|keep|keep}} => ]
*{{afd result|Democratically elected|delete}} - see ]


===Endangered species===
:Thanks for the humor :-) I think I've shown my good faith by not re-re-re-reverting ] after you re-re-reverted it.
*]
:If there's anything specific you want changed, please just change it. I may be a slow learner, but I learn best from example: edit my contributions into an acceptable form, and I will do my best to adhere to that form in the future. --Ed


===Extinct species===
----
*{{afd result|Free Teens|delete}} - not a notable organization
Ed, I was impressed with your ability to compromise in various articles (specifically in the case of ]. However, I have one suggestion. If you want to start an article, ask yourself if you are doing it to present a ''moral viewpoint'' or to provide a NPOV. If you are doing it to point out your version of morality/immorality, then it isn't in the spirit of the Misplaced Pages. It is '''not''' fair to say, "Well, if people think it's not NPOV, they can merely add to it." People who might be qualified to edit the article might not ever notice it. Contributors should attempt to be NPOV from the start. If you're doing it to point out an opposing viewpoint in a factual manner, on a topic that needs it, then go ahead. The only reason I point this out is your Summary field in a couple of your recent topics seems to indicate that you're writing the articles because you want to present a moral viewpoint, not because you want to present a NPOV (''link to a site promoting immorality in teens''; ''teens can make wise decisions??''). My two cents. --]
*{{afd result|Man out of the house (welfare rule)|delete}} - see ]


==Verse==
:I think I've been pretty open about my intentions from the start. There is nothing "subtle" about my approach, Dr. Kemp's opinion notwithstanding.
:I want to ensure that good and true points of view are included in the Misplaced Pages. It's as simple as that.
:Now, I realize that Larry and Jimbo have an ] policy, and I applaud that. It's actually quite necessary, lest he who speaks loudest and longest win each debate. It's rather daring of them to permit such near-anarchy.
:It's true that I sometimes (often?) forget to qualify my contributions. I'm a terrible writer, I admit it. Yet it's rare for anything I've contributed to be really need to be deleted from an article; it just needs proper wording.
:Perhaps it's inherently hard for authors to be their own editors. Other wikipedians have asked me for advice on how to attain NPOV, and I've been thanked repeatedly for finding NPOV solutions to apparently intractable raging feuds. (Remember ]?) I ask you all to return the favor, as needed. -- ]


===Riding Happy Homeward===
:I agree with Rgamble on the general principle - but others are ''far'' worse at this than Ed. But we all need to be reminded once in a while that we must rise above our personal feelings on a subject and present it fairly. That is not to say the we should include every idiosyncratic line of reasoning - all it means is that we must include ''good arguments'' on the most prevalent viewpoints on an issue. For example, it would be ridculous to include anything more than a single sentence on flat-earthers on an article about the earth. --]~
:Ya need to wake up and smell the fresh air
:and hear the seagulls calling
::and the surf rushing to the shore;
:Feel the sand beneath your toes and more.


:Ever questing for that perfect balance
*To clarify, I do not mean to say that I think Ed is a terrible writer, nor do I believe he is not a good contributor to the Misplaced Pages. I merely wanted to point out that if he is worried himself about not always putting forth a NPOV (and he does seem to state this in previous comments) that he should merely ask himself (as I do also when I write an article) whether it's to provide factual information or another viewpoint about something, or whether it's to promote or sway others to a moral viewpoint. Subtle distinction but I think if a Summary indicates strongly that the writer feels the item being discussed is immoral, then it's not being written strictly to provide a NPOV. Just a suggestion, and one I follow myself. --]
::between wave and board
:Swimming out eager for a thrill
::and riding happy homeward.


===Consider the source===
---
Ed -- FYI, subpages no longer exist. Slashes don't mean anything special. You're actually just creating new user pages within the User: namespace, i.e., there are now users named Ed Poor/unkempt and Ed Poor/Dr Kemp -- with their own associated pages in the User talk: namespace.


:There once came a man with a view
----
:Which aroused such a hullaballoo
:That all of us said,
:"It should only be read,
:If attributed clearly to you!"


==Factoids==
Ed, the ] article is looking pretty good. I think separating advocacy (of all sorts) was a smart move, and is a good way to proceed with similar topics. -]

Questioning authority (]):
* It is noteworthy that liberals, one of whose mottos is "question authority," so rarely question the authority of the ]. Now, of course, conservatives, too, often believe mainstream media. But conservatives have other sources of news that enable them to achieve the liberal ideal of questioning authority. Whereas few liberals ever read non-liberal sources of information or listen to conservative talk radio, the great majority of conservatives are regularly exposed to liberal news, liberal editorials and liberal films, and they have also received many years of liberal education.

Global warming and US politics;
* While Republicans' belief in human-induced global warming has declined 10 percentage points from 2003 to 2008 (from 52% to 42%), Democrats' belief has been steady (possibly even rising slightly, though the increase from 68% to 73% is not statistically significant). The result is a substantial 31-point gap between adherents of the two major parties.

Can homosexuals change?
* Press releases from both ] and ] sought to undermine ]'s credibility by connecting him polticially to right-wing groups that had backed the ].
]
* Perhaps the most widely recognized failing of peer review is its inability to ensure the identification of high-quality work. The list of important scientific papers that were initially rejected by peer-reviewed journals goes back at least as far as the editor of ''Philosophical Transaction's'' 1796 rejection of ]'s report of the first ] against ].

] and ]:
* Because of women's reduced physical capabilities, readiness standards are called into question because standards have been lowered to accommodate women and equalize opportunity (Norman, 1997).
]:
* “Cohesion is the relationship that develops in a unit or group where (1) members share common values and experiences; (2) individuals in the group conform to group norms and behavior in order to ensure group survival and goals; (3) members lose their personal identity in favor of a group identity; (4) members focus on group activities and goals; (5) unit members become totally dependent on each other for the completion of their mission or survival; and (6) group members must meet all standards of performance and behavior in order not to threaten group survival.”
] on gender differences:
* As Eleanor Maccoby and Carol Jacklin observe in The Psychology of Sex of Differences, man's greater aggressiveness "is one of the best established, and most pervasive of all psychological sex differences."
The ]:
* ... the plebe system. It was harsh and cruel. It was designed to produce a man who would be able to be an effective leader in combat, to endure prisoner-of-war camps, to fight this country's wars with skill and tenacity. And it is all but gone.
]:
* The worst crimes of our century have been committed by crusades to eradicate injustice, stamp out politically incorrect attitudes, and reconstruct ].<ref> http://www.bible-researcher.com/women/horowitz1.html The Feminist Assault on the Military - National Review, October 5, 1992</ref>

Authority of the ]:
* ] of ]: "the IPCC report, which is still widely touted as the most authoritative single document on global warming."<ref> </ref>

] on ] and the ]:
* ... the scientific method transcends the flaws of individual scientists.<ref> - ]</ref>
* Science is the only way we have of separating the truth from ideology, or fraud, or mere foolishness.<ref> - ]</ref>
]:
#]: The world still awaits a proper inquiry into ]: one that is not stacked with global warming advocates, and one that is prepared to cross-examine evidence, interview critics as well as supporters of the ] and other IPCC players, and follow the evidence where it leads. - ], Ph.D
#] wrote, "The e-mails detail organized efforts to subvert and violate transparency laws ... in order to keep the public misinformed about the state of ]"<ref> </ref>
#] wrote:
#*Another scientist whose name had been abused in the e-mails, ], is quoted in another piece as saying of the e-mail writers that they "violated a fundamental principle of science" in trying to keep collected information from getting out, and that they "play science as a power game."<ref> </ref>

]:
* The science that is typically written up in history books is the science of great discoveries and great theories. But there is an equally important part of science that is not glamorous; the science of the skeptic. An important part of science is the requirement that new discoveries be able to be replicated by other researchers before they are accepted. This helps prevent false theories from being widely accepted. This requirement for replication and the refusal to accept a new discovery until it is possible to replicate it can easily be interpreted by naive commentators as "reactionary".<ref> This is self-published, so I guess we can't use it </ref>
]:
* ... many liberals’ charges of racism aren’t only false — they’re lies intended to intimidate us<ref> - Washington Examiner</ref>

] in China:
* The one child law means musicians have no siblings and are spoiled by their parents.<ref> , bass player (band leader of ]?)</ref>
]:
* ] "... too, emphasized a common culture but one that incorporated the contributions of all racial and ethnic groups so that they can believe in their full membership in America’s past, present, and future. She envisioned elimination of allegiance to any specific racial and/or ethnic group, with emphasis instead on our common humanity, our shared national identity, and our individual accomplishments.<ref></ref>
* ] seek elimination of cultural differences through loss of one’s distinctive traits that are replaced by the language, values, and other attributes of ].<ref name="vernonjohns1996"> (MacInnes 1996:57) </ref>
Race, and also government aid programs to reduce poverty:
* ] published a book in 1968 that made a simple and well-documented case that the problems played out in ghetto neighborhoods were a consequence of concentrated lower-class populations. Race was not the critical issue, he said. The black poor, Banfield suggested, were no different from other (white) lower-class Americans: they had no fondness for work, no strong family ties, an easy acceptance of criminal behavior, no brief for schooling, and no future perspective. Banfield argued that even well-pruned government programs could not undo the harm caused by class differences. For this sin, Banfield was effectively banished from one campus after another, his books vandalized, his lectures shouted down, and his sponsors threatened.<ref name="vernonjohns1996"/>

]:
* In 1915, Horace Kallen used the metaphor of a symphony orchestra to portray the strength through diversity of U.S. society. Just as different groups of instruments each play their separate parts of the musical score but together produce beautiful music of blends and contrasts, so, too, he said, do the various populations within pluralist America<ref>. Parillo</ref>

]:
*] wrote, "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."<ref>{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref>

]:
*"Colin Patterson (1933-1998) was the Senior Principal Scientific Officer in the Paleontology Department of British Museum of Natural History in London, from 1962-1993."<ref></ref>
*"Colin Patterson was employed in the palaeontology Department of The Natural History Museum in London from 1962 until 1993. He held an individual merit appointment beginning in 1974. Although retired at the age of sixty, he continued to work daily in the Museum until his sudden death in 1998."<ref> back cover of Evolution, second edition - Cornell University Press</ref>

]: "Pseudoscience, which involves passionate belief with no evidence, is often the result of convictions based on religion or politics."<ref> - American Scientist </ref>

]:
*"scientists, many of whom have impressive credentials, who craft arguments deliberately intended to deceive or confuse."<ref> , Page 171</ref>
]s:
*The most important discovery of modern medicine is not ]s or ]s, it is the ], by means of which we know what works and what doesn't.<ref></ref>

===Relativity===

Relativity and relativism:
* '... the physical anomalies that led to ] can be explained without it. For example, the famous equation "E = mc2" was derived using relativity theory. But later ] re-derived it, this time without relativity.'<ref> - ] - '']''</ref>

*]s do slow down when they move through the ]. But the slowing of clocks and the ] are very different things. GPS has "relativistic" corrections to keep its clocks synchronized. But those corrections depart significantly from Einstein's theory. They refer clock motion not to the observer but to an ], centered on the Earth.<ref name=tbethell2> - ] - '']''</ref>

*] and ] arose at about the same time, and the ]s surely bolstered the cultural applications. Now there is ] about both.<ref name=tbethell2 />

GPS:
"... because the satellites are constantly moving relative to observers on the Earth, effects predicted by the Special and General theories of Relativity must be taken into account to achieve the desired 20-30 nanosecond accuracy."<ref name=pogge-gps></ref>

*"Special Relativity predicts that the on-board atomic clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by about 7 microseconds per day ..."<ref name=pogge-gps />
*"A calculation using General Relativity predicts that the clocks in each GPS satellite should get ahead of ground-based clocks by 45 microseconds per day."<ref name=pogge-gps />

*In detail: "The engineers who designed the GPS system included these relativistic effects when they designed and deployed the system. For example, to counteract the General Relativistic effect once on orbit, they slowed down the ticking frequency of the atomic clocks before they were launched so that once they were in their proper orbit stations their clocks would appear to tick at the correct rate as compared to the reference atomic clocks at the GPS ground stations. Further, each GPS receiver has built into it a microcomputer that (among other things) performs the necessary relativistic calculations when determining the user's location."<ref name=pogge-gps />

===Other===
] ():
*] says that his best ideas usually come to him in a flash. "These innovations are not the result of rational thought; it's an intuitive idea."

]: The most basic note is called the ''whole note'' because ... it lasts a whole measure .<ref> By Michael Miller</ref>

"... the oppressed ] on the ] ] identified with the ] in ]."<ref> Page 114 of ''Songs America Sings'' by Melvin Stecher, Norman Horowitz and Claire Gordon</ref>

"... ] ]s in the ] identified with ] and the ] enslaved in ]..."<ref> Page 116 of ''Songs America Sings'' by Melvin Stecher, Norman Horowitz and Claire Gordon</ref>

] aims at returning society to an idealized primitive ].<ref></ref>

]s "suffer from an incredible blackout of knowledge about the outside world. The control on the population exceeds anything the world has seen to date." <ref></ref>

==References==
<references />





]
]

Latest revision as of 12:45, 7 December 2024

Userboxes
This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 23 years, 1 month and 6 days.
This user has been editing Misplaced Pages for more than ten years.
This user is old enough to remember what a typewriter is.
This editor is a
Master Editor III
and is entitled to display this
Bufonite Editor Star.

I was one of the first 200 people to contribute regularly to Misplaced Pages, and I've served as a Mediator, an Admin, and a Bureaucrat.

The {{birth date and age}} template I created is used on over 700,000 Misplaced Pages pages, and was the major motivation for parser extensions (to reduce load on the server caused by the first version).

I find Misplaced Pages a useful resource, but it's not very well-written and is often inaccurate. Almost every time I dip into its pages, I find something that urgently needs fixing, and a few topics have unresolvable bias.

Customs and practices of Misplaced Pages

Shortcuts:

Reminders

  • provide 3 examples of tax cuts which SOME PEOPLE said resulted in (a) more gov't revenue or (b) an economic boom
    But be sure to distinguish between tax-rate cuts (like 35% down to 25%) and "tax cuts" (i.e., reducing gov't revenue)
  • Talk:solar variation - only sunlight, and not sunspots or solar wind?
    So in the climate section of this page, heaven help me for saying this, we should note that variations in the solar magnetic field & solar wind may cause an impact to cosmic rays hitting the earth. However, I stand by my assertion that this page should be mostly about solar variation (the actual physical changes to the sun) and that the terrestrial climate topic and climate change and other impacts of the sun on the earth should be handled in their respective pages with only summaries here.
  • Talk:Sunlight#Reorganize - article split?
  • Talk:Atonement in Christianity‎ - Reorganize if no objection

Some articles I created

Most of these have been extensively modified by others, per WP:TEAMWORK, which - duh! - is the main point of a wiki.

Star* means someone tried to get the article deleted. Dagger means they tried twice!

Recent

  1. From Bacteria to Bach and Back
  2. War on Women, political slogan (deleted, then revived)
  3. Contraceptive mandate (United States)
  4. Illegal guns => /Illegal guns
  5. Sexism in academia
  6. Women in combat, spun off from Women in the military
  7. Combat Exclusion Policy
  8. Seaman's Manslaughter Statute
  9. Abandonment of ship
  10. Misplaced Pages:Superlatives
  11. {{Korean age}}
  12. {{Before date}}
  13. Mosques near the World Trade Center
  14. List of articles related to the Sun
  15. Sail-by salute, aka Tourist navigation or Near-shore salute

US politics

  1. Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy, a WP:SPLIT from Sandra Fluke

Biography

Unificationism

Books

Literature

Fictional characters

Movies

Laws and rules

Ideas and concepts

Computers

Proposed deletions

Survival of the fittest

Evolved

Endangered species

Extinct species

Verse

Riding Happy Homeward

Ya need to wake up and smell the fresh air
and hear the seagulls calling
and the surf rushing to the shore;
Feel the sand beneath your toes and more.
Ever questing for that perfect balance
between wave and board
Swimming out eager for a thrill
and riding happy homeward.

Consider the source

There once came a man with a view
Which aroused such a hullaballoo
That all of us said,
"It should only be read,
If attributed clearly to you!"

Factoids

Questioning authority (Dennis Prager):

  • It is noteworthy that liberals, one of whose mottos is "question authority," so rarely question the authority of the mainstream media. Now, of course, conservatives, too, often believe mainstream media. But conservatives have other sources of news that enable them to achieve the liberal ideal of questioning authority. Whereas few liberals ever read non-liberal sources of information or listen to conservative talk radio, the great majority of conservatives are regularly exposed to liberal news, liberal editorials and liberal films, and they have also received many years of liberal education. Dennis Prager

Global warming and US politics;

  • While Republicans' belief in human-induced global warming has declined 10 percentage points from 2003 to 2008 (from 52% to 42%), Democrats' belief has been steady (possibly even rising slightly, though the increase from 68% to 73% is not statistically significant). The result is a substantial 31-point gap between adherents of the two major parties.

Can homosexuals change?

Peer review

  • Perhaps the most widely recognized failing of peer review is its inability to ensure the identification of high-quality work. The list of important scientific papers that were initially rejected by peer-reviewed journals goes back at least as far as the editor of Philosophical Transaction's 1796 rejection of Edward Jenner's report of the first vaccination against smallpox.

Equal opportunity and Gender norming:

  • Because of women's reduced physical capabilities, readiness standards are called into question because standards have been lowered to accommodate women and equalize opportunity (Norman, 1997).

Unit cohesion:

  • “Cohesion is the relationship that develops in a unit or group where (1) members share common values and experiences; (2) individuals in the group conform to group norms and behavior in order to ensure group survival and goals; (3) members lose their personal identity in favor of a group identity; (4) members focus on group activities and goals; (5) unit members become totally dependent on each other for the completion of their mission or survival; and (6) group members must meet all standards of performance and behavior in order not to threaten group survival.”

James Webb on gender differences:

  • As Eleanor Maccoby and Carol Jacklin observe in The Psychology of Sex of Differences, man's greater aggressiveness "is one of the best established, and most pervasive of all psychological sex differences."

The plebe system:

  • ... the plebe system. It was harsh and cruel. It was designed to produce a man who would be able to be an effective leader in combat, to endure prisoner-of-war camps, to fight this country's wars with skill and tenacity. And it is all but gone.

David Horowitz:

  • The worst crimes of our century have been committed by crusades to eradicate injustice, stamp out politically incorrect attitudes, and reconstruct human nature.

Authority of the IPCC:

Robert L. Park on science and the scientific method:

  • ... the scientific method transcends the flaws of individual scientists.
  • Science is the only way we have of separating the truth from ideology, or fraud, or mere foolishness.

Climategate:

  1. Ross McKitrick: The world still awaits a proper inquiry into climategate: one that is not stacked with global warming advocates, and one that is prepared to cross-examine evidence, interview critics as well as supporters of the CRU and other IPCC players, and follow the evidence where it leads. Understanding the Climategate Inquiries - Ross McKitrick, Ph.D
  2. Chris Horner wrote, "The e-mails detail organized efforts to subvert and violate transparency laws ... in order to keep the public misinformed about the state of climate science"
  3. Jay Ambrose wrote:
    • Another scientist whose name had been abused in the e-mails, Hans von Storch, is quoted in another piece as saying of the e-mail writers that they "violated a fundamental principle of science" in trying to keep collected information from getting out, and that they "play science as a power game."

Scientific skepticism:

  • The science that is typically written up in history books is the science of great discoveries and great theories. But there is an equally important part of science that is not glamorous; the science of the skeptic. An important part of science is the requirement that new discoveries be able to be replicated by other researchers before they are accepted. This helps prevent false theories from being widely accepted. This requirement for replication and the refusal to accept a new discovery until it is possible to replicate it can easily be interpreted by naive commentators as "reactionary".

Racism:

  • ... many liberals’ charges of racism aren’t only false — they’re lies intended to intimidate us

One child law in China:

  • The one child law means musicians have no siblings and are spoiled by their parents.

Cultural assimilation:

  • Diane Ravitch "... too, emphasized a common culture but one that incorporated the contributions of all racial and ethnic groups so that they can believe in their full membership in America’s past, present, and future. She envisioned elimination of allegiance to any specific racial and/or ethnic group, with emphasis instead on our common humanity, our shared national identity, and our individual accomplishments.
  • Assimilationists seek elimination of cultural differences through loss of one’s distinctive traits that are replaced by the language, values, and other attributes of mainstream Americans.

Race, and also government aid programs to reduce poverty:

  • Edward C. Banfield published a book in 1968 that made a simple and well-documented case that the problems played out in ghetto neighborhoods were a consequence of concentrated lower-class populations. Race was not the critical issue, he said. The black poor, Banfield suggested, were no different from other (white) lower-class Americans: they had no fondness for work, no strong family ties, an easy acceptance of criminal behavior, no brief for schooling, and no future perspective. Banfield argued that even well-pruned government programs could not undo the harm caused by class differences. For this sin, Banfield was effectively banished from one campus after another, his books vandalized, his lectures shouted down, and his sponsors threatened.

Multiculturalism:

  • In 1915, Horace Kallen used the metaphor of a symphony orchestra to portray the strength through diversity of U.S. society. Just as different groups of instruments each play their separate parts of the musical score but together produce beautiful music of blends and contrasts, so, too, he said, do the various populations within pluralist America

Prejudice:

  • William James wrote, "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."

Evolution:

  • "Colin Patterson (1933-1998) was the Senior Principal Scientific Officer in the Paleontology Department of British Museum of Natural History in London, from 1962-1993."
  • "Colin Patterson was employed in the palaeontology Department of The Natural History Museum in London from 1962 until 1993. He held an individual merit appointment beginning in 1974. Although retired at the age of sixty, he continued to work daily in the Museum until his sudden death in 1998."

Pseudoscience: "Pseudoscience, which involves passionate belief with no evidence, is often the result of convictions based on religion or politics."

Voodoo Science:

  • "scientists, many of whom have impressive credentials, who craft arguments deliberately intended to deceive or confuse."

Scientific claims:

Relativity

Relativity and relativism:

  • '... the physical anomalies that led to relativity can be explained without it. For example, the famous equation "E = mc2" was derived using relativity theory. But later Einstein re-derived it, this time without relativity.'
  • Atomic clocks do slow down when they move through the gravitational field. But the slowing of clocks and the slowing of time are very different things. GPS has "relativistic" corrections to keep its clocks synchronized. But those corrections depart significantly from Einstein's theory. They refer clock motion not to the observer but to an absolute reference frame, centered on the Earth.

GPS: "... because the satellites are constantly moving relative to observers on the Earth, effects predicted by the Special and General theories of Relativity must be taken into account to achieve the desired 20-30 nanosecond accuracy."

  • "Special Relativity predicts that the on-board atomic clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by about 7 microseconds per day ..."
  • "A calculation using General Relativity predicts that the clocks in each GPS satellite should get ahead of ground-based clocks by 45 microseconds per day."
  • In detail: "The engineers who designed the GPS system included these relativistic effects when they designed and deployed the system. For example, to counteract the General Relativistic effect once on orbit, they slowed down the ticking frequency of the atomic clocks before they were launched so that once they were in their proper orbit stations their clocks would appear to tick at the correct rate as compared to the reference atomic clocks at the GPS ground stations. Further, each GPS receiver has built into it a microcomputer that (among other things) performs the necessary relativistic calculations when determining the user's location."

Other

Intuition (Amar Bose):

  • Bose says that his best ideas usually come to him in a flash. "These innovations are not the result of rational thought; it's an intuitive idea." Popular Science Dec 2004

Whole note: The most basic note is called the whole note because ... it lasts a whole measure .

"... the oppressed blacks on the Southern plantations identified with the Israelites in Egypt."

"... Black slaves in the South identified with Moses and the Israelites enslaved in Egypt..."

Feminism aims at returning society to an idealized primitive matriarchy.

North Koreans "suffer from an incredible blackout of knowledge about the outside world. The control on the population exceeds anything the world has seen to date."

References

  1. http://www.bible-researcher.com/women/horowitz1.html The Feminist Assault on the Military - National Review, October 5, 1992
  2. The Telegraph, 23 April 2011
  3. The Cosmic Zoom - Robert L. Park
  4. The Cosmic Zoom - Robert L. Park
  5. Washington Examiner, 11/30/09
  6. Washington Examiner, 12/02/09
  7. Scientus This is self-published, so I guess we can't use it
  8. Ackerman, Yglesias, and Krugman: A particularly Machiavellian moment for the Left - Washington Examiner
  9. Brian Hardgroove, bass player (band leader of Public Enemy (group)?)
  10. Is Multiculturalism a threat?
  11. ^ (MacInnes 1996:57) White Racism
  12. . Is Multiculturalism a Threat? Parillo
  13. Quotes -- Courtesy of The Freeman Institute
  14. Amazon.com review
  15. publisher's blurb back cover of Evolution, second edition - Cornell University Press
  16. Exposing Fools Gladly - American Scientist
  17. Voodoo Science, Page 171
  18. Bogus Science 4 - Evidence is anecdotal
  19. BETHELL: Relativity and relativism - Tom Bethell - Washington Times
  20. ^ BETHELL: Relativity and relativism - Tom Bethell - Washington Times
  21. ^ GPS and relativity
  22. The Complete Idiot's Guide to Music Theory, 2nd Edition By Michael Miller
  23. Page 114 of Songs America Sings by Melvin Stecher, Norman Horowitz and Claire Gordon
  24. Page 116 of Songs America Sings by Melvin Stecher, Norman Horowitz and Claire Gordon
  25. The Victorian Cult of the Child
  26. The Significato Journal | North Korea, The Prison Nation
Categories: