| Revision as of 00:07, 13 January 2010 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,384 edits →request help from a clerk: Not a clerk matter. Maybe try ANI?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:44, 1 January 2025 edit undoHouseBlaster (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators59,319 edits →WP:A/C alignment: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| = Noticeboard = | = Noticeboard = | ||
| {{/Header}} | {{/Header}} | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| | age=90 | |||
| | archiveprefix=Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/archive | |||
| | numberstart=10 | |||
| | maxarchsize=150000 | |||
| | header={{Archive}} | |||
| | minkeepthreads=2 | |||
| | minarchthreads=1 | |||
| | format= %%i | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archive box|search =yes| | |||
| * ] (to 26 January 2006) | |||
| * ] (to 28 January 2006) | |||
| * ] (archive of a discussion started on January 29, 2006 at the ]) | |||
| * ] (to 28 January 2006) | |||
| * ] (February 2006→December 2008, clerks' coordination board) | |||
| * ] (December 2008→March 2010, clerks' coordination board) | |||
| * ] (January 2006→May 2009) | |||
| * ] (May 2009→June 2012, noticeboard merged) | |||
| * ] (June 2012→September 2014) | |||
| * ] (September 2014→September 2015) | |||
| * ] (3 October→4 November 2015) | |||
| * ] (October 2015→March 2021) | |||
| * ] (April 2021→present) | |||
| {{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/archive 12|* ] (fill in dates please)|}} | |||
| }} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| <div style="border-top: 1px solid #aaa; font-style: italic; padding-left: 1.6em"> | |||
| ---- | |||
| '''Arbitrators, clerks and trainees:''' Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance. | |||
| :'''''Clerks and trainees''', please coordinate your actions through this section, so that we don't have multiple clerks working on the same cases at the same time. An IRC channel, , and a ], Clerks-l, are also available for private co-ordination and communication, although the mailing list is fairly low traffic.'' | |||
| ==Pending Requests== | |||
| ''All work relating to pending requests on ].'' | |||
| Someone should probably ask about the Tang Dynasty amendment request.. It has more than majority vote in passing for most of the items there. (I'm recused on that one.) - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 11:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Open Cases== | |||
| ''All work relating to Arbitration cases already opened'' | |||
| === Active/inactive arbitrators === | |||
| :''This list will be used to set the number of active Arbitrators and the case majority on cases as they open. As of 8 January, there are 15 active Arbitrators for all new cases, and the majority is therefore 8 for all '''new''' cases (that is, those accepted after the "as of" date). See ] for help. The master list is at ].'' | |||
| '''Active''' (as of 5 January 2010): | |||
| #Carcharoth | |||
| #Cool Hand Luke | |||
| #FayssalF | |||
| #Fritzpoll | |||
| #Hersfold | |||
| #Kirill Lokshin | |||
| #KnightLago | |||
| #Mailer diablo | |||
| #Risker | |||
| #Rlevse | |||
| #Roger Davies | |||
| #Shell Kinney | |||
| #SirFozzie | |||
| #Stephen Bain | |||
| #Steve Smith | |||
| #Vassyana | |||
| :::<sup>†</sup><small>Term formally ends 31 December 2009 but will remain on the committee until all cases in which he has participated close.</small> | |||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| == ARBPIA5 motion at ARCA == | |||
| Refers to ]. | |||
| For motion 5 (ARBPIA5) it states that there are 10 active arbs and since 1 has abstained, 5 is a majority. However, L235 (an inactive arb) has voted on it, so the majority needs to be altered to 6. | |||
| '''Away or inactive''': | |||
| #Coren | |||
| #Newyorkbrad | |||
| #Wizardman | |||
| === Arbitrator announcements === | |||
| :''Arbitrators, please note if you wish to declare yourself active or away/inactive, either generally or for specific cases. The clerks will update the relevant cases as needed. If you are returning, please indicate whether you wish to be: 1) Put back to active on all cases; 2) Left on inactive on all open cases, and only put to active on new cases; or 3) Left to set yourself to active on cases you wish (remember to update the majority on its /Proposed decision page).'' | |||
| *I will be going active on all new cases, and the Tothwolf case. Thanks! ] (]) 19:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *I will be active on cases going forward but not picking up the Tothwolf case. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *I will need to go inactive on the Tothwolf case, unfortunately. Please update the template, and I think you will need to update the majority. I will also be inactive on other requests unless I specifically post in them, until approximately January 16th. Thanks. ] (]) 16:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Long term projects == | |||
| * ''None, currently.'' | |||
| = Discussion = | |||
| {{archive box|search=yes| | |||
| * ] (to 26 January, 2006) | |||
| * ] (to 28 January, 2006) | |||
| * ] (archive of a discussion started on January 29, 2006 at the ]) | |||
| * ] (to 28 January, 2006) | |||
| * ] (to May 2009) | |||
| * ] (noticeboard merged→present)}} | |||
| == Images in case statements == | |||
| There is a growing tendency to add irrelevant images to statements. These are ] and serve only to reinforce the writer's POV. I've removed just now. Please remove any others as and when they appear. Thanks, ] <sup>]</sup> 07:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Piotrus == | |||
| I was perusing the arbcom case and noticed that the 1 year ban for piotrus ended up at 4 supports and 3 against, while 1 arb stated that they were abstaining. This means that there was one undeclared abstention (i.e. an arb didn't vote in any direction), meaning the motion passed (2 abstaining arbs means 4 is the magic number)? Or is a non response considered a vote against rather than abstaining? More a procedural question to further my own understanding than anything else. <span style="font-family: helvetica;"> --] ~ ] • </span> 19:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Not voting is the same as opposing since we tallying the number of supports to figure if a motion or proposal passes. An abstain vote must be actively noted by voting since it reduces the majority. ]] 20:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Superb :) Thank you very much! <span style="font-family: helvetica;"> --] ~ ] • </span> 22:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyediting of guide == | |||
| Clerks, I am trying to copyedit the guide to arbitration for clarity. ] asked that I place a notice here. The edits will concentrate on clarifying and simplifying the language; please let me know if I make inadvertent changes that you would consider a problem. Best, ] (]) 16:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == 2nd Jack Merridew motion == | |||
| I'm unsure if that affects the numbers for any of the other motions (or indeed any other cases) but it clearly does for this one. ] 20:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. There were two full copies of my last motion; one on the page and another on the talk page, and also duplicate copies of the prior motion in the intros to the new motion. I noticed that the motion had been moved per the discussion last month and went to tidy-up the link to it from my history page and I have cut the duplication for clarity. The only substantive change is a change of the word 'following' to 'above', as I made the second motion link to the original just above it instead of repeating it. I have linked to the copy of the votes and discussion on the talk page as was done for the prior motion and also added a link to the statements from my mentors and myself. It all seems much clearer to me this way. | |||
| :Marked as active on the one motion. ], we'll assume you're not active on the other 6 motions unless you indicate otherwise or vote on them. ] ] 20:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == ] alignment == | |||
| Cheers, ] 21:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The box at ] used to be on the left side of the page. There is a parameter used in {{tl|ArbComOpenTasks}} called {{para|acotalign|left}}, but that parameter seems to no longer do anything, and the box now floats way down bottom-right. I tried a few things to fix this but they didn't work. Complicating things, for whatever reason the box floats left in preview. Any ideas? <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(])</small> 06:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == request help from a clerk == | |||
| :], it looks fine on my screen? It appears that {{para|acotalign}} was removed ], so that parameter has been worthless for over a decade at this point. <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 02:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Tothwolf, who's involved in an arbcom case with me, has decided to mark himself as retired in his user page. As a final bout of incivility, he's written a ] post on his talk page which links to diff that includes a semi-attack on me. please see ]. I've tried to remove the wiki link to the attack, but he's come out of retirement to restore it. could someone remove the attack diff from his ]? the diff consists of uncivil language such as "Theserialcomma, you aren't fooling anyone here either." "due to your wikihounding, harassment, collusion, and gaming of the system." "considering that you've taken to harassing and wikihounding multiple editors (too many to name) and even administrators" and "heserialcomma, let me also be quite blunt with you: I'm not afraid of you or your bullying. Try as you did to find my identity and information about me to use to out, bully, and threaten me, you failed to find anything (although you certainly left quite a ] during your efforts)". i dont think he should be allowed to leave this soapbox, rambling nonsense personal attack against me as his 'farewell' to wikipedia message, since the arbcom results did not find anything he is claiming ] (]) 23:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::@]: What skin are you using? I'm using Vector-22. Checking now, it does align left in Vector. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(])</small> 03:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : This does not relate to the enforcement of guidelines for conduct on arbitration pages, so there is little a clerk could do for you. Might you have more luck at the ]? ] 00:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::], I am a Vector 2010 user; probably should've though to check the default skin! I don't see enough space to have it left-aligned while still keeping the other two sidebars. Thinking <del>out loud</del> <ins>in writing</ins>, do we need the dispute resolution sidebar there? It is not a current arbitration request. Thinking even more in print, I am wondering if WP:A/C can be BLAR'd to ], which has all of the information at WP:A/C and more. <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 03:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I find A/C a very helpful page to access ArbCom recent changes without having to load a whole noticeboard. Seemingly . Would there be some way to make ACOT's total width flexible? At the moment it looks like all the widths are hardcoded. Alternately, ] works. It's a little ugly with the DR template down there, but putting three sidebars together is gonna look a little ugly no matter what. Or as a third option, you could force all three boxen into a table. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(])</small> 03:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Well, it was an idea. Happy to keep it around if people find it useful :){{pb}}Forcing all three into a table looks even worse on my screen. It forces ACOT to be super narrow. I think your proposed edit (moving the least relevant item to drop below) is the least bad option which does not involve {{User:Tamzin/The diaeresis|re|i|nventing}} the wheel. If someone wants to work on making ACOT's width flexible, I think that would be awesome, but with ] I am reluctant to sign up for doing that myself. Happy to let you do the honors of reinstating your edit; also happy to do it myself. <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 03:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::@]: Idea just popped into my head the other night: Why not just redirect it to ]? <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(])</small> 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{done|]}} BOLDly; if anyone has objections revert (and I waive ] for this particular edit). <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 06:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Parameters to set widths on pages, or arbitrary floats, inhibit display at mobile resolution. Setting width is a no-go from that perspective. Setting a different kind of float is possible in TemplateStyles and if that's pursued should be pursued there. ] (]) 04:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:44, 1 January 2025
Noticeboard
Clerks' Noticeboard (WP:AC/CN) Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 10 January 2025 |
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
Private mattersThe clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-l
lists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
ARBPIA5 motion at ARCA
Refers to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Motion_5:_PIA5_Case.
For motion 5 (ARBPIA5) it states that there are 10 active arbs and since 1 has abstained, 5 is a majority. However, L235 (an inactive arb) has voted on it, so the majority needs to be altered to 6.
I'm unsure if that affects the numbers for any of the other motions (or indeed any other cases) but it clearly does for this one. Black Kite (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Marked as active on the one motion. L235, we'll assume you're not active on the other 6 motions unless you indicate otherwise or vote on them. SilverLocust 💬 20:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
WP:A/C alignment
The box at WP:A/C used to be on the left side of the page. There is a parameter used in {{ArbComOpenTasks}} called |acotalign=left, but that parameter seems to no longer do anything, and the box now floats way down bottom-right. I tried a few things to fix this but they didn't work. Complicating things, for whatever reason the box floats left in preview. Any ideas? -- Tamzin (they|xe) 06:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Tamzin, it looks fine on my screen? It appears that
|acotalign=was removed in 2012, so that parameter has been worthless for over a decade at this point. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)- @HouseBlaster: What skin are you using? I'm using Vector-22. Checking now, it does align left in Vector. -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 03:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tamzin, I am a Vector 2010 user; probably should've though to check the default skin! I don't see enough space to have it left-aligned while still keeping the other two sidebars. Thinking
out loudin writing, do we need the dispute resolution sidebar there? It is not a current arbitration request. Thinking even more in print, I am wondering if WP:A/C can be BLAR'd to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests, which has all of the information at WP:A/C and more. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)- I find A/C a very helpful page to access ArbCom recent changes without having to load a whole noticeboard. Seemingly many others do too. Would there be some way to make ACOT's total width flexible? At the moment it looks like all the widths are hardcoded. Alternately, this works. It's a little ugly with the DR template down there, but putting three sidebars together is gonna look a little ugly no matter what. Or as a third option, you could force all three boxen into a table. -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 03:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it was an idea. Happy to keep it around if people find it useful :)Forcing all three into a table looks even worse on my screen. It forces ACOT to be super narrow. I think your proposed edit (moving the least relevant item to drop below) is the least bad option which does not involve reïnventing the wheel. If someone wants to work on making ACOT's width flexible, I think that would be awesome, but with current stuff I am reluctant to sign up for doing that myself. Happy to let you do the honors of reinstating your edit; also happy to do it myself. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: Idea just popped into my head the other night: Why not just redirect it to Template:ArbComOpenTasks? -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Done BOLDly; if anyone has objections revert (and I waive the prohibition on reverting clerks in arbspace for this particular edit). HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: Idea just popped into my head the other night: Why not just redirect it to Template:ArbComOpenTasks? -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Parameters to set widths on pages, or arbitrary floats, inhibit display at mobile resolution. Setting width is a no-go from that perspective. Setting a different kind of float is possible in TemplateStyles and if that's pursued should be pursued there. Izno (talk) 04:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it was an idea. Happy to keep it around if people find it useful :)Forcing all three into a table looks even worse on my screen. It forces ACOT to be super narrow. I think your proposed edit (moving the least relevant item to drop below) is the least bad option which does not involve reïnventing the wheel. If someone wants to work on making ACOT's width flexible, I think that would be awesome, but with current stuff I am reluctant to sign up for doing that myself. Happy to let you do the honors of reinstating your edit; also happy to do it myself. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I find A/C a very helpful page to access ArbCom recent changes without having to load a whole noticeboard. Seemingly many others do too. Would there be some way to make ACOT's total width flexible? At the moment it looks like all the widths are hardcoded. Alternately, this works. It's a little ugly with the DR template down there, but putting three sidebars together is gonna look a little ugly no matter what. Or as a third option, you could force all three boxen into a table. -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 03:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tamzin, I am a Vector 2010 user; probably should've though to check the default skin! I don't see enough space to have it left-aligned while still keeping the other two sidebars. Thinking
- @HouseBlaster: What skin are you using? I'm using Vector-22. Checking now, it does align left in Vector. -- Tamzin (they|xe|🤷) 03:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)