| Revision as of 04:21, 16 January 2010 editSdiver68 (talk | contribs)99 edits →Miklasz← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:14, 16 June 2024 edit undoCutOffTies (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,033 editsm Reverted edit by JPxG (talk) to last version by ThryduulfTags: Rollback Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{Usertalkback|icon=attn|you=watched}} | {{Usertalkback|icon=attn|you=watched}} | ||
| {{Archive box|] (2008-Oct 2009)<br /> ] (Oct 2009-Feb 2010)<br /> ] (Feb 2010-July 2010)<br /> ] (July 2010-November 2010) <br /> ] (November 2010-July 2011) <br />] (July 2011-Feb 2014)<br />] (Feb 2014-August 2015)}} | |||
| {{Archive box|], ]}} | |||
| <!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| |algo = old(1h) | |algo = old(1h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Omarcheeseboro/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Omarcheeseboro/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} |
}} --> | ||
| == Oriole Park at Camden Yards article vandalism. == | |||
| Huge thanks for issuing warnings to Paul Baker7 and Saltin3s for blatant vandalism of this article. ] (]) 02:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Barnstar! == | |||
| Can you elaborate on what is original research on the ] talk page? Thanks --] (]) 08:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ==Simple Question== | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| Are you Anti-Whig or just anti-Ballot Access News? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Huge appreciation for your actions against blatant vandalism. ] (]) 02:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar--> | |||
| ] | |||
| ::Neither. --] (]) 16:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Obadiah album.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
| If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> | |||
| ==]?== | |||
| Is there a reason that you continue to change the ] site ] and ] sites? You say Mr. Annarumma's reads as an advertisement but it reads only facts and differes from no other political candidates bio. You decided that Muncie free press is not credible becuase of its looks? Take a look at the Drudge Report and say it appears any better. Your continued actions over the last couple of weeks have come across as a personal mission by you and are on the verge of Vandalism. You even at one point claimed that this persons official campaign site was not considered reliable. What is your personal attacks on these 3 sites I listed intended purpose? You asked for changes they were made and now you found another reason to alter them. Why?] (]) 23:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am simply following the ], ], and ] guidelines as laid out by the project. Why would a person's official campaign site automatically be considered reliable? I don't recall saying that, but I do know that in the next few hours I could say I'm running for office in some minor independent party, create a website and make up all this stuff about my credentials. Would that make it reliable? I'm not saying that's what these candidates did, but it drives home the points made in the ] guidelines better. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ::Your allegations of vandalism and personal attacks are laughable. Every edit I made is clearly backed by an established Misplaced Pages guideline. Perhaps you should read the ] of this project to understand better. --] (]) 23:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Running== | |||
| We would welcome you to renew your involvement with ]. Thanks. ] (]) 18:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| == legitimate and verifable contributions == | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| some of my contributions may be unpleasant but not "Negative and controversial" | |||
| my disclosures to the school authority and the Police are on record | |||
| the school's achievements need to be in the context of the adversity | |||
| we faced and this included sexual abuses by a few teachers. | |||
| sadly some boys suisided as young adults. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == LeRoy Rooker == | |||
| You are vandalizing the page on LeRoy Rooker by blanking valid criticisms. Rooker was a public servant/government employee for a very long time. His agency, the US Department of Education, Family Policy Compliance has a long history of failing to enforce the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Case numbers could be provided to support this fact but, as these pertain to confidential student records, they cannot be released. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Per the guideline on ]: | |||
| ::''Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.'' | |||
| ::You and another user, ] (unless they both are you, very difficult to assume good faith with a name like that) have only added criticism without a trace of a reference to back the material. I suggest you read about ], ] and ]. Thank you. --] (]) 14:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Gillian Welch == | |||
| The overhaul looks great. I'll keep an eye on the article and help with any GA review issues. ] (]) 14:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks! --] (]) 14:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Miklasz == | |||
| You edited my entry to Bernie Miklasz despite providing 3 links to the source of the controversy. 2 of those links were to articles written by Bernie himself. Not in violation of any wiki guideline. Please explain. | |||
Latest revision as of 06:14, 16 June 2024
| This is CutOffTies's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 |
|
 Archives |
|
Archive 1 (2008-Oct 2009) |
| Edit this box |
Oriole Park at Camden Yards article vandalism.
Huge thanks for issuing warnings to Paul Baker7 and Saltin3s for blatant vandalism of this article. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Huge appreciation for your actions against blatant vandalism. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC) |
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Obadiah album.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Obadiah album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Valley Girl Syndrome (VGS) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valley Girl Syndrome (VGS) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Valley Girl Syndrome (VGS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Thryduulf (talk) 16:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Category: