| Revision as of 08:34, 18 January 2010 editJames dalton bell (talk | contribs)67 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:14, 25 March 2024 edit undoDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits update header; yes, I'm still around. No, not for anything that could brew undue conflict. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<div style="text-align: center;">I'm "around" enough to help on minor bits of code I've written or other related matters, but that's it.</div> |
| ⚫ |
{{/Header}} |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{/Header|talk=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{User:Daedalus969/talkarchive}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{User:Daedalus969/talkarchive}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 64K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 64K |
|
|counter = 17 |
|
|counter = 22 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
| Line 13: |
Line 15: |
|
<!-- Please leave new messages at the bottom. Thanks! =) --> |
|
<!-- Please leave new messages at the bottom. Thanks! =) --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Nomination for deletion of ] == |
|
== Happy New Year == |
|
|
|
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
<div style="border:3px solid blue;background:#0095B6;font-family:verdana"> |
|
|
] Dear Daedalus969,<br />I just wanted to wish you and your family a HAPPY NEW YEAR. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.]]{{-}}</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Sysop? you aren't? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Here I've thought you were a sysop all this time. I would be willing to nominate you if nec, it might not help you but I think highly of your particaption here. ] (]) 01:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:Have me supporting you would certainly help. Afeterall, I contributed to your block. And haveing a person who would normally vote oppose do the opposite is always a good thing in RFA's.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::I still don't think I'm ready.. it's too soon since my last conflict.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::But your last conflict would be void if the two people that you had a conflict with were supporting you! That would make people realize that your block was a mistake. If you do go up for an RFA, i'll be there to co-nom it. (Unless you don;t want me to)--] <sup>]</sup> 01:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::::What you do is up to you, but I still don't think that that would really help matters. I was still uncivil, and your behavior does not excuse mine.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Alrigh. Well whenever you do go up for one. Don't hesitate to tell me.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Alright.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Yes, me too. Let me know. :)]] 01:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 11 January 2010 == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/{{#switch: 1 |
|
|
| 1 = 2010-01-11 |
|
|
| 2 = Volume 6, Issue 2 |
|
|
| 3 = 2010-01-04 |
|
|
| 4 = 2010-01-18 |
|
|
}}}} |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 08:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)</div> |
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0020 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{done}}. Deleted per your request. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 15:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Wallflowers98 sock info == |
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed your reports at ] a little bit ago. I had an encounter earlier today with both of those users and several more on ]. Here's the list. ] 04:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{user5|1=En7834}} |
|
|
*{{user5|1=Danteorange78}} |
|
|
*{{user5|1=Generation Y-Not?}} |
|
|
*{{user5|1=Soda fan90}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== BLP issue == |
|
|
|
|
|
You were involved in the BLP discussion about John Rosatti. I'm currently involved in a BLP debate that I think is very similar. In my case, there is a lurid, very contentious allegation based solely on something that a single author said in her book. She states it as fact (based on an anon source IIRC), not even an allegation. No other media source has even made the allegation, let alone repeated it as fact. This seems odd by itself, but when you consider that the subject is ], the CEO of Blackwater and far from being a media favorite, it becomes even more odd. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion here and telling me if you think I am off base? ] (]) 21:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page and on the relevant page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 00:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== vandalism? == |
|
|
|
|
|
You have a broad definition of vandalism. In the future, I strongly suggst you just butt out ] (]) 01:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Never going to happen, so you might as well give up on that tidbit, and again, I stand by what I say. At the time you left the comment, he had gone to bed. That doesn't give you the right to be an absolute jerk to him and insult him just because he didn't respond instantly. As to why he hasn't responded further, that is quite obvious: he already explained to you his reasoning. He does not have to defend himself to you, and you are the only person who thinks he is abusive. I don't expect you to apologize, but know this, if you continue on the path you are on now, you will get blocked.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 10:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:You are continuing to misrepresent my original objection. My objection was NOT that 'he didn't respond in 8 hours', or anything like that. (You portrayed that as my objection, though!). Instead, I objected that Dodo wasn't addressing MY ACTUAL OBJECTIONS. Other than his 'driveby deletions', and a template or two, he DIDN'T ''respond'' to my complaints. Not only did he not address my objections within a day (as you implied my original complaint was), he didn't even EVENTUALLY address my objections! Irresponsibly, and probably maliciously, you tried to make me look like 'the bad guy' for objecting to Dodo's repeated rapid deletions without waiting for consensus, etc. |
|
|
:Dodo was trying to act on the theory, 'if somebody does ANYTHING even arguably criticizable, I can slap him down repeatedly by deleting his edits, without waiting for any sort of consensus, etc.' (Evidently, that is your position as well.) I say, "No!". Dodo never, in detail, responded to my repeated and DETAILED complaints of his behavior. Is the reason that 'he is busy'? Well, if he's SO BUSY, |
|
|
why did he have enough time to repeatedly delete my posts? Doesn't make sense, does it? The answer is quite simple: Dodo (and, I suspect, many other self-appointed 'Info-Nazi's' ALWAYS have time to slap down other users (that's EASY, and takes little time!), but they DON'T have enough time to actually defend their own actions when challenged! Dodo (and many others) amount to semi-professional BUSYBODIES who strut their stuff by interfering with others' use of WP. Stop it. |
|
|
] (]) 08:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
Template:SPIHat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)