| Revision as of 21:15, 18 January 2010 edit16x9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers1,526 edits →OPPO Digital: removed troll← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:27, 9 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(48h) | |||
| |archive = User talk:16x9/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archives}} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == accusations of bias == | |||
| Hi, 16x9. Because you participated in ], you may be interested in ]. ] (]) 08:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| What is the merit in Yosh's claim to bias in discussion on deletion of article about Joey Fisher? --] (]) 06:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :very far removed nudging completely unfounded ] (]) 06:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::So there is no personal connection to the subject of the article? --] (]) 06:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Not from me, never met, talk, seen him (in person). ] (]) 06:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'd suggest, then, countering that claim. After a first reading, I immediately took his side, but now am beginning to see some merit in the case for deletion. Sounds like people are personally connected to this somehow, based on his comment. I got the impression that you were merely playing out some personal vendetta or something. --] (]) 06:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Is that satisfactory? ] (]) 06:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sure, as much as it can be. --] (]) 06:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Please be more careful in your Wikipolicing efforts == | |||
| Hi, 16x9! | |||
| I've reviewed your edit history just now and it seems you are not careful enough in your wikipolicing efforts against spam. You are flagging too many articles for speedy deletion without exercising due restraint, deleting sections for lack of citations instead of attempting to find citations or flagging appropriately and often deleting external links which do add value to subject articles and qualify WP:EL criteria. Your efforts to police Misplaced Pages are appreciated but please be more careful. | |||
| You might want to take a look at ]. Thanks! -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">] <small>(] / ])</small></span> 03:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I'm posting this anonymously to prevent petty politicking. ] (]) 15:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :LOL wrong. Grow a pair and comment with your login | |||
| ::Be nice. It's about the message, not the messenger. I've been involved with enough skirmishes to know making it personal won't improve Misplaced Pages. I'm not in this for the drama or the power trip. Also note that people like you, while they do serve a role in our community, can also scare away valuable contributors with their heavy handed tactics. We've lost enough contributors as it is. Remember that anonymous contributors are not a second class citizen in Misplaced Pages.In fact, that's where most of the content is coming from. | |||
| ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 17:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::What are you talking about? you come to my talk page accusing me of wrong doing with no specific diffs. you imply you have an account just aren;t using it. Not that you are "second class". So if you want to leave a message with substance and not veiled personal attacks please go for it. If not please go away. ] (]) 17:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sorry maybe I confused you. There were two separate points in my comment. One regarding careful wikipolicing conduct. The point wasn't to build a case against you with diffs and wikilawyering references to Misplaced Pages policies. The other regarding treating anonymous contributors with less respect than a logged in editor. Whether or not I have an account or whether I should be using it while contributing to Misplaced Pages in whatever fashion is none of you business. Your remarks regarding "growing a pair of balls" are uncivil. ] (]) 18:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I didn't say anything about balls. Maybe what wikipedia needs is heavy handed tactics as you put it. We are way past quantity or articles and should focus on quality. It almost seems like you are editing annonymously because you are not allowed to edit logged in. Please keep you filth all my talkpage. 22:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Don't be coy you know what you said. Instead of investing your energy in making it difficult and unpleasant for others to contribute to Misplaced Pages it would be nice if you could redirect your energy into a more positive role. Uncivil self-styled wikicops such as yourself are scaring the real contributors away. Please, there are more appropriate outlets for your aggression.] (]) 23:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::LOL again what the fuck are you talking about? diffs would be nice? if not leave me alone. ] (]) 23:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| == Ruby on Rails == | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| Hi. You recently marked all the sites in the "Rails in Production" with {or}s (one of them twice) and even applied that to an HTML comment. Also, I am not sure how this is applicable; the section cites a source at the beginning and all the sites listed publicly state that they use Rails. If you still feel that listing these sites constitutes "original research", can you elaborate? Thanks! ] (]) 15:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The section cites a first party source making the claim ]. I highly recommend you not label my edits as vandalism and you revert your previous edit on ]. ] (]) 17:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::You may be right that I labeled it "vandalism" prematurely, but your edit lacked an explanation and resembled such. I will not revert my edit, but thank you for your advice. ] (]) 19:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Don't use tools if you need to edit slower. ] (]) 19:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| == Miami33139 == | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know anything about that. I do know that you called another editor an idiot which is a personal attack. Please ]. ] (]) 02:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| == What's that ??? == | |||
| Hello 16x9, this is a message from an ] to inform you that the page you created, ], has been marked for ] by ]. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see ]). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>" to the page text, and edit the {{#if:Air Sharing|]|talk page}} to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at ]. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see ]. Thanks, - ] (]) on behalf of {{user|Miguel.mateo}} 07:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, I'm interested in writing about a church. Are churches notable enough for wikipedia articles? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Just move ahead and block me from editing. I am not going to contribute to delitionpedia anyhow. I am running my own fork, ] (]) 22:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion has begun about whether the article ], which you created or to which you contributed, should be ]. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. | |||
| You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] ] 09:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ]Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to ]. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at ], along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the ] if you have any questions, or you can ask them at ]. See ] for info on how to not get these messages. ] (]) 17:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Does not meet ] or ].</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 03:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 03:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:27, 9 January 2022
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2010 February 28#Simple Instant Messenger
Hi, 16x9. Because you participated in Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 14, you may be interested in Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2010 February 28#Simple Instant Messenger. Cunard (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Silverfleet Capital
Hi, 16x9!
You might want to take a look at Misplaced Pages's Notability Guidelines. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Air Sharing
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Air Sharing. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Air Sharing. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Air Sharing
Hello 16x9, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Air Sharing, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Miguel.mateo. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Miguel.mateo. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Miguel.mateo (talk · contribs) 07:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I'm interested in writing about a church. Are churches notable enough for wikipedia articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgiasouthernlynn (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Air Sharing for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Sharing, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Air Sharing until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cybercobra (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Kennesaw State University logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Misplaced Pages non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Misplaced Pages talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Appbox Pro
The article Appbox Pro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CHAMPION 03:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Appbox Pro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appbox Pro is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Appbox Pro (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION 03:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)