Revision as of 21:31, 25 January 2010 editSulmues (talk | contribs)22,787 edits →Block evading IP of indef blocked user giving out barnstars← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:49, 6 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,268 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Ckatz/Archive 13) (botTag: Manual revert | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span id="RealTitle" style="display:none">''User talk:''Ckatz</span> | <span id="RealTitle" style="display:none">''User talk:''Ckatz</span> | ||
{{User:Ckatz/Talknote}} | {{User:Ckatz/Talknote}} | ||
{| class="infobox" width="150" | {| class="infobox" width="150" | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
| ]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>] | | ]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>] | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}{{archive-nav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}{{archive-nav}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 200K | |maxarchivesize = 200K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 13 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(5d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Ckatz/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Ckatz/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:Ckatz/Archive Index|mask=User talk:Ckatz/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
{{TOChidden}} | {{TOChidden}} | ||
== GAR notification == | |||
== Reverted changes - please explain == | |||
], an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. | |||
Please let me know why you reverted the changes to: | |||
== WikiCup 2018 November newsletter == | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&direction=prev&oldid=337361167 | |||
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our '''Champion''' this year is {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}}, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows: | |||
I had posted the following information, directly related to the subject, which has factual evidence supporting it.... | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} | |||
The decision has subsequently given rise to a grassroots protest group, created by Christopher White on December 30, 2009, on the Facebook website entitled "Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament" which has been featured in global news headlines and attracted a membership of over 150,000 in its first 12 days of being online. | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kees08}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|SounderBruce}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Nova Crystallis}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Iazyges}} | |||
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Ceranthor}} | |||
== Noel Browne - a version == | |||
All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants: | |||
The entry on Noel Browne is based entirely on a shoddy biography written by one of his political opponents, and evidently amplified since by others. It apparently is low-enough temperature scurrility to make it onto the Misplaced Pages page. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2. | |||
How is it that "public opinion" - all of it ! - turns against Noel Browne's book 'Against The Tide' when it happened to be the biggest non-fiction bestseller in Ireland that year? Gill and MacMillan, his publisher, were over the moon with its success. Check it. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Cartoon network freak}} wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Usernameunique }} wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Zanhe}} wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall. | |||
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Aoba47}} wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1. | |||
Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient! | |||
How is it too that every single criticism (without evidence) is deemed correct and Browne in every single instance wrong? A little skepticism toward both sides in a clash would be warranted. The entry is unrelievedly denigratory and needs to be balanced. ] (]) 06:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. | |||
== cmt == | |||
Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to ''']'''; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Godot13}}, {{user4|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{User4|Vanamonde93}}. | |||
== Seregain == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=866078143 --> | |||
== WikiCup 2022 September newsletter == | |||
I'll avoid removing his comments in the future. Personally I believe this editor is an evangelical Christian POV-pusher and possibly a sockpuppet of a banned editor based on his edits, including his 1st edit which was a well-formed AFD for ] (I've already notified an admin about this and added my evidence to a WP:AN/I thread started by Seregain). His comments in his latest AFD were essentially trying to discredit sources by attacking their owners personally, so I considered them disruptive. But in the future I won't remove them (on the same note, I think it's fair to warn Seregain not to remove my comments from talk pages as well). Thanks.--] (]) 18:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== |
== WikiCup 2023 September newsletter == | ||
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were | |||
I wrote you concerning this article via Wiki email, and pursuant to the Wiki suggestions, am posting you a note advising that the email was sent.--] (]) 05:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*{{flagicon|New York (state)}} ], with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by | |||
== Overlinked == | |||
*{{flagicon image|Transgender Pride flag.svg|link=Transgender}} ], with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was | |||
*{{flagicon image|Flag of Mars.svg|link=Mars}} ], with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points. | |||
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition. | |||
I noticed your edit to the {{Tl|Overlinked}} and its documentation. I was not really necessary to warn against using this template only in severe cases, since I have been monitoring its use for the last half year, and it has been used less than 10 times, and only in severe cases. ] (]) 12:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from ].</small> | |||
== Ckatz why do you remove my addition? == | |||
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Misplaced Pages and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. ] (]), and ] (]) | |||
http://www.zionism-israel.com/ is an excellent hasbarah source, Why don't you let my addition stay? | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1172692052 --> | |||
Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Deletion of My Edits == | |||
Hello, | |||
I have noted that you have deleted a number of my edits, I think most of them. Is the Misplaced Pages policy that one cannot cite one's own work on a page? You have attributed my edits to self promotion, but I do not see it that way at all. Academic texts are not a product in the sense of a trade book. They are not written for profits--rarely make one in fact--and help extend the subject matter on an issue. In the Amusement Park page, as one example, you deleted my Theme Park reference. This is the only text that has been written in terms of covering the entirety of the theme park form. Perhaps you deleted it because it did not directly address a section in the article, but I searched for Futrell's four books (which are listed in the further readings as well) and they are not referenced in the article. My sense is that you are selectively targeting my edits. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Theming Page == | |||
On the page for Theming, you deleted my reference that was cited in the main article. | |||
It now reads: | |||
Theming is the "the use of an overarching theme, such as western, to create a holistic and integrated spatial organization of a consumer venue." Theme | |||
The citation needed is a result of your deletion of the source that accompanies it. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== RE: Tonight Show == | |||
Thanks for stepping in, I agree with you protecting the article (regardless of who's revision was in place) so that civil talk page discussion could take place. You are welcome to join the discussion if you like, as it appears we need another opinion on the matter. — ''']''' <sup>(] </sup> | <small>])</small> 18:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion of Edits == | |||
I recently reviewed the policy on citations from Misplaced Pages: | |||
"Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest. Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason, but only if it is notable and conforms to the content policies. Excessive self-citation is strongly discouraged. When in doubt, defer to the community's opinion." | |||
In terms of my edits on Amusement Parks: | |||
(1) Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest. | |||
* I do not see this as a violation. | |||
(2) Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason. | |||
* This seems to be subjective as you have not allowed it to be 'within reason' | |||
(3) "if it is notable" | |||
* It's one of the few books on the topics that considers the subject in an exclusive sense. | |||
I question your objectivity on these reedits. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== More on Deletions == | |||
I just reviewed this Misplaced Pages policy: | |||
"This policy does not prohibit editors with specialist knowledge from adding their knowledge to Misplaced Pages, but it does prohibit them from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing reliable sources. If an editor has published the results of his or her research in a reliable publication, the editor may cite that source while writing in the third person and complying with our neutrality policy. See also Misplaced Pages's guidelines on conflict of interest." | |||
As I see it, | |||
(1) This policy does not prohibit editors with specialist knowledge from adding their knowledge to Misplaced Pages | |||
* I have specialist knowledge | |||
(2) but it does prohibit them from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing reliable sources | |||
* I have cited reliable sources | |||
(3) If an editor has published the results of his or her research in a reliable publication | |||
* These are peer-reviewed publications (not web sites or personal blogs) | |||
(4) the editor may cite that source while writing in the third person and complying with our neutrality policy | |||
* I have written all in a third-person format. | |||
] (]) 19:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Block evading IP of indef blocked user giving out barnstars == | |||
This IP , whom you recently blocked for being a sock of indef blocked ], has been giving out barnstars to encourage his fellow nationals . Is this acceptable? The way I see it, as Lceliku was indefed for TOV, he shouldn't be allowed to go around evading his block and giving out barnstars or making any other kinds of edits. Otherwise we are encouraging the block evasion. Thanks, ] (]) 21:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:The IP above mentioned is a SUSPECTED sock of ] and blocked for two weeks. There is no proof that this user IS Lceliku. I accepted the barnstar even though ] tried to revert my user page . He also broke the 3RR rule through this . I think it's in my right to accept a barnstar and also report who trolls my page and talk page.] (]) --Sulmues 21:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:49, 6 January 2025
User talk:Ckatz
Ckatz is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to use email. I'll check in when I can, but please understand that circumstances may create a significant delay between when you post and when I am able to respond. Thanks for your patience and understanding. |
Hello! Thanks for dropping by... please feel free to leave me a message below. I don't have a convention as to where I'll respond, be it here, your talk page, or the talk page of the subject we're discussing - but I'll do my best to keep things clear. Let me know if you have a preference... now, get typing! Ckatz |
---|
|
Index Page One Page Two Page Three Page Four Page Five Page Six Page Seven Page Eight Page Nine Page Ten |
Frequently asked questions
- Where can I learn more about editing Misplaced Pages?
- The best place to start is at the Help Desk. Other useful links include the style guide, the list of policies and guidelines, and the guide to editing. Please feel free to ask on my talk page if you have any questions.
- Why was the link I added removed from an article?
- Typically, links are removed because they fail the external links guideline. Although many links are deleted because they were placed by spammers, links to good sites are also removed on a regular basis. This is because Misplaced Pages isn't a directory service; the mere fact a site exists does not mean it warrants a link.
- Why was my article deleted?
- Pages can be deleted for many reasons; there are very specific criteria that govern the process. Please review this article for more information.
- Why was information relating to my company or organization removed?
- This is a very common question, based on a misunderstanding of Misplaced Pages's purpose. This project is not a directory, forum, or search engine, and as such it is not a place for you to post advertisements about your company or your product.
- Why were my spelling changes reverted?
- Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style recommends the use of regional varieties of English, based on the topic and the article's contribution history. Please avoid changing spellings unless they differ from the appropriate version. Most spell checking software can be configured to use British and American English; some extend this to include other varieties such as Canadian or Australian English.
Contents |
---|
GAR notification
Calvin and Hobbes, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
WikiCup 2018 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:
- Courcelles (submissions)
- Kosack (submissions)
- Kees08 (submissions)
- SounderBruce (submissions)
- Cas Liber (submissions)
- Nova Crystallis (submissions)
- Iazyges (submissions)
- Ceranthor (submissions)
All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:
- Cas Liber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
- Courcelles (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
- Kosack (submissions) wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
- Cartoon network freak (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
- Usernameunique (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
- Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
- Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.
Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.
Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
- Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
- Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Misplaced Pages and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)