| Revision as of 04:37, 9 January 2006 editBrianH123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users545 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:48, 25 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive 4) (bot |
| (634 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
==Changes== |
|
|
|
{{Censor}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
This article had a strong bias towards quasi-feminist views of the facial--that a facial always represents subjugation of women and so on. That's a fringe view of (mostly male) feminist academics. I have rewritten the article to make it more balanced, but the quasi-feminist view is still represented. In addition some of the article was poorly written and I tried to clean that up--a facial is an ejaculation, not a depositing. If you drip semen from a cup onto someone's face, you may have deposited semen but you haven't given a facial. Thanks. |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=mid}} |
|
=="Disrespectful"?== |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
Here is a quote from this article: |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 125K |
|
|
|
|
|
|counter = 4 |
|
Some people consider this act disrespectful to the person on the receiving end, although some people do receive sexual pleasure from it, and some claim that since the human face is an amalgam of our most unique physical characteristics - it is an expression of the desire to copulate directly with the most intimate part of one's partner. Whether it is really an act of disrespect depends on the mutual perceptions and intentions of the participants. |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
What do you believe? |
|
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
i think this line |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
"The people that claim a facial is "disrespectul" and don't engage in it however, are most likely very conservative people who refuse to explore and experience in life." |
|
|
|
|
|
is a little 'disrespectful' towards people who don't enjoy the act - it doesn't make them conservative, it just means they may not like it ! |
|
|
|
|
|
==Related information?== |
|
|
Does anyone know where there is related information (book, webpage, other) similar to this article. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Substitute sex act?== |
|
|
|
|
|
It is OK to consider this act as a substitute sex act for those girls who are not yet ready to engage in other sexual activities. In my experience most girls like to remain passive while ejaculation on their face is occuring, mostly to avoid other areas, specially their hair, from receiving the semen |
|
|
|
|
|
==Pictures?== |
|
|
|
|
|
What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye. |
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't really think sarcasm is necessary here. As for no picture, I think the description is more than adequate ] 20:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Removal of link == |
|
|
|
|
|
Removed the link to . It is a pay site and not really relavent to the page as the topic is description of the act, not the act in pornography as such ] 20:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Silly== |
|
|
|
|
|
Much of this article comes across as silly. "Some people think it's disrespectful." "Others don't." "It's OK if both partners are into it." "Don't get semen in my eye." (OK, some of these are paraphrases.) And to cap it all off, "A facial may also occur accidentally." (not a paraphrase) Why don't we just say what a facial is and leave all the angst out of it? ] 04:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
.svg){kind=small}
