Revision as of 06:29, 27 February 2010 editVerkhovensky (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,489 editsm Removed category 1885 in law; Quick-adding category 1885 in United States case law (using HotCat)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:20, 13 September 2023 edit undoSer Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,319,341 edits add "use mdy dates" templateTag: AWB | ||
(19 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} | |||
{{SCOTUSCase | |||
⚫ | {{Infobox SCOTUS case | ||
|Litigants=Hardin v. Boyd | |Litigants=Hardin v. Boyd | ||
|SubmitDate=December 22 | |||
|ArgueDate= January 5 | |||
| |
|SubmitYear=1884 | ||
|DecideDate= |
|DecideDate=March 15 | ||
|DecideYear=1885 | |DecideYear=1885 | ||
|FullName=Hardin v. Boyd | |FullName=Hardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others | ||
|USVol=113 | |USVol=113 | ||
|USPage= |
|USPage=756 | ||
|ParallelCitations=5 S. Ct. 771; 28 ] 1141 | |||
|Citation= | |||
|Prior= | |Prior= | ||
|Subsequent= | |Subsequent= | ||
|Holding= | |Holding= | ||
⚫ | |Majority=Harlan | ||
|SCOTUS=1882-1887 | |||
⚫ | |JoinMajority=''unanimous'' | ||
⚫ | |Majority= | ||
⚫ | |JoinMajority= | ||
|LawsApplied= | |LawsApplied= | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', |
'''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a ] on county bonds issued in aid of a ]. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The ] brought a writ of error to reverse it. Subsequently, to the judgment, the county settled with the ] and other ], by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. Fraud and collusion was alleged in the handling of a will which transferred ownership of property in ]. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.<ref>{{ussc|name=Hardin v. Boyd|volume=113|page=756|pin=|year=1885}}.</ref> | ||
The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed. | The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed. | ||
== |
== References == | ||
⚫ | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* {{caselaw source | |||
* ''Justia.com'' (full case) | |||
| case = ''Hardin v. Boyd'', {{Ussc|113|756|1885|el=no}} | |||
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/113/756/ | |||
⚫ | {{SCOTUS |
||
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep113/usrep113756/usrep113756.pdf | |||
}} | |||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
Latest revision as of 02:20, 13 September 2023
1885 United States Supreme Court case
Hardin v. Boyd | |
---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
Submitted December 22, 1884 Decided March 15, 1885 | |
Full case name | Hardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others |
Citations | 113 U.S. 756 (more)5 S. Ct. 771; 28 L. Ed. 1141 |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Harlan, joined by unanimous |
Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a lawsuit on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ of error to reverse it. Subsequently, to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. Fraud and collusion was alleged in the handling of a will which transferred ownership of property in Crittenden County, Arkansas. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.
The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.
References
External links
- Text of Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885) is available from: Justia Library of Congress
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |