| Revision as of 05:41, 10 March 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,972 editsm Signing comment by 86.142.29.137 - "Formatting of Filmography table"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:02, 24 November 2024 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,575,184 edits Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2024-11-23. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{talkheader|noarchive=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{WPBiography |living=yes |class=C |musician-work-group=yes|musician-priority=Mid |filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=Mid |listas=Cyrus, Miley}} |
|
|
|
| action1 = GAN |
|
{{WP Disney |class=C |importance=High |listas=Cyrus, Miley}} |
|
|
|
| action1date = March 1, 2014 |
|
}} |
|
|
|
| action1link = Talk:Miley Cyrus/GA1 |
|
{{press |collapsed=yes |
|
|
|
| action1result = Failed |
|
|author=Stephen Foley |
|
|
|
| action1oldid= 597687918 |
|
|date=February 3, 2009 |
|
|
|url=http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1625816.html |
|
|
|title=Is Misplaced Pages cracking up? |
|
|
|org=] |
|
|
|section=February 2009 |
|
|
|author2= |
|
|
|date2=August 17, 2009 |
|
|
|url2=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |
|
|
|title2=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|org2=] |
|
|
| author3=Gene Byrd |
|
|
| title3=Misplaced Pages and Editor: Robert Pattinson & Miley Cyrus Hoaxes Cause Changes? |
|
|
| org3=The National Ledger |
|
|
| url3=http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=40&num=27568 |
|
|
| date3=August 26, 2009 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Archive box|search=yes|<!--archive links within the earlier archives will be broken because proper archiving procedure was not followed--> |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action2 = GAN |
|
}} |
|
|
|
| action2date = April 9, 2014 |
|
|
| action2link = Talk:Miley Cyrus/GA2 |
|
|
| action2result = Listed |
|
|
| action2oldid= 603259627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action3 = PR |
|
== GA == |
|
|
|
| action3date = April 25, 2014 |
|
|
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Miley Cyrus/archive1 |
|
|
| action3result = not reviewed |
|
|
| action3oldid= 605748171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action4=FAC |
|
Anybody thought about nominating this for GA? It's comprehensive and there are no major issues with the content as far as I can see. I'd be happy to review it if someone were to nominate it... ] | ] 22:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action4date= 6 May 2014 |
|
:'''No''' The article is comprehensive, but there's still a lot of clean-up that needs to be done throughout the entire article. I wouldn't nominate it at this time. – <i><font color="#6600FF">Ker</font><font color="#6633FF">αun</font><font color="#6666FF">oςc</font><font color="#6699FF">op</font><font color="#66CCFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 02:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Miley Cyrus/archive1 |
|
::Yes, there's a lot of dead/dubious/non-existent refs, and the prose is pretty poor in the larger sections. I've been thinking about doing a complete overhaul of the article though, so maybe a month or two from now? <font face="georgia" color="#E8A317">]</font>✽<font face="georgia" color="deeppink">]</font> 05:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action4result=failed |
|
:::Sure. If you want a fast track review, just drop me a line when you think it's ready. It's definitely do-able. ] | ] 15:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action4oldid= 607209374 |
|
:I went through and made all the dates consistent for the references, but in doing that, I noticed a lot of citations weren't in proper {{tl|cite}} format; a lot of information could be added. – <i><font color="#6600FF">Ker</font><font color="#6633FF">αun</font><font color="#6666FF">oςc</font><font color="#6699FF">op</font><font color="#66CCFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 06:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action5 = PR |
|
== Cell Phone Pics == |
|
|
|
| action5date = 18 March 2017 |
|
|
| acgjhfds§tion5link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Miley Cyrus/archive2 |
|
|
| action5result = reviewed |
|
|
| action5oldid= 770472085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| currentstatus = GA |
|
Should there be no mention of the cell phone pics in the "controversies" section? It seems to me that that would be a fair controversy. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
| topic = Media and drama |
|
|
|
|
|
|otd1date=2018-11-23|otd1oldid=870227064 |
|
:According to ], "If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article—even if it's negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If it is not documented by reliable third-party sources, leave it out." This topic was already discussed in the ] and it looks like the outcome was that there weren't any reliable sources that confirmed the images were even of Miley, which goes directly against BLP policy. –<i><font color="#6600FF">Ker</font><font color="#6633FF">αun</font><font color="#6666FF">oςc</font><font color="#6699FF">op</font><font color="#66CCFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 21:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|otd2date=2024-11-23|otd2oldid=1259029025 |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
==Noah== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell| collapsed = yes |
|
Miley Cyrus Has a younger sister called Noah <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
| blp = yes |
|
:We have an article on her- ]. Cheers, <font face="georgia" color="#E8A317">]</font>✽<font face="georgia" color="deeppink">]</font> 20:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Cyrus, Miley| 1 = |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-work-group=yes |musician-priority=Mid |filmbio-work-group=yes |filmbio-priority=Mid }} |
|
== ] Referencing system == |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Disney|importance=High }} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Twofingered Typist|date=March 6, 2017}} |
|
The {{tl|reflist}} template allows for list-defined references, meaning all references are placed into the References section. This frees up a lot of clutter within the article in edit mode. This is an incredible advantage for those of us who don't use special software. You may look at ] for a very simple explanation of exactly what is happening, or: |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Miley Cyrus|importance=Top}} |
|
# You may add/edit/remove references by editing the ''References'' section |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Pop music|importance=mid}} |
|
# Every reference would have a name assigned to it. For example, <code><nowiki><ref name="rollingstone">{{cite web |url=...}}</ref></nowiki></code> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Tennessee|importance=mid }} |
|
# Every citation only requires the <code><nowiki><ref name=xxxxxxxx/></nowiki></code> segment |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Hip hop|importance=mid}} |
|
# <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> citations will still work; the LDR system merely adds the convenience of moving references down if desired |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
For an example, please open up the ] article in edit mode to see how easy it is to read. I can do this extremely quickly and have been converting some of the more stable articles I'm close to. Before I can change the style for ], because this article has heavy traffic and is edited frequently by many, I would need consensus for a go-ahead. Any thoughts? – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 04:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
::Awesome idea ..!! i didnt know abt this feature of wikipedia.....i guess very few articles follow this feature.....You definitely have a thumbs up from me....all the best....] (]) 16:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{press|date=August 27, 2009|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6099890/Wikipedia-Top-20-people-places-film-and-technology-articles.html|title=Misplaced Pages: Top 20 people, places, film and technology articles|org='']''|author=James Steyn}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{All time pageviews|90}} |
|
:::I only recently discovered it also. I swung by to add that <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> tags added throughout the article still appear in the References section. So really, anyone aware of the LDR style could help with the maintenance by moving references down if need be. So converting this article would not affect any future edits for users unaware of the changes (it can be easy to miss, actually). I added a fourth item to the list above. – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 16:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Annual report|], ], ], and ]}} |
|
::::Makes it a real pain to edit subsections, though, which is what I usually do. This way, the edit always has to be in both sections.—](]) 17:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Top 25 report |
|
|
|
|
|
| August 25, 2013 |
|
:::::I edit sub-sections frequently as well, and what you say is true. |
|
|
|
| September 8, 2013 |
|
:::::# You don't need to follow suit; you can edit as normal, including placing references within the prose. Someone like me would come along and move them down when a section "stabilizes" or becomes overly-cluttered. |
|
|
|
| September 15, 2013 |
|
:::::# When editing, I'll simply create the references at the bottom of the sub-section edit window, then proceed to edit the section as normal. Then I'll move the references with a (cmd-X) cut and paste them in a follow-up edit to the References section. The drawback is a brief "cite error" at the bottom of the article during the period between the two edits. |
|
|
|
| September 22, 2013 |
|
:::::# However, and being new to the LDR style, we may see that this is more of a nuisance for a heavy traffic article, so I'm definitely open to the idea of it being a "bad idea" here. |
|
|
|
| September 29, 2013 |
|
:::::–<i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 17:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| October 6, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
| December 23, 2018 |
|
:Well, after using the LDR style in a few articles, one of which has higher traffic, I think the style is more suited to stable articles. Editing sub-sections, like ] pointed out, can be a pain if you're editing on a frequent or regular basis. So I'll have to admit that this style would be both time-consuming and a touch annoying on the Miley Cyrus article, plus I'm finding I'm having less time to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and it wouldn't be fair to ask others to keep the article "clean" of references, which was something I would have otherwise been happy to do (I'm currently doing this on other articles with pleasure, but it ''could'' otherwise get tiresome). Thanks Gprince007 and Kww for your thoughts. – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 02:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| August 11, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
| February 4, 2024 |
|
== Controversies - Update == |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
Anyone notice that the controversies are not written at all? |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
For example, the Miley-Selena you-tube conflict in absolutely unmentioned. It seems that someone erased the article before the page was protected. |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) date</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
|
|counter = 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
:Did you try doing a search through the archives regarding Selena? The results can be found . Archives of talk pages are usually found at the top of the talk page (in this case, in a column on the top right side). I'm not otherwise familiar with any YouTube conflict, and if it wasn't reported by several news outlets, I'm not sure how notable enough it would be for inclusion in the article. – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 15:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Miley Cyrus/Archive %(counter)d |
|
::Hey, thanks for responding. Some references to the incident are given below. |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
*(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqwbCywY72Y) - Here's a link to the Selena-Demi video |
|
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
*(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fzX92p2czw) - Here's a link to the Miley-Mandy parody of the Selena-Demi video |
|
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
*(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/25/miley-cyrus-mocks-selena_n_115072.html) - Here's a link to this regarding the incident in a major newspaper site. |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
I hope that was helpful. |
|
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
--] (]) 14:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:My memory of this discussion was that the conclusion was basically "so what?". Two Disney kids insulting each other isn't of any particular importance.—](]) 14:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::It may be if it is popular enough to appear on so many sites and news sources. --] (]) 14:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Signature == |
|
|
|
|
|
That signature doesn't seem to be official, tracing to the original file on Commons leads it to be created by a user who has no affiliation with Miley Cyrus, and was created entirely by himself, so how is it actually her signature?. ] (]) 01:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
: This is a point that I fully support. The Commons says this - "This file is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship." Even if Miley's signature looks like this, someone might have copied it out and put it in the article. The signature on the album booklet of the album "Hannah Montana - Best of Both Worlds", page 18, must be the authentic one. --] (]) 14:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::<s>If there was one real reason I would question its authenticity, it is simply because it looks like someone stumbled on the tail of the Y, almost "forgetting" to curve back around. It's likely that it's a re-creation of Miley's signature, minus the "Cyrus" part. A Google search shows her signature seems more consistently smooth and round and less "angular", especially in the y and the two-piece heart over the i, as can be seen , , and . I don't know what the "GA Smiley Face" is all about.</s> –<i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 17:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::<s> you can clearly see the tail of the Y looks like it was drawn in two parts.</s> – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 17:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::::You should not evaluate the SVG image to determine whether it is authentic or not. Look at the image that stated as the source for the vector version. Rendering SVGs at a large size will nearly always look strange when the SVG was generated via bitmap tracing, which is what I did in this case. ]]] 17:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::That said, I have no opinion on whether the image is correct or not. If the consensus here is that another version is (more) representative of her normal style, I can try to vectorize that and upload it over the present image. ]]] 17:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::Good point. The original uploaded image is , uploaded by ]. A quick look at the details of a few of his ] show that he has a history of uploading images that are questionable regarding fair use or have been tagged for possibly violating copyrights, and his ] is full of image violations that have since been deleted. The image in question, Miley Cyrus's signature, was up for deletion with , but the result was '''keep''', although it was never established that the signature is authentic. – <i><font color="#8C0099">Ker</font><font color="#BA00CC">αun</font><font color="#E900FF">oςc</font><font color="#ED33FF">op</font><font color="#F166FF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5100CC">]</font></sub></i> 22:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== new picture of miley == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== So many photographs? == |
|
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2010/03/miley-cyrus-liam-hemsworth-oscars-party-pair.jpg |
|
|
please use this URL. its a picture of miley at the academy awardds 2010. she looked gorgeous, so it would be a good picture to have up as her picture. if you want to find a different picture of her from the 2010 academy awards, feel free. PLEASE DO IT BECAUSE THERE SHOULD BE AN UPDATED PICTURE OF HER, SINCE THE PICTURE UP RIGHT NOW IS FROM THE 2009 ACADEMY AWARDS. PLEASE DO IT. OR I WILL GET MAD!!!! JUST KIDDING.....kinda <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Sorry, but for pictures of living people Misplaced Pages can only use "free" images, images that have been released into the ]. In other words, in order for a picture to be used on Misplaced Pages, it must not be copyright restricted. <font face="arial" color="#E8A317">]</font>✽<font face="arial" color="deeppink">]</font> 04:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the article really need so many photographs of her? It seems grossly disproportionate compared with other articles about people. ] (]) 20:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Formatting of Filmography table== |
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
I am always hesitant to jump into an edit war, but I see that one is occurring with regards to the formatting of the Filmography table. This is the first time I have heard of a war over formatting a table, but nonetheless. And I don't even know this Miley Cyrus creature - never heard of her until I happened to stumble onto this page via a link from another page. Nonetheless, this is what I think: I have looked at both formats, and I find the formatting with the coloured background headings to be much easier on the eye. I wish all tables in Misplaced Pages were done like that. So why not leave it with the coloured headings? Is it that big of a deal. I mean, I would think that the average person would say that coloured headings make it easier to immediately comprehend. Just my thoughts on this important topic. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Mileu Cyrus}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
The redirect Mileu Cyrus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5 § Mileu Cyrus until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)