Misplaced Pages

Gita Sahgal: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:49, 18 March 2010 editEpeefleche (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers150,049 editsm Filling in 12 references using Reflinks | fixed dashes using a script | Script assisted date formatting | wp:datescript-assisted date/terms audit; see wp:unlinkdates, wp:overlink← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:35, 24 October 2024 edit undoAnand Michael.V (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users516 edits topTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source 
(286 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Indian writer and journalist (born 1956 or 1957)}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
{{Infobox person {{Infobox person
| name = Gita Sahgal | name = Gita Sahgal
| image = | image = Gita Sahgal 3.png
| image_size = | image_size =
| alt = | alt =
| caption = | caption = Sahgal speaking in London, July 2017
| birth_name = | birth_name =
| birth_date = {{Birth based on age as of date|df=yes|53|2010|February|7}} | birth_date = {{Birth based on age as of date|df=yes|53|2010|February|7}}
| birth_place = India | birth_place = ], India
| death_date = <!-- {{death date and age|df=yes|YYYY|MM|DD|YYYY|MM|DD}} --> | death_date = <!-- {{death date and age|df=yes|YYYY|MM|DD|YYYY|MM|DD}} -->
| death_place = | death_place =
| body_discovered = | body_discovered =
| death_cause = | death_cause =
| resting_place = | resting_place =
| resting_place_coordinates = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LONG|display=inline,title}} --> | resting_place_coordinates = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LONG|display=inline,title}} -->
| residence = England | nationality =
| nationality = | citizenship = United Kingdom
| ethnicity = | other_names =
| citizenship = | alma_mater = ]<ref name="up"/>
| other_names = | employer =
| notable works =
| known_for = Suspended by Amnesty as head of its Gender Unit, after criticizing it for its links with ]
| occupation = {{hlist|]|]|]|]}}
| education =
| years_active =
| alma_mater = ]<ref name="up"/>
| networth =
| employer = ]; Head of Gender Unit<ref name="npr"/>
| notable works = | height =
| title =
| occupation = Writer, journalist, film director, ].
| years_active = | term =
| home_town = | predecessor =
| salary = | successor =
| networth = | party =
| height = | opponents =
| weight = | boards =
| title = | spouse =
| term = | partner =
| predecessor = | children =
| successor = | parents = ] (mother)
| relations = ] (grandmother)<br/>] (great uncle)
| party =
| opponents = | callsign =
| boards = | awards =
| religion = Atheist | signature =
| spouse = | signature_alt =
| partner = | website =
| children = | footnotes =
| parents = ] (mother) | misc =
| relations = ] (grandmother); ] (great uncle)
| callsign =
| awards =
| signature =
| signature_alt =
| website =
| footnotes =
| box_width =
| misc =
}} }}
'''Gita Sahgal''' (born 1956 or 1957)<ref name="guardian1">{{cite news|author=Mark Townsend |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/25/gita-sahgal-amnesty-international|title=Gita Sahgal's dispute with Amnesty International puts human rights group in the dock |work= The Observer |date= 25 April 2010|access-date=27 April 2010 | location=London}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news |author=Suroor |first=Hasan |date=9 February 2010 |title=Amnesty in row over 'collaborating' with pro-jehadis |journal=] |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article103279.ece |url-status=dead |access-date=18 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100822084556/https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article103279.ece |archive-date=2010-08-22}}</ref> is a British ], ], ], ] and ], whose work focusses on the issues of feminism, fundamentalism and racism.<ref name="dd">{{cite news |last1=Guttenplan |first1=D. D. |last2=Margaronis |first2=Maria |title=Who Speaks for Human Rights? |work=] |url=http://www.thenation.com/article/who-speaks-human-rights/ |url-status=dead |accessdate=12 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305004719/https://www.thenation.com/article/who-speaks-human-rights/ |archive-date=2017-03-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6iy0cLkigiEC&q=%22Gita+Sahgal%22&pg=PA205 |title=The situated politics of belonging – Google Books |access-date=4 March 2010|isbn=9781412921015 |last1=Yuval-Davis |first1=Nira |last2=Kannabiran |first2=Kalpana |last3=Kannabirān |first3=Kalpana |last4=Vieten |first4=Ulrike |last5=Kannabiran |first5=Professor Regional Director Council for Social Development Kalpana |date=10 August 2006 }}</ref>
'''Gita Sahgal''', born {{Birth based on age as of date|df=yes|53|2010|February|7}} in ],<ref>{{cite web|author=Hasan Suroor |url=http://beta.thehindu.com/news/international/article103279.ece |title=Suroor, Hasan, "Amnesty in row over “collaborating” with pro-jehadis", The Hindu, 9 February 2010, accessed 16 February 2010 |publisher=Beta.thehindu.com |date=9 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> is a writer and journalist on issues of ], ], and ], a director of prize-winning documentary films, and a ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=6iy0cLkigiEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA205&dq=%22Gita+Sahgal%22&ots=AH_aL6Fol5&sig=lucO7p8ZlbF5dVOGtjYksPRKQ7M#v=onepage&q=%22Gita%20Sahgal%22&f=false |title=The situated politics of belonging – Google Books |publisher=Books.google.com |date= |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref>


Sahgal has battled suppression of women by religious fundamentalists.<ref>{{cite web|author=Amit Roy |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100210/jsp/frontpage/story_12088582.jsp |title=The Telegraph – Calcutta (Kolkata) &#124; Frontpage &#124; Amnesty suspends Nehru kin |publisher=Telegraphindia.com |date=10 February 2010 |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref> She has been a co-founder and active member of women's organizations.<ref name="up"/><ref name="fund"/> She has also been head of ]'s Gender Unit, and one of Amnesty's leading voices against oppression of women.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.variant.org.uk/16texts/WAF.html |title=Women Against Fundamentalisms &#124; Variant 16 |publisher=Variant.org.uk |date= |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref><ref name="fund"/> She has been a co-founder and active member of women's organisations.<ref name="up"/><ref name="fund"/> She has also been head of ]'s Gender Unit, and has opposed the oppression of women in particular by religious fundamentalists.<ref name="fund"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.variant.org.uk/16texts/WAF.html |title=Women Against Fundamentalisms &#124; Variant 16 |publisher=Variant.org.uk |access-date=4 March 2010 |archive-date=10 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910224143/http://www.variant.org.uk/16texts/WAF.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Amit Roy |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100210/jsp/frontpage/story_12088582.jsp |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120911225126/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100210/jsp/frontpage/story_12088582.jsp |url-status=dead |archive-date=11 September 2012 |title=The Telegraph – Calcutta (Kolkata) &#124; Amnesty suspends Nehru kin |work=The Telegraph|location=Calcutta |date=10 February 2010 |access-date=4 March 2010}}</ref>


In February 2010 she was suspended by Amnesty as head of its Gender Unit after she was quoted by '']'' in an article about Amnesty, criticizing Amnesty for its high-profile associations with ], the director of a campaign group called ], whom she referred to as "Britain's most famous supporter of the ]".<ref name="sigstate"/> Amnesty responded that she was not suspended "for raising these issues internally." Among those who spoke up in her support was ]. In February 2010, she was suspended by Amnesty as head of its Gender Unit after she was quoted by '']'' criticising Amnesty for its high-profile associations with ], director of the campaign group ] (formerly Cageprisoners), that represents men detained at Guantanamo under extrajudicial conditions. She referred to him as "Britain's most famous supporter of the ]".<ref name="sigstate">{{Cite journal|title=Gita Sahgal: A Statement|journal=The New York Review of Books|last=Sahgal|first=Gita|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/may/13/statement-gita-sahgal-leaving-amnesty-internationa/|date=13 May 2010|access-date=30 September 2015}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=October 2023}}


Amnesty responded that she was suspended "for not raising these issues internally". Speaking in her support were novelist ], journalist ] and others, who criticised Amnesty for the affiliation. Begg disputed her claims of his ]i connections and said that he did not consider anyone a terrorist who had not been convicted of terrorism.<ref name="kerbaj"/>
==Family and education==
]]]
Sahgal is originally from ], and now lives in England.


Sahgal left Amnesty International on 9 April 2010.<ref name="timesonline1">{{cite news |last=Bird |first=Steve |date=13 April 2010 |title=Gita Sahgal, who criticised Amnesty's 'pro-jihadi' links, leaves job |work=The Times |location=London |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7095732.ece |access-date=12 April 2010}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
She is the daughter of novelist ]. She is also the great-niece of former Indian Prime Minister ], and the grandaughter of his sister ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newsofap.com/newsofap-5470-25-amnesty-suspends-nehru-kin-gita-sahgal-newsofap.html |title=Amnesty suspends Nehru kin Gita Sahgal – NewsofAP.com – Andhra Pradesh News, Andhra News ,Andhra Pradesh, Telugu News |publisher=NewsofAP.com |date= |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Hasan Suroor |url=http://beta.thehindu.com/news/international/article103279.ece |title=The Hindu : News / International : Amnesty in row over “collaborating” with pro-jehadis |publisher=Beta.thehindu.com |date=9 February 2010 |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref>


==Early life and education==
Schooled first in India, she then graduated from London’s ].<ref name="up">{{cite news|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264315|title=It’s Very Human To Disagree; She feels the rip of Amnesty International’s barbs for speaking up; Neelima Shah on Gita Sahgal|last=Shah|first=Neelima|date=19 February 2010|work=Outlook|accessdate=21 February 2010}}</ref>
]]]
Gita Sahgal was born in India, the daughter of the novelist ]. She was raised as a ], and says she is now an ].<ref name="dd"/> She is a great-niece of former Indian Prime Minister ], and the granddaughter of his sister ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newsofap.com/newsofap-5470-25-amnesty-suspends-nehru-kin-gita-sahgal-newsofap.html |title=Amnesty suspends Nehru kin Gita Sahgal – NewsofAP.com – Andhra Pradesh News, Andhra News, Andhra Pradesh, Telugu News |publisher=NewsofAP.com |accessdate=4 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714174738/http://www.newsofap.com/newsofap-5470-25-amnesty-suspends-nehru-kin-gita-sahgal-newsofap.html |archive-date=14 July 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> Schooled first in India, she moved to England in 1972, where she attended and graduated from the ] in London.<ref name="up">{{cite news |last=Shah |first=Neelima |date=19 February 2010 |title=It's Very Human To Disagree; She feels the rip of Amnesty International's barbs for speaking up; Neelima Shah on Gita Sahgal |work=Outlook |url=http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264315 |url-status=dead |accessdate=21 February 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100224005126/http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264315 |archive-date=2010-02-24}}</ref> She returned to India in 1977, and began working in the civil rights movement. She moved back to England in 1983.<ref name="dd"/>


==Career== ==Career==


===Women's organizations=== ===Activism===
====Women's organisations====
She co-founded in 1979 and has been an active member of ], a non-profit organisation based in Southall, West London, that has worked against ] and bigotry.<ref name="up"/><ref name="fund"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.southallblacksisters.org.uk/ |title="Who Are SBS?", Southall Black Sisters, accessed 28 February 2010 |publisher=Southallblacksisters.org.uk |date= |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> She also co-founded in 1989 and has actively participated with Women against Fundamentalism, which was formed to challenge the rise of fundamentalism in all religions.<ref name="up"/><ref name="fund"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.womenagainstfundamentalism.org.uk/ |title="Who We Are", Women Against Fundamentalism, accessed 28 February 2010 |publisher=Womenagainstfundamentalism.org.uk |date= |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
In 1979 she co-founded ], a non-profit organisation based in Southall, West London.<ref name="up"/><ref name="dd"/><ref name="fund"/><ref>{{Cite web |title=Who we are |url=https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/who-we-are/ |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=Southall Black Sisters |language=en-US}}</ref>


In 1989 she co-founded and has participated with Women against Fundamentalism.<ref name="dd"/> It has criticised Great Britain for protecting only Christianity and its ]s. She believes this exclusion of protection for immigrant religions contributes to the growth of ] and immigrants' turning towards ].<ref name="dd"/>
===Writing===
Among her various writings, in 1992, she contributed to and co-edited '''' with Nira Yuval-Davis.


=== Film producer=== ====War rape====
Commenting on the use of ], Sahgal said in 2004 that such assaults are not typically a means of taking women as "spoils of war" or meeting sexual needs. She said rape is used intentionally as a way to disrupt the conquered society and to increase the territory of the conquering ethnic group via impregnating the conquered women.<ref>{{cite news |last=Smith-Spark |first=Laura |date=8 December 2004 |title=In Depth &#124; How did rape become a weapon of war? |publisher=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/in_depth/4078677.stm |url-status=dead |accessdate=4 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100922092612/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4078677.stm |archive-date=2010-09-22}}</ref>
In 2002 she was the producer of "Tying the Knot". The film was commissioned by the U.K.'s ]'s Community Liaison Unit, which was set up to handle the problem of British victims of ] who have been, or may be, taken abroad to marry against their will. Sahgal said that while she was not against ], she was against those that involve "pressure, emotional blackmail, the massive physical pressure of beatings and abduction".<ref>]'', 11 March 2002, accessed 21 February 2010]</ref> The educational video on marriage and freedom of choice was produced for use in schools, youth groups, and other organisations working with young people, examines marriage across various cultures, and was designed to promote discussion on the issues it raises.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-1583658/Baroness-Amos-launches-Tying-the.html |title="Baroness Amos launches '&#39;Tying the Knot'&#39;, an educational video on marriage and freedom of choice," '&#39;M2 Presswire'&#39;, 11 March 2002, accessed 16 February, 2010 |publisher=Goliath.ecnext.com |date=11 March 2002 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>


====Prostitution and peacekeeping efforts====
She also made a film for ''Despatches'', one of ]’s main investigative documentary programs, on the subject of ], a ]i woman brought to the UK by ] who was abused by her husband, set him on fire when he was drunk and asleep—killing him, and won the subsequent legal battle for her freedom.<ref>{{cite web|author=The Thin Edge – Ruchir Joshi |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070610/asp/opinion/story_7900361.asp |title=Joshi, Ruchir, " Unprovoked-A historic moment swallowed by the box office," '&#39;The Telegraph'&#39;, 10 June 2007, accessed 16 February 2010 |publisher=Telegraphindia.com |date=10 June 2007 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
Sahgal spoke out in 2004 regarding the increase of prostitution and ] associated with ] forces. She observed: "The issue with the UN is that ]s unfortunately seem to be doing the same thing that other militaries do. Even the guardians have to be guarded."<ref>{{Cite news |title=Sex charges haunt UN forces |work=] |url=https://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1126/p06s02-wogi.html |url-status=live |access-date=16 February 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101121105533/https://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1126/p06s02-wogi.html |archive-date=2010-11-21 |issn=0882-7729}}</ref>


====Invasion of Iraq; Views on Guantanamo Bay====
===Rape===
Sahgal, who was against the United States and allies' invasion of Iraq, also condemned the extrajudicial detention and torture of Muslim men at ].<ref name="dd"/><ref name="scot">{{cite news |last=Pratt |first=David |date=11 February 2010 |title=The right-on are wrong to champion so-called victims |work=] |url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/guest-commentary/the-right-on-are-wrong-to-champion-so-called-victims-1.1005798 |url-status=dead |accessdate=2 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131106004942/http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/guest-commentary/the-right-on-are-wrong-to-champion-so-called-victims-1.1005798 |archive-date=2013-11-06}}</ref> She told ], a British citizen and former Guantanamo Bay detainee, that she was "horrified and appalled" by the treatment he and other detainees received.<ref name="scot"/>{{better source needed|reason=op-ed quoting from unknown source|date=October 2023}}
In her early years in ], Sahgal was part of a ] network that fought against rape and ] laws.<ref name="fund">{{cite news|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_a-fundamental-question-for-human-rights-groups_1350522|title=A fundamental question for human rights groups|last=Nair|first=Malini|date=21 February 2010|work=Daily News & Review|accessdate=1 March 2010}}</ref>


====Secularism====
Commenting on the use of ], Sahgal said in 2004 that it is a mistake to think such assaults are primarily about "spoils of war" or sexual gratification. She said rape is often used in ethnic conflicts as a way for attackers to perpetuate social control and redraw ethnic boundaries. "Women are seen as the reproducers and carers of the community," she said.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/in_depth/4078677.stm |title=In Depth &#124; How did rape become a weapon of war? |publisher=BBC News |date=8 December 2004 |accessdate=4 March 2010}}</ref>
] and Gita Sahgal (right) deliver the Freethinkers' Declaration at the International Conference on Freedom of Conscience and Expression in London 2017]]
Gita Sahgal is the ] of the Centre for Secular Space<ref>{{cite web |title='Team', Centre for Secular Space |url=http://www.centreforsecularspace.org/about-us/team/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20131219153325/http://www.centreforsecularspace.org/about-us/team/ |archive-date=19 December 2013 |accessdate=12 March 2015 |publisher=centreforsecularspace.org}}</ref> and an honorary associate of the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gita Sahgal |url=http://www.secularism.org.uk/gita-sahgal.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924100026/http://www.secularism.org.uk/gita-sahgal.html |archive-date=2015-09-24 |accessdate=12 March 2015 |website=] |publisher=}}</ref>


===Prostitution and peacekeeping efforts=== ===Writing and film producer===
Among her various writings, in 1992, she contributed to and co-edited ''Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain'' with ].
Sahgal spoke out in 2004 with regard to the fact that prostitution and ] crops up wherever ] efforts are set up. She observed: "The issue with the ] is that ]s unfortunately seem to be doing the same thing that other militaries do. Even the guardians have to be guarded."<ref>]'', 26 November 2004, accessed 16 February 2010]</ref>


In 2002 she produced ''Tying the Knot.'' The film was commissioned by the U.K.'s ]'s Community Liaison Unit, set up to handle the problem of British victims of ] who have been, or may be, taken abroad to marry against their will. Sahgal said she was not opposed to ]s unless the persons involved were abducted or subjected to physical or emotional abuse.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2002-03-11 |title=Video on 'forced marriages' sent to schools |language=en-GB |work=] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/uk/newsid_1866000/1866717.stm |access-date=21 February 2010}}</ref>
===Detention and torture of Muslim men ===
Sahgal vociferously condemned the detention and torture of Muslim men at ].<ref name="scot">{{cite news|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/guest-commentary/the-right-on-are-wrong-to-champion-so-called-victims-1.1005798|title=The right-on are wrong to champion so-called victims|date=11 February 2010|work=]|accessdate=2 March 2010}}</ref> She told Moazzam Begg, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, that she is “horrified and appalled” by the treatment of people like him.<ref name="scot"/>


Saghal also made ''Unprovoked'', a film about the case of ], for ]'s '']'' documentary series. Ahluwalia was a ]i woman brought to the UK for an arranged marriage who was repeatedly abused by her husband. To survive, she killed him, setting him on fire while he was drunk and asleep.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ruchir Joshi |date=10 June 2007 |title='Unprovoked'-A historic moment swallowed by the box office |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070610/asp/opinion/story_7900361.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130204120855/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070610/asp/opinion/story_7900361.asp |archive-date=4 February 2013 |accessdate=16 February 2010 |work=] |location=Calcutta}}</ref>
==Amnesty International controversy; Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners==
===Sahgal quote and suspension===
]]]
She came to wide public attention in February 2010, when she was suspended by Amnesty International as head of the organisation's Gender Unit, after she was quoted by ''The Sunday Times'' in an article about Amnesty, criticizing Amnesty for its high-profile associations with ], the director of a campaign group called ].<ref name="kerbaj">{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7017810.ece|title=Amnesty International is ‘damaged’ by Taliban link; An official at the human rights charity deplores its work with a ‘jihadist’|last=Kerbaj|first=Richard|date=7 February 2010|work=The Sunday Times|accessdate=2 March 2010}}</ref><ref>]'', 9 February 2010, accessed 11 February 2010]</ref>


In addition, Sahgal produced the British documentary film ''The War Crimes File'', about atrocities committed during the ] of 1971.<ref name="dd"/>
She said: <blockquote>To be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the ] , whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment.<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref name="aar">{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/david_aaronovitch/article7019817.ece|title=How Amnesty chose the wrong poster-boy; Collaboration with Moazzam Begg, an extremist who has supported jihadi movements, looks like a serious mistake|last=Aaronovitch|first=David|date=9 February 2010|work=The Times|accessdate=2 March 2010}}</ref></blockquote> Sahgal argued that by associating itself with Begg and Cageprisoners, Amnesty is risking its reputation on ].<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249649/Amnesty-turmoil-suspending-chief-attacked-groups-links-Muslim-jihadists.html |title="Amnesty chief suspended after attacking group's links to 'Britain's most famous Taliban supporter'", Daily Mail, 9 February 2010, accessed 10 February 2010 |publisher=Dailymail.co.uk |date=9 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/martinbright/5759197/gita-sahgal-a-statement.thtml |title=Bright, Martin, "Gita Sahgal: A Statement", '&#39;Spectator'&#39;, 7 February 2010, accessed 10 February 2010 |publisher=Spectator.co.uk |date=7 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref><ref>]'', 11 February 2010, accessed 11 February 2010]</ref> "As a former Guantanamo detainee, it was legitimate to hear his experiences, but as a supporter of the Taliban it was absolutely wrong to legitimise him as a partner,” Sahgal said.<ref name="kerbaj"/><br /><br />
Begg spent time at a '']'' training camp in Afghanistan in 1993, where the camp's leader told him: “To me ''jihad'' is a drug I’m allowed to take and I always come back for more ... As long as Muslim lands are occupied, I have vowed to fight for their liberation”.<ref name="aar"/> Begg wrote in 2006 that his time at the training camp: <blockquote>was a life-changing experience for me.... I had met men who seemed to me exemplary in their faith and self-sacrifice, and seen a world that awed and inspired me.<ref>]'', 19 February 2010, accessed 8 February 2010]</ref><ref name="aar"/></blockquote>


==Amnesty International controversy==
In 2001, Taliban police in Afghanistan were beating women for improper dress, had fired all women in public service, had effectively abolished education for women, and were engaging in Friday stonings and amputations in applying '']'' law.<ref name="scot"/><ref name="aar"/> Begg wrote in his autobiography that in 2001 the Taliban had made "some modest progress—in social justice and upholding pure, old Islamic values forgotten in many Islamic countries".<ref name="scot"/><ref name="aar"/> He also said that the Taliban was "better than anything Afghanistan has had in 20 years".<ref name="kerbaj"/> Begg said later that it was his perception at the time, and that since then he has criticised the Taliban for human rights abuses.<ref name="scot"/><ref name="aar"/><ref>]'', 15 February 2010, accessed 28 February, 2010]</ref> Cageprisoners has championed, among others, ] member ] (linked to three of the ] bombers, the ], and the ]), ], ], ], and ].<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref name="aar"/>
]]]


===Sahgal's public criticism===
Amnesty has brought Begg (representing Cageprisoners) to a meeting at ] delivering a letter to U.K. Prime Minister ] demanding the closure of Guantanamo Bay, hosted Begg on a European tour urging countries to offer safe haven to Guantanamo detainees, and paid expenses for his attendance at its events.<ref name="kerbaj"/>
Sahgal joined the staff of Amnesty International in 2002, and became head of its gender unit the following year.<ref name="guardian1"/><ref name="dd"/> She came to public attention in February 2010, after she was quoted by '']'' in an article about Amnesty and suspended by the organization. She had criticised Amnesty for its high-profile associations with ], the director of ], representing men in extrajudicial detention.<ref name="kerbaj">{{cite news |last=Kerbaj |first=Richard |date=7 February 2010 |title=Amnesty International is 'damaged' by Taliban link; An official at the human rights charity deplores its work with a 'jihadist' |work=The Sunday Times |location=London |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7017810.ece |url-status=dead |accessdate=2 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100603031425/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7017810.ece |archive-date=2010-06-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Gupta |first=Rahila |date=2010-02-09 |title=Double standards on human rights |language=en-GB |work=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/feb/09/amnesty-sahgal-rights-row |access-date=11 February 2010 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> "To be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the ] Begg, whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment," she said.<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref name="aar">{{cite news |last=Aaronovitch |first=David |date=9 February 2010 |title=How Amnesty chose the wrong poster-boy; Collaboration with Moazzam Begg, an extremist who has supported jihadi movements, looks like a serious mistake |work=The Times |location=London |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/david_aaronovitch/article7019817.ece |url-status=dead |accessdate=2 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100526174633/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/david_aaronovitch/article7019817.ece |archive-date=2010-05-26}}</ref> Sahgal argued that by associating with Begg and Cageprisoners, Amnesty was risking its reputation on human rights.<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref>{{cite news|last=Bright|first=Martin|url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/martinbright/5759197/gita-sahgal-a-statement.thtml |title=Gita Sahgal: A Statement|work=The Spectator |date=7 February 2010 |access-date=18 March 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100316141113/http://www.spectator.co.uk/martinbright/5759197/gita-sahgal-a-statement.thtml |archive-date=16 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-02-11 |title=Joan Smith: Amnesty shouldn't support men like Moazzam Begg |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/joan-smith/joan-smith-amnesty-shouldn-t-support-men-like-moazzam-begg-1895848.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211205034850/https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/joan-smith/joan-smith-amnesty-shouldn-t-support-men-like-moazzam-begg-1895848.html |archive-date=2021-12-05 |access-date=11 February 2010 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> "As a former Guantanamo detainee, it was legitimate to hear his experiences, but as a supporter of the Taliban it was absolutely wrong to legitimise him as a partner", Sahgal said.<ref name="kerbaj"/> She said she repeatedly brought the matter up with Amnesty for two years, to no avail.<ref name="dd"/> A few hours after the article was published, Sahgal was suspended from her position.<ref name="sigstate"/> Amnesty's Senior Director of Law and Policy, Widney Brown, later said Sahgal raised concerns about Begg and Cageprisoners to her personally for the first time a few days before sharing them with ''The Sunday Times''.<ref name="dd"/>


Sahgal issued a statement saying she felt that Amnesty was risking its reputation by associating with and thereby politically legitimising Begg, because Cageprisoners "actively promotes Islamic Right ideas and individuals".<ref name="sigstate"/> She said the issue was not about Begg's "freedom of opinion, nor about his right to propound his views: he already exercises these rights fully as he should. The issue is ... the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights."<ref name="sigstate"/> The controversy prompted responses by politicians, the writer ], and journalist ], among others who criticised Amnesty's association with Begg.
'']'' published an article about Amnesty's association with groups that support the Taliban and promote "Islamic Right" ideas on 7 February 2010.<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref name="sigstate">{{cite web|title=Gita Sahgal: A Statement|last=Sahgal|first=Gita|coauthors=http://www.spectator.co.uk/martinbright/5759197/gita-sahgal-a-statement.thtml|date=7 February 2010|accessdate=17 February 2010}}</ref> Sahgal spoke to the newspaper because she felt that for two years Amnesty had ignored her concerns on the subject.<ref name="kerbaj"/> Sahgal's views on Amnesty's high-profile associations with Begg and Cageprisoners were quoted.<ref name="sigstate"/> Within a few hours of the article being published, Amnesty suspended her.<ref name="sigstate"/>


After her suspension and the controversy, Sahgal was interviewed by numerous media and attracted international supporters. She was interviewed on ] (NPR) on 27 February 2010, where she discussed the activities of Cageprisoners and why she deemed it inappropriate for Amnesty to associate with Begg.<ref name="npr">{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124156482|title=Is Amnesty International Supporting a Jihadist?|date=27 February 2010|work=All Things Considered|publisher=NPR|accessdate=28 February 2010}}</ref> She said that Cageprisoners' Asim Qureshi spoke supporting global '']'' at a ] rally.<ref name="npr"/> She noted that a best seller at Begg's bookshop was a book by ], a mentor of ] and a founder of the terrorist organization ].<ref name="dd"/><ref name="npr"/>
===Sahgal statements===
Sahgal issued a statement in which she explained further that she felt that Amnesty was risking its reputation by associating with and thereby politically legitimizing Begg, because Cageprisoners "actively promotes Islamic Right ideas and individuals".<ref name="sigstate"/> She headed off the argument that the issue was Begg's rights, by saying she has always opposed the illegal detention and torture of Muslim men, and been "horrified and appalled" by the treatment of people like Begg. But that the issue is not about Begg’s "freedom of opinion, nor about his right to propound his views: he already exercises these rights fully as he should. The issue is ... the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights."


In a separate interview for the Indian '']'', Sahgal said that, as Qureshi affirmed his support for global ''jihad'' on a'' ]'' programme, "these things could have been stated in introduction" with Amnesty.<ref>Chakraberty, Sumit, , '']'', 21 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.</ref> She said that Begg's bookshop had published ''The Army of Madinah'', which she characterised as a ''jihad'' manual by ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/world/comment_dangerous-liaisons_1372616-2 |title=Dangerous liaisons |work=Daily News and Analysis |date=18 April 2010 |accessdate=27 April 2010}}</ref>
Her statement also said in part:


===Amnesty responses===
<blockquote>
Amnesty responded on its website with a statement by its interim Secretary General, Claudio Cordone:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGNAU2010021115380&lang=e |title="Amnesty International on its work with Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners," 11 February 2010. Retrieved 11 February 2010 |publisher=Amnestyusa.org |date=11 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100224110306/http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGNAU2010021115380&lang=e |archive-date=24 February 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
:A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when a great organisation must ask: if it lies to itself, can it demand the truth of others? ... Amnesty ... has sanitized the history and politics of ... Begg and completely failed to recognize the nature of ... Cageprisoners....


{{Quote| was suspended ... for not raising these issues internally... speaks about his own views ..., not Amnesty International's... Sometimes the people whose rights we defend may not share each others views–but they all have human rights, and all human rights are worth defending.}}
:I sent two memos to my management asking a series of questions about what considerations were given to the nature of the relationship with ... Begg and ... Cageprisoners. I have received no answer.... Amnesty has created the impression that Begg is not only a victim of human rights violations, but a defender of human rights....


Widney Brown of Amnesty also spoke on the NPR program with Sahgal.<ref name="npr"/> She said the books sold at his bookstore did not mean that he was not "a legitimate voice on Guantanamo Bay abuses".<ref name="npr"/> Responding to the interviewer's observation that Amnesty had sponsored Begg's lecture tours in Europe, she said that because Begg was one of the first detainees released, he was considered important for dispelling Guantanamo Bay's secrecy.<ref name="npr"/> Brown said that, as a British citizen, Begg has "an incredibly effective voice in talking to governments in Europe about the importance of" their accepting Guantanamo detainees.<ref name="npr"/> She praised Sahgal's work, saying:<ref name="npr"/>
:I have been a human rights campaigner for over three decades, defending the rights of women and ethnic minorities, defending religious freedom and the rights of victims of torture, and campaigning against illegal detention and state repression. I have raised the issue of the association of Amnesty International with groups such as Begg’s consistently within the organisation. I have now been suspended for trying to do my job and staying faithful to Amnesty’s mission to protect and defend human rights universally and impartially.<ref name="sigstate"/></blockquote>


{{quote|There's no question about it. Gita is incredibly intelligent, very strong analysis .... She's done great work for us. And I think the real tragedy of this particular circumstance is by going public in this particular way knowing that we were addressing her issue means that she's maybe undermining her own work in fact.}}
On 27 February, she said in an interview on ] (NPR) that Amnesty had provided Begg with a platform and legitimized him as a human rights defender, while Cageprisoners promotes people who in turn promote "a violent and discriminatory agenda".<ref name="npr">{{cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124156482|title=Is Amnesty International Supporting a Jihadist?|date=27 February 2010|work=All Things Considered|publisher=NPR|accessdate=28 February 2010}}</ref> She also said that Cageprisoners' Asim Qureshi spoke supporting global '']'' at a ] rally.<ref name="npr"/> And she noted that Begg had run a bookshop, a bestseller of which was a book by ''jihad''-promotor ]—a mentor of ], and a founder of ], which has attacked civilians and been implicated in the ].<ref name="npr"/> In a separate interview, she pointed as well to Begg having attended ''jihadi'' training camps and sold books and videos promoting global ''jihad'' and terrorist attacks, to Quereshi having affirmed his support for global ''jihad'' on a'' ]'' programme, and said that "these things could have been stated in his introduction".<ref>Chakraberty, Sumit, , ], 21 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.</ref>


Amnesty's international secretariat Policy Director, Anne Fitzgerald, when asked if she thought Begg was a human rights advocate, said: "It’s something you’d have to speak to him about. I don’t have the information to answer that".<ref name="dd"/><ref name="kerbaj"/>
===Amnesty responses===
Amnesty responded on its website with a statement by its interim Secretary General, Claudio Cordone:


In April 2010, Amnesty circulated a statement internally, saying:
<blockquote> was not suspended ... for raising these issues internally... speaks about his own views ..., not Amnesty International’s... Sometimes the people whose rights we defend may not share each others views–but they all have human rights, and all human rights are worth defending.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGNAU2010021115380&lang=e |title="Amnesty International on its work with Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners," 11 February 2010, accessed 11 February 2010 |publisher=Amnestyusa.org |date=11 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref></blockquote>


{{Quote|Due to irreconcilable differences of view over policy between Gita Sahgal and Amnesty International regarding Amnesty International’s relationship with Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners, it has been agreed that Gita will leave Amnesty International on 9 April 2010.}}
Amnesty's Senior Director of International Law and Policy, Widney Brown, also spoke on the NPR program.<ref name="npr"/> She said the fact that Begg's bookstore sold "books that undermine women's rights ... books that you don't like" shouldn't undermine him as a legitimate voice on Guantanamo Bay abuses.<ref name="npr"/> Responding to the observation that Amnesty had sponsored his tours through Europe, which might be seen as more than just hearing his views, she said that because Begg was one of the first detainees released, he was able able to dispel Guantanamo Bay's secrecy.<ref name="npr"/> She added that, as a British citizen, Begg has "an incredibly effective voice in talking to governments in Europe about the importance of" their accepting Guantanamo detainees.<ref name="npr"/> As to the praiseworthiness of Sahgal's work, she said: <blockquote>There's no question about it. Gita is incredibly intelligent, very strong analysis .... She's done great work for us. And I think the real tragedy of this particular circumstance is by going public in this particular way knowing that we were addressing her issue means that she's maybe undermining her own work in fact.<ref name="npr"/></blockquote>

Also, Amnesty's Cordone said on a Canadian radio program that he thought Begg's politics are benign, and that so far there was not any evidence to suggest that Amnesty should cut its ties with him.<ref name="wsj"/> Responding to criticism from Salman Rushdie, Kate Allen, director of Amnesty UK, said it took criticism “seriously” but would continue to seek “universal respect” for human rights.<ref>]'', 21 February 2010, accessed 28 February 2010]</ref>

Amnesty’s international secretariat Policy Director, Anne Fitzgerad, when asked if she thought Begg was a human rights advocate, said: “It’s something you’d have to speak to him about. I don’t have the information to answer that.”<ref name="kerbaj"/>


===Begg response=== ===Begg response===
Begg said Sahgal's claims of ''jihadi'' connections and support for terrorism were "ridiculous."<ref name="kerbaj"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2010/02/11/Amnesty-defends-ties-to-GITMO-detainee/UPI-93921265919762/ |title="Amnesty defends ties to GITMO detainee", '&#39;UPI'&#39;, 11 February 2010, 2 March 2010 |publisher=Upi.com |date=11 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> He defended his support for the Taliban, saying: “We need to be engaging with those people who we find most unpalatable. I don’t consider anybody a terrorist until they have been charged and convicted of terrorism.<ref name="kerbaj"/> Begg said of the Taliban: "We need to be engaging with those people who we find most unpalatable. I don’t consider anybody a terrorist until they have been charged and convicted of terrorism".<ref name="kerbaj"/>

Begg noted that he worked with groups to empower Muslim women.<ref name="guardian1"/><ref name="dd"/> Sahgal, he says, "has no monopoly on women's rights".<ref name="dd"/>


===Reactions=== ===Reactions===


;Pro-Sahgal ====Pro-Sahgal====
]]] ]]]
], who was championed by Amnesty after Iran placed a ] on him for writing '']'', said: <blockquote>Amnesty ... has done its reputation incalculable damage by allying itself with Moazzam Begg and his group Cageprisoners, and holding them up as human rights advocates. It looks very much as if Amnesty's leadership is suffering from a kind of moral bankruptcy, and has lost the ability to distinguish right from wrong. It has greatly compounded its error by suspending the redoubtable Gita Sahgal for the crime of going public with her concerns. Gita Sahgal is a woman of immense integrity and distinction.... It is people like Gita Sahgal who are the true voices of the human rights movement; Amnesty and Begg have revealed, by their statements and actions, that they deserve our contempt.<ref>, ''The Sunday Times'', 21 February 2010</ref><ref>, '']'', 22 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.</ref></blockquote> ] said:<ref>, ''The Sunday Times'', 21 February 2010</ref><ref>, '']'', 22 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.</ref>


{{Quote|Amnesty ... has done its reputation incalculable damage by allying itself with Moazzam Begg and his group Cageprisoners, and holding them up as human rights advocates. It looks very much as if Amnesty's leadership is suffering from a kind of moral bankruptcy, and has lost the ability to distinguish right from wrong. It has greatly compounded its error by suspending the redoubtable Gita Sahgal for the crime of going public with her concerns. Gita Sahgal is a woman of immense integrity and distinction.... It is people like Gita Sahgal who are the true voices of the human rights movement; Amnesty and Begg have revealed, by their statements and actions, that they deserve our contempt.}}
], a Member of the ], wrote Amnesty protesting its suspension of Gita Sahgal: "one of its most respected researchers because she rightly called into question Amnesty’s endorsement of Mozzam Begg whose views on the Taliban and on Islamist jihad stand in total contradiction of everything Amnesty has fought for."<ref name="denis">{{cite web|url=http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/spip.php?article11|title=Letter To Amnesty International from |last=MacShane, Member of British Parliament |first=Denis |date=10 February 2010|accessdate=17 February 2010}}</ref> He called "]" the fact that Amnesty—"the very organisation meant to defend human rights"—would threaten the career of Sahgal for her having exposed "an ideology that denies human rights".<ref name="denis"/>


], a Member of the ] and former Labour government minister, wrote to Amnesty protesting its suspension of Gita Sahgal: "one of its most respected researchers because she rightly called into question Amnesty’s endorsement of Mozzam Begg whose views on the Taliban and on Islamist jihad stand in total contradiction of everything Amnesty has fought for."<ref name="denis">{{cite web|url=http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/spip.php?article11|title=Letter To Amnesty International from|last=MacShane, Member of British Parliament|first=Denis|date=10 February 2010|accessdate=17 February 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100216011402/http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/spip.php?article11|archive-date=16 February 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> He called "]" the fact that Amnesty—"the very organisation meant to defend human rights"—would threaten the career of Sahgal for her having exposed "an ideology that denies human rights".<ref name="denis"/>
Writing in The '']'', writer ] said "It's well-nigh incredible that Amnesty should give a platform to people who are shady on this question and absolutely disgraceful that it should suspend a renowned employee who gave voice to her deep and sincere misgivings," writing in '']'', journalist and human rights activist ] said "Amnesty's mistake is simple and egregious", and writing in '']'' journalist ] said: "It is Gita Sahgal who should be the darling of the human rights establishment, not Moazzam Begg," and columnist ] wrote "her real crime has been to expose the extraordinary sympathy by white ‘liberals’, committed to ‘human rights’, for Islamic jihadists—who are committed to the extinction of human rights."<ref name="mel">{{cite news|url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/5774326/the-human-wrongs-industry-spits-out-one-of-its-own.thtml|title=The human wrongs industry spits out one of its own|last=Phillips|first=Melanie|date=14 February 2010|work=The Spectator|accessdate=23 February 2010}}</ref><ref>]'', 11 February 2010, accessed 17 February 2010]</ref><ref>]'', 17 February 2010, accessed 17 February 2010]</ref><ref>]'', 7 February 2010]</ref> '']'' (not connected to ''The Sunday Times'') wrote: "In an extraordinary inversion of its traditional role, Amnesty has stifled its own still small voice of conscience," and journalist ] wrote in '']'' "Amnesty is living in the make-believe world ... where it thinks that liberals are free to form alliances with defenders of clerical fascists who want to do everything in their power to suppress liberals, most notably liberal-minded Muslims."<ref>]'', 12 February 2010, accessed 17 February 2010]</ref><ref>]'', 14 February 2010, 17 February 2010]</ref> Writer Michael Weiss opined in '']'' that Sahgal had correctly characterized Begg, whom Weiss said has written favorably about the Taliban, and journalist ] wrote in '']'': "It was a gutsy stand, given the dread of political correctness that cripples our thought and makes us bend over backwards till we almost topple over. ... Suspending Sahgal was an illiberal knee-jerk response unbecoming of this cherished human rights organisation."<ref name="wsj">{{cite news|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704454304575081331766664948.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines|title=Amnesty International and the Taliban; A staffer dissents from celebrating a terror spokesman, and is suspended.|last=Weiss|first=Michael|date=26 February 2010|work=The Wall Street Journal|accessdate=1 March 2010}}</ref> ] wrote in her support, in '']'', as did '']'', columnist and author ] in Australia's '']'', commentator Jonathan Power in Dubai's '']'', journalist and author ] in the ''National Post'', columnist Rod Liddle in ''The Spectator'', columnist ] in '']'', and ] in a column in '']'' entitled "How Amnesty Chose the Wrong Poster-boy".<ref>]'', 20 February 2010, accessed 21 February 2010]</ref><ref name="scot"/><ref>]'', 1 March 2010, accessed 2 March 2010]</ref><ref>]'', 28 February 2010, accessed 28 February 2010]</ref><ref>]'', 8 February 2010, accessed 2 March 2010]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2010/02/08/392897.aspx |title=Glavin, Terry, "Terry Glavin: Amnesty International doubles down on appeasement; This has been going on for far too long. Now it's gone too far," '&#39;National Post'&#39;, 8 February 2010, 2 March 2010 |publisher=Network.nationalpost.com |date= |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref><ref name="aar"/> Feminist historian ] also spoke up in her support.<ref name="fund"/>


Writing in The '']'', writer ] said "It's well-nigh incredible that Amnesty should give a platform to people who are shady on this question and absolutely disgraceful that it should suspend a renowned employee who gave voice to her deep and sincere misgivings," writing in '']'', journalist and human rights activist ] said "Amnesty's mistake is simple and egregious", and writing in '']'', journalist ] commented: "It is Gita Sahgal who should be the darling of the human rights establishment, not Moazzam Begg," and columnist ] wrote "her real crime has been to expose the extraordinary sympathy by white 'liberals', committed to 'human rights', for Islamic jihadists—who are committed to the extinction of human rights."<ref name="mel">{{cite news |url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/5774326/the-human-wrongs-industry-spits-out-one-of-its-own.thtml |title=The human wrongs industry spits out one of its own |last=Phillips |first=Melanie |date=14 February 2010 |work=The Spectator |accessdate=23 February 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100217033604/http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/5774326/the-human-wrongs-industry-spits-out-one-of-its-own.thtml |archivedate=17 February 2010}}</ref><ref>Smith, Joan , '']'', 11 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2010/02/17/christopher-hitchens-amnesty-international-s-suspension-of-conscience.aspx# |title=Hitchens, Christopher, "Christopher Hitchens: Amnesty International's suspension of conscience", The National Post |access-date=18 February 2010}}{{dead link|date=January 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>, '']'', 7 February 2010 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100211120857/http://www.spectator.co.uk/martinbright/5757557/amnesty-international-moazzam-begg-and-the-bravery-of-gita-sahgal.thtml |date=11 February 2010 }}</ref> '']'' wrote: "In an extraordinary inversion of its traditional role, Amnesty has stifled its own still small voice of conscience," and journalist ] wrote in '']'' "Amnesty is living in the make-believe world ... where it thinks that liberals are free to form alliances with defenders of clerical fascists who want to do everything in their power to suppress liberals, most notably liberal-minded Muslims."<ref> '']'', 12 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010</ref><ref> '']'', 14 February 2010, 17 February 2010</ref> ] wrote in '']'': "It was a gutsy stand, given the dread of political correctness that cripples our thought and makes us bend over backwards till we almost topple over.&nbsp;... Suspending Sahgal was an illiberal knee-jerk response unbecoming of this cherished human rights organisation."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-amnesty-s-illiberal-knee-jerk-response-1352165|title=Amnesty's illiberal knee-jerk response|last=Sen|first=Antara Dev|date=25 February 2010|work=]|accessdate=10 October 2015}}</ref> ] wrote in her support, in '']'', as did '']'', columnist and author ] in Australia's '']'', commentator Jonathan Power in Dubai's '']'', journalist and author ] in the ''National Post'', ''Spectator'' contributor ], columnist ] in '']'', and ] in a column in '']'' entitled "How Amnesty Chose the Wrong Poster-boy".<ref name="scot"/><ref name="aar"/><ref> '']'', 20 February 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2010</ref><ref>{{Dead link|date=November 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, '']'', 1 March 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010</ref><ref>, '']'', 28 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010</ref><ref>Liddle, Rod , '']'', 8 February 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305223519/http://www.spectator.co.uk/rodliddle/5759708/why-give-money-to-charity-when-they-shaft-what-they-purport-to-defend.thtml |date=5 March 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2010/02/08/392897.aspx |title=Glavin, Terry, "Terry Glavin: Amnesty International doubles down on appeasement; This has been going on for far too long. Now it's gone too far," ''National Post'', 8 February 2010, 2 March 2010 |work=National Post |accessdate=18 March 2010 }}{{dead link|date=January 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Feminist historian ] also spoke up in her support.<ref name="fund">{{cite news|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_a-fundamental-question-for-human-rights-groups_1350522|title=A fundamental question for human rights groups|last=Nair|first=Malini|date=21 February 2010|work=Daily News & Review|accessdate=1 March 2010}}</ref> ] wrote in '']'' that "Amnesty is no longer an organisation worth listening to, let alone supporting", and '']'' wrote: "it's a pity that a group that was born to give voice to the victims of oppression should now devote itself to sanitizing the oppressors".<ref>{{cite news|last=Murray |first=Douglas |url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/douglasmurray/100034138/if-you-support-amnesty-international-stop/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100421022403/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/douglasmurray/100034138/if-you-support-amnesty-international-stop/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=21 April 2010 |title=If you support Amnesty International – STOP – Telegraph Blogs |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=14 April 2010 |accessdate=27 April 2010 | location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303720604575169414119507770?mod=googlenews_wsj |title=Amnesty International and Jihad |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=14 April 2010 |accessdate=27 April 2010}}</ref>
]]]
Sahgal's mother, Nehru’s niece novelist Nayantara Sahgal, said she was proud of Gita:


] ]]
<blockquote>for her very correct and courageous stand. Gita had been taking up the matter for a couple of years now, but after not having received a response she decided to go public—which was a very brave thing to do.... Amnesty has been supporting Begg, legitimising him, making him a partner and sponsoring his tour of Europe. They should at least have checked his credentials. It simply gives them a bad reputation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ties-with-taliban-supporter-a-damage-to-amnesty-reputation-says-nehru-kin/580564/0 |title=Roy, Esha, "Ties with Taliban supporter a damage to Amnesty reputation, says Nehru kin", '&#39;Indian Express'&#39;, 17 February 2010, accessed 15 February 2010 |publisher=Indianexpress.com |date=17 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref></blockquote>


Sahgal's mother, Nehru's niece novelist Nayantara Sahgal, said she was proud of Gita:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ties-with-taliban-supporter-a-damage-to-amnesty-reputation-says-nehru-kin/580564/0 |title=Roy, Esha, "Ties with Taliban supporter a damage to Amnesty reputation, says Nehru kin", ''Indian Express'', 17 February 2010. Retrieved 15 February 2010 |work=The Indian Express |date=17 February 2010 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
An organization called ''Human rights for All'' formed in her defense.<ref> website.</ref>


{{Quote|for her very correct and courageous stand. Gita had been taking up the matter for a couple of years now, but after not having received a response she decided to go public—which was a very brave thing to do.... Amnesty has been supporting Begg, legitimising him, making him a partner and sponsoring his tour of Europe. They should at least have checked his credentials. It simply gives them a bad reputation.}}
;Mixed
Leaked extracts from an internal 10 February 2010, memo by Amnesty’s Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi, which echoed some of the concerns raised by Sahgal, were published by ''The Sunday Times''.<ref>{{dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> In the memo he said Amnesty should publicly admit its mistake in not establishing sufficiently publicly that it does not support all or even many of Begg's views. Zarifi said Amnesty "did not always sufficiently distinguish between the rights of detainees to be free from torture, and the validity of their views", adding that the organization "did not always clarify that while we champion the rights of all—including terrorism suspects, and more important, victims of terrorism—we do not champion their views”.<ref>]'', 15 February 2010, accessed 15 February 2010]</ref> In a subsequent letter to ''The Sunday Times'', while Zarifi did not retract any of the above, he said he fully agreed with the measures Amnesty took in response to Sahgal sharing her views publicly.<ref>]'', 21 February 2010, accessed 21 February 2010]</ref>


An organisation called Human rights for All formed in her defence.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Human Rights For All |url=http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726161817/http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/ |archive-date=2011-07-26 |website=Human Rights For All}}</ref> They have been joined by many notable supporters.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120802100622/http://www.human-rights-for-all.org/spip.php?article44 |date=2 August 2012 }}, ''Human Rights for All'', 22 March 2010</ref>
;Pro-Begg

]]]
'']'' wrote in April 2010 that Amnesty had faced few stickier periods since it was founded in 1961, and Oliver Kamm wrote in ''The Times'' that Amnesty had shown a "grudging and euphemistic explanation for its behaviour" and that "Disastrously for itself and those who depend on its support, Amnesty is no longer the friend of liberty".<ref name="guardian1"/>
Author, former journalist, and Muslim convert ] (who coincidentally was invited, along with Begg and Qureshi, to speak at ] in 2007 by Christmas Day bomber ]) said Begg was being “demonised”, and that he was “a great supporter of women and a promoter of their rights”.<ref name="aar"/>

====Mixed====
Leaked extracts from an internal 10 February 2010 memo by Amnesty's Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi, were published by ''The Sunday Times''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article7026277.ece |last=Kerbaj |first=Richard |title=Second Amnesty chief attacks Islamist links |work=The Times |date=14 February 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110510012742/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article7026277.ece |archivedate=10 May 2011 |accessdate=30 September 2015}}</ref> In the memo Zarifi said Amnesty had made a mistake in not making it clearer they did not support Begg's views. Zarifi said Amnesty "did not always sufficiently distinguish between the rights of detainees to be free from torture, and the validity of their views", adding that the organisation "did not always clarify that while we champion the rights of all—including terrorism suspects, and more important, victims of terrorism—we do not champion their views".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Suroor |first=Hasan |date=15 February 2010 |title=Another Amnesty official questions its links with jihadi group |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article106657.ece |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120914172516/http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article106657.ece |archive-date=2012-09-14 |access-date=15 February 2010 |website=]}}</ref> In a subsequent letter to ''The Sunday Times'', Zarifi said he agreed with Amnesty's actions with regard to Sahgal.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article7035170.ece |title=Amnesty misconception |work=] |date=21 February 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604220009/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article7035170.ece |archivedate=4 June 2011 |accessdate=30 September 2015}}</ref>

Amnesty decided not to hire Begg for their South Asia campaigns,<ref name="dd"/> Widney Brown said: "Sam's view was that, no, he was not the right person for . He raised the concern, and he was heard".<ref name="dd"/>

====Pro-Begg====
]]]
], a British journalist for Iranian-based English language news channel ] and a Cageprisoners patron, said Begg was being "demonised", and that he was "a great supporter of women and a promoter of their rights".<ref name="aar"/><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Burkeman |first1=Oliver |last2=Pidd |first2=Helen |last3=Tait |first3=Robert |date=2007-07-03 |title='An antidote to Fox': Iran launches English TV channel |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jul/03/iran.television |access-date=2023-10-18 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref name="cp31190">{{cite web |last=Ridley |first=Yvonne |date=28 March 2010 |title=Milestones Remembered: Yvonne Ridley |url=http://old.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=31190 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105225159/http://old.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=31190 |archivedate=5 November 2013 |accessdate=27 April 2010 |website=] |publisher=}}</ref>

Co-author of '']'', ] wrote: "Ms Sahgal has contributed to the current climate of intolerance and islamophobia in Britain."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Brittain |first=Victoria |date=30 June 2010 |title=Dangerous game: a reply to Gita Sahgal and her supporters |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dangerous-game-reply-to-gita-sahgal-and-her-supporters/ |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>

], critic of Guantanamo Bay detention camp, and friend of Begg, also cited Islamophobia, and then defended Begg. He said, "I know from personal experience that Moazzam Begg is no extremist. We have met on numerous occasions, have had several long discussions, and have shared platforms together at many events."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Worthington |first=Andy |date=2010-02-10 |title=Defending Moazzam Begg and Amnesty International |url=https://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/02/10/defending-moazzam-begg-and-amnesty-international/ |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=]}}</ref>


==Select writings== ==Select writings==

===Book=== ===Book===
*'''', co-editor with Nira Yuval-Davis, and contributor, ] (1992), WLUML (2002), ISBN 1853812196 *'''', co-editor with Nira Yuval-Davis, and contributor, ] (1992), WLUML (2002), {{ISBN|1-85381-219-6}}


===Chapters=== ===Chapters===
*, Sheila Rowbotham, Huw Beynon, "Chapter: Struggle Not Submission", Rivers Oram Press, 2001, ISBN 1854891219 *, Sheila Rowbotham, ], "Chapter: Struggle Not Submission", Rivers Oram Press, 2001, {{ISBN|1-85489-121-9}}
*, Reina Lewis, Sara Mills, Chapter: "The Uses of Fundamentalism", with Nira Yuval-Davis, Taylor & Francis, 2003, ISBN 0415942756 *, Reina Lewis, Sara Mills, Chapter: "The Uses of Fundamentalism", with Nira Yuval-Davis, Taylor & Francis, 2003, {{ISBN|0-415-94275-6}}
*, Nira Yuval-Davis, Kalpana Kannabirān, Ulrike Vieten, "Chapter: Legislating Utopia? Violence Against Women: Identities and Interventions," SAGE, 2006, ISBN Ch1412921015 *, Nira Yuval-Davis, Kalpana Kannabirān, Ulrike Vieten, "Chapter: Legislating Utopia? Violence Against Women: Identities and Interventions," SAGE, 2006, ISBN Ch1412921015


==Notes== ==See also==
* ]
{{reflist|2}}
* ]
* ]

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
*, 7 February 2010 *, 7 February 2010
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727211728/http://human-rights-for-all.org/ |date=27 July 2020 }}
*, Gita Sahgal, ''DNA India'', 18 April 2010
*, ], '']'', 9 February 2010

*], Member of ]], 10 February 2010
{{Portal bar|Biography|India|Literature|Journalism|Feminism}}

{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Sahgal, Gita}}
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 03:35, 24 October 2024

Indian writer and journalist (born 1956 or 1957)

Gita Sahgal
Sahgal speaking in London, July 2017
Born1956 or 1957 (age 67–68)
Bombay, Bombay State, India
CitizenshipUnited Kingdom
Alma materSchool of Oriental and African Studies
Occupations
ParentNayantara Sahgal (mother)
RelativesVijaya Lakshmi Pandit (grandmother)
Jawaharlal Nehru (great uncle)

Gita Sahgal (born 1956 or 1957) is a British writer, journalist, film director, women rights activist and human rights activist, whose work focusses on the issues of feminism, fundamentalism and racism.

She has been a co-founder and active member of women's organisations. She has also been head of Amnesty International's Gender Unit, and has opposed the oppression of women in particular by religious fundamentalists.

In February 2010, she was suspended by Amnesty as head of its Gender Unit after she was quoted by The Sunday Times criticising Amnesty for its high-profile associations with Moazzam Begg, director of the campaign group Cage (formerly Cageprisoners), that represents men detained at Guantanamo under extrajudicial conditions. She referred to him as "Britain's most famous supporter of the Taliban".

Amnesty responded that she was suspended "for not raising these issues internally". Speaking in her support were novelist Salman Rushdie, journalist Christopher Hitchens and others, who criticised Amnesty for the affiliation. Begg disputed her claims of his jihadi connections and said that he did not consider anyone a terrorist who had not been convicted of terrorism.

Sahgal left Amnesty International on 9 April 2010.

Early life and education

Sahgal's great-uncle, former Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru

Gita Sahgal was born in India, the daughter of the novelist Nayantara Sahgal. She was raised as a Hindu, and says she is now an atheist. She is a great-niece of former Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, and the granddaughter of his sister Vijayalakshmi Pandit. Schooled first in India, she moved to England in 1972, where she attended and graduated from the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. She returned to India in 1977, and began working in the civil rights movement. She moved back to England in 1983.

Career

Activism

Women's organisations

In 1979 she co-founded Southall Black Sisters, a non-profit organisation based in Southall, West London.

In 1989 she co-founded and has participated with Women against Fundamentalism. It has criticised Great Britain for protecting only Christianity and its blasphemy laws. She believes this exclusion of protection for immigrant religions contributes to the growth of sectarianism and immigrants' turning towards religious fundamentalism.

War rape

Commenting on the use of rape in ethnic conflicts, Sahgal said in 2004 that such assaults are not typically a means of taking women as "spoils of war" or meeting sexual needs. She said rape is used intentionally as a way to disrupt the conquered society and to increase the territory of the conquering ethnic group via impregnating the conquered women.

Prostitution and peacekeeping efforts

Sahgal spoke out in 2004 regarding the increase of prostitution and sex abuse associated with humanitarian intervention forces. She observed: "The issue with the UN is that peacekeeping operations unfortunately seem to be doing the same thing that other militaries do. Even the guardians have to be guarded."

Invasion of Iraq; Views on Guantanamo Bay

Sahgal, who was against the United States and allies' invasion of Iraq, also condemned the extrajudicial detention and torture of Muslim men at Guantanamo Bay. She told Moazzam Begg, a British citizen and former Guantanamo Bay detainee, that she was "horrified and appalled" by the treatment he and other detainees received.

Secularism

Maryam Namazie and Gita Sahgal (right) deliver the Freethinkers' Declaration at the International Conference on Freedom of Conscience and Expression in London 2017

Gita Sahgal is the executive director of the Centre for Secular Space and an honorary associate of the National Secular Society.

Writing and film producer

Among her various writings, in 1992, she contributed to and co-edited Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain with Nira Yuval-Davis.

In 2002 she produced Tying the Knot. The film was commissioned by the U.K.'s Foreign and Commonwealth Office's Community Liaison Unit, set up to handle the problem of British victims of forced marriage who have been, or may be, taken abroad to marry against their will. Sahgal said she was not opposed to arranged marriages unless the persons involved were abducted or subjected to physical or emotional abuse.

Saghal also made Unprovoked, a film about the case of Kiranjit Ahluwalia, for Channel 4's Dispatches documentary series. Ahluwalia was a Punjabi woman brought to the UK for an arranged marriage who was repeatedly abused by her husband. To survive, she killed him, setting him on fire while he was drunk and asleep.

In addition, Sahgal produced the British documentary film The War Crimes File, about atrocities committed during the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971.

Amnesty International controversy

Moazzam Begg

Sahgal's public criticism

Sahgal joined the staff of Amnesty International in 2002, and became head of its gender unit the following year. She came to public attention in February 2010, after she was quoted by The Sunday Times in an article about Amnesty and suspended by the organization. She had criticised Amnesty for its high-profile associations with Moazzam Begg, the director of Cageprisoners, representing men in extrajudicial detention. "To be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the Taliban Begg, whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment," she said. Sahgal argued that by associating with Begg and Cageprisoners, Amnesty was risking its reputation on human rights. "As a former Guantanamo detainee, it was legitimate to hear his experiences, but as a supporter of the Taliban it was absolutely wrong to legitimise him as a partner", Sahgal said. She said she repeatedly brought the matter up with Amnesty for two years, to no avail. A few hours after the article was published, Sahgal was suspended from her position. Amnesty's Senior Director of Law and Policy, Widney Brown, later said Sahgal raised concerns about Begg and Cageprisoners to her personally for the first time a few days before sharing them with The Sunday Times.

Sahgal issued a statement saying she felt that Amnesty was risking its reputation by associating with and thereby politically legitimising Begg, because Cageprisoners "actively promotes Islamic Right ideas and individuals". She said the issue was not about Begg's "freedom of opinion, nor about his right to propound his views: he already exercises these rights fully as he should. The issue is ... the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights." The controversy prompted responses by politicians, the writer Salman Rushdie, and journalist Christopher Hitchens, among others who criticised Amnesty's association with Begg.

After her suspension and the controversy, Sahgal was interviewed by numerous media and attracted international supporters. She was interviewed on National Public Radio (NPR) on 27 February 2010, where she discussed the activities of Cageprisoners and why she deemed it inappropriate for Amnesty to associate with Begg. She said that Cageprisoners' Asim Qureshi spoke supporting global jihad at a Hizb ut-Tahrir rally. She noted that a best seller at Begg's bookshop was a book by Abdullah Azzam, a mentor of Osama bin Laden and a founder of the terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba.

In a separate interview for the Indian Daily News & Analysis, Sahgal said that, as Qureshi affirmed his support for global jihad on a BBC World Service programme, "these things could have been stated in introduction" with Amnesty. She said that Begg's bookshop had published The Army of Madinah, which she characterised as a jihad manual by Dhiren Barot.

Amnesty responses

Amnesty responded on its website with a statement by its interim Secretary General, Claudio Cordone:

was suspended ... for not raising these issues internally... speaks about his own views ..., not Amnesty International's... Sometimes the people whose rights we defend may not share each others views–but they all have human rights, and all human rights are worth defending.

Widney Brown of Amnesty also spoke on the NPR program with Sahgal. She said the books sold at his bookstore did not mean that he was not "a legitimate voice on Guantanamo Bay abuses". Responding to the interviewer's observation that Amnesty had sponsored Begg's lecture tours in Europe, she said that because Begg was one of the first detainees released, he was considered important for dispelling Guantanamo Bay's secrecy. Brown said that, as a British citizen, Begg has "an incredibly effective voice in talking to governments in Europe about the importance of" their accepting Guantanamo detainees. She praised Sahgal's work, saying:

There's no question about it. Gita is incredibly intelligent, very strong analysis .... She's done great work for us. And I think the real tragedy of this particular circumstance is by going public in this particular way knowing that we were addressing her issue means that she's maybe undermining her own work in fact.

Amnesty's international secretariat Policy Director, Anne Fitzgerald, when asked if she thought Begg was a human rights advocate, said: "It’s something you’d have to speak to him about. I don’t have the information to answer that".

In April 2010, Amnesty circulated a statement internally, saying:

Due to irreconcilable differences of view over policy between Gita Sahgal and Amnesty International regarding Amnesty International’s relationship with Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners, it has been agreed that Gita will leave Amnesty International on 9 April 2010.

Begg response

Begg said of the Taliban: "We need to be engaging with those people who we find most unpalatable. I don’t consider anybody a terrorist until they have been charged and convicted of terrorism".

Begg noted that he worked with groups to empower Muslim women. Sahgal, he says, "has no monopoly on women's rights".

Reactions

Pro-Sahgal

Salman Rushdie

Salman Rushdie said:

Amnesty ... has done its reputation incalculable damage by allying itself with Moazzam Begg and his group Cageprisoners, and holding them up as human rights advocates. It looks very much as if Amnesty's leadership is suffering from a kind of moral bankruptcy, and has lost the ability to distinguish right from wrong. It has greatly compounded its error by suspending the redoubtable Gita Sahgal for the crime of going public with her concerns. Gita Sahgal is a woman of immense integrity and distinction.... It is people like Gita Sahgal who are the true voices of the human rights movement; Amnesty and Begg have revealed, by their statements and actions, that they deserve our contempt.

Denis MacShane, a Member of the British Parliament and former Labour government minister, wrote to Amnesty protesting its suspension of Gita Sahgal: "one of its most respected researchers because she rightly called into question Amnesty’s endorsement of Mozzam Begg whose views on the Taliban and on Islamist jihad stand in total contradiction of everything Amnesty has fought for." He called "Kafkaesque" the fact that Amnesty—"the very organisation meant to defend human rights"—would threaten the career of Sahgal for her having exposed "an ideology that denies human rights".

Writing in The National Post, writer Christopher Hitchens said "It's well-nigh incredible that Amnesty should give a platform to people who are shady on this question and absolutely disgraceful that it should suspend a renowned employee who gave voice to her deep and sincere misgivings," writing in The Independent, journalist and human rights activist Joan Smith said "Amnesty's mistake is simple and egregious", and writing in The Spectator, journalist Martin Bright commented: "It is Gita Sahgal who should be the darling of the human rights establishment, not Moazzam Begg," and columnist Melanie Phillips wrote "her real crime has been to expose the extraordinary sympathy by white 'liberals', committed to 'human rights', for Islamic jihadists—who are committed to the extinction of human rights." The Times wrote: "In an extraordinary inversion of its traditional role, Amnesty has stifled its own still small voice of conscience," and journalist Nick Cohen wrote in The Observer "Amnesty is living in the make-believe world ... where it thinks that liberals are free to form alliances with defenders of clerical fascists who want to do everything in their power to suppress liberals, most notably liberal-minded Muslims." Antara Dev Sen wrote in Daily News and Analysis: "It was a gutsy stand, given the dread of political correctness that cripples our thought and makes us bend over backwards till we almost topple over. ... Suspending Sahgal was an illiberal knee-jerk response unbecoming of this cherished human rights organisation." Farrukh Dhondy wrote in her support, in The Asian Age, as did The Herald (Scotland), columnist and author Mona Charen in Australia's The Daily Advertiser, commentator Jonathan Power in Dubai's Khaleej Times, journalist and author Terry Glavin in the National Post, Spectator contributor Rod Liddle, columnist Jay Nordlinger in National Review, and David Aaronovitch in a column in The Times entitled "How Amnesty Chose the Wrong Poster-boy". Feminist historian Urvashi Butalia also spoke up in her support. Douglas Murray wrote in The Telegraph that "Amnesty is no longer an organisation worth listening to, let alone supporting", and The Wall Street Journal wrote: "it's a pity that a group that was born to give voice to the victims of oppression should now devote itself to sanitizing the oppressors".

Sahgal's mother, novelist Nayantara Sahgal

Sahgal's mother, Nehru's niece novelist Nayantara Sahgal, said she was proud of Gita:

for her very correct and courageous stand. Gita had been taking up the matter for a couple of years now, but after not having received a response she decided to go public—which was a very brave thing to do.... Amnesty has been supporting Begg, legitimising him, making him a partner and sponsoring his tour of Europe. They should at least have checked his credentials. It simply gives them a bad reputation.

An organisation called Human rights for All formed in her defence. They have been joined by many notable supporters.

The Observer wrote in April 2010 that Amnesty had faced few stickier periods since it was founded in 1961, and Oliver Kamm wrote in The Times that Amnesty had shown a "grudging and euphemistic explanation for its behaviour" and that "Disastrously for itself and those who depend on its support, Amnesty is no longer the friend of liberty".

Mixed

Leaked extracts from an internal 10 February 2010 memo by Amnesty's Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi, were published by The Sunday Times. In the memo Zarifi said Amnesty had made a mistake in not making it clearer they did not support Begg's views. Zarifi said Amnesty "did not always sufficiently distinguish between the rights of detainees to be free from torture, and the validity of their views", adding that the organisation "did not always clarify that while we champion the rights of all—including terrorism suspects, and more important, victims of terrorism—we do not champion their views". In a subsequent letter to The Sunday Times, Zarifi said he agreed with Amnesty's actions with regard to Sahgal.

Amnesty decided not to hire Begg for their South Asia campaigns, Widney Brown said: "Sam's view was that, no, he was not the right person for . He raised the concern, and he was heard".

Pro-Begg

Yvonne Ridley

Yvonne Ridley, a British journalist for Iranian-based English language news channel Press TV and a Cageprisoners patron, said Begg was being "demonised", and that he was "a great supporter of women and a promoter of their rights".

Co-author of Enemy Combatant, Victoria Brittain wrote: "Ms Sahgal has contributed to the current climate of intolerance and islamophobia in Britain."

Andy Worthington, critic of Guantanamo Bay detention camp, and friend of Begg, also cited Islamophobia, and then defended Begg. He said, "I know from personal experience that Moazzam Begg is no extremist. We have met on numerous occasions, have had several long discussions, and have shared platforms together at many events."

Select writings

Book

Chapters

See also

References

  1. ^ Shah, Neelima (19 February 2010). "It's Very Human To Disagree; She feels the rip of Amnesty International's barbs for speaking up; Neelima Shah on Gita Sahgal". Outlook. Archived from the original on 24 February 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2010.
  2. ^ Mark Townsend (25 April 2010). "Gita Sahgal's dispute with Amnesty International puts human rights group in the dock". The Observer. London. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  3. ^ Suroor, Hasan (9 February 2010). "Amnesty in row over 'collaborating' with pro-jehadis". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 22 August 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  4. ^ Guttenplan, D. D.; Margaronis, Maria. "Who Speaks for Human Rights?". The Nation. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
  5. Yuval-Davis, Nira; Kannabiran, Kalpana; Kannabirān, Kalpana; Vieten, Ulrike; Kannabiran, Professor Regional Director Council for Social Development Kalpana (10 August 2006). The situated politics of belonging – Google Books. ISBN 9781412921015. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  6. ^ Nair, Malini (21 February 2010). "A fundamental question for human rights groups". Daily News & Review. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  7. "Women Against Fundamentalisms | Variant 16". Variant.org.uk. Archived from the original on 10 September 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  8. Amit Roy (10 February 2010). "The Telegraph – Calcutta (Kolkata) | Amnesty suspends Nehru kin". The Telegraph. Calcutta. Archived from the original on 11 September 2012. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  9. ^ Sahgal, Gita (13 May 2010). "Gita Sahgal: A Statement". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  10. ^ Kerbaj, Richard (7 February 2010). "Amnesty International is 'damaged' by Taliban link; An official at the human rights charity deplores its work with a 'jihadist'". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 3 June 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
  11. Bird, Steve (13 April 2010). "Gita Sahgal, who criticised Amnesty's 'pro-jihadi' links, leaves job". The Times. London. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
  12. "Amnesty suspends Nehru kin Gita Sahgal – NewsofAP.com – Andhra Pradesh News, Andhra News, Andhra Pradesh, Telugu News". NewsofAP.com. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  13. "Who we are". Southall Black Sisters. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  14. Smith-Spark, Laura (8 December 2004). "In Depth | How did rape become a weapon of war?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 September 2010. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  15. "Sex charges haunt UN forces". Christian Science Monitor. ISSN 0882-7729. Archived from the original on 21 November 2010. Retrieved 16 February 2010.
  16. ^ Pratt, David (11 February 2010). "The right-on are wrong to champion so-called victims". The Herald (Scotland). Archived from the original on 6 November 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
  17. "'Team', Centre for Secular Space". centreforsecularspace.org. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  18. "Gita Sahgal". National Secular Society. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  19. "Video on 'forced marriages' sent to schools". BBC News. 11 March 2002. Retrieved 21 February 2010.
  20. Ruchir Joshi (10 June 2007). "'Unprovoked'-A historic moment swallowed by the box office". The Telegraph (India). Calcutta. Archived from the original on 4 February 2013. Retrieved 16 February 2010.
  21. Gupta, Rahila (9 February 2010). "Double standards on human rights". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 11 February 2010.
  22. ^ Aaronovitch, David (9 February 2010). "How Amnesty chose the wrong poster-boy; Collaboration with Moazzam Begg, an extremist who has supported jihadi movements, looks like a serious mistake". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
  23. Bright, Martin (7 February 2010). "Gita Sahgal: A Statement". The Spectator. Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  24. "Joan Smith: Amnesty shouldn't support men like Moazzam Begg". The Independent. 11 February 2010. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2010.
  25. ^ "Is Amnesty International Supporting a Jihadist?". All Things Considered. NPR. 27 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.
  26. Chakraberty, Sumit, "Gita Sahgal talks about human wrongs", Daily News & Analysis, 21 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.
  27. "Dangerous liaisons". Daily News and Analysis. 18 April 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  28. ""Amnesty International on its work with Moazzam Begg and Cageprisoners," 11 February 2010. Retrieved 11 February 2010". Amnestyusa.org. 11 February 2010. Archived from the original on 24 February 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  29. Salman Rushdie's statement on Amnesty International, The Sunday Times, 21 February 2010
  30. "Amnesty has no morals, says Rushdie", The Times of India, 22 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010.
  31. ^ MacShane, Member of British Parliament, Denis (10 February 2010). "Letter To Amnesty International from". Archived from the original on 16 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
  32. Phillips, Melanie (14 February 2010). "The human wrongs industry spits out one of its own". The Spectator. Archived from the original on 17 February 2010. Retrieved 23 February 2010.
  33. Smith, Joan "Joan Smith: Amnesty shouldn't support men like Moazzam Begg; A prisoner of conscience can turn into an apologist for extremism", The Independent, 11 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010
  34. "Hitchens, Christopher, "Christopher Hitchens: Amnesty International's suspension of conscience", The National Post". Retrieved 18 February 2010.
  35. Bright, Martin, "Amnesty International, Moazzam Begg and the Bravery of Gita Sahgal", The Spectator, 7 February 2010 Archived 11 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  36. "Misalliance; Amnesty has lent spurious legitimacy to extremists who spurn its values," The Times, 12 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010
  37. Cohen, Nick, "We abhor torture – but that requires paying a price; Spineless judges, third-rate politicians and Amnesty prefer an easy life to fighting for liberty," The Observer, 14 February 2010, 17 February 2010
  38. Sen, Antara Dev (25 February 2010). "Amnesty's illiberal knee-jerk response". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
  39. "No amnesty for dissent," The Asian Age, 20 February 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2010
  40. Charen, Mona, "Amnesty International betrays its own mission", The Daily Advertiser, 1 March 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010
  41. Power, Jonathan, "Amnesty International Off the Piste", Khaleej Times, 28 February 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2010
  42. Liddle, Rod "Why give money to charity when they shaft what they purport to defend?", The Spectator, 8 February 2010. Retrieved 2 March 2010 Archived 5 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  43. "Glavin, Terry, "Terry Glavin: Amnesty International doubles down on appeasement; This has been going on for far too long. Now it's gone too far," National Post, 8 February 2010, 2 March 2010". National Post. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  44. Murray, Douglas (14 April 2010). "If you support Amnesty International – STOP – Telegraph Blogs". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 21 April 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  45. "Amnesty International and Jihad". The Wall Street Journal. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  46. "Roy, Esha, "Ties with Taliban supporter a damage to Amnesty reputation, says Nehru kin", Indian Express, 17 February 2010. Retrieved 15 February 2010". The Indian Express. 17 February 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  47. "Human Rights For All". Human Rights For All. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011.
  48. World Wide Outcry To Make Amnesty International See Reason and Make Amends Archived 2 August 2012 at archive.today, Human Rights for All, 22 March 2010
  49. Kerbaj, Richard (14 February 2010). "Second Amnesty chief attacks Islamist links". The Times. Archived from the original on 10 May 2011. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  50. Suroor, Hasan (15 February 2010). "Another Amnesty official questions its links with jihadi group". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 14 September 2012. Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  51. "Amnesty misconception". The Sunday Times. 21 February 2010. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  52. Burkeman, Oliver; Pidd, Helen; Tait, Robert (3 July 2007). "'An antidote to Fox': Iran launches English TV channel". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  53. Ridley, Yvonne (28 March 2010). "Milestones Remembered: Yvonne Ridley". Cageprisoners. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  54. Brittain, Victoria (30 June 2010). "Dangerous game: a reply to Gita Sahgal and her supporters". openDemocracy. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  55. Worthington, Andy (10 February 2010). "Defending Moazzam Begg and Amnesty International". Andy Worthington. Retrieved 18 October 2023.

External links

Portals: Categories: