Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/SVera1NY: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:02, 15 January 2006 view sourceBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,616 edits →Oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:26, 11 May 2022 view source WOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators855,716 editsm Fix lint errors 
(22 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
==Support== ==Support==
#'''Support'''. --] 09:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support'''. --] 09:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''<font color="green">]</font>''' 20:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support''' ''']''' 20:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">]</font></font> 23:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support'''. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">]</font></font> 23:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''': This looks user truelly looks he deserves it - ] 04:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support''': This looks user truelly looks he deserves it - ] 04:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 21: Line 21:
# '''Oppose''', lack of experience. --] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) # '''Oppose''', lack of experience. --] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&mdash;]]] 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #&mdash;]]] 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. --] ] 00:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. --] ] 00:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#--] ] 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #--] ] 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 33: Line 33:
#'''Oppose''', too new. ] 03:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', too new. ] 03:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#] 04:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] 04:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] ] 04:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''.--] 04:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''.--] 04:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Too new. ] 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' Too new. ] 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 41: Line 41:
#'''Oppose'''--] | ] 06:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''--] | ] 06:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] ] 07:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] ] 07:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] (]) 10:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' ] (]) 10:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. --] &#9836; ] 12:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. --] &#9836; ] 12:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&mdash;] ] 12:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #&mdash;] ] 12:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#:'''Oppose''' ] 13:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #:'''Oppose''' ] 13:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#:*Trifon Triantafillidis does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 09:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC) and he had only 26 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (]) &mdash;] ] 15:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #:*Trifon Triantafillidis does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 09:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC) and he had only 26 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (]) &mdash;] ] 15:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 14:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] 14:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 14:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 14:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. --] 15:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. --] 15:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Lack of experience. Keep up good work, though.&mdash;] 17:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Lack of experience. Keep up good work, though.&mdash;] 17:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 56: Line 56:
#'''Oppose''' - needs experience. ] 22:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - needs experience. ] 22:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Too new and not active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. ]]]''']''' 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Too new and not active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. ]]]''']''' 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] | ] 02:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] | ] 02:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
# ]&ne;] 02:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) # ]&ne;] 02:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 63: Line 63:
#] 08:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #] 08:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
# ] | ] | 12:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) # ] | ] | 12:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', Lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', Lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.)''</small> - ] 02:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.)''</small> - ] 02:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] (]) 05:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] (]) 05:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 77: Line 77:
#'''Oppose''' - inexperienced -- ] ] 00:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - inexperienced -- ] ] 00:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. No substance to the statement. ] 01:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. No substance to the statement. ] 01:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperience. -] (<small>] | ]</small>) 05:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Inexperience. --] (<small>] | ]</small>) 05:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose.''' Too inexperienced. --] 19:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose.''' Too inexperienced. --] 19:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperienced, and statement provides no insight. --] 22:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Inexperienced, and statement provides no insight. --] 22:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 01:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] 01:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#--] | ] 06:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC) #--] | ] 06:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 02:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperienced and gives no reason for me to vote for him. ] | ] 02:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' -- ] 06:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' --] 09:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] 00:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
#Inexperience ]&nbsp;] 07:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Lack of experience and flagrant abuse of boxes on userpage. ] 20:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' --] <sup>]</sup> 20:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
# ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 05:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Inexperience ] 20:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' seems to want to be on the Arbcom as a status symbol, not to actually accomplish anything ] 22:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#''']''' ] <small>(])</small> 02:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' --] 04:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', the usual reasons. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 07:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', experience. ] 12:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Not enough experience yet. --] 22:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] 23:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

==Neutral==
#'''Neutral'''. Although from the few responses given to questioning, SVera1NY appears fairly sensible, neutral, and balanced, I feel that her candidacy was too late to be properly investigated via hustings. --] | ] 19:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Neutral'''. Not going to heap it on. ] 18:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Neutral'''. Good, balanced, thinking kid, but doesn't give me much information about what she would do once in "office." Maybe next time. (P.S. - Just how much experience is everyone expecting from the candidates?!) ] 08:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:26, 11 May 2022

SVera1NY

Although I have been a Wikipedian for only a few months, I have contributed alot, especially reverting vandalism and inviting newcomers. I think I would be a great addition to the Committee and would greatly appreciate a post. Thank you very much for your consideration.

Questions

Support

  1. Support. --Kefalonia 09:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Support TestPilot 20:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Support. --HK 23:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support: This looks user truelly looks he deserves it - Chooserr 04:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Michael Snow 00:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose.' Too new. Ambi 00:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. Mo0 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose inexperience. David | explanation | Talk 00:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Zach 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Cryptic (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. Oppose, lack of experience. --Interiot 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. Oppose - Inexperience - Mackensen (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. —Kirill Lokshin 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  11. Oppose. --GraemeL 00:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  12. --Jaranda 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  13. Oppose — Omegatron 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  14. Oppose. Too new at the moment. Batmanand 01:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  15. Oppose - same. Staffelde 01:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  16. Oppose not experienced --Angelo 01:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  17. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  18. Oppose, experience —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  19. Reluctantly oppose as experience really does matter in this type of role. Jonathunder 03:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  20. Oppose, too new. Crunch 03:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  21. Bobet 04:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  22. Oppose. SlimVirgin 04:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  23. Oppose.--ragesoss 04:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  24. Oppose Too new. 172 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  25. Oppose - Experience (lack of) novacatz 04:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  26. Oppose. I don't know you, but wish you the best. Ëvilphoenix 05:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  27. Oppose. android79 06:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  28. Oppose--cj | talk 06:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  29. Oppose. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  30. Oppose Elle vécu heureuse (Be eudaimonic!) 10:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  31. Oppose. --RobertG ♬ talk 12:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  32. —Nightstallion (?) 12:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    Oppose Trifon Triantafillidis 13:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  33. Oppose sorry but I must oppose.  ALKIVAR™ 13:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  34. Oppose.  Grue  14:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  35. Oppose, xp. Radiant_>|< 14:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  36. Oppose. --Viriditas 15:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  37. Oppose. Lack of experience. Keep up good work, though.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 17:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  38. Oppose, xp --kingboyk 19:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  39. Oppose, WAY 2 nu ℬastique▼♥♑ 21:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  40. Oppose. —Quarl 2006-01-09 21:32Z
  41. Oppose - needs experience. Awolf002 22:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  42. Splash 23:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  43. Oppose. Too new and not active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. Hermione1980 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  44. Oppose. Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  45. older≠wiser 02:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  46. Oppose. Fuzzy bunny statement. Fifelfoo 05:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  47. Oppose. Did you send them flowers, too? Avriette 06:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  48. Raven4x4x 08:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  49. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 12:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  50. Oppose, Lack of experience. Prodego 20:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  51. Oppose. (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 02:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  52. Oppose. enochlau (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  53. Oppose. --Masssiveego 07:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  54. Oppose. Not enough experience, not enough thought given to election statment.--JK the unwise 12:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  55. - Vote Signed By: Chazz- Place comments here
  56. Oppose. I'm looking for more experience. --JWSchmidt 23:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  57. Oppose, inexperienced. Sorry — Ian Manka 20:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  58. Oppose - inexperienced. --NorkNork 21:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  59. Krash 18:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  60. Oppose due to lack of experience. Bahn Mi 19:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  61. Oppose Dr. B 23:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  62. Oppose - inexperienced -- Francs2000 00:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  63. Oppose. No substance to the statement. Velvetsmog 01:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  64. Oppose. Inexperience. --Aude (talk | contribs) 05:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  65. Oppose. Too inexperienced. --Optichan 19:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  66. Oppose. Inexperienced, and statement provides no insight. --William Pietri 22:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  67. Oppose. siafu 01:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  68. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  69. Oppose. Preaky 02:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  70. Oppose. Inexperienced and gives no reason for me to vote for him. Superm401 | Talk 02:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  71. Oppose -- Masonpatriot 06:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  72. Oppose --Adrian Buehlmann 09:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  73. Oppose Dannycas 00:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  74. Inexperience Ingoolemo  07:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  75. Oppose. Lack of experience and flagrant abuse of boxes on userpage. Avengerx 20:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  76. Oppose --Loopy 20:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  77. Bratsche 05:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  78. Oppose Inexperience wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 20:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  79. Oppose seems to want to be on the Arbcom as a status symbol, not to actually accomplish anything Cynical 22:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  80. Oppose Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  81. Oppose --moof 04:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  82. Oppose, the usual reasons. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  83. Oppose, experience. KTC 12:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  84. Oppose Not enough experience yet. --Spondoolicks 22:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  85. Oppose CDThieme 23:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Neutral. Although from the few responses given to questioning, SVera1NY appears fairly sensible, neutral, and balanced, I feel that her candidacy was too late to be properly investigated via hustings. --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 19:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Neutral. Not going to heap it on. Youngamerican 18:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Neutral. Good, balanced, thinking kid, but doesn't give me much information about what she would do once in "office." Maybe next time. (P.S. - Just how much experience is everyone expecting from the candidates?!) Author782 08:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)