| Revision as of 16:21, 30 April 2010 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits →FAQ as Policy: background and urging Dreadstar to build a consensus before acting unilaterally← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023 edit undoAshvio (talk | contribs)322 edits →NPOV and gender pronounsTag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
| (82 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == |
== NPOV and gender pronouns == | ||
| Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? ] (]) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Consensus from the above discussions appear to show that a FAQ, including this one, should not be Misplaced Pages Policy. Consensus also seems to be that since this FAQ was consindered Policy for so long and that it contained material considered Policy, that this FAQ should remain policy until all the Policy content was moved to ] or other Policy pages. Most, if not all of this content has been moved, and what remains does not appear to be Policy material. But, in order to alleviate any concerns that material from this FAQ might still be Policy, I propose that while we downgrade this FAQ from being Policy, we also keep the door open to moving any content from to Policy without dispute. Any new content added to this FAQ should not be considered Policy, but instead any new Policy material should be placed on another, more appropriate WP Policy page. Any objections? ] <small>]</small> 20:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Alrighty, this proposal has been up for ten days without any further objections. In keeping with the , and since this proposal covers any future requests to move material from to another, appropriate Policy page without dispute, then I think it's very safe to 'downgrade' this from Policy to juat a FAQ. I'll go ahead and do that shortly if there are no further objections. Thanks! ] <small>]</small> 03:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um, no. This was always policy ever since it was spun off from the NPOV article since 2006. And read the archived discussion in 2006 at Talk:NPOV on the spin off; it was only allowed to be spun off on the condition that it remain policy or else it was to be folded back in. ] (]) 15:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Are there any reliable sources that indicate that ] people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. ] (]) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Hang on a sec - are you saying there should not be a FAQ for this policy? I'm unclear on what the reasoning is. ]<small><sup>]</sup>]</small> 16:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I was part of the original discussion to spin this off and party to the original compromise. And that compromise called for the content spun out of the NPOV policy to the FAQ to remain policy or to be rolled back into NPOV. This stood since 2006 and Dreadstar's unitlateral demotion of this page. Dreadstar, if you want to make such sweeping changes to part of the project's core policy, you're going to need the broad consensus of the community. Until you have that, please stop acting unilaterally to degrade this policy. ] (]) 16:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Wording of "Anglo-american bias" == | |||
| "The Anglo-American focus is in part a reflection of there being so many U.S. and European Anglophone people working on the project, ''which in turn is a reflection of the fact that so many of them have access to the Internet.''" | |||
| I don't think latter part is a good formulation. It seems to imply that English-speaking people have a better access to the Internet than others. But this is not true: according to statistics, French- and German-speakers have an equally good access to the Internet. The wording should be changed to something like ''which in turn is a reflection of the fact that so many English-speakers like to edit the English Misplaced Pages.'' ] (]) 13:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
NPOV and gender pronouns
Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? 212.55.46.63 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that indicate that misgendering people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. Ashvio (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)