Misplaced Pages

User talk:Itake: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:49, 22 January 2006 editFormer user 20 (talk | contribs)2,136 edits →No personal attacks← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:19, 24 January 2024 edit undoIxfd64 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators69,882 edits Notification: listing of File:Spcscreen.JPG at WP:Files for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(185 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== ] ==
== Help with Translation!? ==


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 -->


== ] ==
''Albania is also rich in rivers and streams with significant hydroelectric potential. These have been exploited quite effectively, making the country an energy exporter. A number of huge hydroelectric power plants have been built, mainly on the Drin River, and more than half of the country's arable land is irrigated, largely from the artificial reservoirs created upstream of the dams.''


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
--] 10:04, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
==Editing==
Are you refering to the kd article or to the other one? If you meant the KD article, I just fixed some minor header mistakes that you had made, and on the other article, I added some wikilinks and stub categories. I had no idea that would disturb you. I was just trying to help Misplaced Pages. (] 01:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC))


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Itake. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
NP, its just that I got an annoying error when I edited it because someone else had edited it while I was typing. Its no big issue, its done now so you can help me tidy it up if you want ] 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Violating civility ==


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
That's it, you've pushed it too far . Continue violating ] and you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --<font style="background: #000000" face="Impact" color="#00a5ff">]</font> 04:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/9&oldid=750550523 -->
:Those are strong words from a regular user like the rest of us. Aren't ''you'' violating the civility guidelines? --] 05:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
== File:Spcscreen.JPG listed for discussion ==

] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 05:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
:: I'll see you in the area of the blocked people then, Cyde. ] 14:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

== Hello! ==

Hi Itake, I hope you're well. I was reading your dialogue with ] and I have to say that you were right on the money. He can be a single-minded troll and you exposed him. Saying that ] is a diploma mill exemplifies his POV and reveals that he probably isn't thinking in the best interest of Misplaced Pages.

Keep in touch. I'd be happy to know you better, brother.

Sincerely, --] 05:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
: None of these self-righteous tards have wikipedia's best interest at heart. They want to shape this encyclopedia to fit their own world views, and we shouldn't let them. ] 14:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

::Both of you need an objectivity lesson. And Itake needs a civility lesson. ] ] 17:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

::: What's the matter, Daycd? Can't you just feel that "Christian" love? - ] 19:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:::: Sarcasm is my second language little boy. ] 23:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

::::: I'm your huckleberry. Show me what you've got. - ] 01:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

== Come and vote your mind ==

Dear Christian friend,

I saw you on the list of Christian Wikipedians and wanted to let you know about something. The other day, someone nominated 12 Christian biography entries for deletion! They include a Christian university list of people (not unlike 68 other lists like it), presidents of universities, and authors of many books.

Since that time, people have been voting. Please take this message as a call to vote; not a call to vote a certain way. I respect you and your ability to come, read the entry, and make a wise decision. In other words, I’m not vote stacking or campaigning; simply letting you know something that you’d probably like to know.

By the way, my friend recently started an organization called . If you’d like to join a network of Christians with a purpose on Misplaced Pages, please see the site!

Below are some of the links that need attention. Thanks for your consideration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_DeYoung

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Morey

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._Otis_Ledbetter

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Pack

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mal_Couch

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Ice

God bless you,
] 07:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

== No personal attacks ==

In response to your message ... this is your final warning. Stop the personal attacks. --<font style="background: #000000" face="Impact" color="#00a5ff">]</font> 18:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

I came here to warn you about edits like this , but I see you've already been warned so I'll just reaffirm what Cyde is telling you. Continued personal attacks, even oblique ones, are not acceptable. ] 18:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:: No of course not. Personal attacks are only acceptable when directed against other people, right? Its okay to accuse people of multying, using meatpuppets, being POV etc but not to respond to those attacks? Your POV and bias is getting really tiresome. Go away, and go get a life. ] 19:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:::Jason Gastrich is well known for using sockpuppets - see - and has attempted to swing consensus his way by recruiting people that he thinks will vote how he wants. Stating this isn't a personal attack. POV accusations are perhaps borderline, as you can't prove someone's opinions as has been extensively done with regards to his sockpuppetry and recruiting. Calling people retards, however, definitely violates ] and ]. --] <small>]</small> 19:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:::: No, that is a personal attack. The sockpuppet thing is still under investigation obviously, which is why it called "suspected". Whether he is doing "meatpuppetry" is also under investiagation. So yes, then it is personal attacks. Its blatantly doing what should not be acceptable, casting accusations and unfounded criticism. You are pushing a campaign to label this user something he's not, you are trying to make something that is under investigation sound like a cleared up matter. The attacks on mine and Gastrich's religion, the small insinuations that are just borderline insults, That is not okay, and when you stop doing that I will stop the personal attacks myself. Until then, go away. ] 23:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

::::: Interesting. So you interpret Matthew 5:39 as not applying to you, then? - ] 01:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

::::: What does the bible have to do with sockpuppets? Is there a point in your rants? ] 04:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

:::::: I didn't rant. I simply asked you if Matthew 5:39 applies to you. Try again. - ] 05:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

::::::: It applies to everyone. ] 05:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

::::::: I didn't ask that. I asked if it applies to ''you''. Yes or no. - ] 05:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

::::::::Dave Horn (WarriorScribe) is a menace to religious people, so don't fall for his nonsense. He's been harrassing Christians on Usenet for awhile. See here for chronicles of his miserable behavior.
::::::::You don't owe him an answer. Pray for him. God will be taking care of him for eternity unless he sees the light. --] 05:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

You have been temporarily blocked for 24 hours from editing for violating ] despite previous warnings. ] 23:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

: We'l see about that. ] 04:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:19, 24 January 2024

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Itake. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Spcscreen.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spcscreen.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)