| Revision as of 19:38, 23 January 2006 editGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits →violation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:01, 14 March 2024 edit undoJayCubby (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,665 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Giovannibanhater (talk): NopeTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Welcome to the Misplaced Pages'''!'''== | |||
| The above named Arbitration case has closed. Giovanni33 is banned for a duration of one year by the Arbitration Committee. You may view the case at the above linked page. | |||
| ] to the ], Giovanni33! And thanks for fixing the typo over on the ] article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a ]! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your ] into the Misplaced Pages experience: | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee,<br> | |||
| * Take a look at the ] and ]. | |||
| - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 21:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * When you have time, you can peruse ], and ], but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki! | |||
| * Always keep the notion of ] in mind, be respectful of others' ], and remember ''your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable''! | |||
| * If you need any ], post your question at the ]. | |||
| * Explore, ], and, above all else, have fun! | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| And some odds and ends: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] | ] 00:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Best of luck, Giovanni33, and have fun! ] 07:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == violation == | |||
| Please review ]...thanks. ] 13:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Also, please look at ]. Thanks...] 13:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, Giovanni33. I'm a little concerned that you seemed to acknowledge that you are the same as ] and that he seemed to be denying it . Obviously, there's nothing wrong with forgetting to log on occasionally, or even deliberately not logging on if you're at a strange computer and in a hurry. But since you are making a lot of reverts, and we have a policy on that, and since Belinda claims on the ] that five editors at least agree with your version, it's important to know if you are both accounts or only one. Could you please clarify? (And if you are 64.121.40.153, could you try to log on when posting.) Thanks. ] ] 17:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Ann. My IP address is [[User:64.121.40.153|. I never denied otherwise. I have always had the same IP address--one and only. Any other IP address would not be me since I've never used a different PC to edit here. I have already agreed to log in (the times my IP address shows instead of my name is due to not being log on). | |||
| I do not know why I seem to have been accused of having more than one account. A diversionary tactic, that is a sign of desperation? hehe I looked at your links and I only see that I said the same things Im saying here: that I only have one account and one IP address. Not loggin in does not mean I have two accounts, since its the same IP address, right? KHM03 lumped me together with another user, Belinda. I denied that I was someone else (any IP address other than 64.121.40.153), stating I have only one account. How is this possibly interpreted as a denial that my own IP address is mine? The other user I was being lumped with has a different IP address. Can you clarify what about this needs clarification since I've already stated this? Giovanni33 18:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)] 18:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Giovanni. Thanks for your reply. No, there was no accusation, just a question, and since you've clarified, nothing else needs clarification. The problem was that you were doing a lot of reverts (well, I know I was too!) but you were making some as Giovanni33 and some as 64.121.40.153. As you know, if you revert more than three times in any 24-hour period (and partial reverts count), you can be blocked from editing by an administrator. And the three reverts are considered an absolute limit, not an entitlement. If you split the reverts between your IP address and your username, you can still be blocked. Now, since Belinda was claiming that at least five editors agreed with your version, it seemed important to establish how many of you there are. I never thought it was likely that you were Belinda (though in the case of new editors sharing the same views, we don't generally rule out the possibility); nor do I imply that you're doing anything dishonest in using your username for some edits and your IP address for others. I do ask you to log in as much as possible, though, since it's confusing for people who read the talk page or who check the article history to find out who wanted what. It's natural when a lot of new users and IP addresses suddenly appear, and favour the same versions of the article, that those who've been around longer would wonder. Also, ] signed on the talk page as Belinda, and shortly afterwards, the new editor ] appeared. So I wonder if that's ''one'' of the "five" who approved your version, or ''two''? Cheers. ] ] 18:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree with the restoration of the historical chart on ]; it may have gotten inadvertently deleted at one point...but there is no complaint from me on that one. ] 18:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It appears I have been blocked from making any further edits. This was right after I made some edits to addressing points in the talk page in goodwill on my part, not to do any reverts (except the Historical Chart, which no one disputs). Yet, looks like I have been blocked as a result anyway. ] 19:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 14 March 2024
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33
The above named Arbitration case has closed. Giovanni33 is banned for a duration of one year by the Arbitration Committee. You may view the case at the above linked page.
For the Arbitration Committee,
- Penwhale | 21:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of List of incurable diseases
I have nominated List of incurable diseases, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of incurable diseases. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JFW | T@lk 00:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)