| Revision as of 08:32, 4 June 2010 editNcmvocalist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,127 edits →About ArbCom case: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:43, 13 June 2024 edit undoA09 (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers10,432 editsm A09 moved page User talk:Rvcx to User talk:422f2931915f677 without leaving a redirect: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Rvcx" to "422f2931915f677" | ||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Outing and edit waring. == | |||
| If you think this constitutes outing, the appropriate thing to do is to go to ], not perpetuate an edit war. ] (]) 19:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Wrong. ] is for expunging history and is available as a longer-term solution; ] is very clear that reverting the offending comment is the right short-term solution. ] (]) 19:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::From ]; ''Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for Oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages permanently''.] (]) 19:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's exactly what I'm referring to—requests to oversight don't get answered immediately, so in the meantime you just rely on plain old reverts. What's the confusion here? ] (]) 19:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oversighting also apparently isn't possible in AN/I threads. I'm not sure why that's the case, but it's what I was told when I requested oversight for Mathsci's original comment accusing me of being a holocaust denier, and it's the reason why the diff of his comment about this has never been removed. --] (]) 20:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 13:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == About ArbCom case == | |||
| A couple of arbs have indicated that the involved parties list can be trimmed further, and I agree - though I think you can help with this issue. Have a look at what I said on my talk about the issue and consider whether Arthur Rubin and Beyond My Ken are involved parties - if not, perhaps you'd be ready to remove them? This might mean you need to quickly skim through previous ANIs, WQAs, BLPNs and of course relevant article talk/history. At the same time, you could remove the notification diff with respect to me (and these editors, should you find that they ought to be removed too)? Cheers, ] (]) 08:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC) | |||