Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sigal Cohen: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:45, 10 June 2010 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,484 editsm Reverted edits by Snottywong (talk) to last version by Location← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:50, 6 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ] (]) 03:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Sigal Cohen}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sigal Cohen}}|2=AfD statistics}}) :{{la|Sigal Cohen}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sigal Cohen}}|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 12: Line 18:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 22:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 22:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)</small>
<hr style="width:50%;" /> <hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Delete''' I wasn't able to locate any coverage in reliable secondary sources nor any indication of a "large fan base or a significant 'cult' following". Perhaps over time this will change, but currently I couldn't find any press coverage. ] (]) 01:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''' I wasn't able to locate any coverage in reliable secondary sources nor any indication of a "large fan base or a significant 'cult' following". Perhaps over time this will change, but currently I couldn't find any press coverage. ] (]) 01:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' notable israeli model.--] (]) 23:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' notable israeli model.--] (]) 23:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
::This is not an argument. see ].--] (]) 09:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC) ::This is not an argument. see ].--] (]) 09:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Per ]. ] (]) 09:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Per ]. ] (]) 09:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' She is notable, by model standards of notability, from being on the cover of the magazines listed by Moorsmur, and probably others out there. The article list all the notable people she has modeled for as well. ]''' 03:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' She is notable, by model standards of notability, from being on the cover of the magazines listed by Moorsmur, and probably others out there. The article list all the notable people she has modeled for as well. ] 03:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
::'''Question''' What are the "model standards of notability"? I searched throughout the site and didn't find any criteria matching "being on a magazine cover" P.s. no sources are provided for the "notable people she has modeled for". Maybe you can find sources for these claims? --] (]) 07:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC) ::'''Question''' What are the "model standards of notability"? I searched throughout the site and didn't find any criteria matching "being on a magazine cover" P.s. no sources are provided for the "notable people she has modeled for". Maybe you can find sources for these claims? --] (]) 07:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. As is, the article fails ] and ]. ] (]) 18:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. As is, the article fails ] and ]. ] (]) 18:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' No sources can be found to establish ] or pass ]. ] <small>]</small> 18:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 08:50, 6 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 03:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Sigal Cohen

Sigal Cohen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable according to Misplaced Pages policy on notability WP:ENT. (note: don't be led astray by "number of Google results". Thousands of people called "Sigal Cohen" live in Israel.) Nikonmer (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Comment - This AfD nomination is made by a "new" editor whose first edit was this nomination for deletion. Moorsmur (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Being a "cover girl" is by no means a proof of notability. See WP:N.--Maashatra11 (talk) 09:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete From the article I get the impression she's a person doing a job. I can't see any particular notability in this person doing this job. The one reference merely establishes that she exists. It contains the statement about the most perfect body - but doesn't do any more to prove it or to say who chose her from the rest of the chosen people. Is modelling swimsuits for a retailer of budget clothing anything special? Peridon (talk) 20:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
This is not an argument. see WP:ITSNOTABLE.--Maashatra11 (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Question What are the "model standards of notability"? I searched throughout the site and didn't find any criteria matching "being on a magazine cover" P.s. no sources are provided for the "notable people she has modeled for". Maybe you can find sources for these claims? --Maashatra11 (talk) 07:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.