Misplaced Pages

User talk:DusanSK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:31, 16 June 2010 editDusanSK (talk | contribs)6 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:24, 16 June 2010 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,499 edits →June 2010 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== June 2010 == == June 2010 ==
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''] indefinitely''' from editing for '''sockpuppetry'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. ] (]) 17:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''] indefinitely''' from editing for '''sockpuppetry'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. ] (]) 17:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->
{{unblock|"not sure who you're socking for, but it's pretty blatant" is that a reason to block me? you don't even specify whose sock I am accused to be? I am not a sock}} {{unblock reviewed|"not sure who you're socking for, but it's pretty blatant" is that a reason to block me? you don't even specify whose sock I am accused to be? I am not a sock|decline=Checkuser verified sockpuppet of banned user. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)}}
:...and that's why the edit summary on your first contribution ever was inaccurate, but matched one two below it in the history, which was the other editor's 3rd revert, and your second contribution was to request protection on that page.--] (]) 17:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC) :...and that's why the edit summary on your first contribution ever was inaccurate, but matched one two below it in the history, which was the other editor's 3rd revert, and your second contribution was to request protection on that page.--] (]) 17:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


::Because it was the correct argumentation(] (]) 17:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)) ::Because it was the correct argumentation(] (]) 17:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC))


::What about this argumentation from the opposite side: (cur | prev) 00:32, 16 June 2010 Hobartimus (talk | contribs) (10,255 bytes) (per Squash Racket? (] (]) 17:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)) ::What about this argumentation from the opposite side:
::(cur | prev) 00:32, 16 June 2010 Hobartimus (talk | contribs) (10,255 bytes) ('''per Squash Racket''')? (] (]) 17:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC))

Latest revision as of 18:24, 16 June 2010

June 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DusanSK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"not sure who you're socking for, but it's pretty blatant" is that a reason to block me? you don't even specify whose sock I am accused to be? I am not a sock

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of banned user. --jpgordon 18:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

...and that's why the edit summary on your first contribution ever was inaccurate, but matched one two below it in the history, which was the other editor's 3rd revert, and your second contribution was to request protection on that page.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Because it was the correct argumentation(DusanSK (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC))
What about this argumentation from the opposite side:
(cur | prev) 00:32, 16 June 2010 Hobartimus (talk | contribs) (10,255 bytes) (per Squash Racket)? (DusanSK (talk) 17:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC))