| Revision as of 23:13, 6 July 2010 view source71.213.116.225 (talk) →Query← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:51, 23 November 2015 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,459 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (132 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{doppelganger|Pfagerburg|due to ongoing harassment}} | |||
| Dude, are you really using and ordering ATMELs or are you here just for propaganda ? | |||
| It's not quite a doppelgänger, since there is an edit history on this account. However, due to ongoing harassment, I have decided to cease using this account, and begin using another account. Arbcom and Checkuser will be informed of the new account name shortly. | |||
| :Your question is irrelevant to the fact that the observations in the article about supply and willingness to sell small quantities badly violated ] and ]; that is why they were removed. | |||
| :Still, I will respond to your question: yes, I have been using and ordering AVR's for about 10 years now. I used to have an STK200 and STK300, way back when you you needed a different kit for the Mega103 and Mega603, which were the only mega's at the time. I also remember when you could sell AT90S2313's for $20 on ebay because they were in very short supply and someone had designed it into a satellite card hacking device circa 2000/2001. | |||
| :More recently, I just finished designing a Mega324P into a piece of automated test equipment for a customer. ] (]) 17:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The e-mail address associated with this account is valid; the "E-mail this user" link will work. | |||
| I will continue through my new account to honour all agreements made with various admins relating to reverting edits of a certain banned user, reporting socks, etc. etc. ] (]) 02:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Coke== | |||
| Af89003a <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| It's $2.50 here from a vending machine. From the supermarket, 24 for $3.99. I'm not sure how that works. --] (]) 00:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Still here == | |||
| Feel free to leave a comment on my talk page, but it's better to use e-mail to contact me, or to alert me to something that must be discussed here or other places on-wiki. The e-mail address in my account is active; the "Email this user" link will work. ] (]) 01:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Your account will be renamed == | ||
| <div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"> | |||
| After doing two reverts, it dawned on me that maybe I should put the explanation here, instead of duplicating it all over the place. Official WP policy is that "'''anyone''' is free to revert '''any''' edits made in defiance of a ban." (, emphasis mine) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See ] for more information. | |||
| I am slowly removing the edits of various sockpuppets of a banned user. In some edit summaries, I refer to "old edits," which might lead some editors to think that I am reverting everything this user every edited. These "old edits" were still made when the user was blocked () or banned (]). I am not reverting any edits made while this user was not under a block or ban. The latest sockpuppet investigation can be found . | |||
| Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pfagerburg. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pfagerburg~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can ]. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit ] to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed. | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=Linuxmdb}}</s> already done before I got to it | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=AmaTsisqa}}</s> already done before I got to it | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=71.219.59.226}}</s> done (just one article that hadn't been cleaned up yet by another editor) | |||
| This one was not part of the SPI, but it is obvious from the articles edited and the content inserted that it is the same sockmaster. | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=71.219.51.124}}</s> done | |||
| Other sockpuppets are listed in an earlier archived sockpuppet and checkuser requests, and will be dealt with eventually, including | |||
| Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in. | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=Jvmphoto}}</s> only edits were to talk pages, responses to WP policy actions, and many edits to a now-deleted page. Nothing to do for this sockpuppet. | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=166.70.238.43}}</s> done, some were already edited out since the original edit in defiance of the ban | |||
| * {{user1|1=166.70.238.44}}, holy crap that was one profilic sock | |||
| Sorry for the inconvenience. | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> edited out in the intervening time | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already got it earlier while cleaning up another IP sock | |||
| :*<s>]</s> edits are too tangled to cleanly revert, and piecemeal reversion opens me to WP:COI claims. Have to leave this one alone | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> oh yeah, I took care of that one right after it happened. | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> has been substantially re-edited since then | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*<s>]</s> has been substantially re-edited since then | |||
| :*<s>]</s> done | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already has been edited out | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] only the ref to Mountain Sweetroot remains | |||
| :*<s>]</s> someone else took care of it around the time it happened. | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already edited out | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already edited out | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already edited out | |||
| :*<s>]</s> other editors took care of it at the time | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> already edited out | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> another editor took care of it at the time | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> he self-reverted 7 minutes later. Odd. | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*<s>]</s> leave alone, part of a larger dialogue, correct conclusion was reached | |||
| :*<s>]</s> leave alone, part of a larger dialogue, correct conclusion was reached | |||
| :*<s>]</s> section started by the sockpuppet has been moved into archives, notice at the top of archive pages says not to edit. | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| Yours,<br />]<br />Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=166.70.238.45}}</s> done, not many edits from this IP, and some were already reverted | |||
| </div> 02:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=166.70.238.46}}</s> done, some were already reverted or had been edited out | |||
| <!-- SUL finalisation notification --> | |||
| * <s>{{user1|1=69.2.248.210}}</s> only edits were to talk pages, responses to WP policy actions, and many edits to a now-deleted page. Nothing to do for this sockpuppet. | |||
| == Renamed == | |||
| I've noticed that a few other editors have already taken care of some of the articles. ] (]) 04:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr”> | |||
| Take a look at user Gbelknap while you're at it. Hasn't edited since 2008, but a fairly obvious sock when you dig into the contribs. ] (]) 14:37, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| This account has been renamed as part of ]. If you own this account you can ] for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: ]. -- ] (]) | |||
| :I don't think that account is a sockpuppet. | |||
| </div> 17:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- SUL post-rename notification --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :*Searching for the account name and the name of the company in the account's edit history yields a real-world identity which makes perfect sense given the editing pattern - two articles about a technology marketed by his employer, and one article created about said employer. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :*Checkuser would be worthless, because the edits are too old for WP to still have the IP addresses. Though I would bet dollars to donuts the edits came from that company's IP address(es). | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| :*The account has behaved itself remarkably well. After creating a page for his employer, he responded properly to the AfD, and has not edited on any other subjects since then. His mission accomplished, he retired from editing. | |||
| :*Approximately one month after Gbelknap's edits, a certain well-known IP address was all over the company's article, posting claims about litigation in a series of edits. Gbelknap didn't even go back to edit out these claims (i.e. he avoided edit-warring). | |||
| :I'm going to pass on Gbelknap; I believe that the account was not controlled by the sockmaster who is at issue here. I'm quite willing to be proven wrong, if someone believes otherwise and can support their argument. ] (]) 02:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===Query=== | |||
| I have undone a few of your reverts on pages that I have on my watchlist. From what I've seen, for the most part, these old edits were cited to reliable sources, concise, with proper grammar and spelling. I don't see any reason to revert these old edits unless there's something I'm missing. Why not just pick out the bad faith edits and revert those without touching the decent ones? Just because Misplaced Pages policy says we ''can'' revert edits of banned users subverting that ban doesn't mean it's the best thing for the encyclopedia to do so. Can you help me understand why you feel you must revert these edits? ] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 17:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :. And in this particular case, the part of that policy that says "The measure of a site ban is that even if the user were to make good edits, permitting them to re-join the community poses enough risk of disruption, issues, or harm, that they may not edit at all, ''even if the edits seem good.''" (emphasis in original) | |||
| :The user in question has been permanently blocked many times, and brings nothing but grief to the project every time he is able to get himself unblocked. The site ban came only after verified evidence of off-wiki harassment of at least one other editor. | |||
| :Other issues (real life tends to get in the way) have prevented me from cleaning up this sockpuppet's violations of a block (and then a ban) until now. I apologize for the delay, and preemptively agree with anyone who wants to state that it would have been better to clean it up when it happened. ] (]) 21:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't disagree that banned users have been banned for a reason and their editing is not to be allowed. But what, now, is the purpose of reverting two-year-old edits that are decently done? Banning and blocking is not meant to be punitive but is instituted to protect the encyclopedia. How is it helping to revert these edits from two years ago? In fact, it might even be perceived that removing these cited paragraphs (mostly cited to a single source, I see) is doing more harm than good. It specifically impacts ] as many of the articles are within the scope of that project. If we want that info back on those articles, we'll now have to do a great deal of legwork to accomplish that. What protective purpose does it serve to undo these edits now? ] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 01:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::After careful consideration, it is my judgment that those edits were an attempt to game the system - either let him flout the rules by leaving the good edits intact, or revert a good edit. The policy spells this out pretty clearly, and says that even "good" edits can be reverted. | |||
| :::So, the "protective purpose" from my point of view is to show that WP policy applies to all editors, and that no editor has an "agreement" with WP that allows them to ignore policies, or avoid a justly-deserved block or ban. | |||
| :::I dispute your assertion that there is "a great deal of legwork" to return information to the articles. You're returning all of the information to each article with a single revert, but even if you didn't, the refs are still present in the article history, and it shouldn't be a problem for someone to grab a copy of Tilford and add new content. | |||
| :::As a show of good faith, I will temporarily refrain from reverting as we continue this discussion. | |||
| ::::N.B. I am talking only about the Mar/Apr 2008 edits to the ] articles. There are a few active socks right now, and I am reverting these as soon as I notice them. ] (]) 01:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::However, I stand behind the explicit text of the WP policy: "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in defiance of a ban." I don't see any references there to a time frame, or (to raise the issue pre-emptively) a COI on the part of the reverting editor. ] (]) 01:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Personal Vendetta == | |||
| This user Paul Fagerburg is on a personal vendetta and should be banned. he filed legal action against Jeff Merkey and is simply on a personal vendetta because the judge dismissed his suit, fined him, and told him to avoid Jeff. As is evident, he is destroying content in Misplaced Pages for no reason other than personal revenge. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:51, 23 November 2015
 | This account (Pfagerburg~enwiki) is a doppelgänger account created by Pfagerburg, an established user, due to ongoing harassment. Please see their talk page for relevant discussion. You can also view Pfagerburg~enwiki's edit count by clicking here.
Administrators: Please notify Pfagerburg when taking any action on this account, or any related user pages. |
It's not quite a doppelgänger, since there is an edit history on this account. However, due to ongoing harassment, I have decided to cease using this account, and begin using another account. Arbcom and Checkuser will be informed of the new account name shortly.
The e-mail address associated with this account is valid; the "E-mail this user" link will work.
I will continue through my new account to honour all agreements made with various admins relating to reverting edits of a certain banned user, reporting socks, etc. etc. Pfagerburg (talk) 02:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Coke
It's $2.50 here from a vending machine. From the supermarket, 24 for $3.99. I'm not sure how that works. --NellieBly (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pfagerburg. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pfagerburg~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
17:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)