Misplaced Pages

:Miscellany for deletion/Misplaced Pages:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:11, 7 July 2010 editMiami33139 (talk | contribs)6,175 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net. (TW Latest revision as of 03:52, 24 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1='''Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net'''}}|}}<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
__NOINDEX__
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to nominate a miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the discussion was '''Default keep.''' No consensus. ], waits for audience ], not a ]. 16:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====
This was userfied to rescue it from being deleted. It hasn't been worked on despite the desperate cries that it could be fixed. This article is dead and still hanging around as a ]. ] (]) 04:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC) This was userfied to rescue it from being deleted nine months ago. It hasn't been worked on despite the desperate cries that it could be fixed. This article is dead and still hanging around as a ]. ] (]) 04:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Violates spirit of ] (although that may refer to userspace while this is a subpage of a WikiProject). At any rate, it has been dormant for over 8 months, and does not show any promise of development. ] (]) 01:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' No deadline here, did you contact the wikiproject and ask about it? Also the conflict between the last editor of the article and the nom makes this look pretty pointy. ] (]) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
**What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox? ] (]) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
***It would seem you are wikistalking Tothwolf's contributions. Of the 30 or so things at MfD right now, at least 3 of them are you nominating things he's worked on. You were involved in an Arbcom case where you were accused of following that same user around and nominating their stuff for deletion. Given the massive size of Misplaced Pages, you'd think it would be trivial to avoid MfDing user/project space stuff of theirs--there is a lot more out there. ] (]) 10:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' clearly has possibilities. Lots of articles get fixed after much longer than just a year & it isn't in mainspace, anyway. ''']''' (]) 04:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}

Latest revision as of 03:52, 24 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Default keep. No consensus. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net

This was userfied to rescue it from being deleted nine months ago. It hasn't been worked on despite the desperate cries that it could be fixed. This article is dead and still hanging around as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Miami33139 (talk) 04:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete Violates spirit of WP:FAKEARTICLE (although that may refer to userspace while this is a subpage of a WikiProject). At any rate, it has been dormant for over 8 months, and does not show any promise of development. Johnuniq (talk) 01:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep No deadline here, did you contact the wikiproject and ask about it? Also the conflict between the last editor of the article and the nom makes this look pretty pointy. Hobit (talk) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
    • What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox? Miami33139 (talk) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
      • It would seem you are wikistalking Tothwolf's contributions. Of the 30 or so things at MfD right now, at least 3 of them are you nominating things he's worked on. You were involved in an Arbcom case where you were accused of following that same user around and nominating their stuff for deletion. Given the massive size of Misplaced Pages, you'd think it would be trivial to avoid MfDing user/project space stuff of theirs--there is a lot more out there. Hobit (talk) 10:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep clearly has possibilities. Lots of articles get fixed after much longer than just a year & it isn't in mainspace, anyway. DGG (talk) 04:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.