| Revision as of 23:27, 20 July 2010 editCla68 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers48,127 edits →Question: BLP/CC enforcement request← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:13, 8 November 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Archive 2019) (bot | ||
| (484 intermediate revisions by 85 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{Usertalksuper}} | {{Usertalksuper}} | ||
| {{archive box|<center>] ] ] ] ]</center>}} | {{archive box|<center>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] </center>}} | ||
| ] - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all. | ] - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| CCD: ] | CCD: ] | ||
| == |
== Fossil treelines, et al == | ||
| This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman | |||
| Thanks for the advice. Ill have to remember to count to 10 before posting. I just finished reading the 5 pillars, so I feel in the future I can contribute a little more substance.lol | |||
| Frank | |||
| == about wind power cost per one installization. == | |||
| == Reply == | |||
| <noinclude></noinclude>can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install. | |||
| {{talkback|SlimVirgin#Request to redact:}} | |||
| ==Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!== | |||
| == Climate change arbitration == | |||
| ] | |||
| :::::'''Hi <includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}BASEPAGENAME }}</includeonly>!''' We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started. | |||
| ::::::* ] | |||
| ::::::* ] | |||
| ::::::* ] | |||
| ::::::* ] | |||
| -- <includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}currentdate }}</includeonly> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:TWA/Navigation2}} | |||
| == ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
| Hi, I have that your name be added to the ], as you have been a major editor in the topic area. --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>''' 14:55, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| == Quit VANDALIZING the Al Gore Article == | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| The 'charges have to be filed' standard is one you WHOLLY made up. It is NOT a wik policy.] (]) 15:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Please comment on the talk page. And it would be a good idea to familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages policy first, before accusing someone of vandalising . --] (]) 15:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you feel that is the standard on diaries, go clean up the Nikki Haley diary. If not, you demonstrate that the reason you are editing it is solely political. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::Diaries? Where does diaries come into anything? And sorry - i haven't even got a clue as to who "Nikki Haley" is. --] (]) 13:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] moving to Workshop == | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 --> | |||
| ==Merger discussion for ]== | |||
| This Arbitration case is now moving into the Workshop phase. Please read ] to understand the process. Editors should avoid adding to their evidence sections outside of slight tweaks to aid in understanding; large-scale additions should not be made. Many proposals have already been made and there has already been extensive discussion on them, so please keep the Arbitrators' procedures in mind, namely to keep "''workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible''." Workshop proposals should be relevant and based on already provided evidence; evidence masquerading as proposals will likely be ignored. ~ <font color="#F09">Amory</font><font color="#555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 20:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing—]—has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 18:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Allegations vs. formal charges == | |||
| I noted with interest your recent comments at ]. I think you are right: if it is a mere allegation, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. My question is, in light of this, how would you deal with ]? --] (]) 21:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Voting on Al Gore Talk Page == | |||
| Kim, | |||
| Just wondering if you'd like to vote on the Al Gore issue. I have set up a little voting section , and I am sending this note to everyone who participated on the talk page. --Regards ] (]) 00:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| You think i should be cautioned for being called a proxy for socks? All WMC had to do was remove that accusation, he did not and is now wasting time and causing disruption because of his intransigence. ] (]) 13:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :You were "proxying for a sock". And for that you should be cautioned, more specifically because your later talk-comments indicate that you still haven't figured out what was wrong with your action. --] (]) 13:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::No i was not, i was following ] which says do not alter or remove another editors comments. Until the guy was blocked then the comment should not have been removed. I give up on you, regardless of what WMC says you rush to cover has arse, he broke his civility parole by accusing me of proxing for socks. His refusal to remove the attack is disruptive. ] (]) 13:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::] says no such thing. It in fact states that "harmful edits" <u>can</u> be removed. And edits from a sock is considered harmful. By reinstating the suspected socks comment - you were meatpuppeting (or "proxying") for the suspected sock. --] (]) 13:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Quite frankly to my eyes you are digging yourself deeper by not recognizing that this was a mistake. --] (]) 13:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::My last comment on this ] ''Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism'' What i restored was none of those, it was a harmless comment. You have now writte ''Suspected'' several times. That was my point, it was a suspected sock and until he was blocked his comments should not have been removed. I`m done with you ] (]) 13:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Please see ] as to why you are wrong. --] (]) 13:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==BLP/CC enforcement request== | |||
| . ] (]) 23:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:13, 8 November 2023
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.
LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS
Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox
Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe
William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William
Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper
Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight
CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD
Fossil treelines, et al
This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman
about wind power cost per one installization.
can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install.
Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Misplaced Pages Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Merger discussion for Global warming controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing—Global warming controversy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)