Misplaced Pages

Talk:Adam Kokesh: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:14, 2 August 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,194 editsm Signing comment by 65.112.58.66 - "→Rally for the Republic: "← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:05, 18 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,896,618 editsm +{{WP Politics |libertarianism=yes |libertarianism-importance=mid}}; cleanupTag: AWB 
(132 intermediate revisions by 44 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{WPBiography
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Kokesh, Adam|1=
|living=yes
{{WikiProject Biography |military-work-group=yes |military-priority=Low}}
|class=start
{{WikiProject Military history |class=C |B1 <!-- Referencing and citations -->=n |B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy -->=y |B3 <!-- Structure -->=y |B4 <!-- Grammar and style -->=y |B5 <!-- Supporting materials -->=y |Biography=yes |US=yes}}
|priority=low
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low |AZ=yes|AZ-importance=low}}
|listas=Kokesh, Adam
{{WikiProject Journalism}}
{{WikiProject Politics |libertarianism=yes |libertarianism-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 1
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Adam Kokesh/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#USPP SWAT Team) is no longer available because it was ] before. <!-- {"title":"USPP SWAT Team","appear":{"revid":480273059,"parentid":476251443,"timestamp":"2012-03-05T05:30:20Z","replaced_anchors":{"USPP SWAT TEAM":"USPP SWAT Team"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":618860909,"parentid":618394680,"timestamp":"2014-07-28T19:33:18Z","replaced_anchors":{"USPP SWAT Team":"USPP SWAT team","Rank Structure":"Rank structure","The Air Florida Flight 90 Incident":"The Air Florida Flight 90 incident"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"USPP SWAT team"} -->
}} }}
==Marine Corps Hearing==
There are a few elements in the section regarding Kokesh's upcoming hearing that are inaccurate, from my understanding of the UCMJ and Marine Corps regulations.

* They are not "changing" Kokesh's discharge. He has already been discharged once, from active duty to the IRR. The upcoming discharge is his complete discharge from the service.
* Being in the IRR does not mean you are not under Marine Corps jurisdiction. You are still a reservist, subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
* He is not being recalled to active duty. He was given the opportunity to waive his right to appear before a hearing, and chose to do so. Doing so does not mean he is on "Active Duty."

Unless anyone can provide documentation that shows any of those elements are false, I'll be changing them shortly.--] 19:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
:I think you're probably right. There is just so much spin happening with this story that all of the media are reporting inaccurately. But that's standard. —] (]·]) 06:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
::The hearing is scheduled for today, I'll wait until after the hearing results are announced to make the needed changes. --] 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
:::Papers are reporting that the panel has recommended a General Discharge; whether higher will do that is unknown, as is whether Kokesh will appeal. I'd rather not edit the story, and there's no telling what mis-understandings of military law the papers have. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/4861746.html ] 03:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
::::Your second point is incorrect. Reservists are not subject to the UCMJ except when under a paid status. UCMJ 1-802.2 is clearly worded on what persons are subject to the UCMJ. Even drilling reservists are not subject except during AT, ADT, and drill times. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 18:32, June 5, 2007 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
:::::Your understanding seems to differ from the Air Force's html at http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm ] 19:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
::::::Actually, that link confirms my statement. Let's go through it sentence by sentence if we must: 802. ART. 2. PERSONS SUBJECT TO THIS CHAPTER
(a) The following persons are subject to this chapter:
(1) Members of a regular component of the armed forces, including those awaiting discharge after expiration of their terms of enlistment; volunteers from the time of their muster or acceptance into the armed forces; inductees from the time of their actual induction into the armed forces; and other persons lawfully called or ordered into, or to duty in or for training in the armed forces, from the dates when they are required by the terms of the call or order to obey it. (Mr. Kokesh was not a member of a regular component so (1) does not apply.)
(2) Cadets, aviation cadets, and midshipman. (None of these categories apply.)
(3) Members of a reserve component while on inactive-duty training, but in the case of members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States only when in Federal Service. (Mr. Kokesh was not on inactive-duty training which includes ADT and AT as well as drills--none of which are performed by the IRR.)
(4) Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay. (Again, does not apply.)
(5) Retired members of a reserve component who are receiving hospitalization from an armed force. (Does not apply.)
(6) Members of the Fleet Reserve and Fleet Marine Corps Reserve. (These are people who have retired with at least 20 years but fewer than 30 years of service, therefore it does not apply.)
(7) Persons in custody of the armed forces serving a sentence imposed by a court-martial. (Does not apply.)
(8) Members of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Public Health Service, and other organizations, when assigned to and serving with the armed forces. (Does not apply.)
(9) Prisoners of war in custody of the armed forces. (Does not apply.)
(10) In time of war, persons serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field. (Does not apply.)
(11) Subject to any treaty or agreement which the United States is or may be a party to any accepted rule of international law, persons serving with, employed by, or accompanying the armed forces outside the United States and outside the Canal Zone, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. (Does not apply.)
(12) Subject to any treaty or agreement t which the United States is or may be a party to any accepted rule of international law, persons within an area leased by or otherwise reserved or acquired for use of the United States which is under the control of the Secretary concerned and which is outside the United States and outside the Canal Zone, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. (Does not apply.)

So, you see, "my interpretation" matches the plain text of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 00:29, June 6, 2007 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
:It's been many many years, but my understanding is that he is, indeed, a member by (1); I am not a lawyer of any type, however, not even a seabag lawyer. We were taught (granted, back in the 1960's) that you were subject to the USMJ from the time you raised your hand until the end of your period of enlistment plus whatever Congress or the President wanted. I doubt it's shortened over the years, but it is possible (and if so, will be changed.) ] 03:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
::Your understanding (that he is a member under (1), would require Mr. Kokesh to be a member of a "regular component," which he clearly is not. He is a member of a Reserve Component. The definitions of these terms can be found in US Code: Title 10, 101. The clause of UCMJ-2.2(1) "including those awaiting discharge after expiration of their terms of enlistment", refers to Active duty members who have been involuntarily extended for reasons such as operational commitments, and stop-loss; who remain members of the Regular (Active) Component until they are transferred to the Reserves or fully discharged from service. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 16:39, June 6, 2007 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>

That's interesting. However, note that he was not being punished under the UCMJ. He was being administratively separated, which is a procedure outside the UCMJ. Either way, this far exceeds my layman's understanding of the UCMJ and military law, so, I'm just going to drop it. :) ] 16:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

== Help ==

I've done what I can to fix a real weird thing that BlueMarine did but I'm not sure why he did it or just what to call what he did.

See for yourself

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bluemarine/Adam_Kokesh&action=history

Kokesh shouldn't be mistaken for Bluemarine I know that much. ] 00:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

: Bluemarine (aka ) is a conservative blogger who works for . Bluemarine last edited the Adam Kokesh article on Oct. 1 using his IP address . As you can see self-promotion appears to be the primary purpose of his last edit. He used the opportunity to add a link to his own web site. I think that's why he used his IP address instead of his username when he made the edit. I know for a fact that 213.255.230.132 is Matt Sanchez/Bluemarine because he used this IP several times when responding to comments on his ] (]) 04:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

== Heckling during McCain's speech at ] ==

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=09&year=2008&base_name=interview_with_mccain_heckler

Adam Kokesh was the heckler who help up a sign at the beginning of McCain's acceptance speech at the RNC which read "McCain votes against vets" on one side and "You can't win an occupation" on the other side. After he was thrown out, he gave this brief interview. <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 03:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

== Rally for the Republic ==

Please add a reference to his speech at the Rally for the Republic.
It is located on Youtube.com <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:We can only do that if it's ''legally'' hosted on youtube and from what I've found, all instances of the clip are copyright violations. <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 06:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I'd also like to point out that his comments at the Rally for the Republic were accurate, regarding, "When I went out to fight the War on Terrorism, I found that the real enemies were right here at home." This displayed his blatant disregard for the people who were trying to kill innocent Americans and tried to blame it on us. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Discharge status? ==

In the lead, it says he has an honorable discharge; later, it says ... a general discharge under honorable conditions, a discharge status below honorable. Kokesh appealed the decision, and that appeal was denied. Was the general upgraded to honorable, and if so when, and if not, why doens't the lead say "general discharge under honorable conditions"? ] (]) 21:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Now I've become confused. Was he ever granted an Honorable Discharge? (Note that there are three different discharges being talked about: Honorable Discharge (HD); General Discharge under honorable conditions (GH), General Discharge under other than honorable conditions(GO).) Was the hearing a request to change an HD to a GO, or was the hearing about whether to give him a GH or GO without his having received an HD? ] (]) 16:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


Here's how it happened according to the articles... He got out of the military with an honorable discharge. He remained in the IRR but was discharged with the honorable unless called back... The Marines tried to discharge him from the IRR with an "Other than Honorable" discharge, which would effectively downgrade the original honorable. So yes, he had an honorable discharge first... Note that there is no such thing as a "General Discharge under other than honorable" as you describe. The "other than honorable," known as an OTH, has serious consequences if allowed to happen. Kokesh successfully fought off this serious OTH and instead got the general discharge, which according to a quote from his lawyer, is a middle ground between bad and good so to speak and without the negative consequences that the Marines tried to get.
So the hearing was convened by the Marines to seek the OTH due to the protest activity, but they fought it and got the general... make sense? ] (]) 18:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

If he remained in the IRR he wasn't discharged, he was separated or released. You get a discharge on the transition to not being in the military at all (other than the various militia duties.) There are (as far as I know) five kinds or characters of enlisted discharges:
* Honorable
* General (under honorable conditions) (sometimes can be upgraded to Honorable upon petition)
* General (under Other than Honorable conditions) (not upgradeable to Honorable)
* Bad Conduct (only from a Field or Special Court)
* Dishonorable (only from General Court; considered a felony conviction)

Looks like the language has changed, slightly, since I was typing these, but they are still the five.

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/justicelawlegislation/l/aadischarge1.htm

So he was separated to the IRR, generating a DD214 that says "character of service": HONORABLE; and he would have then normally received an Honorable Discharge at the end of that duty. (There are many reasons to issue a DD214, Discharge being one, others are moving to a different service, to the reserves, from the reserves to active, ....) Due to his behavior in the IRR he was considered not to have continued in that character of service status by the USMC, which proposed awarding him an OTH Discharge. His lawyer managed to get him a General Discharge, which is indeed better than an OTH, but not the Honorable Discharge he would have normally received administratively. There never was an Honorable Discharge, from your description, and there is not one now. ] (]) 19:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

A reservist gets a DD-214 every time he or she leaves active duty. This means that one will be active for a month for training, and they will get a DD-214. After deployment and you get deactivated, another DD-214. Separation from the reserves, DD-214. His second to last DD-214 was honorable due to his speration from service. It is well documented and was the whole point of all the articles about this case. There is no question that he originally had an honorable discharge. His final DD-214 from involuntary separation from the IRR was a general... the "other than honorable" is always referred to as "other than honorable" or simply "OTH" and not as you describe. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== This page is acting as a promotional website for this man ==
Yes, they can accumulate a pile of them. But they don't say "Discharge" in box 11a, "Type of transfer or discharge" box, they say something else or one of the five above. He doesn't, from your description, have a DD-214 that says "Discharge" and "Honorable"; it says "SEP TO IRR ..." or somesuch and "Honorable". ] (]) 20:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


This really needs to be cleaned up. The man pulled out a shotgun in the centre of DC in 2016 and served jail time and most of the 2016 section is about his book. It's preposterous. The page should be deleted if no established editors are looking after it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
When you separate from your obligation, you do get Honorable. In fact, I recall reading that he received an honorable discharge upon going into IRR, with a discharge code stating that he was banned from re-enlistment due to some negative circumstances (misconduct over smuggling a weapon from Iraq) surrounding his initial honorable discharge. ] (]) 21:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
: ] and make edits you feel would improve the article. --] (]) 20:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
:There's also no mention of his ties to the far-right conspiracy program Info Wars.--] (]) 06:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
: {{u|Craigboy}} The issue originally addressed by the editors above seems to have already been addressed in the article. What changes are you proposing regarding ]? Just add them to the article as the other editor suggested. ] (]) 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
:What "ties"? Sounds like a weasel word. I Googled Info Wars and Adam Kokesh, but found articles about him there. The website has articles about a whole bunch of public figures, not just Kokesh. Right-wing or not, it is a news website, and being written about or interviewed by them doesn't mean he has "ties" to it. I found an interview with him so if it's necessary to mention that he has been a guest, I can do that, but it sounds like trivia.--] (]) 16:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
:I mentioned it, but another editor removed it. So I'm leaving this alone now.--] (]) 17:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
:I've added a "controversies" section. Feel free to contribute to it! ] (]) 04:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
He can't have gotten a discharge (of any character) into IRR, because when you're in IRR you're still under an obligation. He could have gotten a transfer into IRR with characterization "Honorable". (Well, there are typographical errors, but such an error is almost certainly going to be caught before the page leaves the typist's desk (hmmm, maybe with computers it wouldn't be!)) A discharge is leaving the military, a transfer is to a different part of the military. ] (]) 02:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
that's it... he was transferred to the IRR early due to some misconduct, although his characterization was listed as honorable. But while he was on IRR status, the Marines apparently had enough. In any event, the lede paragraph is accurate. ] (]) 14:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
No, it's not. It says "his original honorable discharge" when there wasn't such a thing. How about changing
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610085312/http://www.radaronline.com/features/2007/06/adam_kokesh_iraq_veterans_against_the_war_cindy_sheehan_1.php to http://radaronline.com/features/2007/06/adam_kokesh_iraq_veterans_against_the_war_cindy_sheehan_1.php
<blockquote>and is notable for wearing portions of his military uniform to anti-war protests and the attempts of the Marine Corps to effectively downgrade his original honorable discharge in response. Ultimately, the Marine Corps failed to secure the "other than honorable" discharge that was sought, with a military tribunal instead ruling that Kokesh was to receive a general discharge (under honorable conditions.)</blockquote>
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/17990389/dancing-again-at-jefferson-memorial-no-arrests
into
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/22879607/activist-kokesh-will-run-for-president-to-abolish-us-government
<blockquote>and is notable (being a member of the IRR) for wearing portions of his military uniform to anti-war protests, and the subsequent attempt of the Marine Corps to downgrade his original characterization of service, when he was transfered into the IRR, "honorable", to "other than honorable" as his final discharge characterization. Ultimately, the Marine Corps failed to secure the "other than honorable" discharge that was sought, with a military tribunal instead ruling that Kokesh was to receive a general discharge (under honorable conditions.)</blockquote>


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You change works, but is very wordy... I still contend it is correct the way it is. read the following from the LA Times:


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Marine Cpl. Adam Kokesh ''had already received an honorable discharge from active duty'' before he was photographed in March wearing fatigues – with military insignia removed – during a mock patrol with other veterans protesting the Iraq war.


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Kokesh ''received his honorable discharge after a combat tour in Iraq''. He is now in the Individual Ready Reserve, a pool of former active-duty service members in unpaid, nondrill status.


== External links modified ==
A military panel in Kansas City, Mo., will hold a hearing Monday to decide whether he should be discharged from service and, if so, with what type of discharge.


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Col. Dave Lapan, a Marine Corps spokesman, said Kokesh was under administrative review because he wore his uniform at a political event, which is prohibited. And, Lapan said, when a senior officer told Kokesh that he violated military regulations, Kokesh cursed and indicated he would not comply. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
The quote, itself, is contradictory, quoting an unknown someone saying that he had been discharged, and stating that there was to be a hearing to decide if he should be discharged (which implies that he hadn't been.)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161127215002/https://acronymjournal.com/2014/07/03/adam-kokeshs-independence-day-call-to-arms-revisited/ to https://acronymjournal.com/2014/07/03/adam-kokeshs-independence-day-call-to-arms-revisited/
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to https://www.kokesh.org/


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
It is wordy :(, I'll try again:
<blockquote>and is notable, as a member of the IRR (whose service was characterized as "Honorable" until that duty), for wearing portions of his military uniform to anti-war protests, and the subsequent attempt of the Marine Corps to downgrade the characterization of service to "other than honorable" at his final discharge. Ultimately, the Marine Corps failed to secure the "other than honorable" discharge sought, Kokesh failed to secure the "honorable discharge" he sought, with a military tribunal ruling that Kokesh was to receive a general discharge (under honorable conditions.)</blockquote>
or
<blockquote>and is notable, as a member of the IRR (whose service was characterized as "Honorable" until that duty), for wearing portions of his military uniform to anti-war protests, and the subsequent attempt of the Marine Corps to downgrade the characterization of his service to "other than honorable" at his final discharge. Ultimately, a military tribunal took the middle course, ruling that Kokesh was to receive a general discharge (under honorable conditions.)</blockquote>


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
] (]) 17:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 00:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Still think it is accurate way it is. Here's a quote from an article on this... Granted this quote is from "Truthout.org", but seems legit.


==Massive changes==
"Now that the Marine Corps is going after honorably discharged members, who are in fact civilians, for free speech rights, we are fighting back," Lebowitz said in a telephone interview Wednesday.
Context of quote was that he was "honorably" discharged from service and that the Marines were seeking to OTH him from the IRR.63.138.81.2 (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)] (]) 19:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


Hello,
As a Marine, he should know better than to listen to political activists and their lawyers telling him he'd been discharged, rather than fellow Marines telling him he'd been transferred and not discharged; he wasn't discharged, he was a member of the IRR, and all of his woes come from the consequences of that erroneous understanding (well, this set of woes.) I won't say that it was intentional on the part of those who gave him the bad advice -- they may have been ignorant of the difference and the requirements -- but they were suspiciously ready to continue encouraging him in risking what would have been an honorable discharge, in exchange for getting them publicity that would make the Corps look bad. They've got the publicity, the USMC looks like a bully, and he doesn't have the Honorable Discharge he thought that he would end up with. I see one winner and two losers. (BTW, the USMC emblem is a part of the digital cameo pattern, so you can't remove it.) ] (]) 21:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


I've made some massive changes recently, including:
I think he has done well for himself in making a career out of political activism based from this case, so crocodile tears. But again, I respectfully contend that you are wrong about the original discharge. After going back to my own records, my DD-214 upon separating from the military and going into the IRR says "honorable." That convinces me that this does occur and you are honorable after separation from your actual service since IRR, like was argued in this case, is a non-pay, non-anything status unless you are called back to duty. Unless my DD-214 is wrong, this is definitive. Perhaps he posted his records online somewhere with ss# redacted? ] (]) 21:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
* Expansion to the introduction, and mentioning he is a ] candidate
* An expansion of background on Kokesh's early life, family, and military service
* Replacing the headings in the "Activism" section to human-readable subjects rather than merely years/chronology
* More background on his high-profile ''Iraq Veterans Against The War'' protests in 2007, including resulting discipline and protests in his support
* Expansion on much of his activism (incl. the protest against the high-profile cursing ban in Middleborough)
* Expansion of positions on government, abortion and foreign policy
* Additional background about ''FREEDOM!'' and the "book bomb" in January
* "Controversies" section, which is currently thin
* Moving his bid for congress out of the "Activism" section


I've added the best ]s I can find. Please let me know if there are any problems. I would appreciate any feedback! ] (]) 01:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Service is always characterized on any transfer (or it was when I was typing them) and it's rarely anything other than "honorable", unless someone is being discharged with other than an Honorable Discharge; if you were being sent somewhere with anything else in that block it was a head's up to those who were getting you that you'd screwed up big-time but managed to stay in. Your behavior on active duty was "honorable", and it was so noted when you transferred. (And 'thank you' for serving!) If you'd gone to BUDS, say, instead of IRR, it would say "honorable" when you then left BUDS and transferred to Special Forces, and then ... until you were finally discharged, when it would again say "honorable". Unless you screwed up, and it would say something else, and you would be usually be discharged, not transferred. "Honorable" means you've kept your nose clean, so far; I did see jackets where it was not that, and people turned their lives around and got back to a string of "honorables". Character of service and type of separation are different things. ] (]) 22:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


== removing bad sources and puffery ==
== Copyright problem removed ==


This isn't a ], so I removed the excessive quotes and a lot of questionable non-RSes and self-sourcing - ] (]) 07:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). {{#if:http://www.kokeshforcongress.com/|The material was copied from: http://www.kokeshforcongress.com/.|}}{{#if:|The material was copied from: {{{url}}}.|}} Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, ''unless'' it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ] if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ] if you are.) For ], we cannot accept ] text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences'' or ''phrases''. Accordingly, the material ''may'' be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original ''or'' ] from that source. Please see our ] for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be ] from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. <!-- Template:Cclean --> <!--Signature-->] (]) 01:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:05, 18 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adam Kokesh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Military
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / North America / United States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconUnited States: Arizona Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconJournalism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Libertarianism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconInternet culture
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

  • ] The anchor (#USPP SWAT Team) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This page is acting as a promotional website for this man

This really needs to be cleaned up. The man pulled out a shotgun in the centre of DC in 2016 and served jail time and most of the 2016 section is about his book. It's preposterous. The page should be deleted if no established editors are looking after it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.24.235.14 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

WP:BEBOLD and make edits you feel would improve the article. --Weazie (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
There's also no mention of his ties to the far-right conspiracy program Info Wars.--Craigboy (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Craigboy The issue originally addressed by the editors above seems to have already been addressed in the article. What changes are you proposing regarding Info Wars? Just add them to the article as the other editor suggested. Saturnalia0 (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
What "ties"? Sounds like a weasel word. I Googled Info Wars and Adam Kokesh, but found articles about him there. The website has articles about a whole bunch of public figures, not just Kokesh. Right-wing or not, it is a news website, and being written about or interviewed by them doesn't mean he has "ties" to it. I found an interview with him so if it's necessary to mention that he has been a guest, I can do that, but it sounds like trivia.--23mason (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
I mentioned it, but another editor removed it. So I'm leaving this alone now.--23mason (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I've added a "controversies" section. Feel free to contribute to it! 84percent (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adam Kokesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Kokesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Massive changes

Hello,

I've made some massive changes recently, including:

  • Expansion to the introduction, and mentioning he is a single-issue candidate
  • An expansion of background on Kokesh's early life, family, and military service
  • Replacing the headings in the "Activism" section to human-readable subjects rather than merely years/chronology
  • More background on his high-profile Iraq Veterans Against The War protests in 2007, including resulting discipline and protests in his support
  • Expansion on much of his activism (incl. the protest against the high-profile cursing ban in Middleborough)
  • Expansion of positions on government, abortion and foreign policy
  • Additional background about FREEDOM! and the "book bomb" in January
  • "Controversies" section, which is currently thin
  • Moving his bid for congress out of the "Activism" section

I've added the best WP:RSs I can find. Please let me know if there are any problems. I would appreciate any feedback! 84percent (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

removing bad sources and puffery

This isn't a WP:BROCHURE, so I removed the excessive quotes and a lot of questionable non-RSes and self-sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Categories: