| Revision as of 17:22, 6 August 2010 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,544 edits You have been blocked from editing in enforcement of an arbitration decision. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:00, 3 October 2023 edit undoFastilyBot (talk | contribs)Bots239,264 edits BOT: Some of your contributions may require attention | ||
| (182 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| You are free to ask questions here: | |||
| {{archive banner|numeric=false|list= | |||
| ]{{·}} }} | |||
| == Welcome to the elections! == | |||
| Note: if you leave a message on my talk page, i'll reply here (and not on your talk page) | |||
| Dear Loosmark, thank you for nominating yourself as a candidate in the ]. On behalf of the coordinators, allow me to welcome you to the election and make a few suggestions to help you get set up. By now, you ought to have written your ]{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Candidates/Loosmark/Statement|<!-- exists -->| ()}}, which should be no more than 400 words and declare any alternate or former user accounts you have contributed under (or, in the case of privacy concerns, a declaration that you have disclosed them to the Arbitration Committee). Although there are no fixed guidelines for how to write a statement, note that many candidates treat this as an opportunity, in their own way, to put a cogent case as to why editors should vote for them—highlighting the strengths they would bring to the job, and convincing the community they would cope with the workload and responsibilities of being an arbitrator. | |||
| == Rider team information == | |||
| Here's a good site for year by year information on Grand Prix riders and their respective teams: | |||
| ] (]) 00:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You should at this point have your own ]{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Candidates/Loosmark/Questions|<!-- exists -->| ()}}; feel free to begin answering the questions as you please. Together, the nomination statement and questions subpage should be transcluded to ], whose ]{{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Candidates/Loosmark|<!-- exists -->| ()}} will serve as the central location for discussion of your candidacy. If you experience any difficulty setting up these pages, please follow the links in the footer below. If you need assistance, on this or any other matter (including objectionable questions or commentary by others on your candidate pages), please notify the coordinators at ]. If you have followed these instructions correctly, congratulations, you are now officially a candidate for the Arbitration Committee. Good luck! ] 12:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nazi concentration camps== | |||
| {{ACEcan|Loosmark}} | |||
| In regards to "so UNESCO's experts think the proper name should be Nazi-German but of course the wikipedia self-proclaimed experts know better. What we have here is some variation of the "Randy in Boise" phenomenon at its purest." | |||
| ===Request=== | |||
| I read a book about the Holocaust, and it explains that there is an academic dispute over whether to call things "Nazi" or "German." I would imagine that many agencies of many governments and organizations call the concentration camps by different names. ] (]) 06:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Loosmark, your disclosure on other accounts in your nomination statement currently reads "I have no alternative accounts." Could you amend this to indicate whether or not you have ever edited from another account? I am asking all candidates to ensure that their disclosures are full and categorical. Thanks, ] 13:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Do you mean another account as in from somebody's else account? Obviously no, I have only ever edited under Loosmark account. ] 14:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement warning: Your comment at ANI == | |||
| :Some editors had prior accounts which they abandoned for whatever reason. If you could just add the above claim " I have only ever edited under Loosmark account" to your nomination statement that would be perfect. Sorry for the bother, ] 14:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Loosmark, your recent comment () to ] violates Misplaced Pages conduct norms, notably ], ] and ]. You were previously of the arbitration case ], which reiterates the high standards of conduct expected of editors working in this field (]) and allows administrators to impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process (]). '''Please consider yourself warned.''' Any subsequent violation of Misplaced Pages conduct norms in this topic area may result in sanctions being imposed without further warning. Regards, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 06:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: np, i will add that to my statement. ] 14:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Accusations of racism == | |||
| :::Great, thanks Loosmark. ] 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If accusing editors if being "The anti-Polish lobby" and making "continued attacks on Polish editors" isn't accusing people of being racist, I have no idea what could be accusing people of being racist. What would you describe it as an accusation of being? ] (]) 12:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure "try to make wikipedia a nicer place for content creators by desyoping some d*ckhead admins who are here merely to play the "wikipedia game"." is entirely appropriate. May I politely request that you tone that down or remove it altogether from your statement? (For starters, arbs can't just desysop whoever they want, but calling people dickheads is not civil.) <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 17:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement warning == | |||
| : I never said the Arbs can desyop whoever they want, however if an admins starts to create trouble and drama on regular basis he needs to be deysoped. But fine, I will try to tone done my statement in accordance to the wikipedia civility standard. ] 17:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please take note of ] (). <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 17:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Questions from Lar == | ||
| Hi. Best of luck in your upcoming trial by fire. As in ] ] I have a ] I ask candidates. This year there are restrictions on the length and number of questions on the "official" page for questions, restrictions which I do not agree with, but which I will abide by. I nevertheless think my questions are important and relevant (and I am not the only person to think so, in previous years they have drawn favorable comment from many, including in at least one case indepth analysis of candidates answers to them by third parties). You are invited to answer them if you so choose. I suggest that the talk page of your questions page is a good place to put them and I will do so with your acquiescence (for example, SirFozzie's ] already has them as do the majority of other candidates). Your answers, (or non-answers should you decide not to answer them), that will be a factor in ] of your candidacy. Please let me know as soon as practical what your wish is. Thanks and best of luck. (please answer here, I'll see it, and it keeps things together better) ++]: ]/] 18:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Loosmark. Thanks for adding results tables to ] and ]. If you're planning to do any more, can you please use the WP:F1 standard car results table format, an example of which you can find at ]. I'll convert the tables in ] and ] to the standard format later today. Regards. ] (]) 02:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Nearly perfect except that for F1 car results, the "Car" column is replaced by "Team" - I've made the change. I also removed the "fastest lap" note, since the 95T didn't score any. ] (]) 22:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Again, nearly there. There was some confusion a couple of years back regarding the whole team vs. entrant policy. Using "entrant" with the full name avoids confusion and accurately represents period records. There are quite a few older tables (unfortunately one that DH pointed you to) which use the "team" formulation. However, if you check all the cars from the last two years you will see that they use "entrant". ''']]''' 12:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Oops, my bad. Sorry. ] (]) 13:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : The talk page of my questions page is fine. ] 20:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Added there. ++]: ]/] 22:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Questions and Answers == | |||
| :::::It was the official entrant name that year, as recorded in the FIA entry list and on all official results transcripts. That's what the title sponsor pays their money for, they are an official part of the team identity. Some time the whole team name changes (e.g. Arrows became Footwork, FWRC became ISO Marlboro, and so on), and sometimes it is only a portion of the name that changes. Rather than having to descend into the POV realms of "where do we draw the line" we just use the official entry name in all cases. ''']]''' 14:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for answering my questions so promptly. I was partly prompted by the work I did on the use of historical sources Franco-Mongol Alliance case, which was private at the time but was subsequently disclosed: ]. Good luck in the elections. ] (]) 21:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: I think we should use McLaren per ]. ] 14:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| ::::::::WP:CommonNane refers to article titles and casual mentions in the body text, not to statistics recorded in tables. The problem we have is that the term "team" is a relatively modern introduction into F1 in an official sense. Prior to 1980 "team" could refer to one of a number of entities, including the group of people who actually maintained the car at the race, the person or corporate entity that held the entrant's licence, the person who actually paid for the entry into the race, the manufacturer of the car, and so on. Even since 1980 we have had "teams" changing identity and flying under flags of convenience as sponsorship money ebbed and flowed. For example, you can certainly argue that Layton House was actually the March "team" underneath the island blue paint, and that Footwork was Arrows all along, but it depends how you interpret the concept of a "team". In addition, some "teams" actually changed identity over a period of time; where would you draw the line between Frank Williams Racing Cars and Walter Wolf Racing? Anything that is open to interpretation and a non-neutral POV inherently becomes tricky to deal with in WP. Entrant is an unambiguous and officially recorded fact. Using that also allows us to accurately reflect how the cars were run in period. It is because of this complexity that we also use "entrant" as the field in the driver results tables. ''']]''' 16:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 21:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| ] Hello Loosmark! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: | |||
| : Please also see ]. ] ] 21:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Karina Szczepkowska-Horowska}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 09:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|''I have not abused multiple account. I request who "informed" the checkusers about alleged "irregularities" in my editing is disclosed.''|decline=Checkuser evidence very conclusively shows that you have used several dozen accounts. In addition to the technical evidence, the concerns we were presented with brought to light a number of behavioral similarities, which we felt were unusual enough to merit a closer investigation. As for who brought this to our attention, that is not relevant to any appeal, nor is there any reason you should be told. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 22:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
| :]. That is a lot of sockpuppets. In what way do you think that operating that many accounts is not an abuse of ] What is the legitimate reason that you think you have for using so many accounts? -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 22:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
=== One year === | ||
| Loosmark, I have blocked your account for a full year as a matter of ] under ] discretionary sanctions. You've been socking to evade a six month topic ban. The matter is further compounded by deception in the candidate statement where you did not declare any of ]. So we have ], ] and ] violations of a very serious nature. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I assume you feel that the ] is high due to Royal Coronations. | |||
| :He's got enough blocks for a ] report if someone cares to file one for his IP. <span style="color: #990000;"><strong><em>] <sup>]</sup></em></strong></span> 22:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ban == | |||
| I also wonder about ] which holds the sarcophagus forming the tomb of two Polish rulers, ] and his son ]. | |||
| Loosmark, there has been a consensus at for a ]. This means you cannot edit on en.WP under any account without the consent of the community or arbcom. Moreover, you have been blocked for one year, owing to the wildly over the top ] you ran in a sanctioned topic area (whilst standing for this year's arbcom election so less). After one year has gone by, if you don't try to edit here or cause any other disruption on Misplaced Pages, the ] may be open to you. ] (]) 09:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Then again ] is the largest cathedral in Poland. | |||
| : Ok. I will respect the decision of the community, and will not edit wikipedia anymore. I apology to everybody and ask that somebody puts that tag "retired" here. ] 11:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] is Poland's largest church and one of the largest churches in the world. | |||
| :: No, you do not get {{tl|retired}}, you got {{tl|Banned user}} && {{tl|sockpuppeteer}}. ] 19:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == The Doing nothing wrong award == | |||
| I had a look at various pages especially ]. ] should be High. I would support any of the other three listed above being High and all the rest being mid importance. ] (]) 14:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| == ] == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''You did nothing wrong''' | |||
| There has been a new and expanded preferential poll created on ] similar to the recent Ireland poll. The votes from the previous poll could unfortunately not be transferred over to the new system and you may need to recast your vote. I apologise for the inconvenience. —] 04:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == F1 car articles == | |||
| Hey, I notice you're creating articles about F1 cars from the 80s. If you ever need any help with any of those, please let me know, I'm a huge F1 geek and would love to assist in any way I can. Keep up the good work! <span style="color:green;background:green">X</span><span style="color:white;background:white">X</span><span style="color:red;background:red">X</span> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 09:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Revert restrictions == | |||
| Please note that I have reported you for what I consider to be a breach of your revert restrictions. ] (]) 10:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Peace of Riga Caricature== | |||
| Loosmark, this is the actual caption on the cartoon in Belarusian: Беларуская: Карыкатура: "Далоў ганебны рыжскі падзел! Ніхай жыве вольная непадзельная селянская Беларусь!" ] (]) 03:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :"Precz z haniebnym rozbiorze Rydze! Niech żyje wolna narodowy niepodzielne Białoruś!" p.s. Concerning your other "small correction", some of the Soviet leadership wanted to export the revolution and some of them wanted to consolidate the revolution in Russia. ] (]) 05:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Made an adjustment at the ] article concerning "some/most" to many. As for the caricature, the caption is self-explanatory. Please note, that I didn't "note" the Pole's resemblance to Pilsudski, or the ghoulish long, pointed, nails that both parties are using to dig into Belarus. ] (]) 15:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Nomination of German-Japanese relations== | |||
| Hi there. Over the past weeks I majorly expanded the article on ] and really need people to go scan my contributions. I want to set a high quality standard since I'd love to have it featured some day. I'd really appreciate your participation on its nomination for a Good Article at ]. Thanks in advance! --] (]) 11:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Chełm == | |||
| Thank you, ], for your swift and helpful ] with the population of ] in 1939. I'll certainly add that to the page under the section heading ''']'''. Meanwhile, while I lack access to library resources, my "City or town?" nomenclature query remains open. Might you shed some insight based on the content of the ] (since I don't read ])? ''--With appreciation, ] (]) 11:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)'' | |||
| == World Series by Renault == | |||
| As you quote, "The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." Please familiarize yourself with ] and stop attacking people for improving wikipedia. ] (]) 18:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 20:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Final discussion for ] == | |||
| Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of ] | |||
| As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered: | |||
| # ] | |||
| #] | |||
| Your opinion on this is welcome. ] 02:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == 3o note == | |||
| == Just a reminder == | |||
| that it's generally best to DFT.] (]) 12:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Nationalisms and antisemitisms== | |||
| I'm writing this here because this discussion probably isn't appropriate for the article's talk page. I do understand the irony that while Polish nationalism included antisemtism at its core while Ukrainian did not, Ukrainian nationalists killed more Jews than Polish nationalists did. The reason was historical - Ukrainian nationalists for time worked for the Germans while Polish ones did not. Let me make an analogy: if the price for Poland to be free of both Nazis and Soviets were to hand over all Polish gypsies to Romania for extermination, would that be proof that Polish nationalists were anti-gypsy if they agreed to do so? No, it would mean that they were immoral and ruthless and willing to do twerribel things for the sake of their goal but '''not''' that anti-gypsy beliefs were a core aspect of their ideology. Similarly, the OUN's participation in crimes against Jews does not prove that their movement had antisemitism at its core. It only proves that they were immoral and ruthless and willing to do terrible things for the ake of their goal. I hope that clarifies what Himka and others were trying to say when they documented Ukrainian nationalist crimes.] (]) 14:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> | |||
| {{Quote box | |||
| | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].''''' | |||
| | source = Thank you. | |||
| | width = 20% | |||
| | align = right | |||
| }} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the ]. | |||
| If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> ] (] and ]) 15:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == West Germany == | |||
| Still on your warpath, Loosmark? Trying to make believe the country I was born in, and still live in, does not exist anymore since 1990? Thank you for illustrating the stupidity of the name "]", and of those who are fond of it. You are still stalking me, trying to provoke me, as recommend by your Polish buddies on the EEML. Better retire also the not-semi-retired half. -- ] ] 22:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Ethnomusicology revisited == | |||
| Perhaps you remember our earlier discussion concerning ] and I was wondering if you cared to delve into this subject a little further with me. Whereas the subject is of interest to me, it may not be so to you. Please let me know if you care to discuss it. Thanks. ] (]) 23:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your contributed article, ]== | |||
| ] Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ''']'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - ''']'''. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for ]. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at ] - you might like to discuss new information at ]. | |||
| If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the ] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 14:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your contributed article, ]== | |||
| ] Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ''']'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - ''']'''. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for ]. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at ] - you might like to discuss new information at ]. | |||
| If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the ] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 14:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your contributed article, ]== | |||
| ] Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ''']'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - ''']'''. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for ]. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at ] - you might like to discuss new information at ]. | |||
| If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the ] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 14:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your contributed article, ]== | |||
| ] Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ''']'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - ''']'''. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for ]. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at ] - you might like to discuss new information at ]. | |||
| If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the ] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 14:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Avoiding speedy deletions and AfDs== | |||
| Loosmark, you may wish to consider creating a personal sandbox. You can work an article up there and get it into reasonable shape in peace. When it is ready you can simply copy/paste the sandbox article into the new title. A well developed article is much less likely to get a CSD tag, and should probably escape an AfD too. ] (]) 18:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, but once released into mainspace, other editors <s>can rip the article to shreds too</s> have a chance to expand and improve the article, correct any minor errors and typos etc. The better developed an article is when released the less chance of a CSD or AfD. ] (]) 18:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Stubs == | |||
| I shall henceforth think of you as "Stubmonster". Misplaced Pages is an ], not a ]. ''']]''' 01:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == F1 car articles == | |||
| Hi Loosmark. I have started ] about "stubby" F1 car articles, of which you have created several recently. I invite you to participate in the discussion. Regards. ] (]) 06:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == It's your decision == | |||
| and its perfectly understandable but... | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Integrity''' | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; |
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | you did nothing wrong ] (]) 10:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ^that was one of your socks, LOL! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Unblock request == | |||
| I hope you come back. There is a lot of uncontroversial, stress-free articles to edit. As I said earlier, your help with ] (and the abysmal ]), for example, would be much appreciated. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == NIce to see you back == | |||
| Do not pay attention to the harassment of some users, and the outrageous treatment of the administrator. I see what is going on here but I'm sure one day they will pay for it. Stay cool and just have fun. Best.--] 05:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, Loosmark. Because you participated in ], you may be interested in ]. ] (]) 02:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talkback|Varsovian}} | |||
| == A New Issue == | |||
| I wanted to let you know I am largely in agreement with your remarks here , not completely mind you, but I do believe our frequently at odds interaction does improve Misplaced Pages. Some of us go back a long way on these talk pages, and we do not need outside referees who haven't the foggiest idea about the history and culture of many of the subjects we are dealing with. Same goes for inside referees. Sometimes they over do it. Furthermore, I have a thick enough skin to handle a jab or two from everyone who throws one my way. Which is why I have always decried any form of censorship at this project. When someone has a POV that disagrees with my own, I have several ways to handle it. Ignore it, laugh it off, or debate it and try to change that other person's POV. But by no means try to censor it. Truthfully, Kotniski removing everyone's comments at the thread going on at the Chopin talk page really stunk. It's way too pompous that he should take upon himself the role of wise old ] or referee and thereby rescue the project from you or from me. Believe me, some of our mutual interaction and commentary is wimpy and mild, compared to the fireworks I've read elsewhere on the Misplaced Pages talk pages. If Kotniski is unhappy with some of the goings on at a particular thread at a talk page, he can move on to another thread or another talk page. His actions were completely unwarranted and would set a very bad precedent in our neck of the woods if they are allowed to go unchallenged. ] (]) 01:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy Loosmark's Day!== | |||
| {| style="border: 2px ridge #4682B4; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: #EAF5FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 8px; text-align: center;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 10px; font-family: Comic Sans MS, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;"| | |||
| ''']''' has been identified as an '''''Awesome Wikipedian''''',<br /> | |||
| and therefore, I've officially declared today as ]!<br /> | |||
| For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,<br /> | |||
| enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Loosmark! | |||
| Peace,<br />]<br />00:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <small>A record of your Day will always be kept ].</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see ] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 00:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :PS care to archive some of your talk page?<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 00:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Given your post on my talk, I've set up a system for you. Let me know if you would like it modified. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 01:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Please self revert ASAP == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Anti-Polish_sentiment|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please self revert ASAP to avoid being reported. Thanks {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->-- ] (]) 21:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nordschliefe Lap times == | |||
| Thanks for the heads up. | |||
| As a matter of interest if it were any other cicuit I'd probably agree with you. Take for instance Brands Hatch which is near me as a comparison. Both ciruits have had a similar number of grand prix, have equally long histories and so on. I have never once seen Brands Hatch used as a yardstick for car performance though, whereas that happens all the time now for the ring, thus I wouldnt consider a need for an article on Brands times. Like 0-60 and top speed the ring laptime for cars is being used as a yardstick by which performance of a car is measured and compared and for promotional purposes by the motoring media and car manufacturers. As recent examples from Ferrari and from Pistonheads gives you some idea how much weight manufacturers and media respectively give to Ring times. Bear in mind of course that those are just 2 examples from the last couple of weeks, the actual weight of references to ring times now by motoring manufacturers and motoring media is overwhelming. --] (]) 13:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree to a great extent about the PR. Much of it is simple PR. But the very fact they are using it as a PR means it is notable. The general rule for times is that the car is unmodified (excepting safety gear and timing equipment) and road legal. Some manufacturers such as Radical emphasize legality by driving their cars to and from the track when setting times, others such as Ferrari with the 599xx will note obtusely that the care was not road legal. Most look to add weight to their claims by having their cars and times independantly verified by independant observers such as Sport Auto or Evo. For most times it is pretty safe to ignore track conditions as no manufacturer or press will try and set a time in less than ideal conditions as a) they wont set a decent time and b) they are likely to crash trying. What prevents them doctoring their cars? Further independant testing. If a manufacturer claims to have done a 7 minute lap and no independant tester can get round in under 8 in obstensibly the same car they will get a lot of bad press. Questions about such a doctoring were raised about the Nissan GTR for example. As ever manufacters claims vary much more in their reliability than independant tests. Furthermore many tests are standardised as much as possible by testers such as Sport Auto. In all cases of course manufacturers claims are noted as such and indepnedantly verified times are noted as such. While I certainly agree that not all times are directly comparable that in no way deflects from the notability of the subject. --] (]) 14:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well best of luck with an AFD then. You'll need it. --] (]) 14:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == AE filing == | |||
| Hi, I've made an AE filing which mentions you in passing, here: Thanks, -] (]) 01:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Other AE filing== | |||
| I was a little disheartened by your participation here. As a result of your comments made at the AE request, I feel the need to ask you a question or two. I'd like to do so here on your talk page, but I thought I'd ask your permission first. You might be busy with other things or prefer not to bother yourself with this request. Up to you. Thanks. ] (]) 19:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : You are free to ask of course. ] 20:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I was a little busy getting my boat up north out of Chicago (couldn't decide whether to go to ] or ]), plus the ] took up some of my time. ] Then you too have been busy here and here . Anyway, as I mentioned I was a little disheartened by your participation here. As a result of your comments made at the AE request I wanted to explain to you that I'm truly at a disadvantage at these proceedings. The main reason for that is that I find them to be childish and a waste of time. There are enough mind games played at the talk pages of some of the articles that we interact at (sometimes agreeing, sometimes disagreeing), that the last last thing I need to do is run to some forum and look for some type of succor to assuage my bruised ego. I have a thicker skin than that. I do not plan to file this type of complaint now or in the future. Which is why I'm placed in a disadvantage. I simply do not believe in the suppression of free speech, free thought, or a frank expression of ones beliefs. I do draw the line at a bona fide personal attack (especially one that is obscene), but I'll leave it to you or others to make that call and run to ArbCom when you feel that it is paramount to do so. I'd be interested in your viewpoint concerning the matter. Thanks. ] (]) 02:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I am not quite sure what exactly are you asking me about. My comments were a reply to another user who made some not accurate comment(s). In general I'd say that I am in favor of free speech. ] 20:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm back more or less. Not totally (I should have named my boat, "''Endless Summer''", and left it up north in Wisconsin), but I have some responsibilities that require occasional attention back home. What puzzles me is your uncertainty about what I'm asking you about. While it's good to know that "in general" you say you're in favor of free speech, don't you think your remark at my AE is strange, particularly "''I find it interesting that Skapperod, Varsovian and Deacon of Pndapetzim, all known for countless disputes with Polish editors in the past, all came here trying to get Dan off the hook...''"? Yet, somehow you don't find your perennial appearances, taking sides, at such venues to be unusual, let alone "interesting". Somehow your voice is silent, and non-existent when personal attacks are made against people that you have had disagreements with. What's up with that? ] (]) 01:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Still hoping for a response. ] (]) 23:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Response to what exactly? As you can probably guess I disagree with how you described the situation. Let's just say that if somebody will ever call you "a disgraced user" be sure that my voice won't be silent and I will take your defense. Although come to think of it, your voice was always silent when personal attacks were made against myself a couple of months ago. But I am sure you wanted to make your voice heard, only that you were to busy sailing your private yacht or flying your private jet. ] 23:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::No private jet. Please calm down. Response to what? How about this ? While you obviously cannot control what is placed on your talk page, maybe you should ask yourself why this ] thought that you were a receptive candidate to hear his opinion about me, that I was a "f-----g troll", etc. Better still, why didn't you object or ask that person not to post such garbage on your talk page? Hmm? Regarding the personal attacks against yourself, were they posted on my talk page? Believe me, I would have objected. In fact, I would have objected very strongly. ] (]) 23:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: May I ask why did you write "please calm down"? I am very calm (I have just finished playing a beautiful Chopin sonata awhile ago.) Btw the diff you post above is from March, which is more than 3 months ago. To answer your question: I don't remember why. Btw, as much as I like to continue this conversation I am afraid that we can't continue because ] kicks in. Have a nice day and happy editing. ] 00:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sorry to pursue this, but I asked you to calm down because your snide remark concerning yachts and jets made me think you were agitated by my good fortune. If I was mistaken, my apologies, but not for my good fortune. As for my remarks that brought on the AE, well, they were judged to be uncivil, but I dare say not untrue. Was thinking about contacting ] through a ] for a third opinion concerning their incivility. Didn't know you could play Chopin (perhaps it was on a ]), I also play Chopin, but on one of my three pianos. Hopefully it wasn't a mistake on my part and you can also play Chopin on the piano, and that you play very well. When Chopin is played poorly, it becomes very comical. Therefore I wonder if "I listened to a beautiful Chopin snota" would have been more appropriate than your stating that you "finished playing a beautiful Chopin sonata". Probably it's not the same as your recently obtaining a ], but you still never did tell me what your degree was in. As for the three month old difference, it is a long time ago and that sufficiently explains why you "don't remember". Have a nice day and happy editing as well. ] (]) 02:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Dan thanks for correcting the above message and providing a link to the CD. I was wondering what a CD is. I am a bit surprised that an advanced pianist like you only have three pianos, I have four of them and I am far from being an advanced pianist like you are, really. ] 18:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Oh my God, I have just noticed that you changed the template from "advanced pianist" to "intermediate pianist". What happened!? Aren't you an advanced pianist anymore? In my opinion you are just being too humble really, I am pretty sure that you are still an advanced pianist. ] 18:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::You're right, so I've changed the template back to "advanced". I was so disappointed with my rendition of a difficult Liszt piece that I did change the template down a notch. I've since mastered the piece. Btw, congratulations on having four pianos. Now the only thing I'd still like to know is what your doctorate is in and who conferred it on you? ] (]) 19:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: Dan, I think I have already said that I don't want to boast with my academic achievements. I don't want any favors. And besides Misplaced Pages is an egalitarian community where we are all equal, a guy with 5, 6 titles or a taxi driver / cleaning women, it doesn't matter. It's the value of contributions that counts. Or as our founder mr.Wales put it: the Encyclopedia that everybody can edit. Now I am really concerned that the Admins won't like this discussion because again ]. Let's go to improve the project, ok? ] 19:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| (OD) I'm not asking you to boast about your academic achievements, Loosmark. And I also agree that Misplaced Pages should be an egalitarian community. Which is why I get a laugh out of people who believe that they're descended from the ], even though they're not, or ] different ] on their user pages. If you happen to be a cleaning woman or a taxi driver doesn't matter to me. If you want to add ] to your user name is also O.K. with me, even if you are are taxi driver or a cleaning woman. I was simply curious if you indeed had doctorate in something. That's all. A simple friendly question which you continually rebuff and evade. As you wish. More importantly, I think it's more telling that your memory concerning my piano skills is somehow better than your memory concerning obscene personal attacks against me on your own user talk page and not reporting them or objecting to them. Strangely you have a lapse of memory here and say "I don't remember why" and that the "diff" was "more than 3 months ago". Well, both posts (the obscene one and the piano template) were in March and only a day apart. That discrepancy, and related comments by you concern me much more than whether "the Admins" won't like this discussion because again ] (sic)". Personally I doubt that "the Admins" really give a hoot about our present interaction here. We're still not being watched by the ] or someone else from "Oceania", are we? Besides, if you remember, I began this thread with asking your permission to delve into your participation at my AE, and related matters. I think you've explained yourself sufficiently to me and anyone else who's interested. Thank you for the many occasions when you have complemented me and expressed your solidarity with my contributions to the project. I'm also glad you're an exopedian. I'm going sailing for a while. Best wishes. ] (]) 02:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Who are these people with ] on their user pages? I have not noticed anybody with that and I am really curious how does that look like. Maybe I will get a laugh out of it too!? Please show me the user page in question. Thanks for being "O.K" with the "doctor" in my user name (it goes without saying that you having "doctor" in yours is very fine with me too). Thanks also for the in-depth analysis of the "discrepancy" in my memory from more than 3 months ago. Speaking of memory discrepancies, I have found one of my own: somewhere above you wrote, quote: ''"Regarding the personal attacks against yourself, were they posted on my talk page? Believe me, I would have objected. In fact, I would have objected very strongly."'' Seems there was a lapse in your memory because a personal attacks against myself was indeed posted on your talk page: I am now searching for your objections pardon very strong objections. uh I can't find them. where did you object Dan? ah doesn't matter probably you were busy and just didn't notice.. but now I am curious who made the attack... oh my god. IT WAS YOU! ] 20:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| For helping out with ]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 18:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I, too, appreciate your help. {{=)}} — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 20:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == You are now a Reviewer == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer<tt>" userright, allowing you to ] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a ] at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). | |||
| Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. | |||
| When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious ] or ], and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see ]). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found ]. | |||
| If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> ] (]) 22:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-retired == | |||
| You may want to add {{tl|Semi-retired}} to your userpage. Or, I'd hope, remove the note entirely and come back to full editing :) --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 20:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Wielbark == | |||
| Loosmark, would you please take a look at a map and realize that Wielbark wasn't part of ] but of ], which was already part of the ] since 1701. Thanks ] (]) 17:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Any map you like (or a history book). ] (]) 17:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ugh == | |||
| That was a heartbreaker though (and yes I was cheering for Ghana).] (]) 21:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : hehehe. before the World Cup i made a bet with some friends and believe it or not i put some money on Uruguay to win it. Suarez for president :P ] 22:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == village names == | |||
| You mass reverted several (German) names of villages in the ]. It is a common practise to mention these historical names (see also ]). Please restore my edits, otherwise your reverts might be considered ]. Thanks ] (]) 16:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :a) You removed not only the post 1938 names but all historic names. | |||
| :b) In several cases names were already changed in 1900 (e.g.:]), unlikely a Nazi action. | |||
| :c) the years 1938-45 are unfortunately part of the history of this area and concealment is not the way to deal with it, do we agree on that? ] (]) 17:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please check=== | |||
| --] (]) 13:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why did you reverted my edition to the page? What was the real reason? The page carries for whatever reasons Polish alphabet. How does such page can be readable for English-speaking people? ] (]) 20:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I don't know "how does such page can be readable for English-people". Probably not much less than ], ] or ] or any other of the millions of pages which use some non-English letters. And no offense, but given the less that perfect level of English you demonstrated above I am not quite sure you are the right person to make such observations anyway. ] 21:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK nomination of ORP Rybitwa== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|ORP Rybitwa|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 20:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==RE:Swastika== | |||
| I find your comment hilariously ironic when contrasted with the Winston Churchill quote on your user page. | |||
| Also, the entirety of East Asia resents your allegation that they are uncivilized. --] <small>]</small> 23:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I have never said that East Asia are uncivilized and neither do they use the '''Nazi swastika''' which is what I meant obviously. ] 23:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then which countries, praytell, ''were'' you excluding from the civilized world in order to make the statement that the swastika is "banned in most civilized countries"? I invite you to educate yourself on this subject by reading ]. The swastika is not illegal, particularly in educational contexts, anywhere in the world but a handful of nations. --] <small>]</small> 23:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: What exactly is educational in having a stub template with the swastika pray tell? It's just way to spread the symbol all over. ] 23:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::]. The inclusion of the image imparts information to the viewer in a way plain text would not. --] <small>]</small> 23:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Do you honestly think the goal of wikipedia is to spread Nazi iconography all over the place? ] (]) 06:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Kołobrzeg == | |||
| *''Kołobrzeg: zarys dziejów'' Tadeusz Gasztold, Hieronim Kroczyński 1979 | |||
| *''Dzieje ziemi kołobrzeskiej do czasów jej germanizacji'' Kazimierz Ślaski - 1948 | |||
| *''Kołobrzeg - przeszłość, teraźniejszość, przyszłość'' / red. nauk. Edward Wiśniewski. 2005 | |||
| *''Kołobrzeg : wczesne miasto nad Bałtykiem'' pod red. Lecha Leciejewicza i Mariana Rębkowskiego 2005 | |||
| Some of books available about Kołobrzeg. I agree that the article needs to be re-written. --] (]) 12:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for ORP Rybitwa== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |tyle = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (]) 06:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: == | |||
| ] is absolutely clear: ''The title can be followed in the first line by a list of alternative names in parentheses: {name1, name2, name3, etc.}.'' I'm just following the WP guidelines. ] (]) 08:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|decline=I've blocked the account that posted this for block evasion; that's a rotten way to try to get unblocked here ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)|reason=I am sorry for the trouble I caused Misplaced Pages and I only hope you can forgive me over these 8 long years | |||
| :Please stay ], The names of 1938 are the official names in Germany, anybody born in that area between 1938 and 1945 will find that name in all of his official documents. ] (]) 08:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| singed Loosmark}} | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Polish Radio Stations before WW2 == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==ARBCOM == | |||
| ::A discussion is senseless if you don't realize the difference between these villages in ] and Lodz, sorry. ] (]) 08:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the ] and the ] may be of use. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 22:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==1999 Motorcycle Grand Prix season== | |||
| Thanks for your help on the Motorcycle Grand Prix seasons. Can you also edit the 250cc class in order to have the 500cc and 250cc tables the same? In the current format, the article appears half completed.] (]) 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| == Assume good faith == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Please, stop it: I said twice that I'm not a "fanboy" of ], don't repeat this allegation. Anyway, as a sidenote, I'm from Milan, but there are not many "Castello Sforzesco fanboys" (actually there aren't at all) because the castle is (among other things) a symbol of Spanish occupation. --] 08:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''There is another, better article for this bike, ]'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Hello Dr. Loosmark. Do you think it's possible to expand ] for ]? It's currently 583 characters (blockquotes don't count for DYK), and it would need to be at least 1500 to qualify for DYK. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 23:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| : I think so. Somehow I still haven't found the time to give it a go. ] 23:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| '''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2010 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' for a period of '''55 hours''' from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Latest revision as of 10:00, 3 October 2023
You are free to ask questions here:
Welcome to the elections!
Dear Loosmark, thank you for nominating yourself as a candidate in the 2010 Arbitration Committee elections. On behalf of the coordinators, allow me to welcome you to the election and make a few suggestions to help you get set up. By now, you ought to have written your nomination statement, which should be no more than 400 words and declare any alternate or former user accounts you have contributed under (or, in the case of privacy concerns, a declaration that you have disclosed them to the Arbitration Committee). Although there are no fixed guidelines for how to write a statement, note that many candidates treat this as an opportunity, in their own way, to put a cogent case as to why editors should vote for them—highlighting the strengths they would bring to the job, and convincing the community they would cope with the workload and responsibilities of being an arbitrator.
You should at this point have your own questions subpage; feel free to begin answering the questions as you please. Together, the nomination statement and questions subpage should be transcluded to your candidate profile, whose talkpage will serve as the central location for discussion of your candidacy. If you experience any difficulty setting up these pages, please follow the links in the footer below. If you need assistance, on this or any other matter (including objectionable questions or commentary by others on your candidate pages), please notify the coordinators at their talkpage. If you have followed these instructions correctly, congratulations, you are now officially a candidate for the Arbitration Committee. Good luck! Skomorokh 12:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 | Arbitration Committee Election 2019 candidate: Loosmark
|
Request
Loosmark, your disclosure on other accounts in your nomination statement currently reads "I have no alternative accounts." Could you amend this to indicate whether or not you have ever edited from another account? I am asking all candidates to ensure that their disclosures are full and categorical. Thanks, Skomorokh 13:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Do you mean another account as in from somebody's else account? Obviously no, I have only ever edited under Loosmark account. Dr. Loosmark 14:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Some editors had prior accounts which they abandoned for whatever reason. If you could just add the above claim " I have only ever edited under Loosmark account" to your nomination statement that would be perfect. Sorry for the bother, Skomorokh 14:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- np, i will add that to my statement. Dr. Loosmark 14:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Great, thanks Loosmark. Skomorokh 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure "try to make wikipedia a nicer place for content creators by desyoping some d*ckhead admins who are here merely to play the "wikipedia game"." is entirely appropriate. May I politely request that you tone that down or remove it altogether from your statement? (For starters, arbs can't just desysop whoever they want, but calling people dickheads is not civil.) /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I never said the Arbs can desyop whoever they want, however if an admins starts to create trouble and drama on regular basis he needs to be deysoped. But fine, I will try to tone done my statement in accordance to the wikipedia civility standard. Dr. Loosmark 17:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Questions from Lar
Hi. Best of luck in your upcoming trial by fire. As in previous years I have a series of questions I ask candidates. This year there are restrictions on the length and number of questions on the "official" page for questions, restrictions which I do not agree with, but which I will abide by. I nevertheless think my questions are important and relevant (and I am not the only person to think so, in previous years they have drawn favorable comment from many, including in at least one case indepth analysis of candidates answers to them by third parties). You are invited to answer them if you so choose. I suggest that the talk page of your questions page is a good place to put them and I will do so with your acquiescence (for example, SirFozzie's page already has them as do the majority of other candidates). Your answers, (or non-answers should you decide not to answer them), that will be a factor in my evaluation of your candidacy. Please let me know as soon as practical what your wish is. Thanks and best of luck. (please answer here, I'll see it, and it keeps things together better) ++Lar: t/c 18:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- The talk page of my questions page is fine. Dr. Loosmark 20:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Added there. ++Lar: t/c 22:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Questions and Answers
Thank you for answering my questions so promptly. I was partly prompted by the work I did on the use of historical sources Franco-Mongol Alliance case, which was private at the time but was subsequently disclosed: Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance#Report on use of sources. Good luck in the elections. Sam Blacketer (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Avi (talk) 21:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please also see WP:AN#Ban discussion: Loosmark and sockpuppeting. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Loosmark (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not abused multiple account. I request who "informed" the checkusers about alleged "irregularities" in my editing is disclosed.
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence very conclusively shows that you have used several dozen accounts. In addition to the technical evidence, the concerns we were presented with brought to light a number of behavioral similarities, which we felt were unusual enough to merit a closer investigation. As for who brought this to our attention, that is not relevant to any appeal, nor is there any reason you should be told. Hersfold 22:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Here is the list. That is a lot of sockpuppets. In what way do you think that operating that many accounts is not an abuse of multiple accounts? What is the legitimate reason that you think you have for using so many accounts? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
One year
Loosmark, I have blocked your account for a full year as a matter of arbitration enforcement under WP:DIGWUREN discretionary sanctions. You've been socking to evade a six month topic ban. The matter is further compounded by deception in the candidate statement where you did not declare any of these 40+ socks. So we have WP:SOCK, WP:DIGWUREN and WP:GAME violations of a very serious nature. Jehochman 22:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- He's got enough blocks for a WP:ABUSE report if someone cares to file one for his IP. AndrewN 22:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
ban
Loosmark, there has been a consensus at AN for a community ban. This means you cannot edit on en.WP under any account without the consent of the community or arbcom. Moreover, you have been blocked for one year, owing to the wildly over the top sock farm you ran in a sanctioned topic area (whilst standing for this year's arbcom election so less). After one year has gone by, if you don't try to edit here or cause any other disruption on Misplaced Pages, the standard offer may be open to you. Gwen Gale (talk) 09:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. I will respect the decision of the community, and will not edit wikipedia anymore. I apology to everybody and ask that somebody puts that tag "retired" here. Dr. Loosmark 11:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, you do not get {{retired}}, you got {{Banned user}} && {{sockpuppeteer}}. Jack Merridew 19:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
The Doing nothing wrong award
|
You did nothing wrong |
| you did nothing wrong Drowningseagull (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC) |
^that was one of your socks, LOL! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.9.165 (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Unblock request
Loosmark (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for the trouble I caused Misplaced Pages and I only hope you can forgive me over these 8 long years singed Loosmark
Decline reason:
I've blocked the account that posted this for block evasion; that's a rotten way to try to get unblocked here --jpgordon 20:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Polish Radio Stations before WW2
Template:Polish Radio Stations before WW2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (/What I been doing) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
ARBCOM
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Holocaust in Poland and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Icewhiz (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Honda RS125
The article Honda RS125 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is another, better article for this bike, Honda RS125R
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)