User talk:MUCHERS22: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:17, 7 August 2010 editFences and windows (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators50,401 edits →Notice of Arbitration Committee enforcement: new section← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 10:25, 7 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(34 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== FYI ==
	==]==
	I've helped you by opening a discussion of whether your desired changes would make the article better, on the article's You should feel free to participate in the conversation with your reasons. Once consensus is clear, you won't have to repeatedly revert others' edits. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 19:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

			] --'']] ]'' 23:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

			== December 2010 ==
	Thanks for reaching back. I appreciate it.
			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for constant and seemingly habitual ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] \| ] 04:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Hey Im sorry for the reverting, I tried to reach out to the person who kept deleting my adds without fair reason but I never got anything back from him. But like I said Im sorry for breaching the rules and it wont happen again, I will use the discussion page in such conflicts, if I get unblocked. I find the block unecessarry since I was just ignorant enough not to pay attention to the warning I got (from another editor) !. MUCHERS22 (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC) \| decline=You have six prior blocks for edit-warring. Because you did not stop edit-warring after these six blocks, I do not believe you that you will stop if this seventh block is lifted. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}
	==Your recent edits==
	] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 07:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Well like I said I am truly sorry for what I did and that I didnt pay enough attention, I tried to reach out to the editor too but he ignored my call, what should I have done i such a position? The people deleting my stuff did it just out of spite and no reason, just look for yourself which reason they used. Yes I have been blocked before but I have finally learned my lesson, it took 6 times, for some it may just take 1. If there isnt a single way for me to get back, please remove my user then. MUCHERS22 (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC) \| decline=6 blocks for the same reason shows me that you're not able to learn. That said, ] exists - in order to make use of this, I recommend you go to a different Wikimedia project and start editing ''properly''. When you return in June, show us that you now understand the policies. As you already should know, your userid can never be deleted. (]<span style="border:1px solid red;">''' ] '''</span>]) 14:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}
	==Your recent edits==
	] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 12:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed\|reason=Again for the third time, let me know how I should have handle the conclict that ended up in six mounth ban? I reached out to the user who kept deleting my stuff (which was also without fair reason), but he ignored it. What should I have done? Please tell me because I am probably going to go in to that trap over and over, and you can see my earlier discussions on the Admin message board, I was never given a fair reason on the earlier blocks neither. No wonder I do the same misstakes.
	== Stop edit warring ==
			Giving me a ban for six mounths without telling me the reason is vulgar, I guess you rather find my political views contradicting with yours, just like the previous ban. Also like I said, some learn after 1 time someone learn after 10 times, thats relative. But hey, sure ban me 6 mounth or 6 years, why would I care? In such case I will only use another IP and I will be back with another username. Problem solved. ] (]) 15:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)\|decline=Stop being disingenuous. You were repeatedly warned; anyone can look at the history of this page and see just how many times you received warnings and simply blanked them, neither responding to them nor modifying your behavior. If you come back under another username, and continue the same behavior, the exact same result will ensue; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of your edits - just your flawed approach to editing Misplaced Pages. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}

			<nowiki>{{unblock\|reason=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been told i what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban)? You have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action? ] (]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}
	Stop edit warring ] otherwise you will be blocked.--] (]) 17:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
			</nowiki>

			: There's no punishment being meted out - this is all about prevention. In every warning you ever received about ] or ], you were advised about ]. You were even made aware of the correct noticeboard when others violate 3RR. You were even made aware of how to request page protection. Because you continually failed to heed those very nice pieces of advice, then continued to blatantly break the ] again and again, we have to protect this project. Beware: your continued disingenuous unblock requests will soon result in removal of your access to this page: as already noted, if you try to ] this block, your ] may be blocked on sight. (]<span style="border:1px solid red;">''' ] '''</span>]) 16:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
	Stop editing? What are you talking about? Stop vandalize and constantly try to hide the facts. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be objective. If you are an admin or mod you should know this so what the deal? Whats the problem? The political issue or a source issue?

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Again you fail to tell me which rules I have broken, I reached out to the people who deleted my stuff without plausible reason, when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that? Its just ridiculous. Keep coming with your threats of cutting me off forever, that just proves my point. Another nick will just be created ad finitum. MUCHERS22 (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC) \| decline= "when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that?" Because that is ], about which you have been warned very many times. Your asking this question shows that you still do not understand why you are blocked. Because you also threaten to evade your block, your talk page access is hereby removed for continuing to make clearly invalid unblock requests. You can appeal this block to ] per e-mail. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 16:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}
	:Never again post anything at my talk page. If you do, it will be considered harassment and dealt with accordingly. --] (]) 10:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

	==Vandalism==
	Vandalism means something very specific- edits that you don't agree with are not vandalism. Please, don't identify edits as vandalism that aren't vandalism, as you did , , , and . That isn't vandalism, it's just an edit conflict. Vandalism looks like . -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 12:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

	==I have asked for advice about your edits at ]==
	I have observed your edits with growing concern, and have opened a discussion at the Administrators' Incident Board in which I ask for input from other administrators about your way of editing. You are welcome to comment in that discussion at . -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 12:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

	== Notice of Arbitration Committee enforcement ==

	As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below.

	*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
	*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
	*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
	*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee.

	These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

	Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

	This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged ]. ]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>] 22:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:25, 7 March 2022

FYI

Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MUCHERS22 reported by User:Brewcrewer (Result: ) --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for constant and seemingly habitual edit warring. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Im sorry for the reverting, I tried to reach out to the person who kept deleting my adds without fair reason but I never got anything back from him. But like I said Im sorry for breaching the rules and it wont happen again, I will use the discussion page in such conflicts, if I get unblocked. I find the block unecessarry since I was just ignorant enough not to pay attention to the warning I got (from another editor) !. MUCHERS22 (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have six prior blocks for edit-warring. Because you did not stop edit-warring after these six blocks, I do not believe you that you will stop if this seventh block is lifted. Sandstein 11:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well like I said I am truly sorry for what I did and that I didnt pay enough attention, I tried to reach out to the editor too but he ignored my call, what should I have done i such a position? The people deleting my stuff did it just out of spite and no reason, just look for yourself which reason they used. Yes I have been blocked before but I have finally learned my lesson, it took 6 times, for some it may just take 1. If there isnt a single way for me to get back, please remove my user then. MUCHERS22 (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

6 blocks for the same reason shows me that you're not able to learn. That said, WP:OFFER exists - in order to make use of this, I recommend you go to a different Wikimedia project and start editing properly. When you return in June, show us that you now understand the policies. As you already should know, your userid can never be deleted. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again for the third time, let me know how I should have handle the conclict that ended up in six mounth ban? I reached out to the user who kept deleting my stuff (which was also without fair reason), but he ignored it. What should I have done? Please tell me because I am probably going to go in to that trap over and over, and you can see my earlier discussions on the Admin message board, I was never given a fair reason on the earlier blocks neither. No wonder I do the same misstakes. Giving me a ban for six mounths without telling me the reason is vulgar, I guess you rather find my political views contradicting with yours, just like the previous ban. Also like I said, some learn after 1 time someone learn after 10 times, thats relative. But hey, sure ban me 6 mounth or 6 years, why would I care? In such case I will only use another IP and I will be back with another username. Problem solved. MUCHERS22 (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Stop being disingenuous. You were repeatedly warned; anyone can look at the history of this page and see just how many times you received warnings and simply blanked them, neither responding to them nor modifying your behavior. If you come back under another username, and continue the same behavior, the exact same result will ensue; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of your edits - just your flawed approach to editing Misplaced Pages. --jpgordon 15:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been told i what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban)? You have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action? ] (]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}

There's no punishment being meted out - this is all about prevention. In every warning you ever received about edit-warring or 3 reverts, you were advised about the dispute resolution process. You were even made aware of the correct noticeboard when others violate 3RR. You were even made aware of how to request page protection. Because you continually failed to heed those very nice pieces of advice, then continued to blatantly break the bright line rule again and again, we have to protect this project. Beware: your continued disingenuous unblock requests will soon result in removal of your access to this page: as already noted, if you try to WP:EVADE this block, your alternate accounts may be blocked on sight. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again you fail to tell me which rules I have broken, I reached out to the people who deleted my stuff without plausible reason, when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that? Its just ridiculous. Keep coming with your threats of cutting me off forever, that just proves my point. Another nick will just be created ad finitum. MUCHERS22 (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that?" Because that is edit warring, about which you have been warned very many times. Your asking this question shows that you still do not understand why you are blocked. Because you also threaten to evade your block, your talk page access is hereby removed for continuing to make clearly invalid unblock requests. You can appeal this block to WP:BASC per e-mail. Sandstein 16:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)