Misplaced Pages

Talk:Motherfucker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:28, 28 May 2004 edit67.101.1.24 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:08, 30 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,380,766 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to Talk:Motherfucker/Archive 1. (BOT) 
(357 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
Rather than a "see also", probably should just be a ]. Also, isn't it usually a compound word (])? Hmm, that appears to be a redirect to ] which doesn't match the common use of the word at all. --] 21:43 Jan 10, 2003 (UTC)
{{Old AfD multi|date=29/11/2007|votepage=Motherfucker}}
{{censor}}
{{controversial}}
{{calm}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Linguistics|importance=low}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age=2160
| archiveprefix=Talk:Motherfucker/Archive
| numberstart=1
| maxarchsize=75000
| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minkeepthreads=1
| minarchthreads=2
| format= %%i
}}
{{section sizes}}
{{Annual readership}}


== Origin ==
Just redirect it to ] and mention that this is often used in the same context. -- ]


I thought it comes from the slave trade and refers to any male White Slavemaster who takes advantage of female slaves, often rape, sometimes resulting in half-caste bastard progeny. Is this a myth? ] (]) ] (]) 00:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
----

Merriam-Webster dates this term to 1952. This is significantly past the period of time implied by the article's notion that the term came about as a result of slave owners raping slave women. Is there any actual source for this information? --] 05:37 8 Jun 2003 (UTC)

: I don't know anything about the supposed origin of the term in slavery, but it certainly predates 1952 (although perhaps not in print). One anecdotal example was found by a friend who was researching old New Orleans police records concerning bars where music was played. Something along the line of in the late 1910s a man brought to court for stabbing someone told the judge that he had to stab the other guy, because of what the other guy had called him. The judge asked "what did he call you?" "He called me a motherf-----". --] 16:06 8 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
Moved:
:Although often thought to relate to the widely condemned biological and cultural ], its origins are to be found in North American ]. Here the sexual abuse of enslaved women often led to pregnancy. However the offspring were often enslaved like their mothers. Rather than refer to the man who impregnated their mother as ], the term '''motherfucker''' was often prefered. Similar grammatical forms are found in other african-english expressions such as ] and ].

I agree with Michael here. It's not the age of the term that's the problem, (as has been said, "] was the first motherfucker" <g>)it's this supposed derivation of it that's highly unlikely when you think about it. I'd like to see a source before it's put back. - ]

------
The song you quote from the Bloodhound Gang is actually a parody of a Prodigy song. wouldnt it be mroe apropriate to use the line from the original song? ] 23:41 16 Jun 2003 (UTC)

----

Great article, the grammer sings. --] 05:11, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
-----
The quote from the Bloodhound Gang seems a bit out of place. Scores of people have used the word to refer to just about anything under the sun, long before the members of that band were born. A more legitimate cultural reference would be better.
-----

Could someone edit in how the term "Mofo" came into being? I don't see how theres an 'O' after the 'F', when F!@#ers second letter is 'U'.

Latest revision as of 04:08, 30 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Motherfucker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 29/11/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
Censorship warningMisplaced Pages is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconLinguistics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Section sizes
Section size for Motherfucker (7 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 1,429 1,429
Variants 1,475 1,475
History and popular culture 7,589 7,589
Literature 515 515
See also 208 208
References 28 28
External links 285 285
Total 11,529 11,529


Origin

I thought it comes from the slave trade and refers to any male White Slavemaster who takes advantage of female slaves, often rape, sometimes resulting in half-caste bastard progeny. Is this a myth? Wokepedian (talk) Wokepedian (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: