Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dejvid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:36, 16 August 2010 editGeorge.millman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users715 edits →The Cut: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:24, 4 January 2025 edit undoDejvid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,729 edits →Works 
(51 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
]
==Welcome==
== Celtic Skirmishers ==
Be aware that anything involving the Celts can be a bit of a minefield. Unless you have some evidence, such as dispatches written by Brennus, Vercingetorix or Cassivellaunus expressing 'contempt' for skirmishers, this idea is only supposition, based perhaps on the "wild Celtic warrior" stereotype. Distinguish carefully between the Ancient '']'' and the modern '']'' ] (]) 10:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
:Okay, I've no problem with the new wording, except that you continue to confuse Britons with British. The Britons are the ancient people. The British are citizens of the United Kingdom. ] (]) 23:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Absolute PC Britspeak nonsense are ancient Germans or Irish not getting references as German or Irish <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hello and ''']''' to ]! Hope you like it here, and stick around.


== Talkback ==
Here are some tips to help you get started:


{{talkback|Monstrelet|2007 deletion}}
] (]) 13:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


==] nomination of ]==
* If you need ], post a question at the ]
]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag -->
* Eventually, you might want to read the ] and ].
{{Quote box
*Remember ]
| quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].
* Explore, ], and, most importantly, have fun!
| source = Thank you.
| width = 20%
| align = right
}}
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content.


Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that ] wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the article and state your intention on the article's ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> <span style="color: green;">]</span><span style="color: blue">]</span> ] 13:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Good luck!
]
] ]]] 15:11, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)


==Irak== == The Cut ==
Politically I agree with you, but the statement is speculative and not really encyclopaedic. ] 12:28, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Hi there
Wikpedia has an inherent left-wing bias. It's a function of the kind of people likely to be editing an online encyclopaedia - members of the petty inetelligentsia and underemployed graduate class (like me). There's not much you can do about it except have endless revert wars, some of which you can win if you know your facts well enough. Good luck. ] 12:55, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Please do not reinstate the sign indicating 'other characters'. I find this sign to be pretty pointless, since many of the characters in that section play a huge role in the show, particularly in the second series. They all appear on the official characters list on the site, so they should all be important enough to go in one section. For less important characters, there is a 'Recurring Characters' section. I would consider a recurring character to be anyone who has appeared in more than one full-length episode, but is not important enough to have a character profile on the site. ] (]) 09:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi - Please vote to support the move from ] &rarr; ] at ]. Thanks! ] 12:40, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


== The question is ... ==
==Just war==
I am no just war expert. I'm sorry I cannot be of more help. ] 22:32, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
==]==
It's nice to see somebody (a) making new articles and (b) filling in some very local information about a non-English-speaking country :-) It would be really good if you could provide a photograph, even if Sopot does sound a little dull!


Why are a tiny handful of obscure European articles using the wrong system in the first place '''when the major European articles do not'''?<br />
I jumped in mainly to correct a few spellings, but it looks like you picked up on them yourself so actually I had an edit clash. I classified this under "Towns in Croatia" but if you are going to be making more articles like this (Dugave, Travno perhaps?), do you think it would be better to set up ], ] (I don't know which would be a better translation of the Croatian) or just plain ] and put it in there instead?
and '''not''':<br />
Why should a truly glaring error be corrected?, a ridiculous question that for some reason apparently needs to be asked over and over and over again, ''ad infinitum ad nauseam''. In case there is any confusion on this point, the Latin language is not part of Chinese culture.<br />
] (]) 15:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


:Here's an idea. You go and correct the remainder of the bloody articles yourself, and then you can document the changes however the hell you like to do it.
Have fun with Misplaced Pages... I wonder if you'd like to consider making a few contributions to ] as well? You sound like you could provide quite a bit of useful information on places to visit in the region! --] 22:50, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
:My gift to you. Have fun with it.
:] (]) 15:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


:This kind of trash talk is not encouraged at Misplaced Pages. My apologies, Dejvid, on Varlaam's behalf.--] (]) 19:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
:I have the feeling that the best thing to do is follow the example of ] rather than make a category for neighbourhoods. Thanks for your reply! Hopefully Novi Zagreb will be getting an article soon --] 23:17, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)


::I can speak for myself. Thanks.
== Hi :) ==
::Since Dejvid loves playing Devil's advocate, let him do the actual work as opposed to obstructing others who are wasting their time doing it.


::What is your story, Wetman? Why are you intruding in other people's private conversations? Do you also open mail addressed to someone else? The sheer rudeness and arrogance around this place is unbelievable.
I recall you said hi to me on some talk page, but at the time I didn't have enough time to actually respond... so here it is :) --] 09:36, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::"Trash talk". I'm not American. Wrong guess.
::The word you were seeking was "disparagement".
::What I was actually using was ]. I have graciously provided the Wiktionary link. You failed to note the tone.
::] (]) 18:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
:::I didn't react because responding to rudeness rarely helps not because I thought what you said was okay. The "its only a joke" line is so calculated to wind someone up, I begin to wonder if that is not your intention. If it is not your intention then please think carefully about how you are expressing yourself.] (]) 21:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


== Links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda == == Timeline of Canadian history ==
The calendar was changed by a vandal in July.<br />
Why weren't you all over that guy instead of harassing me in some fit of pique?<br />


Don't bother to answer. I'm really not interested in whatever your motivation is.<br />
Could you please vote on the proposed move ] &rarr; ]? The vote is ]. Thanks. ] 17:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
] (]) 03:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
:If you had put in the edit summary "revert undiscussed era change" I would have realized that your edit was valid. Instead you left the edit summary blank. Surely you can see that if someone does not give a reason then other people will assume that you have no good reason. And why do you call that anon user a vandal when you did the same on the ] page? You seem unaware that the two styles have equal status and see a BCE for as a simple mistake.] (]) 12:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


In fact (Dejvid and also Wetman) have been involved in a number of edits in which they have either blatantly or slyly changed the era setting on articles - always to displace the BC/AD system with the BCE convention. THAT is what Dejvid's motivation is and also why the previous July vandalism of Timeline of Canadian history was of no interest! --] (]) 13:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
== Unexplained Reverts ==


==Notability?==
Looking through your , it seems you have made a very large number of unexplained reverts. Please see the Misplaced Pages policy at ] that states, "Always explain your reverts." Obviously anyone else who makes an edit has a good reason in mind for thinking that edit should be there, so if you revert with no explanation, you have simply increased conflict without bringing people any closer to agreeing on a solution. ] &mdash; ] | ] 15:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
CeCe Peniston may be notable but is this song notable?] (]) 12:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


: Hi, just noticed your message. You are right and I know what you mean, but my intention was to build the comprehensive discography of Peniston. Also, I am discussing the title with its producers and trying to get more details as for the release including possible chart positions. ] (])
==]==
Dejvid, regarding your complaint of a 3RR violation, a glance at the history suggests you may also have violated it. If you continue to revert, you may be blocked from editing for 24 hours. In the meantime, I've protected the page so you can discuss the issues on talk. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 01:14, May 9, 2005 (UTC)


== Kosovo ==
:Hi Dejvid, regarding your query about the ground rules, the rule regarding reverts is that we're not allowed to revert the same article more than three times in any given 24 hours. See ]. However, the three-revert rule (called 3RR) is an upper limit; ideally, we shouldn't get to that stage. I'm going to look around for someone knowledgeable in this area; there must be someone out there who can offer an educated opinion to help resolve the dispute. In the meantime, try to cite authoritative sources for any edits you make to the article, and ask Mir Harven to do the same. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 16:26, May 12, 2005 (UTC)


Hello,
== Thru a misspelling ==


I'm curious why you're disputing the fact that Kosovo became the crux or cradle of Serbian culture, religion and national identity, while not at all disputing the sentence about the Albanian national awakening. It is a wide known fact that Kosovo means a lot to the Serbian national spirit, anyone who does the tiniest bit of research will see that outright. Providing a reference for that, which is what I did, was the most absurd thing I have ever did on Misplaced Pages, because it's like asking a reference for the ocean being salty. I sincerely hope you didn't have a hidden agenda in your revert, as many on the Kosovo article do, because it just seems strange to me that someone would target a reference to what Kosovo means to the Serbs while being content with the introduction only discussing what Kosovo means to Albanians. The article, as I'm sure you'd agree, should be written in a fair manner, and the introduction carefully brushes any hint of the significance of Kosovo to the Serbs, perhaps due to the current political situation in the region. However, this is an encyclopaedia and we have an obligation to provide fair and unbalanced information not only for ourselves, but for future generations as well.
Hi Dejvid,


--] 20:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
In my dictionary, 'thru' is defined as an informal spelling of 'through'.
::Thanks for the feedback. My reply is on ].] (]) 11:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


== Please participate in this discussion ==
You might see 'thru' in things like song titles, and even company names (for example http://www.walkthru.org/ ), but it's not really appropriate in an encyclopedia or any formal writing.


You were involved in the ] for ] article and I request that you leave a comment and your opinion on the question I have raised on the ]. Thank you for your time. ]]<sup>]</sup> 22:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
It's similar to the use of the words 'lite' and 'light'.


== The frogs seek a king ==
----


I'm at a loss to see what it is you're objecting to in the interpretation of the fable by Phaedrus, unless it is my generalising that it is his intention to demonstrate that the restraint of law is a good thing and that tyranny is not. The opening lines translate as follows:
The official OED website (which I have access to through my university), says
::''Athenae cum florerent aequis legibus'',
''thru: now used informally as a reformed spelling and abbreviation (chiefly) in N. Amer.''
::When the Athenians flourished with equal laws,
::''procax libertas civitatem miscuit'',
::Impudent liberty confounded (or stirred up) the state
::''frenumque solvit pristinum licentia''.
::And license loosened the former restraint (lit. rein).
It goes on to outline the historical context of a take-over of the state by a tyrant and how Aesop rationalised the situation. I must therefore ask you justify from the Latin that Aesop's moral is that a boring king is better than a 'glory seeker'. I think you're reading later interpretations of the story into a discussion in the article of what Phaedrus/Aesop is saying in the poem. I don't want to start an edit war, so I have left the tag in place until I have a clearer idea what point you're trying to make. ] (]) 13:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
::::Okay, your translation seems much closer to your interpretation and you are right in suspecting that I was unable to read the Latin. Putting the translation into verse does seem to have done serious violence to the meaning. Putting my own interpretation (which was based on another version) in the edit description was probably a mistake when the actual query was closeness of your interpretation to the source.] (]) 21:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


Thanks, Dejvid. I've removed the tag now we've sorted that out. Actually, I thought ]'s version was pretty close to the original, considering the restrictions of style. I'm not really a Latinist, so just to check I ran those lines through the function that gives word for word alternatives. ] (]) 23:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


== ] ==
The New Oxford American English Dictionary 2nd edition (which ships with MacOS X 10.4) also says ''thru: informal spelling of through.''


Hi, I'm from Wp:Italy. I now you did in the page Battle of Cannae, so I ask you if you could kindly answer the question at the and of the talk of the page. I would be very grateful to you, because in italian version near the sentence «He suggests that at the Battle of Zama Hannibal was quoted saying that he had fought Paullus at Cannae» there is the template:Please clarify. Thank you. --] (]) 22:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
] 00:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


== Undue template ==


Dejvid, you have added the Undue template to the ] article, stating "over representation of views hostile to Kosovo". If you want this issue to be properly discussed, then you will need to create a new section on the talk page in which you put forward your arguments. I know you have already raised this issue in the "Libya and outdated info" section but this is getting lost amongst the wider discussion about Libya. I suggest you start a completely new section to make sure the discussion goes well. Regards, ] (]) 07:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
:Fair point - I'll need to take a little time to make a fair summary which doesn't just repeat myself.] (]) 15:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


== ] ==


{{U|Kolega2357}} has asked me to notify you of ] on shwiki. The reason they want to remove your adminship is inactivity. Regards, ] (] • ]) 17:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


Imaš odgovor tu u komentarima. --'''] (])''' 14:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


== ] ==


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
==Sociological considerations about greenhouse gases==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 -->
Thank you very much for your feed back, I rewrote the article entirely! I must admit it was also not neutral enough, don't hesitate to formulate some other crtics.


== ]: Voting now open! ==
A little question :
do you think the following sentence would be NPOV enough ?


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
"Misplaced Pages is an excellent answer angainst global warming, because of its information content and because nobody can edit Misplaced Pages and drive at the same time!"


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The last part sounds a bit like a joke, but it reallity it's perfectly correct, suppose a car lover get some sort of addiction to Misplaced Pages, he is very much likely to drive less!


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
]
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Laserresal
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/6&oldid=750545473 -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
==Sortan==
Many of the cases Sortan has edited have been overwhelmingly CE/BCE before his changes. Some have not eg ]. I have to say that it is probably best to leave the decision BC v BCE to people who actually edit the individual pages but in some cases the result of this edit war has changed an overwhelmingly BCE page to BC. If we can't agree on criteria as to how to make pages consistent can we agree to a revert to the situation "ante bellum" so to speak. ] 17:58, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
:Then, it appears that Soltan's single topic crusade on Misplaced Pages has been counterproductive. By "ante bellum" do you want me to revert my own edits?--] 18:08, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:Nah, if you look at the history it was ] who had previously changed BCE/CE to BC/AD. While it might be best to leave the decision to the people who regularly edit the pages, you're just inviting a visit from ] to force an article to use BC/AD that way. ] 18:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Most likely Soltan is a troll in which case he may even intend to be "counterproductive". Jguk has reacted to Soltan by going a beyond a revert to make pages consistetly AD-BC where they were overwhelming (if not consistently so) CE-BCE. So maybe when you revert then revert back to a pre Soltan state rather than to Jguk. On some pages active editors have taken action and there I think outsiders should leave things be. I might add that while I count myself as an outsider on most pages I am the most active editor for ]. BTW I fully understand Jguk's reaction but it isn't the best way to end an edit war.] 18:29, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 -->


==Disambiguation link notification for June 7==
:First, I resent repeatedly being called a troll... second if you're going to revert my edits, then please also go through this list to revert all of Jguk's edits. ] 18:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>
==Way forward==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Dejvid, thanks for your comments on my talk page. The strange thing is, we already have an effective compromise - don't change articles that are consistent in their style. It's just a shame not everyone can respect it. As for Sortan, as a troll, his edits should be reverted on sight - unfortunately it creates a lot of hassle when we do have a troll (as poor RickK found on many an occasion). It creates a lot of work for good editors, but if we don't stand up to them, WP would be overrun by them. I'd welcome your support in getting rid of Sortan asap, ] 18:52, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
:It does, and thanks to the efforts of a number of editors, Sortan has been reverted in almost all instances - so I think this task is already done. If we see him edit again, we should just revert whatever he's done, ] 19:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
== suzerainty ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The change "it was often suzerain to neighboring powers" -> "it was often under the suzerainity of neighboring powers" is exactly right, thanks :) --] 17:27, 14 August 2005 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
==Hadrian==
Hi Dejvid - thanks for the note; on 'thru', yes it is a (primarily US) variant spelling, but not a common one - even in the US, it is used mainly colloquially, not in formal text. Elsewhere in Misplaced Pages, I've seen 'thru' used on talk pages, but I can't recollect seeing it in any other article. I would regard it in the same way as the wiki style guide recommends against other colloquialisms like "it's" for "it is". Of references, they generally follow what they refer to, not precede it - starting a sentence with a reference looks very odd, which is why I moved the fullstops the other side - ] 11:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
== Ancient Egyptians naming conventions ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=866998024 -->


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
Hi Dejvid,


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Misplaced Pages has already<blockquote>]</blockquote>which I rather like, what would you think of something similar like<blockquote>''']'''</blockquote>


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Anyhow, I suppose the thing would need some consideration, if you see<blockquote>]</blockquote>and<blockquote>] (which contains a "cleanup" message)</blockquote>and<blockquote>]</blockquote>...each of these using more or less its own naming system (and these lists don't even contain non-regnal Egyptians, neither non-pharaoh deities, neither Egyptians in the Roman age...).


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
So probably not the easiest topic you chose with many opinions going around... But don't let that stop you! There are surely wikipedians wanting to assist, see for instance ]...
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=866998024 -->


== Uriah Rose ==
Don't know whether this helps, maybe just taking your courage together and start the Ancient Egyptians NC would be a step that hurts nobody. --] 07:31, 1 September 2005 (UTC)


I'm working on him and am not near finished. ] (]) 10:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
==Amphictyonic Council==
In ], you put the title of the page itself into the merge message. With what page should it have been mergend?--] 14:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
==Wiki process==
Thank you; I may yet ask to support such a PoV. ]? ] 23:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
==Ultramarine==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Ultramarine, in his arbitration proceedings, is claiming that you consider me to be a rigid Marxist. See ]. (Two of the footnotes link to your last edits in ].)The relevance of all this to the questions actually at issue is somewhat distant; but would you mind commenting on the evidence page?


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Giving evidence will not involve you in the arbitration. If I read the instructions correctly, you should not comment directly on Ultramarine's remarks, but make a separate main section for your own testimony.


If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. ] 04:48, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 -->


== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
==Poliorcetes==
You're right, but I put "seiger of cities" for the alliteration, and because I think Rhodes was his major failure - and therefore notable. ] 23:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
== Dominion of Melchizedek ==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Greetings Mr. Barnsdale: Noticed that you have reverted this article before. Have a look at "just the facts" heading on Dominion of Melchizedek talk page and please let me know if this is the right approach and your thoughts, if you want to help to find a consensus for this subject. KAJ 19:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
::Note this is a Johnski sockpuppet. ] 07:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->


== July 2021 ==
:::Yes I have noticed the signs of sock pupetry. And while I was briefly taken in my his concern for consensus I have seen thru that too. Calling him a vandel, however, does seem to me incorrect and worse it may lead to the casual observer thinking it is he that is the reasonable one. Which is not to say that, if I had for a longer period been debating with someone who thinks an obvious hoax should be given serious consideration, I might not now be using the v-word.] 09:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been or will be ].
::::I see your point, however there is no other means in which to describe his behavior. Most importantly, I am glad your aware of the situation. Thanks for your continued help. ] 09:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the ], and seek ] with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ] (]) 00:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
Dejvid, thanks for adding your name to the arbitration list. I think you also might have added some evidence, which is also appreciated. I'll let everyone know when we start the arbitration process. ] 06:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
== Srpskohrvatski jezik ==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi David,


If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
I'm node_ue from the Serbocroatian Misplaced Pages.
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 -->


== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
I changed the "glavnadobrodosli" template to say "stokavski" instead of "srpskohrvatski". The reason for this was that on Misplaced Pages-l, people have discussed the problem that most Bosnians and Croatians find the name "srpskohrvatski" offensive, so I thought it would be better to use a less objectionable term.


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
I thought it would be best to use "jugopazdnoslovenski" or "stokavski", as both seem accurate descriptors of the language. So, I changed it to "stokavski", but I was reverted a few hours later.
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I'm eager to hear your thoughts on the matter -- should we keep "srpskohrvatski" despite the fact that it may offend some, or should we change it to something else despite the fact that it may be less accurate, more confusing, and/or still offensive to some? --] 22:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
== Request for Arbitration ==


</div>
You have been requested to appear as a plantiff an arbitration case. Comments have been added on your behalf. If you wish to add comments please contact me. Here is a link to the case ]
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
:David, your statement on terms of the arbitration was placed in the wrong area. It should be above Johnski's statement. Can you please fix it? Thanks.. ] 03:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
==Arbitration accepted==
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
] has been accepted. Please place evidence at ]. Proposals and comments may be made at ]. ] 04:11, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== WP quote in DOM article ==


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
David, I was looking at the Washington Post quote in the DOM article. It does seem like the quote is a little sloppy. I'm not sure who put it in there, but I wanted to get your take on what we could do. What do you think about just putting the words, "you get the feeling" back into the quote, or even just removing the quote completely. Please let me know what you think ASAP. ] 00:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


</div>
:It seems okay to me. The version I've read was from the DOM site but it did look as they did no more that adding inline comments. That they considered it a ruse is pretty explicit. What do you see as the problem.] 06:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
::I don't know, that's just one of the things he's complaining about quite a bit. It seems small and I thought perhaps we could try to compromise on that one thing to prevent any more reverts for the time being. I'm trying to get everyone to leave the article alone while arbitration is decided. Maybe it's a stupid idea. I know that one person has already expressed displeasure at the idea, which makes me wonder if the group consensus will be the same reaction.


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
::I'll wait to hear back from some others, but by your statement I'm taking it your ok with that. Which would you prefer, leaving it out or just putting in the rest of the statement. Please let me know. ] 08:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Arbitration Talk Page ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
I have created a special arbitration talk page. This is to discuss what evidence we want as a group and to present and make recommendations before putting them on the arbitration page. Please feel free to make suggestions here: ] 07:36, 21 November 2005 (UTC)


</div>
I have begun to post evidence. Hopefully some of you can help me a bit with this. It's turning out to be a lot of work. ] 10:39, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
==l==
== Works ==
Trasnslator of] : Common Sense, Theory and Practice of the Rights of Man, The Age of Reason, etc.,
he published many books, some of which were printed by order of the Convention: ..., Paris, 1793,
*''Fundamental bases of public education and of any free constitution'' (Bases fondamentales de l'instruction publique et de toute constitution libre), Paris, 1793, in-8deg., 190 p., Bibl. Nat. microfiche m. 5769.-


*''Organic division of citizens into tens, hundreds and thousands, with the means to make the best possible elections'' (Division organique des citoyens en dizaines, centaines et mille, avec les moyens de faire les meilleures élections possibles), Paris, year III
== Last Call ==
*''Right of citizenship, exercise of the sovereignty of the French people and guarantee of public freedom against the abuses of equality in law'' (Droit de cité, exercice de la souveraineté du peuple français et garantie de la liberté publique contre les abus de l'égalité en droit), Paris, year III
*''Inconveniences of the right of primogeniture, work in which it is demonstrated that any distinction between the children of the same family leads to a host of evils... and decision of MM. the doctors of the house and royal society of Navarre on primogeniture, Paris, n.d., in-8deg., XIV-224 p., Bibl. Nat. R.40734.-


Ok guys, this is a last call for evidence. No one has posted evidence besides myself. At the end of this week, I'm going to let the Arbitration Committee know that we are done.


*''Organic division of citizens into tens, hundreds and thousands, with the means to make the best possible elections'', Paris, year III, in-8deg., 56 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le381620 bis.-
When recommendations are made, I will need you guys to check in and sign on that you agree with them. Otherwise this will be all for not. I intend on asking for a six month ban for Johnski from Misplaced Pages as well as 1 year probation from editing DOM related articles. ] 01:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
*''Right of citizenship, exercise of the sovereignty of the French people and guarantee of public freedom against the abuses of equality in law'', Paris, year IIIn in-8deg., 20 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le381620.-

*''Inconveniences of the right of primogeniture, work in which it is demonstrated that any distinction between the children of the same family leads to a host of evils... and decision of MM. the doctors of the house and royal society of Navarre on primogeniture (), Paris, n.d., in-8deg., XIV-224 p., Bibl. Nat. R.40734.-
==Arbitration Proposed Decision ==
*''De la liberté indéfinie de la presse, et de l'importance de ne soumettre la communication de ses pensées qu'à l'opinion publique...,'' Paris, 1791, in-8deg., 37 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lb39 9992.-

*''Mesures de salut public, contre les obstacles intérieurs à l'établissement de la Répub''lique, Paris, an III, in-8deg., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lb41 4081 (ndeg.s 1 et 4).-
Just to make everyone aware, arbitrators have begun to write the proposed decision in the arbitration case. You can view the decision here:.
*''M. Lamiral réfuté par lui-même, ou Réponse aux opinions de cet auteur sur l'abolition de la traite des Noirs, par un ami des blancs et des noirs'', Paris, 1790, in-8deg., 80 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lk9 102.-

*''Des sociétés populaires considérées comme une branche essentielle de l'instruction publique'', Paris, 1792, in-8deg., 18 p., Bibl. Nat., microfiche m.5779.-
So far no punative measures have been offered to solve the problems regarding the behavior of those involved. I strongly urge people to post comments asking for a stronger proposed decision from the Arbitration Committee. Otherwise, this will be all for nothing. We need to lobby them to get a ban on users as well as having them banned from editing certain articles for a period of time. There needs to be a clear message to those involved to stop reverting the article. Your comments can be left here: .
*''Convention nationale. Motif des opinions de F. Lanthenas sur le jugement de Louis XV''I, (16 janvier 1793), Paris, s.d., in-8deg., 7 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 150.-

*''Convention nationale. Motifs de faire du 10 août un jubilé fraternel, en consacrant une déclaration des devoirs de l'homme'' (août 1793), Paris, 1793, in-8deg.,77 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38404.-
I know this is a busy season for everyone, but this will only take a few minutes. We need to deal with this now. If not, this problem will continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages. ] 00:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*''Convention nationale. Gouvernement révolutionnaire.'' Projet présenté (le 16 thermidor an II), Paris, s.d., in-8deg., 12 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 879.-

*''Convention nationale. Projet pour retirer une grande masse d'assignats'', Paris, 14 pluviose an III, in-8deg., 43 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 1197.-
== Johnski Arbitration Case ==
*''Convention nationale. Moyens de consolider la révolution du 9 thermido''r... proposés dans la séance du 12 germinal an III, in-8deg., 7 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 1324.-

*Nombreux autres ouvrages : voir le détail dans le Catalogue général des Livres imprimés de la Bibliothèque nationale.
Just a quick update on the arbitration case, two new arbitrators voted and there now might be enough votes to close the case finally. We need to keep an eye on this and make sure whatever solution that passes is fully implemented.

I'm pushing for a little bit tougher outcome, but realistically it's probably not going to happen. If you have time, please make some comments at ]. Hopefully, semi-protection will be enough. ] 12:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

== RFAR closed ==

== ] ==
This request for arbitration is closed. ] and associated articles, shall be semi-protected. If necessary, <span class="plainlinks">] (] &bull; ] &bull; &bull; ] &bull; )</span>, or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so.

For the Arbitration Committee, --] ] 04:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


:templates substituted by a bot as per ] ] 08:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

== Contraction and Convergence ==

Hello Dejvid,

I write concerning the above page. On March 7, ] tagged the page as a copyright infringement of the text (pdf). You removed the copyright tag on March 20 with the edit summary ''(revert - if there is problem fix it)''. <p>Please note that the {{tl|copyvio}} tag may not be removed in this fashion, nor may a tagged page be edited once the template has been placed. As the tag itself states:
:<code>Note that simply modifying copyrighted text is not sufficient to avoid copyright violation — it is best to write the article from scratch.</code>

Editors who would like to write a new article on the topic should do so on a subpage, a link to which is generated by the template. <p>To come to the matter at hand, the article in its present form is a clear copyright infringement. Comparing the current version to the tagged original I find that the text is essentially a direct copy of material found on pages 2 and 3 of the pdf document linked above; I count only 2 or 3 new sentences/rephrasings, one word substitution (''formula'' for ''calculus'') and some spelling changes (the British to the American). Even the supercripted reference numbers are those of the original, as are the entire list of external links—unsurprisingly, as the thing was initially lifted in its entirety from that document. ], and I have little choice but to delete it. <p>From the energy with which you contributed to the page, I surmise that you must feel it quite important for Misplaced Pages to have an article on "Contraction and Convergence". If there is anything that I can do to assist you in writing an original contribution, please let me know. I will of course be unable to restore the page, or the page history, these actions being forbidden by our copyright conventions. But as the text was essentially identical to the GCI pdf which is easily viewable, I hope that this will pose no problems. Very kind regards —''] 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)''

==Why POV?==
Hi there, I'm wondering about your recent edit to ]. What makes you think that the word "reclaimed" is POV? And whose POV? I mean, I guess I'm wondering because I wrote that sentence originally, and I have no patience for noble savagery. Cheers, ]] ] 23:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

:''"Because to use reclaimed assumes that it was faithfully reacreating something that had before existed."'' Ah, I see, here's the misunderstanding. I was using the word 'reclaim' in the way that gay people have reclaimed words like 'queer', or feminists have reclaimed 'girl' or 'cunt'. It's not a question of recreating anything, just revalorizing it (and taking possesssion of it). But I agree, it's not worth getting into a revert war over! Best, ]] ] 16:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

== ]: Phonemic or phonetic? ==
I believe your recent edit to ] is incorrect. The assertion is that the ] pronunciation of "Eithne Ní Bhraonáin" and the ] pronunciation of "Enya Brennan" sound similar to the ear, which smacks of ] to me. For it to be ], the claim would have to be that either the ] or ] pronunciation of "Eithne Ní Bhraonáin" and "Enya Brennan" are the same in that specific language. As I understand it, ] is basically about context, while ] is basically about sound. ] 16:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
: I see your point as well, but just for the record the Irish spelling isn't in the English alphabet. There are no diacritical marks in English. The fact that English and Irish can both be rendered in the glyphs of the ISO-8859-1 "Latin 1" character set is deliberate, but it's a computer artifact, not a linguistic intention. But to be honest, I think we're both splitting hairs, so I'll leave the result at whatever it turns out to be. ] 17:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

== Re: Thru is not a typo ==

Hi there,

I disagree with that. In the majority of cases I see it (eg 'sections 32 thru 35', 'Monday thru Friday', 'Data flows thru the pipeline'), it is not correction. The only cases I can find that are valid are in song titles, and American phrases such as drive-thru, cut-thru and thru-hike.

That said, I'll remove it from my spell list for the moment, as I've plenty of other corrections to make. Cheers, ] 19:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
==oo==
Zvdravo, are you from maribor, im from maribor

== Just war ==

I've added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ] and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at ]. If you remove the {{tl|dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Since you worked on this article, just letting you know... ] 00:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

:no problem -hope your shoulder gets better soon. ] 12:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

::I replaced the merge tags on ] and ]. I don't know if you plan to do more work on these and anticpated deprecation of these tags, or perhaps had another reason, but I think it's important that those who run across these articles individually in the meantime be aware of the mutual existence. ] 17:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

==Sparta==
Please take a look at the Sparta page. User Miskin insists on calling it a World Power or a Superpower, neither of which I believe is appropriate. ] 13:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello again Dejvid, Would you please take a look at ]. The current introduction says Sparta was a ] that "overpowered" both Athens and Persia. I think this is wrong because the link says that a superpower is able to "project power on a worldwide scale;", which I think does not apply to Sparta. I have tried moving the text to farther down the article by users Miskin and Domitius insist on keeping it in the introduction. Regards, ] 20:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

== BC/BCE pages ==

Hello!

You seem to be missing my point here. The BCE year articles are redirects to the BC year articles and you shouldn't link to redirect pages if you can avaoid it. Rather, you should link directly to the page on which the article is. Secondly, if it were the other way around, that the BCE year articles were the ones where the articles are and the BC pages were redirects to them, I would change the links from BC to BCE. Would the form <nowiki>]</nowiki> be agreeable? /] <sup>] ]</sup> 13:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

==FreeLords==
A "{{]}}" template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] 12:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

== Strange request ==

Hello. I see that you are an administrator on sh Misplaced Pages. I stumbled across .sh today, and noticed the Site Notice is fairly out of date, still showing the fundraising drive bar at the top. .sh appears to be the only wiki still having this. See <s> http://sh.wikipedia.org/MediaWiki:Sitenotice </s> http://sh.wikipedia.org/MediaWiki:Anonnotice. It takes an admin to edit the MediaWiki interface, so rather than asking for special permission, I figured I'd ask you (as you speak English and are one of the only active admins on that wiki). I hope you don't mind. Thanks. --] - '']'' - ] 08:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

:Actually, right after I left you this message, I stumbled across OC Ripper's page. http://sh.wikipedia.org/User_talk:OC_Ripper#The_Site_Notice. Thanks. --] - '']'' - ] 09:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

==mysql==
You misspelled "program", since the sentence didn't really seem to add anything to the introduction it was easier to just undo it. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==AfD nomination of ]==
]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw -->

== BC or BCE ==

Hi! In ] you insist on BCE in the dates. Why, since all the date-articles are written with "BC"? - ] 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
:The compromize has been to favor the status quo. This is because every time there has been a discussion opinion and for that mater arguments have been equal for both forms.] 09:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

The fact is that the links in the articles should be refreshed according to the changes, however you do the opposite, you block this procedure for no reason by keeping links in the article to redirect pages. All the articles use the "BC" instead of "BCE" and everyone is free to replace it even in the articles that you are interested in. PS: The articles, that we have included in our watchlist and we are contributors to, don't belong to us so we don't have the right to practice our favorite style in them especially when it doesn't keep step with the general rules. - ] 11:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

:The best solution is to update the article according to wikipedia's policy and other updates. - ] 05:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

The redirect links were implemented because each time the title of an article changed, all the links to it throughout wikipedia would be dead. - ] 09:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages Policy states that the dating nomenclature used originally in the article should not be changed unless for substantive reason. Your personal preference is not a substantive reason. You changed all the dates to BCE/CE in September, what is your issue?? ] (]) 05:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
:the policy does not mention the original form - it is merely conservative for all cases.] (]) 11:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

==]==
]
Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also ] and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at ]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> ] (]) 20:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
==AfD nomination of ]==
]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:History of western Eurasia | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 21:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

== Indira Varma ==

] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added {{#if:Indira Varma|to the page ]}} do not comply with our ] and have been removed. ]; nor should it be used for ] or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses ] tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the {{#if:Indira Varma|]|article's talk page}} before reinserting it. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --> --] (]) 21:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

== MoS length and complexity ==

Dejvid—Thank you for your interest in this matter. I believe that our styleguides are so substantial and involved at least partly because of the nature of English, which is—as Clive James put it—"big and baggy". The fact that so many anglophones all over the world can agree on so much about how their language should be optimised is extraordinary. All English-language style guides worth their salt are large.

I'm a professional editor, but found my knowledge of some of the technical features of the language improved after reading the MoS (and its important side-kicks, especially MOSNUM). More germaine than taking aim at the size and elaboration of these two style guides is the unwieldy structure and duplication in the 52 subpages of the MoS. Are you interested in joining the drive to rationalise them at ]? ] ] 14:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for asking me. The fact you asked and the way you have asked is appreciated. However, I disagree that the problem is that it is badly structured. Duplication has some value in cases where a user wants to check usage because they fear they might otherwise write something which is incorrect English.

Essentially the need is to reduce not to rationalize.

But thanks for asking.
] (]) 23:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== Merge proposal ==

Please see ] for the current discussion. I'm letting everyone know who has a comment on the relevant talk pages. Obviously, we're not going to push anything through without a full discussion of every issue, including whether to merge at all. My sense is that there's wide agreement on all the big points, but the devil is in the details.

P.S. I also support "E.U. enlargement in a westerly direction" :) - Dan ] (]) 18:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


== Population control ==
Hi there. You have worked on the ] article about a year ago, however you had trouble finding sources... if you are still interested in working on the article you can find sources at . Best --] (]) 19:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hey - so I've left your edit (for now) that Hasdrubal was the King of ] instead of being King of the ].

Correct me if I'm wrong, but (as the Carthaginian Empire article states) the Empire lasted from 575 BCE until 146 BCE. Since Hasdrubal ruled during this time period, how was he not the monarch of the Empire? ] (]) <sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
:Sounds like a plan to me. ] (]) <sup><small>]</small></sup> 16:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

== Re:History of Sparta ==

Hi, Dejvid, I'll beign by saying what a great job you've done so far with the article. It is looking great. The main issue that needs to be addressed is that several paragraphs don't have any citations. If the number of citations is improved then I have no problems what so ever reassessing the article. Keep up the good work! ] (]) 22:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

I may be missing something but ...
Appius Claudius Caecus is already in "Category:Roman Republican consuls" so isn't adding 4th-century BC rulers both redundant and risking swamping that cat with consuls?] (]) 10:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:I (and whoever miscategorized Appius Claudius Caecus in "Ancient Roman dictators") misread his article that ''he'' (and not his father) was ] in ]. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>(])</sup></span> 05:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

== Re:History_of_Sparta ==
I'll take a look at it and get back to you ASAP. ] (]) 21:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:Great job with the article so far. To become B-Class, it just needs the last and frist section to be cited. I'll try help you with that. On top of that, you will need a seperate list of sources that you have used and a bigger lead will be needed. All this will be needed if you plan to nominate the article for GAC in the future, which I hope you do. ] (]) 22:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

==3RR and ENGVAR/ ISE==

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- {{uw-3rr}} -->

Also let me please explain to you ]. No specific style of English is correct on wikipedia, all styles are allowed to be used. However whatever style is used, the page must be consistent (must be used throughout the article and not mix two styles). ISE spelling is preferred in standard ], whereas IZE is ] (a type of British English) and ]. There is currently an archived consensus on the article ''"]"'' to use British English with ISE spellings, therefore we must use the ISE spelling throughout the article. We are not meant to mix two styles IZE and ISE, so due to the article consensus we are to use ISE spellings as this is what was agreed. Also currently throughout the article, ISE spellings are used. When you edited the article you used IZE spelling, I changed it to ISE because of the consensus but also because it looks messy with two different types of spellings used. Once a consensus is established, were are not to change the style used unless there are strong national ties to the topic, which there isn't in our case. So on this particular article ISE spellings are used, on different articles different spellings are used for different reasons. I hope this makes sense. Regards ] (]) 22:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

:4 reverts in 24 hours on one article violates the 3RR, I was just warning you not to violate the rule. The ISE:IZE has a ratio of 3:2 in the UK, to many people IZE is seen as an Americanism. Also ISE is popular in commonwealth countries such as Australia, New Zealand and India, but not in Canada as the US has more influence on them and consequently IZE is more popular there. Almost all mainstream British media uses ISE, so does the Govt, NHS, EU ect. IZE is more common in Oxbridge, Journals and the MOD/ NATO. But both ISE and IZE are acceptable in British English. Please see ] for more. If you search the archives you will be able to locate past discussions on language usage. Also remember to stick to the existing style which is used. There are some exemptions, such as quotes, book/ film names, the name of Organisations such as NATO uses IZE, so when writing its full name we have to spell it as "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", not ISE as that is not how NATO is officially spelled. ] (]) 01:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

::Also if I recall, one of the reasons why it was decided to use British English ISE version was because the Kosovo-Serbia dispute is seen as a European affair, so the European style of English was decided to be the variant for the article and so the Style of English used by the European Union and Council of Europe was to be used and that is the ISE version. Also Malta and Ireland do not use IZE at all and since the British Govt uses ISE, and this is a political/ Governmental dispute, ISE seemed more appropriate. ] (]) 02:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

== Celtic Skirmishers ==

Be aware that anything involving the Celts can be a bit of a minefield. Unless you have some evidence, such as dispatches written by Brennus, Vercingetorix or Cassivellaunus expressing 'contempt' for skirmishers, this idea is only supposition, based perhaps on the "wild Celtic warrior" stereotype. Distinguish carefully between the Ancient '']'' and the modern '']'' ] (]) 10:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
:Okay, I've no problem with the new wording, except that you continue to confuse Britons with British. The Britons are the ancient people. The British are citizens of the United Kingdom. ] (]) 23:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

== Talkback ==

{{talkback|Monstrelet|2007 deletion}}
] (]) 13:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

==] nomination of ]==
]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag -->
{{Quote box
| quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].'''''
| source = Thank you.
| width = 20%
| align = right
}}
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that ] wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the article and state your intention on the article's ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> <span style="color: green;">]</span><span style="color: blue">]</span> ] 13:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

== The Cut ==

Hi there

Please do not reinstate the sign indicating 'other characters'. I find this sign to be pretty pointless, since many of the characters in that section play a huge role in the show, particularly in the second series. They all appear on the official characters list on the site, so they should all be important enough to go in one section. For less important characters, there is a 'Recurring Characters' section. I would consider a recurring character to be anyone who has appeared in more than one full-length episode, but is not important enough to have a character profile on the site. ] (]) 09:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:24, 4 January 2025

User talk:Dejvid/archive2010

Celtic Skirmishers

Be aware that anything involving the Celts can be a bit of a minefield. Unless you have some evidence, such as dispatches written by Brennus, Vercingetorix or Cassivellaunus expressing 'contempt' for skirmishers, this idea is only supposition, based perhaps on the "wild Celtic warrior" stereotype. Distinguish carefully between the Ancient Britons and the modern British Paul S (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I've no problem with the new wording, except that you continue to confuse Britons with British. The Britons are the ancient people. The British are citizens of the United Kingdom. Paul S (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Absolute PC Britspeak nonsense are ancient Germans or Irish not getting references as German or Irish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.174.224 (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dejvid. You have new messages at Monstrelet's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Monstrelet (talk) 13:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilcar's victory with Navaras

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Hamilcar's victory with Navaras, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cyberthrone :) 13:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

The Cut

Hi there

Please do not reinstate the sign indicating 'other characters'. I find this sign to be pretty pointless, since many of the characters in that section play a huge role in the show, particularly in the second series. They all appear on the official characters list on the site, so they should all be important enough to go in one section. For less important characters, there is a 'Recurring Characters' section. I would consider a recurring character to be anyone who has appeared in more than one full-length episode, but is not important enough to have a character profile on the site. George.millman (talk) 09:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

The question is ...

Why are a tiny handful of obscure European articles using the wrong system in the first place when the major European articles do not?
and not:
Why should a truly glaring error be corrected?, a ridiculous question that for some reason apparently needs to be asked over and over and over again, ad infinitum ad nauseam. In case there is any confusion on this point, the Latin language is not part of Chinese culture.
Varlaam (talk) 15:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Here's an idea. You go and correct the remainder of the bloody articles yourself, and then you can document the changes however the hell you like to do it.
My gift to you. Have fun with it.
Varlaam (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
This kind of trash talk is not encouraged at Misplaced Pages. My apologies, Dejvid, on Varlaam's behalf.--Wetman (talk) 19:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
I can speak for myself. Thanks.
Since Dejvid loves playing Devil's advocate, let him do the actual work as opposed to obstructing others who are wasting their time doing it.
What is your story, Wetman? Why are you intruding in other people's private conversations? Do you also open mail addressed to someone else? The sheer rudeness and arrogance around this place is unbelievable.
"Trash talk". I'm not American. Wrong guess.
The word you were seeking was "disparagement".
What I was actually using was irony. I have graciously provided the Wiktionary link. You failed to note the tone.
Varlaam (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I didn't react because responding to rudeness rarely helps not because I thought what you said was okay. The "its only a joke" line is so calculated to wind someone up, I begin to wonder if that is not your intention. If it is not your intention then please think carefully about how you are expressing yourself.Dejvid (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Timeline of Canadian history

The calendar was changed by a vandal in July.
Why weren't you all over that guy instead of harassing me in some fit of pique?

Don't bother to answer. I'm really not interested in whatever your motivation is.
Varlaam (talk) 03:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

If you had put in the edit summary "revert undiscussed era change" I would have realized that your edit was valid. Instead you left the edit summary blank. Surely you can see that if someone does not give a reason then other people will assume that you have no good reason. And why do you call that anon user a vandal when you did the same on the Gaddi Torso page? You seem unaware that the two styles have equal status and see a BCE for as a simple mistake.Dejvid (talk) 12:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

In fact (Dejvid and also Wetman) have been involved in a number of edits in which they have either blatantly or slyly changed the era setting on articles - always to displace the BC/AD system with the BCE convention. THAT is what Dejvid's motivation is and also why the previous July vandalism of Timeline of Canadian history was of no interest! --212.74.26.3 (talk) 13:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Notability?

CeCe Peniston may be notable but is this song notable?Dejvid (talk) 12:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, just noticed your message. You are right and I know what you mean, but my intention was to build the comprehensive discography of Peniston. Also, I am discussing the title with its producers and trying to get more details as for the release including possible chart positions. Benuliak (talk)

Kosovo

Hello,

I'm curious why you're disputing the fact that Kosovo became the crux or cradle of Serbian culture, religion and national identity, while not at all disputing the sentence about the Albanian national awakening. It is a wide known fact that Kosovo means a lot to the Serbian national spirit, anyone who does the tiniest bit of research will see that outright. Providing a reference for that, which is what I did, was the most absurd thing I have ever did on Misplaced Pages, because it's like asking a reference for the ocean being salty. I sincerely hope you didn't have a hidden agenda in your revert, as many on the Kosovo article do, because it just seems strange to me that someone would target a reference to what Kosovo means to the Serbs while being content with the introduction only discussing what Kosovo means to Albanians. The article, as I'm sure you'd agree, should be written in a fair manner, and the introduction carefully brushes any hint of the significance of Kosovo to the Serbs, perhaps due to the current political situation in the region. However, this is an encyclopaedia and we have an obligation to provide fair and unbalanced information not only for ourselves, but for future generations as well.

--Cinéma C 20:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. My reply is on Talk:Kosovo#the_cradle_of_Serbian_culture?.Dejvid (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Please participate in this discussion

You were involved in the old AfD for this article and I request that you leave a comment and your opinion on the question I have raised on the talk page. Thank you for your time. Silverseren 22:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The frogs seek a king

I'm at a loss to see what it is you're objecting to in the interpretation of the fable by Phaedrus, unless it is my generalising that it is his intention to demonstrate that the restraint of law is a good thing and that tyranny is not. The opening lines translate as follows:

Athenae cum florerent aequis legibus,
When the Athenians flourished with equal laws,
procax libertas civitatem miscuit,
Impudent liberty confounded (or stirred up) the state
frenumque solvit pristinum licentia.
And license loosened the former restraint (lit. rein).

It goes on to outline the historical context of a take-over of the state by a tyrant and how Aesop rationalised the situation. I must therefore ask you justify from the Latin that Aesop's moral is that a boring king is better than a 'glory seeker'. I think you're reading later interpretations of the story into a discussion in the article of what Phaedrus/Aesop is saying in the poem. I don't want to start an edit war, so I have left the tag in place until I have a clearer idea what point you're trying to make. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay, your translation seems much closer to your interpretation and you are right in suspecting that I was unable to read the Latin. Putting the translation into verse does seem to have done serious violence to the meaning. Putting my own interpretation (which was based on another version) in the edit description was probably a mistake when the actual query was closeness of your interpretation to the source.Dejvid (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Dejvid. I've removed the tag now we've sorted that out. Actually, I thought Christopher Smart's version was pretty close to the original, considering the restrictions of style. I'm not really a Latinist, so just to check I ran those lines through the function that gives word for word alternatives. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 23:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Cannae

Hi, I'm from Wp:Italy. I now you did this edit in the page Battle of Cannae, so I ask you if you could kindly answer the question at the and of the talk of the page. I would be very grateful to you, because in italian version near the sentence «He suggests that at the Battle of Zama Hannibal was quoted saying that he had fought Paullus at Cannae» there is the template:Please clarify. Thank you. --Innocenti Erleor (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Undue template

Dejvid, you have added the Undue template to the International recognition of Kosovo article, stating "over representation of views hostile to Kosovo". If you want this issue to be properly discussed, then you will need to create a new section on the talk page in which you put forward your arguments. I know you have already raised this issue in the "Libya and outdated info" section but this is getting lost amongst the wider discussion about Libya. I suggest you start a completely new section to make sure the discussion goes well. Regards, Bazonka (talk) 07:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Fair point - I'll need to take a little time to make a fair summary which doesn't just repeat myself.Dejvid (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Discussion about removal of adminship on shwiki

Kolega2357 has asked me to notify you of this discussion on shwiki. The reason they want to remove your adminship is inactivity. Regards, πr (t • c) 17:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Imaš odgovor tu u komentarima. --Kolega2357 (talk) 14:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army of the Vosges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Châtillon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dejvid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Uriah Rose

I'm working on him and am not near finished. deisenbe (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

July 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Stephanie Barrett. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

l

Works

Trasnslator ofThomas Paine : Common Sense, Theory and Practice of the Rights of Man, The Age of Reason, etc., he published many books, some of which were printed by order of the Convention: ..., Paris, 1793,

  • Fundamental bases of public education and of any free constitution (Bases fondamentales de l'instruction publique et de toute constitution libre), Paris, 1793, in-8deg., 190 p., Bibl. Nat. microfiche m. 5769.-
  • Organic division of citizens into tens, hundreds and thousands, with the means to make the best possible elections (Division organique des citoyens en dizaines, centaines et mille, avec les moyens de faire les meilleures élections possibles), Paris, year III
  • Right of citizenship, exercise of the sovereignty of the French people and guarantee of public freedom against the abuses of equality in law (Droit de cité, exercice de la souveraineté du peuple français et garantie de la liberté publique contre les abus de l'égalité en droit), Paris, year III
  • Inconveniences of the right of primogeniture, work in which it is demonstrated that any distinction between the children of the same family leads to a host of evils... and decision of MM. the doctors of the house and royal society of Navarre on primogeniture, Paris, n.d., in-8deg., XIV-224 p., Bibl. Nat. R.40734.-


  • Organic division of citizens into tens, hundreds and thousands, with the means to make the best possible elections, Paris, year III, in-8deg., 56 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le381620 bis.-
  • Right of citizenship, exercise of the sovereignty of the French people and guarantee of public freedom against the abuses of equality in law, Paris, year IIIn in-8deg., 20 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le381620.-
  • Inconveniences of the right of primogeniture, work in which it is demonstrated that any distinction between the children of the same family leads to a host of evils... and decision of MM. the doctors of the house and royal society of Navarre on primogeniture (), Paris, n.d., in-8deg., XIV-224 p., Bibl. Nat. R.40734.-
  • De la liberté indéfinie de la presse, et de l'importance de ne soumettre la communication de ses pensées qu'à l'opinion publique..., Paris, 1791, in-8deg., 37 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lb39 9992.-
  • Mesures de salut public, contre les obstacles intérieurs à l'établissement de la République, Paris, an III, in-8deg., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lb41 4081 (ndeg.s 1 et 4).-
  • M. Lamiral réfuté par lui-même, ou Réponse aux opinions de cet auteur sur l'abolition de la traite des Noirs, par un ami des blancs et des noirs, Paris, 1790, in-8deg., 80 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Lk9 102.-
  • Des sociétés populaires considérées comme une branche essentielle de l'instruction publique, Paris, 1792, in-8deg., 18 p., Bibl. Nat., microfiche m.5779.-
  • Convention nationale. Motif des opinions de F. Lanthenas sur le jugement de Louis XVI, (16 janvier 1793), Paris, s.d., in-8deg., 7 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 150.-
  • Convention nationale. Motifs de faire du 10 août un jubilé fraternel, en consacrant une déclaration des devoirs de l'homme (août 1793), Paris, 1793, in-8deg.,77 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38404.-
  • Convention nationale. Gouvernement révolutionnaire. Projet présenté (le 16 thermidor an II), Paris, s.d., in-8deg., 12 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 879.-
  • Convention nationale. Projet pour retirer une grande masse d'assignats, Paris, 14 pluviose an III, in-8deg., 43 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 1197.-
  • Convention nationale. Moyens de consolider la révolution du 9 thermidor... proposés dans la séance du 12 germinal an III, in-8deg., 7 p., Bibl. Nat. 8deg.Le38 1324.-
  • Nombreux autres ouvrages : voir le détail dans le Catalogue général des Livres imprimés de la Bibliothèque nationale.