| Revision as of 04:36, 3 February 2006 editCnwb (talk | contribs)7,523 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:27, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete''' as blatant advertising. --] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 01:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| adspam ] 00:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | adspam ] 00:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Delete''' Vanity, spam, cruft, advertisement ++] 00:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Delete''' Vanity, spam, cruft, advertisement ++] 00:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Delete''' per nom with extreme prejudice. --] 01:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Delete''' per nom with extreme prejudice. --] 01:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete, but not speedy''' - vanity, spam, cruft, and advertisement are not candidates for speedy deletion --]]]]] 01:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete, but not speedy''' - vanity, spam, cruft, and advertisement are not candidates for speedy deletion --]]]]] 01:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete'''. Blatant advertisement, vanity, spam, etc. ] 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''. Blatant advertisement, vanity, spam, etc. ] 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' per nom, sadly not eligible for speedying ] 02:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' per nom, sadly not eligible for speedying ] 02:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete'''. Vanity advertisement. ] 02:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''. Vanity advertisement. ] 02:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Advertising. ] 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Advertising. ] 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Obvious Keep'''. 200,000+ Google hits, recent coverage on CBS News, book released in December, now top 20 seller at Amazon, etc, etc, etc. '''Did anybody here make the slightest effort to cast an intelligent "vote"?''' A lousy article does not justify deleting a notable subject. ] 05:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*It's like rock scissors paper - "Vanity", "Advert", "NPOV", "Cruft", "Copyvio" and "Spam" all beat "Possibly notable subject matter". Oh, and congratulations on your little tirade there. I'll remember that one... ++] 17:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Obvious copyright violation''' -- or didn't you make the slightest effort to check the sales copy masquerading as an article ? --] | ] 06:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', blatant advertising. ] | ] 07:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Speedy redirect''' to ]. Failing that, '''Speedy delete''' copyvio CSD A8. Failing that, '''Delete'''. ] 07:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per all except Monicasdude. --]]]] (]) 12:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Speedy delete'''. Article begins: "The Sonoma Diet is like no other. It's a diet in which meals are about celebration, not deprivation!" ] 17:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 20:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Redirect''' to ].--] 21:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 11 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as blatant advertising. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Sonoma Diet
adspam Doctor Whom 00:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Vanity, spam, cruft, advertisement ++Deiz 00:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nom with extreme prejudice. --Aaron 01:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, but not speedy - vanity, spam, cruft, and advertisement are not candidates for speedy deletion --M@thwiz2020 01:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant advertisement, vanity, spam, etc. Royboycrashfan 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, sadly not eligible for speedying Hairy Dude 02:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity advertisement. *drew 02:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Advertising. Cnwb 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Obvious Keep. 200,000+ Google hits, recent coverage on CBS News, book released in December, now top 20 seller at Amazon, etc, etc, etc. Did anybody here make the slightest effort to cast an intelligent "vote"? A lousy article does not justify deleting a notable subject. Monicasdude 05:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- It's like rock scissors paper - "Vanity", "Advert", "NPOV", "Cruft", "Copyvio" and "Spam" all beat "Possibly notable subject matter". Oh, and congratulations on your little tirade there. I'll remember that one... ++Deiz 17:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Obvious copyright violation -- or didn't you make the slightest effort to check the sales copy masquerading as an article here? --Calton | Talk 06:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, blatant advertising. JIP | Talk 07:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect to food faddism. Failing that, Speedy delete copyvio CSD A8. Failing that, Delete. Ikkyu2 07:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all except Monicasdude. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 12:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Article begins: "The Sonoma Diet is like no other. It's a diet in which meals are about celebration, not deprivation!" Smerdis of Tlön 17:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 20:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to food faddism.--Isotope23 21:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.