| Revision as of 20:09, 23 August 2010 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Reminder: cmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:55, 18 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,028 edits not around since Sept 2011 | ||
| (952 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=23 September 2011}} | |||
| {{User:Shell Kinney/talkheader}} | {{User:Shell Kinney/talkheader}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 16 | ||
| |algo = old(240h) | |algo = old(240h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Shell Kinney/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Shell Kinney/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == pass-out teh baked goodies == | |||
| == Deleted Article ] == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| Hi, you deleted the article about a football referee ] due to his lack of ] which was probably spot on at the time. However, this guy has now been promoted to the ] who referee games in the Premier League and thus liable to become a higher profile person. | |||
| ] (]) has given you a ]! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <br /> | |||
| You will notice from the Select Group article that he is the only one who doesn't have an article. I suspect the very first controversial decision he makes would result in a lot of totally biased vitriol being written about him as a new article so it may be worth restoring the deleted one as a starting point. (I don't know if I've raised the query in the right way, so apologies if I haven't approached this request in the right manner.) | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| :So sorry I missed this message earlier. I wasn't sure if by your message you think that he's more notable now and that references would be available to create a proper article? If that's the case, I'd have no problem undeleting it so it can be updated/expanded. ] <sup>]</sup> 08:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}! | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 16 August 2010 == | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/{{#switch: 1 | |||
| | 1 = 2010-08-16 | |||
| | 2 = Volume 6, Issue 33 | |||
| | 3 = 2010-08-09 | |||
| | 4 = 2010-08-23 | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 09:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)</div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0064 --> | |||
| == Is your revert possibly overbroad? == | |||
| == Race and Intelligence Case == | |||
| {{Talkback|Geofferybard}} | |||
| Hi Shell... I noticed your recent votes on the R&I ArbCom case, and in particular your comments on Ludwigs2's views of the mediation. A couple of days ago I noticed mediation where Ludwigs2 was mediator, which was closed earlier today. The consensus conclusion of the mediation was to rename the article ] to ''Israel and Apartheid''. I took no part in the mediation or the article, having only come across it by accident. Ludwigs2's comments on the R&I PD talk page had made me wonder about judgment, and seeing this mediation and it's (in my opinion) potentially provocative conclusion made me wonder further. Consequently, I thought it worthwhile to provide you with a pointer to this other mediation case for your information, and in case it assisted you in your deliberations. I will post a note to Ludwigs2, advising that I have made this post, in the interests of transparency. ] (]) 06:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ]June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Having mediated a similar case before, I actually see a lot of good things that Ludwigs2 did there. He's tried to get everyone involved and reminded people along the way that the outcome isn't binding. There are times when a mediator has to say "well enough". The issue under discussion is so politically charged that you're very unlikely to get complete agreement no matter how much effort is put in. When arguments start to be repeated and things start to turn personal, it's often better to close a mediation - a mediation that ends with editors at each other's throats is often worse than no mediation at all.<p>That said, I'd be surprised if the decisions made during the mediation stand up outside of it; as I said, it simply too politically charged a subject for any reasoned discussion to prevail. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, thanks for your thoughts and perspective. I guess I was looking at the consensus conclusion and thinking that trying to implement it would be somewhere between provocative and explosive. Of course, the politically charge nature of the issue is not Ludwigs2's fault. ] (]) 07:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Questions about a deleted turquoise serpent == | |||
| == Clarification request == | |||
| It seems that an inexperienced editor is trying to ask you a question at ]. ] (]) 23:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Since you were the drafter of topic ban, could you please clarify whether edits like (notice the quote) and breach the letter or the spirit of the ban? The same question was recently by the restricted person himself, although after the edits. ] (]) 07:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| :If you have a concern that someone is violating a topic ban, ] is the appropriate venue, however I believe something was said during the proposed decision phase that historical articles hadn't been at issue before and weren't likely to be an issue. It would be terribly disappointing if the participants from that case started disputing with each other elsewhere :( ] <sup>]</sup> 08:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ::But was the topic ban meant to cover pre-1917 Russia or not? The wording is unclear. Personally, I interpret it as a topic ban from all articles related to Russia, since Russia is one of the "former Soviet republics". ] (]) 08:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm not going to take this to WP:AE, since I have no desire to play a part in the latest round of the ridiculous battleground initiated by Colchicum. But many people were looking for a clarification, but no one asked, so I did. ] (]) 09:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::No, it wasn't. The dispute was about the Soviet Union era and later. And honestly, if you want to drop the issue then perhaps you should stop watching what these folks are doing and commenting on it? Continuing to bring things up isn't disengaging. ] <sup>]</sup> 11:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == JanDeFietser == | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| * {{user-full|JanDeFietser}} | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| I am still of the belief that there is a simple and quiet way out of this, which I've been trying to keep from escalating to involve several other editors in a big row. I'd appreciate it if you or another arbitrator could take a look and see whether you can handle this off-wiki, privately. There's some sort of external dispute, here, in addition to the Dutch Misplaced Pages dispute, which the arbitration committee off-wiki is probably best placed to handle. I expect that JanDeFietser would also like this handled out of the public view of the other disputants, and (given the timing of the user page content relative to the AN/I discussion earlier this year, and xyr edits in the months since) I don't think that xe is intentionally trying to bring this into the English Misplaced Pages, and would be happy to find some route for xem to be able to go back to productive editing. I really hoped that this could have been handled without fuss, blocks, and palaver in just . But I think that we can still come back from the brink here, if arbitrators are willing to talk to JanDeFietser. ] (]) 14:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Reminder == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| {{cite web|url=http://www.chiroaccess.com/Articles/Death-by-Chiropractic-Another-Misbegotten-Review.aspx?id=0000190|author=Rosner, Anthony L.|title=Death by Chiropractic: Another Misbegotten Review|date=July 27, 2010|publisher=ChiroACCESS|accesddate=2010-08-22}} | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| Please remember this references is unreliable and does not belong in the chiropractic page. ] (]) 20:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| ⚫ | --] (]) 06:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:55, 18 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Shell Kinney has not edited Misplaced Pages since 23 September 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
pass-out teh baked goodies Gold Hat (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! Is your revert possibly overbroad? You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. User_talk:Geofferybard#Mothers_for_Peace:_Throwing_out_the_baby_with_the_bathwater.3F17:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Questions about a deleted turquoise serpentIt seems that an inexperienced editor is trying to ask you a question at Misplaced Pages talk:Uploading images#Newer version of a photograph. HLHJ (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:Desert Rose (Adenium obesum) pic.jpg The file File:Desert Rose (Adenium obesum) pic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
|
|||||||||
gmail.com
_pic.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pic.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pic.jpg){kind=link}