Misplaced Pages

William A. Dembski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:59, 24 August 2010 view sourceSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits copy edited lead, moved one unclear paragraph to talk← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:05, 29 October 2024 view source Headbomb (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors454,669 edits ce 
(508 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|American mathematician and proponent of intelligent design}}
{{Infobox person
{{pp|small=yes|indef=yes}}
| name = William A. Dembski
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2012}}
| image = Wad by wre 20060317 2972.JPG
{{Infobox philosopher
| image_size = 160px
| alt = photograph | name = William A. Dembski
| caption = | image = Dembski head shot.jpg
| birth_name = | image_size =
| birth_date = {{birth date|1960|07|18}} | alt = photograph
| birth_place = ] | caption = Dembski in 2006
| residence = | birth_name =
| nationality = | birth_date = {{birth date and age|1960|07|18}}
| known_for = ], ] | birth_place = ], U.S.
| television = | nationality =
| known_for = ]<br />]
| education = BA psychology (], 1981)<br/>MS statistics (University of Illinois at Chicago, 1983)<br/>SM mathematics (], 1985)<br/>PhD mathematics (University of Chicago, 1988)<br/>MA philosophy (University of Illinois at Chicago, 1993)<br/>MDiv theology (], 1996)<br/> PhD philosophy (University of Illinois at Chicago, 1996)
| television =
| employer = ]
| education = ] (], ], ])<br>{{nowrap|] (], ])}}<br>] (])
| organization =
| notable_works = | notable_works = '']'' (1998)
| influences = ] | awards =
| influenced = | website =
| occupation = Research professor in philosophy
| religion = Christian
| spouse = Jana L. Demski
| children =
| parents =
| relations =
| awards =
| website =
| box_width = 300px
}} }}
'''William Albert "Bill" Dembski''' (born July 18, 1960) is an American philosopher, known as a proponent of ] and the concept of ]. He is currently research professor of philosophy at the ] at Forth Worth, Texas, and a senior fellow of the ]'s ]. He is the author of a number of books about intelligent design, including ''The Design of Life'' (2007), ''The End of Christianity'' (2009), and ''Intelligent Design Uncensored'' (2010).


'''William Albert Dembski''' (born July 18, 1960) is an American ], ] and ]. He was a proponent of ] (ID) ],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Boudry |first1=Maarten |author-link1=Maarten Boudry |last2=Blancke |first2=Stefaan |last3=Braeckman |first3=Johan |author-link3=Johan Braeckman |date=December 2010 |title=Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience |journal=] |volume=85 |issue=4 |pages=473–482 |doi=10.1086/656904 |pmid=21243965|url=https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/952482/file/6828579.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/952482/file/6828579.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |hdl=1854/LU-952482 |s2cid=27218269 |hdl-access=free }} Article available from </ref> specifically the concept of ], and was a senior fellow of the ]'s ] (CSC).<ref name="Dembski_SF">{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/p/32 |title=William A. Dembski, Senior Fellow - CSC |website=] |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=January 10, 2014 |quote=A mathematician and philosopher, William A. Dembski is Senior Fellow with Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture.}}</ref> On September 23, 2016, he officially retired from intelligent design, resigning all his "formal associations with the ID community, including Discovery Institute fellowship of 20 years".<ref name="Official_Retirement">{{cite web |url=https://billdembski.com/personal/official-retirement-from-intelligent-design/ |title=Official Retirement from Intelligent Design |date=September 23, 2016 |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref> A February 2021 interview in the CSC's blog '']'' announced "his return to the intelligent design arena".<ref name="Evolution News 2021">{{cite web | title=William Dembski: Why I'm Returning to the Front Lines of Intelligent Design | website=Evolution News | date=16 February 2021 | url=https://evolutionnews.org/2021/02/william-dembski-why-im-returning-to-the-front-lines-of-intelligent-design/ | access-date=30 June 2021}}</ref>
The concept of intelligent design involves the argument that an overarching intelligence, as opposed to ], is responsible for life, and that it can be empirically detected.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_explfilter.htm|title=The Explanatory Filter: A three-part filter for understanding how to separate and identify cause from intelligent design|last=Dembski|first=William A. |date=1996 | accessdate = 2009-09-27}}
*{{cite news | last = Wallis | first = Claudia | title = The Evolution Wars | work =] |date=2005-08-07 | pages = | url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1090909-2,00.html}}
*{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/war.shtml|title=War on Science|last=BBC Home|date= 2006-01-26 |publisher= BBC |accessdate=2009-09-27}}
*{{cite web|url=Found at http://www.discovery.org/a/532|title=The Lynching of Bill Dembski: Scientists say the jury is out--so let the hanging begin.|last=Heeren|first=F|date=2000-11-15 | publisher= ] |accessdate=2009-09-27}}</ref> Dembski postulates that ] can be used to prove ], or what he calls specified complexity.<ref name="BETWEENSCIENCEAND">{{cite book|last=Dembski|first=William|title=Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology|year=2002|publisher=InterVarsity Press|isbn=083082314X, 9780830823147|page=312|url=http://books.google.com/?id=Sd8I7U3ryKAC&dq=Irreducible+complexity+dembski | page=10, 107}}</ref> The theory of intelligent design in general, and Dembski's specified complexity in particular, are arguments for ] that the scientific community has rejected as religion&mdash;and specifically ]&mdash;portraying itself as science.<ref>{{cite book |author= Edis T; Young M (eds.)|title=Why intelligent design fails: a scientific critique of the new creationism |publisher= ] |location=New Brunswick, N.J |year=2004 |pages= ; ; |isbn=081353433x |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>


In 2012, he taught as the Phillip E. Johnson Research Professor of Science and Culture at the ] in ], near ].<ref name="SEC_Faculty">{{cite web |url=http://ses.edu/academics/faculty/william-dembski |title=William Dembski |website=] |publisher=Southern Evangelical Seminary |location=Matthews, NC |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703104257/http://ses.edu/academics/faculty/william-dembski |archive-date=July 3, 2013 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>
== Biography ==
Dembski was born in ], ], the only child of ] parents, his mother an ] and his father a college professor and lecturer. His father held a ] in biology from the ] and taught ]; while growing up Dembski was neither particularly religious nor did he question the ].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_idcomingclean.htm | title = Intelligent Design Coming Clean | last = Dembski | first = WA | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2010-08-11 | date = </ref><ref name=InGod>{{cite news | url = http://www.houstonpress.com/2000-12-14/news/in-god-s-country/ | title = In God’s Country | work = ] | last = Kern | first = L | date = 2004-12-14 | accessdate = 2010-08-11 }}</ref> Dembski finished ] a year early, excelling in math and finishing a full course of ] in a single summer. After high school he was educated at an all-male ] in Chicago and pursued advanced mathematics courses at the ]. It was during this time that Dembski experienced educational and personal difficulties, struggling with the advanced courses and finding the unfamiliar social mileu of college challenging. An unhappy time in his life, Dembski dropped out of school and worked at his mother's art business while reading works on ] and the ]. Finding the creationist works interesting in their challenge of evolution but their literal interpretations lacking, Dembski returned to school at the ], studying ]. It was in 1988 at a ] on ] that Dembski began to believe that there was purpose, order and design in the universe due to the intervention of God.<ref name=InGod/> Remaining in academia Dembski pursued multiple degrees, ultimately completing an ] in ] (1981, ]), ] in statistics, mathematics and philosophy (1983, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1985, University of Chicago; 1993, University of Illinois at Chicago respectively), a ] in mathematics (1988, University of Chicago) and a ] in ] at the ] (1996).<ref name = CV>{{cite web | url = http://www.designinference.com/documents/PDF_Current_CV_Dembski.pdf | title = William Dembski Curriculum Vitae | date = 2010-05-01 | accessdate = 2010-08-11 | format = PDF }}</ref>


Dembski has written books about intelligent design, including '']'' (1998), '']'' (1999), '']'' (2004), ''The End of Christianity'' (2009), and ''Intelligent Design Uncensored'' (2010).
It was at the latter that Dembski met his wife Jana.<ref name = EndofChristianity>{{cite book |author=Dembski WA |title=The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World |publisher=B&H Academic |location= |year=2009 |pages= |isbn=0-8054-2743-0 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref> Dissatisfied with the "free-swinging academic style" of the school, Dembski also was involved a group known as the "] Society". Based on the works of the 19th century thinker Charles Hodge, the group was devoted to strengthening the faith of students faced with what members believed to be the "theological disarray" of the times, and to provide an example of how to oppose "false and destructive ideas." It published a journal (a recreation of the '']'') and met with considerable opposition on the campus, facing two ]s, threats of violence, accusations of racism and sexism, denied funding and told that membership "jeopardized their academic advancement".<ref>{{cite book |author=Richards JW; Dembski WA |title=Unapologetic Apologetics: Meeting the Challenges of Theological Studies |publisher= ] |location=Downers Grove, Ill |year=2001 |pages= |isbn=0-8308-1563-5 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate= | chapter = Reclaiming theological education | }}</ref>


Intelligent design is the argument that an intelligent cause is responsible for the complexity of life and that one can detect that cause ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_explfilter.htm |title=The Explanatory Filter: A three-part filter for understanding how to separate and identify cause from intelligent design |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1996 |type="An excerpt from a paper presented at the ], originally titled 'Redesigning Science.'" |access-date=September 27, 2009 }} See Chapter 4 of ''Mere Creation'' (1998), .
Dembski and his wife have one daughter and two sons. One of his sons is ] and Dembski has attributed some of his son's problems to vaccines<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.premierradio.org.uk/listen/ondemand.aspx?mediaid={B937E7AD-5935-47FE-AF63-E57DF56F5B01} |title="Finding a Good God in an Evil World" Bill Dembski & Norman Hansen debate the problem of Evil. (41:00) |publisher=]|author=|date=Jan 9, 2010|accessdate=Jan 10, 2010}}</ref> though the scientific consensus is that vaccines are unrelated to autism.<ref>{{cite pmid | 17471032}}</ref>
*{{cite magazine |last=Wallis |first=Claudia |date=August 7, 2005 |title=The Evolution Wars |magazine=] |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1090909-2,00.html |access-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-date=November 4, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104061455/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1090909-2,00.html |url-status=dead }}
*{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=A War on Science |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/war.shtml |work=Science & Nature: TV & Radio Follow-up |location=London |publisher=] |access-date=September 27, 2009 }}
**{{cite episode |title=A War on Science |episode-link=List of Horizon episodes#Series 42: 2005-2006 |series=] |network=BBC |date=January 26, 2006 |series-no=42 |number=13}}
*{{cite news |last=Heeren |first=Fred |url=http://www.spectator.org/archives/0011TAS/heeren0011.htm |title=The Lynching of Bill Dembski |date=November 2000 |work=] |location=Arlington, VA |publisher=American Spectator Foundation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001116075653/http://www.spectator.org/archives/0011TAS/heeren0011.htm |archive-date=November 16, 2000 |access-date=September 27, 2009 }}</ref> Dembski postulated that ] can be used to prove ] (IC) and what he called "]."<ref name="Dembsky1999">], pp. 10, 107</ref> The scientific community sees intelligent design—and Dembski's concept of specified complexity—as a form of ] attempting to portray itself as science.<ref>], , , </ref>

==Biography==
Dembski was born in ], the only child of Catholic parents. His mother was an ] and his father was a college professor who held a ] in ] from the ] and taught ]. While growing up, Dembski was neither particularly religious nor did he question the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_idcomingclean.htm |title=Intelligent Design Coming Clean |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=November 17, 2000 |website=] |location=Colorado Springs, CO |access-date=August 11, 2010}}</ref><ref name="InGod">{{cite news |last=Kern |first=Lauren |date=December 14, 2000 |title=In God's Country |url=http://www.houstonpress.com/2000-12-14/news/in-god-s-country/full/ |newspaper=] |location=Houston, TX |publisher=] |oclc=29800759 |access-date=August 11, 2010}}</ref>

Dembski attended an all-male Catholic preparatory school in Chicago. He finished high school a year early, excelling in math and finishing a ] course in one summer. After high school, Dembski attended the ], where he experienced educational and personal difficulties, struggling with the advanced courses and finding the unfamiliar social milieu of college challenging. He dropped out of school and worked at his mother's art business while reading works on creationism and the ]. Finding the creationist works interesting in their challenge of evolution but their literal interpretations lacking, Dembski returned to school at the ], studying ].<ref name="InGod" />

It was in 1988 at a ] on ] that Dembski began to believe that there was purpose, order, and design in the universe by the intervention of ].<ref name="InGod" /> Remaining in academia, Dembski ultimately completed an undergraduate degree in ] at the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1981 and master's degrees in statistics, mathematics, and philosophy (1983, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1985, University of Chicago; 1993, University of Illinois at Chicago, respectively), two ]s, one in mathematics and one in philosophy (1988, University of Chicago; 1996, University of Illinois at Chicago, respectively), and a ] in ] at the ] (1996).<ref name="CV">{{cite web |url=http://designinference.com/dembski-on-intelligent-design/dembski-curriculum-vitae-resume/ |title=CV/Resumé of William A. Dembski |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>

At the Princeton Theological Seminary, Dembski met his future wife, Jana.<ref>], </ref> Dissatisfied with what he called the "free-swinging academic style" of the school, Dembski also was involved in a group known as the Charles Hodge Society. Based on the works of the 19th century thinker ], the group was devoted to strengthening the faith of students faced with what members believed to be the "theological disarray" of the times, and to providing an example of how to oppose "false and destructive ideas." It published a journal (a recreation of the '']'' (1903–1929)) and met with considerable opposition on the campus, facing two ]s, threats of violence, accusations of racism and sexism; being denied funding; and hearing that membership "jeopardized their academic advancement."<ref name="Dembski_Richards2001">], "Introduction: Reclaiming Theological Education," (PDF)</ref>

Dembski and Jana have one daughter and two sons. One of his sons has ] and Dembski has attributed some of his son's problems to ]s.<ref>{{cite podcast |url=http://www.premierradio.org.uk/listen/ondemand.aspx?mediaid={B937E7AD-5935-47FE-AF63-E57DF56F5B01} |title=Bill Dembski & Norman Hansen on Natural Evil |website=Unbelievable? |publisher=] |host=Brierley, Justin |date=January 9, 2010 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Early opposition to evolution=== ===Early opposition to evolution===
Dembski holds that his knowledge of statistics, and general skepticism concerning evolutionary theory, led him to believe that the extraordinary diversity of life was statistically unlikely to have been produced by ].<ref name = InGod/> He presented these thoughts in his 1991 paper 'Randomness by Design', which appeared in the journal '']''.<ref>{{cite journal | journal = ] | volume = 25 | pages = 75-108 | url = http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.09.rndmnsbydes.pdf | title = Randomness by Design | last = Dembski | first = WA | year = 1991 | issue = 1 | accessdate = 2010-08-11 | format = PDF }}</ref> These ideas led to his notion of ], which he developed in '']'', a revision of his PhD dissertation in philosophy. Dembski holds that his knowledge of statistics and his skepticism concerning ] led him to believe that the extraordinary diversity of life was statistically unlikely to have been produced by ].<ref name="InGod" /> His first significant contribution to intelligent design was his 1991 paper, "Randomness by Design," published in the philosophy journal '']''.<ref>]</ref><ref name="Writings">{{cite web |url=http://designinference.com/dembski-on-intelligent-design/dembski-writings/ |title=Writings of William A. Dembski |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


Lawyer ]'s first book '']'' (published in 1991) attracted a group of scholars<ref>], 2004, p. .</ref> who shared his view that the exclusion of ] explanations by the ] was unfair and had led to the ] ruling that teaching ] in ] was unconstitutional. Dembski was part of that group at a symposium at ] in ] in March 1992, before they came to call themselves "]".<ref name=bfwedge>], . Talk Reason, Chapter 1 of the book "Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics" (MIT Press, 2001). Retrieved 2007-05-28.</ref> The phrase "]" had been adopted in 1987 in drafts of the high school textbook '']'' as a substitute for "creation science" to refer to the idea that there is ] evidence that life was ] through unspecified processes by an intelligent but unidentified designer. This change was intended to obviate the ] ruling, and the textbook was published in 1989 amidst campaigning by the publisher for the introduction of "intelligent design" into school science classes. Biochemist ], another member of "The Wedge", contributed the argument that he subsequently called "]" (IC) to the second edition of ''Pandas'' in 1993. The textbook contained concepts which Dembski later elaborated in his treatment of "]" (SC).<ref> (pdf) A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy Barbara Forrest. May, 2007.<br> by Nicholas J Matzke, NCSE Public Information Project Specialist</ref> Former UC Berkeley law school professor ]'s book '']'' (1991) attracted a group of scholars<ref>], </ref> who shared his view that the exclusion of ] explanations by the ] was unfair and had led to the '']'' ruling that teaching ] in ] was unconstitutional. Dembski was part of that group at a symposium at ] in ], in March 1992, before they came to call themselves "]."<ref name="bfwedge">]</ref>

Dembski wrote a contribution to the 1994 book ''The Creation Hypothesis''. Another chapter, contributed by the creationists ] and ], discussed "design detection" and redefined "]" as a way of measuring information.<ref name="NCSE Orgel">{{cite web | title=Review: Origins of Life | website=NCSE | url=http://ncse.com/rncse/27/3-4/review-origins-life | access-date=1 June 2016| date=2015-12-15 }}</ref>
These ideas led to Dembski's notion of specified complexity, which he developed in ''The Design Inference'', a 1998 revision of his PhD dissertation in philosophy.<ref>], p. xv</ref>

In 1987, the phrase "intelligent design" replaced "creation science" in drafts of a book, '']'', that was intended for secondary school students. The phrase referred to the idea that life was ] through unspecified processes by an intelligent but unidentified designer. The book asserted that there was a logical need for such a designer because of the appearance of design in biological organisms. This replacement was intended to evade the ''Edwards v. Aguillard'' ruling. The book was published in 1989 amidst campaigning by the publisher for the introduction of "intelligent design" into school science classes.

Biochemist ], another member of "The Wedge," contributed the argument that he subsequently called "irreducible complexity" to a subsequent edition of ''Pandas'' in 1993. The book contained concepts which Dembski later elaborated in his treatment of "specified complexity."<ref name="Forrest2007">{{cite web |url=http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Understanding The Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals |last=Forrest |first=Barbara |date=May 2007 |website=] |publisher=Center for Inquiry |location=Washington, D.C. |access-date=January 10, 2014}}
*{{cite journal |last=Matzke |first=Nicholas J. |author-link=Nick Matzke |date=September–October 2004 |title=Design on Trial in Dover, Pennsylvania |url=http://ncse.com/rncse/24/5/design-trial-dover-pennsylvania |journal=Reports of the National Center for Science Education |volume=24 |issue=5 |pages=4–9 |issn=2158-818X |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Discovery Institute=== ===Discovery Institute===
{{Main|Discovery Institute}}
After completing graduate school in 1996, Dembski was unable to secure a university position; from then until 1999 he received what he calls "a standard academic salary" of $40,000 a year as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the ]'s ] (CSC). "I was one of the early beneficiaries of Discovery largess," says Dembski.<ref>, Jodi Wolgoren, ], August 21, 2005</ref>
After completing graduate school in 1996, Dembski was unable to secure a university position; from then until 1999 he received what he calls "a standard academic salary" of $40,000 a year as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. "I was one of the early beneficiaries of Discovery largess," says Dembski.<ref>{{cite news |last=Wilgoren |first=Jodi |date=August 21, 2005 |title=Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/national/21evolve.html?pagewanted=all |newspaper=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>
As of 2008, Dembski serves as a senior fellow at the CSC,<ref name = WDDI>{{cite web | url = http://www.discovery.org/p/32 | title = William A. Dembski, Senior Fellow - CSC | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2010-08-24 | date = n.d. }}</ref> where he plays a central role in the center's extensive public and political campaigns advancing the concept of intelligent design and its teaching in public schools through its "]" campaign as part of the institute's ].

Until September 2016, Dembski served as a senior fellow at the CSC,<ref name="Dembski_SF" /> where he played a central role in the center's extensive public and political campaigns advancing the concept of intelligent design and its teaching in public schools through its "]" campaign as part of the institute's ]. He has since resigned his fellowship position with the Discovery Institute.


===Baylor University=== ===Baylor University===

====Michael Polanyi Center controversy==== ====Michael Polanyi Center controversy====
{{Main|Michael Polanyi Center}} {{Main|Michael Polanyi Center}}
In 1999, Dembski was invited by ], President of ], to establish the ] at the university. Named after the Hungarian physical chemist and philosopher ] (1891&ndash;1976), Dembski described it as "the first intelligent design think tank at a research university". Dembski had known Sloan for about three years, having taught Sloan's daughter at a Christian study summer camp not far from ]. Sloan was the first ] minister to serve as Baylor's president in over 30 years, had read some of Dembski's work and liked it; according to Dembski, Sloan "made it clear that he wanted to get me on the faculty in some way".<ref name="monkey business">{{cite news In 1999, Dembski was invited by ], President of ], to establish the ] at the university. Named after the Hungarian physical chemist and philosopher ] (1891–1976), Dembski described it as "the first intelligent design think tank at a research university." Dembski had known Sloan for about three years, having taught Sloan's daughter at a Christian study summer camp not far from ]. Sloan was the first ] minister to serve as Baylor's president in over 30 years, had read some of Dembski's work and liked it; according to Dembski, Sloan "made it clear that he wanted to get me on the faculty in some way."<ref name="monkey business">{{cite news |last=Kern |first=Lauren |date=January 11, 2001 |orig-year=Originally published 2000 as "In God's Country"; ''Houston Press'' (Houston, TX: Voice Media Group) |title=Monkey Business |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_dallasobserver0101.htm |newspaper=] |location=Dallas, TX |publisher=Voice Media Group |issn=0732-0299 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> The salaries were supported by a grant from the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Forrest |first1=Barbara |last2=Gross |first2=Paul R. |title=Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design |date=2007 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780195319736 |page=306 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7mMSDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA306 |language=en}}</ref>
| author = Lauren Kern
| title = Monkey Business
| url = http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_dallasobserver0101.htm
| work = ]
| date = January 11, 2001
| accessdate = 2008-03-14
}}</ref>


The Polanyi Center was established without much publicity in October 1999, initially consisting of two people &mdash; Dembski and a like-minded colleague, ], who were hired directly by Sloan without going through the usual channels of a search committee and departmental consultation. The vast majority of Baylor staff did not know of the center's existence until its website went online, and the center stood outside of the existing religion, science, and philosophy departments. The Polanyi Center was established without much publicity in October 1999, initially consisting of two people Dembski and a like-minded colleague, ], who were hired directly by Sloan without going through the usual channels of a search committee and departmental consultation. The vast majority of Baylor staff did not know of the center's existence until its website went online, and the center stood outside of the existing religion, science, and philosophy departments.


The center's mission, and the lack of consultation with the Baylor faculty, became the immediate subject of controversy. The faculty feared for the university's reputation &ndash; it has historically been well-regarded for its contributions to mainstream science &ndash; and scientists outside the university questioned whether Baylor had "gone fundamentalist".<ref name="monkey business"/> Faculty members pointed out that the university's existing interdisciplinary ] was already addressing questions about the relationship between science and religion, making the existence of the Polanyi Center somewhat redundant. In April 2000, Dembski hosted a conference on "naturalism in science" sponsored by the ] and the hub of the intelligent design movement, the ], seeking to address the question "Is there anything beyond nature?". Most of the Baylor faculty boycotted the conference. The center's mission, and the lack of consultation with the Baylor faculty, became the immediate subject of controversy. The faculty feared for the university's reputation it has historically been well regarded for its contributions to mainstream science and scientists outside the university questioned whether Baylor had "gone fundamentalist."<ref name="monkey business" /> Faculty members pointed out that the university's existing interdisciplinary ] was already addressing questions about the relationship between science and religion, making the existence of the Polanyi Center somewhat redundant. In April 2000, Dembski hosted a conference on "naturalism in science" sponsored by the ] and the hub of the intelligent design movement, the Discovery Institute, seeking to address the question "Is there anything beyond nature?" Most of the Baylor faculty boycotted the conference.


A few days later, the Baylor faculty senate voted by a margin of 27&ndash;2 to ask the administration to dissolve the center and merge it with the Institute for Faith and Learning. President Sloan refused, citing issues of censorship and academic integrity, but agreed to convene an outside committee to review the center. The committee recommended setting up a faculty advisory panel to oversee the science and religion components of the program, dropping the name "Michael Polanyi" and reconstituting the center as part of the Institute for Faith and Learning.<ref></ref> These recommendations were accepted in full by the university administration. A few days later, the Baylor faculty senate voted by a margin of 27–2 to ask the administration to dissolve the center and merge it with the Institute for Faith and Learning. President Sloan refused, citing issues of censorship and academic integrity, but agreed to convene an outside committee to review the center. The committee recommended setting up a faculty advisory panel to oversee the science and religion components of the program, dropping the name "Michael Polanyi" and reconstituting the center as part of the Institute for Faith and Learning.<ref name="Polanyireport">{{cite web |url=http://pr.baylor.edu/pdf/001017polanyi.pdf |title=Polanyi Review Committee Report - 001017polanyi.pdf |last=Cooper |first=William F. (External Review Committee Chairman) |date=October 16, 2000 |website=pr.baylor.edu |publisher=] |location=Waco, TX |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030310061855/http://pr.baylor.edu/pdf/001017polanyi.pdf |archive-date=March 10, 2003 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> These recommendations were accepted in full by the university administration.


In a subsequent press release, Dembski asserted that the committee had given an "unqualified affirmation of my own work on intelligent design", that its report "marks the triumph of intelligent design as a legitimate form of academic inquiry" and that "dogmatic opponents of design who demanded that the Center be shut down have met their Waterloo. Baylor University is to be commended for remaining strong in the face of intolerant assaults on freedom of thought and expression." <ref>http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_upicommentary1200.htm</ref> In a subsequent press release, Dembski asserted that the committee had given an "unqualified affirmation of my own work on intelligent design," that its report "marks the triumph of intelligent design as a legitimate form of academic inquiry" and that "dogmatic opponents of design who demanded the Center be shut down have met their Waterloo. Baylor University is to be commended for remaining strong in the face of intolerant assaults on freedom of thought and expression."<ref name="Dembski_PR-2000-10-17">{{cite web |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2007.12.MPC_Rise_and_Fall.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080106063508/http://www.designinference.com/documents/2007.12.MPC_Rise_and_Fall.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 6, 2008 |title=Polanyi Center Press Release |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=October 17, 2000 |access-date=January 10, 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Siemon-Netto |first=Uwe |author-link=Uwe Siemon-Netto |date=December 21, 2000 |title=Commentary: It's Perilous to Ponder the Design of the Universe |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_upicommentary1200.htm |agency=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


Dembski's remarks were criticized by other members of the Baylor faculty, who protested that they were both an unjustified attack on his critics at Baylor and a false assertion that the university endorsed Dembski's controversial views on intelligent design. Charles Weaver, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor and one of the most vocal critics of the Polanyi Center, commented: "In academic arguments, we don't seek utter destruction and defeat of our opponents. We don't talk about Waterloos." Dembski's remarks were criticized by other members of the Baylor faculty, who protested that they were both an unjustified attack on his critics at Baylor and a false assertion that the university endorsed Dembski's controversial views on intelligent design. Charles Weaver, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor and one of the most vocal critics of the Polanyi Center, commented: "In academic arguments, we don't seek utter destruction and defeat of our opponents. We don't talk about Waterloos."<ref name="InGod" />


President Sloan asked Dembski to withdraw his press release, but Dembski refused, accusing the university of "intellectual ]" (borrowing a phrase that Sloan himself had used when they first tried to dissolve the center). He declared that the university's action had been taken "in the utmost of bad faith ... thereby providing the fig leaf of justification for my removal."<ref>, Oct 19, 2000</ref> Professor Michael Beaty, director of the Institute for Faith and Learning, said that Dembski's remarks violated the spirit of cooperation that the committee had advocated and stated that "Dr. Dembski's actions after the release of the report compromised his ability to serve as director."<ref>, October 19, 2000</ref> Dembski was removed as the center's director, although he remained an associate research professor until May 2005. He was not asked to teach any courses in that time and instead worked from home, writing books and speaking around the country. "In a sense, Baylor did me a favor," he said. "I had a five-year sabbatical."<ref>http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/10/the-pseudo-scie.html</ref> President Sloan asked Dembski to withdraw his press release, but Dembski refused, accusing the university of "intellectual ]" (borrowing a phrase that Sloan himself had used when they first tried to dissolve the center). He declared that the university's action had been taken "in the utmost of bad faith ... thereby providing the fig leaf of justification for my removal."<ref name="Dembski_PR-2000-10-19">{{cite web |url=http://www.antievolution.org/people/dembski_wa/metanews_20001020_wad.txt |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020628233524/http://www.antievolution.org/people/dembski_wa/metanews_20001020_wad.txt |url-status=usurped |archive-date=June 28, 2002 |title=Statement by William Dembski on His Removal as Director of the Michael Polanyi Center at Baylor University |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=October 19, 2000 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Professor Michael Beaty, director of the Institute for Faith and Learning, said that Dembski's remarks violated the spirit of cooperation that the committee had advocated and stated that "Dr. Dembski's actions after the release of the report compromised his ability to serve as director."<ref name="Brumley_PR-2000-10-19">{{cite web |url=http://www.antievolution.org/people/dembski_wa/metanews_20001019_brumley.txt |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020628233618/http://www.antievolution.org/people/dembski_wa/metanews_20001019_brumley.txt |url-status=usurped |archive-date=June 28, 2002 |title=Dembski relieved of duties as Polanyi Center Director |last=Brumley |first=Larry |date=October 19, 2000 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Dembski was removed as the center's director, although he remained an associate research professor until May 2005. He was not asked to teach any courses in that time and instead worked from home, writing books and speaking around the country. "In a sense, Baylor did me a favor," he said. "I had a five-year sabbatical."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/10/the-pseudo-scie.html |title=The Pseudo-Science Amicus Brief in ''Kitzmiller'' |last=Sandefur |first=Timothy |date=October 4, 2005 |website=] |publisher=The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. |location=Houston, TX |type=Blog |access-date=July 26, 2013}}</ref>


===Seminary teaching=== ===Seminary teaching===


From 1999 to 2005, he was on the faculty of ], where he was a focus of attention and controversy. During the academic year 2005-6, he was briefly the Carl F. H. Henry Professor of Theology and Science at the ] in ], as well as the first director of the school's new Center for Theology and Science (since replaced by prominent creationist ]).<ref><cite>Creationist to will lead seminary science center</cite> Peter Smith. The Courier-Journal, April 17, 2006 (article available for a fee at )</ref> The seminary teaches creationism but its professors vary on the details, with most adhering to the ] viewpoint of a relatively recent creation which occurred literally as described in ]; Dembski does not hold to Young Earth creationism. On his position at Southern, Dembski also remarked that "Theology is where my ultimate passion is and I think that is where I can uniquely contribute."<ref> Jeff Robinson. Baptist Press, September 16, 2004</ref> He left Southern in May 2006.<ref name="SouthwesternBio">{{cite news | url=http://www.swbts.edu/index.cfm?pageid=800&enc=495E4B4A5433392C23442550435120415379 | title=School of Theology: William Dembski | publisher=] |date=2009 | first= | last= | accessdate =2009-04-01 }}</ref> Starting in June 2006 he became a professor in philosophy at ] in ]. Since taking up a position within Southwestern's School of Theology in June 2006, Dembski has taught a number of courses within its Department of Philosophy of Religion.<ref>, ]</ref><ref name="'Teaching' page">, Dembski's personal website</ref> For some of his courses, he requires that his students promote Intelligent Design on "hostile" websites for course credit.<ref name="'Teaching' page"/> The ] operates both seminaries. From 1999 to 2005, he was on the faculty of Baylor University, where he was a focus of attention and controversy. During the academic year 2005–2006, he was briefly the ''] Professor of Theology and Science'' at the ] in ], as well as the first director of the school's new Center for Theology and Science (since replaced by prominent creationist ]).<ref>{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Peter |date=April 16, 2006 |title=Creationist to will lead seminary science center |url=http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20060417/NEWS01/604170363/Creationist-will-lead-seminary-science-center |newspaper=] |location=Louisville, KY |publisher=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> The seminary teaches creationism but its professors vary on the details, with most adhering to the ] viewpoint of a relatively recent creation which occurred literally as described in ]; Dembski does not hold to young Earth creationism (YEC). On his position at Southern, Dembski also remarked that "Theology is where my ultimate passion is and I think that is where I can uniquely contribute."<ref name="Robinson">{{cite news |last=Robinson |first=Jeff |date=September 16, 2004 |title=Dembski to head seminary's new science & theology center |url=http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=19115 |work=] |location=Nashville, TN |publisher=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> He left Southern in May 2006.<ref name="SouthwesternBio">{{cite web |url=http://www.swbts.edu/index.cfm?pageid=800&enc=495E4B4A5433392C23442550435120415379 |title=School of Theology - Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary: William Dembski |website=] |publisher=Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary |location=Fort Worth, TX |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120505085004/http://swbts.edu/index.cfm?pageid=800&enc=%20495E4B4A5433392C23442550435120415379 |archive-date=May 5, 2012 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Starting in June 2006 he became a professor in philosophy at ] (SWBTS) in ]. Since taking up a position within Southwestern's School of Theology in June 2006, Dembski has taught a number of courses within its Department of Philosophy of Religion.<ref name="SouthwesternBio" /><ref name="'Teaching' page">{{cite web |url=http://designinference.com/dembski-on-intelligent-design/dembski-teaching/ |title=Teaching: Courses taught by William A. Dembski |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> For some of his courses, he requires that his students promote intelligent design on "hostile" websites for course credit.<ref name="'Teaching' page" /> The ] operates both seminaries.


In September 2007, the SWBTS hosted a conference on 'Intelligent Design in Business Practice', presented by Dembski, ] theologian ], and three business academics presently or formerly teaching at universities in the Southern United States.<ref>See "What's new" http://www.religionlink.com/tip_071008.php</ref> In September 2007, the SWBTS hosted a conference, "Intelligent Design in Business Practice," presented by Dembski, ] theologian ], and three business academics presently or formerly teaching at universities in the Southern United States.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.religionlink.com/tip_071008.php |title=Evolution vs. intelligent design: The battle continues |date=October 8, 2007 |website=ReligionLink |publisher=]; ] |location=Westerville, OH |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110817210402/http://www.religionlink.com/tip_071008.php |archive-date=August 17, 2011 |access-date=January 10, 2014 }} Current version and URL of the article {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140110094817/http://www.religionlink.com/source-guides/evolution-vs-intelligent-design-the-battle-continues/ |date=January 10, 2014 }}.</ref>


====Mims-Pianka controversy==== ====Mims–Pianka controversy====
{{Main|Mims-Pianka controversy}} {{Main|Eric Pianka}}
On April 2, 2006, Dembski stated on his blog that he reported Eric Pianka to the ] because he and fellow Discovery Institute Fellow ] felt that ] while accepting the Texas Academy of Science's Distinguished Texas Scientist Award in 2006 fomented ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/eric-pianka-time-for-an-interview-with-the-department-of-homeland-security/ |title=Eric Pianka: The Department of Homeland Security needs to interview you |last=Dembski |first=William |date=April 2, 2006 |website=Uncommon Descent |publisher=Uncommon Descent, Inc. |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> This resulted in the ] interviewing Pianka in Austin.<ref>{{cite news |last=Heinauer |first=Laura |date=April 5, 2006 |title=Professor's population speeches unnerve some |url=http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/04/5PIANKA.html |newspaper=] |location=Austin, TX |publisher=] |issn=1553-8451 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427212600/http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/04/5PIANKA.html |archive-date=April 27, 2006 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> On April 5, Dembski wagered that Pianka's popularity would drop if the full text of his speech to the Texas Academy of Science were made public.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/1000-reward-and-1000-bet-pianka-again/ |title= $1000 reward and $1000 bet — Pianka again |last=Dembski |first=William |date=April 6, 2006 |website=Uncommon Descent |publisher=Uncommon Descent, Inc. |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>

On April 2, 2006, Dembski stated on his blog that he reported ] to the ] because he and fellow Discovery Institute Fellow ] felt that ] while accepting the Texas Academy of Sciences Distinguished Scientist of the Year award in 2006 fomented bioterrorism.<ref>, William Dembski</ref> This resulted in the ] interviewing Pianka in Austin.<ref>{{Waybackdate|site=http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/04/5PIANKA.html|date=20060427212600|title=Professor's population speeches unnerve some}}</ref>

On April 5 Dembski wagered that Pianka's popularity would drop if the full text of his speech to the Texas Academy of Sciences was made public.<ref> William Dembski. Uncommon Descent.</ref>


====Baylor Evolutionary Informatics Lab controversy==== ====Baylor Evolutionary Informatics Lab controversy====
Subsequently in July and August 2007, Dembski played a central role in the formation of the<ref> Andrea Bottaro. Panda's Thumb, September 7, 2007.</ref> ] (EIL), formed by ] Engineering Professor ]. According to Baylor administration, the EIL website hosted at Baylor was deleted because it violated university policy forbidding professors from creating the impression that their personal views represent Baylor as an institution. Citing other similar Baylor faculty research web sites not explicitly approved by Baylor. Dembski<ref> William A. Dembski, "FIRST-PERSON: Vindication for I.D. at Baylor?," Baptist Press, May 6, 2010</ref> says the website was removed because it dealt with ]. Baylor said they would permit Marks to repost his website on their server, provided a 108 word disclaimer <ref> Mark Bergin, "Baylor’s treatment of an ID-advancing research lab has shifted from friendly to fire," September 14, 2007.</ref> accompany any intelligent design-advancing research to make clear that the work does not represent the university's position.<ref>, Evolution News & Views, ]</ref><ref>, Mark Bergin, World Magazine</ref><ref>Baylor U. Removes a Web Page Associated With Intelligent Design From Its Site by Elizabeth F. Farrell. ''Chronicle of Higher Education, Sept. 4, 2007. ''subscription access''</ref> The site<ref> The Evolutionary Informatics Lab.</ref> Subsequently, in July and August 2007, Dembski played a central role in the formation of the ] (EIL), cofounded with Baylor University Engineering Professor ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/02/the_evolutionar056061.html |title=The Evolutionary Informatics Lab: Putting Intelligent Design Predictions to the Test |last=Luskin |first=Casey |date=February 7, 2012 |website=Evolution News & Views |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> According to Baylor administration, the EIL website hosted at Baylor was deleted because it violated university policy forbidding professors from creating the impression that their personal views represent Baylor as an institution. Dembski says the website was removed because it dealt with intelligent design.<ref>{{cite news |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=May 6, 2010 |title=FIRST-PERSON: Vindication for I.D. at Baylor? |url=http://www.bpnews.net/BPFirstPerson.asp?ID=32885 |work=Baptist Press |location=Nashville, TN |publisher=Southern Baptist Convention |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Baylor said they would permit Marks to repost his website on their server, provided a 108-word disclaimer<ref>{{cite journal |last=Bergin |first=Mark |date=September 15, 2007 |title=Not so fast |url=http://www.worldmag.com/2007/09/not_so_fast |journal=] |volume=22 |issue=33 |issn=0888-157X |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> accompany any intelligent design-advancing research to make clear that the work does not represent the university's position.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/07/william_dembski_addresses_fort003949.html |title=William Dembski Addresses Forthcoming Intelligent Design Research that Advances ID and Answers Critics (updated) |last=Luskin |first=Casey |date=July 22, 2007 |website=Evolution News & Views |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Bergin |first=Mark |date=August 25, 2007 |title=Crisis averted |url=http://www.worldmag.com/2007/08/crisis_averted |journal=World |volume=22 |issue=31 |issn=0888-157X |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Farrell |first=Elizabeth F. |date=September 4, 2007 |title=Baylor U. Removes a Web Page Associated With Intelligent Design From Its Site |url=http://chronicle.com/article/Baylor-U-Removes-a-Web-Pag/121996/ |newspaper=] |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education Inc. |issn=0009-5982 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> The site now resides on a third-party server and still contains the material advancing intelligent design.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.evoinfo.org/index/ |title=The Evolutionary Informatics Lab - EvoInfo.org |website=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Dembski's participation was funded by a $30,000 grant from the Lifeworks Foundation, which is controlled by researcher Brendan Dixon of the ] (which has close ties to the Discovery Institute).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org//990pf_pdf_archive/911/911942043/911942043_200612_990PF.pdf |title=031248d0.tif - 911942043_200612_990PF.pdf |type=] |access-date=January 10, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207032841/http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org//990pf_pdf_archive/911/911942043/911942043_200612_990PF.pdf |archive-date=February 7, 2012 |df=mdy-all }} Return of Private Foundation (2006): The Lifeworks Foundation.</ref>

now resides on a third-party server and still contains the material advancing intelligent design. Dembski's participation was funded by a $30,000 grant from the Lifeworks Foundation, which is controlled by researcher Brendan Dixon of the ] (which has close ties to the ]).<ref>, Andrea Bottaro, ] </ref><ref></ref>
====Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary flood controversy====
While serving as a professor at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Dembski wrote ''The End of Christianity'', which argued that a Christian can reconcile an ] view with a ] of ] in the Bible by accepting the ].<ref>], p. 55: "The young earth-solution to reconciling the order of creation with natural history makes good exegetical and theological sense. Indeed, the overwhelming consensus of theologians up through the Reformation held to this view. I myself would adopt it in a heartbeat except that nature seems to present such strong evidence against it."</ref> He further argued that ] likely was a phenomenon limited to the Middle East.<ref name="HowOld">{{cite news |last=Roach |first=David |date=October 20, 2010 |title=How Old? Age of Earth debated among SBC scholars |url=http://www.gofbw.com/news.asp?ID=12220&fp=Y |newspaper=Florida Baptist Witness |location=Jacksonville, FL |publisher=Florida Baptist State Convention |issn=1092-7409 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> This caused controversy and Dembski's reading of the Bible was criticized by Tom Nettles, a young Earth creationist, in '']'', Southern Seminary's official theological journal.<ref name="HowOld" /><ref>{{cite journal |last=Nettles |first=Tom J. |year=2009 |title=The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World |url=http://www.sbts.edu/resources/files/2010/02/sbjt_134_book_reviews.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.sbts.edu/resources/files/2010/02/sbjt_134_book_reviews.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |journal=] |type=Book review |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=80–85 |issn=1520-7307 |access-date=December 28, 2012}}</ref> In 2010, the dean of Southwestern's School of Theology, David Allen, "released a White Paper through the seminary's Center for Theological Research defending Dembski as within the bounds of orthodoxy and critiquing Nettles for misunderstanding the book. The paper included Dembski's statement admitting error regarding Noah's flood."<ref name="HowOld" /><ref>]</ref> Southwestern Seminary president ], a young Earth creationist, "said that when Dembski's questionable statements came to light, he convened a meeting with Dembski and several high-ranking administrators at the seminary. At that meeting, Dembski was quick to admit that he was wrong about the flood. "'Had I had any inkling that Dr. Dembski was actually denying the absolute trustworthiness of the Bible, then that would have, of course, ended his relationship with the school,' he said."<ref name="HowOld" />


==Public advocacy== ==Public advocacy==
{{Intelligent Design}} {{Intelligent Design}}


In December 2001, Dembski launched the ] (ISCID), of which he is Executive Director. Dembski is also the editor-in-chief of ISCID's journal, ''Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design'' (PCID), which appears to have ceased publication with its November 2005 issue.<ref></ref> He has several more books in preparation as well as producing a string of Flash animations mocking his detractors. He is also a member of ], the ], and the ], and is a senior fellow of the ]. In December 2001, Dembski launched the ] (ISCID), of which he is Executive Director. Dembski is also the editor-in-chief of ISCID's journal, ''Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design'' (PCID), which appears to have ceased publication with its November 2005 issue.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Branch |first=Glenn |author-link=Glenn Branch |date=November–December 2010 |title=The Latest 'Intelligent Design' Journal |url=http://ncse.com/book/export/html/6703 |journal=Reports of the National Center for Science Education |volume=30 |issue=6 |pages=10–13 |issn=2158-818X |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> He has several more books in preparation as well as producing an ] animation mocking Judge ], who presided in the landmark 2005 '']'' case.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.overwhelmingevidence.com/id/JJ_school_of_law/jones.swf |title=Judge Jones and the ACLU |website=Overwhelming Evidence |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |format=Small Web Format (SWF) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140110091155/http://www.overwhelmingevidence.com/id/JJ_school_of_law/jones.swf |archive-date=January 10, 2014 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> He is also a member of ], the ], and the ], and is a senior fellow of the ].


Dembski frequently gives public talks, principally to religious, pro-ID groups, and ]. ] and ] noted that Dembski has not been hesitant in associating with ], such as attending conferences with ].<ref>{{cite book |author=]; ] |title=] |publisher=] |location=Oxford |year=2004 |pages= |isbn=0-19-515742-7 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref> His lectures have been met with criticism by scientists for being half-hearted, lackluster, containing numerous errors and distortions, lacking positive evidence for intelligent design, and for evading questions.<ref name="NCSE-DembskiLecture">{{cite news | url=http://ncse.com/rncse/27/5-6/victory-over-intelligent-design-oklahoma | title=A Victory over "Intelligent Design" in Oklahoma | publisher=] |year=2008 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-02-19}}</ref> Dembski frequently gives public talks, principally to religious, pro-ID groups, and creationists. ] and ] noted that Dembski has not been hesitant in associating with young Earth creationists, such as attending conferences with ].<ref>], </ref>


Dembski, along with fellow Discovery Institute associates ] and ], "tutored" ] on science and evolution for her book ]. Approximately one-third of the book is devoted to ] attacks on ], which Coulter, as Dembski often does, terms "]".<ref> Dembski. Uncommondescent.com, June 12, 2006</ref> Dembski, along with fellow Discovery Institute associates Michael Behe and ], tutored ] on science and evolution for her book '']'' (2006).<ref>], p. 319: "I couldn't have written about evolution without the generous tutoring of Michael Behe, David Berlinski, and William Dembski, all of whom are fabulous at translating complex ideas, unlike liberal arts types, who constantly force me to the dictionary to relearn the meaning of ''quotidian''."</ref> Approximately one-third of the book is devoted to ]al attacks on evolution, which Coulter, as Dembski often does, terms "]."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/ann-coulter-the-wedge-for-the-masses/ |title=Ann Coulter: The Wedge for the Masses |last=Dembski |first=William |date=June 12, 2006 |website=Uncommon Descent |publisher=Uncommon Descent, Inc. |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


Dembski participated in the film ''],'' released in 2008. Dembski told the ''Southern Baptist Texan'' that those who need to see the movie are the "parents of children in high school or college, as well as those children themselves, who may think that the biological sciences are a dispassionate search for truth about life but many of whose practitioners see biology, especially evolutionary biology, as an ideological weapon to destroy faith in God."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.texanonline.net/default.asp?action=article&aid=5527&issue=1/28/2008 | title=Baptist professors featured in new film | publisher=] |date= January 28, 2008 | first= | last= | accessdate =2008-02-17}}</ref> Dembski has appeared on several television shows, including a 2005 interview with ] on ] with ] and ] where he said he accepted religion before science.<ref name="DailyShow">{{cite news | url=http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=124491&title=Evolution,-Schmevolution---Panel:-Edward-J.-Larson,-William-A.-Dembski,-Ellie-Crystal | title=Evolution, Schmevolution - Panel | publisher=] |date=September 14, 2005 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-02-19}}</ref> Dembski participated in the documentary film ''],'' released in 2008. Dembski told the ''Southern Baptist Texan'' that those who need to see the movie are the "parents of children in high school or college, as well as those children themselves, who may think that the biological sciences are a dispassionate search for truth about life but many of whose practitioners see biology, especially evolutionary biology, as an ideological weapon to destroy faith in God."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Pierce |first=Jerry |title=Baptist professors featured in new film |url=http://robertmarks.org/InTheNews/2007_Media/080128_BaptistProfessorsFeatured.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://robertmarks.org/InTheNews/2007_Media/080128_BaptistProfessorsFeatured.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |date=January 28, 2008 |journal=Southern Baptist Texan |oclc=46698671 |access-date=2014-01-10}}</ref> Dembski has appeared on several television shows, including a 2005 interview with ] on '']'' with ] and Ellie Crystal where he said he accepted religion before science.<ref name="DailyShow">{{cite episode |title=Evolution, Schmevolution - Panel: Edward J. Larson, William A. Dembski, Ellie Crystal |url=http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-14-2005/evolution--schmevolution---panel--edward-j--larson--william-a--dembski--ellie-crystal |access-date=2014-01-10 |series=] |first=Jon (host) |last=Stewart |author-link=Jon Stewart |network=] |date=September 14, 2005}}</ref>


===Writing=== ===Writing===
Line 107: Line 111:
In 1998, Dembski published his first book, ''The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities'', which became a ] bestselling philosophical monograph. In 1998, Dembski published his first book, ''The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities'', which became a ] bestselling philosophical monograph.


In 2002, Dembski published his book ''No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence''. It was ''No Free Lunch'' that prompted Dembski's Discovery Institute colleague Robert C. Koons to deem Dembski the "Isaac Newton of information theory." Dembski's work, however, was strongly criticized within the scientific community, which argued that there were a number of major logical inconsistencies and evidential gaps in Dembski's hypothesis. ], co-creator of the ] on which Dembski based his book, characterised his arguments as "fatally informal and imprecise," "written in jello," reminiscent of philosophical discussion "in art, music, and literature, as well as much of ethics" rather than of scientific debate.<ref name=jello>, David H. Wolpert, Talk Reason</ref> In 2002, Dembski published his book ''No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence.'' Dembski's work was strongly criticized within the scientific community, which argued that there were a number of major logical inconsistencies and evidential gaps in Dembski's hypothesis. ], co-creator of the ] on which Dembski based his book, characterized his arguments as "fatally informal and imprecise," "written in jello," reminiscent of philosophical discussion "of art, music, and literature, as well as much of ethics" rather than of scientific debate.<ref name="jello">{{cite web |url=http://www.talkreason.org/articles/jello.cfm |title=William Dembski's Treatment of the No Free Lunch Theorems is Written in Jello |last=Wolpert |first=David H. |website=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


While fellow intelligent design proponents have praised Dembski's writing, mathematician and critic ] described his writing as being ovemphasising his self-importance.<ref>{{cite book |author=]; ] |title=] |publisher=] |location=Oxford |year=2004 |pages= |isbn=0-19-515742-7 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref> Mathematician ] has stated he believes Dembski overemphasizes his own self-importance in his writing.<ref>], </ref>


====Peer-review controversy==== ====Peer-review controversy====
One of the common objections to intelligent design being accepted as valid science is that ID proponents have published no scientific papers in the peer-reviewed scientific literature in support of their conjectures. The ruling in the 2005 Dover trial, '']'', found that intelligent design had not been tested by the process of being published in a peer-reviewed ] and was not supported by any peer-reviewed research, data or publications.<ref>]</ref><ref>, ]</ref> Despite the Dover trial ruling, the Discovery Institute lists Dembski's 1998 book ''The Design Inference'' under the heading "Peer-Reviewed Scientific Books Supportive of Intelligent Design Published by Trade Presses or University Presses".<ref>, ]</ref> The Discovery Institute describes Dembski as a mathematician and philosopher, who includes in his credentials postdoctoral work in physics and in computer science, and a B.A. in psychology.<ref></ref><ref></ref><!--reference doesn't mention peer review: he has no peer reviewed scientific publications and no recent mathematical publications.<ref></ref>--> One of the common objections to intelligent design being accepted as valid science is that ID proponents have published no scientific papers in the ] scientific literature in support of their conjectures. The ruling in the 2005 Dover trial, ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District'', found that intelligent design had not been tested by the process of being published in a peer-reviewed ] and was not supported by any peer-reviewed research, data or publications.<ref>'']'', ]</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/03_Areas/evolution/issues/peerreview.shtml |title=Intelligent Design and Peer Review |website=] |location=Washington, D.C. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070312080527/http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/03_Areas/evolution/issues/peerreview.shtml |archive-date=March 12, 2007 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Despite the Dover trial ruling, the Discovery Institute lists Dembski's 1998 book ''The Design Inference'' under the heading "Peer-Reviewed Scientific Books Supportive of Intelligent Design Published by Trade Presses or University Presses."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/2640 |title=Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated) |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=February 1, 2012 |website=] |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=December 28, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070804092839/http://www.discovery.org/a/2640 |archive-date=August 4, 2007 |df=mdy-all }} The July 1, 2007, version of page is .</ref> The Discovery Institute describes Dembski as a mathematician and philosopher, who includes in his credentials a ] in psychology and postdoctoral work in mathematics, physics and computer science.<ref name="Dembski_SF" /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/intelligent_design_might_be_me001691.html |title=Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker? Ignorance on Display in the New York Times |last=West |first=John G. |author-link=John G. West |date=December 4, 2005 |website=Evolution News & Views |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><!--reference doesn't mention peer review: he has no peer-reviewed scientific publications and no recent mathematical publications.<ref></ref>-->


] and ] ] states in an ] that despite common claims in the popular and religious press, Dembski is not a scientist by any reasonable standard, has not published any experimental or empirical tests of his claims, submitted his claims to the scrutiny of his peers or published in a scientific journal. In a footnote Shallit states that he does not consider mathematics to be science. Shallit describes Dembski's published mathematical output as "extremely small" for a research mathematician, and remarks that "it is very unlikely that his meagre output would merit tenure at any major university".<ref name="shallit_report"> in ]</ref> In an ], ] and ] ] states that despite common claims in the popular and religious press, Dembski is not a scientist by any reasonable standard, has not published any ] of his claims, submitted his claims to the scrutiny of his peers or been published in a scientific journal. In a footnote, Shallit states that he does not consider mathematics to be science. Shallit describes Dembski's published mathematical output as "extremely small" for a research mathematician and remarks that "it is very unlikely that his meagre output would merit tenure at any major university."<ref name="shallit_report">{{cite web |url=http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/expert_reports/2005-05-16_Shallit_expert_rebuttal_P.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/expert_reports/2005-05-16_Shallit_expert_rebuttal_P.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Expert Report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 |last=Shallit |first=Jeffrey |author-link=Jeffrey Shallit |date=May 16, 2005 |access-date=January 10, 2014}} Shallit's expert report in ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''.</ref>


Since Shallit's statement, as of May 2010, Dembski has published four peer reviewed papers in ] venues associated with the ] professional society. The papers deal with ''active information'' in the context of ] for solutions to problems. Quantified active information is introduced in "Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success."<ref name=ActiveInfo>William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II, "Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A, Systems and Humans, vol.39, #5, September 2009, pp.1051-1061 </ref> A second paper,"Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism,''<ref name=ActiveInfo2>Winston Ewert, William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II, "Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism," Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. San Antonio, TX, USA - October 2009, pp. 3047-3053. </ref> claims to deconstruct the evolution simulation ] by uncovering the sources of active information in the program. Since Shallit's statement, Dembski has (as of May 2010) published four peer-reviewed papers in ] venues associated with the ] professional society. The papers deal with ''active information'' in the context of ]es for solutions to problems. Quantified active information is introduced in "Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success."<ref>]</ref> A second paper, "Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism,"<ref>]</ref> claims to deconstruct the evolution simulation ] by uncovering the sources of active information in the program. A third paper<ref>]</ref> discusses the role of ]'s '']'' in the analysis of evolution. The most recent paper, "Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle,"<ref>]</ref> calculates the performance of various search algorithms which use the ] to search for a single string of a certain length in the set of all strings of this length.
A third paper <ref name=ActiveInfo3>William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II, "Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason and Conservation of Information in Computer Search,'' Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. San Antonio, TX, USA - October 2009, pp. 2647-2652. </ref> discusses the role of ]'s '']'' in the analysis of evolution. The most recent paper, "Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle,"
<ref> Winston Ewert, George Montañez, William A. Dembski, Robert J. Marks II, "Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle," Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, IEEE, University of Texas at Tyler, March 7–9, 2010, pp.290-297.</ref> calculates the performance of various search algorithms which use the ] to search for a single string of a certain length in the set of all strings of this length.


Dembski states that his 1998 book ''The Design Inference'' has also been peer reviewed. Dembski says: "This book was published by Cambridge University Press and peer-reviewed as part of a distinguished monograph series, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory".<ref>, William Dembski, October 10, 2003</ref> In his expert report, Shallit states, "I know that book manuscripts typically do not receive the same sort of scrutiny that research articles do. ...it is not uncommon for a 10-page paper to receive 5 pages or more of comments whereas a book manuscript of 200 pages often receives about the same number...".<ref name="shallit_report"/> Dembski states that his book ''The Design Inference'' has also been peer-reviewed: "This book was published by Cambridge University Press and peer-reviewed as part of a distinguished monograph series, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2003.10.Scott_Response.htm |title=Peer Review Response to Eugenie Scott and the NCSE |last=Dembski |first=William |date=October 10, 2003 |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> In his expert report, Shallit states, "I know that book manuscripts typically do not receive the same sort of scrutiny that research articles do. ...it is not uncommon for a 10-page paper to receive 5 pages or more of comments, whereas a book manuscript of two hundred pages often receives about the same number...."<ref name="shallit_report" /> In addition, Mark Isaak claims that Dembski's book was reviewed by philosophers and not biologists.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CI/CI001_4.html |title=Index to Creationist Claims: Claim CI001.4 |editor-last=Isaak |editor-first=Mark |website=] |publisher=The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. |location=Houston, TX |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


==='The Inner Life of the Cell' copyright controversy=== ===''The Inner Life of the Cell'' copyright controversy===
In November, 2007, a graduate student named S. A. Smith brought an apparent case of wholesale academic misuse of unlicenced content to public attention. She noticed that a video used by Dembski in his lecture was identical to '']'' animation created by ] and a company called XVIVO. The audio track giving a scientific explanation was stripped off and the video was used with an alternative narration. The matter was brought to the attention of Harvard and XVIVO. ], creator of the video, wrote that Dembski was warned about using the video without permission.<ref> by ] April 11, 2008</ref> Copies of the original video and the re-narrated one are available from ''The Panda's Thumb''<ref>, November 20, 2007</ref>, an evolutionary discussion group. In November 2007, a graduate student named S. A. Smith brought an apparent case of wholesale academic misuse of unlicensed content to public attention. She noticed that a video used by Dembski in his lecture was identical to '']'' animation created by ] and ]. The audio track giving a scientific explanation was stripped off and the video was used with an alternative narration. The matter was brought to the attention of Harvard and XVIVO. ], creator of the video, wrote that Dembski was warned about using the video without permission.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.richarddawkins.net/article,2460,Expelled-ripped-off-Harvards-Inner-Life-of-the-Cell-animation,David-Bolinsky |title='Expelled' ripped off Harvard's 'Inner Life of the Cell' animation |last=Bolinsky |first=David |author-link=David Bolinsky |date=April 10, 2008 |website=RichardDawkins.net |publisher=] |location=Arlington, VA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080413032341/http://www.richarddawkins.net/article,2460,Expelled-ripped-off-Harvards-Inner-Life-of-the-Cell-animation,David-Bolinsky |archive-date=April 13, 2008 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


In response to the allegations, Dembski has claimed that he downloaded the video from the Internet, and added a voiceover narration that he deemed appropriate for his audience. According to Dembski, the downloaded version omitted the opening credits but contained the closing credits, which were shown to the audience.<ref></ref> However, Smith later documented several instances where images from the Harvard/XVIVO animation were apparently removed from his book '']'' but the related footnotes and references were not.<ref name = Smith1>Smith, S.A. 2007. </ref><ref name = Smith2>Smith, S.A. 2007. </ref> indicating that Dembski was already aware that permission had been denied for him to use the animation when he delivered his presentation at the ].<ref name = Smith2/> In response to the allegations, Dembski has claimed that he downloaded the video from the Internet, and added a voiceover narration that he deemed appropriate for his audience. According to Dembski, the downloaded version omitted the opening credits but contained the closing credits, which were shown to the audience.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uncommondescent.com/molecular-animations/news-release-harvards-xvivo-video/ |title=News Release: Harvard's XVIVO Video |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=November 27, 2007 |website=Uncommon Descent |publisher=Uncommon Descent, Inc. |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> However, Smith later documented several instances where images from the Harvard/XVIVO animation were apparently removed from his book '']'' (2008) but the related footnotes and references were not.<ref name="Smith1">{{cite web |url=http://endogenousretrovirus.blogspot.com/2007/12/dembski-copyright-and-design-of-life.html |title=Dembski, Copyright, and 'Design of Life' |last=Smith |first=Abbie |date=December 17, 2007 |website=EVR |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Smith2">{{cite web |url=http://endogenousretrovirus.blogspot.com/2007/12/discovery-institute-dembski-copyright.html |title=Discovery Institute, Dembski, Copyright, and 'Design of Life' |last=Smith |first=Abbie |date=December 24, 2007 |website=EVR |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> indicating that Dembski was already aware that permission had been denied for him to use the animation when he delivered his presentation at the University of Oklahoma.<ref name="Smith2" />


On April 9, 2008 ], a movie Dembski appears in, was given a ] by XVIVO accusing the producers of ] concerning the same video.<ref>, April 9, 2008</ref> On April 9, 2008, ''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'', a movie Dembski appears in, was given a ] by XVIVO accusing Premise Media, the ''Expelled'' producers, of ] concerning the same video.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ncse.com/files/pub/creationism/EXPELLED-Letter.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://ncse.com/files/pub/creationism/EXPELLED-Letter.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Re: Copyright infringement in 'Expelled: No Intel ligence Allowed' |last=Bolinsky |first=David |date=April 9, 2008 |type=Letter to Logan Craft |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> A June 2008 Premise Media press release announced Premise Media and XVIVO, LLC, "reached an agreement" noting "XVIVO has agreed that the Premise Media documentary does not infringe on any of XVIVO's intellectual property rights."<ref>{{cite press release |last1=Erhardt |first1=Megan |last2=Hutchins |first2=Mary Beth |date=July 24, 2008 |title=EXPELLED/XVIVO Agreement: No Infringement |url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080724005792/en/EXPELLEDXVIVO-Agreement-Infringement |location=Dallas, TX |publisher=Premise Media |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Evolution=== ===Evolution===
{{Main|Evolution}}
Dembski's views on evolution have been a source of considerable controversy within both the mainstream scientific and creationist communities. Dembski does not accept ].<ref></ref> His mainstream scientific critics have accused him of dishonesty in his representation of scientific facts and writing,<ref>, Matt Inlay</ref><ref>, Jason Rosenhouse</ref> and he has also been criticised by the traditional ] community for not supporting the "]" creationist position,<ref>, ], ]</ref> though he is also defended on other grounds by the same creationist community.<ref>, Royal Truman, ]</ref><ref>, Royal Truman, ]</ref><ref>, ], October 28, 2000</ref>
Dembski's views on evolution have been a source of considerable controversy within both the mainstream scientific and creationist communities. Dembski does not accept ].<ref>{{cite interview |last=Dembski |first=William A |interviewer=Mario Lopez |title=An Interview with Dr. William A. Dembski (Updated) |url=http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1438 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> His mainstream scientific critics have accused him of dishonesty in his representation of scientific facts and writing,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/02/bill-dembski-an.html |title=Bill Dembski and the case of the unsupported assertion |last=Inlay |first=Matt |date=February 16, 2005 |website=The Panda's Thumb |publisher=The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. |location=Houston, TX |type=Blog |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Rosenhouse |first=Jason |author-link=Jason Rosenhouse |date=November–December 2005 |title=Why Do Scientists Get So Angry When Dealing With ID Proponents? |url=http://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/why_do_scientists_get_so_angry/ |journal=] |volume=29 |issue=6 |issn=0194-6730 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> and he has also been criticised by the traditional creationist community for not supporting the young Earth creationist position,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://creation.com/id-theorist-blunders-on-bible-response-to-dembski |title=ID theorist blunders on Bible (response to Dembski) |last=Sarfati |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Sarfati |date=February 7, 2005 |website=Creation.com |publisher=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> though this community does defend some of his other arguments.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Truman |first=Royal |date=August 1999 |title=Divining design |url=http://creation.com/divining-design |journal=Journal of Creation |type=Book review |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=34–39 |issn=1036-2916 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Truman |first=Royal |date=April 2000 |title=Designer science |url=http://creation.com/designer-science |journal=Journal of Creation |type=Book review |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=28–34 |issn=1036-2916 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2000/10/28/baptist-school-afraid-of-creation |title=Baptist School Afraid of Creation |date=October 28, 2000 |website=] |publisher=Answers in Genesis of Kentucky, Inc |location=Hebron, KY |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


====Science vs. naturalism==== ====Science vs. naturalism====
Dembski objects to the presence of the theory of evolution in a variety of disciplines, presenting intelligent design as an alternative to reductionist materialism that gives a sense of purpose that the unguided evolutionary process lacks<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2005/02/24/cover_story/cover.txt | title = Evolution Revolution | work = Las Vegas City Life | date = 2005-02-24 | accessdate = 2010-08-09 | last = Pike | first = D }}</ref> and the ultimate significance of ID is its success in undermining materialism and ].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=19115 | title = Dembski to head seminary's new science & theology center | first = J | last = Robinson | work = ] | date = 2004-09-16 | accessdate = 2010-08-10 }}</ref> Dembski has also stated that ID has little chance as a serious scientific theory as long as methodological naturalism is the basis for science.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.origins.org/articles/dembski_theologn.html | title = What every theologian should know about creation, evolution and design | last = Dembski | first = WA | accessdate = 2010-08-09 | date = 2007-11-01 | publisher = Origins.org }}</ref> Although intelligent design proponents (including Dembski) have made little apparent effort to publish peer-reviewed scientific research to support their hypotheses, in recent years they have made vigorous efforts to promote the teaching of intelligent design in schools.<ref name="kitzmillerpg">]</ref> Dembski is a strong supporter of this drive as a means of making young people more receptive to intelligent design, and said he wants "to see intelligent design flourish as a scientific research program" among a "new generation of scholars" willing to consider the theory and textbooks that include it.<ref>{{cite book |author=]; ] |title=] |publisher=] |location=Oxford |year=2004 |pages= |isbn=0-19-515742-7 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>}} Dembski objects to the presence of the theory of evolution in a variety of disciplines, presenting intelligent design as an alternative to reductionist materialism that gives a sense of purpose that the unguided evolutionary process lacks<ref>{{cite news |last=Pike |first=Deidre |date=February 24, 2005 |title=Evolution Revolution |url=http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2005/02/24/cover_story/cover.txt |work=Las Vegas City Life |location=Las Vegas, NV |publisher=] |access-date=August 9, 2010}}</ref> and the ultimate significance of ID is its success in undermining materialism and ].<ref name="Robinson" /> Dembski has also stated that ID has little chance as a serious ] as long as ] is the basis for science.<ref>]</ref> Although intelligent design proponents (including Dembski) have made little apparent effort to publish peer-reviewed scientific research to support their hypotheses, in recent years they have made vigorous efforts to promote the teaching of intelligent design in schools.<ref name="kitzmillerpg">''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District'', ]</ref> Dembski is a strong supporter of this drive as a means of making young people more receptive to intelligent design, and said he wants "to see intelligent design flourish as a scientific research program" among a "new generation of scholars" willing to consider the theory and textbooks that include it.<ref>], </ref>


====Intelligent designer==== ====Intelligent designer====
{{See also|Intelligent designer}} {{See also|Intelligent designer}}
Dembski has so far failed to explain the origin of the intelligent designer that created the universe, something he argues as unnecessary since such an intelligent designer is likely outside the dimensions of space and time, or to have any of his pro-intelligent design articles published in the peer-reviewed mainstream scientific journals. While intelligent design proponents often claim that such failure to get articles published is due to an alleged pro-evolution bias or conspiracy, Dembski himself has said that he prefers to disseminate his ideas in non-peer-reviewed media: "I've just gotten kind of blase about submitting things to journals where you often wait two years to get things into print. And I find I can actually get the turnaround faster by writing a book and getting the ideas expressed there. My books sell well. I get a royalty. And the material gets read more." <ref>], December 21, 2001</ref> Dembski's theories do not attempt to explain the origin of the intelligent designer that created the universe, which he argues is unnecessary, since such an intelligent designer is likely outside the dimensions of space and time which are the subject of empirical science.
He has not had any of his pro-intelligent-design articles published in peer-reviewed mainstream scientific journals. While intelligent design proponents often allege that such failure to be published is due to a pro-evolution bias or conspiracy, Dembski himself has said he prefers to disseminate his ideas in non-peer-reviewed media: "I've just gotten kind of blasé about submitting things to journals where you often wait two years to get things into print. And I find I can actually get the turnaround faster by writing a book and getting the ideas expressed there. My books sell well. I get a royalty. And the material gets read more."<ref>{{cite news |last=McMurtrie |first=Beth |date=December 21, 2001 |title=Darwinism Under Attack |url=http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/darwinismunderattack012502.htm |newspaper=The Chronicle of Higher Education |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education Inc. |issn=0009-5982 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


In December 2007, Dembski told ] that "The Designer of intelligent In December 2007, Dembski told ] that "The Designer of intelligent
design is, ultimately, the Christian God."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000006139.cfm | title=Friday Five: William A. Dembski | publisher=] |date= December 14, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate =2008-05-17}}</ref> design is, ultimately, the Christian God."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000006139.cfm |title=Friday Five: William A. Dembski |last=Williams |first=Devon |date=December 14, 2007 |website=CitizenLink.com |publisher=] |location=Colorado Springs, CO |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217212817/http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000006139.cfm |archive-date=December 17, 2007 |access-date=May 17, 2008}}</ref>


==== Specified complexity ==== ==== Specified complexity ====
{{Main|Specified complexity}} {{Main|Specified complexity}}
Specified complexity is an argument proposed by Dembski and used by him in his works promoting ]. According to Dembski, the concept is intended to formalize a property that singles out patterns that are both specified and complex. Dembski states that specified complexity is a reliable marker of design by an intelligent agent, a central tenet to intelligent design and which Dembski argues for in opposition to modern ]. The concept of specified complexity is widely regarded as mathematically unsound and has not been the basis for further independent work in ], ], or ].<ref>Rich Baldwin, (2005). ''''</ref><ref>Mark Perakh, (2005). ''''</ref><ref>Jason Rosenhouse, (2001). '''' The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 23, No. 4, Fall 2001, pp. 3-8.</ref> Specified complexity is one of the two main arguments used by intelligent design proponents, the other being ]. Concerning his work in these two areas, Robert Koons, a Fellow along with Dembski at the Discovery Institute and Dembski's ], and ] philosopher <ref></ref> dubs Dembski as "the Isaac Newton of information theory." Specified complexity is a concept which Dembski has proposed and used in his works promoting intelligent design, an argument intended to give a formal definition of patterns that are both specified and complex. He claims it is a reliable marker of design by an intelligent agent, a central concept of intelligent design, as opposed to natural selection in modern evolutionary theory. The concept of specified complexity is widely regarded as mathematically unsound and has not been the basis for further independent work in information theory, ], or biology.<ref>{{cite web |last=Baldwin |first=Rich |url=http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/information/dembski.html |title=Information Theory and Creationism: William Dembski |date=July 14, 2005 |website=TalkOrigins Archive |publisher=The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. |location=Houston, TX |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkreason.org/articles/newmath.cfm |title=Dembski 'displaces Darwinism' mathematically or does he? |last=Perakh |first=Mark |author-link=Mark Perakh |date=March 18, 2005 |website=Talk Reason |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Rosenhouse |first=Jason |date=Fall 2001 |title=How Anti-Evolutionists Abuse Mathematics |url=http://educ.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/sewell.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://educ.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/sewell.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |journal=] |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=3–8 |oclc=3526661 |access-date=January 10, 2014|doi=10.1007/bf03024593|s2cid=189888286 }}</ref> Specified complexity is one of the two main arguments used by intelligent design proponents, the other being irreducible complexity.


===Intelligent design and Christianity=== ===Intelligent design and Christianity===
Dembski's position on intelligent design's relationship with Christianity has been inconsistent. He has suggested that the "intelligent designer" was not necessarily synonymous with God: "It could be space aliens. There are many possibilities"<ref>], March 17, 2002</ref> but has on several occasions been explicit in labelling the designer the Christian God and linking ID with a Christian revival through which Christianity can be restored to its formerly pre-eminent place in society, supplanting "materialist" science. In his book ''Intelligent Design; the Bridge Between Science and Theology'' he states "The conceptual soundings of the theory can in the end only be located in Christ".<ref>''Intelligent Design; the Bridge Between Science and Theology'', p. 210, William Dembski</ref> On the pro-intelligent design designinference.com website Dembski said that intelligent design enables ] to be replaced with Christianity.<ref>, William Dembski, Designinference.com website, February 2005</ref> Dembski's position on intelligent design's relationship with Christianity has been inconsistent. He has suggested that the "intelligent designer" is not necessarily synonymous with a god: "It could be space aliens. There are many possibilities,"<ref>{{cite news |last=Hall |first=Carl T. |date=March 17, 2002 |title=Nature's diversity beyond evolution / Debate over 'intelligent design' |url=http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Nature-s-diversity-beyond-evolution-Debate-over-2862950.php |newspaper=] |publisher=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> but has on several occasions been explicit in labelling the designer as the Christian god and linking ID with a religious revival through which Christianity can be restored to its formerly pre-eminent place in society, supplanting "materialist" science. In his book ''Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology'' he states "The conceptual soundings of the theory can in the end only be located in Christ."<ref>], p. 210</ref> On his website, DesignInference.com, Dembski said that intelligent design provides an intellectual basis to restore ] over ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.02.Reply_to_Henry_Morris.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050217085428/http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.02.Reply_to_Henry_Morris.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 17, 2005 |title=Intelligent Design's Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris |last=Dembski |first=William |date=February 1, 2005 |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014 }}</ref>


Dembski has also spoken of his motivation for supporting intelligent design in a series of Sunday lectures in the Fellowship Baptist Church in Waco, Texas, the last of which took place on Sunday, March 7, 2004. Answering a question, Dembski said it was to enable God to receive credit for creation.<ref>, Mark Perakh, TalkReason.org 2004</ref> Dembski has also spoken of his motivation for supporting intelligent design in a series of Sunday lectures in the Fellowship Baptist Church in Waco, Texas, the last of which took place on March 7, 2004. Answering a question, Dembski said it was to enable God to receive credit for creation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkreason.org/articles/revolution.cfm |title=The design revolution? |last=Perakh |first=Mark |date=March 21, 2004 |website=Talk Reason |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Intelligent design movement=== ===Intelligent design movement===
Dembski sees intelligent design as being a popular movement as well as a scientific hypothesis and claims that it is in the process of dislodging evolution from the public imagination. At the Fourth World Skeptics Conference, held on June 20&ndash;June 23, 2002 in ], he told the audience that "over the next twenty-five years ID will provide the greatest challenge to skepticism". He asserted that "ID is threatening to be mainstream", and that polls show 90 percent support for the hypothesis, indicating that it has "already becom mainstream within the public themselves". "The usual skeptical retorts are not going to work against ID" and ID "turns the tables on skepticism". Evolution, in his view, "is the ultimate status quo" and "squelches dissent". Young people, who "love rebellion" see that and are attracted to ID as a result. "The public supports intelligent design. The public is tired of being bullied by an intellectual elite". He contends that skeptics resort to rhetoric and "artificially define ID out of science," allowing in only material matters. ID "paints the more appealing world picture", whereas skepticism works by being negative, which "doesn't set well with the public... To most people evolution doesn't provide a compelling view".<ref>], September 1, 2002</ref> Dembski sees intelligent design as being a popular movement as well as a scientific hypothesis and claims that it is in the process of dislodging evolution from the public imagination. At the ]'s 4th World Skeptics Conference, held on June 20–23, 2002, in ], he told the audience that "over the next twenty-five years ID will provide the greatest challenge to skepticism." He asserted that "ID is threatening to be mainstream," and that polls show 90 percent support for the hypothesis, indicating that it has "already becom mainstream within the public themselves." "The usual skeptical retorts are not going to work against ID" and ID "turns the tables on skepticism." Evolution, in his view, "is the ultimate status quo" and "squelches dissent." Young people, who "love rebellion" see that and are attracted to ID as a result. "The public supports intelligent design. The public is tired of being bullied by an intellectual elite." He contends that skeptics resort to rhetoric and "artificially define ID out of science," admitting only materialistic explanations as legitimate. ID "paints the more appealing world picture," whereas skepticism works by being negative, which "doesn't set well with the public... To most people evolution doesn't provide a compelling view."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Frazier |first1=Kendrick |author-link1=Kendrick Frazier |last2=Radford |first2=Ben |author-link2=Benjamin Radford |date=September–October 2002 |title=Fourth World Skeptics Conference in Burbank a Lively Foment of Ideas |url=http://www.csicop.org/si/show/fourth_world_skeptics_conference_in_burbank_a_lively_foment_of_ideas/ |journal=Skeptical Inquirer |volume=26 |issue=5 |issn=0194-6730 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Bible code=== ===Bible code===
Dembski has also indicated an interest in the ]. In a favorable book review of Jeffrey Satinover's ''Cracking the Bible Code'', Dembski wrote that "The philosopher ] was once asked why he didn’t believe in God. He replied, "Not enough evidence." Satinover’s fascination with the Bible Code is that it may provide evidence for God’s existence that would have convinced even a Bertrand Russell." Dembski has also indicated an interest in the ]. In a favorable book review of ]'s ''Cracking the Bible Code'' (1997), Dembski wrote that "The philosopher ] was once asked why he didn't believe in God. He replied, 'Not enough evidence.' Satinover's fascination with the Bible Code is that it may provide evidence for God's existence that would have convinced even a Bertrand Russell."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=August–September 1998 |title=The Bible by Numbers |url=http://www.firstthings.com/article/2009/02/004-the-bible-by-numbers-44 |journal=] |type=Book review |issue=85 |pages=61–64 |issn=1047-5141 |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>


===Faith healing=== ===Faith healing===
Dembski once took his family to a meeting conducted by ], a ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/FaithMatters/story?id=5338963&page=1 |title=Thousands Flock to Revival in Search of Miracles |publisher=]|author=|date=2008-06-09|accessdate=2008-06-09}}</ref> in hopes of receiving a "miraculous healing" for his son, who is ].<ref name="faithhealing">{{cite news | url=http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=28460 | title=FIRST-PERSON: Faith & healing -- Where's the evidence? | publisher=] |date= July 11, 2008 | first=William | last=Dembski | accessdate =2008-05-17}}</ref> In an article for the ''Baptist Press'' he recalled disappointment with the nature of the meeting and with the prevention of his son and other attendees from joining those in wheelchairs who were selected to receive prayer. He then concluded, "Minimal time was given to healing, though plenty was devoted to assaulting our senses with blaring insipid music and even to Bentley promoting and selling his own products (books and CDs)." He wrote that he did not regret the trip and called it an "education," which showed "how easily religion can be abused, in this case to exploit our family."<ref name="faithhealing"/> Dembski once took his family to a meeting conducted by ], a ], in hopes of receiving a "miraculous healing" for his son, who is autistic.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kofman |first1=Jeffrey |author-link1=Jeffrey Kofman |last2=Yiu |first2=Karson |last3=Brennan |first3=Nicholas |date=July 9, 2008 |title=Thousands Flock to Revival in Search of Miracles |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/FaithMatters/story?id=5338963&page=1 |work=] |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref><ref name="faithhealing">{{cite news |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=July 11, 2008 |title=FIRST-PERSON: Faith & healing Where's the evidence? |url=http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=28460 |work=Baptist Press |location=Nashville, TN |publisher=Southern Baptist Convention |access-date=May 17, 2008}}</ref> In an article for the ''Baptist Press'' he recalled disappointment with the nature of the meeting and with the prevention of his son and other attendees from joining those in wheelchairs who were selected to receive prayer. He then concluded, "Minimal time was given to healing, though plenty was devoted to assaulting our senses with blaring insipid music and even to Bentley promoting and selling his own products (books and CDs)." He wrote that he did not regret the trip and called it an "education," which showed "how easily religion can be abused, in this case to exploit our family."<ref name="faithhealing" />


==Responses to critics == ==Responses to critics==
Dembski previews material on the Internet for ]. This helps identify errors and address objections prior to publication, allowing him to get "the last word in the exchange."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2004.04.Backlash.htm |title=Dealing with the Backlash |last=Dembski |first=William A. |date=April 14, 2004 |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-date=February 27, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110227021047/http://www.designinference.com/documents/2004.04.Backlash.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> Dembski's style in response to his critics (particularly of his mathematical papers) is polemical.<ref name="Dembski_Richards2001" /> For instance, in reply to a critique of the "law of conservation of information" posted on talkreason.org,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkreason.org/articles/dembski_LCI.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.talkreason.org/articles/dembski_LCI.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=On Dembski's Law of Conservation of Information |last=Tellgren |first=Erik |date=July 6, 2002 |website=Talk Reason |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref> Dembski states: "I'm not and never have been in the business of offering a strict mathematical proof for the inability of material mechanisms to generate specified complexity in the same way that no physicist is in the business of offering a strict mathematical proof for the conservation of energy."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.08.Erik_Response.htm |title=If Only Darwinists Scrutinized Their Own Work as Closely: A Response to 'Erik' |last=Dembski |first=William A. |website=DesignInference.com |publisher=William Dembski |location=Pella, IA |access-date=January 10, 2014}}</ref>
Dembski previews material on the Internet in order to gain advance notice of objections and address them prior to pubication, allowing him to get "the last word in the exchange".<ref>, William Dembski</ref>


== Publications ==
Dembski's style in response to his critics (particularly of his mathematical papers) is polemical.<ref>, William Dembski, ]</ref> For instance, in reply to a critique of the "law of conservation of information" posted on talkreason.org,<ref>, TalkReason</ref> Dembski states: "I'm not and never have been in the business of offering a strict mathematical proof for the inability of material mechanisms to generate specified complexity".<ref>, William Dembski</ref>


=== Books ===
Dembski has also shown a hostility for providing a mechanistic explanation for intelligent design theory,<ref>, William Dembski, September 18, 2002</ref> but Dembski's critics maintain that he has yet to provide a means of determining if ID is correct.
{{Refbegin|2}}

In late 2006 Dembski created and published a ] animation, ''The Judge Jones School of Law'' at his intelligent design website, OverwhelmingEvidence.com.<ref></ref><ref name = bwa_ha_ha>, ], ]</ref> In it he originally depicted ], the presiding judge in ], as a flatulent mouthpiece of the ACLU. In an email Dembski, after it was published that he provided the voiceover, offered to let Judge Jones provide his own voice for the animation and to reduce the frequency of flatulence in the animation if Jones agreed to participate.<ref name = bwa_ha_ha/> This prompted critics, among them ], to question Dembski's motive and the scholarliness of such tactics.<ref name = bwa_ha_ha/><ref></ref><ref>, ]</ref>

On having lent expertise to ] for her ] '']'' on the topics of evolution and intelligent design, Dembski said "I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters."<ref>, William Dembski</ref> Subsequently, James Downard in reviewing and criticizing the representation of science in ''Godless'' criticized Coulter's favoring of ]s over ]s, saying "she compulsively reads inaccurate antievolutionary sources and accepts them on account of their reinforcement of what she wants to be true."<ref>, James Downard, TalkReason</ref><ref>, James Downard, TalkReason</ref> Downard approached Dembski to account for what Downard called "Coulter’s remarkable unfamiliarity with the range of the ID controversy and apparent unawareness of the biogeographical underpinning of speciation, as well as a consistent inattention to any of the available fossil information." Dembski's response was not to take responsibility for the apparent errors made by Coulter but to publish both of Downard's e-mails to his blog, characterizing them as "sheer smarminess" and "entertainment."<ref>, William Dembski</ref><ref>, William Dembski</ref>

==Uncommon Descent ==

In April 2005, Dembski launched uncommondescent.com (UD), a ] for his pro-ID views and theories.<ref>http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main/uncommondescent.com</ref> He shut it down six days after the conclusion of the ] trial in December, 2005.
It was re-launched in January, 2006 as a group blog still committed to the advancement of ID.<ref>, William Dembski</ref> On November 13, 2008 Dembski stepped down from the blog to focus on technical ID research.<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/</ref>

== Books by Dembski ==
'''Sole author''' '''Sole author'''
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1988 |title=Chaos, Uniform Probability, and Weak Convergence |type=Thesis (PhD) |location=Chicago, IL |publisher=], Department of Mathematics |lccn=94629367 |oclc=31515673 |ref=Dembski 1988}}
*William A. Dembski, '']''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. ISBN 0-521-62387-1
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1998 |title=The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities |location=Cambridge; New York |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-521-62387-2 |lccn=98003020 |oclc=38551103 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski 1998a|title-link=The Design Inference }}
*William A. Dembski, '']''. Downer's Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1999. ISBN 0-8308-2314-X
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1999 |title=Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8308-1581-4 |lccn=99037141 |oclc=41628252 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski 1999|title-link=Intelligent Design (book) }}
*William A. Dembski, ''No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence''. (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.) ISBN 0-7425-5810-X
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=2002 |title=No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qCDp8MjkkLQC&q=no+free+lunch |location=Lanham, MD |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7425-1297-9 |lccn=2001031791 |oclc=46858256 |author-mask=2 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Dembski 2002}}
*William A. Dembski, '']''. Downer's Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8308-2375-1
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=2004 |title=The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design |others=Foreword by ] |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-3216-3 |lccn=2003020589 |oclc=53058980 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski 2004|title-link=The Design Revolution }}
*William A. Dembski, ''The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World''. Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Publishing, 2009. ISBN 978-0-8054-2743-1
*{{cite book |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=2009 |title=The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World |location=Nashville, TN |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8054-2743-1 |lccn=2010280674 |oclc=311762223 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski 2009}}


'''Co-author''' '''Co-author'''
*{{cite book |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=Wells |first2=Jonathan |author-link2=Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate) |year=2008 |title=How to be an Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (or not) |edition=1st |location=Wilmington, DE |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-933-85984-2 |lccn=2008934995 |oclc=232128215 |ref=Dembski & Wells 2008a}}
*William A. Dembski, ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ''Are We Spiritual Machines?: Ray Kurzweil vs. the Critics of Strong A.I.'' (Discovery Institute, June 6, 2001) ISBN 0-9638654-3-9
*William A. Dembski, ], ], and ]. '']''. Dallas: Foundation for Thought and Ethics, November 19, 2007 ISBN 0-9800213-0-8 (401 pages) *{{cite book |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=Wells |first2=Jonathan |year=2008 |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |title=The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence in Biological Systems |location=Dallas |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-9800213-0-1 |lccn=2009281462 |oclc=183624199 |author1-mask=2 |author2-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & Wells 2008b|title-link=Of Pandas and People#The Design of Life }}
*{{cite book |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=McDowell |first2=Sean |year=2008 |title=Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language |location=Eugene, OR |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7369-2442-9 |lccn=2008014216 |oclc=222249640 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & McDowell 2008}}
*William A. Dembski and ]. ''Moral Darwinism: How We Became Hedonists'' (InterVarsity Press, July 2002) ISBN 0-8308-2666-1
*{{cite book |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=Witt |first2=Jonathan |year=2010 |title=Intelligent Design Uncensored: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to the Controversy |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8308-3742-7 |lccn=2010000917 |oclc=460060932 |author-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & Witt 2010}}
*William A. Dembski and James M. Kushiner, ''Signs of Intelligence: Understanding Intelligent Design''. Brazos Press (March 1, 2001) ISBN 1-58743-004-5
*William A. Dembski and ]. ''Unapologetic Apologetics: Meeting the Challenges of Theological Studies''. Downer's Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2001. ISBN 0-8308-1563-5
*William A. Dembski and Sean McDowell, ''Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language''. (], July 1, 2008) ISBN 0-7369-2442-6
*William A. Dembski and ]. ''How to be an Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (Or Not)''. (], October 28, 2008) ISBN 1-933859-84-9
*William A. Dembski and Jonathan Witt, ''Intelligent Design Uncensored''. (IVP Books, May 2010) ISBN 0-8308-3742-7


'''As editor or contributor''' '''As editor or contributor'''
*{{cite book |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |year=1998 |title=Mere Creation: Science, Faith & Intelligent Design |others=Foreword by ] |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-1515-9 |lccn=98020999 |oclc=38959771 |ref=Dembski 1998b|title-link=List of works on intelligent design#Supportive non-fiction anthologies }}
*William A. Dembski and Michael Ruse (eds), '']''. ISBN 0-521-82949-6
*{{cite book |last1=Amos |first1=Gary |last2=Gardiner |first2=Richard |year=1998 |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |title=Never Before in History: America's Inspired Birth |series=Pandas Publications |others=Foreword by ] |location=Dallas, TX |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-914513-51-3 |lccn=98072936 |oclc=41105490 |ref=Amos & Gardiner 1998}}
*William A. Dembski (ed). ''Mere Creation''. (Downer's Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1998.) ISBN 0-8308-1515-5
*{{cite book |last1=Cole |first1=Deborah D. |last2=Duran |first2=Maureen Gallagher |year=1998 |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |title=Sex and Character |series=Pandas Publications |others=Foreword by Joe S. McIlhaney, Jr., MD |location=Dallas, TX |publisher=Haughton Publishing Company |isbn=978-0-914513-50-6 |lccn=98072932 |oclc=41068752 |ref=Cole & Duran 1998}}
*William A. Dembski and Bruce Gordon. ''The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science'' (Wilmington, Del.: ], 2009).
*William A. Dembski, ] and ], ''Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe'', Proceedings of the ], vol. 9 San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2000. ISBN 0-89870-809-5 *{{cite book |last1=Behe |first1=Michael J. |author-link1=Michael Behe |last2=Dembski |first2=William A. |last3=Meyer |first3=Stephen C. |author-link3=Stephen C. Meyer |year=2000 |title=Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe: Papers Presented at a Conference Sponsored by the Wethersfield Institute, New York City, September 25, 1999 |series= Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute |volume=9 |location=San Francisco, CA |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-89870-809-7 |lccn=00102374 |oclc=45720008 |ref=Behe, Dembski & Meyer 2000|title-link=List of works on intelligent design#Supportive non-fiction books }}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Kushiner |editor2-first=James M. |year=2001 |title=Signs of Intelligence: Understanding Intelligent Design |location=Grand Rapids, MI |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-58743-004-6 |lccn=00067612 |oclc=45499842 |ref=Dembski & Kushiner 2001|title-link=List of works on intelligent design#Supportive non-fiction books }}
*] (Foreword by William Dembski), ''What Darwin Didn't Know: A Doctor Dissects the Theory of Evolution''.(Harvest Publishers, January 1, 2004) ISBN 0-7369-1313-0
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Richards |editor2-first=Jay Wesley |year=2001 |title=Unapologetic Apologetics: Meeting the Challenges of Theological Studies |others=Foreword by ] |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-1563-0 |lccn=00047173 |oclc=45136696 |editor1-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & Richards 2001}}
*William A. Dembski, Wayne J. Downs, Fr. Justin B.A. Frederick, ''The Patristic Understanding of Creation: An Anthology of Writings from the Church Fathers on Creation and Design''. (Erasmus Press, June 11, 2008) ISBN 0-9815204-0-5
*{{cite book |editor-last=Richards |editor-first=Jay W. |editor-link=Jay Richards |year=2002 |title=Are We Spiritual Machines?: Ray Kurzweil vs. the Critics of Strong A.I. |others=Contributions by ], ], ], William Dembski, ], and ] |edition=1st |location=Seattle, WA |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-9638654-3-4 |lccn=2002101330 |oclc=59273082 |ref=Richards 2002}}
*{{cite book |last=Wiker |first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Wiker |year=2002 |title=Moral Darwinism: How We Became Hedonists |others=Foreword by William A. Dembski |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-2666-7 |lccn=2002004052 |oclc=49383607 |ref=Wiker 2002}}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Ruse |editor2-first=Michael |editor2-link=Michael Ruse |year=2004 |title=Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA |location=New York |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-82949-6 |lccn=2004047363 |oclc=54826160 |ref=Dembski & Ruse 2004|title-link=List of works on intelligent design#Neutral non-fiction anthologies }} "Papers from a conference, entitled Design and its Critics, held at Concordia University, Mequon, Wis., June 22–24, 2000."
*{{cite book |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |year=2004 |title=Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing |others=Foreword by John Wilson |location=Wilmington, DE |publisher=ISI Books |isbn=978-1-9322-3631-6 |lccn=2004102726 |oclc=55653649 |ref=Demski 2004|title-link=Uncommon Dissent }}
*{{cite book |last=Simmons |first=Geoffrey |author-link=Geoffrey Simmons |year=2004 |title=What Darwin Didn't Know: A Doctor Dissects the Theory of Evolution |others=Foreword by William Dembski |location=Eugene, OR |publisher=Harvest House Publishers |isbn=978-0-7369-1313-3 |lccn=2003015099 |oclc=52621437 |ref=Simmons 2004}}
*{{cite book |year=2006 |editor-last=Dembski |editor-first=William A. |title=Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement |others=Foreword by ] |location=Downers Grove, IL |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8308-2836-4 |lccn=2005033144 |oclc=62330745 |ref=Dembski 2006}}
*{{cite book |last=Flannery |first=Michael A. |year=2008 |title=Alfred Russel Wallace's Theory of Intelligent Evolution: How Wallace's World of Life Challenged Darwinism: With an Abridged Version of The World of Life |others=Edited, with an introduction by Michael A. Flannery; foreword by William A. Dembski |location=Riesel, TX |publisher=Erasmus Press |isbn=978-0-9815204-1-4 |lccn=2009921870 |oclc=340792516 |ref=Flannery 2008}}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Downs |editor2-first=Wayne J. |editor3-last=Frederick |editor3-first=Justin B. A. |year=2008 |title=The Patristic Understanding of Creation: An Anthology of Writings from the Church Fathers on Creation and Design |location=Riesel, TX |publisher=Erasmus Press |isbn=978-0-981-52040-7 |lccn=2008930284 |oclc=233055054 |ref=Dembski, Downs & Frederick 2008}}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Schirrmacher |editor2-first=Thomas |editor2-link=Thomas Schirrmacher |year=2008 |title=Tough-minded Christianity: Honoring the Legacy of John Warwick Montgomery |others=Foreword by ] |location=Nashville, TN |publisher=B&H Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-8054-4783-5 |lccn=2009282507 |oclc=233935324 |editor1-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & Schirrmacher 2008}}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Dembski |editor1-first=William A. |editor2-last=Licona |editor2-first=Michael R. |editor2-link=Michael R. Licona |year=2010 |title=Evidence for God: 50 Arguments for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science |location=Grand Rapids, MI |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8010-7260-4 |lccn=2010005990 |editor1-mask=2 |ref=Dembski & Licona 2010}}
*{{cite book |editor1-last=Gordon |editor1-first=Bruce L. |editor1-link=Bruce L. Gordon |editor2-last=Dembski |editor2-first=William A. |year=2011 |title=The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science |location=Wilmington, DE |publisher=ISI Books|isbn=978-1-935-19128-5 |lccn=2010031418 |oclc=326569291 |ref=Gordon & Dembski 2011}}
{{Refend}}

==Notes==
{{Reflist|30em}}


==References== ==References==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* {{cite book |last=Allen |first=David L. |date=February 2010 |title=A Reply to Tom Nettles' Review of William A. Dembski's The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World |url=http://www.baptisttheology.org/baptisttheology/assets/File/AReplytoTomNettlesReviewofDembskisTheEndofChristianity.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.baptisttheology.org/baptisttheology/assets/File/AReplytoTomNettlesReviewofDembskisTheEndofChristianity.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |type=White paper |others=Preamble by Paige Patterson |location=Fort Worth, TX |publisher=The Center for Theological Research; Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary |oclc=525171820 |ref=Allen 2010}}
<references/>
*{{cite book |last=Coulter |first=Ann H. |author-link=Ann Coulter |year=2007 |orig-year=Originally published 2006; New York: ] |title=Godless: The Church of Liberalism |edition=1st pbk. |location=New York |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4000-5421-3 |lccn=2007280683 |oclc=148652646 |ref=Coulter 2007|title-link=Godless: The Church of Liberalism }}
</div>
*{{cite journal |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1991 |title=Randomness by Design |url=http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.09.rndmnsbydes.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.09.rndmnsbydes.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |journal=] |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=75–106 |issn=0029-4624 |access-date=August 11, 2010 |ref=Dembski 1991 |doi=10.2307/2216094|jstor=2216094 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Dembski |first=William A. |year=1995 |title=What Every Theologian Should Know about Creation, Evolution and Design |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/122 |journal=] |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=15–21 |issn=1945-4813 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Dembski 1995}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=Marks II |first2=Robert J. |author-link2=Robert J. Marks II |date=September 2009 |title=Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success |url=http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_ConservationOfInformationInSearch.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_ConservationOfInformationInSearch.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |journal=IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=1051–1061 |doi=10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2025027 |s2cid=14421612 |issn=1083-4427 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Dembski & Marks 2009a}}
* {{cite conference |url=http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_BernoullisPrinciple.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_BernoullisPrinciple.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason and Conservation of Information in Computer Search |last1=Dembski |first1=William A. |last2=Marks II |first2=Robert J. |date=October 11–14, 2009 |conference=Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics |publisher=IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society |location=San Antonio, TX |pages=2647–2652 |isbn=978-1-4244-2794-9 |issn=1062-922X |doi=10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346119 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Dembski & Marks 2009b}}
* {{cite journal | last1=Elsberry | first1=Wesley | last2=Shallit | first2=Jeffrey | title=Information theory, evolutionary computation, and Dembski's "complex specified information" | journal=Synthese | volume=178 | issue=2 | date=16 April 2009 | issn=0039-7857 | doi=10.1007/s11229-009-9542-8 | pages=237–270 | citeseerx=10.1.1.318.2863 | s2cid=1846063 }}
* {{cite conference |url=http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_EvolutionarySynthesis.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://evoinfo.org/papers/2009_EvolutionarySynthesis.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism |last1=Ewert |first1=Winston |last2=Dembski |first2=William A. |last3=Marks II |first3=Robert J. |date=October 11–14, 2009 |conference=Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics |publisher=IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society |location=San Antonio, TX |pages=3047–3053 |isbn=978-1-4244-2794-9 |issn=1062-922X |doi=10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5345941 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Ewert, Dembski & Marks 2009}}
* {{cite conference |url=http://marksmannet.com/RobertMarks/REPRINTS/2010-EfficientPerQueryInformationExtraction.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://marksmannet.com/RobertMarks/REPRINTS/2010-EfficientPerQueryInformationExtraction.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle |last1=Ewert |first1=Winston |last2=Montañez |first2=George |last3=Dembski |first3=William A. |last4=Marks II |first4=Robert J. |journal=Proceedings, Southeastern Symposium on System Theory |date=March 7–9, 2010 |conference=2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory |publisher=] |location=] |pages=290–297 |isbn=978-1-4244-5690-1 |issn=0094-2898 |doi=10.1109/SSST.2010.5442816 |access-date=January 10, 2014 |ref=Ewert, Montañez, Dembski & Marks 2010}}
* {{cite book |last=Forrest |first=Barbara |author-link=Barbara Forrest |year=2001 |chapter=The Wedge at Work: How Intelligent Design Creationism Is Wedging Its Way into the Cultural and Academic Mainstream |chapter-url=http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Wedge.cfm#I |title=Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives |editor-last=Pennock |editor-first=Robert T |editor-link=Robert T. Pennock |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-262-66124-9 |lccn=2001031276 |oclc=46729201 |ref=Forrest 2001}}
* {{cite book |last1=Forrest |first1=Barbara |last2=Gross |first2=Paul R. |author-link2=Paul R. Gross |year=2004 |title=Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design |location=Oxford; New York |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-515742-0 |oclc=50913078 |lccn=2002192677 |ref=Forrest & Gross 2004|title-link=Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design }}
* {{cite book |year=2004 |editor1-last=Young |editor1-first=Matt |editor2-last=Edis |editor2-first=Taner | editor-link2=Taner Edis | title=Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism |location=New Brunswick, NJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8135-3433-6 |lccn=2003020100 |oclc=59717533 |ref=Young & Edis 2004}}
{{Refend}}

== Further reading ==
{{cite book |editor-last=Stewart |editor-first=Robert B. |year=2007 |title=Intelligent Design: William A. Dembski & Michael Ruse in Dialogue |location=Minneapolis, MN |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-800-66218-9 |lccn=2007027505 |oclc=148895223 |ref=Stewart 2007}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{wikiquote}} {{Wikiquote}}
'''Official''' '''Official'''
* &mdash; Dembski's website (with articles) * Dembski's website (with articles)
* from ] * from the Discovery Institute
* – Dembski cofounded this blog
* – Dembski cofounded this lab with ]


'''Reviews/Analysis of Dembski''' '''Reviews/analysis of Dembski'''
* – a book review by ]
* by Peter Olofsson in Chance, 2008
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090225145109/http://philosophy.wisc.edu/sober/dembski.pdf |date=February 25, 2009 }} (PDF) – a book review by ], Christopher Stephens, and ] in '']'' (1999) '''66''': 472–488
* by Peter Olofsson in Biology and Philosophy, 2008
* (PDF) by Peter Olofsson in '']'' (2008) '''23''' (4): 545–553
* by ] in biosystems
* (PDF) by Peter Olofsson in ''Chance'' (2008) '''21''' (3): 42–45
* by ]
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031229033705/http://www.bostonreview.net/BR27.3/orr.html |date=December 29, 2003 |title="William A. Dembski: ''No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence''" }} – a book review by ] in '']'' (Summer 2002) '''27''' (3–4)
* , a harsh critique of ''No Free Lunch'' by David Wolpert, one of the co-originators of the ]
* by ] from the ] * by ]
* by Jeffrey Shallit posted at ''The Panda's Thumb'' blog, May 12, 2004
* from '']''
* (PDF) – a book review by ] in '']'' (June–July 2002) '''66''' (1–2): 93–99
* ], May, 2004
* – a book review by Lael Weinberger in '']'' (April 2009) '''23''' (1): 25–29
* ], 1999
* , Wilkins, John S, and Wesley R Elsberry, 2001, unedited version of a paper published in ''Biology and Philosophy'' 16 (November):711-724. * by John S. Wilkins and ]. An unedited version of a paper published in '']'' '''16''' (November 2001):711–724
* by Peter S. Williams at the ]

'''Biographical information'''
* {{MathGenealogy|id=61371}}: ''Chaos, Uniform Probability, and Weak Convergence'' (1988), PhD dissertation, University of Chicago

'''Other'''
* {{IMDb name|1745037}}

{{Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary}}
{{authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Dembski, William A.}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Dembski, William A.}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:05, 29 October 2024

American mathematician and proponent of intelligent design

William A. Dembski
photographDembski in 2006
Born (1960-07-18) July 18, 1960 (age 64)
Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
EducationUniversity of Illinois at Chicago (BA, MS, PhD)
University of Chicago (MS, PhD)
Princeton Theological Seminary (MDiv)
Known forIntelligent design
Specified complexity
Notable workThe Design Inference (1998)
WebsiteBillDembski.com

William Albert Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher and theologian. He was a proponent of intelligent design (ID) pseudoscience, specifically the concept of specified complexity, and was a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture (CSC). On September 23, 2016, he officially retired from intelligent design, resigning all his "formal associations with the ID community, including Discovery Institute fellowship of 20 years". A February 2021 interview in the CSC's blog Evolution News announced "his return to the intelligent design arena".

In 2012, he taught as the Phillip E. Johnson Research Professor of Science and Culture at the Southern Evangelical Seminary in Matthews, North Carolina, near Charlotte.

Dembski has written books about intelligent design, including The Design Inference (1998), Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology (1999), The Design Revolution (2004), The End of Christianity (2009), and Intelligent Design Uncensored (2010).

Intelligent design is the argument that an intelligent cause is responsible for the complexity of life and that one can detect that cause empirically. Dembski postulated that probability theory can be used to prove irreducible complexity (IC) and what he called "specified complexity." The scientific community sees intelligent design—and Dembski's concept of specified complexity—as a form of creationism attempting to portray itself as science.

Biography

Dembski was born in Chicago, Illinois, the only child of Catholic parents. His mother was an art dealer and his father was a college professor who held a D.Sc. in biology from the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and taught evolutionary biology. While growing up, Dembski was neither particularly religious nor did he question the theory of evolution.

Dembski attended an all-male Catholic preparatory school in Chicago. He finished high school a year early, excelling in math and finishing a calculus course in one summer. After high school, Dembski attended the University of Chicago, where he experienced educational and personal difficulties, struggling with the advanced courses and finding the unfamiliar social milieu of college challenging. He dropped out of school and worked at his mother's art business while reading works on creationism and the Bible. Finding the creationist works interesting in their challenge of evolution but their literal interpretations lacking, Dembski returned to school at the University of Illinois at Chicago, studying statistics.

It was in 1988 at a conference on randomness that Dembski began to believe that there was purpose, order, and design in the universe by the intervention of God. Remaining in academia, Dembski ultimately completed an undergraduate degree in psychology at the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1981 and master's degrees in statistics, mathematics, and philosophy (1983, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1985, University of Chicago; 1993, University of Illinois at Chicago, respectively), two PhDs, one in mathematics and one in philosophy (1988, University of Chicago; 1996, University of Illinois at Chicago, respectively), and a Master of Divinity in theology at the Princeton Theological Seminary (1996).

At the Princeton Theological Seminary, Dembski met his future wife, Jana. Dissatisfied with what he called the "free-swinging academic style" of the school, Dembski also was involved in a group known as the Charles Hodge Society. Based on the works of the 19th century thinker Charles Hodge, the group was devoted to strengthening the faith of students faced with what members believed to be the "theological disarray" of the times, and to providing an example of how to oppose "false and destructive ideas." It published a journal (a recreation of the Princeton Theological Review (1903–1929)) and met with considerable opposition on the campus, facing two lawsuits, threats of violence, accusations of racism and sexism; being denied funding; and hearing that membership "jeopardized their academic advancement."

Dembski and Jana have one daughter and two sons. One of his sons has autism and Dembski has attributed some of his son's problems to vaccines.

Early opposition to evolution

Dembski holds that his knowledge of statistics and his skepticism concerning evolutionary theory led him to believe that the extraordinary diversity of life was statistically unlikely to have been produced by natural selection. His first significant contribution to intelligent design was his 1991 paper, "Randomness by Design," published in the philosophy journal Noûs.

Former UC Berkeley law school professor Phillip E. Johnson's book Darwin on Trial (1991) attracted a group of scholars who shared his view that the exclusion of supernatural explanations by the scientific method was unfair and had led to the Edwards v. Aguillard ruling that teaching creation science in public schools was unconstitutional. Dembski was part of that group at a symposium at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, in March 1992, before they came to call themselves "The Wedge."

Dembski wrote a contribution to the 1994 book The Creation Hypothesis. Another chapter, contributed by the creationists Charles Thaxton and Walter L Bradley, discussed "design detection" and redefined "specified complexity" as a way of measuring information. These ideas led to Dembski's notion of specified complexity, which he developed in The Design Inference, a 1998 revision of his PhD dissertation in philosophy.

In 1987, the phrase "intelligent design" replaced "creation science" in drafts of a book, Of Pandas and People, that was intended for secondary school students. The phrase referred to the idea that life was created through unspecified processes by an intelligent but unidentified designer. The book asserted that there was a logical need for such a designer because of the appearance of design in biological organisms. This replacement was intended to evade the Edwards v. Aguillard ruling. The book was published in 1989 amidst campaigning by the publisher for the introduction of "intelligent design" into school science classes.

Biochemist Michael Behe, another member of "The Wedge," contributed the argument that he subsequently called "irreducible complexity" to a subsequent edition of Pandas in 1993. The book contained concepts which Dembski later elaborated in his treatment of "specified complexity."

Discovery Institute

Main article: Discovery Institute

After completing graduate school in 1996, Dembski was unable to secure a university position; from then until 1999 he received what he calls "a standard academic salary" of $40,000 a year as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. "I was one of the early beneficiaries of Discovery largess," says Dembski.

Until September 2016, Dembski served as a senior fellow at the CSC, where he played a central role in the center's extensive public and political campaigns advancing the concept of intelligent design and its teaching in public schools through its "Teach the Controversy" campaign as part of the institute's wedge strategy. He has since resigned his fellowship position with the Discovery Institute.

Baylor University

Michael Polanyi Center controversy

Main article: Michael Polanyi Center

In 1999, Dembski was invited by Robert B. Sloan, President of Baylor University, to establish the Michael Polanyi Center at the university. Named after the Hungarian physical chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi (1891–1976), Dembski described it as "the first intelligent design think tank at a research university." Dembski had known Sloan for about three years, having taught Sloan's daughter at a Christian study summer camp not far from Waco, Texas. Sloan was the first Baptist minister to serve as Baylor's president in over 30 years, had read some of Dembski's work and liked it; according to Dembski, Sloan "made it clear that he wanted to get me on the faculty in some way." The salaries were supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation.

The Polanyi Center was established without much publicity in October 1999, initially consisting of two people – Dembski and a like-minded colleague, Bruce L. Gordon, who were hired directly by Sloan without going through the usual channels of a search committee and departmental consultation. The vast majority of Baylor staff did not know of the center's existence until its website went online, and the center stood outside of the existing religion, science, and philosophy departments.

The center's mission, and the lack of consultation with the Baylor faculty, became the immediate subject of controversy. The faculty feared for the university's reputation – it has historically been well regarded for its contributions to mainstream science – and scientists outside the university questioned whether Baylor had "gone fundamentalist." Faculty members pointed out that the university's existing interdisciplinary Institute for Faith and Learning was already addressing questions about the relationship between science and religion, making the existence of the Polanyi Center somewhat redundant. In April 2000, Dembski hosted a conference on "naturalism in science" sponsored by the John Templeton Foundation and the hub of the intelligent design movement, the Discovery Institute, seeking to address the question "Is there anything beyond nature?" Most of the Baylor faculty boycotted the conference.

A few days later, the Baylor faculty senate voted by a margin of 27–2 to ask the administration to dissolve the center and merge it with the Institute for Faith and Learning. President Sloan refused, citing issues of censorship and academic integrity, but agreed to convene an outside committee to review the center. The committee recommended setting up a faculty advisory panel to oversee the science and religion components of the program, dropping the name "Michael Polanyi" and reconstituting the center as part of the Institute for Faith and Learning. These recommendations were accepted in full by the university administration.

In a subsequent press release, Dembski asserted that the committee had given an "unqualified affirmation of my own work on intelligent design," that its report "marks the triumph of intelligent design as a legitimate form of academic inquiry" and that "dogmatic opponents of design who demanded the Center be shut down have met their Waterloo. Baylor University is to be commended for remaining strong in the face of intolerant assaults on freedom of thought and expression."

Dembski's remarks were criticized by other members of the Baylor faculty, who protested that they were both an unjustified attack on his critics at Baylor and a false assertion that the university endorsed Dembski's controversial views on intelligent design. Charles Weaver, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor and one of the most vocal critics of the Polanyi Center, commented: "In academic arguments, we don't seek utter destruction and defeat of our opponents. We don't talk about Waterloos."

President Sloan asked Dembski to withdraw his press release, but Dembski refused, accusing the university of "intellectual McCarthyism" (borrowing a phrase that Sloan himself had used when they first tried to dissolve the center). He declared that the university's action had been taken "in the utmost of bad faith ... thereby providing the fig leaf of justification for my removal." Professor Michael Beaty, director of the Institute for Faith and Learning, said that Dembski's remarks violated the spirit of cooperation that the committee had advocated and stated that "Dr. Dembski's actions after the release of the report compromised his ability to serve as director." Dembski was removed as the center's director, although he remained an associate research professor until May 2005. He was not asked to teach any courses in that time and instead worked from home, writing books and speaking around the country. "In a sense, Baylor did me a favor," he said. "I had a five-year sabbatical."

Seminary teaching

From 1999 to 2005, he was on the faculty of Baylor University, where he was a focus of attention and controversy. During the academic year 2005–2006, he was briefly the Carl F. H. Henry Professor of Theology and Science at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, as well as the first director of the school's new Center for Theology and Science (since replaced by prominent creationist Kurt Wise). The seminary teaches creationism but its professors vary on the details, with most adhering to the young Earth creationist viewpoint of a relatively recent creation which occurred literally as described in Genesis; Dembski does not hold to young Earth creationism (YEC). On his position at Southern, Dembski also remarked that "Theology is where my ultimate passion is and I think that is where I can uniquely contribute." He left Southern in May 2006. Starting in June 2006 he became a professor in philosophy at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (SWBTS) in Fort Worth, Texas. Since taking up a position within Southwestern's School of Theology in June 2006, Dembski has taught a number of courses within its Department of Philosophy of Religion. For some of his courses, he requires that his students promote intelligent design on "hostile" websites for course credit. The Southern Baptist Convention operates both seminaries.

In September 2007, the SWBTS hosted a conference, "Intelligent Design in Business Practice," presented by Dembski, Acton Institute theologian Jay Richards, and three business academics presently or formerly teaching at universities in the Southern United States.

Mims–Pianka controversy

Main article: Eric Pianka

On April 2, 2006, Dembski stated on his blog that he reported Eric Pianka to the Department of Homeland Security because he and fellow Discovery Institute Fellow Forrest Mims felt that Pianka's speech while accepting the Texas Academy of Science's Distinguished Texas Scientist Award in 2006 fomented bioterrorism. This resulted in the Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewing Pianka in Austin. On April 5, Dembski wagered that Pianka's popularity would drop if the full text of his speech to the Texas Academy of Science were made public.

Baylor Evolutionary Informatics Lab controversy

Subsequently, in July and August 2007, Dembski played a central role in the formation of the Evolutionary Informatics Lab (EIL), cofounded with Baylor University Engineering Professor Robert J. Marks II. According to Baylor administration, the EIL website hosted at Baylor was deleted because it violated university policy forbidding professors from creating the impression that their personal views represent Baylor as an institution. Dembski says the website was removed because it dealt with intelligent design. Baylor said they would permit Marks to repost his website on their server, provided a 108-word disclaimer accompany any intelligent design-advancing research to make clear that the work does not represent the university's position. The site now resides on a third-party server and still contains the material advancing intelligent design. Dembski's participation was funded by a $30,000 grant from the Lifeworks Foundation, which is controlled by researcher Brendan Dixon of the Biologic Institute (which has close ties to the Discovery Institute).

Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary flood controversy

While serving as a professor at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Dembski wrote The End of Christianity, which argued that a Christian can reconcile an old Earth creationist view with a literal reading of Adam and Eve in the Bible by accepting the scientific consensus of a 4.5 billion year of Earth. He further argued that Noah's flood likely was a phenomenon limited to the Middle East. This caused controversy and Dembski's reading of the Bible was criticized by Tom Nettles, a young Earth creationist, in The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, Southern Seminary's official theological journal. In 2010, the dean of Southwestern's School of Theology, David Allen, "released a White Paper through the seminary's Center for Theological Research defending Dembski as within the bounds of orthodoxy and critiquing Nettles for misunderstanding the book. The paper included Dembski's statement admitting error regarding Noah's flood." Southwestern Seminary president Paige Patterson, a young Earth creationist, "said that when Dembski's questionable statements came to light, he convened a meeting with Dembski and several high-ranking administrators at the seminary. At that meeting, Dembski was quick to admit that he was wrong about the flood. "'Had I had any inkling that Dr. Dembski was actually denying the absolute trustworthiness of the Bible, then that would have, of course, ended his relationship with the school,' he said."

Public advocacy

Part of a series on
Intelligent design
ClockworkWatchmaker analogy
Concepts
Movement
Campaigns
Authors
Organisations
Reactions
Creationism

In December 2001, Dembski launched the International Society for Complexity, Information and Design (ISCID), of which he is Executive Director. Dembski is also the editor-in-chief of ISCID's journal, Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design (PCID), which appears to have ceased publication with its November 2005 issue. He has several more books in preparation as well as producing an Adobe Flash animation mocking Judge John E. Jones III, who presided in the landmark 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case. He is also a member of American Scientific Affiliation, the Evangelical Philosophical Society, and the American Mathematical Society, and is a senior fellow of the Wilberforce Forum.

Dembski frequently gives public talks, principally to religious, pro-ID groups, and creationists. Barbara Forrest and Paul R. Gross noted that Dembski has not been hesitant in associating with young Earth creationists, such as attending conferences with Carl Baugh.

Dembski, along with fellow Discovery Institute associates Michael Behe and David Berlinski, tutored Ann Coulter on science and evolution for her book Godless: The Church of Liberalism (2006). Approximately one-third of the book is devoted to polemical attacks on evolution, which Coulter, as Dembski often does, terms "Darwinism."

Dembski participated in the documentary film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, released in 2008. Dembski told the Southern Baptist Texan that those who need to see the movie are the "parents of children in high school or college, as well as those children themselves, who may think that the biological sciences are a dispassionate search for truth about life but many of whose practitioners see biology, especially evolutionary biology, as an ideological weapon to destroy faith in God." Dembski has appeared on several television shows, including a 2005 interview with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show with Edward Larson and Ellie Crystal where he said he accepted religion before science.

Writing

See also: The Design Inference, Intelligent Design (book), and List of works on intelligent design

In 1998, Dembski published his first book, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities, which became a Cambridge University Press bestselling philosophical monograph.

In 2002, Dembski published his book No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Dembski's work was strongly criticized within the scientific community, which argued that there were a number of major logical inconsistencies and evidential gaps in Dembski's hypothesis. David Wolpert, co-creator of the No free lunch theorem on which Dembski based his book, characterized his arguments as "fatally informal and imprecise," "written in jello," reminiscent of philosophical discussion "of art, music, and literature, as well as much of ethics" rather than of scientific debate.

Mathematician Mark Perakh has stated he believes Dembski overemphasizes his own self-importance in his writing.

Peer-review controversy

One of the common objections to intelligent design being accepted as valid science is that ID proponents have published no scientific papers in the peer-reviewed scientific literature in support of their conjectures. The ruling in the 2005 Dover trial, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, found that intelligent design had not been tested by the process of being published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and was not supported by any peer-reviewed research, data or publications. Despite the Dover trial ruling, the Discovery Institute lists Dembski's 1998 book The Design Inference under the heading "Peer-Reviewed Scientific Books Supportive of Intelligent Design Published by Trade Presses or University Presses." The Discovery Institute describes Dembski as a mathematician and philosopher, who includes in his credentials a B.A. in psychology and postdoctoral work in mathematics, physics and computer science.

In an expert report, computer scientist and number theorist Jeffrey Shallit states that despite common claims in the popular and religious press, Dembski is not a scientist by any reasonable standard, has not published any experimental or empirical tests of his claims, submitted his claims to the scrutiny of his peers or been published in a scientific journal. In a footnote, Shallit states that he does not consider mathematics to be science. Shallit describes Dembski's published mathematical output as "extremely small" for a research mathematician and remarks that "it is very unlikely that his meagre output would merit tenure at any major university."

Since Shallit's statement, Dembski has (as of May 2010) published four peer-reviewed papers in information theory venues associated with the IEEE professional society. The papers deal with active information in the context of searches for solutions to problems. Quantified active information is introduced in "Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success." A second paper, "Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism," claims to deconstruct the evolution simulation Avida by uncovering the sources of active information in the program. A third paper discusses the role of Jacob Bernoulli's principle of indifference in the analysis of evolution. The most recent paper, "Efficient Per Query Information Extraction from a Hamming Oracle," calculates the performance of various search algorithms which use the Hamming distance to search for a single string of a certain length in the set of all strings of this length.

Dembski states that his book The Design Inference has also been peer-reviewed: "This book was published by Cambridge University Press and peer-reviewed as part of a distinguished monograph series, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory." In his expert report, Shallit states, "I know that book manuscripts typically do not receive the same sort of scrutiny that research articles do. ...it is not uncommon for a 10-page paper to receive 5 pages or more of comments, whereas a book manuscript of two hundred pages often receives about the same number...." In addition, Mark Isaak claims that Dembski's book was reviewed by philosophers and not biologists.

The Inner Life of the Cell copyright controversy

In November 2007, a graduate student named S. A. Smith brought an apparent case of wholesale academic misuse of unlicensed content to public attention. She noticed that a video used by Dembski in his lecture was identical to The Inner Life of the Cell animation created by Harvard University and XVIVO Scientific Animation. The audio track giving a scientific explanation was stripped off and the video was used with an alternative narration. The matter was brought to the attention of Harvard and XVIVO. David Bolinsky, creator of the video, wrote that Dembski was warned about using the video without permission.

In response to the allegations, Dembski has claimed that he downloaded the video from the Internet, and added a voiceover narration that he deemed appropriate for his audience. According to Dembski, the downloaded version omitted the opening credits but contained the closing credits, which were shown to the audience. However, Smith later documented several instances where images from the Harvard/XVIVO animation were apparently removed from his book The Design of Life (2008) but the related footnotes and references were not. indicating that Dembski was already aware that permission had been denied for him to use the animation when he delivered his presentation at the University of Oklahoma.

On April 9, 2008, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a movie Dembski appears in, was given a cease-and-desist by XVIVO accusing Premise Media, the Expelled producers, of plagiarism concerning the same video. A June 2008 Premise Media press release announced Premise Media and XVIVO, LLC, "reached an agreement" noting "XVIVO has agreed that the Premise Media documentary does not infringe on any of XVIVO's intellectual property rights."

Evolution

Main article: Evolution

Dembski's views on evolution have been a source of considerable controversy within both the mainstream scientific and creationist communities. Dembski does not accept universal common descent. His mainstream scientific critics have accused him of dishonesty in his representation of scientific facts and writing, and he has also been criticised by the traditional creationist community for not supporting the young Earth creationist position, though this community does defend some of his other arguments.

Science vs. naturalism

Dembski objects to the presence of the theory of evolution in a variety of disciplines, presenting intelligent design as an alternative to reductionist materialism that gives a sense of purpose that the unguided evolutionary process lacks and the ultimate significance of ID is its success in undermining materialism and naturalism. Dembski has also stated that ID has little chance as a serious scientific theory as long as methodological naturalism is the basis for science. Although intelligent design proponents (including Dembski) have made little apparent effort to publish peer-reviewed scientific research to support their hypotheses, in recent years they have made vigorous efforts to promote the teaching of intelligent design in schools. Dembski is a strong supporter of this drive as a means of making young people more receptive to intelligent design, and said he wants "to see intelligent design flourish as a scientific research program" among a "new generation of scholars" willing to consider the theory and textbooks that include it.

Intelligent designer

See also: Intelligent designer

Dembski's theories do not attempt to explain the origin of the intelligent designer that created the universe, which he argues is unnecessary, since such an intelligent designer is likely outside the dimensions of space and time which are the subject of empirical science.

He has not had any of his pro-intelligent-design articles published in peer-reviewed mainstream scientific journals. While intelligent design proponents often allege that such failure to be published is due to a pro-evolution bias or conspiracy, Dembski himself has said he prefers to disseminate his ideas in non-peer-reviewed media: "I've just gotten kind of blasé about submitting things to journals where you often wait two years to get things into print. And I find I can actually get the turnaround faster by writing a book and getting the ideas expressed there. My books sell well. I get a royalty. And the material gets read more."

In December 2007, Dembski told Focus on the Family that "The Designer of intelligent design is, ultimately, the Christian God."

Specified complexity

Main article: Specified complexity

Specified complexity is a concept which Dembski has proposed and used in his works promoting intelligent design, an argument intended to give a formal definition of patterns that are both specified and complex. He claims it is a reliable marker of design by an intelligent agent, a central concept of intelligent design, as opposed to natural selection in modern evolutionary theory. The concept of specified complexity is widely regarded as mathematically unsound and has not been the basis for further independent work in information theory, complexity theory, or biology. Specified complexity is one of the two main arguments used by intelligent design proponents, the other being irreducible complexity.

Intelligent design and Christianity

Dembski's position on intelligent design's relationship with Christianity has been inconsistent. He has suggested that the "intelligent designer" is not necessarily synonymous with a god: "It could be space aliens. There are many possibilities," but has on several occasions been explicit in labelling the designer as the Christian god and linking ID with a religious revival through which Christianity can be restored to its formerly pre-eminent place in society, supplanting "materialist" science. In his book Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology he states "The conceptual soundings of the theory can in the end only be located in Christ." On his website, DesignInference.com, Dembski said that intelligent design provides an intellectual basis to restore Christian philosophy over materialism.

Dembski has also spoken of his motivation for supporting intelligent design in a series of Sunday lectures in the Fellowship Baptist Church in Waco, Texas, the last of which took place on March 7, 2004. Answering a question, Dembski said it was to enable God to receive credit for creation.

Intelligent design movement

Dembski sees intelligent design as being a popular movement as well as a scientific hypothesis and claims that it is in the process of dislodging evolution from the public imagination. At the CSICOP's 4th World Skeptics Conference, held on June 20–23, 2002, in Burbank, California, he told the audience that "over the next twenty-five years ID will provide the greatest challenge to skepticism." He asserted that "ID is threatening to be mainstream," and that polls show 90 percent support for the hypothesis, indicating that it has "already becom mainstream within the public themselves." "The usual skeptical retorts are not going to work against ID" and ID "turns the tables on skepticism." Evolution, in his view, "is the ultimate status quo" and "squelches dissent." Young people, who "love rebellion" see that and are attracted to ID as a result. "The public supports intelligent design. The public is tired of being bullied by an intellectual elite." He contends that skeptics resort to rhetoric and "artificially define ID out of science," admitting only materialistic explanations as legitimate. ID "paints the more appealing world picture," whereas skepticism works by being negative, which "doesn't set well with the public... To most people evolution doesn't provide a compelling view."

Bible code

Dembski has also indicated an interest in the Bible code. In a favorable book review of Jeffrey Satinover's Cracking the Bible Code (1997), Dembski wrote that "The philosopher Bertrand Russell was once asked why he didn't believe in God. He replied, 'Not enough evidence.' Satinover's fascination with the Bible Code is that it may provide evidence for God's existence that would have convinced even a Bertrand Russell."

Faith healing

Dembski once took his family to a meeting conducted by Todd Bentley, a faith healer, in hopes of receiving a "miraculous healing" for his son, who is autistic. In an article for the Baptist Press he recalled disappointment with the nature of the meeting and with the prevention of his son and other attendees from joining those in wheelchairs who were selected to receive prayer. He then concluded, "Minimal time was given to healing, though plenty was devoted to assaulting our senses with blaring insipid music and even to Bentley promoting and selling his own products (books and CDs)." He wrote that he did not regret the trip and called it an "education," which showed "how easily religion can be abused, in this case to exploit our family."

Responses to critics

Dembski previews material on the Internet for open peer review. This helps identify errors and address objections prior to publication, allowing him to get "the last word in the exchange." Dembski's style in response to his critics (particularly of his mathematical papers) is polemical. For instance, in reply to a critique of the "law of conservation of information" posted on talkreason.org, Dembski states: "I'm not and never have been in the business of offering a strict mathematical proof for the inability of material mechanisms to generate specified complexity in the same way that no physicist is in the business of offering a strict mathematical proof for the conservation of energy."

Publications

Books

Sole author

Co-author

As editor or contributor

Notes

  1. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. hdl:1854/LU-952482. PMID 21243965. S2CID 27218269. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Article available from Universiteit Gent
  2. ^ "William A. Dembski, Senior Fellow - CSC". Discovery Institute. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2014. A mathematician and philosopher, William A. Dembski is Senior Fellow with Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture.
  3. "Official Retirement from Intelligent Design". September 23, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  4. "William Dembski: Why I'm Returning to the Front Lines of Intelligent Design". Evolution News. February 16, 2021. Retrieved June 30, 2021.
  5. "William Dembski". Southern Evangelical Seminary. Matthews, NC: Southern Evangelical Seminary. Archived from the original on July 3, 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  6. Dembski, William A. (1996). "The Explanatory Filter: A three-part filter for understanding how to separate and identify cause from intelligent design" ("An excerpt from a paper presented at the 1996 Mere Creation conference, originally titled 'Redesigning Science.'"). Retrieved September 27, 2009. See Chapter 4 of Mere Creation (1998), "Redesigning Science".
  7. Dembski 1999, pp. 10, 107
  8. Young & Edis 2004, pp. 1–19, 107–138, 185–196
  9. Dembski, William A. (November 17, 2000). "Intelligent Design Coming Clean". Access Research Network. Colorado Springs, CO. Retrieved August 11, 2010.
  10. ^ Kern, Lauren (December 14, 2000). "In God's Country". Houston Press. Houston, TX: Voice Media Group. OCLC 29800759. Retrieved August 11, 2010.
  11. "CV/Resumé of William A. Dembski". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  12. Dembski 2009, p. xviii
  13. ^ Dembski & Richards 2001, "Introduction: Reclaiming Theological Education," pp. 11–27 (PDF)
  14. Brierley, Justin (January 9, 2010). "Bill Dembski & Norman Hansen on Natural Evil". Unbelievable? (Podcast). Premier Christian Radio. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  15. Dembski 1991
  16. "Writings of William A. Dembski". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  17. Forrest & Gross 2004, p. 18
  18. Forrest 2001
  19. "Review: Origins of Life". NCSE. December 15, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  20. Dembski 1998a, p. xv
  21. Forrest, Barbara (May 2007). "Understanding The Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals" (PDF). Center for Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  22. Wilgoren, Jodi (August 21, 2005). "Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive". The New York Times. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  23. ^ Kern, Lauren (January 11, 2001) . "Monkey Business". Dallas Observer. Dallas, TX: Voice Media Group. ISSN 0732-0299. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  24. Forrest, Barbara; Gross, Paul R. (2007). Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press. p. 306. ISBN 9780195319736.
  25. Cooper, William F. (External Review Committee Chairman) (October 16, 2000). "Polanyi Review Committee Report - 001017polanyi.pdf" (PDF). pr.baylor.edu. Waco, TX: Baylor University. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 10, 2003. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  26. Dembski, William A. (October 17, 2000). "Polanyi Center Press Release". Archived from the original on January 6, 2008. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  27. Siemon-Netto, Uwe (December 21, 2000). "Commentary: It's Perilous to Ponder the Design of the Universe". United Press International. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  28. Dembski, William A. (October 19, 2000). "Statement by William Dembski on His Removal as Director of the Michael Polanyi Center at Baylor University". Archived from the original on June 28, 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  29. Brumley, Larry (October 19, 2000). "Dembski relieved of duties as Polanyi Center Director". Archived from the original on June 28, 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  30. Sandefur, Timothy (October 4, 2005). "The Pseudo-Science Amicus Brief in Kitzmiller". The Panda's Thumb (Blog). Houston, TX: The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  31. Smith, Peter (April 16, 2006). "Creationist to will lead seminary science center". The Courier-Journal. Louisville, KY: Gannett Company. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  32. ^ Robinson, Jeff (September 16, 2004). "Dembski to head seminary's new science & theology center". Baptist Press. Nashville, TN: Southern Baptist Convention. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  33. ^ "School of Theology - Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary: William Dembski". Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Fort Worth, TX: Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Archived from the original on May 5, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  34. ^ "Teaching: Courses taught by William A. Dembski". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  35. "Evolution vs. intelligent design: The battle continues". ReligionLink. Westerville, OH: Religion Newswriters Association; Religion News LLC. October 8, 2007. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2014. Current version and URL of the article here Archived January 10, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
  36. Dembski, William (April 2, 2006). "Eric Pianka: The Department of Homeland Security needs to interview you". Uncommon Descent (Blog). Uncommon Descent, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  37. Heinauer, Laura (April 5, 2006). "Professor's population speeches unnerve some". Austin American-Statesman. Austin, TX: Cox Enterprises. ISSN 1553-8451. Archived from the original on April 27, 2006. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  38. Dembski, William (April 6, 2006). "[UPDATE:] $1000 reward and $1000 bet — Pianka again". Uncommon Descent (Blog). Uncommon Descent, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  39. Luskin, Casey (February 7, 2012). "The Evolutionary Informatics Lab: Putting Intelligent Design Predictions to the Test". Evolution News & Views. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  40. Dembski, William A. (May 6, 2010). "FIRST-PERSON: Vindication for I.D. at Baylor?". Baptist Press. Nashville, TN: Southern Baptist Convention. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  41. Bergin, Mark (September 15, 2007). "Not so fast". World. 22 (33). ISSN 0888-157X. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  42. Luskin, Casey (July 22, 2007). "William Dembski Addresses Forthcoming Intelligent Design Research that Advances ID and Answers Critics (updated)". Evolution News & Views. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  43. Bergin, Mark (August 25, 2007). "Crisis averted". World. 22 (31). ISSN 0888-157X. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  44. Farrell, Elizabeth F. (September 4, 2007). "Baylor U. Removes a Web Page Associated With Intelligent Design From Its Site". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: The Chronicle of Higher Education Inc. ISSN 0009-5982. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  45. "The Evolutionary Informatics Lab - EvoInfo.org". Evolutionary Informatics Lab. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  46. "031248d0.tif - 911942043_200612_990PF.pdf" (PDF) (IRS Form 990-PF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2014. Return of Private Foundation (2006): The Lifeworks Foundation.
  47. Dembski 2009, p. 55: "The young earth-solution to reconciling the order of creation with natural history makes good exegetical and theological sense. Indeed, the overwhelming consensus of theologians up through the Reformation held to this view. I myself would adopt it in a heartbeat except that nature seems to present such strong evidence against it."
  48. ^ Roach, David (October 20, 2010). "How Old? Age of Earth debated among SBC scholars". Florida Baptist Witness. Jacksonville, FL: Florida Baptist State Convention. ISSN 1092-7409. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  49. Nettles, Tom J. (2009). "The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World" (PDF). The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology (Book review). 13 (4): 80–85. ISSN 1520-7307. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved December 28, 2012.
  50. Allen 2010
  51. Branch, Glenn (November–December 2010). "The Latest 'Intelligent Design' Journal". Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 30 (6): 10–13. ISSN 2158-818X. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  52. "Judge Jones and the ACLU". Overwhelming Evidence. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Archived from the original (Small Web Format (SWF)) on January 10, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  53. Forrest & Gross 2004, p. 293
  54. Coulter 2007, p. 319: "I couldn't have written about evolution without the generous tutoring of Michael Behe, David Berlinski, and William Dembski, all of whom are fabulous at translating complex ideas, unlike liberal arts types, who constantly force me to the dictionary to relearn the meaning of quotidian."
  55. Dembski, William (June 12, 2006). "Ann Coulter: The Wedge for the Masses". Uncommon Descent (Blog). Uncommon Descent, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  56. Pierce, Jerry (January 28, 2008). "Baptist professors featured in new film" (PDF). Southern Baptist Texan. OCLC 46698671. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  57. Stewart, Jon (host) (September 14, 2005). "Evolution, Schmevolution - Panel: Edward J. Larson, William A. Dembski, Ellie Crystal". The Daily Show. Comedy Central. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  58. Wolpert, David H. "William Dembski's Treatment of the No Free Lunch Theorems is Written in Jello". Talk Reason. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  59. Forrest & Gross 2004, p. 118
  60. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, p. 87
  61. "Intelligent Design and Peer Review". American Association for the Advancement of Science. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on March 12, 2007. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  62. "Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. February 1, 2012. Archived from the original on August 4, 2007. Retrieved December 28, 2012. The July 1, 2007, version of page is .
  63. West, John G. (December 4, 2005). "Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker? Ignorance on Display in the New York Times". Evolution News & Views. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  64. ^ Shallit, Jeffrey (May 16, 2005). "Expert Report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014. Shallit's expert report in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
  65. Dembski & Marks 2009a
  66. Ewert, Dembski & Marks 2009
  67. Dembski & Marks 2009b
  68. Ewert, Montañez, Dembski & Marks 2010
  69. Dembski, William (October 10, 2003). "Peer Review – Response to Eugenie Scott and the NCSE". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  70. Isaak, Mark (ed.). "Index to Creationist Claims: Claim CI001.4". TalkOrigins Archive. Houston, TX: The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  71. Bolinsky, David (April 10, 2008). "'Expelled' ripped off Harvard's 'Inner Life of the Cell' animation". RichardDawkins.net. Arlington, VA: Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Archived from the original on April 13, 2008. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  72. Dembski, William A. (November 27, 2007). "News Release: Harvard's XVIVO Video". Uncommon Descent. Uncommon Descent, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  73. Smith, Abbie (December 17, 2007). "Dembski, Copyright, and 'Design of Life'". EVR (Blog). Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  74. ^ Smith, Abbie (December 24, 2007). "Discovery Institute, Dembski, Copyright, and 'Design of Life'". EVR (Blog). Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  75. Bolinsky, David (April 9, 2008). "Re: Copyright infringement in 'Expelled: No Intel ligence Allowed'" (PDF) (Letter to Logan Craft). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  76. Erhardt, Megan; Hutchins, Mary Beth (July 24, 2008). "EXPELLED/XVIVO Agreement: No Infringement" (Press release). Dallas, TX: Premise Media. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  77. Dembski, William A. "An Interview with Dr. William A. Dembski (Updated)" (Interview). Interviewed by Mario Lopez. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  78. Inlay, Matt (February 16, 2005). "Bill Dembski and the case of the unsupported assertion". The Panda's Thumb (Blog). Houston, TX: The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  79. Rosenhouse, Jason (November–December 2005). "Why Do Scientists Get So Angry When Dealing With ID Proponents?". Skeptical Inquirer. 29 (6). ISSN 0194-6730. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  80. Sarfati, Jonathan (February 7, 2005). "ID theorist blunders on Bible (response to Dembski)". Creation.com. Creation Ministries International. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  81. Truman, Royal (August 1999). "Divining design". Journal of Creation (Book review). 13 (2): 34–39. ISSN 1036-2916. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  82. Truman, Royal (April 2000). "Designer science". Journal of Creation (Book review). 14 (1): 28–34. ISSN 1036-2916. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  83. "Baptist School Afraid of Creation". Answers in Genesis. Hebron, KY: Answers in Genesis of Kentucky, Inc. October 28, 2000. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  84. Pike, Deidre (February 24, 2005). "Evolution Revolution". Las Vegas City Life. Las Vegas, NV: Stephens Media LLC. Retrieved August 9, 2010.
  85. Dembski 1995
  86. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, pp. 63–139
  87. Forrest & Gross 2004, p. 301
  88. McMurtrie, Beth (December 21, 2001). "Darwinism Under Attack". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: The Chronicle of Higher Education Inc. ISSN 0009-5982. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  89. Williams, Devon (December 14, 2007). "Friday Five: William A. Dembski". CitizenLink.com. Colorado Springs, CO: Focus on the Family Action, Inc. Archived from the original on December 17, 2007. Retrieved May 17, 2008.
  90. Baldwin, Rich (July 14, 2005). "Information Theory and Creationism: William Dembski". TalkOrigins Archive. Houston, TX: The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  91. Perakh, Mark (March 18, 2005). "Dembski 'displaces Darwinism' mathematically – or does he?". Talk Reason. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  92. Rosenhouse, Jason (Fall 2001). "How Anti-Evolutionists Abuse Mathematics" (PDF). The Mathematical Intelligencer. 23 (4): 3–8. doi:10.1007/bf03024593. OCLC 3526661. S2CID 189888286. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  93. Hall, Carl T. (March 17, 2002). "Nature's diversity beyond evolution / Debate over 'intelligent design'". San Francisco Chronicle. Hearst Corporation. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  94. Dembski 1999, p. 210
  95. Dembski, William (February 1, 2005). "Intelligent Design's Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Archived from the original on February 17, 2005. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  96. Perakh, Mark (March 21, 2004). "The design revolution?". Talk Reason. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  97. Frazier, Kendrick; Radford, Ben (September–October 2002). "Fourth World Skeptics Conference in Burbank a Lively Foment of Ideas". Skeptical Inquirer. 26 (5). ISSN 0194-6730. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  98. Dembski, William A. (August–September 1998). "The Bible by Numbers". First Things (Book review) (85): 61–64. ISSN 1047-5141. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  99. Kofman, Jeffrey; Yiu, Karson; Brennan, Nicholas (July 9, 2008). "Thousands Flock to Revival in Search of Miracles". ABC News. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  100. ^ Dembski, William A. (July 11, 2008). "FIRST-PERSON: Faith & healing – Where's the evidence?". Baptist Press. Nashville, TN: Southern Baptist Convention. Retrieved May 17, 2008.
  101. Dembski, William A. (April 14, 2004). "Dealing with the Backlash". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Archived from the original on February 27, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  102. Tellgren, Erik (July 6, 2002). "On Dembski's Law of Conservation of Information" (PDF). Talk Reason. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  103. Dembski, William A. "If Only Darwinists Scrutinized Their Own Work as Closely: A Response to 'Erik'". DesignInference.com. Pella, IA: William Dembski. Retrieved January 10, 2014.

References

Further reading

Stewart, Robert B., ed. (2007). Intelligent Design: William A. Dembski & Michael Ruse in Dialogue. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press. ISBN 978-0-800-66218-9. LCCN 2007027505. OCLC 148895223.

External links

Official

Reviews/analysis of Dembski

Biographical information

Other

Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
Presidents
Faculty
Founding
Former
Present
Publications
Categories: