| Revision as of 06:14, 7 September 2010 editShell Kinney (talk | contribs)33,094 edits →User:QuackGuru: yep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:55, 18 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,997 edits not around since Sept 2011 | ||
| (868 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=23 September 2011}} | |||
| {{User:Shell Kinney/talkheader}} | {{User:Shell Kinney/talkheader}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 16 | ||
| |algo = old(240h) | |algo = old(240h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Shell Kinney/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Shell Kinney/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== pass-out teh baked goodies == | ||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| Sorry to bother you again, but is unwelcome. In the spirit of defusing, I'm not filling an enforcement request; however, I'd like a clear statement that crying EEML WITCH!, offering personal opinions re-litigating EEML, synthesis of personal victomology at the hands of EEML and all, <s>are</s> <u>may be considered</u> sanctionable WP:BATTLEGROUND offenses. ]<small> ►]</small> 16:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Sanctionable, I don't know but unhelpful, certainly. There is certainly a serious problem here with a number of people being unable/unwilling to drop the stick. Unfortunately it looks like it's heading to site bans. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : is getting a bit too far indeed. I am not sure that I understand what he means, but it doesn't sound good. ] (]) 01:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well if you look at the second link, it's a news article about intimidation, but that is a rather odd comment. If someone feels their participation at an article could be harmful, they should really consider working elsewhere. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The only limits are those of my patience. You well know if I respond to this sort of goading I'll be the one accused of "not disengaging." ]<small> ►]</small> 02:33, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) has given you a ]! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <br /> | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 30 August 2010 == | |||
| To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}! | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/{{#switch: 1 | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| | 1 = 2010-08-30 | |||
| | 2 = Volume 6, Issue 35 | |||
| | 3 = 2010-08-23 | |||
| | 4 = 2010-09-06 | |||
| }}}} | |||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 16:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)</div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0066 --> | |||
| == Is your revert possibly overbroad? == | |||
| == Milhist A-Class and Peer reviews Jan-Jun 2010 == | |||
| {{Talkback|Geofferybard}} | |||
| {| style="border: 2px solid lightsteelblue; background-color: whitesmoke;" | |||
| ]June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |  ''''']'''''  | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | By order of the '']'', for your good work helping with the WikiProject's ] and ] reviews for the period Jan-Jun 2010, I hereby award you this ''] Reviewers' award''. ] (]) 02:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC) <p><small>Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{tlx|WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| <p> | |||
| == Questions about a deleted turquoise serpent == | |||
| == Redirected to Arbcom == | |||
| It seems that an inexperienced editor is trying to ask you a question at ]. ] (]) 23:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| I'll run through the short version after a conversation @Sandstein's. I would like to request that all personal user space pages of "evidence" editors gathered in preparing for the EEML litigation or related to prior Baltic/EE conflicts be deleted. More than 8 months after the EEML topic bans went into effect, a number of editors (regardless of "sides") have returned to contributing; nothing good will come of past collections of recriminations lying about. Is there a formal mechanism for submitting such a request? Please let me know if I should submit via Email. Best, ]<small> ►]</small> 15:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| :I will have to voice my strongest objection to this, as there are still outstanding issues related to the EEML case. I have made Vecrumba a suggestion on how he should proceed, if he really wants to bury the past, see ]. This unilateral proposal is not taking the issue anywhere, I see it only as preparation for a new battleground. -- ] (]) 20:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| :: I don't see anything that remains unresolved. Outsiders can allege and think whatever they want regarding content editing in the Baltic and Eastern European topic space, any interaction I have had with Petri Krohn and any content I have written or advocated for on-Wiki has been based solely on a fair an accurate representation of sources and would have been exactly the same whether or not there had been off-Wiki communication. Petri will be free to debate me based on sources when my topic ban expires. Until then, this sort of escalating accusation of bad faith{{mdash}}that I'm already planning for my war campaign when my topic ban expires in 129 days, 20 hours, 21 minutes and 24 seconds , and which threatens re-litigating everything WP:EEML{{mdash}}is unseemly at best. ]<small> ►]</small> 21:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::We just recently had all of the user evidence pages deleted after a case and I believe there was some talk of this being standard from now on. My best suggestion would be to ask for an amendment to the case requiring all of these pages be deleted (without adding in the extra baggage Petri suggested that doesn't even seem related).<p>Petri, your houding of certain editors is becoming apparent and may end in further sanctions if your behavior doesn't change post haste. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ::::Shell, I was deeply offended by your comment and your accusation that I have been “hounding” someone. I decided to cool down for an hour. | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| ::::Now, after four hours, I am not only offended, but also – I believe ] – angry. | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I ask that you issue a formal written apology for your comments. If you are unwilling to do that, I ask that you compile a list of the cases where you believe I have hounded someone – I suppose here you mean participants in the EEML arbitration case. I do not think you even need to do the work your self as the people you believe have been hounded would most likely volunteer their labor. | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| ::::As is well known, I have followed a voluntary topic ban on the disputes in the EE topic area and a related interaction ban on users who would later end up as the accused side in the EEML case – starting from the day in July 2007 when my request at WP:AN to have a community ban on user {{User|Digwuren}} was first rejected. (Note, that this happened before Digwuren contributed his first original contribution.) It is my firm belief – supported by massive amounts of evidence – that the interest shown by former participants in the mailing list to my user account is '''not''' related to my edits, but to the activities of a real life person who happens to share my username. | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| ::::I do admit to the following: | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| ::::*I have been following the edits of User Russavia, as he has been under harassment and may not always act in the best possible manner himself. I have also supported him in some cases where he has been attacked or accused. | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| ::::*I have commented on a very limited number of user talk pages, where accusations have been made against me – either directly or trough innuendo – by participants in the EEML arbitration case. In most cases this has happened long after the fact, as I do not follow the edits or talk pages of the users involved (I have now added some pages to my watchlist.) | |||
| }} | |||
| ::::*I have done a potentially very controversial non-admin closure of a WP:AE case involving Russavia. The action was taken in order to ] a forum for what was escalating into a major ]ground of EEML legacy. I did this under the presumption, that if anyone even hinted that my ] action was not absolutely the correct thing to do, I would revert the action and apologize to those affected. So far, no one has given me such a hint. (I believe Vercumba was one of the people whose butt I saved.) | |||
| --] (]) 06:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I do not see any of these actions as hounding. Neither should you. | |||
| ::::Yours, -- ] (]) 02:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I am frankly gobsmacked by this escalating ugliness. | |||
| :::::# My interest in your edits is your edits. Of course, I can't pursue Baltic/EE topics at the moment, although I must make the next observation. | |||
| :::::# You have not followed a voluntary topic ban as you indicate, as since your most recent return you've already edited the aftermath of WWII to describe the Soviet role in Eastern Europe by the Soviets. | |||
| :::::# I have no interest in your actions regarding Russavia{{mdash}}we are mutually happily prohibited from seeking out conflict with one another. I have no idea what "butt saving" you refer to. I commented to Igny; I left. | |||
| ::::: Perhaps you mistake me for someone more interested in conflict than in reputable content? ]<small> ►]</small> 03:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Petri, I'm sorry if my comments anger you, but having seen the various discussions you've popped up in lately for no apparent reason (here and Sanstein's talk being the most recent examples) I think it's remarkably clear that you are following around certain editors and stirring the pot. Vecrumba's request about user pages used as evidence was appropriate, especially given the recent ruling in another case which indicated that we don't intend to go on allowing these pages and at the very least expect to see them deleted at the close of a case. The acrimony that still exists over the EEML case is rather appalling; there seems to be a mindset among certain editors that those involved in the case deserve some kind of punishment or persecution for their actions - that's certainly not the way things are handled on Misplaced Pages. I strongly suggest that you reconsider your interactions with editors who were involved in the case and stop watching their edits.<p>Vecrumba, you absolutely may not try to link a Misplaced Pages editor to anything in real life or on another website unless they have brought the information here themselves first. If you have concerns about an editor or a conflict of interest where you would need to disclose such links, you are required to keep that information off site and handle it via email to ArbCom; anything else is ] and will result in a block. ] <sup>]</sup> 05:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Petri has confirmed the same on-Wiki. There is no "outing", this is merely an attempt to slander me and make me out to be a trouble maker attacking Petri for no good reason other than mistaking Wiki Petri Krohn for real-life Petri Krohn. I will send you by Wiki mail. In the mean time, I feel as if I'm being threatened with blocks (my perception, and quite upsetting as I came here for advice on how to move on and have gotten attacked by Petri for it) for violations I have not committed. Please keep your friendly advice friendly. Keep in mind also what this conversation was originally about and where it has gone since Petri inappropriately inserted himself to accuse me of nefarious behavior. ]<small> ►]</small> 15:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Letting you know == | |||
| Hello, Shell. Since you've voted in favour of two remedies concerning ChrisO, I wanted to let you know that I've brought up an issue with a clause in those remedies ]. ] ] 14:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I think other Arbs have covered it, but I felt the reason the clause was added was because even though ChrisO is taking time off, it's not time that he intends to edit Misplaced Pages. If he decided to come back, we would have no way of knowing whether or not the problems would begin again. If, for example, he decides to edit on another Wikimedia Project, shows the problem is resolved and then later wishes to return here, we would take that into consideration and amend the findings as appropriate. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Please explain your votes in the Climate Change case == | |||
| I (and I'm sure other editors) would like explanations of arbitrators' reasoning and votes in several areas of this case. I'm particularly concerned about your Fof 10.1 on William Connolley and BLPs. I've set up a section at the PD talk page here. Politely discussing specific votes and the reasoning for them is the most likely way for most editors to avoid intense frustration. Many editors have put in long hours on this case and would like to know why you're coming to various conclusions about it. -- ] (]) 14:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The reason I opted for the second wording was because I felt there was more to it than just simple edits that everyone would look at and scream "BLP Violation!". Having looked at the evidence and some of the biographies brought to our attention I felt that more than just obvious BLP violations, there was a serious issue with his edits over time focusing too much on particular subjects (undue weight) or eventually skewing the biography in a particular direction. Those more subtle issues are a bit difficult to concretely show with diffs. In any case, if you look at my other votes, that's the reason I supported ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == On BLPs == | |||
| Not that it matters, but it was Carcharoth who brought up the "consider a bio as a whole" point (cf. proposed principle 8). ] (]) 12:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| When in one of your votes on the Climate Change arbitration you referred to "the idea that you shouldn't edit a biography unless you're prepared to consider the article as a whole rather than simply inserting a tidbit of information", I think you mean | |||
| by Carcharoth, which I'm thinking of mentioning on ] in case it might be useful in clarifying the policy's wording. --] 16:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you both; that's exactly what I was looking for. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Climate Change discretionary sanctions vote looks odd == | |||
| In your oppose vote to proposed remedy 1 "Discretionary sanctions", in the Climate Change arbitration proposed decision, you say "This or 1.1 is acceptable." | |||
| The comment in support of remedies 1 and 1.1 doesn't seem to be consistent with your opposition vote to proposed remedy 1 and I suspect you made a mistake (or else are undecided). Would you please revisit that and see if it says what you want it to say? --] 17:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh thank you! I had an edit conflict with Kirill while writing up my comments and pasted that one back in the wrong place. Good catch :) ] <sup>]</sup> 04:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Was written by me on the suggestion of Ronnotel. (You appear to refer to this on the interminable CC page) ] (]) 21:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you much - I knew someone had talked about writing an essay :) Exactly what I was looking for. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 6 September 2010 == | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/{{#switch: 1 | |||
| | 1 = 2010-09-06 | |||
| | 2 = Volume 6, Issue 36 | |||
| | 3 = 2010-08-30 | |||
| | 4 = 2010-09-13 | |||
| }}}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 23:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)</div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0069 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| RE: ]. Do you remember this user? --] (]) 04:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes. I've recently him over his edits to Chiropractic. If things are continuing, ] might be appropriate. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:55, 18 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Shell Kinney has not edited Misplaced Pages since 23 September 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
pass-out teh baked goodies Gold Hat (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! Is your revert possibly overbroad? You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. User_talk:Geofferybard#Mothers_for_Peace:_Throwing_out_the_baby_with_the_bathwater.3F17:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Questions about a deleted turquoise serpentIt seems that an inexperienced editor is trying to ask you a question at Misplaced Pages talk:Uploading images#Newer version of a photograph. HLHJ (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:Desert Rose (Adenium obesum) pic.jpg The file File:Desert Rose (Adenium obesum) pic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
|
|||||||||
gmail.com
_pic.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pic.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pic.jpg){kind=link}