Revision as of 05:21, 29 September 2010 editDr Fil (talk | contribs)1,528 edits Reworded editorial comment, given as fact, to it actually reflecting opinion of some skeptics← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:08, 9 January 2025 edit undoAoi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,921 edits Reverted 1 pending edit by 2A00:23C7:7D82:C301:945E:4398:B38F:B8AD to revision 1263794913 by Mwwv: The subject of the sentence are multiple USAF personnel, so "they" is the correct pronounTags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
(989 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|1980 UFO report in Suffolk, England}} | |||
The '''Rendlesham Forest Incident''' is the name given to a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights and the alleged landing of a craft of unknown origin in ], ], England in late December 1980. Some Ufologists believe it is perhaps the most famous ] event to have happened in Britain, ranking amongst the best-known UFO events worldwide. Along with the ], it has been compared to the ] in the United States, and is sometimes referred to as "Britain's Roswell".<ref>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8202157.stm| title = Minister warned over 'UK Roswell'| accessdate = 2009-07-17| author = BBC | date=2009-08-17}}</ref> | |||
{{pp-pc|small=yes}} | |||
{{EngvarB|date=December 2018}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2015}} | |||
{{Infobox event | |||
| title = Rendlesham Forest incident | |||
| image = RAF Woodbridge East Gate.jpg | |||
| caption = Fence at the site of the former East Gate of RAF Woodbridge, where the incident began in December 1980. The original East Gate was much smaller.<ref name="RidpathPhotos">{{cite web |last1=Ridpath |first1=Ian |title=Rendlesham Forest photo album |url=http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/photos.html |access-date=21 June 2021}}</ref> | |||
| date = 26 December and 28 December 1980 | |||
| time = 03:00 GMT (23:00 EDT) | |||
| place = ], England | |||
| also_known_as = Britain's Roswell | |||
| coordinates = {{coord|52|05|20|N|01|26|57|E|display=inline,title|name=Claimed Rendlesham UFO landing site}} | |||
}} | |||
The '''Rendlesham Forest incident''' was a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights near ] in ], England, in December 1980, which became linked with ] landings. The events occurred just outside ], which was used at the time by the ] (USAF). USAF personnel, including deputy base commander Lieutenant Colonel ], claimed to see things they described as a UFO. | |||
The ] (MoD) denied that the event posed any threat to national security, and stated that it was therefore never investigated as a security matter. Later evidence indicated that there was a substantial MoD file on the subject, which led to claims of a cover-up. Some interpreted this as part of a larger pattern of information suppression concerning the true nature of unidentified flying objects, by both the United States and British governments (see the ]). However, when the file was released in 2001 it turned out to consist mostly of internal correspondence and responses to inquiries from the public. The lack of any in-depth investigation in the publicly released documents was considered by some skeptics as confirmation that the case was never taken seriously by the MoD.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.uk-ufo.org/condign/rendanl2.htm| title = Rendlesham analysis| accessdate = 2007-10-01| author = David Clarke}}</ref> | |||
The occurrence is the most famous of alleged UFO events to have happened in the United Kingdom,<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/10132449/UFO-files-Rendlesham-Forest-incident-remains-Britains-most-tantalising-sighting.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/10132449/UFO-files-Rendlesham-Forest-incident-remains-Britains-most-tantalising-sighting.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=UFO files: Rendlesham Forest incident remains Britain's most tantalising sighting |newspaper=The Telegraph |date=21 June 2013 |access-date=13 July 2013}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and is among the best-known reported UFO events worldwide. It has been compared to the ] in the United States and is sometimes called "Britain's Roswell".<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8202157.stm| title = Minister warned over 'UK Roswell'| access-date = 17 July 2009| date=17 August 2009| work=BBC News}}</ref> | |||
==Location== | |||
] | |||
Rendlesham Forest is owned by the Forestry Commission and consists of about {{convert|5.8|sqmi}} of coniferous plantations, interspersed with broadleaved belts, heathland and wetland areas. It is located in the county of ], about {{convert|8|mi}} east of the town of ]. | |||
The incident occurred in the vicinity of two military bases - ], which is just to the north of the forest, and ] which extends into the forest from the west. At the time, both were being used by the ] and were under the command of wing commander Colonel ]. The base commander was Colonel Ted Conrad, and his deputy was Lieutenant Colonel ]. Halt's memo to the Ministry of Defence on the incident, and his personal involvement in the second night of the sightings, has given the case credibility. | |||
The main events of the incident, including the supposed landing, took place in the forest, almost a mile (1,600 m) to the east of the East Gate of RAF Woodbridge. | |||
] lighthouse, which skeptics identify as the flashing light seen off to the coast by the airmen, is along the same line of sight but {{convert|5|mi}} further east of this location. | |||
All these locations are shown on the adjacent map. Commentators have published more detailed maps of the location<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.roswellproof.com/rendlesham_pictorial.html| title = Rendlesham pictorial| accessdate = 2007-04-28| author = David Rudiak}}</ref> and a modern aerial view of the region can be found on Google Maps.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/mm?t=h&hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=52.090898,1.498089&spn=0.084904,0.166512&z=13&om=1| title = Rendlesham Incident aerial view| accessdate = 2007-10-01| author = Google Maps}}</ref> | |||
==Date== | |||
The UK ] has stated that the event posed no threat to national security, and therefore, it was never investigated as a security matter. Skeptics have explained the sightings as a misinterpretation of a series of nocturnal lights: a ], the ], and bright stars.<ref name="ianridpath3">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham.html| title = The Rendlesham Forest UFO case| access-date = 17 April 2007| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
Retired Sgt. John Burroughs (LE) states that the events took place over three successive nights (pm into am); 24–25, 25–26 and 26–27 December 1980. One of the key pieces of primary evidence—the "Halt memo", described below—suggests that the first sightings were on the 26th, rather than 25th. However, the memo was written almost two weeks after the event and its author later agreed that he had probably made a mistake in his recollection of the dates. This discrepancy in dates has not only confused subsequent researchers but also led to confusion at the time, for example in the MoD's investigation and analysis of contemporaneous radar records. | |||
==Main events |
==Main events== | ||
===26 December=== | ===26 December=== | ||
Around |
Around 03:00 on 26 December 1980 (reported as 27 December by Halt in ]) a security patrol near the east gate of RAF Woodbridge saw lights apparently descending into nearby Rendlesham Forest. These lights have been attributed by astronomers to a piece of ] seen burning up as a ] over southern England at that time.<ref name="ianridpath.com">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1d.html | title = The 3am fireball| access-date = 2015-04-03| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> Servicemen initially thought it was a downed aircraft. According to Halt's memo, upon entering the forest to investigate, they witnessed a glowing object that was metallic in appearance with coloured lights. As they attempted to approach the object, it appeared to move through the trees, and "the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy". One of the servicemen, Sergeant Jim Penniston, later claimed to have encountered a "craft of unknown origin" while in the forest, although there was no publicised mention of this at the time and there is no corroboration from other witnesses.<ref name="Ian Ridpath">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/pennistonnotebook.html | title = Penniston's notebook| access-date = 2007-09-27| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | ||
Shortly after 04:00 local police were called to the scene but reported that the only lights they could see were those from the Orford Ness lighthouse, some miles away on the coast.<ref name="police">{{cite web|url=http://www.suffolk.police.uk/aboutus/yourrighttoinformation/freedomofinformation/publicationscheme/idoc.ashx?docid=cdf0ea85-e6d5-4a75-bcd4-cb5e385eb526&version=-1 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130715010101/http://www.suffolk.police.uk/aboutus/yourrighttoinformation/freedomofinformation/publicationscheme/idoc.ashx?docid%3Dcdf0ea85%2De6d5%2D4a75%2Dbcd4%2Dcb5e385eb526%26version%3D%2D1|title = Unusual Lights Incident Rendlesham |archive-date = 15 July 2013 |publisher = Suffolk Constabulary |url-status=dead |work=suffolk.police.uk}}</ref><ref name="Ridpath">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/police.html| title = The Police evidence| access-date = 3 April 2015| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
Three servicemen were sent out to investigate and came upon a triangular and brightly lit object silently hovering in the woods several feet off the ground. It was a conical metallic object, suspended in a yellow mist, hovering over a clearing in the trees, with a pulsating blue and red circle of light above.{{Citation needed|date=February 2008}} One made detailed notes of its features, touched its "warm" surface, and copied the numerous symbols on its body. The object flew away after their brief encounter. One eyewitness claims to have seen triangular landing gear on the object leaving three impressions in the ground that were visible the next day. | |||
After daybreak on the morning of 26 December, servicemen returned to a small clearing near the eastern edge of the forest and found three small impressions on the ground in a triangular pattern, as well as burn marks and broken branches on nearby trees. At 10:30 the local police were called out again, this time to see the impressions, which they thought could have been made by an animal.<ref name="police"/><ref name="Ridpath"/> ], in her book ''You Can't Tell the People'', published a photograph of the supposed landing site taken on the morning after the first sighting.<ref> (PDF). Ministry of Defence.</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham5.html| title = What were the landing marks?| access-date = 3 April 2015| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
The airmen were allegedly debriefed, threatened and ordered to sign documents that vowed silence; one even claimed to have been forced to sign a document claiming the UFO was a ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2008}} Some reports suggest that they were reportedly ordered to stay quiet, with the warning "bullets are cheap".{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}} Lieutenant Colonel Halt, however, claimed in a 2008 interview for U.S. news channel CNN that to this day he has not been debriefed over the incident.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}} | |||
After daybreak on the morning of 26 December, servicemen returned to the small clearing where the conical object had been seen, and found three small impressions in a triangular pattern, as well as burn marks and broken branches on nearby trees. Plaster casts of the imprints were taken and have been shown in television documentaries. At 10.30 a.m. the local police were called out again, this time to see the impressions on the ground, which they thought could have been made by an animal.<ref name="police"/> | |||
===28 December=== | ===28 December=== | ||
The deputy base commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, visited the site with several servicemen in the early hours of 28 December 1980 (reported as 29 December by Halt). They took radiation readings in the triangle of depressions and in the surrounding area using an AN/PDR-27, a standard U.S. military radiation survey meter. Although they recorded 0.07 milliroentgens per hour, in other regions they detected 0.03 to 0.04 milliroentgens per hour, around the background level. Furthermore, they detected a similar small 'burst' over half a mile away from the landing site.<ref name=ianridpath1>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham4.html| title = Were the radiation readings significant?| access-date = 2007-04-17| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref><ref name=timprinty1>{{cite web| url = http://www.astronomyufo.com/UFO/SUNlite2_6.pdf| title = The AN/PDR-27 SUNlite, vol. 2. no. 6 p. 10| access-date = 2017-12-11| first = Tim |last=Printy}}</ref> Halt recorded the events on a micro-cassette recorder (see ]). | |||
The servicemen returned to the site again in the early hours of 28 December 1980 with radiation detectors, although the significance of the readings they obtained is disputed.<ref name=ianridpath1>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham4.htm| title = Were the radiation readings significant?| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> The deputy base commander Lt Col ] investigated this sighting personally and recorded the events on a micro-cassette recorder (see "The Halt Tape", below). The site investigated by Halt was near the eastern edge of the forest, at approximately .<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham5b.htm| title = Where was the "landing site"?| accessdate = 2008-08-10}}</ref> | |||
It was during this investigation that a flashing light was seen across the field to the east, almost in line with a farmhouse.<ref name=ianridpath2>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2. |
It was during this investigation that a flashing red light was seen across the field to the east, almost in line with a farmhouse, as the witnesses had seen on the first night. The Orford Ness lighthouse is visible further to the east in the same line of sight.<ref name=ianridpath2>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2.html| title = The flashing light| access-date = 2007-10-01| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | ||
Later, |
Later, according to Halt's memo, three star-like lights were seen in the sky, two to the north and one to the south, about 10 degrees above the horizon. Halt said that the brightest of these hovered for two to three hours and seemed to beam down a stream of light from time to time. Astronomers have explained these star-like lights as bright stars.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham3.html| title = The other lights| access-date = 1 October 2007| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | ||
==Location== | |||
There are claims that the incident was videoed by the USAF; but, if so, the resulting tape has not been made public. | |||
{{Refimprove section|date=December 2021}} | |||
] | |||
] is owned by the ] and consists of about {{convert|5.8|sqmi}} of coniferous plantations, interspersed with broadleaved belts, heathland and wetland areas. It is located in the county of ], about {{convert|8|mi}} east of the town of ]. | |||
The incident occurred in the vicinity of two former military bases: ], which is just to the north of the forest, and ] which extends into the forest from the west and is bounded by the forest on its northern and eastern edges. At the time, both were being used by the ] and were under the command of wing commander Colonel ]. The base commander was ] Ted Conrad, and his deputy was ] Charles I. Halt. | |||
] | |||
The main events of the incident, including the supposed landing or landings, took place in the forest, which starts at the east end of the base runway or about 0.3 miles (0.5 km) to the east of the East Gate of RAF Woodbridge, from where security guards first noticed mysterious lights appearing to descend into the forest. The forest extends east about one mile (1.6 km) beyond East Gate, ending at a farmer's field at Capel Green, where additional events allegedly took place. | |||
], which sceptics identify as the flashing light seen off to the coast by the airmen, is along the same line of sight about {{convert|5|mi}} further east of the forest's edge. At that time it was one of the brightest lighthouses in the UK.<ref name="ianridpath2"/> | |||
<!-- Editors please note that "scepticism" is the correct spelling in British English (which is the variant of English used throughout this article) --> | |||
==Primary and secondary sources== | ==Primary and secondary sources== | ||
The first public report of the incident was published in the ] newspaper '']'', on 2 October 1983, beneath the sensational headline ''UFO lands in Suffolk – and that's official''. The story was based on an account by a former US airman, using the pseudonym Art Wallace (supposedly to protect himself against retribution from the USAF), although his real name was ]. | |||
===The Halt memo=== | ===The Halt memo=== | ||
] | ] | ||
The first piece of primary evidence to be made available to the public was a memorandum written by the deputy base commander, |
The first piece of primary evidence to be made available to the public was a memorandum written by the deputy base commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt, to the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Known as the "Halt memo", this was made publicly available in the United States under the ] in 1983.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/appendix.html| title = The Halt memo| access-date = 2 April 2015| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> The memorandum was dated "13 Jan 1981" under the title "Unexplained Lights". The two-week delay between the incident and the report might account for errors in the dates and times given. The memo was not classified in any way.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.uk-ufo.org/condign/rendanl7.htm|title = Rendlesham: Analysis 17| access-date = 18 July 2008| first = David |last=Clarke |publisher=UK-UFO.org}}</ref> | ||
], a consultant to the National Archives, has investigated the background of this memo and the reaction to it at the MoD. His interviews with the personnel involved confirmed the cursory nature of the investigation made by the MoD, and failed to find any evidence for any other reports on the incident made by the USAF or UK apart from the Halt memo.<ref name=clarkeblog>{{cite web| url = http://drdavidclarke.blogspot.com/p/rendlesham-files.html|title = The Rendlesham Files| access-date = 2 September 2010| first = David |last=Clarke |publisher=David Clarke blog}}</ref> Halt has since gone on record as saying he believes that he witnessed an extraterrestrial event that was then covered up.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUS166901+15-Sep-2010+PRN20100915 |title=U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects |work=Reuters |author= |date=September 15, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110127022656/http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS166901+15-Sep-2010+PRN20100915 |archive-date=2011-01-27 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnmlU69yJWY |title=UFOs Tampering With Nukes: National Press Club @ Washington D.C. |work=National Press Club |via=YouTube |author= |date=September 15, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713145651/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnmlU69yJWY |archive-date=2022-07-13 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Dr David Clarke has investigated the background to this memo and the reaction to it at the MInistry of Defence. <ref>{{cite web| url = http://drdavidclarke.blogspot.com/p/rendlesham-files.html|title = The Rendlesham Files| accessdate = 2010-09-02| author = David Clarke}}</ref> His interviews with the personnel involved confirmed the cursory nature of the investigation made by the MoD, and failed find any evidence for any other reports on the incident made by the USAF or UK apart from the Halt memo. | |||
===Statements from eyewitnesses on 26 December=== | |||
The Scottish researcher James Easton succeeded in obtaining the original witness statements made for Col. Halt by Fred A. Buran, 81st Security Police Squadron, Airman First Class John Burroughs, 81st LE, Airman Edward N. Cabansag, 81st Security Police Squadron, Master-Sergeant J. D. Chandler, 81st Security Police Squadron and Staff-Sergeant Jim Penniston, 81st Security Police Squadron. These documents are now in the public domain and scans of them are available on Ian Ridpath's website.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2b.htm | title = Rendlesham Forest UFO – the witness statements| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> | |||
These documents describe the sightings of strange lights. Penniston, for instance, states that a "large yellow glowing light was emitting above the trees. In the center of the lighted area directly in the center ground level, there was a red light blinking on and off 5 to 10 sec intervals. And a blue light that was being for the most part steady." | |||
There were some strange noises, too. Burroughs reported a noise "like a woman was screaming" and also that "you could hear the farm animals making a lot of noises". Halt heard the same noises two nights later. In a CNN interview in January 2008 he said: "The livestock around the barn seemed to be going crazy". Such noise could also have been made by Muntjac deer in the forest, which are known for their loud, shrill bark when alarmed.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bds.org.uk/muntjac.html| title = Muntjac deer| accessdate = 2007-12-10| author = British Deer Society}}</ref> Burroughs' statement also states that "We could see a beacon going around so we went towards it. We followed it for about two miles before we could it was coming from a light house." | |||
Penniston's statement is the only one that positively identifies a mechanical object as the source of the lights. He states that he was within {{convert|160|ft|-1}} of the object and "it was defidently mechaniclal{{sic}} in nature". Penniston has shown on television a notebook in which he claims to have made real-time notes and sketches of the object. The notebook is headed with the date 27 December and the time 12:20 (00:20 GMT), which does not accord with the date and time given by the other witnesses for the encounter.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2b.htm | title = Penniston's notebook| accessdate = 2007-09-27| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> In addition, Penniston claims that he saw the object at a different landing site from the one investigated by Halt, much closer to RAF Woodbridge. | |||
The witnesses were unnerved by their experience and believed that they had witnessed something, as Buran expresses it, "out of the realm of explanation". | |||
===The Halt Tape=== | ===The Halt Tape=== | ||
] | |||
Also, in 1984, a copy of what became known as the "Halt Tape" fell into the hands of researchers. Unfortunately, because of static and the fact that the tape had been dubbed on an old machine, much of its background conversations could not be discerned. The US ] acquired the original recording, which documents Halt and his patrol investigating a UFO sighting in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980. This tape not only reveals much more of the background conversations but features names that could not be heard on the poor-quality 1984 dub. The tape has also been transcribed by researcher ], who includes a link to an audio download.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/halttape.htm| title = Transcript of Col. Halt’s tape| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> | |||
In 1984, a copy of what became known as the "Halt Tape" was released to UFO researchers by Colonel Sam Morgan, who had by then succeeded Ted Conrad as Halt's superior. This tape chronicles Halt's investigation in the forest in real time, including taking radiation readings, the sighting of the flashing light between trees, and the starlike objects that hovered and twinkled. The tape has been transcribed by researcher ], who includes a link to an audio download<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/halttape.html| title = Transcript of Col. Halt's tape| access-date = 17 April 2007| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> and also a step-by-step analysis of the entire contents of the tape.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/halttape-analysis1.html| title = Transcript of Col. Halt's tape| access-date = 3 April 2015| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
===Statements from eyewitnesses on 26 December=== | |||
===The Halt Affidavit=== | |||
In 1997, Scottish researcher James Easton obtained the original witness statements made by those involved in the first night's sightings.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2b.html | title = Rendlesham Forest UFO – the witness statements| access-date = 2007-04-17| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> One of the witnesses, Ed Cabansag, said in his statement: "We figured the lights were coming from past the forest since nothing was visible when we passed through the woody forest. We would see a glowing near the beacon light, but as we got closer we found it to be a lit-up farmhouse. We got to a vantage point where we could determine that what we were chasing was only a beacon light off in the distance." Another participant, John Burroughs, also stated: "We could see a beacon going around so we went towards it. We followed it for about two miles before we could it was coming from a lighthouse."<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2c.html#cabansag | title = Rendlesham Forest UFO – The witness statements 2| access-date = 2021-12-22| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
In June 2010, retired Colonel Charles Halt signed a notarized affidavit, in which he again summarized what had happened, then stated he believed the event to be extraterrestrial and it had been covered up by both the U.S. and U.K.: | |||
Burroughs reported a noise "like a woman was screaming" and also that "you could hear the farm animals making a lot of noises." Halt heard the same noises two nights later. Such noise could have been made by ] in the forest, which are known for their loud, shrill bark when alarmed.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bds.org.uk/muntjac.html| title = Muntjac deer| access-date = 2007-12-10| work=bds.org| publisher = British Deer Society}}</ref> | |||
:"I believe the objects that I saw at close quarter were extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and the United Kingdom have attempted—both then and now—to subvert the significance of what occurred at Rendlesham Forest and RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practiced methods of disinformation." | |||
===The Halt affidavit=== | |||
Halt also dismissed claims of skeptics that he and his men had confused a UFO with a lighthouse beam: | |||
In June 2010, retired Colonel Charles Halt signed a notarised affidavit, in which he again summarised what had happened, then stated he believed the event to be extraterrestrial and it had been covered up by both the UK and US. Contradictions between this affidavit and the facts as recorded at the time in Halt's memo and tape recording have been pointed out by skeptics.<ref>. IanRidpath.com. Retrieved on 16 August 2011.</ref> | |||
In 2010, base commander Colonel Ted Conrad provided a statement about the incident to Clarke. Conrad stated that "We saw nothing that resembled Lieutenant Colonel Halt's descriptions either in the sky or on the ground" and that "We had people in position to validate Halt's narrative, but none of them could." In an interview, Conrad criticised Halt for the claims in his affidavit, saying "he should be ashamed and embarrassed by his allegation that his country and Britain both conspired to deceive their citizens over this issue. He knows better." Conrad also disputed the testimony of Sergeant Jim Penniston, who claimed to have touched an alien spacecraft; he said that he interviewed Penniston at the time and he had not mentioned any such occurrence. Conrad also suggested that the entire incident might have been a hoax.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Copping | first = Jasper | title = Rendlesham Incident: US commander speaks for the first time about the 'Suffolk UFO' | newspaper = ] | date = 6 August 2011 | url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/8685868/Rendlesham-Incident-US-commander-speaks-for-the-first-time-about-the-Suffolk-UFO.html }}</ref><ref name=clarkeblog/> | |||
:"While in Rendlesham Forest, our security team observed a light that looked like a large eye, red in color, moving through the trees. After a few minutes this object began dripping something that looked like molten metal. A short while later it broke into several smaller, white-colored objects which flew away in all directions. Claims by skeptics that this was merely a sweeping beam from a distant lighthouse are unfounded; we could see the unknown light and the lighthouse simultaneously. The latter was 35 to 40-degrees off where all of this was happening." <ref> ; </ref> | |||
===Suffolk police log=== | |||
Contradictions between this affidavit and the facts as recorded at the time in Halt's memo and tape recording have been pointed out. <ref> </ref> | |||
Two officers from the ] were called to the scene on the night of the initial sighting and again the following morning but found nothing unusual. On the night of the initial incident they reported that the only lights visible were from the Orford lighthouse. They attributed the indentations in the ground to animals. The Suffolk Constabulary file on the case was released in 2005 under the UK's Freedom of Information Act and can be accessed on their website.<ref name="police"/> It includes a letter dated 28 July 1999 written by Inspector Mike Topliss who notes that one of the police constables who attended the scene on the first night returned to the site in daylight in case he had missed something. "There was nothing to be seen and he remains unconvinced that the occurrence was genuine," wrote Topliss. "The immediate area was swept by powerful light beams from a landing beacon at RAF Bentwaters and the Orfordness lighthouse. I know from personal experience that at night, in certain weather and cloud conditions, these beams were very pronounced and certainly caused strange visual effects."<ref name="police"/> | |||
=== |
===Ministry of Defence file=== | ||
Evidence of a substantial MoD file on the subject led to claims of a cover-up; some interpreted this as part of a larger pattern of ], by both the United States and British governments. However, when the file was released in 2001 it turned out to consist mostly of internal correspondence and responses to inquiries from the public. The lack of any in-depth investigation in the publicly released documents is consistent with the MoD's earlier statement that they never took the case seriously.<ref>{{cite web| title = Rendlesham analysis| access-date = 1 October 2007| first = David |last=Clarke |publisher=UK-UFO.org |url = http://www.uk-ufo.org/condign/rendanl2.htm}}</ref><ref name=clarkeblog/> Included in the released files is an explanation given by defence minister Lord Trefgarne as to why the MoD did not investigate further.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/trefgarne.html| title = Why did the British government not investigate the Rendlesham Forest UFO case in any depth?| access-date = 1 October 2010| first = Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
] have a record, dated 26 December 1980, of a report from the law Enforcement Desk of RAF Woodbridge, stating that "We have a sighting of some unusual lights in the sky, we have sent some unarmed troops to investigate, we are terming it as a U.F.O. at present". The police investigated this report and the result is recorded as follows: "Air Traffic Control West Drayton checked. No knowledge of aircraft. Reports received of aerial phenomena over southern England during the night. Only lights visible this area was from Orford light house. Search made of area – negative." The "aerial phenomena" probably refers to the re-entry of the Soviet Cosmos 749 satellite's final stage rocket, which was widely seen over southern England on the evening of 25 December.<ref name = "satellite">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham6.htm| title = The Russian rocket re-entry| accessdate = 2007-10-18| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> A letter in the police file notes that one of the PCs returned to the site in daylight in case he had missed something. "There was nothing to be seen and he remains unconvinced that the occurrence was genuine. The immediate area was swept by powerful light beams from a landing beacon at RAF Bentwaters and the Orfordness lighthouse. I know from personal experience that at night, in certain weather and cloud conditions, these beams were very pronounced and certainly caused strange visual effects." A scan of the report is available at Suffolk Constabulary's website.<ref name="police"/> | |||
==Skeptical analysis== | |||
==Other military installation involvement== | |||
] | |||
One proposed theory is that the incident was a hoax. The ] reported that a former U.S. security policeman, Kevin Conde, claimed responsibility for creating strange lights in the forest by driving around in a police vehicle whose lights he had modified. However, there is no evidence that this prank took place on the nights in question.<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/3033428.stm|title = UFO lights were 'a prank'| access-date = 17 April 2007| author = BBC | date=30 June 2003| work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham_ufos.shtml|title = Rendlesham – UFO hoax| access-date = 17 April 2007| publisher = BBC}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham/04.shtml|title = UFO sighted at Rendlesham| access-date = 17 April 2007| publisher = BBC}}</ref> | |||
Other explanations for the incident have included a downed ] spy satellite, but no evidence has been produced to support this.<ref name = "satellite">{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham6.html| title = The Russian rocket re-entry| access-date = 18 October 2007| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
Some researchers have claimed that personnel from ] visited Rendlesham in 1980 after the Rendlesham Forest Incident.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://bentwaters.org/ufo/index.htm|title = Questions in the House of Lords| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = }}</ref> However, no evidence has been presented and there seems to be confusion with other alleged UFO incidents. | |||
The most widely accepted explanation is that the sightings were due to a combination of three main factors.<ref name = Dunning/> The initial sighting at 03.00 on 26 December, when the airmen saw something apparently descending into the forest, coincided with the appearance of a bright fireball over southern England, and such fireballs are a common source of UFO reports.<ref name="ianridpath.com"/> The supposed landing marks were identified by police and foresters as rabbit diggings.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham5.html| title = What were the landing marks?| access-date = 3 April 2015| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> No evidence has emerged to confirm that anything actually came down in the forest. | |||
As a member of Parliament, Admiral ], the former UK Chief of the Defence Staff, asked Her Majesty's Government: "Whether they are aware of any involvement by ] in the investigation of the 1980 Rendlesham Forest Incident ". ] of ] gave the reply that "Special Branch officers may have been aware of the incident but would not have shown any interest unless there was evidence of a potential threat to national security. No such interest appears to have been shown."<ref>Quoted in Georgina Bruni's book '']''</ref> Hill-Norton commented, "Either large numbers of people were hallucinating, and for an American Air Force nuclear base this is extremely dangerous, or what they say happened did happen, and in either of those circumstances there can only be one answer, and that is that it was of extreme defence interest." <ref></ref> | |||
According to the witness statements from 26 December, the flashing light seen from the forest lay in the same direction as the Orfordness Lighthouse. When the eyewitnesses attempted to approach the light they realised it was further off than they thought. One of the witnesses, Ed Cabansag, described it as “a beacon light off in the distance” while another, John Burroughs, said it was “a lighthouse” (see ]). | |||
In 2001 the British Government released its file on the incident to researchers following a request from Dr David Clarke under the Code of Practice for Access to Government Documents, a precursor to the Freedom of Information Act<ref>{{cite web| url = http://bentwaters.org/ufo/govt-file2001-08.htm|title = British Government releases UFO file on Britain's Most Famous UFO Incident| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = }}</ref><ref name="Nick Pope">{{cite web| url = http://www.nickpope.net/rendlesham_files_reviewed.htm|title = The Rendlesham Files Reviewed| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Nick Pope}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.nickpope.net/rendlesham%20the%20unresolved%20mystery.htm|title = Rendlesham – The Unresolved Mystery| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Nick Pope}}</ref>. The Ministry of Defence has since made these documents available online.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOfInformation/PublicationScheme/SearchPublicationScheme/UnidentifiedFlyingObjectsufoRendleshamForestIncident1980.htm|title = Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) Rendlesham Forest Incident 1980| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = }}</ref> However, the United States continues to remain silent despite the ]-sponsored investigation entitled "UFO Invasion at Rendlesham", the ]'s "UFO Files – Britain's Roswell" and ] inquiries. | |||
Timings on Halt's tape recording during his sighting on 28 December indicate that the light he saw, which lay in the same direction as the light seen two nights earlier, flashed every five seconds, which was the flash rate of the Orfordness Lighthouse.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2a.html| title = The flashing light| access-date = 2007-10-01| first= Ian |last=Ridpath |publisher=IanRidpath.com}}</ref> | |||
==Scepticism==<!-- Editors please note that "scepticism" is the correct spelling in British English (which is the variant of English used throughout this article) --> | |||
Jim Penniston and John Burroughs went to investigate the craft together. In an interview with ] on 9 November 2007, Jim Penniston claimed that he did a 45 minutes full investigation of the craft on the ground, touched the craft and took photos of the craft. However, John Burroughs apparently contradicts this in a separate interview in ''Robert Stack's Unsolved Mysteries''. He states that after suddenly encountering the craft on the ground, "we all hit the ground, and it went up into the trees". The interviews with Jim Penniston and John Burroughs have subsequently been made available on Youtube.<ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
The star-like objects that Halt reported hovering low to the north and south are thought by some sceptics to have been misinterpretations of bright stars distorted by atmospheric and optical effects, another common source of UFO reports. The brightest of them, to the south, matched the position of ], the brightest star in the night sky.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> | |||
Science writer ] investigated the incident in 1983, initially for ]'s ] news programme,<ref></ref> and on 5 January 1985 wrote an article for ''The Guardian'' which did much to discredit the accounts of the UFO sightings at Rendlesham.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1a.htm|title = The article appeared in The Guardian on 1985 January 5 under the heading A Flashlight in the Forest| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> Ridpath asked local forester Vince Thurkettle about the flashing light, and he indicated that it originated from a nearby ], which as seen from the forest edge appears to hover slightly above the ground and would appear to move as the witnesses moved. Also, if a UFO was present, the airmen should have reported a second source of light (the lighthouse) in the same line of sight. In the Halt tape (mentioned above), one can hear an unidentified airman call out "There it is again ... there it is" with an interval of 5 seconds, the same frequency at which the Orford Ness lighthouse flashes.<ref name=ianridpath2/> | |||
Video footage of the lighthouse as seen from Col Halt's vantage point at the edge of the forest shows it flashing at this rate.<ref></ref> | |||
In his 6 January 2009 ] episode titled "The Rendlesham Forest UFO," ] author ] evaluated the original eye-witness reports and audio recordings, as well as the resulting media reporting of this incident. After a lengthy analysis Dunning concluded: | |||
Thurkettle saw the alleged "landing marks", as did the local police, and believed them simply to be old "rabbit diggings" covered with pine needles.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham5.htm| title = The landing marks| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> USAF photographs of the marks discovered by researcher Georgina Bruni were sent to the MoD by Lord Hill-Norton in 2001 and released under the Freedom of Information Act in 2007.<ref></ref> Moreover, the supposed burn marks in the trees were actually axe cuts made by foresters that indicated the trees were ready to be felled. To give further pause to accepting the alleged UFO sighting, a meteor "almost as bright as the full Moon" was spotted over southern England at exactly the time of the initial reports of a bright object "landing" in the forest, according to Dr John Mason, who collects reports of meteor sightings for the British Astronomical Association.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1d.htm| title = The 3 am fireball| accessdate = 2008-05-03| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> | |||
{{quote|text=Col. Halt's thoroughness was commendable, but even he can be mistaken. Without exception, everything he reported on his audiotape and in his written memo has a perfectly rational and unremarkable explanation... All that remains is the tale that the men were debriefed and ordered never to mention the event, and warned that "bullets are cheap". Well, as we've seen on television, the men all talk quite freely about it, and even Col. Halt says that to this day nobody has ever debriefed him. So this appears to be just another dramatic invention for television, perhaps from one of the men who have expanded their stories over the years. | |||
When you examine each piece of evidence separately on its own merit, you avoid the trap of pattern matching and finding correlations where none exist. The meteors had nothing to do with the lighthouse or the rabbit diggings, but when you hear all three stories told together, it's easy to conclude (as did the airmen) that the light overhead became an alien spacecraft in the forest. Always remember: Separate pieces of poor evidence don't aggregate together into a single piece of good evidence.<ref name="Dunning">{{Skeptoid|id=4135|number=135|date=6 January 2009|title=The Rendlesham Forest UFO|access-date=22 June 2017}}</ref>}} | |||
Crucial amongst the evidence is the interpretation of the levels of radiation in the area (clearly heard on the "Halt tape"). Experts at the UK’s National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) have pointed out that the equipment used for this measurement was not intended to measure background radiation and therefore the readings at the low end of the measurement scale are meaningless.<ref name=ianridpath1/> | |||
==UFO Trail== | |||
] proposes an alternative explanation. He agrees with the standard explanation that the incident began with the sighting of a fireball (]) which was interpreted by guards at the base as an aircraft falling in flames in the nearby forest. In fact it would have been hundreds of miles away over the North Sea. Campbell argues that the object subsequently seen by Halt and his men on their nocturnal expedition was the ] ] and that the supposed "spacecraft" were actually bright planets, such as Venus. Campbell is critical of the USAF's abilities with their equipment.<ref>"Throwing light on Rendlesham", ], December 1985 and Ch. 10 ('The Air Force hunts a UFO') of his book "The UFO Mystery Solved", 1994, ISBN 0952151200</ref> | |||
] | |||
In 2005, the Forestry Commission used Lottery proceeds to create a trail in Rendlesham Forest because of public interest and nicknamed it the ''UFO Trail''.<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/4134586.stm |title = New UFO trail follows sightings| access-date = 17 April 2007| author = BBC | date=9 August 2005| work=BBC News}}</ref> In 2014, the Forestry Service commissioned an artist to create a work which has been installed at the end of the trail. The artist states the piece is modelled on sketches that purportedly represent some versions of the UFO claimed to have been seen at Rendlesham.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-29280298 |title=Rendlesham UFO incident: Sculpture to be installed at forest site |work=] |access-date=2016-07-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/EnglandEastAngliaNoForestRendleshamWoodRendleshamForestCentreUFOTrail |title=Rendlesham UFO Trail (England) |website=Forestry.gov.uk |access-date=2016-07-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Hawksley |first=Rupert |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/11415831/Rendlesham-Forest-UFO-incident-truth-conspiracies.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/11415831/Rendlesham-Forest-UFO-incident-truth-conspiracies.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=Britain's Roswell: the truth behind the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident |newspaper=Telegraph |access-date=2016-07-21}}{{cbignore}}</ref> | |||
== Change of heart == | |||
Another theory is that the incident was a hoax. The ] reported that a former US security policeman, ], claimed responsibility for creating strange lights in the forest by driving around in a police vehicle whose lights he had modified.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/3033428.stm|title = UFO lights were 'a prank'| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = BBC | date=2003-06-30}}</ref> | |||
In 2010, Jenny Randles, who first reported the case in the '']'' in 1981 and co-authored with the local researchers who uncovered the events, the first book on the case in 1984, ''Sky Crash: A Cosmic Conspiracy'',<ref>''Sky Crash: A Cosmic Conspiracy'' by Brenda Butler, Dot Street, and Jenny Randles, Neville Spearman, 1984, xii, 283 p. 12 p. of plates, {{ISBN|0-85435-155-8}}.</ref> emphasised her previously expressed doubts that the incident was caused by extraterrestrial visitors. Whilst suggesting that a UAP, an unidentified aerial phenomenon of unknown origin, might have caused parts of the case, she noted: "Whilst some puzzles remain, we can probably say that no unearthly craft were seen in Rendlesham Forest. We can also argue with confidence that the main focus of the events was a series of misperceptions of everyday things encountered in less than everyday circumstances."<ref name="SkeptInq">As quoted by Joe Nickell and James McGaha in , ''Skeptical Inquirer'', vol. 36.3, May/June 2012.</ref><ref>Jenny Randles, Andy Roberts and David Clarke, ''The UFOs That Never Were'', London House, 2000, p. 222.</ref> | |||
<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham_ufos.shtml|title = Rendlesham – UFO hoax| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = BBC}}</ref> | |||
<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham/04.shtml|title = UFO sighted at Rendlesham| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = BBC}}</ref> | |||
Conde has since withdrawn the claim that he was responsible for the incident. "It is my impression that I pulled my stunt during an exercise. We would not have had an exercise during the Christmas holiday . That is a strong indication that my stunt is not the source of this specific incident".<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham7.htm|title = Was the Rendlesham Forest UFO sighting due to a prank that got out of hand?| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> However, it remains possible that the coloured lights seen in the forest on the first night of the incident were due to a hoax by a perpetrator who has never come forward. | |||
==Possible hoax== | |||
Other explanations for the incident have included a downed ] spy satellite<ref name = "satellite"/> or a ] incident. | |||
In December 2018, ], a British UFO researcher, reported a claim that the incident was a set-up by the ] as a revenge plot on the USAF. According to this story, in August 1980, the SAS parachuted into RAF Woodbridge to test the security at the nuclear site. The USAF had recently upgraded their radar and detected the black parachutes of the SAS men as they descended to the base. The SAS troops were interrogated and beaten up, with the ultimate insult that they were called "unidentified aliens". To enact their revenge, the SAS "gave" the USAF their own version of an alien event; "....as December approached, lights and coloured flares were rigged in the woods. Black helium balloons were also coupled to remote-controlled kites to carry suspended materials into the sky, activated by radio-controls."<ref>{{cite news |title=Historic British UFO mystery was 'prank played on US air force by SAS' |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/12/30/historic-british-ufo-mystery-prank-played-us-air-force-sas/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/12/30/historic-british-ufo-mystery-prank-played-us-air-force-sas/ |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=30 December 2018 |work=The Telegraph |date=30 December 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> However, Clarke's investigation concluded that the story was itself a hoax.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://drdavidclarke.co.uk/2018/12/27/who-dares-wins-britains-roswell-meets-the-sas/|title=Who Dares Wins?: Britain's Roswell meets the SAS|first=Dr David|last=Clarke|date=27 December 2018}}</ref> | |||
==Researchers and commentators== | |||
Some of the first people to examine the event in detail were the British Ufologist ] in her book "Sky Crash", and ] in his books "Cosmic Crashes" and "A Covert Agenda". | |||
] has researched the subject and in her book ] publishes a photograph of the supposed landing site taken on the morning after the first sighting.<ref></ref> The late ], (] and former ] of the UK) also believed that a UFO landed at Rendlesham and repeatedly questioned the UK Government on the issue.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://bentwaters.org/ufo/index.htm|title = Questions in the House of Lords| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Georgina Bruni}}</ref><ref></ref> | |||
] who was the source of the original ''News of the World'' article has written extensively on the subject and is a firm believer in an extraterrestrial explanation. Warren was certainly a USAF airman at the Woodbridge base, but his own claims that he was a witness to the incident are disputed by others, notably by Col. Halt. | |||
Bruni and Warren do not, however, agree on the details and have clashed publicly over the supposed inaccuracies of their respective accounts.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://twinbases.org.uk//ufo/georginalarry.htm|title = Confrontation, initiated by Larry Warren| accessdate = 2008-05-03| author = Georgina Bruni}}</ref> | |||
Prominent amongst the sceptics is Ian Ridpath (mentioned above). Much of his research is available on his website,<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham.htm| title = The Rendlesham Forest UFO case| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Ian Ridpath}}</ref> which also includes much of the raw evidence, including the original eyewitness statements. | |||
], who originally brought the case to prominence, wrote an extensive article in her book with ] and ], (The UFOs That Never Were) entitled "Rendle Shame Forest" where she came to the conclusion that "While some puzzles remain, we can probably say that no unearthly craft were seen in Rendlesham Forest. We can also argue with confidence that the main focus of the events was a series of misperceptions of everyday things encountered in less than everyday circumstances." | |||
One of the most prominent believers in the extraterrestrial origin of the Rendlesham UFOs is ] who worked for the MoD, researching and investigating UFO phenomena between 1991 and 1994. He discussed the Rendlesham Forest Incident in his various books and in his articles: "Selected Documents",<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.nickpope.net/Selected_Documents.htm|title = Selected Documents| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Nick Pope}}</ref> which relates to the MoD documents on the Rendlesham Forest incident, "Rendlesham – The Unresolved Mystery",<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.nickpope.net/rendlesham%20the%20unresolved%20mystery.htm |title = Rendlesham – The Unresolved Mystery| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Nick Pope}}</ref> "The Rendlesham Files Reviewed"<ref name="Nick Pope"/> (a detailed commentary and analysis of the MoD documents) and "Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident".<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.nickpope.net/latest_news.htm |title = Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Nick Pope}}</ref> He has gone on record as saying that "the Rendlesham Forest Incident is bigger than Roswell" (quoted on Sci Fi Channel – see TV documentaries below). | |||
Additionally, Lieutenant Colonel (later Colonel) ], the former Deputy Base Commander of USAF Bentwaters and Woodbridge, who was a major witness to these events, is also a firm believer and contributor to books and documentaries. As stated in his ], Halt believes he witnessed an extraterrestrial event that was then covered up. Halt was also a speaker at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on September 27, 2010, one of half a dozen former Air Force officers testifying on the subject of "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects."<ref></ref> | |||
==Rendlesham Forest today== | |||
] | |||
Today, the forest looks quite different: the ] (winds equivalent to a category 3 ]) caused extensive destruction of trees, and the ] undertook a massive replanting programme in its aftermath. However, some of the locations associated with the supposed incident are still identifiable and the Forestry Commission have marked a trail (the ''UFO Trail'') for walkers, which includes the principal locations such as the small clearing where the object allegedly landed.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/4134586.stm |title = New UFO trail follows sightings| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = BBC | date=2005-08-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/4562298.stm |title = UFO enthusiasts gather in forest| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = BBC | date=2005-12-27}}</ref> | |||
At the start of the UFO trail, there is a large triangular shaped metal information board. It features a map of the forest, clearly marking the UFO trail and gives a basic account of what happened in 1980, although with an erroneous date for the initial sighting: | |||
"In December 1980 several sightings of UFOs were reported in Rendlesham Forest. Many think these mysterious events are the most significant UFO incident to have occurred in the UK. | |||
"During the evening of 26 December a resident of Sudbourne, a village approximately 6 miles (10 km) to the North East of Rendlesham Forest, reported a mysterious shape (like an upturned mushroom) in the sky above his garden. | |||
Later that night two USAF patrolmen at the East Gate of RAF Woodbridge spotted unusual lights in the forest, and were given permission to investigate. What they reported was very strange. | |||
"This was the time of the 'Cold War' and because of the sensitive military situation at the time, the incident was officially reported to the Military Authorities by the Deputy Base Commander Lt. Colonel Charles Halt, USAF. | |||
"There is, of course, no tangible evidence of a UFO on the ground – no debris was found apart from some broken tree top branches. We can, however, piece together, from transcripts and recordings which were taken at the time, an intriguing picture."<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.rendlesham-incident.co.uk/gallery/index.php|title = Rendlesham-Incident Photo Gallery| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = }}</ref> | |||
==Official government sources== | |||
*MoD Documents covering the UFO incident at Rendlesham Forest in 1980 were first released in May 2001 to ] of Sheffield University who had requested them under the Code of Practice for Access to Government Information (which preceded the UK's Freedom of Information Act). Dr Clarke discusses them on his website<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.uk-ufo.org/condign/rendsec.htm|title = The Secret Files: Rendlesham| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = Dr David Clarke}}</ref> In 2008 the files were transferred from MoD to The National Archives (TNA) and removed from the MoD website. | |||
*As of August 2009, all documents relating to the incident are available on the National Archives UFO section<ref>{{cite web| url = http://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/|title = National Archives UFO Files| accessdate = 2009-07-17| author = }}</ref> under reference ''DEFE 24/1948''. These documents include the request above, along with details of the Ombudsman judgment which followed. For the next few months, access to this file, and other files released on the same date will be free to view and download. | |||
*The Halt Memo<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/appendix.htm|title = The Halt memo| accessdate = 2007-04-17| author = }}</ref> | |||
==TV documentaries== | |||
* Lifetime Television's ''Unsolved Mysteries: "Bentwaters UFO"'' – First broadcast in the US on 18 September 1991. | |||
* London Weekend Television's ''Strange But True?'' – First broadcast in the UK on 1994 December 9. | |||
* BBC3's ''Britain's Closest Encounter'' – First broadcast in the UK on 2003 March 15. | |||
* SciFi Channel's ''UFO Invasion at Rendlesham'' – First broadcast in the US on 12 December 2003 and in the UK on 1 December 2005. | |||
* ''British UFO Files'' – First broadcast on ] in 2004. | |||
* National Geographic Channel's ''Naked Science: "Close Encounters"'' – First broadcast in the US on 17 December 2005. | |||
* History Channel's ''UFO Files: "Britain's Roswell"'' – First broadcast in the US on 17 December 2005 and in the UK 22 January 2006. | |||
* History Channel's ''UFO Hunters'' – First aired 27 February 2008. | |||
* History Channel's "I know What I Saw" First aired December 2009 | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
* '']'', a 2014 film based on these events | |||
*] | |||
* The Rendlesham Forest incident is incorporated into ]'s 2019 adaptation of ]'s '']'', where the event is dramatised in the second episode. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} | ||
* {{cite journal |url=https://britastro.org/sites/default/files/H.G.%20Miles.pdf |title=Howard George Miles (1922–2016) |journal=British Astronomical Association Journal |date=December 2017 |volume=27 |issue=6 |page=372 – top right paragraph reference to '''''Cosmos 749R''''' re-entry }} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{commons category}} | |||
* – An up-to-date information repository, containing articles, evidence and media related to the case. | |||
* at 28:25 minutes and 32:15 minutes he talks about Rendlesham. | |||
* – A sceptical view, with explanations for all the main aspects of the case. | |||
* {{Skeptoid|id=4135|number=135|date=6 January 2009|title=The Rendlesham Forest UFO|access-date=22 June 2017}} Explains the Rendlesham incident in rational terms. | |||
* | |||
* Robert Sheaffer's sceptical assessment of the case. | |||
* | |||
* at 28:25 minutes and 32:15 minutes he talks about Rendlesham. | |||
* attempts to categorically debunk the Rendlesham incident. | |||
{{UFOs}} | {{UFOs}} | ||
{{Conspiracy theories}} | |||
{{Suffolk Coastal}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 09:08, 9 January 2025
1980 UFO report in Suffolk, England
Fence at the site of the former East Gate of RAF Woodbridge, where the incident began in December 1980. The original East Gate was much smaller. | |
Date | 26 December and 28 December 1980 |
---|---|
Time | 03:00 GMT (23:00 EDT) |
Location | Suffolk, England |
Coordinates | 52°05′20″N 01°26′57″E / 52.08889°N 1.44917°E / 52.08889; 1.44917 (Claimed Rendlesham UFO landing site) |
Also known as | Britain's Roswell |
The Rendlesham Forest incident was a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights near Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England, in December 1980, which became linked with UFO landings. The events occurred just outside RAF Woodbridge, which was used at the time by the United States Air Force (USAF). USAF personnel, including deputy base commander Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt, claimed to see things they described as a UFO.
The occurrence is the most famous of alleged UFO events to have happened in the United Kingdom, and is among the best-known reported UFO events worldwide. It has been compared to the Roswell UFO incident in the United States and is sometimes called "Britain's Roswell".
The UK Ministry of Defence has stated that the event posed no threat to national security, and therefore, it was never investigated as a security matter. Skeptics have explained the sightings as a misinterpretation of a series of nocturnal lights: a fireball, the Orfordness Lighthouse, and bright stars.
Main events
26 December
Around 03:00 on 26 December 1980 (reported as 27 December by Halt in his memo to the UK Ministry of Defence) a security patrol near the east gate of RAF Woodbridge saw lights apparently descending into nearby Rendlesham Forest. These lights have been attributed by astronomers to a piece of natural debris seen burning up as a fireball (meteor) over southern England at that time. Servicemen initially thought it was a downed aircraft. According to Halt's memo, upon entering the forest to investigate, they witnessed a glowing object that was metallic in appearance with coloured lights. As they attempted to approach the object, it appeared to move through the trees, and "the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy". One of the servicemen, Sergeant Jim Penniston, later claimed to have encountered a "craft of unknown origin" while in the forest, although there was no publicised mention of this at the time and there is no corroboration from other witnesses.
Shortly after 04:00 local police were called to the scene but reported that the only lights they could see were those from the Orford Ness lighthouse, some miles away on the coast.
After daybreak on the morning of 26 December, servicemen returned to a small clearing near the eastern edge of the forest and found three small impressions on the ground in a triangular pattern, as well as burn marks and broken branches on nearby trees. At 10:30 the local police were called out again, this time to see the impressions, which they thought could have been made by an animal. Georgina Bruni, in her book You Can't Tell the People, published a photograph of the supposed landing site taken on the morning after the first sighting.
28 December
The deputy base commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, visited the site with several servicemen in the early hours of 28 December 1980 (reported as 29 December by Halt). They took radiation readings in the triangle of depressions and in the surrounding area using an AN/PDR-27, a standard U.S. military radiation survey meter. Although they recorded 0.07 milliroentgens per hour, in other regions they detected 0.03 to 0.04 milliroentgens per hour, around the background level. Furthermore, they detected a similar small 'burst' over half a mile away from the landing site. Halt recorded the events on a micro-cassette recorder (see § The Halt Tape).
It was during this investigation that a flashing red light was seen across the field to the east, almost in line with a farmhouse, as the witnesses had seen on the first night. The Orford Ness lighthouse is visible further to the east in the same line of sight.
Later, according to Halt's memo, three star-like lights were seen in the sky, two to the north and one to the south, about 10 degrees above the horizon. Halt said that the brightest of these hovered for two to three hours and seemed to beam down a stream of light from time to time. Astronomers have explained these star-like lights as bright stars.
Location
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Rendlesham Forest is owned by the Forestry Commission and consists of about 5.8 square miles (15 km) of coniferous plantations, interspersed with broadleaved belts, heathland and wetland areas. It is located in the county of Suffolk, about 8 miles (13 km) east of the town of Ipswich. The incident occurred in the vicinity of two former military bases: RAF Bentwaters, which is just to the north of the forest, and RAF Woodbridge which extends into the forest from the west and is bounded by the forest on its northern and eastern edges. At the time, both were being used by the United States Air Force and were under the command of wing commander Colonel Gordon E. Williams. The base commander was Colonel Ted Conrad, and his deputy was Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt.
The main events of the incident, including the supposed landing or landings, took place in the forest, which starts at the east end of the base runway or about 0.3 miles (0.5 km) to the east of the East Gate of RAF Woodbridge, from where security guards first noticed mysterious lights appearing to descend into the forest. The forest extends east about one mile (1.6 km) beyond East Gate, ending at a farmer's field at Capel Green, where additional events allegedly took place.
Orfordness Lighthouse, which sceptics identify as the flashing light seen off to the coast by the airmen, is along the same line of sight about 5 miles (8.0 km) further east of the forest's edge. At that time it was one of the brightest lighthouses in the UK.
Primary and secondary sources
The Halt memo
The first piece of primary evidence to be made available to the public was a memorandum written by the deputy base commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt, to the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Known as the "Halt memo", this was made publicly available in the United States under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act in 1983. The memorandum was dated "13 Jan 1981" under the title "Unexplained Lights". The two-week delay between the incident and the report might account for errors in the dates and times given. The memo was not classified in any way. David Clarke, a consultant to the National Archives, has investigated the background of this memo and the reaction to it at the MoD. His interviews with the personnel involved confirmed the cursory nature of the investigation made by the MoD, and failed to find any evidence for any other reports on the incident made by the USAF or UK apart from the Halt memo. Halt has since gone on record as saying he believes that he witnessed an extraterrestrial event that was then covered up.
The Halt Tape
In 1984, a copy of what became known as the "Halt Tape" was released to UFO researchers by Colonel Sam Morgan, who had by then succeeded Ted Conrad as Halt's superior. This tape chronicles Halt's investigation in the forest in real time, including taking radiation readings, the sighting of the flashing light between trees, and the starlike objects that hovered and twinkled. The tape has been transcribed by researcher Ian Ridpath, who includes a link to an audio download and also a step-by-step analysis of the entire contents of the tape.
Statements from eyewitnesses on 26 December
In 1997, Scottish researcher James Easton obtained the original witness statements made by those involved in the first night's sightings. One of the witnesses, Ed Cabansag, said in his statement: "We figured the lights were coming from past the forest since nothing was visible when we passed through the woody forest. We would see a glowing near the beacon light, but as we got closer we found it to be a lit-up farmhouse. We got to a vantage point where we could determine that what we were chasing was only a beacon light off in the distance." Another participant, John Burroughs, also stated: "We could see a beacon going around so we went towards it. We followed it for about two miles before we could it was coming from a lighthouse."
Burroughs reported a noise "like a woman was screaming" and also that "you could hear the farm animals making a lot of noises." Halt heard the same noises two nights later. Such noise could have been made by Muntjac deer in the forest, which are known for their loud, shrill bark when alarmed.
The Halt affidavit
In June 2010, retired Colonel Charles Halt signed a notarised affidavit, in which he again summarised what had happened, then stated he believed the event to be extraterrestrial and it had been covered up by both the UK and US. Contradictions between this affidavit and the facts as recorded at the time in Halt's memo and tape recording have been pointed out by skeptics.
In 2010, base commander Colonel Ted Conrad provided a statement about the incident to Clarke. Conrad stated that "We saw nothing that resembled Lieutenant Colonel Halt's descriptions either in the sky or on the ground" and that "We had people in position to validate Halt's narrative, but none of them could." In an interview, Conrad criticised Halt for the claims in his affidavit, saying "he should be ashamed and embarrassed by his allegation that his country and Britain both conspired to deceive their citizens over this issue. He knows better." Conrad also disputed the testimony of Sergeant Jim Penniston, who claimed to have touched an alien spacecraft; he said that he interviewed Penniston at the time and he had not mentioned any such occurrence. Conrad also suggested that the entire incident might have been a hoax.
Suffolk police log
Two officers from the Suffolk Constabulary were called to the scene on the night of the initial sighting and again the following morning but found nothing unusual. On the night of the initial incident they reported that the only lights visible were from the Orford lighthouse. They attributed the indentations in the ground to animals. The Suffolk Constabulary file on the case was released in 2005 under the UK's Freedom of Information Act and can be accessed on their website. It includes a letter dated 28 July 1999 written by Inspector Mike Topliss who notes that one of the police constables who attended the scene on the first night returned to the site in daylight in case he had missed something. "There was nothing to be seen and he remains unconvinced that the occurrence was genuine," wrote Topliss. "The immediate area was swept by powerful light beams from a landing beacon at RAF Bentwaters and the Orfordness lighthouse. I know from personal experience that at night, in certain weather and cloud conditions, these beams were very pronounced and certainly caused strange visual effects."
Ministry of Defence file
Evidence of a substantial MoD file on the subject led to claims of a cover-up; some interpreted this as part of a larger pattern of information suppression concerning the true nature of unidentified flying objects, by both the United States and British governments. However, when the file was released in 2001 it turned out to consist mostly of internal correspondence and responses to inquiries from the public. The lack of any in-depth investigation in the publicly released documents is consistent with the MoD's earlier statement that they never took the case seriously. Included in the released files is an explanation given by defence minister Lord Trefgarne as to why the MoD did not investigate further.
Skeptical analysis
One proposed theory is that the incident was a hoax. The BBC reported that a former U.S. security policeman, Kevin Conde, claimed responsibility for creating strange lights in the forest by driving around in a police vehicle whose lights he had modified. However, there is no evidence that this prank took place on the nights in question.
Other explanations for the incident have included a downed Soviet spy satellite, but no evidence has been produced to support this.
The most widely accepted explanation is that the sightings were due to a combination of three main factors. The initial sighting at 03.00 on 26 December, when the airmen saw something apparently descending into the forest, coincided with the appearance of a bright fireball over southern England, and such fireballs are a common source of UFO reports. The supposed landing marks were identified by police and foresters as rabbit diggings. No evidence has emerged to confirm that anything actually came down in the forest.
According to the witness statements from 26 December, the flashing light seen from the forest lay in the same direction as the Orfordness Lighthouse. When the eyewitnesses attempted to approach the light they realised it was further off than they thought. One of the witnesses, Ed Cabansag, described it as “a beacon light off in the distance” while another, John Burroughs, said it was “a lighthouse” (see Statements from eyewitnesses on 26 December).
Timings on Halt's tape recording during his sighting on 28 December indicate that the light he saw, which lay in the same direction as the light seen two nights earlier, flashed every five seconds, which was the flash rate of the Orfordness Lighthouse.
The star-like objects that Halt reported hovering low to the north and south are thought by some sceptics to have been misinterpretations of bright stars distorted by atmospheric and optical effects, another common source of UFO reports. The brightest of them, to the south, matched the position of Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky.
In his 6 January 2009 Skeptoid podcast episode titled "The Rendlesham Forest UFO," scientific sceptic author Brian Dunning evaluated the original eye-witness reports and audio recordings, as well as the resulting media reporting of this incident. After a lengthy analysis Dunning concluded:
Col. Halt's thoroughness was commendable, but even he can be mistaken. Without exception, everything he reported on his audiotape and in his written memo has a perfectly rational and unremarkable explanation... All that remains is the tale that the men were debriefed and ordered never to mention the event, and warned that "bullets are cheap". Well, as we've seen on television, the men all talk quite freely about it, and even Col. Halt says that to this day nobody has ever debriefed him. So this appears to be just another dramatic invention for television, perhaps from one of the men who have expanded their stories over the years. When you examine each piece of evidence separately on its own merit, you avoid the trap of pattern matching and finding correlations where none exist. The meteors had nothing to do with the lighthouse or the rabbit diggings, but when you hear all three stories told together, it's easy to conclude (as did the airmen) that the light overhead became an alien spacecraft in the forest. Always remember: Separate pieces of poor evidence don't aggregate together into a single piece of good evidence.
UFO Trail
In 2005, the Forestry Commission used Lottery proceeds to create a trail in Rendlesham Forest because of public interest and nicknamed it the UFO Trail. In 2014, the Forestry Service commissioned an artist to create a work which has been installed at the end of the trail. The artist states the piece is modelled on sketches that purportedly represent some versions of the UFO claimed to have been seen at Rendlesham.
Change of heart
In 2010, Jenny Randles, who first reported the case in the London Evening Standard in 1981 and co-authored with the local researchers who uncovered the events, the first book on the case in 1984, Sky Crash: A Cosmic Conspiracy, emphasised her previously expressed doubts that the incident was caused by extraterrestrial visitors. Whilst suggesting that a UAP, an unidentified aerial phenomenon of unknown origin, might have caused parts of the case, she noted: "Whilst some puzzles remain, we can probably say that no unearthly craft were seen in Rendlesham Forest. We can also argue with confidence that the main focus of the events was a series of misperceptions of everyday things encountered in less than everyday circumstances."
Possible hoax
In December 2018, David Clarke, a British UFO researcher, reported a claim that the incident was a set-up by the SAS as a revenge plot on the USAF. According to this story, in August 1980, the SAS parachuted into RAF Woodbridge to test the security at the nuclear site. The USAF had recently upgraded their radar and detected the black parachutes of the SAS men as they descended to the base. The SAS troops were interrogated and beaten up, with the ultimate insult that they were called "unidentified aliens". To enact their revenge, the SAS "gave" the USAF their own version of an alien event; "....as December approached, lights and coloured flares were rigged in the woods. Black helium balloons were also coupled to remote-controlled kites to carry suspended materials into the sky, activated by radio-controls." However, Clarke's investigation concluded that the story was itself a hoax.
See also
- Lakenheath-Bentwaters incident
- UFO conspiracy theory
- Unidentified flying object
- Paulding Light
- List of reported UFO sightings
- UFO sightings in United Kingdom
- The Rendlesham UFO Incident, a 2014 film based on these events
- The Rendlesham Forest incident is incorporated into BBC Radio 4's 2019 adaptation of H. P. Lovecraft's The Whisperer in Darkness, where the event is dramatised in the second episode.
References
- Ridpath, Ian. "Rendlesham Forest photo album". Retrieved 21 June 2021.
- "UFO files: Rendlesham Forest incident remains Britain's most tantalising sighting". The Telegraph. 21 June 2013. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2013.
- "Minister warned over 'UK Roswell'". BBC News. 17 August 2009. Retrieved 17 July 2009.
- Ridpath, Ian. "The Rendlesham Forest UFO case". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- ^ Ridpath, Ian. "The 3am fireball". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Penniston's notebook". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 27 September 2007.
- ^ "Unusual Lights Incident Rendlesham". suffolk.police.uk. Suffolk Constabulary. Archived from the original on 15 July 2013.
- ^ Ridpath, Ian. "The Police evidence". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- "Fax from Parliamentary Branch to DAS(SEC), 4 June 2001 8:50AM" (PDF). Ministry of Defence.
- Ridpath, Ian. "What were the landing marks?". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Were the radiation readings significant?". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- Printy, Tim. "The AN/PDR-27 SUNlite, vol. 2. no. 6 p. 10" (PDF). Retrieved 11 December 2017.
- ^ Ridpath, Ian. "The flashing light". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 1 October 2007.
- ^ Ridpath, Ian. "The other lights". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 1 October 2007.
- Ridpath, Ian. "The Halt memo". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- Clarke, David. "Rendlesham: Analysis 17". UK-UFO.org. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- ^ Clarke, David. "The Rendlesham Files". David Clarke blog. Retrieved 2 September 2010.
- "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects". Reuters. 15 September 2010. Archived from the original on 27 January 2011.
- "UFOs Tampering With Nukes: National Press Club @ Washington D.C." National Press Club. 15 September 2010. Archived from the original on 13 July 2022 – via YouTube.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Transcript of Col. Halt's tape". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Transcript of Col. Halt's tape". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Rendlesham Forest UFO – the witness statements". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Rendlesham Forest UFO – The witness statements 2". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 22 December 2021.
- "Muntjac deer". bds.org. British Deer Society. Retrieved 10 December 2007.
- "Col Halt's affidavit". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved on 16 August 2011.
- Copping, Jasper (6 August 2011). "Rendlesham Incident: US commander speaks for the first time about the 'Suffolk UFO'". The Daily Telegraph.
- Clarke, David. "Rendlesham analysis". UK-UFO.org. Retrieved 1 October 2007.
- Ridpath, Ian. "Why did the British government not investigate the Rendlesham Forest UFO case in any depth?". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
- BBC (30 June 2003). "UFO lights were 'a prank'". BBC News. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- "Rendlesham – UFO hoax". BBC. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- "UFO sighted at Rendlesham". BBC. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- Ridpath, Ian. "The Russian rocket re-entry". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 18 October 2007.
- ^ Dunning, Brian (6 January 2009). "Skeptoid #135: The Rendlesham Forest UFO". Skeptoid. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- Ridpath, Ian. "What were the landing marks?". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Ridpath, Ian. "The flashing light". IanRidpath.com. Retrieved 1 October 2007.
- BBC (9 August 2005). "New UFO trail follows sightings". BBC News. Retrieved 17 April 2007.
- "Rendlesham UFO incident: Sculpture to be installed at forest site". BBC News. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
- "Rendlesham UFO Trail (England)". Forestry.gov.uk. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
- Hawksley, Rupert. "Britain's Roswell: the truth behind the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident". Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
- Sky Crash: A Cosmic Conspiracy by Brenda Butler, Dot Street, and Jenny Randles, Neville Spearman, 1984, xii, 283 p. 12 p. of plates, ISBN 0-85435-155-8.
- As quoted by Joe Nickell and James McGaha in The Roswellian Syndrome: How some UFO Myths Develop, Skeptical Inquirer, vol. 36.3, May/June 2012.
- Jenny Randles, Andy Roberts and David Clarke, The UFOs That Never Were, London House, 2000, p. 222.
- "Historic British UFO mystery was 'prank played on US air force by SAS'". The Telegraph. 30 December 2018. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
- Clarke, Dr David (27 December 2018). "Who Dares Wins?: Britain's Roswell meets the SAS".
- "Howard George Miles (1922–2016)" (PDF). British Astronomical Association Journal. 27 (6): 372 – top right paragraph reference to Cosmos 749R re-entry. December 2017.
External links
- 2005 Nick Pope Interview at 28:25 minutes and 32:15 minutes he talks about Rendlesham.
- Dunning, Brian (6 January 2009). "Skeptoid #135: The Rendlesham Forest UFO". Skeptoid. Retrieved 22 June 2017. Explains the Rendlesham incident in rational terms.
- The Rendle-Sham case Robert Sheaffer's sceptical assessment of the case.
Conspiracy theories | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
List of conspiracy theories | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suffolk Coastal | |
---|---|
Towns | |
Civil parishes |
|
Other settlements | |
|