| Revision as of 06:57, 17 October 2010 editNinetoyadome (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,186 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=?|text=The article does not have any credible sources, it is basically an azeri fairy tale which doesnt have any evidence ...' | Latest revision as of 03:59, 7 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''speedy keep '''(criterion ]). (]) <b>] <small>]</small></b> 09:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} | |||
| :{{la|Western Azerbaijan}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Western Azerbaijan}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | :{{la|Western Azerbaijan}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Western Azerbaijan}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Western Azerbaijan}}) | :({{Find sources|Western Azerbaijan}}) | ||
| The article does not have any credible sources, it is basically an azeri fairy tale which doesnt have any evidence to back up ] (]) 06:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | The article does not have any credible sources, it is basically an azeri fairy tale which doesnt have any evidence to back up ] (]) 06:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep'''. Article is notable, with plenty of sources. Nomination rationale indicates a political bias against the subject.--] (]) 07:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *Appears to be an SPA. Only edits are to Armenia-related articles, so this nomination is clearly flawed and in bad faith. Agree on ''']''' under criterion 2.2. ] (] • ] • ]) 08:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:59, 7 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep (criterion 2.2). (non-admin closure) Stickee (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Western Azerbaijan
- Western Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not have any credible sources, it is basically an azeri fairy tale which doesnt have any evidence to back up Ninetoyadome (talk) 06:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Article is notable, with plenty of sources. Nomination rationale indicates a political bias against the subject.--Hongkongresident (talk) 07:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Appears to be an SPA. Only edits are to Armenia-related articles, so this nomination is clearly flawed and in bad faith. Agree on speedy keep under criterion 2.2. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 08:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.