Misplaced Pages

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:44, 12 February 2006 view sourceDuk (talk | contribs)10,888 edits Australian Participation: removed link that is repeated at the end of the article← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:00, 25 December 2024 view source BilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,800 edits F-35B: Removed unnecessary piping 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American stealth multirole fighter aircraft}}
]
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{Redirect|F35||F35 (disambiguation){{!}}F35 (disambiguation)}}
{{Good article}}
{{Pp-move-indef|small=yes}}
{{Use American English|date=July 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
<!-- This article is a part of ]. Please see ] for recommended layout, and guidelines. -->
{{Infobox aircraft
| name = F-35 Lightning II
| image = F-35A flight (cropped).jpg
| image_caption = ] F-35A in flight over the coast of Florida
| alt =
| aircraft_type = ] ]
| national_origin = United States
| manufacturer = ]<!-- Field is only for prime contractors/major manufacturers, not subcontractors/suppliers. -->
| first_flight = {{Start date and age|2006|12|15|df=yes}} (F-35A)
| introduction = {{ubl|F-35B: 31 July 2015 (USMC)<ref name="USMC_IOC">{{cite web |last=Drew |first=James |date=31 July 2015 |title=First operational F-35 squadron declared ready for combat |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/first-operational-f-35-squadron-declared-ready-for-combat/117812.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201204204600/https://www.flightglobal.com/first-operational-f-35-squadron-declared-ready-for-combat/117812.article |archive-date=4 December 2020 |work=]}}</ref>|F-35A: 2 August 2016 (USAF)<ref name="defready aug16"/>|F-35C: 28 February 2019 (USN)<ref name=":0" />}} <!-- This template field is for when the aircraft enters operational service. See notes at ] for details. -->
| status = In service
| primary_user = ] (USAF)<!-- List only ONE (1) user. Please DON'T add flag icons, as they limit horizontal space. -->
| more_users = {{ubl|] (USN) |] (USMC)|See ] for others}}<!-- Limit is three (3) users in 'more users' field, four (4) total users. -->
| produced = 2006–present
| number_built = 1,000 {{As of|2024|January|lc=y}}<ref>{{cite web |last1=Finnerty |first1=Ryan |date=19 January 2024 |title=Lockheed completes assembly of 1,000th F-35 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/lockheed-completes-assembly-of-1000th-f-35/156540.article |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118233745/https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/lockheed-completes-assembly-of-1000th-f-35/156540.article |archive-date=18 January 2024 |access-date=19 January 2024 |website= FlightGlobal}}</ref>
| developed_from = ]
| variants =
| developed_into =
}}


The '''Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II''' is an American family of single-seat, single-engine, supersonic ] ]s. A ] designed for both ] and ] missions, it also has ] and ] capabilities. ] is the prime F-35 contractor with principal partners ] and ]. The aircraft has three main variants: the ] (CTOL) F-35A, the ] (STOVL) F-35B, and the ] (CV) ] (CATOBAR) F-35C.
The '''F-35 Joint Strike Fighter''' ('''JSF''') is a ] ] designed by the ] and the ]. It is intended to replace the current generation of strike fighters, particularly the ] Harrier jump jets : the ] (US), ] (UK), and the ] (UK), along with the conventional ], ] and the ]. It is set to be a multi-role ] (a plane with a strong emphasis on ] and tactical bombing as well as being capable of air-to-air combat), currently in production with ], along with partners ] and ].


The aircraft descends from the ], which in 2001 beat the ] to win the ] (JSF) program intended to replace the ], ], and the ], among others. Its development is principally funded by the United States, with additional funding from program partner countries from the ] (NATO) and close U.S. allies, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/f35/global-partnerships.html |title=F-35 Global Partnerships |website=Lockheed Martin |access-date=31 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120902025203/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/f35/global-partnerships.html |archive-date=2 September 2012}}</ref><ref name="Dudley05Mar12">{{cite web |url=http://defense-update.com/20120305_program-partners-confirm-support-for-f-35-joint-strike-fighter.html |title=Program Partners Confirm Support for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter |first=Richard |last=Dudley |date=5 March 2012 |website=Defence Update}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Pawlyk |first=Oriana |date=28 December 2020 |title=Key US Ally Declares Its F-35s Ready for Combat |url=https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/12/28/key-us-ally-declares-its-f-35s-ready-combat.html|access-date=29 December 2020 |website=Military.com |at=10th paragraph |language=en}}</ref> Several other countries have also ordered, or are considering ordering, the aircraft. The program has ] for its unprecedented size, complexity, ballooning costs, and delayed deliveries.<ref name="F-35 program to get more expensive">{{cite web |last1=Boehm |first1=Eric |title=The $1.7 Trillion F-35 Fighter Jet Program Is About To Get More Expensive |url=https://reason.com/2022/04/26/the-1-7-trillion-f-35-fighter-jet-program-is-about-to-get-more-expensive/ |website=reason.com |date=26 April 2022 |publisher=Reason |access-date=27 April 2022}}</ref>{{refn|{{As of|2023|August}}, the program was 80% over budget and 10 years late.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fortune.com/longform/lockheed-martin-f-35-fighter-jet/ |title=Lockheed Martin’s $1.7 trillion F-35 fighter jet is 10 years late and 80% over budget—and it could be one of the Pentagon’s biggest success stories |date=August 2, 2023 |work=Fortune |access-date=30 November 2024}}</ref>|group=N}} The acquisition strategy of concurrent production of the aircraft while it was still in development and testing led to expensive design changes and retrofits.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-02-22/flawed-f-35-fighter-too-big-to-kill-as-lockheed-hooks-45-states |title=Flawed F-35 Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States |first1=Kathleen |last1=Miller |first2=Tony |last2=Capaccio |first3=Danielle |last3=Ivory |name-list-style=amp |date=22 February 2013 |publisher=Bloomberg L.P.}}</ref><ref name="adamciralsky">{{cite web |url=http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2013/09/joint-strike-fighter-lockheed-martin |title=Will the F-35, the U.S. Military's Flaw-Filled, Years-Overdue Joint Strike Fighter, Ever Actually Fly? |last=Ciralsky |first=Adam |date=16 September 2013 |work=] |access-date=29 September 2015}}</ref> {{As of|2024|July}}, the average ] per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.<ref name=":1" />
Three variants are envisioned: the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35A for the ] (USAF) and the ]; the Advanced Short Take-Off Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) F-35B for the ] (USMC) and the ] (RN); and the ]-based (CV) F-35C for the ] (USN). The USAF is considering the F-35B, and the Royal Navy is considering ordering the F-35C variant for its large ] Future Carrier program.


The F-35 first flew in 2006 and entered service with the ] F-35B in July 2015, followed by the U.S. Air Force F-35A in August 2016 and the U.S. Navy F-35C in February 2019.<ref name="USMC_IOC"/><ref name="defready aug16">{{cite news |url=http://www.defensenews.com/story/breaking-news/2016/08/02/f35-ioc-air-force-operational-acc-combat/87948142/ |title=Air Force Declares F-35A Ready for Combat |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |date=2 August 2016 |work=Defense News}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |url=https://news.usni.org/2019/02/28/navy-declares-initial-operational-capability-for-f-35c-joint-strike-fighter |title=Navy Declares Initial Operational Capability for F-35C Joint Strike Fighter |first=Megan |last=Eckstein |website=USNI News |date=28 February 2019}}</ref> The aircraft was first ] by the ].<ref name="first strike">{{cite web |url=https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/IAF-commander-Israel-first-to-use-F-35-jet-in-combat-558030 |title=IAF Commander: Israel First To Use F-35 Jet In Combat |first=Anna |last=Ahronheim |work=] |date=22 May 2018}}</ref> The U.S. plans to buy 2,456 F-35s through 2044, which will represent the bulk of the crewed tactical aviation of the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps for several decades; the aircraft is planned to be a cornerstone of NATO and U.S.-allied air power and to operate to 2070.<ref name="FY2020_SAR"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2021/06/14/us-european-command-nato-may-450-f-35s-2030/ |title=US European Command/NATO May Have 450 F-35s by 2030 |work=Aviation Today |date=14 June 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheed-f-35-service-life-extended-to-2070-423536/ |title=Lockheed F-35 service life extended to 2070 |first=James |last=Drew |date=25 March 2016 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref>
The F-35, expected to be ready for service in ], is scheduled to begin replacing Marine Corps AV-8B Harrier and F/A-18s in ], and the USAF ] and F-16 in ].


== Development ==
==International participation==
{{Main|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II development}}
] propulsion system is designed and manufactured by ].]]
The primary customers are the armed forces of the United States (USAF, USN, and USMC) and the United Kingdom (RAF and RN). There are three levels of international participation for the eight countries contributing to the program. The United Kingdom is the sole level I partner, contributing a little over $2 billion. Level II partners are ] and the ], contributing $1 billion and $800 million respectively. At level III are ] ($175 million), ] ($144 million), ] ($122 million), ] ($110 million), and ] ($100 million). The levels generally indicate the financial stake in the program, the level of technology transfer and subcontracts open for bid by national companies, and the general order in which countries can obtain production aircraft. ] and ] have also joined as Security Cooperative Participants. <ref>Katherine V. Schnasi ''US Accounts Office''. Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>


===Program origins===
The biggest international partner, the United Kingdom, has invested two billion in development funding for the project. Britain has also worked for five years for an ] waiver to allow greater technology transfer associated with the project. The effort, backed by the Bush administration, has been repeatedly blocked by U.S. Congressman ] because of his concern about potential technology transfer to third countries. <ref>Spiegel, Peter, MSNBC . ''Financial Times'' (MSNBC reprint). Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>
The F-35 was the product of the ] (JSF) program, which was the merger of various combat aircraft programs from the 1980s and 1990s. One progenitor program was the ] (DARPA) Advanced Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) which ran from 1983 to 1994; ASTOVL aimed to develop a ] replacement for the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and the UK ]. Under one of ASTOVL's classified programs, the Supersonic STOVL Fighter (SSF), ] ] conducted research for a stealthy supersonic STOVL fighter intended for both U.S. Air Force (USAF) and USMC; among key STOVL technologies explored was the shaft-driven lift fan (SDLF) system. Lockheed's concept was a single-engine ] delta aircraft weighing about {{cvt|24000|lb|kg}} empty. ASTOVL was rechristened as the ] (CALF) in 1993 and involved ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.codeonemagazine.com/images/C1_V09N3_SM_1271449318_9088.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200129013128/http://www.codeonemagazine.com/images/C1_V09N3_SM_1271449318_9088.pdf |archive-date=2020-01-29 |url-status=live |website=Code One Magazine |publisher=Lockheed |title=Common Lightweight Fighter |first=Stadler |last=Rich |date=October 1994}}</ref><ref name="pre-jast_hist">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_prejast.htm |title=History (Pre-JAST) |work=Joint Strike Fighter |access-date=24 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191206155846/http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_prejast.htm |archive-date=6 December 2019 }}</ref>


The end of the ] and the ] in 1991 caused considerable reductions in ] (DoD) spending and subsequent restructuring. In 1993, the Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program emerged following the cancellation of the USAF's Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) and U.S. Navy's (USN) Advanced Attack/Fighter (A/F-X) programs. MRF, a program for a relatively affordable ] replacement, was scaled back and delayed due to post–Cold War defense posture easing F-16 fleet usage and thus extending its service life as well as increasing budget pressure from the ] ] (ATF) program. The A/F-X, initially known as the Advanced-Attack (A-X), began in 1991 as the USN's follow-on to the Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) program for an ] replacement; the ATA's resulting ] had been canceled due to technical problems and cost overruns in 1991. In the same year, the termination of the Naval Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF), a naval development of USAF's ATF program to replace the ], resulted in additional fighter capability being added to A-X, which was then renamed A/F-X. Amid increased budget pressure, the DoD's Bottom-Up Review (BUR) in September 1993 announced MRF's and A/F-X's cancellations, with applicable experience brought to the emerging JAST program.<ref name="pre-jast_hist"/> JAST was not meant to develop a new aircraft, but rather to develop requirements, mature technologies, and demonstrate concepts for advanced strike warfare.<ref name="jast_hist">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_jast.htm |title=History (JAST) |work=Joint Strike Fighter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190715052740/http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_jast.htm |archive-date=15 July 2019 |access-date=24 January 2020 }}</ref>
The CEO of ], the British contractor on the plane, has complained that the U.S. has not given the UK (and his company) access to the crucial ] of the plane's software, thus making it impossible for the UK to maintain and modify the JSF independently. At a news conference at the Paris Air Show, he has even suggested that the UK may withdraw from the program unless additional access is granted, though analysts consider this unlikely <ref>Fletcher,Matthew; Katz,Alan (June 16, 2005). . ''Bloomberg.com''. Retrieved Feb. 08 , 2006.</ref>. On 21 December 2005 an article was published in the '']'' saying that MPs viewed as "unacceptable" the U.S. refusal to grant access to the source code. The article quotes the chairman of the Commons Defence Select Committee as saying that unless the UK receives assurances of access to the software information, "the UK might have to consider whether to continue in the programme".<ref>UK Defense Committee Statement ''UK Parliament''. Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref> Nonetheless, UK production commenced on 2 February 2006.<ref>Helen Jocelyn ''BAE Systems''. Retrieved Feb.08, 2006.</ref>


As JAST progressed, the need for concept demonstrator aircraft by 1996 emerged, which would coincide with the full-scale flight demonstrator phase of ASTOVL/CALF. Because the ASTOVL/CALF concept appeared to align with the JAST charter, the two programs were eventually merged in 1994 under the JAST name, with the program now serving the USAF, USMC, and USN.<ref name="jast_hist"/> JAST was subsequently renamed to Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1995, with STOVL submissions by McDonnell Douglas, ], ],{{refn|Lockheed acquired General Dynamics fighter division at Fort Worth in 1993 and merged with Martin Marietta in 1995 to form Lockheed Martin.|group=N}} and Boeing. The JSF was expected to eventually replace large numbers of multi-role and strike fighters in the inventories of the US and its allies, including the Harrier, F-16, ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Barrie |first1=Douglas |last2=Norris |first2=Guy |last3=Warwick |first3=Graham |name-list-style=amp |date=4 April 1995 |title=Short take-off, low funding |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1995/1995%20-%200833.html |work=FlightGlobal |access-date=24 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150717172813/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1995/1995%20-%200833.html |archive-date=17 July 2015 }}</ref>
International participants have at various times been cited as considering withdrawing from the JSF Program in favor of other aircraft such as ], ] or ]. Perceived inequitable sharing in JSF production is most often cited as the reason for considering withdrawal, rather than cost or performance concerns.


International participation is a key aspect of the JSF program, starting with United Kingdom participation in the ASTOVL program. Many international partners requiring modernization of their air forces were interested in the JSF. The United Kingdom joined JAST/JSF as a founding member in 1995 and thus became the only Tier 1 partner of the JSF program;<ref name="T1partner">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.org.uk/ |title=The JSF UK Industry Team |work=Martin Baker Aircraft Company Limited |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427142906/http://www.jsf.org.uk/ |archive-date=27 April 2006}}</ref> Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Canada, Australia, and Turkey joined the program during the Concept Demonstration Phase (CDP), with Italy and the Netherlands being Tier 2 partners and the rest Tier 3. Consequently, the aircraft was developed in cooperation with international partners and available for export.<ref name="UKJAST">{{cite news |title=US, UK sign JAST agreement |date=25 November 1995 |work=Aerospace Daily |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |page=451}}</ref>
==Program history ==
] (left) and Lockheed Martin X-35 prior to down-select in 2001, where the X-35 was chosen. DoD photo]]


===JSF competition===
The ] (JAST) program was created in 1993 as a result of a ] (DoD) ''Bottom-Up-Review''. The major tactical aviation results of the review were to continue the ongoing ] and F/A-18E/F programs, cancel the ] (MRF) and the A/F-X programs, curtail ] and F/A-18C/D procurement, and initiate the JAST Program.
{{main|Joint Strike Fighter program|Lockheed Martin X-35}}


Boeing and Lockheed Martin were selected in early 1997 for CDP, with their concept demonstrator aircraft designated ] and ] respectively; the McDonnell Douglas team was eliminated and Northrop Grumman and ] joined the Lockheed Martin team. Each firm would produce two prototype air vehicles to demonstrate conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), carrier takeoff and landing (CV), and STOVL.{{refn|As these were concept demonstrator aircraft for risk reduction, they did not need to have the internal structure or most subsystems of the final aircraft as a weapon system.|group=N}} Lockheed Martin's design would make use of the work on the SDLF system conducted under the ASTOVL/CALF program. The key aspect of the X-35 that enabled STOVL operation, the SDLF system consists of the lift fan in the forward center fuselage that could be activated by engaging a clutch that connects the driveshaft to the turbines and thus augmenting the thrust from the engine's swivel nozzle. Research from prior aircraft incorporating similar systems, such as the ],{{refn|The F-35 swivel nozzle design was pioneered by the Convair Model 200.<ref>{{cite web |last=Renshaw |first=Kevin |url=https://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_article.html?item_id=137 |title=F-35B Lightning II Three-Bearing Swivel Nozzle |work=Code One Magazine |date=12 August 2014}}</ref>|group=N}} ], and ], were also taken into consideration.<ref name="GovExec">{{cite web |url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0102/012202db.htm |title=The engine that could |first=George C. |last=Wilson |date=22 January 2002 |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019160442/http://www.govexec.com/defense/defense-beat/2002/01/the-engine-that-could/10890/ |archive-date=19 October 2013}}</ref><ref name="LiftFanPatent1">{{cite web |url=http://www.patentgenius.com/patent/5209428.html |title=Propulsion system for a vertical and short takeoff and landing aircraft, United States Patent 5209428 |date=7 May 1990 |website=PatentGenius.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120225075708/http://www.patentgenius.com/patent/5209428.html |archive-date=25 February 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Gunston |first=Bill |author-link=Bill Gunston |date=1997 |title=Yakovlev Aircraft since 1924 |url=https://archive.org/details/yakovlevaircraft00guns/page/n16 |url-access=limited |location=London |publisher=Putnam Aeronautical Books |page=16 |isbn=1-55750-978-6}}</ref> By contrast, Boeing's X-32 employed direct lift system that the augmented turbofan would be reconfigured to when engaging in STOVL operation.
The JAST program office was established on ], ]. It was established to define and develop ], ], and ] that would support the future development of tactical aircraft. The final goal was to replace several aging U.S. and UK aircraft with a common family of aircraft, of which the JSF is one example.


]
It will complement the USAF's high-end ] air superiority fighter and the USN's ] as well as Europe's Eurofighter.
Lockheed Martin's commonality strategy was to replace the STOVL variant's SDLF with a fuel tank and the aft swivel nozzle with a two-dimensional thrust vectoring nozzle for the CTOL variant.{{refn|The thrust vectoring nozzle would eventually be replaced by an axisymmetric low-observable nozzle to reduce weight.|group=N}} STOVL operation is made possible through a patented shaft-driven LiftFan propulsion system.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Welt |first=Flying |date=2023-10-29 |title=Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II: Top 10 things to know |url=https://www.flyingwelt.com/2023/10/lockheed-martin-f-35-lightning-ii-top-10-things-to-know/ |access-date=2023-11-21 |website=Flying Welt |language=en-US}}</ref> This would enable identical aerodynamic configuration for the STOVL and CTOL variants, while the CV variant would have an enlarged wing to reduce landing speed for carrier recovery. Due to aerodynamic characteristics and carrier recovery requirements from the JAST merger, the design configuration settled on a conventional tail compared to the canard delta design from the ASTOVL/CALF; notably, the conventional tail configuration offers much lower risk for carrier recovery compared to the ASTOVL/CALF canard configuration, which was designed without carrier compatibility in mind. This enabled greater commonality between all three variants, as the commonality goal was important at this design stage.<ref name="jast_to_ioc">{{cite journal |last1=Sheridan |first1=Arthur E. |last2=Burnes |first2=Robert |date=13 August 2019 |title=F-35 Program History: From JAST to IOC |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/5.9781624105678.0001.0076 |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) |page=50 |doi=10.2514/5.9781624105678.0001.0076 |isbn=978-1-62410-566-1}}</ref> Lockheed Martin's prototypes would consist of the X-35A for demonstrating CTOL before converting it to the X-35B for STOVL demonstration and the larger-winged X-35C for CV compatibility demonstration.<ref name="JPP">{{cite journal |last=Bevilaqua |first=Paul M. |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.15228 |title=Joint Strike Fighter Dual-Cycle Propulsion System |journal=Journal of Propulsion and Power |date=September 2005 |doi=10.2514/1.15228 |volume=21 |issue=5 |pages=778–783| issn = 0748-4658 }}</ref>


The X-35A first flew on 24 October 2000 and conducted flight tests for subsonic and supersonic flying qualities, handling, range, and maneuver performance.<ref name="jsf_hist">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_jsf.htm |title=History (JSF) |work=Joint Strike Fighter |access-date=24 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190715053937/http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_jsf.htm |archive-date=15 July 2019 }}</ref> After 28 flights, the aircraft was then converted into the X-35B for STOVL testing, with key changes including the addition of the SDLF, the three-bearing swivel module (3BSM), and roll-control ducts. The X-35B would successfully demonstrate the SDLF system by performing stable hover, vertical landing, and short takeoff in less than {{cvt|500|ft}}.<ref name="jast_to_ioc"/><ref name="Nova transcript X-planes">{{cite episode |title=Battle of the X-Planes |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/xplanes/ |series=] |credits=Schreiber, Liev |network=] |air-date=3 February 2003 |transcript=Battle of the X-Planes |transcript-url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3004_xplanes.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190629060323/https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3004_xplanes.html |archive-date=29 June 2019 |access-date=25 January 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> The X-35C first flew on 16 December 2000 and conducted field landing carrier practice tests.<ref name="jsf_hist"/>
===Concept demonstration===
The contract for development of the prototypes was awarded on ] ] to Lockheed Martin and ], under which each was to produce two aircraft which were to demonstrate Conventional Take Off and Landing (CTOL), carrier take off and landing (CV version), and Short Take Off and Vertical Landing (]).


On 26 October 2001, Lockheed Martin was declared the winner and was awarded the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) contract; ] was separately awarded a development contract for the ] engine for the JSF.<ref name="f35_acq_hist">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_f35.htm |title=History (F-35 Acquisition) |work=Joint Strike Fighter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190706050004/http://www.jsf.mil/history/his_f35.htm |archive-date=6 July 2019 |access-date=23 January 2021 }}</ref> The F-35 designation, which was out of sequence with ], was allegedly determined on the spot by program manager Major General Mike Hough; this came as a surprise even to Lockheed Martin, which had expected the F-24 designation for the JSF.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.designation-systems.net/usmilav/nonstandard-mds.html#_MDS_F35 |title=Non-Standard DOD Aircraft Designations |first=Andreas |last=Parsch |date=27 April 2006 |website=Designation Systems}}</ref>
Also in 1996 the UK ] launched the ] project, a replacement for the ] (and later the ]), for which the Joint Strike Fighter was selected in January 2001.


===System development and demonstration=== ===Design and production===
] testing model in {{convert|16|ft|0|adj=on}} transonic wind tunnel at the ]|alt=Engineer handling a metallic scale model of jet fighter in wind-tunnel]]
The construction contract, System Development and Demonstration (SDD), was awarded on ], ] to the Lockheed Martin X-35, beating the ]. The first planes are expected to enter service in 2008. Announcing the decision, DoD officials and the UK ] said that while both aircraft met or exceeded requirements, the X-35 outperformed the Boeing aircraft consistently. This dominance can only have been achieved by Lockheed's method of STOVL flight; in fact, the decision is said to have clinched the contract.


As the JSF program moved into the System Development and Demonstration phase, the X-35 demonstrator design was modified to create the F-35 combat aircraft. The forward fuselage was lengthened by {{convert|5|in|cm}} to make room for mission avionics, while the horizontal stabilizers were moved {{convert|2|in|cm}} aft to retain balance and control. The ] changed from a four-sided to a three-sided cowl shape and was moved {{convert|30|in|cm}} aft. The fuselage section was fuller, the top surface raised by {{convert|1|in|cm}} along the centerline and the lower surface bulged to accommodate weapons bays. Following the designation of the X-35 prototypes, the three variants were designated F-35A (CTOL), F-35B (STOVL), and F-35C (CV), all with a design service life of 8,000 hours. Prime contractor Lockheed Martin performs overall systems integration and final assembly and checkout (FACO) at ] in ],{{refn|FACO is also performed in Italy and Japan for some partner and export customers as part of the industrial benefits from international cooperation.|group=N}} while Northrop Grumman and ] supply components for mission systems and airframe.<ref>Keijsper 2007, pp. 122, 124.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_article.html?item_id=28 |website=Code One Magazine |publisher=Lockheed Martin |title=X to F: F-35 Lightning II And Its X-35 Predecessors |first=Eric |last=Hehs |date=15 May 2008}}</ref>
==Design==
]
* ]
* Integrated avionics and sensor fusion - This allows information from off board sensors to be combined with those on-board the aircraft, to enhance the pilot's situational awareness and improve precision weapon delivery.
* Low construction cost
* Low maintenance cost


Adding the systems of a fighter aircraft added weight. The F-35B gained the most, largely due to a 2003 decision to enlarge the weapons bays for commonality between variants; the total weight growth was reportedly up to {{convert|2200|lb}}, over 8%, causing all STOVL key performance parameter (KPP) thresholds to be missed.<ref name="Keijsper 2007, p. 119">Keijsper 2007, p. 119</ref> In December 2003, the STOVL Weight Attack Team (SWAT) was formed to reduce the weight increase; changes included thinned airframe members, smaller weapons bays and vertical stabilizers, less thrust fed to the roll-post outlets, and redesigning the wing-mate joint, electrical elements, and the airframe immediately aft of the cockpit. The inlet was also revised to accommodate more powerful, greater mass flow engines.<ref name="thrust_target">{{cite news |last=Norris |first=Guy |title=Alternate JSF Engine Thrust Beats Target |work=Aviation Week |date=13 August 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |title=USAF Plans for Fighters Change |first1=David A. |last1=Fulghum |first2=Robert |last2=Wall |date=19 September 2004 |magazine=]}}</ref> Many changes from the SWAT effort were applied to all three variants for commonality. By September 2004, these efforts had reduced the F-35B's weight by over {{convert|3000|lb|kg|sigfig=2}}, while the F-35A and F-35C were reduced in weight by {{convert|2400|lb}} and {{convert|1900|lb}} respectively.<ref name="jast_to_ioc"/><ref>Keijsper 2007, p. 124,</ref> The weight reduction work cost $6.2&nbsp;billion and caused an 18-month delay.<ref name="C4WDefault-3831104">{{cite web |url=http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/weight-watchers-13117183/?all |title=Weight Watchers: How a team of engineers and a crash diet saved the Joint Strike Fighter |work=Air & Space Magazine |date=November 2006 |first=Joe |last=Pappalardo |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140525213930/http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/weight-watchers-13117183/?all |archive-date=25 May 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The rival Boeing X-32 adopted the relatively elegant Direct Lift System, where the exhaust gases were redirected to thrust vectoring nozzles to achieve lift during a STOVL landing. However, the X-35 utilized the far more complex Remote Shaft-Driven Fan concept, where extra LP turbine expansion developed additional power which was diverted, via a clutch-and-bevel gearbox, to a vertically mounted, contra-rotating, remote fan. The airstreams of both the remote fan and the normal fan were exhausted through thrust vectoring nozzles to provide lift during the STOVL landing phase. This method has the additional benefit of lowering environmental effects during (primarily) landing, where the thermal effects on, for example, a carrier deck are greatly reduced. In effect, the X-35 power plant acted as a flow multiplier and consequently had more than sufficient thrust for lift operations. The same cannot be said for the X-32 power plant, where even though the fan was oversized and throttle-pushed, it had insufficient thrust for lift. Because of the large engine airflow, the X-32 required a huge front air intake, compromising the aesthetics of the aircraft's aerodynamics. According to critics, Boeing designed an airplane "only its mother would love", in direct violation of the maxim "if it looks good, it flies good". Both the X-32 and X-35 power plants were derived from Pratt & Whitney F119, with the STOVL variant of the latter incorporating ] Lift Fan module.


]
Note also that elements of the JSF design were pioneered by the F-22. The airframe appears quite similar to the F-22, albeit somewhat reduced in size, and only has a single engine.
The first F-35A, designated AA-1, was rolled out at Fort Worth on 19 February 2006 and first flew on 15 December 2006 with chief test pilot Jon S. Beesley at the controls.{{refn|This first prototype lacked the weight optimization from SWAT.|group=N}}<ref name="9jul2013">{{cite web |url=http://www.westdef.com/presentations/2013presentations/Keith_Knotts.pdf |title=CF-35 Lightning II: Canada's Next Generation Fighter |first=Keith P. |last=Knotts |date=9 July 2013 |website=Westdef.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140221233717/http://www.westdef.com/presentations/2013presentations/Keith_Knotts.pdf |archive-date=21 February 2014}}</ref> In 2006, the F-35 was given the name "Lightning II" after the ] of World War II.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/130499/lightning-ii-moniker-given-to-joint-strike-fighter/ |title='Lightning II' moniker given to Joint Strike Fighter |date=7 June 2006 |work=U.S. Air Force}}</ref> Some USAF pilots have nicknamed the aircraft "Panther" instead, and other nicknames include "Fat Amy" and "Battle Penguin".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20914/the-f-35-has-a-new-nickname-given-to-it-by-the-usafs-most-elite-pilots |title=The Air Force's Elite Weapons School Has Given The F-35 A New Nickname |last=Rogoway |first=Tyler |date=17 May 2018 |work=The War Zone |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180813044728/http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20914/the-f-35-has-a-new-nickname-given-to-it-by-the-usafs-most-elite-pilots |archive-date=13 August 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2023/12/30/five-things-that-happened-in-2023the-fighter-pilots-quick-take/ |title=5 Things That Happened In 2023 - The Fighter Pilot's Quick-Take |last=Tegler |first=Eric |date=30 December 2023 |work=Forbes}}</ref><ref>{{Cite Instagram |user=nellisafb |postid=C6MpVbcBu50 |title=It's World Penguin day! Here are some awesome shots of the F-35 Lightning II, a.k.a. "Battle Penguin" |date=25 April 2024}}</ref>


The aircraft's software was developed as six releases, or Blocks, for SDD. The first two Blocks, 1A and 1B, readied the F-35 for initial pilot training and multi-level security. Block 2A improved the training capabilities, while 2B was the first combat-ready release planned for the USMC's ] (IOC). Block 3i retains the capabilities of 2B while having new Technology Refresh 2 (TR-2) hardware and was planned for the USAF's IOC. The final release for SDD, Block 3F, would have full flight envelope and all baseline combat capabilities. Alongside software releases, each block also incorporates avionics hardware updates and air vehicle improvements from flight and structural testing.<ref name="lm_sw">{{cite web |url=https://www.f35.com/about/life-cycle/software |title=F-35 Software Development |work=Lockheed Martin |access-date=2 February 2020 |archive-date=2 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200702032933/https://www.f35.com/about/life-cycle/software }}</ref> In what is known as "concurrency", some ] (LRIP) aircraft lots would be delivered in early Block configurations and eventually upgraded to Block 3F once development is complete.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06356.pdf |title=GAO-06-356: DOD Plans to Enter Production before Testing Demonstrates Acceptable Performance |work=Government Accountability Office |date=March 2006 |access-date=4 December 2011 |archive-date=1 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801012121/https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06356.pdf }}</ref> After 17,000&nbsp;flight test hours, the final flight for the SDD phase was completed in April 2018.<ref>{{cite web |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/04/12/f-35-program-office-wraps-up-final-developmental-flight-test/ |title=F-35 program office wraps up final developmental flight test |work=Defense News |date=28 April 2018}}</ref> Like the F-22, the F-35 has been targeted by ]s and technology theft efforts, as well as potential vulnerabilities in the integrity of the supply chain.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|last=Haynes|first=Deborah|author-link=Deborah Haynes|date=15 June 2019|title=F-35 jets: Chinese-owned company making parts for top-secret UK-US fighters|url=https://news.sky.com/story/f-35-jets-chinese-owned-company-making-parts-for-top-secret-uk-us-fighters-11741889|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/06/15/chinese-owned-company-supplies-electronics-on-u-s-and-u-k-f-35-fighter-jets/ |title=U.S. and U.K. F-35 Jets Include 'Core' Circuit Boards From Chinese-Owned Company |last=Doffman |first=Zak |date=15 June 2019 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Minnick |first=Wendell |url=https://www.defensenews.com/breaking-news/2016/03/24/chinese-businessman-pleads-guilty-of-spying-on-f-35-and-f-22/ |title=Chinese Businessman Pleads Guilty of Spying on F-35 and F-22 |website=Defense News |date=24 March 2016 |access-date=9 April 2019}}</ref>
=== Advanced weapons ===
The direct lift fan assembly, when not installed, provides approximately 100 ft<sup>3</sup> of space <ref>Morris, Jefferson (Sept. 26, 2002). . ''Aerospace Daily'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>, along with more than 27,000 ] (20 ]) available for electrical power production <ref>Fulghum, David A. (July 8, 2002). . ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>. This has made ]s possible for the F-35. Some of these designs, including solid state lasers and high-power microwave beams, are thought to be nearing operational status <ref> Fulghum, David A. (July 22, 2002). . ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>.


] in February 2011.]]
== Possible reduction to two primary variants ==
Testing found several major problems: early F-35B airframes were vulnerable to premature cracking,{{refn|Early F-35Bs have a service life as low as 2,100&nbsp;hours before retrofits as seen on Lot 9 and later aircraft.|group=N}} the F-35C arrestor hook design was unreliable, fuel tanks were too vulnerable to lightning strikes, the helmet display had problems, and more. Software was repeatedly delayed due to its unprecedented scope and complexity. In 2009, the DoD Joint Estimate Team (JET) estimated that the program was 30 months behind the public schedule.<ref name="internalmemo">{{cite news |title=Internal Pentagon memo predicts that F-35 testing won't be complete until 2016 |first=Bob |last=Cox |date=1 March 2010 |newspaper=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-06/lockheed-f-35-purchases-delayed-in-pentagon-s-fiscal-2011-plan.html |title=Lockheed F-35 Purchases Delayed in Pentagon's Fiscal 2011 Plan |first=Tony |last=Capaccio |date=6 January 2010 |website=Bloomberg BusinessWeek |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100110005120/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-06/lockheed-f-35-purchases-delayed-in-pentagon-s-fiscal-2011-plan.html |archive-date=10 January 2010}}</ref> In 2011, the program was "re-baselined"; that is, its cost and schedule goals were changed, pushing the IOC from the planned 2010 to July 2015.<ref>{{cite web |last=Charette |first=Robert |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/f35-program-continues-to-struggle-with-software |title=F-35 Program Continues to Struggle with Software |work=IEEE Spectrum |date=12 September 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2018/pdf/dod/2018f35jsf.pdf |title=FY18 DOD Programs F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) |year=2018 |website=] |page=25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190626203053/https://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2018/pdf/dod/2018f35jsf.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2019 }}</ref> The decision to simultaneously test, fix defects, and begin production was criticized as inefficient; in 2014, ] ] called it "acquisition malpractice".<ref>{{cite episode |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/f-35-joint-strike-fighter-60-minutes/ |title=Is the F-35 worth it? |series=] |network=CBS News |air-date=16 February 2014}}</ref> The three variants shared just 25% of their parts, far below the anticipated commonality of 70%.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Tirpak |first=John |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/all-for-one-and-all-for-all/ |title=All For One and One for All |magazine=Air Force |date=14 March 2016}}</ref>
Experts predicted in 2005 that the JSF program's Conventional Take-off and Landing F-35A variant may be canceled by acting U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England. <ref>Selinger, Marc (Nov. 21, 2005). . ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref> This would not immediately save money in the program as the preproduction F-35A prototypes are already under construction, but long term, this cancellation could free up enough money to ensure that the program's F-35B and F-35C variants survive in the United States' tightening defense budget. Since then a flurry of lobbying from the JSF contractors, the Air Force, and representatives from the United Kingdom has convinced Secretary England and the DoD to stick with the 3-variant program.


The program received considerable criticism for cost overruns and for the total projected lifetime cost, as well as quality management shortcomings by contractors.<ref name="violations">{{Cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-united-tech-fighter-engine/u-s-watchdog-finds-quality-violations-in-pratt-work-on-f-35-engine-idUSKBN0NI1TL20150427 |title=U.S. watchdog finds quality violations in Pratt work on F-35 engine |last=Shalal |first=Andrea |date=27 April 2015 |work=]}}</ref><ref name="barrett">{{cite news |first=Paul |last=Barrett |title=Danger Zone |work=Bloomberg Businessweek |date=10 April 2017 |pages=50–55 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-04-04/is-the-f-35-a-trillion-dollar-mistake}}</ref> {{As of|2023|August}}, the program was 80% over budget and 10 years late.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Leonard |first=Christopher |title=Lockheed Martin’s $1.7 trillion F-35 fighter jet is 10 years late and 80% over budget—and it could be one of the Pentagon’s biggest success stories |url=https://fortune.com/longform/lockheed-martin-f-35-fighter-jet/ |access-date=2024-12-01 |website=Fortune |language=en}}</ref>
Had such a cancellation occurred, the United States Air Force would stay in the program by purchasing either the STOVL F-35B for its close air support capabilities, the F-35C for its greater range, or a combination of the two. However, buys of these variants would likely be less than the 1000+ CTOL originally envisioned by the Air Force, as both variants cost more. This would have been a boon for A-10 and F-16 supporters, since those aircraft would probably be retained longer to compensate.


The JSF program was expected to cost about $200 billion for acquisition in base-year 2002 dollars when SDD was awarded in 2001.<ref>{{cite news |last=Schneider |first=Greg |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/10/27/lockheed-martin-beats-boeing-for-fighter-contract/c65b8843-131f-4827-9c69-c183066f1f57/ |title=Lockheed Martin Beats Boeing for Fighter Contract |newspaper=] |date=27 October 2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Dao |first=James |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/27/us/lockheed-wins-200-billion-deal-for-fighter-jet.html |title=Lockheed Wins $200 Billion Deal for Fighter Jet |work=The New York Times |date=27 October 2001}}</ref> As early as 2005, the ] (GAO) had identified major program risks in cost and schedule.<ref>{{cite news |last=Merle |first=Renae |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38236-2005Mar15.html |title=GAO Questions Cost Of Joint Strike Fighter |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=15 March 2005}}</ref> The costly delays strained the relationship between the Pentagon and contractors.<ref>{{cite web |last=Shalal-Esa |first=Andrea |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter/pentagon-tells-lockheed-to-shape-up-on-f-35-fighter-idUSBRE88H00D20120918 |title=Pentagon tells Lockheed to shape up on F-35 fighter |work=Reuters |date=17 September 2012}}</ref> By 2017, delays and cost overruns had pushed the F-35 program's expected acquisition costs to $406.5&nbsp;billion, with total lifetime cost (i.e., to 2070) to $1.5&nbsp;trillion in then-year dollars which also includes operations and maintenance.<ref name="C4WDefault-2683969">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2014/January%202014/January%2008%202014/The-Cost-of-Teamwork.aspx |title=The Cost of Teamwork |magazine=Air Force |date=8 January 2014 |first=John A. |last=Tirpak |publisher=Air Force Association |location=Arlington, Virginia |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140525023853/http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2014/January%202014/January%2008%202014/The-Cost-of-Teamwork.aspx |archive-date=25 May 2014 |access-date=12 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-10/f-35-program-costs-jump-to-406-billion-in-new-pentagon-estimate |title=F-35 Program Costs Jump to $406.5 Billion in Latest Estimate |first=Anthony |last=Capaccio |date=10 July 2017 |website=Bloomberg}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/f35-fighter-jet-pentagon/ |title=The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Addiction to the F-35 Fighter |first=William J. |last=Astore |date=16 September 2019 |magazine=] |access-date=30 October 2019 |archive-date=6 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191206140954/https://www.thenation.com/article/f35-fighter-jet-pentagon/ }}</ref> The F-35A's unit cost (not including engine) for LRIP Lot 13 was $79.2&nbsp;million in base-year 2012 dollars.<ref name="lrip_13">{{cite magazine |last=Tirpak |first=John |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/massive-34-billion-f-35-contract-includes-price-drop-as-readiness-improves/ |title=Massive $34 Billion F-35 Contract Includes Price Drop as Readiness Improves |magazine=Air Force |date=29 October 2019}}</ref> Delays in development and operational test and evaluation, including integration into the Joint Simulation Environment, pushed full-rate production decision from the end of 2019 to March 2024, although actual production rate had already approached the full rate by 2020; the combined full rate at the Fort Worth, Italy, and Japan FACO plants is 156 aircraft annually.<ref name="gao">{{Cite web |url=https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/692307.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180606191749/https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/692307.pdf |archive-date=2018-06-06 |url-status=live |title=F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Development Is Nearly Complete, but Deficiencies Found in Testing Need to Be Resolved |website=GAO |date=June 2018 |access-date=12 June 2019}}</ref><ref name="F-35MilestoneC">{{cite web |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/pentagon-finally-approves-f-35-for-full-rate-production-after-5-year-delay/ |title=Pentagon finally approves F-35 for full rate production after 5-year delay |date=12 March 2024 |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref>
Export partners who were already wary of the JSF's rising costs showed some concern over a potential CTOL cancellation. Even the UK, which has no CTOL JSF requirement, lobbied to preserve that variant in order to keep costs of the others down. In the long run, the F-35B and F-35C should still be appealing to at least some of the international market, being the only fifth-generation program with a STOVL variant for countries in need of Harrier replacements.


===Upgrades and further development===
== Analysis of JSF program ==
].]]


The F-35 is expected to be continually upgraded over its lifetime. The first combat-capable Block 2B configuration, which had basic air-to-air and strike capabilities, was declared ready by the USMC in July 2015.<ref name="USMC_IOC"/> The Block 3F configuration began operational test and evaluation (OT&E) in December 2018 and its completion in late 2023 concluded SDD in March 2024.<ref>{{cite web |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |url=https://www.defensenews.com/2018/12/07/after-a-couple-months-delay-the-f-35-moves-into-operational-tests/ |title=After a couple months delay, the F-35 moves into operational tests |work=Defense News |date=6 December 2019}}</ref> The F-35 program is also conducting sustainment and upgrade development, with early aircraft from LRIP lot 2 onwards gradually upgraded to the baseline Block 3F standard by 2021.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Tirpak |first=John |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/article/keeping-the-f-35-ahead-of-the-bad-guys/ |title=Keeping the F-35 Ahead of the Bad Guys |magazine=Air Force |date=25 February 2019}}</ref>{{update inline|date=May 2024}}
Critics of the program maintain that the JSF suffers from ill-defined design goals; that it has insufficient range to make a capable replacement for dedicated bombing aircraft; that its inability to ] limits it as an air defense platform, and that it is almost certain to suffer lengthy development delays and cost overruns; meaning that interim types will have to be purchased to fill the gap between the end of useful life of existing fleets and the introduction of the JSF. However, it is important to note that the multi-role design philosophy has been tested and proven in combat over a period of at least 25 years, with successful types like the F-16 Fighting Falcon and the F-18 Hornet. Several nations, mainly current F-16 and F-18 users, already have sufficient confidence in the design to have committed substantial sums to become minority partners in the JSF manufacturing team.


With Block 3F as the final build for SDD, the first major upgrade program is Block 4 which began development in 2019 and was initially captured under the Continuous Capability Development and Delivery (C2D2) program. Block 4 is expected to enter service in incremental steps from the late 2020s to early 2030s and integrates additional weapons, including those unique to international customers, improved sensor capabilities including the new AN/APG-85 AESA radar and additional ESM bandwidth, and adds Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver (]) support.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.defenseworld.net/news/24904/Lockheed_Martin_Awarded__1_8_Billion_for_F_35_Block_4_Development |title=Lockheed Martin Awarded $1.8 Billion for F-35 Block 4 Development |work=Defense World |date=8 June 2019 |access-date=25 June 2024 |archive-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731040956/https://www.defenseworld.net/news/24904/Lockheed_Martin_Awarded__1_8_Billion_for_F_35_Block_4_Development |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2023/12/19/international-f-35-customers-your-airplanes-will-be-delayed/|title=International F-35 Customers, Your Airplanes Will Be Delayed|first=Eric|last=Tegler|website=Forbes}}</ref> C2D2 also places greater emphasis on ] to enable quicker releases.<ref>{{cite web |last=Zazulia |first=Nick |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2019/03/19/dod-plans-spend-6-6-b-f-35-continuing-development-2024/ |title=U.S. Defense Department Plans to Spend $6.6B on F-35 Continuing Development Through 2024 |work=Avionics International |date=19 March 2019}}</ref>
The program's advocates see the JSF as an opportunity to break out of the decades-old pattern of U.S. military aircraft procurement: instead of a traditional per-service design approach, the JSF is being developed jointly by the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps. This allows an estimated 80% ] between the JSF variants for the different services, lowering procurement and service costs. This follows to a degree the philosophy behind the ] and ] international development programs, the latter being called a multi-role combat aircraft (or MRCA) prior to service entry. Additionally, JSF is the first U.S. aircraft program to consider ''cost as independent variable'' (CAIV). In earlier programs the aircraft cost has been a dependent variable; additional features have always increased the aircraft cost. Such design changes are not being allowed during the JSF development.


The key enabler of Block 4 is Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) avionics hardware, which consists of new display, core processor, and memory modules to support increased processing requirements, as well as engine upgrade that increases the amount of cooling available to support the additional mission systems. The engine upgrade effort explored both improvements to the F135 as well as significantly more power and efficient ]s. In 2018, General Electric and Pratt & Whitney were awarded contracts to develop adaptive cycle engines for potential application in the F-35,{{refn|Adaptive cycle engine technology had been under development under ]'s (AFLCMC) ] (AETP) and its precursors.|group=N}} and in 2022, the F-35 Adaptive Engine Replacement program was launched to integrate them.<ref name="fg20180709"/><ref name=faer_rfi>{{cite web |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/usaf-launches-f-35-advanced-engine-effort |title=USAF Launches F-35 Advanced Engine Effort |work=Janes |date=31 January 2022}}</ref> However, in 2023 the USAF chose an improved F135 under the Engine Core Upgrade (ECU) program over an adaptive cycle engine due to cost as well as concerns over risk of integrating the new engine, initially designed for the F-35A, on the B and C.<ref name="f35_pw_ecu_win">{{cite web |last=Marrow |first=Michael |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2023/03/air-force-will-not-develop-new-f-35-engine-keeping-pratt-as-sole-contractor/ |title=Air Force will not develop new F-35 engine, keeping Pratt as sole contractor |date=13 March 2023 |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref> Difficulties with the new TR-3 hardware, including ], have caused delays to Block 4 as well as a halt in aircraft deliveries from July 2023 to July 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Decker |first=Audrey |date=2023-07-13 |title=F-35 test squadron works to wring out upgrade problems |url=https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2023/07/f-35-test-squadron-works-wring-out-upgrade-problems/388478/ |access-date=2024-04-17 |website=Defense One |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Losey |first=Stephen |date=2024-07-21 |title=F-35 deliveries resume, but upgrade delays have ripple effects |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2024/07/21/f-35-deliveries-resume-but-upgrade-delays-have-ripple-effects/ |access-date=2024-10-06 |website=Defense News |language=en}}</ref>
=== Non-vehicle differentiator ===
A ground-based information system (the Autonomic Logistic Information System, or ALIS), built by Lockheed Martin Simulation Training and Support, is intended to make the JSF less expensive to operate and maintain.


Defense contractors have offered upgrades to the F-35 outside of official program contracts. In 2013, Northrop Grumman disclosed its development of a directional ] suite, named Threat Nullification Defensive Resource (ThNDR). The countermeasure system would share the same space as the Distributed Aperture System (DAS) sensors and acts as a laser missile jammer to protect against infrared-homing missiles.<ref>{{cite web |first=Graham |last=Warwick |url=https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/northrop-develops-laser-missile-jammer-f-35 |title=Northrop Develops Laser Missile Jammer For F-35 |work=Aviation Week |date=12 September 2013 |access-date=2 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140420220645/http://www.aviationweek.com/Article/PrintArticle.aspx?id=%2Farticle-xml%2Fawx_09_12_2013_p0-615904.xml&p=1&printView=true |archive-date=20 April 2014}}</ref>
=== Cost/weight issues ===
Through 2004 the JSF's total projected cost had risen 23% to $244 billion. The major technical problem was the F-35B variant's mass, which was reported to be 2,200 pounds, or 8%, over the target, which meant that the STOVL plane was projected to miss performance requirements.


Israel operates a unique subvariant of the F-35A, designated the F-35I, that is designed to better interface with and incorporate Israeli equipment and weapons. The Israeli Air Force also has their own F-35I test aircraft that provides more access to the core avionics to include their own equipment.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2021/09/israel-wants-to-put-new-equipment-inside-the-f-35-exclusive-qa-with-top-officer/ |title=Israel Wants To Put New Equipment Inside The F-35: Exclusive Q&A With Top Officer |date=21 September 2021 }}{{Dead link|date=November 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Lockheed Martin eventually solved the weight problem by adding engine thrust and shedding over a ton by thinning the aircraft's skin; shrinking the F-35B weapons bay and vertical tails; redesigning the wing-mate joint, portions of the electrical system, and the portion of the aircraft immediately behind the cockpit; and rerouting some thrust from the roll-post outlets to the main nozzle. <ref>Fulghum, David A.; Wall, Robert (Sept.19, 2004). . ''Aviation Week and Space Technology'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>


===Procurement and international participation===
The smaller weapons bay will limit F-35B to 2 x 1000 lb (450 kg) weapons internally (this is as originally planned, for the 2 x 2000 lb requirement was added later). This is not expected to be a hindrance in ] missions, which are likely to take place after enemy air defenses are down. Still, this may make the B variant different from the other two, boosting costs.
{{Main|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement}}
The United States is the primary customer and financial backer, with planned procurement of 1,763 F-35As for the USAF, 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs for the USMC, and 273 F-35Cs for the USN.<ref name="FY2020_SAR">{{cite web |url=https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/19-F-1098_DOC_33_F-35_SAR_Dec_2018.pdf |title=Select Acquisition Report: F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program (F-35) as of FY 2020 President's Budget |date=17 April 2019 |website=] |access-date=5 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200606024641/https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/19-F-1098_DOC_33_F-35_SAR_Dec_2018.pdf |archive-date=6 June 2020 }}</ref> Additionally, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark and Canada have agreed to contribute US$4.375&nbsp;billion towards development costs, with the United Kingdom contributing about 10% of the planned development costs as the sole Tier 1 partner.<ref name="T1partner"/> The initial plan was that the U.S. and eight major partner countries would acquire over 3,100 F-35s through 2035.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/JSF_PSFD_MOU_-_Update_4_2010.PDF |title=Estimated JSF Air Vehicle Procurement Quantities |date=April 2010 |work=Joint Strike Fighter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110627033349/http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/JSF_PSFD_MOU_-_Update_4_2010.PDF |archive-date=27 June 2011}}</ref> The three tiers of international participation generally reflect financial stake in the program, the amount of technology transfer and subcontracts open for bid by national companies, and the order in which countries can obtain production aircraft.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/F-35-Lightning-The-Joint-Strike-Fighter-Program-2012-07501/ |title=F-35 Lightning: The Joint Strike Fighter Program, 2012 |work=Defense Industry Daily |date=30 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130125211010/http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/F-35-Lightning-The-Joint-Strike-Fighter-Program-2012-07501/ |archive-date=25 January 2013}}</ref> Alongside program partner countries, Israel and Singapore have joined as Security Cooperative Participants (SCP).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04554.pdf |title=Joint Strike Fighter Acquisition: Observations on the Supplier Base |first=Katherine V. |last=Schnasi |date=May 2004 |website=US General Accounting Office |access-date=8 February 2006 |archive-date=16 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200816190247/https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04554.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ad-ad.nsf/eng/ad03863.html |title=Industry Canada F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Canada's Next Generation Fighter Capability |website=Government of Canada |date=18 November 2002 |access-date=25 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100922154022/http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ad-ad.nsf/eng/ad03863.html |archive-date=22 September 2010}}</ref><ref>''Combat Aircraft Monthly'', September 2010, p. 24.</ref> Sales to SCP and non-partner states, including Belgium, Japan, and South Korea, are made through the Pentagon's ] program.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{cite web |last=Winters |first=Vice Adm. Mat |url=https://www.defensenews.com/outlook/2018/12/10/head-of-f-35-joint-program-office-stealth-fighter-enters-the-new-year-in-midst-of-a-growing-phase/ |title=Head of F-35 Joint Program Office: Stealth fighter enters the new year in midst of a growing phase |date=9 December 2018 |work=Defense News |access-date=5 February 2020}}</ref> Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in July 2019 over security concerns following its purchase of a Russian ] surface-to-air missile system.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Manson |first1=Katrina |last2=Pitel |first2=Laura |title=US Senate blocks F-35 sales to Turkey |url=https://www.ft.com/content/d3c7492c-7346-11e8-b6ad-3823e4384287 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/d3c7492c-7346-11e8-b6ad-3823e4384287 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |date=19 June 2018 |newspaper=] |access-date=19 June 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/16/politics/trump-turkey-s400-sales/index.html |title=Trump blames Obama as he reluctantly bans F-35 sales to Turkey |first1=Kevin |last1=Liptak |first2=Nicole |last2=Gaouette |date=17 July 2019 |publisher=CNN |access-date=17 July 2019}}</ref>{{refn|Turkey was the sole supplier of several F-35 parts, thus forcing the program to find replacement vendors.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.janes.com/article/83476/f-35-chief-reaffirms-turkey-s-status-as-committed-programme-partner |title=F-35 chief reaffirms Turkey's status as committed programme partner |first=Pat |last=Host |date=1 October 2018 |work=Jane's 360 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181003062144/https://www.janes.com/article/83476/f-35-chief-reaffirms-turkey-s-status-as-committed-programme-partner |archive-date=3 October 2018 }}</ref>|group=N}}


{{As of|2024|July}}, the average ] per plane are: $82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=2024-07-25 |title=F-35’s price might rise, Lockheed warns |url=https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/07/f-35s-price-might-rise-lockheed-warns/398323/#:~:text=The%20deal%20struck%20for%20the,F-35C%20at%20$102.1%20million. |access-date=2024-11-30 |website=Defense One |language=en}}</ref>
The internal weapons are stored offline to the external air flow, which will make for some interesting weapons certification work. The JSF has yet to drop a bomb, fire a missile, or fire a gun airborne—no demonstrations of weapons delivery capability were done during the "winner take all" fly off prior to contract award.


=== USAF STOVL purchase === == Design ==
The JSF program is not immune from interservice politics. A recurring theme has been the potential for a USAF requirement for the F-35B. The STOVL variant had been viewed as the most likely victim of cost-cutting measures; however, a USAF "commitment" seems to guarantee the aircraft that the USMC, RN, and RAF need. It is understood that the U.S. military's experience in ] has highlighted the importance of more flexible assets in the ] role.


===Overview ===
The USAF has investigated buying up to three wings (representing 216 examples) of the F-35B. For a time it appeared that the hypothetical USAF variant of the F-35B would contain enough changes to constitute a new variant (an F-35D). Changes were to include differences in the propulsion system to increase emphasis on ] capability over that of ], a larger wing to allow more fuel, an interior cannon (as opposed to the USMC external gun pod), or changes to the in-flight refueling system. However, due to opposition from people involved with the program, and the associated cost of developing a fourth variant, the USAF version would likely be identical to the USMC/RN F-35B specification.
The F-35 is a family of single-engine, supersonic, stealth multirole strike fighters.<ref name="LHMC">{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35-capabilities.html |title=Capabilities: F-35 Lightning II |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100724021638/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35-capabilities.html |archive-date=24 July 2010}}</ref> The second ] to enter US service and the first operational supersonic STOVL stealth fighter, the F-35 emphasizes low observables, advanced avionics and sensor fusion that enable a high level of situational awareness and long range lethality;<ref>{{cite news |title=F-35 STOVL supersonic |first1=John R. |last1=Kent |first2=Chris |last2=Geisel |website=Lockheed Martin |date=16 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www2.l-3com.com/displays/pdfs/redesign/ICP(2011)_LR.pdf |title=Open System Architecture (OSA) Secure Processing |date=March 2011 |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161104143800/http://www2.l-3com.com/displays/pdfs/redesign/ICP(2011)_LR.pdf |archive-date=4 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/JSF-Integrated-Avionics-Par-Excellence_1067.html |title=JSF: Integrated Avionics Par Excellence |first=Charlotte |last=Adams |date=1 September 2003 |work=Aviation Today |access-date=25 October 2015 |archive-date=16 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161116015654/http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/JSF-Integrated-Avionics-Par-Excellence_1067.html }}</ref> the USAF considers the aircraft its primary strike fighter for conducting ] (SEAD) and ] missions, owing to the advanced sensors and mission systems.<ref>{{cite web |last=Amaani |first=USAF Tech. Sgt. Lyle |date=3 April 2009 |title=Air Force takes combat air acquisitions priorities to Hill |url=http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/120743/air-force-takes-combat-air-acquisitions-priorities-to-hill.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/120743/air-force-takes-combat-air-acquisitions-priorities-to-hill/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>


], F-35B of ] and F-35C of ] near ], 2014]]
=== Australian Participation ===
]
The F-35 has a wing-tail configuration with two vertical stabilizers canted for stealth. Flight control surfaces include ], ]s,{{refn|The F-35C has additional ailerons at the folding sections of the wings.|group=N}} ]s, and all-moving horizontal tails (]s); ]s or chines<ref>CFD predictions of wing pressure distributions on the F-35 at angles-of-attack for transonic maneuvres AIAA 2007 4433</ref> also run forwards to the inlets. The relatively short 35-foot wingspan of the F-35A and F-35B is set by the requirement to fit inside USN amphibious assault ship parking areas and elevators; the F-35C's larger wing is more fuel efficient.<ref name=ryberg1>{{cite web |last=Ryberg |first=Eric S. |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a399988.pdf |title=The Influence of Ship Configuration on the Design of the Joint Strike Fighter |page=5 |website=] |date=26 February 2002 |access-date=1 December 2013 |archive-date=9 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161209001948/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a399988.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Whittle |first=Richard |date=February 2012 |title=The Ultimate Fighter? |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/the-ultimate-fighter-21855513/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230930103845/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/the-ultimate-fighter-21855513/ |archive-date=30 September 2023 |access-date=24 February 2013 |website=Air & Space/Smithsonian Magazine}}</ref> The fixed diverterless supersonic inlets (DSI) use a bumped compression surface and forward-swept cowl to shed the boundary layer of the forebody away from the inlets, which form a Y-duct for the engine.<ref name="dsi">{{cite web |last=Hehs |first=Eric |date=15 July 2000 |title=JSF Diverterless Supersonic Inlet |url=http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=58 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230930190323/http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=58 |archive-date=30 September 2023 |access-date=28 December 2012 |website=Code One Magazine}}</ref> Structurally, the F-35 drew upon lessons from the F-22; composites comprise 35% of airframe weight, with the majority being ] and ]s as well as some ]-reinforced ] in later production lots.<ref>{{cite web |last=Sloan |first=Jeff |date=19 October 2009 |title=Skinning the F-35 fighter |url=http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/skinning-the-f-35-fighter |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231023125135/https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/skinning-the-f-35-fighter |archive-date=23 October 2023 |access-date=24 November 2016 |work=Composites World}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=17 May 2010 |title=Contract Awarded To Validate Process For JSF |url=http://www.onlineamd.com/aerospace-manufacturing-design-Vector-Composites-Quicksteps-amd-051710.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314153109/http://www.onlineamd.com/aerospace-manufacturing-design-Vector-Composites-Quicksteps-amd-051710.aspx |archive-date=14 March 2012 |website=Aerospace Manufacturing and Design}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=26 May 2011 |title=Lockheed Martin reveals F-35 to feature nanocomposite structures |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/05/26/357223/lockheed-martin-reveals-f-35-to-feature-nanocomposite.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110530213822/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/05/26/357223/lockheed-martin-reveals-f-35-to-feature-nanocomposite.html |archive-date=30 May 2011 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> The F-35 is considerably heavier than the lightweight fighters it replaces, with the lightest variant having an empty weight of {{cvt|29300|lb|kg}}; much of the weight can be attributed to the internal weapons bays and the extensive avionics carried.<ref name="F-35_skills_analyzed">{{cite web |last=Nativi |first=Andy |date=5 March 2009 |title=F-35 Air Combat Skills Analyzed |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/F35-030509.xml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101226061121/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news%2FF35-030509.xml |archive-date=26 December 2010 |website=Aviation Week}}</ref>


While lacking the kinematic performance of the larger twin-engine F-22, the F-35 is competitive with ]s such as the F-16 and F/A-18, especially when they carry weapons because the F-35's internal weapons bay eliminates drag from external stores.<ref>{{cite web |last=Crébas |first=Frank |date=May 2018 |title=F-35 – Out of the Shadows |url=https://shop.keypublishing.com/issue/View/issue/CAM1905/combat-aircraft-journal-may-2018 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310074919/https://shop.keypublishing.com/issue/View/issue/CAM1905/combat-aircraft-journal-may-2018 |archive-date=10 March 2021 |access-date=8 February 2020 |publisher=Key Publishing |volume=19 |number=5 |magazine=Combat Aircraft Monthly}}</ref> All variants have a top speed of Mach 1.6, attainable with full internal payload. The Pratt & Whitney F135 engine gives good subsonic acceleration and energy, with supersonic dash in afterburner. The F-35, while not a "supercruising" aircraft, can fly at Mach 1.2 for a dash of {{convert|150|mi|km}} with afterburners. This ability can be useful in battlefield situations.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The F-35's Race Against Time |url=https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1112fighter/ |access-date=2024-06-07 |website=Air & Space Forces Magazine |language=en-US}}</ref> The large stabilitors, leading edge extensions and flaps, and canted rudders provide excellent high alpha (]) characteristics, with a trimmed alpha of 50°. ] and triplex-redundant ] controls provide excellent handling qualities and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aeronautics/afa/beesley-interview.html |title=Flying The F-35: An Interview With Jon Beesley, F-35 Chief Test Pilot |website=Lockheed Martin |access-date=25 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141218222032/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aeronautics/afa/beesley-interview.html |archive-date=18 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Seligman |first=Lara |date=1 March 2016 |title=Norwegian F-35 Pilot Counters Controversial Dogfighting Report |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2016/03/01/norwegian-f-35-pilot-counters-controversial-dogfighting-report/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20171126150710/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2016/03/01/norwegian-f-35-pilot-counters-controversial-dogfighting-report/ |archive-date=26 November 2017 |work=Defense News}}</ref> Having over double the F-16's internal fuel, the F-35 has a considerably greater ], while stealth also enables a more efficient mission flight profile.<ref name="LM_F-35_Status_Fast_Facts"/>
In May 2005 the ] government announced that it was delaying a final decision on the JSF from the initial 2006 decision date to 2008 (and thus past the term of the present government). There are some concerns amongst Australian media, lobby groups and politicians, who have raised doubts that the aircraft will be ready in time to replace the aging Australian air force fleet of ] ground attack planes and F/A-18 fighters.


===Sensors and avionics ===
Concerns have been raised over cost efficiency, ] capability, short range and lack of ]. The government also claims that the cost of purchasing mature F-22s may not be that much greater than the JSF. <ref>Related discussions and analyzes on .</ref>
]


The F-35's mission systems are among the most complex aspects of the aircraft. The avionics and ] are designed to improve the pilot's ] and ] capabilities and facilitate ].<ref name="LHMC" /><ref>{{cite interview |first=Eric |subject=George |title=F-35 avionics: an interview with the Joint Strike Fighter's director of mission systems and software |url=http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-5/news/news/f-35-avionics__an.html |date=1 May 2010 |work=Military & Aerospace Electronics |publisher=PennWell Corporation |volume=21 |issue=5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160101013605/http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-5/news/news/f-35-avionics__an.html |archive-date=1 January 2016 }}</ref> Key sensors include the ] ] ] (AESA) radar, ] AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda ] system, Northrop Grumman/] ] (DAS), Lockheed Martin AN/AAQ-40 Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS) and Northrop Grumman AN/ASQ-242 Communications, Navigation, and Identification (CNI) suite. The F-35 was designed for its sensors to work together to provide a cohesive image of the local ]; for example, the APG-81 radar also acts as a part of the electronic warfare system.<ref name="aviationtoday.com">{{cite web |last=Sherman |first=Ron |date=1 July 2006 |title=F-35 Electronic Warfare Suite: More Than Self-Protection |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2006/04/01/f-35-electronic-warfare-suite-more-than-self-protection/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2006/04/01/f-35-electronic-warfare-suite-more-than-self-protection/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=4 August 2010 |website=Aviation Today}}</ref>
It should be noted on this claim that Jane’s Defence weekly recently (in 2005) put the value of an F-22 at $151 million dollars U.S., rising to $200 million if upgrades to approach the F-35's air to ground targeting performance were included. At a projected price of $45 million U.S. (2003 dollars), the F-35 is three to four times cheaper than the F-22. Therefore, there would have to be a very significant cost blowout in the F-35 program for the F-22 to become better value for money.


Much of the F-35's software was developed in ] and ] ]s, while ] code from the F-22 was also used; the Block 3F software has 8.6&nbsp;million ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Robb |first=John H. |date=11 February 2001 |title=Hey C and C++ Can Be Used In Safety Critical Applications Too! |url=https://journal.thecsiac.com/issue/53/158 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130216212524/https://journal.thecsiac.com/issue/53/158 |archive-date=16 February 2013 |work=Journal of Cyber Security and Information Systems}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Warwick |first=Graham |date=7 June 2010 |title=Flight Tests Of Next F-35 Mission-System Block Underway |url=https://aviationweek.com/flight-tests-next-f-35-mission-system-block-underway |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084833/https://aviationweek.com/flight-tests-next-f-35-mission-system-block-underway |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=Aviation Week}}</ref> The ] ] ] (RTOS) runs on integrated core processors (ICPs); data networking includes the ] and ] buses.<ref>{{cite web |title=Raytheon Selects RACE++ Multicomputers for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter |url=http://embeddedstar.com/press/content/2004/2/embedded12722.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151027215847/http://embeddedstar.com/press/content/2004/2/embedded12722.html |archive-date=27 October 2015 |access-date=25 October 2015 |work=EmbeddedStar.com}}</ref><ref name="M&AE V21 I2 McHale">{{cite web |last=McHale |first=John |url=http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-2/news/news/f-35-joint-strike-fighter-leverages-cots-for-avionics-systems.html |title=F-35 Joint Strike Fighter leverages COTS for avionics systems |date=1 February 2010 |work=Military & Aerospace Electronics |publisher=PennWell Corporation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054632/http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-2/news/news/f-35-joint-strike-fighter-leverages-cots-for-avionics-systems.html |archive-date=21 September 2013 }}</ref> The avionics use ] (COTS) components when practical to make upgrades cheaper and more flexible; for example, to enable fleet software upgrades for the ] (SDR) systems.<ref name="avweek_20070205">{{cite news |title=The Electric Jet |first=E. H. |last=Philips |date=5 February 2007 |work=]}}</ref><ref name="avionics_20070601">{{cite web |last=Parker |first=Ian |date=1 June 2007 |title=Reducing Risk on the Joint Strike Fighter |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2007/06/01/reducing-risk-on-joint-strike-fighter/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2007/06/01/reducing-risk-on-joint-strike-fighter/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=8 July 2007 |work=Aviation Today}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Keller |first=John |date=16 June 2013 |title=Tens of thousands of Xilinx FPGAs to be supplied by Lockheed Martin for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter avionics |url=http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/articles/2013/06/ai-f35-fpgas.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112141325/http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/articles/2013/06/ai-f35-fpgas.html |archive-date=12 January 2014 |access-date=16 June 2013 |website=Intelligent Aerospace}}</ref> The mission systems software, particularly for sensor fusion, was one of the program's most difficult parts and responsible for substantial program delays.{{refn|In 2014, Michael Gilmore, Director of Operational Test & Evaluation, stated that "software development, integration in the contractor labs, and delivery of mature capability to flight test continued to be behind schedule."<ref>FY2013 DOD PROGRAMS F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)</ref>|group=N}}<ref>{{cite web |last=Reed |first=John |date=23 November 2010 |title=Schwartz Concerned About F-35A Delays |url=http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/11/23/schwartz-concerned-about-f-35a-delays/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101126155649/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/11/23/schwartz-concerned-about-f-35a-delays/ |archive-date=26 November 2010 |website=DoD Buzz}}</ref><ref name="sw_delay">{{cite web |last1=Lyle |first1=Amaani |date=6 March 2014 |title=Program executive officer describes F-35 progress |url=http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/473499/program-executive-officer-describes-f-35-progress.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/473499/program-executive-officer-describes-f-35-progress/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>
== Specifications (F-35 Joint Strike Fighter) ==
]
Some information is estimated.
===General Characteristics===
* '''Crew:''' 1
* '''Length:''' 50 ft 6 in (15.37 m)
* ''']:''' 35 ft 0 in (10.65 m)
* '''Height:''' 17 ft 4 in (5.28 m)
* '''Wing area:''' 459.6 ft² (42.7m²)
* '''Empty weight:''' 26,000 lb (12,000 kg)
* '''Loaded weight:''' 42,000 lb (19,000 kg)
* ''']:''' 50,000 lb (23,000 kg)
* '''Powerplant:''' 1× ] afterburning ], 37,100 lbf (165 kN)
** '''Secondary (High Performance)''', discontinued in current budget proposal<ref>Watson, Ian (22 Jan. 2006). . ''Business Online, UK'' Retrieved Feb. 08, 2006.</ref>: 1x ] afterburning turbofan 178 kN thrust
** '''Lift fan (STOVL):''' 1x Rolls-Royce Lift System in conjunction with either F135 or F136 power plant 18,000 lbf (80 kN) thrust) each


] ] radar antenna]]
===Performance===
The APG-81 radar uses electronic scanning for rapid beam agility and incorporates passive and active air-to-air modes, strike modes, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) capability, with multiple target ] at ranges in excess of {{cvt|80|nmi|km}}. The antenna is tilted backwards for stealth.<ref>{{cite web |title=APG-81 (F-35 Lightning II) |url=http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/f35aesaradar/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123033148/http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/f35aesaradar/ |archive-date=23 January 2013 |access-date=4 August 2007 |website=Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems}}</ref> Complementing the radar is the AAQ-37 DAS, which consists of six ] that provide all-aspect ] and target tracking; the DAS acts as a situational awareness infrared search-and-track (SAIRST) and gives the pilot spherical infrared and night-vision imagery on the helmet visor.<ref name="Distributed Aperture System">{{cite web |title=F-35 Distributed Aperture System (EO DAS) |url=http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/f35targeting/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100402082538/http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/f35targeting/ |archive-date=2 April 2010 |access-date=6 April 2010 |website=Northrop Grumman}}</ref> The ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare system has ten ] antennas embedded into the edges of the wing and tail for all-aspect ] (RWR). It also provides sensor fusion of radio frequency and infrared tracking functions, geolocation threat targeting, and ] countermeasures for self-defense against missiles. The electronic warfare system can detect and jam hostile radars.<ref name="mission_sys_design">{{cite journal |first1=Greg |last1=Lemons |first2=Karen |last2=Carrington |first3=Dr. Thomas |last3=Frey |first4=John |last4=Ledyard |url=https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/webt/F-35_Mission_Systems_Design_Development_and_Verification.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526141016/https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/webt/F-35_Mission_Systems_Design_Development_and_Verification.pdf |archive-date=2019-05-26 |url-status=live |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |title=F-35 Mission Systems Design, Development, and Verification |doi=10.2514/6.2018-3519 |date=24 June 2018 |isbn=978-1-62410-556-2 |s2cid=115841087 |access-date=1 February 2020}}</ref> The AAQ-40 EOTS is mounted behind a faceted low-observable window under the nose and performs laser targeting, forward-looking infrared (FLIR), and long range IRST functions.<ref>{{cite web |title=Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control: Joint Strike Fighter Electro-Optical Targeting System |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/JointStrikeFighterElectroOpticalTar/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090106235314/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/JointStrikeFighterElectroOpticalTar/ |archive-date=6 January 2009 |access-date=11 April 2008 |website=Lockheed Martin}}</ref> The ASQ-242 CNI suite uses a half dozen physical links, including the directional ] (MADL), for covert CNI functions.<ref>{{cite web |title=ASQ242 Datasheet |url=http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/F35Lightning/Documents/asq242_datasheet.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140223224844/http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/F35Lightning/Documents/asq242_datasheet.pdf |archive-date=23 February 2014 |website=Northrop Grumman}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-14/issue-5/features/special-report/f-35-jet-fighters-to-take-integrated-avionics-to-a-whole-new-level.html |title=F-35 jet fighters to take integrated avionics to a whole new level |date=1 May 2003 |work=Military & Aerospace Electronics |publisher=PennWell Corporation}}</ref> Through sensor fusion, information from radio frequency receivers and infrared sensors are combined to form a single tactical picture for the pilot. The all-aspect target direction and identification can be shared via MADL to other platforms ], while ] enables communication with older systems.<ref>{{cite web |date=27 July 2012 |title=Israel, US Negotiate $450 Million F-35I Avionic Enhancements |url=http://defense-update.com/20120727_israel-us-negotiate-450-million-f-35i-avionic-enhancements.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730093546/http://defense-update.com/20120727_israel-us-negotiate-450-million-f-35i-avionic-enhancements.html |archive-date=30 July 2012 |website=Defense Update}}</ref>
* ''']:''' ] 1.8 (1,200 mph, 2,000 km/h)
* ''']:''' Mach (mph, km/h)
* '''Range:''' 620 miles (1,000 km)
* ''']:''' 48,000 ft (15,000 m)
* ''']:''' 40,000 ft/min<ref>The exact statistic is ].</ref> (2,000 m/s)
* ''']:''' 91.4 lb/ft² (446 kg/m²)
* ''']:''' 0.63:1


The F-35 was designed to accept upgrades to its processors, sensors, and software over its lifespan. Technology Refresh 3, which includes a new core processor and a new cockpit display, is planned for Lot 15 aircraft.<ref>{{cite web |last=Donald |first=David |date=17 June 2019 |title=F-35 Looks to the Future |url=https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-06-17/f-35-looks-future |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001131126/https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-06-17/f-35-looks-future |archive-date=1 October 2023 |access-date=1 February 2020 |work=Aviation International News}}</ref> Lockheed Martin has offered the Advanced EOTS for the Block 4 configuration; the improved sensor fits into the same area as the baseline EOTS with minimal changes.<ref>{{cite web |last=Drew |first=James |date=10 September 2015 |title=Lockheed reveals Advanced EOTS targeting sensor for F-35 Block 4 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheed-reveals-advanced-eots-targeting-sensor-for-416631/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200225173917/https://www.flightglobal.com/lockheed-reveals-advanced-eots-targeting-sensor-for-f-35-block-4/118155.article |archive-date=25 February 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> In June 2018, Lockheed Martin picked Raytheon for improved DAS.<ref>{{cite web |last=Abbott |first=Rich |date=18 June 2018 |title=Raytheon Picked to Produce F-35 Sensor |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/06/18/raytheon-picked-produce-f-35-sensor/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320202056/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/06/18/raytheon-picked-produce-f-35-sensor/ |archive-date=20 March 2023 |work=Aviation Today}}</ref> The USAF has studied the potential for the F-35 to orchestrate attacks by ]s (UCAVs) via its sensors and communications equipment.<ref>{{cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |date=15 December 2014 |title=Pawlikowski On Air Force Offset Strategy: F-35s Flying Drone Fleets |url=http://breakingdefense.com/2014/12/pawlikowski-on-air-force-offset-strategy-f-35s-flying-drone-fleets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030602/https://breakingdefense.com/2014/12/pawlikowski-on-air-force-offset-strategy-f-35s-flying-drone-fleets/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=Breaking Defense}}</ref>
* '''Cost: (in millions US$):'''
**'''F-35A''': 45
**'''F-35B''': 60


A new radar called the ] is planned for Block 4 F-35s.<ref name="auto5">{{cite web |last1=Helfrich |first1=Emma |date=3 January 2023 |title=F-35 Will Get New Radar Under Massive Upgrade Initiative |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/f-35-will-get-new-radar-under-massive-upgrade-initiative |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240119132927/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/f-35-will-get-new-radar-under-massive-upgrade-initiative |archive-date=19 January 2024 |access-date=4 January 2023 |website=The Drive}}</ref> According to the JPO, the new radar will be compatible with all three major F-35 variants. However, it is unclear if older aircraft will be retrofitted with the new radar.<ref name="auto5"/>
===Armament===


===Stealth and signatures ===
* The F-35A will carry an internal ] 25 mmm cannon, mounted under a blister on the port intake dorsal surface, with 180 rounds of ammunition. The F-35B and F-35C will carry the same weapon in a removable pod mounted on the aircraft's centerline, with 220 rounds of ammunition.
]
* To allow the aircraft to carry ordnance while maintaining low observability, the F-35 has two internal weapons bays, each capable of carrying one ], ] or ] air-to-air missile, plus either one additional air-to-air missile or up to 2,000 lb (F-35A, F-35C) or 1,000 lb (F-35B) in air-to-ground stores, including but not limited to ] glide bombs (single weapon), ] anti-armor missiles (triple packs), ] guided bombs (single weapon), ] quad packs, and the ] cluster bombs (single weapon). The ] air-to-air missile is currently being adapted to fit inside the weapons bays and my be integrated into the F-35.
* In addition, the F-35 can carry weapons externally on six under-wing hardpoints. On the two innermost hardpoints on each wing, the F-35 may carry "outsize" weapons that do not fit in the weapons bays, including but not limited to the ] and ] cruise missiles and the ] anti-radiation missile, in addition to the available stores for internal carriage. On the outermost hardpoints, the F-35 will carry short-ranged air-to-air missiles (Sidewinder or ASRAAM).


Stealth is a key aspect of the F-35's design, and ] (RCS) is minimized through careful shaping of the airframe and the use of ]s (RAM); visible measures to reduce RCS include alignment of edges and continuous curvature of surfaces, serration of skin panels, and the masking of the engine face and turbine. Additionally, the F-35's diverterless supersonic inlet (DSI) uses a compression bump and forward-swept cowl rather than a ] or bleed system to divert the ] away from the inlet duct, eliminating the diverter cavity and further reducing radar signature.<ref name="dsi"/><ref>{{cite web |date=22 October 2012 |title=Fast History: Lockheed's Diverterless Supersonic Inlet Testbed F-16 |url=http://aviationintel.com/2012/10/22/fast-history-lockheeds-diverterless-supersonic-inlet-testbed-f-16/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130907000042/http://aviationintel.com/2012/10/22/fast-history-lockheeds-diverterless-supersonic-inlet-testbed-f-16/ |archive-date=7 September 2013 |website=Aviation Intel}}</ref> The RCS of the F-35 has been characterized as lower than a metal golf ball at certain frequencies and angles; in some conditions, the F-35 compares favorably to the F-22 in stealth.<ref>{{cite web |last=Tirpak |first=John A. |date=26 November 2014 |title=The F-35 on Final Approach |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/article/The-F-35-on-Final-Approach/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230625223245/https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/The-F-35-on-Final-Approach/ |archive-date=25 June 2023 |access-date=1 February 2020 |website=Air & Space Forces Magazine}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |date=11 March 2015 |title=Threat Data Biggest Worry For F-35A's IOC; But It 'Will Be On Time' |url=http://breakingdefense.com/2015/03/threat-data-biggest-worry-for-f-35as-ioc-but-it-will-be-on-time/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://breakingdefense.com/2015/03/threat-data-biggest-worry-for-f-35as-ioc-but-it-will-be-on-time/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=31 March 2015 |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |date=6 June 2014 |title=Gen. Mike Hostage On The F-35; No Growlers Needed When War Starts |url=http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230611220940/https://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/ |archive-date=11 June 2023 |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref> For maintainability, the F-35's stealth design took lessons from earlier stealth aircraft such as the F-22; the F-35's radar-absorbent fibermat skin is more durable and requires less maintenance than older topcoats.<ref name="Countermeasures"/> The aircraft also has reduced ] and ] as well as strict controls of radio frequency emitters to prevent their detection.<ref name="LockMart_Norway">{{cite web |title=USAF FY00 activity on the JSF |url=http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2000/airforce/00jsf.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723171357/http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2000/airforce/00jsf.html |archive-date=23 July 2011 |website=Director, Operational Test & Evaluation}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=April 2008 |title=Request for Binding Information Response to the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Defence |url=http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121012064324/http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf |archive-date=12 October 2012 |website=Lockheed Martin |via=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Capaccio |first=Tony |date=4 May 2011 |title=Lockheed Martin's F-35 Fighter Jet Passes Initial Stealth Hurdle |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-04/lockheed-martin-s-f-35-fighter-jet-passes-initial-stealth-hurdle.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150225084933/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-05-04/lockheed-martin-s-f-35-fighter-jet-passes-initial-stealth-hurdle |archive-date=25 February 2015 |work=Bloomberg |publisher=}}</ref> The F-35's stealth design is primarily focused on high-frequency ] wavelengths;<ref>{{cite news |date=14 June 2015 |title=F-35 – Beyond Stealth |url=http://defense-update.com/20150614_f35_beyond_stealth.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://defense-update.com/20150614_f35_beyond_stealth.html |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=5 April 2019 |website=Defense-Update}}</ref> ]s can spot stealthy aircraft due to ], but such radars are also conspicuous, susceptible to clutter, and lack precision.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359931.pdf |title=Environmental/Noise Effects on UHF/VHF UWB SAR |first1=James |last1=Ralston |first2=James |last2=Heagy |first3=Roger |last3=Sullivan |date=September 1998 |website=Defense Technical Information Center |access-date=2 January 2015 |archive-date=2 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150102110548/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359931.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Plopsky |first1=Guy |last2=Bozzato |first2=Fabrizio |date=21 August 2014 |title=The F-35 vs. The VHF Threat |url=https://thediplomat.com/2014/08/the-f-35-vs-the-vhf-threat/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606085147/https://thediplomat.com/2014/08/the-f-35-vs-the-vhf-threat/ |archive-date=6 June 2023 |work=The Diplomat}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Brewer |first1=Jeffrey |first2=Shawn |last2=Meadows |url=http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA529057 |title=Survivability of the Next Strike Fighter |page=23 |work=Aircraft Survivability: Susceptibility Reduction |publisher=Joint Aircraft Survivability Program Office |date=Summer 2006 |via=Defense Technical Information Center |access-date=22 November 2010 |archive-date=1 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121201031745/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA529057 }}</ref> To disguise its RCS, the aircraft can mount four ] reflectors.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lockie |first=Alex |date=5 May 2017 |title=This strange mod to the F-35 kills its stealth near Russian defenses – and there's good reason for that |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-luneberg-radar-cross-section-russia-estonia-2017-5 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231225174113/https://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-luneberg-radar-cross-section-russia-estonia-2017-5?r=US&IR=T |archive-date=25 December 2023 |work=Business Insider}}</ref>
===Other===
* Cost: (in millions US$):
**'''F-35A''': 45
**'''F-35B''': 60
**Costing as per Asia Pacific Defence Reporter, September 2005.
**'''F-35C''': 55
* First flight - X-35 demonstrator: 2000
* Expected first flight F-35A - September 2006
* In-service date: expected to be 2009 through 2012. The reason for this is that the A will be brought into service first followed by the B. The C will be in service in 2012.


Noise from the F-35 caused concerns in residential areas near potential bases for the aircraft, and residents near two such bases—], Arizona, and ] (AFB), Florida—requested environmental impact studies in 2008 and 2009 respectively.<ref name="Alaimo">{{cite news |last=Alaimo |first=Carol Ann |date=30 November 2008 |title=Noisy F-35 Still Without A Home |url=http://azstarnet.com/news/local/article_b8e6b612-1751-5554-8819-166f110f0f24.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407212924/https://tucson.com/news/local/article_b8e6b612-1751-5554-8819-166f110f0f24.html |archive-date=7 April 2023 |newspaper=]}}</ref> Although the noise levels, in decibels, were comparable to those of prior fighters such as the F-16, the F-35's ] is stronger—particularly at lower frequencies.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a526482.pdf |title=Report on Jet Engine Noise Reduction |work=Naval Research Advisory Committee |date=April 2009 |access-date=31 May 2022 |archive-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731051139/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a526482.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Subsequent surveys and studies have indicated that the noise of the F-35 was not perceptibly different from the F-16 and F/A-18E/F, though the greater low-frequency noise was noticeable for some observers.<ref>{{cite news |title=F-35 Acoustics Based on Edwards AFB Acoustics, Test |date=April 2009 |work=JSF Program Office & Lockheed Martin}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/f-35-f-16-noise-difference-small-netherlands-study-shows |title=F-35, F-16 noise difference small, Netherlands study shows |work=Aviation Week |date=31 May 2016 |url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Ledbetter |first=Stewart |date=31 May 2019 |title=Wonder no more: F-35 jet noise levels finally confirmed at BTV |url=https://www.mynbc5.com/article/wonder-no-more-f-35-jet-noise-levels-finally-confimed-at-btv/27684205 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529200203/https://www.mynbc5.com/article/wonder-no-more-f-35-jet-noise-levels-finally-confimed-at-btv/27684205 |archive-date=29 May 2023 |publisher=NBC News}}</ref>
===Manufacturing responsibilities===
* '''] (prime contractor)'''
** Final assembly
** Overall system integration
** Mission system
** Forward fuselage
** Wings


===Cockpit ===
* ''']'''
]
** ] (AESA) radar
** Center fuselage
** Weapons bay
** Arrestor gear


The ] was designed to give the pilot good situational awareness. The main display is a 20-by-8-inch (50 by 20&nbsp;cm) panoramic ], which shows flight instruments, stores management, CNI information, and integrated caution and warnings; the pilot can customize the arrangement of the information. Below the main display is a smaller stand-by display.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hensley |first=Senior Airman James |date=19 May 2015 |title=F-35 pilot training begins at Luke |url=https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/589143/f-35-pilot-training-begins-at-luke/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405180358/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/589143/f-35-pilot-training-begins-at-luke/ |archive-date=5 April 2023 |access-date=30 January 2020 |work=U.S. Air Force}}</ref> The cockpit has a ] developed by ].<ref name="voice">{{cite web |last=Schutte |first=John |date=10 October 2007 |title=Researchers fine-tune F-35 pilot-aircraft speech system |url=https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/154961/researchers-fine-tune-f-35-pilot-aircraft-speech-system/ |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122215732/https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/154961/researchers-fine-tune-f-35-pilot-aircraft-speech-system/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |website=U.S. Air Force Materiel Command |access-date=26 January 2024 }}</ref> The F-35 does not have a ]; instead, flight and combat information is displayed on the ] in a helmet-mounted display system (HMDS).<ref name="hdms">{{cite web |date=10 April 2007 |title=VSI's Helmet Mounted Display System flies on Joint Strike Fighter |url=http://www.rockwellcollins.com/news/page8813.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717090016/http://www3.rockwellcollins.com/news/page8813.html |archive-date=17 July 2011 |website=]}}</ref> The one-piece tinted canopy is hinged at the front and has an internal frame for structural strength. The ] US16E ] is launched by a twin-catapult system housed on side rails.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.org.uk/JSF-UK-Industry-Team/Martin-Baker.aspx |title=Martin-Baker |website=The JSF UK Industry Team |access-date=23 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081021165256/http://www.jsf.org.uk/JSF-UK-Industry-Team/Martin-Baker.aspx |archive-date=21 October 2008}}</ref> There is a right-hand ] and throttle ] system. For life support, an ] (OBOGS) is fitted and powered by the Integrated Power Package (IPP), with an auxiliary oxygen bottle and backup oxygen system for emergencies.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lowell |first=Capt. Jonathan |date=25 August 2019 |title=Keeping cool over Salt Lake |url=https://www.af.mil/News/Commentaries/Display/Article/1941943/keeping-cool-over-salt-lake/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230813032559/https://www.af.mil/News/Commentaries/Display/Article/1941943/keeping-cool-over-salt-lake/ |archive-date=13 August 2023 |access-date=30 January 2020 |work=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>
* ''']'''
** Aft fuselage and empennages
** Horizontal and vertical tails
** Crew life support and escape
** ] systems
** Fuel system
** Flight Control Software (FCS1)


]
==Media==
The Vision Systems International{{refn|Rockwell Collins and Elbit Systems formed the joint venture Vision Systems International (VSI), later renamed Collins Elbit Vision Systems (CEVS).|group=N}} helmet display is a key piece of the F-35's human-machine interface. Instead of the head-up display mounted atop the dashboard of earlier fighters, the HMDS puts flight and combat information on the helmet visor, allowing the pilot to see it no matter which way they are facing.<ref>{{cite web |last=Zazulia |first=Nick |date=24 August 2018 |title=F-35: Under the Helmet of the World's Most Advanced Fighter |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/08/24/f-35-helmet-worlds-advanced-fighter/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231227020601/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/08/24/f-35-helmet-worlds-advanced-fighter/ |archive-date=27 December 2023 |work=Avionics International}}</ref> Infrared and night vision imagery from the Distributed Aperture System can be displayed directly on the HMDS and enables the pilot to "see through" the aircraft. The HMDS allows an F-35 pilot to fire missiles at targets even when the nose of the aircraft is pointing elsewhere by cuing missile seekers at high angles off-boresight.<ref name="F-35_prog_brief_Sept2006" /><ref>{{cite web |author= |date=4 May 2009 |title=F-35 Distributed Aperture System EO DAS |url=https://www.youtube.com/user/F35JSFVideos |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091117144354/http://www.youtube.com/user/F35JSFVideos#play/uploads/7/CwvnhFgzIKI |archive-date=17 November 2009 |access-date=23 November 2009 |website=YouTube |publisher=F35JSFVideos |type=Video }}</ref> Each helmet costs $400,000.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Davenport |first1=Christian |date=1 April 2015 |title=Meet the most fascinating part of the F-35: The $400,000 helmet |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/04/01/meet-the-most-fascinating-part-of-the-f-35-the-400000-helmet/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150401192132/http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/04/01/meet-the-most-fascinating-part-of-the-f-35-the-400000-helmet/ |archive-date=1 April 2015 |access-date=2 August 2015 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref> The HMDS weighs more than traditional helmets, and there is concern that it can endanger lightweight pilots during ejection.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Seligman |first1=Lara |date=14 October 2015 |title=F-35's Heavier Helmet Complicates Ejection Risks |url=http://www.defensenews.com/story/breaking-news/2015/10/14/f-35s-heavier-helmet-complicates-ejection-risks/73922710/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20171117122108/https://www.defensenews.com/breaking-news/2015/10/14/usaf-acknowledges-expanded-risk-of-neck-damage-to-f-35-pilots/ |archive-date=17 November 2017 |website=Defense News}}</ref>
{{multi-video start}}
{{multi-video item|filename=F-35 compilation.ogg|title=F-35 flight (video)|description=F-35 flight, video of transition to VTOL configuration, hover, take off in STOVL configuration, in-flight re-fuelling, vertical hover and landing.|format=]}}
{{multi-video item|filename=F-35 gun.ogg|title=F-35 gun test (video)|description=Test firing of F-35 gun.|format=]}}
{{multi-video item|filename=F-35 verticle landing.ogg|title=F-35 vertical landing (video)|description=Vertical landing (video)|format=]}}
{{multi-video end}}


Due to the HMDS's vibration, jitter, night-vision and sensor display problems during development, Lockheed Martin and Elbit issued a draft specification in 2011 for an alternative HMDS based on the AN/AVS-9 ] goggles as backup, with BAE Systems chosen later that year.<ref>{{cite web |date=17 November 2011 |title=Lockheed Martin Awards F-35 Contract |url=http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2011/11/17/lockheed-martin-awards-f-35-contract/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120430225851/http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2011/11/17/lockheed-martin-awards-f-35-contract/ |archive-date=30 April 2012 |website=Zack's Investment Research}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Lockheed Weighs Alternate F-35 Helmet Display |first=Graham |last=Warwick |date=21 April 2011 |work=Aviation Week}}</ref> A cockpit redesign would be needed to adopt an alternative HMDS.<ref>{{cite web |last=Carey |first=Bill |date=15 February 2012 |title=BAE Drives Dual Approach To Fixing F-35 Helmet Display Issues |url=https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-02-15/bae-drives-dual-approach-fixing-f-35-helmet-display-issues |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230127233449/https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-02-15/bae-drives-dual-approach-fixing-f-35-helmet-display-issues |archive-date=27 January 2023 |access-date=16 February 2012 |website=Aviation International News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=10 October 2011 |title=Lockheed Martin Selects BAE Systems to Supply F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Helmet Display Solution |url=https://www.baesystems.com/en-uk/article/lockheed-martin-selects-bae-systems-to-supply-f-35-joint-strike-fighter--jsf--helmet-display-solution |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030609/https://www.baesystems.com/en-uk/article/lockheed-martin-selects-bae-systems-to-supply-f-35-joint-strike-fighter--jsf--helmet-display-solution |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=BAE Systems}}</ref> Following progress on the baseline helmet, development on the alternative HMDS was halted in October 2013.<ref name="C4WDefault-3692597">{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=10 October 2013 |title=F-35 JPO drops development of BAE alternative helmet |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/f-35-jpo-drops-development-of-bae-alternative-helmet-391623/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140429220250/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/f-35-jpo-drops-development-of-bae-alternative-helmet-391623/ |archive-date=29 April 2014 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Williams |first=Dan |date=30 October 2012 |title=Lockheed Cites Good Reports on Night Flights of F-35 Helmet |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/lockheed-fighter-helmet-idUSL5E8LUJ4320121030 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924171611/http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/30/lockheed-fighter-helmet-idUSL5E8LUJ4320121030 |archive-date=24 September 2015 |access-date=1 July 2017 |work=Reuters}}</ref> In 2016, the Gen 3 helmet with improved night vision camera, new liquid crystal displays, automated alignment and software enhancements was introduced with LRIP lot 7.<ref name="C4WDefault-3692597" />
== Further reading ==
* Spick, Mike (2002), ''The Illustrated Directory of Fighters''. Salamander ISBN 1-84065-384-1
* Kopp, Carlo; Goon, Peter, ''Australian Aviation'', .


===Armament ===
==Notes and references==
]
<div style="font-size: 85%">
<references/>
</div>


To preserve its stealth shaping, the F-35 has two internal ] each with two weapons stations. The two ] each can carry ordnance up to {{convert|2500|lb|kg|abbr=on}}, or {{convert|1500|lb|kg|abbr=on}} for the F-35B, while the two inboard stations carry air-to-air missiles. Air-to-surface weapons for the outboard station include the ] (JDAM), ] series of bombs, ] (JSOW), and ]s (]). The station can also carry multiple smaller munitions such as the ]s (SDB), ] SDB II, and ]; up to four SDBs can be carried per station for the F-35A and F-35C, and three for the F-35B.<ref>{{cite web |last=Eshel |first=Noam |date=25 August 2010 |title=Small Diameter Bomb II – GBU-53/B |url=https://defense-update.com/20100825_sdb_2.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230924111829/https://defense-update.com/20100825_sdb_2.html |archive-date=24 September 2023 |access-date=28 August 2010 |website=Defense Update}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=F-35B STOVL Variant |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35-variants/f-35b-stovl-variant.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090223163759/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35-variants/f-35b-stovl-variant.html |archive-date=23 February 2009 |access-date=25 November 2010 |website=Lockheed Martin}}</ref><ref name="mbda spear">{{cite web |date=9 June 2019 |title=Spear Capability 3 |url=https://www.mbda-systems.com/innovation/preparing-future-products-3/spear-capability-3/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230511040608/https://www.mbda-systems.com/innovation/preparing-future-products-3/spear-capability-3/ |archive-date=11 May 2023 |website=] Systems |quote=This new, F-35 Lightning II internal bay compatible, air-to-surface missile}}</ref> The F-35A achieved certification to carry the ] in October 2023.<ref name="B61_certified">{{cite web |last=Marrow |first=Michael |date=8 March 2024 |title=F-35A officially certified to carry nuclear bomb |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/exclusive-f-35a-officially-certified-to-carry-nuclear-bomb/ |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref> The inboard station can carry the ] and eventually the ]. Two compartments behind the weapons bays contain flares, ], and towed decoys.<ref>{{cite web |last=Keller |first=John |date=17 August 2018 |title=Navy asks BAE Systems to build T-1687/ALE-70(V) electronic warfare (EW) towed decoys for F-35 |url=https://www.militaryaerospace.com/unmanned/article/16726515/navy-asks-bae-systems-to-build-t1687ale70v-electronic-warfare-ew-towed-decoys-for-f35 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122210607/https://www.militaryaerospace.com/uncrewed/article/16726515/navy-asks-bae-systems-to-build-t-1687-ale-70v-electronic-warfare-ew-towed-decoys-for-f-35 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |work=Military Aerospace Electronics}}</ref>
==Related content==
{{commons|F-35 Joint Strike Fighter}}
{{aircontent|
|links=yes
|has sequence=yes
|has relations=no
|has lists=yes
|see also?=yes


] of the F-35A aircraft.]]
|sequence=
The aircraft can use six external weapons stations for missions that do not require stealth.<ref>Keijsper 2007, pp. 220, 239.</ref> The wingtip pylons each can carry an ] or ] and are canted outwards to reduce their radar cross-section.<ref name="UK_for_ASRAAM">{{cite web |last=Hewson |first=Robert |date=4 March 2008 |title=UK changes JSF configuration for ASRAAM |url=http://www.janes.com/products/janes/defence-security-report.aspx?ID=1065928225 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120916123905/http://www.janes.com/products/janes/defence-security-report.aspx?ID=1065928225 |archive-date=16 September 2012 |website=Jane's}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=MBDA Shows Off ASRAAM |first=Pierre |last=Tran |date=22 February 2008 |work=Defense News}}</ref> Additionally, each wing has a {{convert|5000|lb|kg|abbr=on}} inboard station and a {{convert|2500|lb|kg|abbr=on}} middle station, or {{convert|1500|lb|kg|abbr=on}} for F-35B. The external wing stations can carry large air-to-surface weapons that would not fit inside the weapons bays such as the ] (JASSM) or ] cruise missile. An air-to-air missile load of eight AIM-120s and two AIM-9s is possible using internal and external weapons stations; a configuration of six {{convert|2000|lb|kg|abbr=on}} bombs, two AIM-120s and two AIM-9s can also be arranged.<ref name="F-35_prog_brief_Sept2006">{{cite web |url=http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/AFA_Conf_-_JSF_Program_Brief_-_26_Sept_06.pdf |title=F-35 Program Brief |first=Brigadier General Charles R. |last=Davis |date=26 September 2006 |website=U.S. Air Force |via=Joint Strike Fighter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200725033118/https://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/AFA_Conf_-_JSF_Program_Brief_-_26_Sept_06.pdf |archive-date=25 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://es.is.itt.com/JSF%20Suite.htm |title=JSF Suite: BRU-67, BRU-68, LAU-147 – Carriage Systems: Pneumatic Actuated, Single Carriage |year=2009 |website=ITT.com}}{{dead link |date=November 2013}}</ref><ref name="JSFrange">{{cite web |url=http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2007targets/Day1/Davisday1.pdf |title=JSF Range & Airspace Requirements |first=Davis |last=Digger |date=30 October 2007 |website=Headquarters Air Combat Command |via=Defense Technical Information Center |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081219205327/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2007targets/Day1/Davisday1.pdf |archive-date=19 December 2008}}</ref> The F-35 is armed with a ] ] rotary cannon, a lighter four-barrel variant of the ].<ref name="Multimission pod"/> On the F-35A this is mounted internally near the left wing root with 182 rounds carried;{{citation needed|date=March 2024}} the gun is more effective against ground targets than the ] gun carried by other USAF fighters.{{dubious|date=March 2024}}{{citation needed|date=March 2024}} In 2020, a USAF report noted "unacceptable" accuracy problems with the GAU-22/A on the F-35A. These were due to "misalignments" in the gun's mount, which was also susceptible to cracking.<ref name="gun cracking">{{cite news |last1=Capaccio |first1=Tony |title=The Gun On the Air Force's F-35 Has 'Unacceptable' Accuracy |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/federal-contracting/f-35s-gun-that-cant-shoot-straight-adds-to-its-roster-of-flaws |access-date=25 March 2024 |work=Bloomberg |date=30 January 2020 |language=en}}</ref> These problems were resolved by 2024.<ref name="GAU-22/A resolved"/> The F-35B and F-35C have no internal gun and instead can use a ] multi-mission pod (MMP) carrying the GAU-22/A and 220 rounds; the pod is mounted on the centerline of the aircraft and shaped to reduce its radar cross-section.<ref name="Multimission pod">{{cite web |url=http://www.gdatp.com/Products/Gun_Systems/Aircraft/F-35.asp |title=F-35 gun system |website=General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606130602/http://www.gdatp.com/Products/Gun_Systems/Aircraft/F-35.asp |archive-date=6 June 2011}}{{cite web |url=http://www.gdatp.com/files/PDF/A118_GAU22.pdf |title=GAU-22/A |website=General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717135842/http://www.gdatp.com/files/PDF/A118_GAU22.pdf |archive-date=17 July 2011}} Retrieved 7 April 2011.</ref><ref>Keijsper 2007, p. 233.</ref>{{verify source|date=March 2024}} In lieu of the gun, the pod <!-- or the pod mount? --> can also be used for different equipment and purposes, such as ], ], or rear-facing tactical radar.<ref name="Multi-Mission_Pod">{{cite web |last=Donald |first=David |date=11 July 2012 |title=Terma Highlights F-35 Multi-Mission Pod |url=http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-07-11/terma-highlights-f-35-multi-mission-pod |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231011013150/https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-07-11/terma-highlights-f-35-multi-mission-pod |archive-date=11 October 2023 |website=Aviation International News}}</ref><ref name="f-16.net">{{cite web |last=Bolsøy |first=Bjørnar |date=17 September 2009 |title=F-35 Lightning II status and future prospects |url=http://www.f-16.net/news_article3837.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231228183621/https://www.f-16.net/f-35-news-article3837.html |archive-date=28 December 2023 |access-date=23 November 2009 |website=F-16.net}}{{unreliable source?|date=March 2024}}</ref> The pod was not susceptible to the accuracy issues that once plagued the gun on the F-35A variant,<ref name="gun cracking"/> though was apparently not problem-free.<ref name="GAU-22/A resolved">{{cite news |last1=Trevithick |first1=Joseph |title=F-35A's Beleaguered 25mm Cannon Is Finally "Effective" |url=https://www.twz.com/air/f-35as-beleaguered-25mm-cannon-is-finally-effective |access-date=25 March 2024 |work=The War Zone |date=22 March 2024 |language=en}}</ref>
] -
] -
] -
'''F-35'''
<br>
] -
] -
] -
'''X-35''' -
] -
] -
]


Lockheed Martin is developing a weapon rack called Sidekick that would enable the internal outboard station to carry two AIM-120s, thus increasing the internal air-to-air payload to six missiles, currently offered for Block 4.<ref>{{cite web |last=Everstine |first=Brian W. |date=17 June 2019 |title=Lockheed Looking at Extending the F-35's Range, Weapons Suite |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/lockheed-looking-at-extending-the-f-35s-range-weapons-suite/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230528182539/https://www.airandspaceforces.com/lockheed-looking-at-extending-the-f-35s-range-weapons-suite/ |archive-date=28 May 2023 |access-date=31 January 2020 |work=Air & Space Forces Magazine}}</ref><ref name=dec2010>Lake 2010, pp. 37–45.</ref> Block 4 will also have a rearranged hydraulic line and bracket to allow the F-35B to carry four SDBs per internal outboard station; integration of the MBDA ] is also planned.<ref name="clipped-fin">{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=17 September 2010 |title=MBDA reveals clipped-fin Meteor for F-35 |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/09/17/347416/picture-mbda-reveals-clipped-fin-meteor-for-f-35.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100921000829/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/09/17/347416/picture-mbda-reveals-clipped-fin-meteor-for-f-35.html |archive-date=21 September 2010 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Drew |first=James |date=25 February 2015 |title=F-35B Internal Weapons Bay Can't Fit Required Load of Small Diameter Bomb IIs |url=http://insidedefense.com/share/167668 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030604/https://insidedefense.com/share/167668 |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=Inside Defense.com}}</ref> The USAF and USN are planning to integrate the ] internally in the F-35A and F-35C.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.saffm.hq.af.mil/FM-Resources/Budget/Air-Force-Presidents-Budget-FY20/ |title=Air Force President's Budget FY20 |website=Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, Financial Management and Comptroller}}</ref> Norway and Australia are funding an adaptation of the ] (NSM) for the F-35; designated ] (JSM), two missiles can be carried internally with an additional four externally.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kongsberg.com/en/KOG/News/2009/June/0906JSMAndLockheedMartin.aspx |title=Important cooperative agreement with Lockheed Martin |date=9 June 2009 |website=Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120414183147/http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kog/news/2009/june/0906jsmandlockheedmartin/ |archive-date=14 April 2012}}</ref> Both hypersonic missiles and direct energy weapons such as ] are currently being considered as future upgrades; in 2024, Lockheed Martin disclosed its proposed ] hypersonic missile, which can be carried internally in the F-35A and C and externally on the B.<ref>{{cite press release |url=https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2024/mako-a-hypersonic-missile-thats-more-than-ready.html |title=A Hypersonic Missile That's More Than Ready |publisher=Lockheed Martin |date=22 July 2024}}</ref>{{refn|In 2002, ] weapons were reportedly being developed for the F-35.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20020708/aw32.htm |title=Lasers being developed for F-35 and AC-130 |first=David A. |last=Fulghum |date=8 July 2002 |website=Aviation Week and Space Technology |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040626050316/http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20020708/aw32.htm |archive-date=26 June 2004}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_military.jsp?view=story&id=news%2Fmasd0926.xml |title=Keeping cool a big challenge for JSF laser, Lockheed Martin says |first=Jefferson |last=Morris |date=26 September 2002 |website=Aerospace Daily |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040604124353/http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_military.jsp?view=story&id=news%2Fmasd0926.xml |archive-date=4 June 2004}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20020722/aw173.htm |title=Lasers, HPM weapons near operational status |first=David A. |last=Fulghum |date=22 July 2002 |website=Aviation Week and Space Technology |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040613094437/http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20020722/aw173.htm |archive-date=13 June 2004}}</ref>|group=N}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_05_20_2013_p24-579062.xml |title=High-Speed Strike Weapon To Build On X-51 Flight |last1=Norris |first1=Guy |date=20 May 2013 |website=Aviation Week |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130520230214/https://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=%2Farticle-xml%2FAW_05_20_2013_p24-579062.xml |archive-date=20 May 2013 }}</ref> Additionally, Lockheed Martin is studying integrating a ] that uses spectral beam combining multiple individual laser modules into a single high-power beam, which can be scaled to various levels.<ref>{{cite web |last=Drew |first=James |date=5 October 2015 |title=Lockheed considering laser weapon concepts for F-35 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheed-considering-laser-weapon-concepts-for-f-35-417416/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031095931/https://www.flightglobal.com/lockheed-considering-laser-weapon-concepts-for-f-35/118420.article |archive-date=31 October 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref>
|related=
*]


]
|similar aircraft=
The USAF plans for the F-35A to take up the ] (CAS) mission in contested environments; amid criticism that it is not as well suited as a dedicated attack platform, USAF chief of staff ] placed a focus on weapons for CAS sorties, including ], fragmentation rockets that shatter into individual projectiles before impact, and more compact ammunition for higher capacity gun pods.<ref>{{cite web |last=Parsons |first=Dan |date=15 February 2015 |title=USAF chief keeps sights on close air support mission |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usaf-chief-keeps-sights-on-close-air-support-mission-409070/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200220152500/https://www.flightglobal.com/usaf-chief-keeps-sights-on-close-air-support-mission/115925.article |archive-date=20 February 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> Fragmentary rocket warheads create greater effects than cannon shells as each rocket creates a "thousand-round burst", delivering more projectiles than a ] run.<ref>{{cite web |date=24 March 2015 |title=Long Road Ahead For Possible A-10 Follow-On |url=http://aviationweek.com/defense/long-road-ahead-possible-10-follow |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030605/https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/long-road-ahead-possible-10-follow |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=Aviation Week}}</ref>
*]


===Engine ===
|lists=
The aircraft is powered by a single ] low-bypass augmented turbofan with rated thrust of {{convert|28,000|lbf|kN|abbr=on|sigfig=3}} at military power and {{cvt|43000|lbf|kN|0}} with afterburner. Derived from the ] used by the F-22, the F135 has a larger fan and higher bypass ratio to increase subsonic thrust and ], and unlike the F119, is not optimized for ].<ref name="JSF-FAQ">{{cite web |title=Frequently Asked Questions about JSF |url=http://www.jsf.mil/contact/con_faqs.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100801043341/http://www.jsf.mil/contact/con_faqs.htm |archive-date=1 August 2010 |access-date=6 April 2010 |work=Joint Strike Fighter}}</ref> The engine contributes to the F-35's stealth by having a low-observable augmenter, or ], that incorporates fuel injectors into thick curved vanes; these vanes are covered by ceramic radar-absorbent materials and mask the turbine. The stealthy augmenter had problems with pressure pulsations, or "screech", at low altitude and high speed early in its development.<ref>{{cite web |last=Warwick |first=Graham |date=17 March 2011 |title=Screech, the F135 and the JSF Engine War |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPosto&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a261f21c4-19ea-40e0-a756-ed0491972939&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100321164415/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog |archive-date=21 March 2010 |website=Aviation Week |access-date=20 December 2017 }}</ref> The low-observable axisymmetric nozzle consists of 15 partially overlapping flaps that create a sawtooth pattern at the trailing edge, which reduces radar signature and creates shed vortices that reduce the infrared signature of the exhaust plume.<ref>{{cite web |last=Katz |first=Dan |date=7 July 2017 |title=The Physics And Techniques Of Infrared Stealth |url=https://aviationweek.com/defense/physics-and-techniques-infrared-stealth |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/physics-techniques-infrared-stealth |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=12 April 2019 |work=Aviation Week}}</ref> Due to the engine's large dimensions, the U.S. Navy had to modify its underway replenishment system to facilitate at-sea logistics support.<ref>{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=1 October 2012 |title=US Navy works through F-35C air-ship integration issues |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/us-navy-works-through-f-35c-air-ship-integration-issues/107272.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200202061512/https://www.flightglobal.com/us-navy-works-through-f-35c-air-ship-integration-issues/107272.article |archive-date=2 February 2020 |access-date=1 February 2020 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref> The F-35's Integrated Power Package (IPP) performs power and thermal management and integrates environment control, auxiliary power unit, engine starting, and other functions into a single system.<ref name="av_tech">{{cite journal |author1=Chris Wiegand |author2=Bruce A. Bullick |author3=Jeffrey A. Catt |author4=Jeffrey W. Hamstra |author5=Greg P. Walker |author6=Steve Wurth |date=13 August 2019 |title=F-35 Air Vehicle Technology Overview |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/5.9781624105678.0121.0160 |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) |series=Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics |volume=257 |pages=121–160 |doi=10.2514/5.9781624105678.0121.0160 |isbn=978-1-62410-566-1}}</ref>
* ]
* ]
* ]


] swivel nozzle, lift fan, and roll-control posts]]
|see also=
The F135-PW-600 variant for the F-35B incorporates the Shaft-Driven Lift Fan (SDLF) to allow ] operations. Designed by Lockheed Martin and developed by ], the SDLF, also known as the ], consists of the lift fan, drive shaft, two roll posts, and a "three-bearing swivel module" (3BSM). The ] features three ] resembling a short ] with ] bases. As the ] edges are rotated by motors, the nozzle swivels from being ] with the engine to being ]. The ] 3BSM nozzle allows the main engine exhaust to be deflected downward at the tail of the aircraft and is moved by a ] that uses pressurized fuel as the ].<ref>{{cite web |date=6 May 2011 |title=Custom tool to save weeks in F-35B test and evaluation |url=https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/17156 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122212956/https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/17156 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=1 March 2021 |website=U.S. Naval Air Systems Command}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Zolfagharifard |first=Ellie |date=28 March 2011 |title=Rolls-Royce's LiftSystem for the Joint Strike Fighter |url=http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/rolls-royces-liftsystem-for-the-joint-strike-fighter/1008008.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219050153/http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/rolls-royces-liftsystem-for-the-joint-strike-fighter/1008008.article |archive-date=19 December 2013 |access-date=18 April 2011 |magazine=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LiftSystem |url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/defence/products/combat_jets/rr_liftsystem.jsp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703204717/https://www.rolls-royce.com/products-and-services/defence/aerospace/combat-jets/rolls-royce-liftsystem.aspx |archive-date=3 July 2023 |access-date=23 November 2009 |website=Rolls-Royce}}</ref> Unlike the Harrier's ] engine that entirely uses direct engine thrust for lift, the F-35B's system augments the swivel nozzle's thrust with the lift fan; the fan is powered by the low-pressure turbine through a drive shaft when engaged with a clutch and placed near the front of the aircraft to provide a torque countering that of the 3BSM nozzle.<ref>{{cite news |title=Swivel nozzle VJ101D and VJ101E |date=20 June 2009 |work=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.robertcmason.com/textdocs/GermanVSTOLFighters.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131027005442/http://www.robertcmason.com/textdocs/GermanVSTOLFighters.pdf |archive-date=2013-10-27 |url-status=live |title=V/STOL Fighter Programs in Germany: 1956–1975 |first=Mike |last=Hirschberg |date=1 November 2000 |website=International Powered Lift Conference |via=robertcmason.com |page=50 |access-date=3 October 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.harrier.org.uk/technical/How_Hovers.htm |title=How the Harrier hovers |website=Harrier.org |access-date=16 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100707235558/http://www.harrier.org.uk/technical/How_Hovers.htm |archive-date=7 July 2010}}</ref> Roll control during slow flight is achieved by diverting unheated engine ] air through wing-mounted thrust nozzles called roll posts.<ref name="lift1">{{cite web |last=Kjelgaard |first=Chris |date=21 December 2007 |title=From Supersonic to Hover: How the F-35 Flies |url=http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/071221-how-f-35b-stovl-propulsion-system-works.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230926222554/https://www.space.com/4778-supersonic-hover-35-flies.html |archive-date=26 September 2023 |website=Space.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ingenia.org.uk/ingenia/issues/issue20/hutchinson.pdf |title=Going Vertical: Developing a STOVL system |first=John |last=Hutchinson |website=Ingenia.org.uk |access-date=23 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150720000027/http://www.ingenia.org.uk/ingenia/issues/issue20/hutchinson.pdf |archive-date=20 July 2015}}</ref>
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


An alternative engine, the ], was being developed in the 1990s and 2000s; originally, F-35 engines from Lot 6 onward were competitively tendered. Using technology from the ], the F136 was claimed to have a greater temperature margin than the F135 due to the higher mass flow design making full use of the inlet.<ref name="thrust_target"/><ref>{{cite web |date=16 June 2009 |title=GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team completes study for Netherlands |url=https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases-archive/yr-2009/fighter-engine-study-netherlands.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122213449/https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases-archive/yr-2009/fighter-engine-study-netherlands.aspx |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=23 November 2009 |website=Rolls-Royce plc}}</ref> The F136 was canceled in December 2011 due to lack of funding.<ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=11 June 2009 |title=Rolls-Royce: F136 survival is key for major F-35 engine upgrade |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/06/11/327771/rolls-royce-f136-survival-is-key-for-major-f-35-engine.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090614073945/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/06/11/327771/rolls-royce-f136-survival-is-key-for-major-f-35-engine.html |archive-date=14 June 2009 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=8450963&c=AME&s=AIR |title=GE, Rolls Royce Stop Funding F-35 Alt Engine |first=Dave |last=Majumdar |date=2 December 2011 |website=Defense News |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120729014307/http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=8450963&c=AME&s=AIR |archive-date=29 July 2012}}</ref>
|external links=

*
The F-35 is expected to receive propulsion upgrades over its lifecycle to adapt to emerging threats and enable additional capabilities. In 2016, the Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) was launched to develop and test adaptive cycle engines, with one major potential application being the re-engining of the F-35; in 2018, both GE and P&W were awarded contracts to develop {{cvt|45000|lbf|kN}} thrust class demonstrators, with the designations ] and ] respectively.<ref name="fg20180709">{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Steven |date=9 July 2018 |title=USAF starts work on defining adaptive engine for future fighter |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/usaf-starts-work-on-defining-adaptive-engine-for-future-fighter/128748.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200111172419/https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/usaf-starts-work-on-defining-adaptive-engine-for-future-fighter/128748.article |archive-date=11 January 2020 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref> In addition to potential re-engining, P&W is also developing improvements to the baseline F135; the Engine Core Upgrade (ECU) is an update to the power module, originally called Growth Option 1.0 and then Engine Enhancement Package, that improves engine thrust and fuel burn by 5% and bleed air cooling capacity by 50% to support Block 4.<ref>{{cite web |date=31 May 2017 |title=Pratt & Whitney Validates Growth Option for F135 Engine |url=https://www.prattwhitney.com/newsroom/news/2017/05/31/pratt-whitney-validates-growth-option-for-f135-engine |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122214019/https://www.prattwhitney.com/newsroom/news/2017/05/31/pratt-whitney-validates-growth-option-for-f135-engine |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=25 November 2017 |website=Pratt & Whitney}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Kjelgaard |first=Chris |date=15 June 2017 |title=P&W Outlines Three-step F135 Development Pathway |url=https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2017-06-15/pw-outlines-three-step-f135-development-pathway |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240120124138/https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2017-06-15/pw-outlines-three-step-f135-development-pathway |archive-date=20 January 2024 |access-date=11 January 2020 |work=Aviation International News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Steve |date=21 July 2020 |title=F-35 Propulsion Upgrade Moves Forward Despite Uncertainty |url=https://aviationweek.com/ad-week/f-35-propulsion-upgrade-moves-forward-despite-uncertainty |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084812/https://aviationweek.com/ad-week/f-35-propulsion-upgrade-moves-forward-despite-uncertainty |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=24 July 2021 |work=Aviation Week}}</ref> The F135 ECU was selected over AETP engines in 2023 to provide additional power and cooling for the F-35. Although GE had expected that the more revolutionary XA100 could enter service with the F-35A and C by 2027 and could be adapted for the F-35B, the increased cost and risk caused the USAF to choose the F135 ECU instead.<ref>{{cite news |last=Tirpak |first=John A. |date=5 November 2021 |title=Next-Generation Power for Air Force Fighters |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/article/next-generation-power-for-air-force-fighters/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015112238/https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/next-generation-power-for-air-force-fighters/ |archive-date=15 October 2023 |work=Air & Space Forces Magazine}}</ref><ref name="f35_pw_ecu_win"/>
*

*
===Maintenance and logistics ===
*
The F-35 is designed to require less maintenance than prior stealth aircraft. Some 95% of all field-replaceable parts are "one deep"—that is, nothing else needs to be removed to reach the desired part; for instance, the ejection seat can be replaced without removing the canopy. The F-35 has a fibermat radar-absorbent material (RAM) baked into the skin, which is more durable, easier to work with, and faster to cure than older RAM coatings; similar coatings are being considered for application on older stealth aircraft such as the F-22.<ref name="Countermeasures">{{cite web |last=Butler |first=Amy |date=17 May 2010 |title=New, Classified Stealth Concept Could Affect JSF Maintenance Costs |url=https://aviationweek.com/new-classified-stealth-concept-could-affect-jsf-maintenance-costs |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310075225/https://aviationweek.com/new-classified-stealth-concept-could-affect-jsf-maintenance-costs |archive-date=10 March 2021 |website=Aviation Week}}</ref><ref name="raptorroadmap2019">{{cite web |last=Zazulia |first=Nick |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/10/11/rejuvenating-raptor-roadmap-f-22-modernization/ |title=Rejuvenating the Raptor: Roadmap for F-22 Modernization |work=Avionics Today |date=11 October 2018 |access-date=15 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190216035441/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/10/11/rejuvenating-raptor-roadmap-f-22-modernization/ |archive-date=16 February 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=6 November 2012 |title=US Air Force praises early performance of Lockheed Martin F-35 |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/us-air-force-praises-early-performance-of-lockheed-martin-f-35-378578/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200220152443/https://www.flightglobal.com/us-air-force-praises-early-performance-of-lockheed-martin-f-35/107732.article |archive-date=20 February 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> Skin corrosion on the F-22 led to the F-35 using a less ]-inducing skin gap filler, fewer gaps in the airframe skin needing filler, and better drainage.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11171r.pdf |title=Defense Management: DOD Needs to Monitor and Assess Corrective Actions Resulting from Its Corrosion Study of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter |first=Jack E. |last=Edwards |date=16 December 2010 |website=] |access-date=17 December 2010 |archive-date=5 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805173946/https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11171r.pdf }}</ref> The flight control system uses ]s rather than traditional hydraulic systems; these controls can be powered by lithium-ion batteries in case of emergency.<ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=12 July 2010 |title=Farnborough: Lockheed encouraged by pace of F-35 testing |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/farnborough-lockheed-encouraged-by-pace-of-f-35-tes-343782/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212005937/https://www.flightglobal.com/farnborough-lockheed-encouraged-by-pace-of-f-35-testing/94276.article |archive-date=12 December 2019 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.aviationtoday.com/2013/07/23/li-ion-battery-in-production-for-f-35s/ |title=Li-Ion Battery in Production for F-35s |work=Avionics International |date=23 July 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200125091218/https://www.aviationtoday.com/2013/07/23/li-ion-battery-in-production-for-f-35s/ |archive-date=25 January 2020 |access-date=25 January 2020}}</ref> Commonality between variants led to the USMC's first aircraft maintenance Field Training Detachment, which applied USAF lessons to their F-35 operations.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hawkins |first=Dan |date=27 July 2012 |title=F-35 maintenance training spawns USMC's first air FTD |url=https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/110740/f-35-maintenance-training-spawns-usmcs-first-air-ftd/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084833/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/110740/f-35-maintenance-training-spawns-usmcs-first-air-ftd/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>
*

*
{{anchor|ALIS}}{{anchor|ODIN}}The F-35 was initially supported by a computerized maintenance management system named Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS). In concept, any F-35 can be serviced at any maintenance facility and all parts can be globally tracked and shared as needed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sldinfo.com/?p=18843 |title=F-35, Maintenance and the Challenge of Service Standardization |date=9 June 2011 |website=Second Line of Defense |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110704140548/http://www.sldinfo.com/?p=18843 |archive-date=4 July 2011}}</ref> Due to numerous problems,<ref name="55pctCapable">{{cite web |last1=Marrow |first1=Michael |title=Only 55 percent of F-35s mission capable, putting depot work in spotlight: GAO |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2023/09/only-55-percent-of-f-35s-mission-capable-putting-depot-work-in-spotlight-gao/ |website=Breaking Defense |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231217100514/https://breakingdefense.com/2023/09/only-55-percent-of-f-35s-mission-capable-putting-depot-work-in-spotlight-gao/ |archive-date=17 December 2023 |date=21 September 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> such as unreliable diagnoses, excessive connectivity requirements, and ], ALIS is being replaced by the cloud-based Operational Data Integrated Network (ODIN).<ref>{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=20 November 2012 |title=USMC finds workaround for cyber vulnerability on F-35 logistics system |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usmc-finds-workaround-for-cyber-vulnerability-on-f-35-logistics-system-379272/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212010122/https://www.flightglobal.com/usmc-finds-workaround-for-cyber-vulnerability-on-f-35-logistics-system/107935.article |archive-date=12 December 2019 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Tucker |first1=Patrick |date=8 January 2015 |title=The F-35 Has To Phone Texas Before Taking Off |url=http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/01/f-35-has-phone-texas-taking/102525/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/01/f-35-has-phone-texas-taking/102525/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |website=Defense One}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Host |first=Pat |date=22 January 2020 |title=Pentagon announces replacement for F-35's ALIS |url=https://www.janes.com/article/93861/pentagon-announces-replacement-for-f-35-s-alis |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200123213152/https://www.janes.com/article/93861/pentagon-announces-replacement-for-f-35-s-alis |archive-date=23 January 2020 |work=Jane's}}</ref> From September 2020, {{anchor|OBK}}ODIN base kits (OBKs)<ref name=paxTester/> were running ALIS software, as well as ODIN software, first at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Yuma, Arizona, then at Naval Air Station Lemoore, California, in support of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 125 on 16 July 2021, and then Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, in support of the 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron (TES) on 6 August 2021. In 2022, over a dozen more OBK sites will replace the ALIS's Standard Operating Unit unclassified (SOU-U) servers.<ref name= colin /> OBK performance is double that of ALIS.<ref name="dvids">{{Cite web |date=9 August 2021 |title=F-35 Joint Program Office begins deployment of new logistics hardware to F-35 squadrons |url=https://www.dvidshub.net/news/402674/f-35-joint-program-office-begins-deployment-new-logistics-hardware-f-35-squadrons |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084730/https://www.dvidshub.net/news/402674/f-35-joint-program-office-begins-deployment-new-logistics-hardware-f-35-squadrons |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=Defense Visual Information Distribution Service}}</ref><ref name="colin">{{Cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |date=13 August 2021 |title=ALIS Is Dying; Long Live F-35's ODIN |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2021/08/alis-is-dying-long-live-f-35s-odin/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015112012/https://breakingdefense.com/2021/08/alis-is-dying-long-live-f-35s-odin/ |archive-date=15 October 2023 |website=Breaking Defense}}</ref><ref name="paxTester">{{cite web |last1=Land |first1=Michael |title=F-35 testers recommend fielding logistics software update |url=https://www.dcmilitary.com/tester/tenant_profile/updated-f-35-logistics-information-system-software-improves-performance-for-warfighter/article_878dce96-f99a-5a5e-b503-2114cbee9fc6.html |website=DC Military |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084356/https://www.dcmilitary.com/tester/tenant_profile/updated-f-35-logistics-information-system-software-improves-performance-for-warfighter/article_878dce96-f99a-5a5e-b503-2114cbee9fc6.html |archive-date=10 October 2023 |language=en |date=29 July 2021 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
*

*
==Operational history==
*
===Testing ===
*
The first F-35A, AA-1, conducted its engine run in September 2006 and first flew on 15 December 2006.<ref name="jsf_engine_run">{{cite web |url=https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2006-09-20-Mighty-F-35-Lightning-II-Engine-Roars-to-Life |title=Mighty F-35 Lightning II Engine Roars to Life |date=20 September 2006 |website=Lockheed Martin}}</ref> Unlike all subsequent aircraft, AA-1 did not have the weight optimization from SWAT; consequently, it mainly tested subsystems common to subsequent aircraft, such as the propulsion, electrical system, and cockpit displays. This aircraft was retired from flight testing in December 2009 and was used for live-fire testing at ].<ref>{{cite report |title=Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011}}</ref>
*

]
The first F-35B, BF-1, flew on 11 June 2008, while the first weight-optimized F-35A and F-35C, AF-1 and CF-1, flew on 14 November 2009 and 6 June 2010 respectively. The F-35B's first hover was on 17 March 2010, followed by its first vertical landing the next day.<ref>{{cite web |last=Wolf |first=Jim |date=18 March 2010 |title=F-35 fighter makes first vertical landing |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSTRE62H4WF20100318 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084431/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSTRE62H4WF20100318 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=Reuters}}</ref> The F-35 Integrated Test Force (ITF) consisted of 18 aircraft at ] and ]. Nine aircraft at Edwards, five F-35As, three F-35Bs, and one F-35C, performed flight sciences testing such as F-35A ] expansion, flight loads, stores separation, as well as mission systems testing. The other nine aircraft at Patuxent River, five F-35Bs and four F-35Cs, were responsible for F-35B and C envelope expansion and STOVL and CV suitability testing. Additional carrier suitability testing was conducted at ] at ]. Two non-flying aircraft of each variant were used to test static loads and fatigue.<ref name="sdd_flt_test">{{cite journal |last1=Hudson |first1=Mary L. |last2=Glass |first2=Michael L. |last3=Tucker |first3=Lt Col Tucker |last4=Somers |first4=C. Eric |last5=Caldwell |first5=Robert C. |date=24 June 2018 |title=F-35 System Development and Demonstration Flight Testing at Edwards Air Force Base and Naval Air Station Patuxent River |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2018-3371 |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) |page=27 |doi=10.2514/6.2018-3371 |isbn=978-1-62410-556-2|s2cid=116177609 }}</ref> For testing avionics and mission systems, a modified ] with a duplication of the cockpit, the ] has been used.<ref name=dec2010 /> Field testing of the F-35's sensors were conducted during ] 2009 and 2011, serving as significant risk-reduction steps.<ref name="Branch25Jun09">{{cite web |url=http://www.jber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123156090 |title=Northern Edge fields new radar system |first= Ricardo |last=Branch |date=8 March 2012 |website=Northern Edge Joint Information Bureau |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131027014134/http://www.jber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123156090 |archive-date=27 October 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Saiki |first=Tracey |date=28 June 2011 |title=Continued testing of F-35 JSF sensors a success at Northern Edge 2011 |url=http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/112953/continued-testing-of-f-35-jsf-sensors-a-success-at-northern-edge-2011.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030602/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/112953/continued-testing-of-f-35-jsf-sensors-a-success-at-northern-edge-2011/ |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=18 April 2012 |website=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>

Flight tests revealed several serious deficiencies that required costly redesigns, caused delays, and resulted in several fleet-wide groundings. In 2011, the F-35C failed to catch the arresting wire in all eight landing tests; a redesigned tail hook was delivered two years later.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defensenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012301170010 |title=F-35C Tailhook Design Blamed for Landing Issues |first=Dave |last=Majumdar |date=17 January 2012 |website=Defense News |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102142244/http://www.defensenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012301170010 |archive-date=2 January 2013}}</ref><ref name="newhook">{{cite web |last1=Majumdar |first1=Dave |date=12 December 2013 |title=Lockheed: New Carrier Hook for F-35 |url=http://news.usni.org/2013/12/12/lockheed-new-carrier-hook-f-35 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030602/https://news.usni.org/2013/12/12/lockheed-new-carrier-hook-f-35 |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=12 December 2013 |website=U.S. Naval Institute}}</ref> By June 2009, many of the initial flight test targets had been accomplished but the program was behind schedule.<ref name="DTI">{{cite web |url=http://www.zinio.com/reader.jsp?issue=416083334 |title=Get out and fly |first=Bill |last=Sweetman |date=June 2009 |website=Defense Technology International |pages=43–44 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090818084354/http://www.zinio.com/reader.jsp?issue=416083334 |archive-date=18 August 2009}}</ref> Software and mission systems were among the biggest sources of delays for the program, with sensor fusion proving especially challenging.<ref name="sw_delay"/> In fatigue testing, the F-35B suffered several premature cracks, requiring a redesign of the structure.<ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=22 November 2010 |title=Fatigue cracks raise questions about key decision in F-35 redesign |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fatigue-cracks-raise-questions-about-key-decision-in-f-35-redesign/96988.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200203162438/https://www.flightglobal.com/fatigue-cracks-raise-questions-about-key-decision-in-f-35-redesign/96988.article |archive-date=3 February 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> A third non-flying F-35B is currently planned to test the redesigned structure. The F-35B and C also had problems with the horizontal tails suffering heat damage from prolonged afterburner use.{{refn|"Bubbling and blistering" of the horizontal tails and tail booms were observed once during flutter tests of the F-35B and C in late 2011; according to the program office, the problem has only occurred once despite numerous attempts to replicate it, and an improved spray-on coating has been implemented since as a mitigation measure. On 17 December 2019, the Pentagon program office closed the issue with no further actions planned, and instead is imposing a time limit on high-speed flight for the F-35B and C to reduce the risk of damaging the stealth coatings and antennas located on the back of the aircraft.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Insinna |first1=Valerie |last2=Larter |first2=David |name-list-style=amp |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2019/06/12/supersonic-speeds-could-cause-big-problems-for-the-f-35s-stealth-coating/ |title=Supersonic speeds could cause big problems for the F-35's stealth coatings |date=12 June 2019 |work=Defense News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020/04/24/the-pentagon-will-have-to-live-with-limits-on-f-35s-supersonic-flights/ |title=The Pentagon will have to live with limits on F-35's supersonic flights |first1=David B. |last1=Larter |first2=Valerie |last2=Insinna |first3=Aaron |last3=Mehta |name-list-style=amp |date=24 April 2020 |website=Defense News |language=en-US |access-date=25 April 2020}}</ref>|group=N}}<ref name="FY2019DOTE">{{cite web |url=https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2019/dod/2019f35jsf.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200205015532/https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2019/dod/2019f35jsf.pdf |archive-date=2020-02-05 |url-status=live |title=FY2019 DOT&E Report – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35) |year=2020 |website=dote.osd.mil}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Capaccio |first1=Tony |date=21 February 2014 |title=Lockheed F-35 for Marines Delayed as Test Exposes Cracks |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-21/lockheed-f-35-for-marines-delayed-as-test-exposes-cracks.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150714165713/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-21/lockheed-f-35-for-marines-delayed-as-test-exposes-cracks |archive-date=14 July 2015 |website=Bloomberg}}</ref> Early flight control laws had problems with "wing drop"{{refn|Wing drop is an uncommanded roll that can occur during high-g transsonic maneuvering.|group=N}} and also made the airplane sluggish, with high angles-of-attack tests in 2015 against an F-16 showing a lack of energy.<ref>{{cite report |url=https://www.scribd.com/document/270417729/F-35-High-AoA-Maneuvers |title=F-35A High Angle of Attack Operational Maneuvers |work=Lockheed Martin |date=14 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |date=19 July 2017 |title=Pilots Say F-35 Superior Within Visual Range: Dogfight Criticisms Laid To Rest |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2017/06/pilots-say-f-35-superior-within-visual-range-dogfight-criticisms-laid-to-rest/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226173836/https://breakingdefense.com/2017/06/pilots-say-f-35-superior-within-visual-range-dogfight-criticisms-laid-to-rest/ |archive-date=26 December 2022 |work=Breaking Defense}}</ref>

]
At-sea testing of the F-35B was first conducted aboard {{USS|Wasp|LHD-1|6}}. In October 2011, two F-35Bs conducted three weeks of initial sea trials, called Development Test I.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/18041 |title=F-35B completes first sea trials on USS Wasp |date=24 October 2011 |website=Naval Air Systems Command |access-date=17 July 2012 |archive-date=10 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310080222/https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/18041 }}</ref> The second F-35B sea trials, Development Test II, began in August 2013, with tests including nighttime operations; two aircraft completed 19 nighttime vertical landings using DAS imagery.<ref name="DTII">{{cite news |last=Shalal-Esa |first=Andrea |date=29 August 2013 |title=U.S. Marines see progress in F-35 testing despite challenges |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/lockheed-fighter-testing-idUSL2N0GU03Z20130829 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015230306/http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/29/lockheed-fighter-testing-idUSL2N0GU03Z20130829 |archive-date=15 October 2015 |access-date=1 July 2017 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://insidedefense.com/Inside-the-Navy/Inside-the-Navy-09/02/2013/f-35b-pilots-conduct-night-shipboard-landing-without-night-vision/menu-id-81.html |title=F-35B Pilots Conduct Night Shipboard Landing Without Night-Vision |date=9 February 2013 |website=Inside the Navy |publisher=Inside Washington Publishers |access-date=19 September 2013 }}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> The first operational testing involving six F-35Bs was done on the ''Wasp'' in May 2015. The final Development Test III on {{USS|America|LHA-6|6}} involving operations in high sea states was completed in late 2016.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://navalaviationnews.navylive.dodlive.mil/2017/03/14/f-35b-completes-at-sea-developmental-testing/ |title=F-35B Complete At-Sea Developmental Testing |date=14 March 2017 |work=Naval Aviation News |access-date=5 February 2020 |archive-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731044849/https://navalaviationnews.navylive.dodlive.mil/2017/03/14/f-35b-completes-at-sea-developmental-testing/ }}</ref> A Royal Navy F-35 conducted the first "rolling" landing on board {{HMS|Queen Elizabeth|R08|6}} in October 2018.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 October 2018 |title=Navy jets trial new 'rolling' landing |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-hampshire-45863698/navy-f-35-jet-trials-rolling-landing-on-aircraft-carrier |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407221200/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-hampshire-45863698 |archive-date=7 April 2023 |access-date=12 August 2019 |website=BBC News |language=en}}</ref>

]
After the redesigned tail hook arrived, the F-35C's carrier-based Development Test I began in November 2014 aboard {{USS|Nimitz}} and focused on basic day carrier operations and establishing launch and recovery handling procedures.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=84456 |title=F-35C Completes First Night Flight Aboard Aircraft Carrier |website=U.S. Navy |date=13 November 2014 |access-date=29 November 2014 |archive-date=10 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710034605/http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=84456 }}</ref> Development Test II, which focused on night operations, weapons loading, and full power launches, took place in October 2015. The final Development Test III was completed in August 2016, and included tests of asymmetric loads and certifying systems for landing qualifications and interoperability.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cavas |first=Christopher |date=17 August 2016 |title=F-35C Back at Sea for 3rd Round of Carrier Tests |url=https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2016/08/17/f-35c-back-at-sea-for-3rd-round-of-carrier-tests/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122121731/https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2016/08/17/f-35c-back-at-sea-for-3rd-round-of-carrier-tests/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |work=Defense News}}</ref> Operational test of the F-35C was conducted in 2018 and the first operational squadron achieved safe-for-flight milestone that December, paving the way for its introduction in 2019.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite web |last=Grady |first=John |date=11 October 2018 |title=Preliminary F-35C Feedback is Positive, As Formal Operational Testing Begins This Fall |url=https://news.usni.org/2018/10/11/navy-positive-after-early-f-35c-carrier-tests |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230321104403/https://news.usni.org/2018/10/11/navy-positive-after-early-f-35c-carrier-tests |archive-date=21 March 2023 |work=U.S. Naval Institute}}</ref>

The F-35's reliability and availability have fallen short of requirements, especially in the early years of testing. The ALIS maintenance and logistics system was plagued by excessive connectivity requirements and faulty diagnoses. In late 2017, the GAO reported the time needed to repair an F-35 part averaged 172 days, which was "twice the program's objective," and that shortage of spare parts was degrading readiness.<ref name="shortage">{{Cite news |last=Capaccio |first=Anthony |date=23 October 2017 |title=F-35s Hobbled by Parts Shortages, Slow Repairs, Audit Finds |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-23/f-35s-hobbled-by-parts-shortages-slow-repairs-audit-finds |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171023193457/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-23/f-35s-hobbled-by-parts-shortages-slow-repairs-audit-finds |archive-date=23 October 2017 |website=]}}</ref> In 2019, while individual F-35 units have achieved mission-capable rates of over the target of 80% for short periods during deployed operations, fleet-wide rates remained below target. The fleet availability goal of 65% was also not met, although the trend shows improvement. Internal gun accuracy of the F-35A was unacceptable until misalignment issues were addressed by 2024.<ref name="FY2019DOTE"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.defensenews.com/smr/hidden-troubles-f35/ |title=The Hidden Troubles of the F-35 |work=Defense News}}</ref> As of 2020, the number of the program's most serious issues have been decreased by half.<ref>{{cite news |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |date=24 April 2020 |title=The Pentagon has cut the number of serious F-35 technical flaws in half |url=https://www.defensenews.com/smr/hidden-troubles-f35/2020/04/24/the-pentagon-has-cut-the-number-of-serious-f-35-technical-flaws-in-half/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200427102408/https://www.defensenews.com/smr/hidden-troubles-f35/2020/04/24/the-pentagon-has-cut-the-number-of-serious-f-35-technical-flaws-in-half/ |archive-date=27 April 2020 |work=Defense News}}</ref><ref name="GAU-22/A resolved"/>

Operational test and evaluation (OT&E) with Block 3F, the final configuration for SDD, began in December 2018, but its completion was delayed particularly by technical problems in integration with the DOD's Joint Simulation Environment (JSE);<ref>{{cite web |url=https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/f-35-finally-can-use-all-its-weapons-combat |title=F-35 Finally Can Use All Its Weapons In Combat |date=5 March 2018 |website=Aviation Week |url-access=subscription}}</ref> the F-35 finally completed all JSE trials in September 2023.<ref name="F-35MilestoneC"/>

===United States===
====Training====
] at ].]]

The F-35A and F-35B were cleared for basic flight training in early 2012, although there were concerns over safety and performance due to lack of system maturity at the time.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123291745 |title=Air Force issues flight release for Eglin AFB F-35A |website=U.S. Air Force |date=28 February 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130802014635/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123291745 |archive-date=2 August 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-28/air-force-expands-f-35-trials-over-tester-s-objections |title=Air Force Expands F-35 Trials Over Tester's Objections |first=Tony |last=Capaccio |date=28 September 2012 |website=Bloomberg BusinessWeek |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130118154612/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-28/air-force-expands-f-35-trials-over-tester-s-objections |archive-date=18 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Clark |first=Colin |url=https://breakingdefense.com/documents/pentagons-testing-czar-questions-f-35-programs-ote-plan/ |title=Pentagon's Testing Czar Questions F-35 Program's OTE Plan |work=Breaking Defense |date=28 August 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120831025218/http://defense.aol.com/2012/08/28/pentagons-testing-czar-questions-f-35-programs-ote-plan/ |archive-date=31 August 2012}}</ref> During the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) phase, the three U.S. military services jointly developed tactics and procedures using flight simulators, testing effectiveness, discovering problems and refining design. On 10 September 2012, the USAF began an operational utility evaluation (OUE) of the F-35A, including logistical support, maintenance, personnel training, and pilot execution.<ref>{{cite web |last=Shalal-Esa |first=Andrea |date=10 September 2012 |title=More problems raised at Pentagon F-35 fighter review |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSBRE88A04A20120911 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084833/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSBRE88A04A20120911 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref name="C4WDefault-772940">{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=16 November 2012 |title=USAF unit completes F-35 OUE activity |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usaf-unit-completes-f-35-oue-activity-379117/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140525031901/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usaf-unit-completes-f-35-oue-activity-379117/ |archive-date=25 May 2014 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref>

], home of ], in September 2015.]]
The USMC F-35B ] (FRS) was initially based at Eglin AFB in 2012 alongside USAF F-35A training units, before moving to ] in 2014 while another FRS was stood up at ] in 2020.<ref>{{cite web |last=Shalal-Esa |first=Andrea |date=27 February 2012 |title=USMC Near Start of F-35 Training Flights |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/lockheed-fighter-idUSL2E8DP08Y20120225 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084729/https://www.reuters.com/article/lockheed-fighter-idUSL2E8DP08Y20120225 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=21 November 2012 |title=Simulation plays vital role in building F-35 tactics and aircraft development |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/simulation-plays-vital-role-in-building-f-35-tactics-and-aircraft-development-379336/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200915100520/https://www.flightglobal.com/simulation-plays-vital-role-in-building-f-35-tactics-and-aircraft-development/107958.article |archive-date=15 September 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> The USAF F-35A basic course is held at Eglin AFB and Luke AFB; in January 2013, training began at Eglin with capacity for 100 pilots and 2,100 maintainers at once.<ref name="pilot training">{{cite web |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2012/12/air-force-f35-pilot-training-starts-next-month-eglin-121712/ |title=F-35 pilot training starts next month at Eglin |first=Brian |last=Everstine |date=17 December 2012 |website=Military Times |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130310063124/http://militarytimes.com/news/2012/12/air-force-f35-pilot-training-starts-next-month-eglin-121712/ |archive-date=10 March 2013}}</ref> Additionally, the ] of the ] was activated at ] in June 2017 for F-35A weapons instructor curriculum while the ] was reactivated with the F-35A in June 2022 to expand training against adversary stealth aircraft tactics.<ref>{{cite web |date=9 June 2022 |title=65th Aggressor Squadron reactivates at Nellis with aggressor force of F-35s |url=https://www.nellis.af.mil/News/Article/3058572/65th-aggressor-squadron-reactivates-at-nellis-with-aggressor-force-of-f-35s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010124846/https://www.nellis.af.mil/News/Article/3058572/65th-aggressor-squadron-reactivates-at-nellis-with-aggressor-force-of-f-35s/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=U.S. Air Force}}</ref> The USN stood up its F-35C FRS in 2012 with ] at Eglin AFB, but operations would later be transferred and consolidated under ] at ] in 2019.<ref>{{cite web |last=Burgess |first=Richard R. |date=28 May 2019 |title=Navy Deactivates First F-35C Replacement Squadron, Merges With Second |url=https://seapowermagazine.org/navy-deactivates-first-f-35c-replacement-squadron-merges-with-second/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084732/https://seapowermagazine.org/navy-deactivates-first-f-35c-replacement-squadron-merges-with-second/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=Sea Power Magazine}}</ref> The F-35C was introduced to the Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor course, or ], in 2020 and the additional capabilities of the aircraft greatly revamped the course syllabus.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hunter |first=Jamie |date=10 July 2020 |title=How The F-35 Triggered Topgun's Biggest Syllabus Revamp In Nearly Four Decades |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34685/how-the-f-35-triggered-topguns-biggest-syllabus-revamp-in-nearly-four-decades |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084730/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34685/how-the-f-35-triggered-topguns-biggest-syllabus-revamp-in-nearly-four-decades |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=The Drive}}</ref>

====U.S. Marine Corps====
On 16 November 2012, the USMC received the first F-35B of ] at ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Reidinger |first=Staci |date=21 November 2012 |title=First Operational F-35 Squadron honored in historic ceremony |url=https://www.dvidshub.net/news/98226/first-operational-f-35-squadron-honored-historic-ceremony |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523024649/https://www.dvidshub.net/news/98226/first-operational-f-35-squadron-honored-historic-ceremony |archive-date=23 May 2023 |access-date=22 January 2024 |website=Defense Visual Information Distribution Service}}</ref> The USMC declared Initial Operational Capability (IOC) for the F-35B in the Block 2B configuration on 31 July 2015 after operational trials, with some limitations in night operations, mission systems, and weapons carriage.<ref name="USMC_IOC"/><ref>{{cite news |last=Davenport |first=Christian |date=15 September 2015 |title=Pentagon weapons tester calls F-35 evaluation into question |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/09/15/pentagon-weapons-tester-calls-f-35-evaluation-into-question |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150930085953/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/09/15/pentagon-weapons-tester-calls-f-35-evaluation-into-question/ |archive-date=30 September 2015 |newspaper=]}}</ref> USMC F-35Bs participated in their first Red Flag exercise in July 2016 with 67 sorties conducted.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bardo |first1=J. T. |date=1 August 2016 |title=Executive Summary of VMFA-121 Support of Red Flag 16-3 |url=https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3514589-Executive-Summary-of-VMFA-121-Support-of-Red.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190326164243/https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3514589-Executive-Summary-of-VMFA-121-Support-of-Red.html |archive-date=26 March 2019 |website=DocumentCloud |publisher=United States Marine Corps}}</ref> The first F-35B deployment occurred in 2017 at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan; combat employment began in July 2018 from the amphibious assault ship {{USS|Essex|LHD-2|6}}, with the first combat strike on 27 September 2018 against a ] target in Afghanistan.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ali |first1=Idrees |last2=Stone |first2=Mike |date=27 September 2018 |title=F-35 jet used by U.S. in combat for first time |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pentagon-f35/lockheed-f-35-jet-used-by-u-s-in-combat-for-first-time-official-idUSKCN1M72BT |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180927193931/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pentagon-f35/lockheed-f-35-jet-used-by-u-s-in-combat-for-first-time-official-idUSKCN1M72BT |archive-date=27 September 2018 |access-date=27 September 2018 |work=Reuters}}</ref>

In addition to deploying F-35Bs on amphibious assault ships, the USMC plans to disperse the aircraft among austere forward-deployed bases with shelter and concealment to enhance survivability while remaining close to a battlespace. Known as distributed STOVL operations (DSO), F-35Bs would operate from temporary bases in allied territory within hostile missile engagement zones and displace inside the enemy's 24- to 48-hour targeting cycle; this strategy allows F-35Bs to rapidly respond to operational needs, with mobile forward arming and refueling points (M-FARPs) accommodating ] and ] aircraft to rearm and refuel the jets, as well as littoral areas for sea links of mobile distribution sites. For higher echelons of maintenance, F-35Bs would return from M-FARPs to rear-area friendly bases or ships. Helicopter-portable metal planking is needed to protect unprepared roads from the F-35B's exhaust; the USMC are studying lighter heat-resistant options.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://aviationweek.com/defense/marines-propose-rapidly-mobile-f-35-operations |title=Marines Propose Rapidly Mobile F-35 Operations |date=16 December 2014 |website=Aviation Week |url-access=subscription}}</ref> These operations have become part of the larger USMC Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO) concept.<ref>{{cite web |last=Eckstein |first=Megan |date=23 April 2019 |title=Marines Folding F-35B into New Pacific Island-Hopping Concept |url=https://news.usni.org/2019/04/23/marines-folding-f-35b-into-new-pacific-island-hopping-concept |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231226202736/https://news.usni.org/2019/04/23/marines-folding-f-35b-into-new-pacific-island-hopping-concept |archive-date=26 December 2023 |work=U.S. Naval Institute}}</ref>

The first USMC F-35C squadron, ], achieved ] in July 2021 and was first deployed on board USS ''Abraham Lincoln'' as a part of Carrier Air Wing 9 in January 2022.<ref>{{cite web |last=Jennings |first=Gareth |date=6 January 2022 |title=USMC deploys F-35C for first time |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/usmc-deploys-f-35c-for-first-time |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118003432/https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/usmc-deploys-f-35c-for-first-time |archive-date=18 January 2024 |work=Janes}}</ref>

In 2024, Lt. Gen. Sami Sadat of Afghanistan described an operation using F-35Bs from {{USS|Essex|LHD-2|6}} which bombed a Taliban position through cloud cover. "The impact left on my soldiers was amazing. Like, whoa, you know, we have this technology," Sadat said. "But also the impact on the Taliban was quite crippling, because they have never seen Afghan forces move in the winter, and they have never seen planes that could bomb through the clouds."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Seck |first=Hope Hodge |date=2024-09-26 |title='Cool Birds': Afghan general describes awe of first F-35 encounter |url=https://www.militarytimes.com/news/2024/09/26/cool-birds-afghan-general-describes-awe-of-first-f-35-encounter/ |access-date=2024-09-29 |website=Military Times |language=en}}</ref>

On 9 November 2024 Marine F-35Cs carried out strikes on the ] in Yemen in the context of the ].<ref name=Trevithickyemen>{{cite news |last=Trevithick  |first=Joseph  |date=12 November 2024 |title=F-35C Naval Joint Strike Fighters Fly Combat Missions Against Houthis In Yemen |url=https://www.twz.com/air/f-35c-naval-joint-strike-fighters-fly-combat-missions-against-houthis-in-yemen |work=The War zone |access-date=13 November 2024}}</ref>

====U.S. Air Force====
USAF F-35A in the Block 3i configuration achieved IOC with the USAF's ] at ], ] on 2 August 2016.<ref name="defready aug16"/> F-35As conducted their first Red Flag exercise in 2017; system maturity had improved and the aircraft scored a kill ratio of 15:1 against an F-16 ] in a high-threat environment.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lockie |first=Alex |date=8 February 2017 |title=The F-35 slaughtered the competition in its latest test |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-slaughters-competition-red-flag-2017-2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210726061959/https://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-slaughters-competition-red-flag-2017-2?r=US&IR=T |archive-date=26 July 2021 |work=Business Insider}}</ref> The first USAF F-35A deployment occurred on 15 April 2019 to ], UAE.<ref>{{cite web |date=15 April 2019 |title=U.S. Air Force's F-35A Lightning II arrives for first Middle East deployment |url=https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Article/1813833/us-air-forces-f-35a-lightning-ii-arrives-for-first-middle-east-deployment/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230603073610/https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Article/1813833/us-air-forces-f-35a-lightning-ii-arrives-for-first-middle-east-deployment/ |archive-date=3 June 2023 |website=U.S. Air Forces Central}}</ref> On 27 April 2019, USAF F-35As were first used in combat in an airstrike on an ] tunnel network in northern Iraq.<ref name="usaf20190427">{{cite web |date=30 April 2019 |title=U.S. Air Force F-35As conduct first combat employment |url=https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1830712/us-air-force-f-35as-conduct-first-combat-employment/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240110193544/https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1830712/us-air-force-f-35as-conduct-first-combat-employment/ |archive-date=10 January 2024 |website=U.S. Air Force}}</ref>

For European basing, ] in the UK was chosen as the first installation to station two F-35A squadrons, with 48 aircraft adding to the ]'s existing ] and ] squadrons. The first aircraft of the 495th Fighter Squadron arrived on 15 December 2021.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hoyle |first=Craig |date=19 December 2021 |title=First European-based US Air Force F-35As arrive at Lakenheath home |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/first-european-based-us-air-force-f-35as-arrive-at-lakenheath-home/146903.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211219230233/https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/first-european-based-us-air-force-f-35as-arrive-at-lakenheath-home/146903.article |archive-date=19 December 2021 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref name="The Aviationist">{{cite web |last=Cenciotti |first=David |date=9 January 2015 |title=RAF Lakenheath was selected as the first base to host USAFE F-35s |url=http://theaviationist.com/2015/01/09/uk-base-selected-to-host-first-u-s-f-35-jets-in-europe/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230925073847/https://theaviationist.com/2015/01/09/uk-base-selected-to-host-first-u-s-f-35-jets-in-europe/ |archive-date=25 September 2023 |access-date=13 January 2015 |website=The Aviationist}}</ref>

The F-35's operating cost is higher than some older USAF tactical aircraft. In fiscal year 2018, the F-35A's cost per flight hour (CPFH) was $44,000, a number that was reduced to $35,000 in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cohen |first=Rachel S. |date=2 May 2019 |title=JPO Seeks to Slash F-35A Flight-Hour Costs |url=https://www.airandspaceforces.com/jpo-seeks-to-slash-f-35a-flight-hour-costs/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529195515/https://www.airandspaceforces.com/JPO-Seeks-to-Slash-F-35A-Flight-Hour-Costs/ |archive-date=29 May 2023 |website=Air & Space Forces Magazine}}</ref> For comparison, in 2015 the CPFH of the A-10 was $17,716; the F-15C, $41,921; and the F-16C, $22,514.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Thompson |first=Mark |date=2 April 2013 |title=Costly Flight Hours |url=https://nation.time.com/2013/04/02/costly-flight-hours/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240117065519/https://nation.time.com/2013/04/02/costly-flight-hours/ |archive-date=17 January 2024 |access-date=25 April 2020 |magazine=Time |language=en-US |issn=0040-781X}}</ref> Lockheed Martin hopes to reduce it to $25,000 by 2025 through performance-based logistics and other measures.<ref>{{cite web |last=Reim |first=Garrett |date=30 January 2020 |title=Lockheed Martin sees F-35 production rising to 180 units per year, despite high flying costs |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/lockheed-martin-sees-f-35-production-rising-to-180-units-per-year-despite-high-flying-costs/136455.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200131181733/https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/lockheed-martin-sees-f-35-production-rising-to-180-units-per-year-despite-high-flying-costs/136455.article |archive-date=31 January 2020 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref>

]

====U.S. Navy====
The USN achieved operational status with the F-35C in Block 3F on 28 February 2019.<ref name=":0" /> On 2 August 2021, the F-35C of ], as well as the ], embarked on their maiden deployments as part of Carrier Air Wing 2 on board {{USS|Carl Vinson}}.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 August 2021 |title=Thousands of sailors deploy with USS Carl Vinson strike group |url=https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/sailors-aboard-uss-carl-vinson-set-to-leave-san-diego-for-deployment/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240106232948/https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/sailors-aboard-uss-carl-vinson-set-to-leave-san-diego-for-deployment/ |archive-date=6 January 2024 |website=FOX 5 San Diego}}</ref>

===United Kingdom===
] landing on HMS ''Queen Elizabeth'', 2019|alt=|left]]

The United Kingdom's ] and Royal Navy operate the F-35B. Called Lightning in British service,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.raf.mod.uk/aircraft/f-35b-lightning/ |title=F-35B Lightning |website=Royal Air Force |access-date=30 August 2019}}</ref> it has replaced the ], retired in 2010, and ], retired in 2019. The F-35 is to be Britain's primary strike aircraft for the next three decades. One of the Royal Navy's requirements was a ] (SRVL) mode to increase maximum landing weight by using wing lift during landing.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nao.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docId=c02da1c8-320b-4062-881d-2c24482459b5&version=-1 |title=Major Projects Report 2008 |website=Ministry of Defence |access-date=23 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120807073545/http://www.nao.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docId=c02da1c8-320b-4062-881d-2c24482459b5&version=-1 |archive-date=7 August 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=15 June 2007 |title=US Marines eye UK JSF shipborne technique |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/06/15/214672/us-marines-eye-uk-jsf-shipborne-technique.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120730180149/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/06/15/214672/us-marines-eye-uk-jsf-shipborne-technique.html |archive-date=30 July 2012 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> Like the Italian Navy, British F-35Bs use ]s to fly from their aircraft carriers, HMS ''Queen Elizabeth'' and {{HMS|Prince of Wales|R09|6}}. British F-35Bs are not intended to use the Brimstone 2 missile.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 January 2017 |title=Military Aircraft: Written question – 60456 |url=http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2017-01-17/60456/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030603/https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2017-01-17/60456 |archive-date=18 October 2023 |access-date=4 July 2017 |website=UK Parliament |language=en}}</ref> In July 2013, ] Air Chief Marshal ] announced that ] would be the RAF's first operational F-35 squadron.<ref name="at19j13">{{cite news |date=19 July 2013 |title=Royal Air Force's No. 617 Squadron to fly F-35B fighter |url=http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsroyal-air-forces-no-617-squadron-to-fly-f-35b-fighter |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407040614/https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsroyal-air-forces-no-617-squadron-to-fly-f-35b-fighter/ |archive-date=7 April 2023 |newspaper=Airforce Technology}}</ref><ref name="gov18j13">{{cite news |date=18 July 2013 |title=Dambusters to be first Lightning II squadron |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dambusters-to-be-first-lightning-ii-squadron |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118104857/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dambusters-to-be-first-lightning-ii-squadron |archive-date=18 January 2024 |website=Ministry of Defence}}</ref>

The first British F-35 squadron was ] (TES), which stood up on 12 April 2013 as the plane's ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafconingsby/newsweather/index.cfm?storyid=F49C9161-5056-A318-A822347F24474925 |title=17 Squadron Standard Parade |website=Royal Air Force |date=12 April 2013 |access-date=25 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130828174416/http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafconingsby/newsweather/index.cfm?storyid=F49C9161-5056-A318-A822347F24474925 |archive-date=28 August 2013}}</ref> By June 2013, the RAF had received three F-35s of the 48 on order, initially based at Eglin Air Force Base.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/third-joint-strike-fighter-for-the-uk-arrives-28062013 |title=Third Joint Strike Fighter for the UK arrives |website=Royal Air Force |date=28 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130701061803/http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/third-joint-strike-fighter-for-the-uk-arrives-28062013 |archive-date=1 July 2013 }}</ref> In June 2015, the F-35B undertook its first launch from a ski-jump at NAS Patuxent River.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2015/june/25/150625-f35-ski-ramp |title=Navy's new F-35 jump jet flies from trademark ski ramp for first time |website=Royal Navy |date=25 June 2015 |access-date=6 July 2015 |archive-date=7 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150707022325/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2015/june/25/150625-f35-ski-ramp }}</ref> On 5 July 2017, it was announced the second UK-based RAF squadron would be ],<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/identity-of-f35-lightning-training-squadron-announced-05072017/ |title=Identity of F-35 Lightning Training Squadron Announced |website=Royal Air Force |date=5 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170728213241/https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/identity-of-f35-lightning-training-squadron-announced-05072017/ |archive-date=28 July 2017}}</ref> which reformed on 1 August 2019 as the Lightning ].<ref>{{cite web |date=17 July 2019 |title=Second Lightning Fight Jet Squadron Arrives In UK |url=https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/second-lightning-fighter-jet-squadron-arrives-in-uk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405205625/https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/second-lightning-fighter-jet-squadron-arrives-in-uk/ |archive-date=5 April 2023 |access-date=25 January 2020 |website=Royal Air Force}}</ref> No. 617 Squadron reformed on 18 April 2018 during a ceremony in Washington, D.C., becoming the first RAF front-line squadron to operate the type;<ref>{{cite web |date=18 April 2018 |title=RAF's legendary Dambusters squadron reforms to fly F-35 jets |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rafs-legendary-dambusters-squadron-reforms-to-fly-f-35-jets |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406064329/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rafs-legendary-dambusters-squadron-reforms-to-fly-f-35-jets |archive-date=6 April 2023 |website=Ministry of Defence}}</ref> receiving its first four F-35Bs on 6 June, flying from MCAS Beaufort to ].<ref>{{cite web |date=6 June 2018 |title=Britain's most advanced jets touch down on home soil |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britains-most-advanced-jets-touch-down-on-home-soil |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230713012021/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britains-most-advanced-jets-touch-down-on-home-soil |archive-date=13 July 2023 |website=Ministry of Defence}}</ref> On 10 January 2019, No. 617 Squadron and its F-35s were declared combat-ready.<ref>{{cite news |first=Dominic |last=Nicholls |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/10/new-raf-jet-combat-ready-face-resurgent-russia-threat/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/10/new-raf-jet-combat-ready-face-resurgent-russia-threat/ |archive-date=10 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=New RAF jet 'combat ready' in face of resurgent Russia threat |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |location=London |date=10 January 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref>

April 2019 saw the first overseas deployment of a UK F-35 squadron when No. 617 Squadron went to ], ].<ref>{{cite web |date=8 April 2019 |title=UK's most advanced jets deploy overseas for the first time |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uks-most-advanced-jets-deploy-overseas-for-the-first-time |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240110193922/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uks-most-advanced-jets-deploy-overseas-for-the-first-time |archive-date=10 January 2024 |website=Ministry of Defence}}</ref> This reportedly led on 25 June 2019 to the first combat use of an RAF F-35B: an armed reconnaissance flight searching for Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2019 |title=F-35 fighter jets join fight against IS |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48745027 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405101607/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48745027 |archive-date=5 April 2023 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> In October 2019, ''the Dambusters'' and No. 17 TES F-35s were embarked on HMS ''Queen Elizabeth'' for the first time.<ref>{{cite web |date=13 October 2019 |title=First UK fighter jets land onboard HMS Queen Elizabeth |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-uk-fighter-jets-land-onboard-hms-queen-elizabeth |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118112737/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-uk-fighter-jets-land-onboard-hms-queen-elizabeth |archive-date=18 January 2024 |work=Ministry of Defence}}</ref> No. 617 Squadron departed RAF Marham on 22 January 2020 for their first ] with the Lightning.<ref>{{cite web |date=22 January 2020 |title=F-35 Lightnings depart for Exercise RED FLAG in USA |url=https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/f-35-lightnings-depart-for-exercise-red-flag-in-usa/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084814/https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/f-35-lightnings-depart-for-exercise-red-flag-in-usa/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=25 January 2020 |website=Royal Air Force}}</ref> As of November 2022, 26 F-35Bs were based in the United Kingdom (with 617 and 207 Squadrons) and a further three were permanently based in the United States (with 17 Squadron) for testing and evaluation purposes.<ref name="auto4">{{Cite web |last=Allison |first=George |date=21 November 2022 |title=Britain takes delivery of more F-35 jets |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britain-takes-delivery-of-more-f-35-jets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410215109/https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britain-takes-delivery-of-more-f-35-jets/ |archive-date=10 April 2023 |website=UK Defence Journal}}</ref>

The UK's second operational squadron is the ]'s ], which stood up in December 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 2023 |title=809 Squadron Stood Up |url=https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2023/december/08/20231208-phoenix-rising-iconic-naval-unit-re-born-as-uks-second-front-line-f-35-squadron}}</ref><ref name="Royal Navy">{{cite web |date=9 September 2013 |title=Immortal air squadron to fly Royal Navy's newest jets |url=https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2013/september/09/130909-809-air-squadron |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20201001170003/https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2013/september/09/130909-809-air-squadron |archive-date=1 October 2020 |access-date=21 March 2015 |work=Royal Navy |via=National Archives}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hunter |first=Jamie |date=15 March 2021 |title=Top British F-35 Pilot On How His Fledgling Team Is Forging Its Own Path Forward |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39690/top-british-f-35b-pilot-on-how-his-fledgling-team-is-forging-its-own-path-forward |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084833/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39690/top-british-f-35b-pilot-on-how-his-fledgling-team-is-forging-its-own-path-forward |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=The Drive}}</ref>

=== Australia ===
] in 2023]]

Australia's first F-35, designated A35-001, was manufactured in 2014, with flight training provided through international Pilot Training Centre (PTC) at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=12 June 2020 |title=RAAF F-35s achieve 1,000 flying hour milestone |url=https://australianaviation.com.au/2020/06/raaf-f-35s-achieve-1000-flying-hour-milestone-84018/ |url-access=subscription |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084350/https://australianaviation.com.au/2020/06/raaf-f-35s-achieve-1000-flying-hour-milestone-84018/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=21 April 2021 |website=Australian Aviation |language=en-AU}}</ref> The first two F-35s were unveiled to the Australian public on 3 March 2017 at the ].<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Wroe |first=David |date=3 March 2017 |title=Joint Strike Fighters: Australian military stealth unveiled at Avalon Airshow |url=https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/joint-strike-fighters-australian-military-stealth-unveiled-at-avalon-airshow-20170303-guq1w3.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084758/https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/joint-strike-fighters-australian-military-stealth-unveiled-at-avalon-airshow-20170303-guq1w3.html |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=21 April 2021 |website=The Sydney Morning Herald |language=en}}</ref> By 2021, the ] had accepted 26 F-35As, with nine in the US and 17 operating at No 3 Squadron and No 2 Operational Conversion Unit at ].<ref name=":5" /> With 41 trained RAAF pilots and 225 trained technicians for maintenance, the fleet was declared ready to deploy on operations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 February 2021 |title=PM's landing at Williamtown |url=https://www.portstephensexaminer.com.au/story/7118610/pms-landing-at-williamtown/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084813/https://www.portstephensexaminer.com.au/story/7118610/pms-landing-at-williamtown/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=21 April 2021 |website=Port Stephens Examiner |language=en-AU}}</ref> It was originally expected that Australia would receive all 72 F-35s by 2023.<ref name=":6" /> Its final nine aircraft, which were the TR-3 version, arrived in Australia in December 2024.<ref name="DefenceJSFDec2024">{{cite press release |title=Final F-35A aircraft delivered |url=https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2024-12-19/final-f-35a-aircraft-delivered |website=] |access-date=20 December 2024 |date=19 December 2024}}</ref>

=== Israel ===
The Israeli Air Force (IAF) declared the F-35 operationally capable on 6 December 2017.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.f35.com/news/detail/israel-declares-f-35i-adir-combat-capable |title=Israel Declares F-35I Adir Combat Capable |website=F-35 Lightning II |access-date=9 December 2017 |archive-date=26 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926042134/https://f35.com/news/detail/israel-declares-f-35i-adir-combat-capable }}</ref> According to Kuwaiti newspaper ''Al Jarida'', in July 2018, a test mission of at least three IAF F-35s flew to Iran's capital ] and back to ]. While publicly unconfirmed, regional leaders acted on the report; Iran's supreme leader ] reportedly fired the air force chief and commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps over the mission.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Novak |first=Jake |date=18 July 2019 |title=The F-35 has already freaked out Iran and changed everything in the Middle East |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/18/f-35-has-freaked-out-iran-and-changed-everything-in-the-middle-east.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226173816/https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/18/f-35-has-freaked-out-iran-and-changed-everything-in-the-middle-east.html |archive-date=26 December 2022 |publisher=CNBC}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Okbi |first1=Yasser |last2=Hashavua |first2=Maariv |date=29 March 2018 |title=Report: Israeli stealth fighters fly over Iran |url=https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Report-Israeli-stealth-fighters-fly-over-Iran-547421 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180329193758/http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Report-Israeli-stealth-fighters-fly-over-Iran-547421 |archive-date=29 March 2018 |newspaper=The Jerusalem Post}}</ref>

On 22 May 2018, IAF chief ] said that the service had employed their F-35Is in two attacks on two battle fronts, marking the first combat operation of an F-35 by any country.<ref name="first strike" /><ref>{{cite web |last=Williams |first=Dan |date=22 May 2018 |title=Israel says it is the first country to use U.S.-made F-35 in combat |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-f35-israel/israel-says-it-is-the-first-country-to-use-u-s-made-f-35-in-combat-idUSKCN1IN0ON |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231106182337/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-f35-israel/israel-says-it-is-the-first-country-to-use-u-s-made-f-35-in-combat-idUSKCN1IN0ON |archive-date=6 November 2023 |work=Reuters}}</ref> Norkin said it had been flown "all over the Middle East", and showed photos of an F-35I flying over ] in daylight.<ref>{{cite news |last=Kubovich |first=Yaniv |date=23 May 2018 |title=A Message of Superiority: This Is the Israeli Army's Photo of an F-35 Over Beirut |url=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/this-is-the-israeli-army-s-photo-of-an-f-35-over-beirut-1.6114446 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221207160641/https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2018-05-24/ty-article/this-is-the-israeli-armys-photo-of-an-f-35-over-beirut/0000017f-df97-df7c-a5ff-dffffe6c0000 |archive-date=7 December 2022 |newspaper=]}}</ref> In July 2019, Israel expanded its strikes against Iranian missile shipments; IAF F-35Is allegedly struck Iranian targets in Iraq twice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bachner |first=Michael |date=30 July 2019 |title=Israel said to hit Iranian sites in Iraq, expanding strikes on missile shipments |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-to-hit-iranian-sites-in-iraq-expanding-strikes-on-missile-shipments/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509125011/https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-to-hit-iranian-sites-in-iraq-expanding-strikes-on-missile-shipments/ |archive-date=9 May 2023 |website=]}}</ref>

In November 2020, the IAF announced the delivery of a unique F-35I ] among a delivery of four aircraft received in August, to be used to test and integrate Israeli-produced weapons and electronic systems on F-35s received later. This is the only example of a testbed F-35 delivered to a non-US air force.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Trevithick |first1=Joseph |date=25 May 2017 |title=Israel Is Getting A Single F-35 Test Jet Unlike Any Other |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/10665/israel-is-getting-a-single-f-35-test-jet-unlike-any-other |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231106195239/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/10665/israel-is-getting-a-single-f-35-test-jet-unlike-any-other |archive-date=6 November 2023 |access-date=7 January 2021 |website=The Drive}}</ref><ref name="IsraelF35i">{{cite web |last1=Jennings |first1=Gareth |date=12 November 2020 |title=Israel receives F-35I testbed to develop national capabilities |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/israel-receives-f-35i-testbed-to-develop-national-capabilities |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231019154221/https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/israel-receives-f-35i-testbed-to-develop-national-capabilities |archive-date=19 October 2023 |access-date=7 January 2021 |website=Jane's}}</ref>

On 11 May 2021, eight IAF F-35Is took part in an attack on 150 targets in Hamas' rocket array, including 50–70 launch pits in the northern ], as part of ].<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.idf.il/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/2021/%D7%9E%D7%91%D7%A6%D7%A2-%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A8-%D7%94%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%96%D7%94-%D7%AA%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9D-1105/ |title= מבצע "שומר החומות" – סיכום 11.05 |access-date= 7 November 2021 |work= idf.il |date= 11 May 2021 |language=he |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211001123637/https://www.idf.il/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/2021/%D7%9E%D7%91%D7%A6%D7%A2-%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A8-%D7%94%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%96%D7%94-%D7%AA%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9D-1105/ |archive-date= 1 October 2021 |url-status= live}}</ref>

On 6 March 2022, the IDF stated that on 15 March 2021, F-35Is shot down two Iranian ]s carrying weapons to the Gaza Strip.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Zitun |first=Yoav |date=6 March 2022 |title=Israel shot down Iranian drones en route to Gaza, IDF says |url=https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b1rlwofb9 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107080457/https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b1rlwofb9 |archive-date=7 November 2023 |website=Ynetnews}}</ref> This was the first operational shoot down and interception carried out by the F-35. They were also used in the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=D'Urso |first=Stefano |date=12 October 2023 |title=Configuration And Payload Of The Aircraft Employed By Israel In The Fight Against Hamas |url=https://theaviationist.com/2023/10/12/iaf-aircraft-war-with-hamas/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240114223401/https://theaviationist.com/2023/10/12/iaf-aircraft-war-with-hamas/ |archive-date=14 January 2024 |website=The Aviationist}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Carlin |first=Maya |date=12 October 2023 |title=Meet the F-35I Adir: Israel Has a 'Stealth' Fighter Not Even America Has |url=https://www.19fortyfive.com/2023/10/israels-special-f-35-variant/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231118214705/https://www.19fortyfive.com/2023/10/israels-special-f-35-variant/ |archive-date=18 November 2023 |website=19FortyFive}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Osborn |first=Kris |date=18 October 2023 |title=Is Israel Using It's Special "Adir" F-35i Variant to Attack Hamas? |url=https://warriormaven.com/global-security/is-israel-using-its-special-adir-f-35i-variant-to-attack-hamas |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231120200658/https://warriormaven.com/global-security/is-israel-using-its-special-adir-f-35i-variant-to-attack-hamas |archive-date=20 November 2023 |website=Warrior Maven: Center for Military Modernization}}</ref>

On 2 November 2023, the IDF posted on social media that they used an F-35I to shoot down a Houthi cruise missile over the Red Sea that was fired from Yemen during the Israel-Hamas War.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Frantzman |first=Seth J. |date=2 November 2023 |title=Israel uses F-35I to shoot down cruise missile, a first for Joint Strike Fighter |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2023/11/israel-uses-f-35i-to-shoot-down-cruise-missile-a-first-for-joint-strike-fighter/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231217100514/https://breakingdefense.com/2023/11/israel-uses-f-35i-to-shoot-down-cruise-missile-a-first-for-joint-strike-fighter/ |archive-date=17 December 2023 |website=Breaking Defense}}</ref>

The F-35I Adir was used in the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last= |title=Israel strikes Yemeni port with advanced F-35I Adir jets |url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/israel-strikes-yemeni-port-with-advanced-f-35i-adir-jets/ar-AA1rqziv |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=MSN}}</ref> F-35Is were also reportedly involved in the ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-26 |title=Behind the scenes of Israeli attack: Over 100 aircraft and a 2,000 km journey to Iran |url=https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-826126 |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=The Jerusalem Post |language=en}}</ref>

===Italy===
Italy's F-35As were declared to have reached initial operational capability (IOC) on 30 November 2018. At the time Italy had taken delivery of 10 F-35As and one F-35B, with 2 F-35As and the one F-35B being stationed in the U.S. for training, the remaining 8 F-35As were stationed in Amendola.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kington |first1=Tom |date=30 November 2018 |title=Italy F-35s reach initial operating capability |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/11/30/italy-f-35s-reach-initial-operating-capability/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122130824/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/11/30/italy-f-35s-reach-initial-operating-capability/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=13 January 2022 |website=Defense News}}</ref>

===Japan===
]

Japan's F-35As were declared to have reached initial operational capability (IOC) on 29 March 2019. At the time Japan had taken delivery of 10 F-35As stationed in ]. Japan plans to eventually acquire a total of 147 F-35s, which will include 42 F-35Bs. It plans to use the latter variant to equip Japan's {{sclass|Izumo|multi-purpose destroyer|2}}<nowiki/>s.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Yeo |first1=Mike |date=1 April 2019 |title=Asia allies take major steps forward with F-35 rollout |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2019/04/01/asia-allies-take-major-steps-forward-with-f-35-rollout/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122130849/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2019/04/01/asia-allies-take-major-steps-forward-with-f-35-rollout/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=7 August 2022 |website=Defense News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Gady |first=Franz-Stefan |date=1 April 2019 |title=Japan Air Self Defense Force Stands Up First F-35A Lightning II Fighter Squadron |url=https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/japan-air-self-defense-force-stands-up-first-f-35a-lightning-ii-fighter-squadron/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405164650/https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/japan-air-self-defense-force-stands-up-first-f-35a-lightning-ii-fighter-squadron/ |archive-date=5 April 2023 |website=The Diplomat}}</ref>

===Norway===
]

On 6 November 2019 Norway declared initial operational capability (IOC) for its fleet of 15 F-35As out of a planned 52 F-35As.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Host |first1=Pat |date=7 November 2019 |title=Norway declares F-35A initial operational capability |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/norway-declares-f-35a-initial-operational-capability |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084350/https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/norway-declares-f-35a-initial-operational-capability |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=13 January 2022 |website=Jane's}}</ref> On 6 January 2022 Norway's F-35As replaced its F-16s for the NATO quick reaction alert mission in the high north.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sprenger |first1=Sebastian |date=6 January 2022 |title=Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2022/01/06/norway-swaps-in-its-f-35s-for-nato-quick-reaction-mission-in-the-high-north/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122131115/https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2022/01/06/norway-swaps-in-its-f-35s-for-nato-quick-reaction-mission-in-the-high-north/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=13 January 2022 |website=Defense News}}</ref>

On 22 September 2023, two F-35As from the ] landed on a motorway near ], Finland, showing, for the first time, that F-35As can operate from paved roads. Unlike the F-35B they cannot land vertically. The fighters were also refueled with their engines running. Commander of the ], Major General Rolf Folland, said: "Fighter jets are vulnerable on the ground, so by being able to use small airfields – and now motorways – (this) increases our survivability in war,"<ref>{{cite web |author=Fouche |first=Gwladys |date=23 September 2023 |title=Lockheed Martin F-35A fighter jets land on motorway |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/lockheed-martin-f-35a-fighter-jets-land-motorway-2023-09-22/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231024073419/https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/lockheed-martin-f-35a-fighter-jets-land-motorway-2023-09-22/ |archive-date=24 October 2023 |access-date=24 September 2023 |website=Reuters}}</ref>

===Netherlands===
On 27 December 2021 the Netherlands declared initial operational capability (IOC) for its fleet of 24 F-35As that it has received to date from its order for 46 F-35As.<ref name="auto3">{{cite web |last1=Jennings |first1=Gareth |date=29 December 2021 |title=Netherlands declares IOC for F-35 |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/netherlands-declares-ioc-for-f-35 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084431/https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/netherlands-declares-ioc-for-f-35 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=13 January 2022 |website=Jane's}}</ref> In 2022, the Netherlands announced they will order an additional six F-35s, totaling 52 aircraft ordered.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://english.defensie.nl/binaries/defence/documenten/publications/2022/07/19/defence-white-paper-2022/Defence+White+Paper+2022.pdf |title=Defense White Paper 2022 |date=19 July 2022 |publisher=Dutch Ministry of Defense |page=28}}</ref>

==Variants==
{{multiple image
| align = right
| direction = vertical
| width = 200
| header =
| image1 = F-35 A B C Config.png
| alt1 = F-35 configurations
| image_caption1 = The three main variants: ] for conventional take-off and landing, ] for short take-off and vertical-landing, and CV for carrier variant
| image2 = A U.S. Air Force pilot navigates an F-35A Lightning II aircraft assigned to the 58th Fighter Squadron, 33rd Fighter Wing into position to refuel with a KC-135 Stratotanker assigned to the 336th Air Refueling 130516-F-XL333-496.jpg
| alt2 = F-35A
| image_caption2 = USAF F-35A in flight, 2013
| image3 = Flickr - Official U.S. Navy Imagery - An F-35B Lightning II makes first vertical landing at sea.ogv
| alt3 = F-35B landing
| image_caption3 = Video of a USMC F-35B conducting the first vertical landing aboard USS ''Wasp'' on 3 October 2011
| image4 = Formation of F-35 Aircraft MOD 45157750.jpg
| alt4 = F-35 variants in flight
| image_caption4 = F-35 variants flying in formation. The F-35C (left) has a larger wing than other variants, while the F-35B (center) has a shorter nozzle and no tailhook.
}} }}


The F-35 was designed with three initial variants – the F-35A, a CTOL land-based version; the F-35B, a STOVL version capable of use either on land or on aircraft carriers; and the F-35C, a CATOBAR carrier-based version. Since then, there has been work on the design of nationally specific versions for Israel and Canada.

===F-35A===
The F-35A is the ] (CTOL) variant intended for the USAF and other air forces. It is the smallest, lightest version and capable of 9 ], the highest of all variants.

Although the F-35A currently conducts ] via boom and receptacle method, the aircraft can be modified for ] refueling if needed by the customer.<ref>{{cite web |last=Waldron |first=Greg |date=2 August 2012 |title=In Focus: Tokyo casts wary eye on Chinese airpower developments |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/in-focus-tokyo-casts-wary-eye-on-chinese-airpower-developments-375007/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200220163258/https://www.flightglobal.com/in-focus-tokyo-casts-wary-eye-on-chinese-airpower-developments/106491.article |archive-date=20 February 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/06/19/lockheeds-comprehensive-qa-on-the-f-35/ |title=Lockheed's comprehensive Q&A on the F-35 |first=Philip |last=Ewing |date=19 June 2012 |website=DoD Buzz |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120818131239/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/06/19/lockheeds-comprehensive-qa-on-the-f-35/ |archive-date=18 August 2012}}</ref><!-- Add flight testing info to Testing section above. --> A ] pod can be installed on the F-35A, with the ] being the first operator to adopt it.<ref name="auto">{{cite web |date=13 August 2014 |title=F-35 Lightning Drag Chute |url=https://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_gallery_slideshow.html?gallery_id=177&gallery_style=1 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327102017/http://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_gallery_slideshow.html?gallery_id=177&gallery_style=1 |archive-date=27 March 2023 |access-date=20 January 2020 |website=Code One Magazine}}</ref>

===F-35B===
{{See also|Joint Combat Aircraft}}
]
]

The F-35B is the ] (STOVL) variant of the aircraft. Similar in size to the A variant, the B sacrifices about a third of the A variant's fuel volume to accommodate the shaft-driven lift fan (SDLF).<ref>{{cite journal |title=The STOVL Joint Strike Fighter in Support of the 21st Century Marine Corps |first=Ben D. |last=Hancock |year=1997 |website=Defense Technical Information Center |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA493330}}</ref><ref name="From Archive.org-2117330">{{cite web |url=http://www.usace-isc.org/presentation/Geotech%20and%20Materials%20II/Constructability_of_a_High_Temperature_Concrete_Pad_Bly_Peter.pdf |title=Constructability of a High Temperature Concrete Pad |work=Geotechnical & Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC) |first=Peter |last=Bly |date=14 June 2011 |access-date=15 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425045722/http://www.usace-isc.org/presentation/Geotech%20and%20Materials%20II/Constructability_of_a_High_Temperature_Concrete_Pad_Bly_Peter.pdf |archive-date=25 April 2012}}</ref> This variant is limited to 7&nbsp;g. Unlike other variants, the F-35B has no landing hook. The "STOVL/HOOK" control instead engages conversion between normal and vertical flight.<ref name=guyReac>{{cite web |url=http://aviationweek.com/blog/pilot-reaction-flying-f-35b |title=Pilot reaction to flying the F-35B |first=Guy |last=Norris |date=24 April 2014 |website=] |access-date=15 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140727190007/http://aviationweek.com/blog/pilot-reaction-flying-f-35b |archive-date=27 July 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Dsouza |first=Larkins |date=16 March 2010 |title=F-35B STOVL-mode Flight |url=http://www.defenceaviation.com/2010/03/f-35-flightmode.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200815075045/https://www.defenceaviation.com/2010/03/f-35-flightmode.html |archive-date=15 August 2020 |access-date=25 November 2010 |website=Defence Aviation}}</ref> The F-35B is capable of Mach 1.6 (1,976&nbsp;km/h) and can perform vertical and/or short take-off and landing (]).<ref name="lift1"/>

===F-35C===
The F-35C is a ] variant designed for ] operations from aircraft carriers. Compared to the F-35A, the F-35C features larger wings with ], larger control surfaces for improved low-speed control, stronger landing gear for the stresses of ] arrested landings, a twin-wheel nose gear, and a stronger ] for use with carrier ]s.<ref name="newhook"/> The larger wing area allows for decreased landing speed while increasing both range and payload. The F-35C is limited to 7.5&nbsp;g.<ref name="FY2019 President's Budget Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)"/>

===F-35I "Adir"===
<!-- There is no need for any other mention of F-35I elsewhere in this article. -->
{{Main|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Israeli procurement}}

The F-35I ''Adir'' ({{Langx|he|אדיר}}, meaning "Awesome",<ref>{{cite web |last=Kalman |first=Aaron |date=18 April 2013 |title=Jet's name is just plane 'Awesome' |url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/jets-name-is-just-plane-awesome/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226175320/https://www.timesofisrael.com/jets-name-is-just-plane-awesome/ |archive-date=26 December 2022 |website=The Times of Israel}}</ref> or "Mighty"<ref>{{cite web |website=Lockheed Martin |url=https://www.f35.com/news/detail/israels-first-f-35-lightning-ii-takes-flight |title=Israel's first F-35 Lightning II takes flight |date=26 July 2016 |access-date=4 August 2016 |archive-date=28 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170728140034/https://www.f35.com/news/detail/israels-first-f-35-lightning-ii-takes-flight }}</ref>) is an F-35A with unique Israeli modifications. The US initially refused to allow such changes before permitting Israel to integrate its own electronic warfare systems, including sensors and countermeasures. The main computer has a plug-and-play function for add-on systems; proposals include an external jamming pod, and new Israeli air-to-air missiles and guided bombs in the internal weapon bays.<ref name="Alon Ben-David">{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/awst/2010/08/23/AW_08_23_2010_p32-249396.xml |title=Israel To Buy F-35s With Cockpit Mods |first=Alon |last=Ben-David |date=27 August 2010 |website=Aviation Week}}{{dead link |date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref name=AW_Israel_July2011>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/awst/2011/07/04/AW_07_04_2011_p22-342412.xml&headline=Israel,%20U.S.%20Strike%20F-35%20Technology%20Deal&prev=10 |title=Israel, U.S. Strike F-35 Technology Deal |first1=Alon |last1=Ben-David |first2=Amy |last2=Butler |first3=Robert |last3=Wall |name-list-style=amp |date=7 July 2011 |website=]}}{{dead link |date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> A senior IAF official said that the F-35's stealth may be partly overcome within 10 years despite a 30 to 40-year service life, thus Israel's insistence on using their own electronic warfare systems.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_08_06_2012_p28-482027.xml |title=Israel, U.S. Agree To $450 Million In F-35 EW Work |first1=Eshel |last1=David |first2=David |last2=Fulghum |date=6 August 2012 |website=Aviation Week |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510231649/http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=%2Farticle-xml%2FAW_08_06_2012_p28-482027.xml |archive-date=10 May 2013}}</ref> In 2010, ] (IAI) considered a two-seat F-35 concept; an IAI executive noted that there was a "known demand for two seats not only from Israel but from other air forces".<ref>{{cite web |last=Trimble |first=Stephen |date=22 January 2010 |title=Israel sets sights on two-seater F-35 |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/israel-sets-sights-on-two-seater-f-35-337464/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811165123/https://www.flightglobal.com/israel-sets-sights-on-two-seater-f-35/91561.article |archive-date=11 August 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref> In 2008, IAI planned to produce ]s.<ref>{{cite web |last=Egozi |first=Arie |date=11 January 2008 |title=Israel to boost range of future F-35 fleet |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/israel-to-boost-range-of-future-f-35-fleet-220748/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200409065530/https://www.flightglobal.com/israel-to-boost-range-of-future-f-35-fleet/78193.article |archive-date=9 April 2020 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref>{{update after|2024|8|10}}<!-- were either ever done? two seater? conformal fuel tanks? -->

Israel had ordered a total of 75 F-35Is by 2023, with 36 already delivered as of November 2022.<ref>{{cite news |last=Frankel |first=Julia |date=2 July 2023 |title=Israel to buy more F-35 fighter jets from US. Deal expands fleet by 50% and deepens partnership |url=https://apnews.com/article/israel-f35-warplanes-iran-nuclear-0dcad6fc8a68b543575bf78fecf8217c |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231219175011/https://apnews.com/article/israel-f35-warplanes-iran-nuclear-0dcad6fc8a68b543575bf78fecf8217c |archive-date=19 December 2023 |work=AP News |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Bob |first=Yonah Jeremy |date=30 April 2023 |title=As F-35 deals move forward in US, where does Israel stand? - analysis |url=https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-741716 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240121185252/https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-741716 |archive-date=21 January 2024 |work=The Jerusalem Post}}</ref>

===Proposed variants===

====CF-35====
{{main|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement}}

The Canadian CF-35 was a proposed variant that would differ from the F-35A through the addition of a ] and the potential inclusion of an F-35B/C-style refueling probe.<ref name="auto" /><ref name="C4Wauto-8740196">{{cite news |last=Daly |first=Brian |date=1 September 2010 |title=Harper, Ignatieff spar over fighter jets |url=http://www.calgarysun.com/news/canada/2010/09/01/15213341.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140302043627/http://www.calgarysun.com/news/canada/2010/09/01/15213341.html |archive-date=2 March 2014 |access-date=2 March 2014 |newspaper=]}}</ref> In 2012, it was revealed that the CF-35 would employ the same boom refueling system as the F-35A.<ref name="oCanada-2012-12-20">{{cite web
| first = Lee
| last = Berthiaume
| title = Military will contract out air-to-air refuelling if Canada goes with F-35
| url = http://o.canada.com/news/national/military-will-contract-out-air-to-air-refuelling-if-canada-goes-with-f-35/
| work = Canada.com
| date = 20 December 2012
| access-date = 2 March 2014
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140302041720/http://o.canada.com/news/national/military-will-contract-out-air-to-air-refuelling-if-canada-goes-with-f-35/
| archive-date = 2 March 2014
}}</ref> One alternative proposal would have been the adoption of the F-35C for its probe refueling and lower landing speed; however, the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report cited the F-35C's limited performance and payload as being too high a price to pay.<ref name="C4Wauto-2064727">{{cite web
| first1 = Tolga R.
| last1 = Yalkin
| first2 = Peter
| last2 = Weltman
| title = An Estimate of the Fiscal Impact of Canada's Proposed Acquisition of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter
| url = https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/406973/publication.html
| url-status = live
| date = 10 March 2011
| website = Office of the Parliamentary Budget Office
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140302044823/http://www.parl.gc.ca/pbo-dpb/documents/F-35_Cost_Estimate_EN.pdf
| archive-date = 2 March 2014
}}</ref> Following the ] the ], whose campaign had included a pledge to cancel the F-35 procurement,<ref name="Liberal2015Platform">{{cite web
| title = A New Plan For a Strong Middle Class
| url = https://www.liberal.ca/files/2015/10/New-plan-for-a-strong-middle-class.pdf
| access-date = 5 October 2015
| website = Liberal Party of Canada
| date = 5 October 2015
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151014055323/https://www.liberal.ca/files/2015/10/New-plan-for-a-strong-middle-class.pdf
| archive-date = 14 October 2015
}}</ref> formed a new government and commenced an open competition to replace the existing ].<ref name="canada_exit">{{cite web |last1=Drew |first1=James |date=21 October 2015 |title=Canadian F-35 exit could signal wider air force review |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/canadian-f-35-exit-could-signal-wider-air-force-review/118614.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108113351/https://www.flightglobal.com/canadian-f-35-exit-could-signal-wider-air-force-review/118614.article |archive-date=8 November 2020 |access-date=9 January 2023 |website=]}}</ref> The CF-35 variant was deemed too expensive to develop, and was never considered. The Canadian government decided to not pursue any other modifications in the ], and instead focused on the potential procurement of the existing F-35A variant.<ref>{{cite web |date=30 May 2018 |title=Future Fighter Capability Project - Defence Capabilities Blueprint |url=http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/defence-capabilities-blueprint/project-details.asp?id=928 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122035747/https://apps.forces.gc.ca/en/defence-capabilities-blueprint/project-details.asp?id=928 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |website=Canadian Department of National Defence}}</ref>

On 28 March 2022, the Canadian Government began negotiations with Lockheed Martin for 88 F-35As<ref name="Brewster 28Mar22">{{cite web
| last = Brewster
| first = Murray
| title = Liberals launch negotiations to buy F-35 fighter jets
| url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f-35-negotiations-1.6399978
| publisher = ]
| date = 28 March 2022
| access-date = 9 January 2023
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20221118230307/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f-35-negotiations-1.6399978
| archive-date = 18 November 2022
}}</ref> to replace the aging fleet of CF-18 fighters starting in 2025.<ref>{{Cite web
| title = Future fighter capability project
| url = https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/procurement/fighter-jets/future-fighter-capability-project.html
| date = 9 January 2023
| access-date = 9 January 2023
| work = National Defence (canada.ca)
}}</ref> The aircraft are reported to cost up to CA$19bn total with a life-cycle cost estimated at CA$77bn over the course of the F-35 program.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Dubois |first1=Gastón |date=21 June 2022 |title=Nine fully operational Canadian F-35 stealth fighters by 2027? |url=https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/06/nine-fully-operational-canadian-f-35-stealth-fighters-by-2027/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230105084611/https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/06/nine-fully-operational-canadian-f-35-stealth-fighters-by-2027/ |archive-date=5 January 2023 |website=Aviacionline.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=30 September 2022 |title=Swedish jet maker complains Ottawa not following rules with F-35 negotiations |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/swedish-jet-maker-complains-ottawa-not-following-rules-with-f-35-negotiations-1.6091199 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230308043225/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/swedish-jet-maker-complains-ottawa-not-following-rules-with-f-35-negotiations-1.6091199 |archive-date=8 March 2023 |publisher=]}}</ref> On 9 January 2023, Canada formally confirmed the purchase of 88 aircraft. The initial delivery to the ] in 2026 will be 4 aircraft, followed by 6 aircraft each in 2027–2028, and the rest to be delivered by 2032.<ref>{{Cite web
| author = Anita Anand, Minister of Defence
| title = Announcement regarding the F-35 acquisition
| url = https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2023/01/announcement-regarding-the-f-35-acquisition.html
| date = 9 January 2023
| access-date = 9 January 2023
| publisher = National Defence (canada.ca)
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Berthiaume |first=Lee |date=9 January 2023 |title=Canada ends years-long search for new fighter jet with deal to buy F-35s |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/canada-buying-f-35s-as-defence-minister-says-once-maligned-jets-have-matured-1.6222706 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084656/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/canada-buying-f-35s-as-defence-minister-says-once-maligned-jets-have-matured-1.6222706 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=9 January 2023 |publisher=]}}</ref> The additional characteristics confirmed for the CF-35{{inconsistent}}<!-- previous prose in the section says the CF-35 was cancelled and F-35A were taken by Candadian military. Which is it? --> included the drag chute pod for landings at short/icy arctic runways, as well as the 'sidekick' system, which allows the CF-35 to carry up to 6 x ] missiles internally (instead of the typical internal capacity of 4 x AIM-120 missiles on other variants).<ref>{{cite web |last=Parken |first=Oliver |date=9 January 2023 |title=Canada Closes Deal for 88 F35s to Finally Replace Its Aging CF18s |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/canada-closes-deal-for-88-f-35s-to-finally-replace-its-aging-cf-18s |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230324220336/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/canada-closes-deal-for-88-f-35s-to-finally-replace-its-aging-cf-18s |archive-date=24 March 2023 |access-date=20 January 2021 |website=The Drive}}</ref>

====New export variant====
In December 2021, it was reported that Lockheed Martin was developing a new variant for an unspecified foreign customer. The Department of Defense released US$49&nbsp;million in funding for this work.<ref>{{cite web |last=Jennings |first=Gareth |date=20 December 2021 |title=Lockheed Martin to design and develop F-35 variant 'tailored' for foreign customer |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/lockheed-martin-to-design-and-develop-f-35-variant-tailored-for-foreign-customer |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084656/https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/lockheed-martin-to-design-and-develop-f-35-variant-tailored-for-foreign-customer |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=Janes}}</ref>

==Operators==
{{Main|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II operators|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement}}
<!-- Do not add to this list until until there is a signed and approved purchase contract.-->
]
]
]
] conducts a test flight over ] in October 2015.]]
], June 2018]]
] aboard {{USS|Abraham Lincoln|CVN-72|6}}.]]

;{{AUS}}
* ] – 72 F-35A delivered {{as of|2024|12|lc=on}}, of 72 ordered.<ref name="DefenceJSFDec2024"/>
;{{BEL}}
* ] – 1 officially delivered<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 December 2023 |title=Belgium receives first F-35 |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/belgium-receives-first-f-35 |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=Janes.com |language=en}}</ref> (but none have left the US {{as of|2024|3|lc=y}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-03-25 |title=F-35 delivery delays: a problem for European air forces - War Wings Daily |url=https://warwingsdaily.com/f-35-delivery-delays-a-problem-for-european-air-forces/ |access-date=2024-04-22 |language=en-US}}</ref>), 34 F-35A planned {{as of|2019|lc=on}}.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Emmott |first1=Robin |date=25 October 2018 |title=Belgium picks Lockheed's F-35 over Eurofighter on price |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aerospace-belgium/belgium-picks-lockheeds-f-35-over-eurofighter-on-price-idUSKCN1MZ1S0 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181025145835/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aerospace-belgium/belgium-picks-lockheeds-f-35-over-eurofighter-on-price-idUSKCN1MZ1S0 |archive-date=25 October 2018 |work=Reuters |location=Brussels}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=8 July 2019 |title=Luchtmachtbasissen moeten verbouwd worden voor F-35: 275 miljoen euro |url=https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20190708_04499594 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708070631/https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20190708_04499594 |archive-date=8 July 2019 |newspaper=] |language=nl}}</ref>
;{{flaglist|Denmark}}
* ] – 10 F-35As delivered (including 6 stationed at ] for training) of the 27 planned for the RDAF.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Danish F-35 aircraft achieve new milestone in the USA |url=https://airrecognition.com/index.php/news/defense-aviation-news/2021/november/7849-danish-f-35-aircraft-achieve-new-milestone-in-the-usa.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231208195807/https://airrecognition.com/index.php/news/defense-aviation-news/2021/november/7849-danish-f-35-aircraft-achieve-new-milestone-in-the-usa.html |archive-date=8 December 2023 |access-date=17 November 2021 |website=Air Recognition}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Agreement on Procurement for New Fighters |url=http://www.fmn.dk/nyheder/Documents/aftale-vedr-kampflyanskaffelse-2016.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006150939/https://www.fmn.dk/nyheder/Documents/aftale-vedr-kampflyanskaffelse-2016.pdf |archive-date=6 October 2019 |access-date=9 June 2016 |website=Danish Ministry of Defence |language=da}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=1 May 2023 |title=Det første F-35, der skal til Danmark, er nu leveret i USA |url=https://www.forsvaret.dk/da/nyheder/2023/det-forste-f-35-der-skal-til-danmark-er-nu-leveret-i-usa/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001094734/https://www.forsvaret.dk/da/nyheder/2023/det-forste-f-35-der-skal-til-danmark-er-nu-leveret-i-usa/ |archive-date=1 October 2023 |access-date=4 May 2023 |publisher=Forsvaret |language=Danish}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=14 September 2023 |title=Denmark's First F-35s Arrive at Skrydstrup Air Base |url=https://www.f35.com/f35/news-and-features/denmark-first-f35-arrive.html?linkId=100000218505179 |access-date=15 September 2023 |website=www.f35.com |language=en}}</ref>
;{{flaglist|Israel}}
* ] – 39 delivered {{as of|2023|7|lc=on}} (F-35I "Adir").<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 July 2023 |title=Israel receives new F-35 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin, bolstering arsenal |url=https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/defense/1689933450-israel-receives-new-f-35-fighter-jets-from-lockheed-martin |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118053123/https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/defense/1689933450-israel-receives-new-f-35-fighter-jets-from-lockheed-martin |archive-date=18 January 2024 |website=I24news |language=en}}</ref> Includes one F-35 ] for indigenous Israeli weapons, electronics and structural upgrades, designated (AS-15).<ref name="Israel_F-35i">{{cite web |last1=Mathew |first1=Arun |title=Unique F-35I Test Aircraft Arrives in Israel |url=https://defpost.com/unique-f-35i-test-aircraft-arrives-in-israel/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210113231747/https://defpost.com/unique-f-35i-test-aircraft-arrives-in-israel/ |archive-date=13 January 2021 |access-date=7 January 2021 |website=DefPost}}</ref><ref name="jpost.com">{{cite news |last=Ahronheim |first=Anna |date=26 November 2018 |title=Air Force Bolsters Stealth Power as More F-35I Fighter Jets Land in Israel |url=https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Two-more-F-35i-Adir-jets-land-in-Israel-572831 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226173826/https://www.jpost.com//israel-news/two-more-f-35i-adir-jets-land-in-israel-572831 |archive-date=26 December 2022 |work=The Jerusalem Post}}</ref> A total of 75 ordered.<ref>{{cite web |last=Israel |first=David |date=2 July 2023 |title=Israel to Purchase 3rd F-35 Squadron, Will Up Number of Stealth Fighters to 75 |url=https://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/idf/israel-to-purchase-3rd-f-35-squadron-upping-number-of-stealth-fighters-to-75/2023/07/02/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702122231/https://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/idf/israel-to-purchase-3rd-f-35-squadron-upping-number-of-stealth-fighters-to-75/2023/07/02/ |archive-date=2 July 2023 |access-date= |work=Jewishpress}}</ref>
;{{ITA}}
* ] – 17 F-35As and 3 F-35B delivered {{as of|2023|4|lc=on}}<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kington |first1=Tom |date=28 May 2020 |title=Italy defense minister commits to F-35 after calls to suspend program |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/05/28/italy-defense-minister-commits-to-f-35-after-calls-to-suspend-program/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122013400/https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/05/28/italy-defense-minister-commits-to-f-35-after-calls-to-suspend-program/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=13 January 2021 |website=Defense News}}</ref> of 75 F-35As and 20 F-35Bs ordered for the Italian Air Force.<ref name="ItalyPlans">{{cite news |last=Kington |first=Tom |date=21 October 2020 |title=Italy's Navy-Air Force tussle over the F-35 comes to a head |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/10/21/italys-navy-air-force-tussle-over-the-f-35-comes-to-a-head/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201021160020/https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/10/21/italys-navy-air-force-tussle-over-the-f-35-comes-to-a-head/ |archive-date=21 October 2020 |access-date=14 January 2021 |work=Defense News}}</ref><ref name="LockheedItaly">{{cite web |date=February 2017 |title=F-35 Lightning II: Creating Jobs. Securing Italy's Future |url=https://www.f35.com/assets/uploads/documents/FG17-03515_002_English.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707051512/https://www.f35.com/assets/uploads/documents/FG17-03515_002_English.pdf |archive-date=7 July 2017 |access-date=14 January 2021 |website=F35.com |publisher=Lockheed Martin |quote=Aeronautica Militare is programmed to receive 60 F-35A CTOLs and 15 F-35B STOVLs, while Marina Militare is programmed to acquire 15 F-35B STOVLs.}}</ref><ref name="italy-2023">{{cite web |last=Cenciotti |first=David |date=29 March 2023 |title=Future Base, Expected FOC And More About The Italian F-35 Fleet |url=https://theaviationist.com/2023/03/30/future-base-expected-foc-and-more-about-the-italian-f-35-fleet/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084813/https://theaviationist.com/2023/03/30/future-base-expected-foc-and-more-about-the-italian-f-35-fleet/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=7 April 2023 |work=The Aviationist}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-09-17 |title=Italy announced its intentions to acquire Typhoons and 25 F-35s |url=https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/09/17/italy-announced-its-intentions-to-acquire-typhoons-and-25-f-35s/ |access-date=2024-09-18 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="Giansiracusa">{{cite web |last1=Giansiracusa |first1=Aurelio |title=Ulteriori venticinque F-35 per Aeronautica e Marina Militare |url=https://aresdifesa.it/ulteriori-venticinque-f-35-per-aeronautica-e-marina-militare/ |publisher=Ares Difesa |access-date=22 December 2024}}</ref>
* ] – 3 delivered {{as of|2023|4|lc=on}}, out of 20 F-35Bs ordered for the Italian Navy.<ref name="ItalyPlans" /><ref name="LockheedItaly" /><ref name="italy-2023" /><ref name="Giansiracusa"/>
;{{JPN}}
* ] – 27 F-35As operational {{as of|2022|3|lc=y}} with a total order of 147, including 105 F-35As and 42 F-35Bs.<ref name="Diplomat">{{cite magazine |last1=Gady |first1=Franz-Stefan |date=1 April 2019 |title=Japan Air Self Defense Force Stands Up First F-35A Lightning II Fighter Squadron |url=https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/japan-air-self-defense-force-stands-up-first-f-35a-lightning-ii-fighter-squadron/ |magazine=The Diplomat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Kelly |first1=Tim |last2=Kubo |first2=Nobuhiro |date=21 February 2018 |title=Exclusive: Japan to buy at least 20 more F-35A stealth fighters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-defence-f35-exclusive/exclusive-japan-to-buy-at-least-20-more-f-35a-stealth-fighters-sources-idUSKCN1G507W |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122014251/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-defence-f35-exclusive/exclusive-japan-to-buy-at-least-20-more-f-35a-stealth-fighters-sources-idUSKCN1G507W/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=21 February 2018 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Harding |first=Robin |date=18 December 2018 |title=Japan to expand military with 100 more F-35 stealth fighters |url=https://www.ft.com/content/f32519c8-0263-11e9-99df-6183d3002ee1 |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/f32519c8-0263-11e9-99df-6183d3002ee1 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |access-date=10 January 2019 |newspaper=Financial Times}}</ref><ref name="doj2022">{{cite web |title=Defence of Japan 2022 (Annual White Paper) |url=https://www.mod.go.jp/j/publication/wp/wp2022/pdf/R04shiryo.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221206231056/https://www.mod.go.jp/j/publication/wp/wp2022/pdf/R04shiryo.pdf |archive-date=6 December 2022 |website=Ministry of Defence (Japan) |page=53 |language=Japanese}}</ref>
;{{NLD}}
* ] – 39 F-35As delivered and operational, of which 8 trainer aircraft based at ] in the USA.<ref name="auto3" /> 52 F-35As ordered in total.<ref name="World Air Forces 2014">{{cite web |year=2014 |title=World Air Forces 2014 |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/reports_pdf/emptys/108161/world-air-forces-2014.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201152044/http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/reports_pdf/emptys/108161/world-air-forces-2014.pdf |archive-date=1 February 2014 |website=Flight Global Insight}}</ref><ref name="RNAF">{{cite web |date=26 March 2015 |title=Netherlands Orders Eight F-35s |url=http://aviationweek.com/defense/netherlands-orders-eight-f-35s |url-access=subscription |access-date=25 May 2015 |work=Aviation Week}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=14 December 2018 |title=Defence spending to be stepped up, more tanks and F-35 jets |url=https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2018/12/defence-spending-to-be-stepped-up-more-tanks-and-f-35-jets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122015750/https://www.dutchnews.nl/2018/12/defence-spending-to-be-stepped-up-more-tanks-and-f-35-jets/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=15 December 2018 |work=DutchNews.nl}}</ref> The RNLAF is the second air force with a 5th gen-only fighter fleet after the retirement of its F-16s.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Silvestris |first=Elia |date=2024-09-27 |title=End of an Era: Bidding Farewell to the F-16 in the RNLAF After 45 Years of Service |url=https://theaviationist.com/2024/09/27/rnlaf-f-16-retires/ |access-date=2024-09-28 |website=The Aviationist |language=en-US}}</ref>
;{{flaglist|Norway}}
* ] – 40<ref>{{Cite web |title=Norge har mottatt 37 F-35 |url=https://www.forsvaret.no/aktuelt-og-presse/presse/pressemeldinger/norge-har-mottatt-37-f-35 |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=Forsvaret |language=nb}}</ref> F-35As delivered and operational, of which 21 are in Norway and 10 are based in the US for training {{as of|2021|8|11|lc=y}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=13 August 2021 |title=Norway receives another three F-35As |url=https://www.key.aero/article/norway-receives-another-three-f-35as |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084814/https://www.key.aero/article/norway-receives-another-three-f-35as |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=17 November 2021 |website=key.aero |language=en}}</ref> of 52 F-35As planned in total.<ref>{{cite web |title=Northrop Grumman completes center fuselage for first Norwegian F-35 aircraft |url=https://www.f35.com/news/detail/northrop-grumman-completes-center-fuselage-for-first-norwegian-f-35-aircraf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170624162559/https://www.f35.com/news/detail/northrop-grumman-completes-center-fuselage-for-first-norwegian-f-35-aircraf |archive-date=24 June 2017 |access-date=31 March 2015 |work=F-35 Lightning II}}</ref> They differ from other F-35A through the addition of a ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Insinna |first=Valerie |date=11 October 2019 |title=Norway's F-35s have a problem with a unique piece of gear |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/10/11/norways-f-35s-have-a-problem-with-a-unique-piece-of-gear/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191013130733/https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/10/11/norways-f-35s-have-a-problem-with-a-unique-piece-of-gear/ |archive-date=13 October 2019 |website=Defense News}}</ref>
; {{KOR}}
* ] – 40 F-35As ordered and delivered {{as of|2022|1|lc=y}},<ref>{{cite web |last=Sang-ho |first=Song |date=27 January 2022 |title=S. Korea's Air Force completes deployment of 40 F-35A fighters: sources |url=https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20220127013600325 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084431/https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20220127013600325 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=4 February 2022 |work=Yonhap News Agency}}</ref> with 25 more ordered in September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Vavasseur |first=Xavier |date=4 September 2020 |title=South Korea to Double Down on F-35 and Procure STOVL Variant for LPX-II |url=https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/09/south-korea-to-double-down-on-f-35-and-procure-stovl-variant-for-lpx-ii/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010085005/https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/09/south-korea-to-double-down-on-f-35-and-procure-stovl-variant-for-lpx-ii/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=9 April 2021 |website=Naval News |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Waldron |first1=Greg |date=13 April 2020 |title=USA approves $675 million support package for Korean F-35s |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/usa-approves-675-million-support-package-for-korean-f-35s/137849.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200813203117/https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/usa-approves-675-million-support-package-for-korean-f-35s/137849.article |archive-date=13 August 2020 |access-date=13 January 2021 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Smith |first=Josh |date=20 December 2017 |title=South Korea plans to buy 20 additional F-35 aircraft: report |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-usa-airforce/south-korea-plans-to-buy-20-additional-f-35-aircraft-report-idUSKBN1EF051?il=0 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018030619/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-usa-airforce/south-korea-plans-to-buy-20-additional-f-35-aircraft-report-idUSKBN1EF051?il=0 |archive-date=18 October 2023 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Yeo |first=Mike |date=14 September 2023 |title=US State Department approves South Korea to buy 25 more F-35A jets |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023/09/14/us-state-department-approves-south-korea-to-buy-25-more-f-35a-jets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122020838/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023/09/14/us-state-department-approves-south-korea-to-buy-25-more-f-35a-jets/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |access-date=7 November 2023 |website=Defense News}}</ref>
* ] – about 20 F-35Bs planned.<ref>{{cite web |last=Farley |first=Robert |date=2 January 2018 |title=Who Wants to Operate Carrier-Based F-35Bs in Asia? Apparently, Japan and South Korea |url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/who-wants-to-operate-carrier-based-f-35bs-in-asia-apparently-japan-and-south-korea/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003173012/https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/who-wants-to-operate-carrier-based-f-35bs-in-asia-apparently-japan-and-south-korea/ |archive-date=3 October 2023 |website=The Diplomat}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=5 August 2020 |title=S. Korea begins procedures to introduce F-35B fighters for light aircraft carrier |url=https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200805006600325?section=national/defense |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230928173859/https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200805006600325?section=national/defense |archive-date=28 September 2023 |work=Yonhap News Agency}}</ref> It has not yet been approved by ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 December 2021 |title='경항모' 기사회생했지만 탑재 전투기는 F-35B 뿐… 가성비 논란 '여전' |trans-title=The 'light aircraft carrier' was revived, but the only aircraft on board was the F-35B... The cost-effectiveness controversy 'still persists' |url=https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021120515410002820?t=20220317000326 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122021518/https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021120515410002820?t=20220317000326 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |website=한국일보 |language=Korean}}</ref>
;{{UK}}
* ] and ] (owned by the RAF but jointly operated) – 34 F-35Bs received<ref>{{cite web |last=Allison |first=George |date=17 March 2024 |title=Britain takes delivery of more new F-35 stealth jets |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britain-takes-delivery-of-more-new-f-35-stealth-jets/ |access-date=18 June 2024 |website=UK Defence Journal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=26 March 2024 |title=UK receives final TR-2 standard F-35s |url=https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/uk-receives-final-tr-2-standard-f-35s |access-date=18 June 2024 |website=Janes}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Allison |first1=George |date=23 May 2024 |title=Britain takes delivery of more new F-35 jets |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britain-takes-delivery-of-more-new-f-35-jets/ |access-date=18 June 2024 |website=UK Defence Journal}}</ref> with 30 in the UK after the loss of one aircraft in November 2021;<ref name="auto4" /><ref name="auto1">{{Cite news |date=17 November 2021 |title=Probe after British F-35 fighter crashes in Mediterranean |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-59323895 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220511054751/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-59323895 |archive-date=11 May 2022 |work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Allison |first=George |date=4 November 2021 |title=More F-35 jets delivered to the UK |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/more-f-35-jets-delivered-to-the-uk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084759/https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/more-f-35-jets-delivered-to-the-uk/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=UK Defence Journal}}</ref><ref name="itv.com">{{cite web |date=4 August 2018 |title=Further five F-35 fighter jets land at new RAF Marham home |url=http://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2018-08-04/further-five-f-35-fighter-jets-land-at-new-raf-marham-home/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406094040/https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2018-08-04/further-five-f-35-fighter-jets-land-at-new-raf-marham-home |archive-date=6 April 2023 |website=ITV News}}</ref> the other three are in the US where they are used for testing and training.<ref name="marham">{{cite web |title=Lockheed Martin-Built F-35 Comes Home to RAF Marham |url=https://www.f35.com/news/detail/lockheed-martin-built-f-35-comes-home-to-raf-marham |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200914203219/https://www.f35.com/news/detail/lockheed-martin-built-f-35-comes-home-to-raf-marham |archive-date=14 September 2020 |access-date=19 June 2018 |website=F35.com |publisher=Lockheed Martin}}</ref> 42 (24 FOC fighters and 18 training aircraft) originally intended to be fast-tracked by 2023;<ref name="Janes Defence Weekly">{{cite news |date=20 April 2016 |title=UK receives final F-35 test aircraft |work=Janes Defence Weekly |volume=53 |issue=16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Urban |first=Mark |date=24 November 2015 |title=Defence Review: Fighting old battles? |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34901846 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240120114630/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34901846 |archive-date=20 January 2024 |access-date=24 November 2015 |website=BBC News}}</ref> A total of 48 ordered {{as of|2021|lc=y}}; a total of 138 were originally planned, the expectation in 2021 was to eventually reach around 60 or 80.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Allison |first=George |date=23 March 2021 |title=UK looking at '60 and then maybe up to 80′ F-35B jets |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-looking-at-60-maybe-up-to-around-80-f-35b-jets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326025335/https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-looking-at-60-maybe-up-to-around-80-f-35b-jets/ |archive-date=26 March 2023 |website=UK Defence Journal}}</ref> In 2022, it was announced that the UK would acquire 74 F-35Bs, with a decision on whether or not to go beyond that number, including the possibility of reviving the original plan of 138 aircraft, to be made in the mid-2020s.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Glaze |first=Ben |date=8 September 2022 |title=UK will buy a maximum of 74 Lightning stealth warplanes - 64 fewer than planned |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/uk-buy-maximum-74-lightning-27942966 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122022538/https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/uk-buy-maximum-74-lightning-27942966 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |website=Daily Mirror}}</ref> In February 2024 the United Kingdom appeared to signal a reaffirmation of its commitment to procure 138 F-35B aircraft, as per the original plan.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Allison |first=George |date=2024-02-06 |title=UK appears to recommit to full order of 138 F-35Bs |url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-appears-to-recommit-to-full-order-of-138-f-35bs/ |access-date=2024-02-06 |language=en-GB}}</ref>
;{{USA}}
* ] – 302 delivered with 1,763 F-35As planned<ref>{{cite report |url=https://www.saffm.hq.af.mil/Portals/84/documents/FY25/FY25%20Air%20Force%20Aircraft%20Procurement%20Vol%20I.pdf?ver=trnnCwkcSenGdKVniZvWHQ%3d%3d |title=Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Budget Estimates: Air Force – Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Justification Book |date=March 2024 |volume=1 |page=6 |access-date=9 August 2024}}</ref>
* ] – 112 F-35B/C delivered<ref name="2024 World Air Forces">{{cite web |last= |first= |year=2024 |title=2024 World Air Forces directory |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/reports/2024-world-air-forces-directory/156008.article |url-access=registration |access-date=21 January 2024 |publisher=Flightglobal Insight |doi=}}</ref> with 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs planned<ref name="myp">{{cite web |last=Reim |first=Garrett |date=18 April 2018 |title=DOD reveals F-35 multiyear procurement strategy to start in 2021 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/systems-and-interiors/dod-reveals-f-35-multiyear-procurement-strategy-to-start-in-2021/127782.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308233603/https://www.flightglobal.com/systems-and-interiors/dod-reveals-f-35-multiyear-procurement-strategy-to-start-in-2021/127782.article |archive-date=8 March 2021 |work=FlightGlobal}}</ref>
* ] – 30 delivered<ref name="2024 World Air Forces" /> with 273 F-35Cs planned<ref name="myp" />

=== Future operators ===
;{{CAN}}
{{further|Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement}}
*] - 88 F-35As (Block 4) ordered on 9 January 2023. The first 4 are expected to be delivered in 2026, 6 in 2027, another 6 in 2028, and the rest delivered by 2032.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Defence |first=National |date=2023-01-09 |title=Announcement regarding the F-35 acquisition |url=https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2023/01/announcement-regarding-the-f-35-acquisition.html |access-date=2024-04-04 |website=www.canada.ca}}</ref> This will phase out the ]s that were delivered in the 1980s.<ref name="Berthiaume">{{cite web |url= https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/defence-department-gets-ok-to-spend-7-billion-on-16-f-35-fighter-jets-cp-sources-1.6202528|title= Defence Department gets OK to spend $7 billion on 16 F-35 fighter jets: CP sources|access-date= 21 December 2022|last= Berthiaume|first= Lee|work= ]|date= 20 December 2022|archive-url= https://archive.today/20221221010514/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/defence-department-gets-ok-to-spend-7-billion-on-16-f-35-fighter-jets-cp-sources-1.6202528|archive-date= 21 December 2022|url-status= live}}</ref><ref name="Brewster090123">{{cite web|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-f35-fighter-jet-deal-1.6707769|title= Federal government inks deal to buy fleet of F-35 fighter jets|access-date= 9 Jan 2023|last= Brewster|first= Murray|work= ]|date= 9 Jan 2023|archive-url= https://archive.today/20230109165109/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-f35-fighter-jet-deal-1.6707769?cmp=rss|archive-date= 9 January 2023|url-status= live}}</ref>
;{{flag|Czech Republic}}
*] – The U.S. State Department approved a possible sale to the Czech Republic of F-35 aircraft, munitions and related equipment worth up to $5.62&nbsp;billion, according to a 29 June 2023 announcement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lehrfeld |first=Jonathan |date=30 June 2023 |title=US State Dept. clears $5.6 billion sale of F-35s for Czech Republic |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023/06/30/us-state-dept-clears-56-billion-sale-of-f-35s-for-czech-republic/ |website=Defense News}}</ref> On 29 January 2024, the Czech government signed a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. for the purchase of 24 F-35A fighters.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ferran |first=Lee |date=2024-01-29 |title=Czech Republic joins F-35 ranks, inks 'most important' deal with US for 24 aircraft |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2024/01/czech-republic-joins-f-35-ranks-inks-most-important-deal-with-us-for-24-aircraft/ |access-date=2024-01-29 |website=Breaking Defense }}{{Dead link|date=November 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In September 2024, the Czech Republic signed a contract for the logistic support of the F-35A.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McNeil |first=Harry |date=2024-09-27 |title=Lockheed Martin secures deal to integrate F-35s to Czech Republic |url=https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/lockheed-martin-secures-deal-to-integrate-f-35s-to-czech-republic/#:~:text=The%20contract%20will%20cover%20programme,be%20completed%20by%20September%202027.&text=Lockheed%20Martin%20Aeronautics%20has%20been,35%20Joint%20Strike%20Fighter%20programme. |access-date=2024-11-21 |website=Airforce Technology |language=en-US}}</ref>
;{{FIN}}
* ] – 64 F-35As on order {{as of|2022|lc=y}}.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://yle.fi/news/3-12314148 |title=Finland signs F-35 fighter jet deal |date=11 February 2022|website=News}}</ref> F-35A Block 4 selected via the ] to replace the current ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 December 2021 |title=The Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II is Finland's next multi-role fighter |url=https://www.defmin.fi/en/topical/press_releases_and_news/the_lockheed_martin_f-35a_lightning_ii_is_finland_s_next_multi-role_fighter.12335.news#3c918041 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240103221004/https://www.defmin.fi/en/topical/press_releases_and_news/press_release_archive/2021/the_lockheed_martin_f-35a_lightning_ii_is_finland_s_next_multi-role_fighter.12335.news#3c918041 |archive-date=3 January 2024 |website=Ministry of Defence (Finland)}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Ristamäki |first1=Juha |last2=Nurmi |first2=Lauri |date=5 December 2021 |title=IL:n tiedot: Puolustusvoimat esittää yhdysvaltalaista F-35:ttä Suomen uudeksi hävittäjäksi |trans-title=Information from IL: The Defense Forces presents the US F-35 as Finland's new fighter |url=https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/8dfecfdf-e834-4f67-931d-ad255e54d3f4 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084812/https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/8dfecfdf-e834-4f67-931d-ad255e54d3f4 |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=Iltalehti |language=fi}}</ref>
;{{GER}}
* ] – 35 F-35A ordered {{as of|2023|lc=on}},<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sabak |first=Juliusz |date=29 July 2022 |title=Niemcy: Wielki zakup F-35 z uzbrojeniem za 8,4 mld dolarów |trans-title=Germany: Major purchase of F-35 with weapons for $8.4 billion |url=https://defence24.pl/sily-zbrojne/niemcy-wielki-zakup-f-35-z-uzbrojeniem-za-84-mld-dolarow |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084432/https://defence24.pl/sily-zbrojne/niemcy-wielki-zakup-f-35-z-uzbrojeniem-za-84-mld-dolarow |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=defence24.pl |language=pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=14 December 2022 |title=Germany Becomes Latest Country to Join the F-35 Lightning II Global Team |url=https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2022-12-14-Germany-Becomes-Latest-Country-to-Join-the-F-35-Lightning-II-Global-Team |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084431/https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2022-12-14-Germany-Becomes-Latest-Country-to-Join-the-F-35-Lightning-II-Global-Team |archive-date=10 October 2023 |access-date=15 December 2022 |website=Lockheed Martin |language=en-us}}</ref> with an order for 10 more being considered {{as of|2024|lc=y}}.<ref>. Bloomberg, 7 June 2024.</ref>
; {{flag|Greece}}
* ] – 20 F-35As on order, with expected delivery in late 2027 to early 2028.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lee |first=Matthew |date=2024-01-27 |title=US approves sale of F-16 jets to Turkey, F-35s to Greece |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/01/27/us-approves-sale-of-f-16-jets-to-turkey-f-35s-to-greece/ |access-date=2024-02-02 |website=Defense News |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-25 |title=Greece signs deal to buy 20 US-made F-35 jets in major military overhaul |url=https://apnews.com/article/greece-defense-turkey-fighters-f35-military-201f3f178d9466814302b1c33651ce97 |access-date=2024-08-16 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref> An option for another additional 20 aircraft is also included.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2024-07-25-Greece-Becomes-Newest-Member-of-the-F-35-Lightning-II-Global-Alliance|title=Greece Becomes Newest Member Of The F-35 Lightning II Global Alliance|website=news.lockheedmartin.com|date=25 July 2024}}</ref>
;{{POL}}
* ] – 32 F-35A “Husarz” Block 4 jets with "Technology Refresh 3" software update and drogue parachutes were ordered on 31 January 2020.<ref name="pl_order">{{cite web |last=Adamowski |first=Jaroslaw |date=31 January 2020 |title=Poland inks $4.6 billion contract for F-35 fighter jets |url=https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/01/31/poland-inks-46-billion-contract-for-f-35-fighter-jets/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200131235510/https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/01/31/poland-inks-46-billion-contract-for-f-35-fighter-jets/ |archive-date=31 January 2020 |work=Defense News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kaleta |first=Włodzimierz |date=2023-12-08 |title=Amerykanie oblatują F-35 dla Polski |trans-title=Americans are test-flying the F-35 for Poland |url=https://www.wnp.pl/przemysl-obronny/amerykanie-oblatuja-f-35-dla-polski,782867.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240114141746/https://www.wnp.pl/przemysl-obronny/amerykanie-oblatuja-f-35-dla-polski,782867.html |archive-date=2024-01-14 |access-date=2024-01-14 |website=wnp.pl |language=pl}}</ref> The deliveries are expected to begin in 2024 and conclude in 2030. There are plans for two more squadrons consisting of 16 jets each, for a total of 32 additional F-35s.<ref>{{cite web |author=Graf |first=Jędrzej |date=27 July 2022 |title=Poland to Buy 1,000 MBTs. Minister Błaszczak Also Outlines a Plan To Procure Extra F-35s or F-15s |url=https://defence24.com/defence-policy/poland-to-buy-1000-mbts-minister-blaszczak-also-outlines-a-plan-to-procure-extra-f-35s-or-f-15s-interview |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230927235625/https://defence24.com/defence-policy/poland-to-buy-1000-mbts-minister-blaszczak-also-outlines-a-plan-to-procure-extra-f-35s-or-f-15s-interview |archive-date=27 September 2023 |access-date=10 August 2022 |publisher=Defence24}}</ref>
;{{ROU}}
*] – Romania signed the contract for 32 F-35A worth $6.5&nbsp;billion on 21 November 2024.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2024-11-21-Romania-Becomes-the-20th-Member-of-the-F-35-Global-Alliance#assets_all|title=Romania Becomes the 20th Member of the F-35 Global Alliance|website=lockheedmartin.com|date=21 November 2024}}</ref> The plan is to buy 48 F-35A aircraft in two phases – first phase of 32 and second phase of 16. The first F-35s will arrive after 2030 and will replace the current Romanian F-16 fleet between 2034 and 2040.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hotnews.ro/oficial-romania-a-semnat-contractul-cu-sua-pentru-32-de-avioane-de-vanatoare-f-35-1840422|title=OFICIAL România a semnat contractul cu SUA pentru 32 de avioane de vânătoare F-35|author=Victor Cozmei|language=ro|work=]|date=21 November 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/armata-romana-a-publicat-legea-pentru-achizitia-de-avioane-f-35-cand-vor-fi-scoase-f-16-din-dotarea-fortelor-aeriene-2909585|title=Armata Română a publicat proiectul de lege pentru achiziția de avioane F-35. Când vor fi scoase F-16 din dotarea Forțelor Aeriene|language=ro|first=Valentin|last=Stan|work=Digi24|date=28 August 2024}}</ref>
;{{SIN}}
* ] – 12 F-35Bs on order {{as of|2024|2|lc=y}} with first 4 to be delivered in 2026; The other 8 are to be delivered in 2028. 8 F-35As have been ordered, and are expected to arrive by 2030.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/singapore-buys-f35a-f35b-ng-eng-hen-2371071|title= Singapore to buy 8 F-35A fighter jets, adding to 12 F-35Bs it ordered earlier: Ng Eng Hen |newspaper = Today Online yea= 2024| access-date=2024-02-28}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Tham |first=Davina |date=24 February 2023 |title=Singapore to acquire 8 more F-35B fighter jets, growing fleet to 12 |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/f35-fighter-jet-mindef-saf-rsaf-air-force-military-defence-3302941 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240104084539/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/f35-fighter-jet-mindef-saf-rsaf-air-force-military-defence-3302941 |archive-date=4 January 2024 |access-date=25 February 2023 |agency=Channel News Asia}}</ref>
;{{SWI}}
* ] – 36 F-35A ordered to replace the current ] and ]. Deliveries will begin in 2027 and conclude in 2030.<ref>{{cite web |date=19 September 2022 |title=Air2030: Beschaffungsvertrag für die Kampfflugzeuge F-35A unterzeichnet |url=https://www.vbs.admin.ch/content/vbs-internet/de/home.detail.nsb.html/90403.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230227165235/https://www.vbs.admin.ch/content/vbs-internet/de/home.detail.nsb.html/90403.html |archive-date=27 February 2023 |access-date=19 September 2022 |publisher=Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport |language=German}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=19 September 2022 |title=Schweiz unterzeichnet Kaufvertrag für F-35 |url=https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/vertrag-zur-beschaffung-der-f-35-jets-unterschrieben-793541527081 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230306113859/https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/vertrag-zur-beschaffung-der-f-35-jets-unterschrieben-793541527081 |archive-date=6 March 2023 |access-date=19 September 2022 |publisher=Tagesanzeiger |language=German}}</ref>

===Order and approval cancellations===
;{{ROC}}
* ] – Taiwan has requested to buy the F-35 from the US. However this has been rejected by the US in fear of a critical response from China.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Carlin |first1=Maya |title=Why Won't America Sell F-35 Stealth Fighters to Taiwan? |url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-wont-america-sell-f-35-stealth-fighters-taiwan-207085 |access-date=15 June 2024 |work=The National Interest |date=28 October 2023 |language=en}}</ref> In March 2009 Taiwan again was looking to buy U.S. fifth-generation fighter jets. However, in September 2011, during a visit to the US, the Deputy Minister of National Defense of Taiwan confirmed that while the country was busy upgrading its current F-16s it was still also looking to procure a next-generation aircraft such as the F-35. This received the usual critical response from China.<ref>{{cite news |date=20 September 2011 |title=Taiwan plans to request F-35s from US |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2011/09/20/2003513701 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231208181828/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2011/09/20/2003513701 |archive-date=8 December 2023 |access-date=16 January 2012 |newspaper=Taipei Times}}</ref> Taiwan renewed its push for an F-35 purchase during ] in early 2017, again causing criticism from China.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Shim|first1=Elizabeth|title=Taiwan's plan to buy F-35 fighter jets riles China|url=https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/04/28/Taiwans-plan-to-buy-F-35-fighter-jets-riles-China/8691493405302/|website=United Press International|access-date=17 October 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20171017100017/https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/04/28/Taiwans-plan-to-buy-F-35-fighter-jets-riles-China/8691493405302/|archive-date=17 October 2017|date=28 April 2017}}</ref> In March 2018, Taiwan once again reiterated its interest in the F-35 in light of an anticipated round of arms procurement from the United States. The F-35B STOVL variant is reportedly the political favorite as it would allow the Republic of China Air Force to continue operations after its limited number of runways were to be bombed in an escalation with the ].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Yeo|first1=Mike|title=Taiwan renews interest in F-35 to counter Chinese first strike|url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/03/15/taiwan-renews-interest-in-f-35-to-counter-chinese-first-strike|website=Defense News|access-date=18 March 2018|archive-url=https://archive.today/20180318104916/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/03/15/taiwan-renews-interest-in-f-35-to-counter-chinese-first-strike/|archive-date=18 March 2018|location=Melbourne|date=16 March 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> In April 2018 however it became clear that the U.S. government was reluctant about selling the F-35 to Taiwan over worries of Chinese spies within the ], possibly compromising classified data concerning the aircraft and granting Chinese military officials access. In November 2018, it was reported that Taiwanese military leadership had abandoned the procurement of the F-35 in favor of a larger number of ] aircraft. The decision was reportedly motivated by concerns about industry independence, as well as cost and previously raised espionage concerns.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Zhezheng |first1=Hong |title=放棄F-35 我擬對美採購66架F-16V新戰機 |url=https://udn.com/news/story/10930/3506279?from=udn-catelistnews_ch2 |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181129084221/https://udn.com/news/story/10930/3506279?from=udn-catelistnews_ch2 |archive-date=29 November 2018 |language=zh |date=28 November 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>
;{{THA}}
* ] – 8 or 12 planned to replace ] in service. On 12 January 2022, Thailand's cabinet approved a budget for the first four F-35A, estimated at 13.8&nbsp;billion baht in FY2023.<ref>{{cite news |last=Nanuam |first=Wassana |date=12 January 2022 |title=Air force eyes B13.8bn jets purchase |url=https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2245879/air-force-eyes-b13-8bn-jets-purchase |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122023244/https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2245879/air-force-eyes-b13-8bn-jets-purchase |archive-date=22 January 2024 |work=Bangkok Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Nanuam |first=Wassana |date=31 December 2021 |title=Air force eyes F-35 stealth jets |url=https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2240091/air-force-eyes-f-35-stealth-jets |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122023502/https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2240091/air-force-eyes-f-35-stealth-jets |archive-date=22 January 2024 |work=Bangkok Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=31 December 2021 |title=ผบ.ทอ. ประกาศซื้อ F-35 อีกครั้ง พร้อม MUM-T เผยเสนอในปีงบ 66 นี้เลย |trans-title=Air Force Commander announces purchase of F-35 again, with MUM-T revealed to be offered in fiscal year 2023. |url=https://thaiarmedforce.com/2021/12/31/rtaf-cnc-insist-in-buying-f-35-and-mum-t/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010085006/https://thaiarmedforce.com/2021/12/31/rtaf-cnc-insist-in-buying-f-35-and-mum-t/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=thaiarmedforce |language=Thai}}</ref> On 22 May 2023, the ] implied it will turn down Thailand's bid to buy F-35 fighters, and instead offer ] and ] fighters, a Royal Thai Air Force source said.<ref>{{cite news |last=Nanuam |first=Wassana |date=22 May 2023 |title=US Pentagon set to rebuff Thailand's bid for F-35s |url=https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2575890 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230522121246/https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2575890 |archive-date=22 May 2023 |access-date=23 May 2023 |newspaper=Bangkok Post}}</ref>
;{{TUR}}
* ] – 30 were ordered,<ref name="TDP-21.06.18">{{cite web |author=Kelly |first=Fergus |date=21 June 2018 |title=Turkey receives F-35s from Lockheed, despite US Senate ban |url=https://www.thedefensepost.com/2018/06/21/turkey-f-35-lockheed-roll-out/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084841/https://www.thedefensepost.com/2018/06/21/turkey-f-35-lockheed-roll-out/ |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=The Defense Post}}</ref> of up to 100 total planned.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.f35.com/news/detail/turkey-to-order-four-more-f-35-fighter-jets |title=Turkey to Order Four More F-35 Fighter Jets |work=F-35.com |access-date=24 November 2016 |archive-date=21 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191121124549/https://www.f35.com/news/detail/turkey-to-order-four-more-f-35-fighter-jets }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=28 October 2016 |title=Turkey Plans More F-35 Orders After Receiving First Batch in 2018 |url=https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/turkey/1.749708 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226175321/https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/turkey/2016-10-28/ty-article/turkey-expects-f-35-delivery-in-2018-plans-to-order-more/0000017f-e2a8-d804-ad7f-f3fabd910000 |archive-date=26 December 2022 |newspaper=Haaretz |agency=Reuters}}</ref> Future purchases have been banned by the U.S. with contracts canceled by early 2020, following Turkey's decision to buy the ] from Russia.<ref name="turkeyban">{{Cite web |last=Pawlyk |first=Oriana |date=16 June 2019 |title=Trump: Turkey Will Be Out of F-35 Fighter Jet Program After S-400 Buy |url=https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/07/16/trump-turkey-will-be-out-f-35-fighter-jet-program-after-s-400-buy.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230316044127/https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/07/16/trump-turkey-will-be-out-f-35-fighter-jet-program-after-s-400-buy.html |archive-date=16 March 2023 |website=Military.com}}</ref> Six of Turkey's 30 ordered F-35As were completed {{as of|2019|lc=y}} (they are still kept in a hangar in the United States {{as of|2023|lc=y}}<ref name="FlightGlobal-23.01.2023">{{cite web |author=Finnerty |first=Ryan |date=23 January 2023 |title=US, Turkish defence officials meet for second round of F-35 discussions |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/us-turkish-defence-officials-meet-for-second-round-of-f-35-discussions/151753.article |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230123200419/https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/us-turkish-defence-officials-meet-for-second-round-of-f-35-discussions/151753.article |archive-date=23 January 2023 |website=FlightGlobal}}</ref><ref name="Janes-24.01.2023">{{cite web |author=Jennings |first=Gareth |date=24 January 2023 |title=US, Turkey continue talks to settle F-35 dispute |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/us-turkey-continue-talks-to-settle-f-35-dispute |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230803200551/http://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/us-turkey-continue-talks-to-settle-f-35-dispute |archive-date=3 August 2023 |website=Janes}}</ref> and so far haven't been transferred to the USAF, despite a modification in the 2020 Fiscal Year defense budget by the U.S. Congress which gives authority to do so if necessary),<ref name="TRT_World-21.07.2020"/><ref name="DefenseNews-20.07.2020"/> and two more were at the assembly line in 2020.<ref name="TRT_World-21.07.2020">{{cite web |date=21 July 2020 |title=US to buy eight F-35 jets originally built for Turkey |url=https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/us-to-buy-eight-f-35-jets-originally-built-for-turkey-38301 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231209075522/https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/us-to-buy-eight-f-35-jets-originally-built-for-turkey-38301 |archive-date=9 December 2023 |website= |publisher=] |agency=Reuters}}</ref><ref name="DefenseNews-20.07.2020">{{cite web |author=Insinna |first=Valerie |date=21 July 2020 |title=It's official: US Air Force to buy Turkish F-35s |url=https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020/07/20/its-official-us-air-force-to-buy-turkish-f-35s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200721135043/https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020/07/20/its-official-us-air-force-to-buy-turkish-f-35s/ |archive-date=21 July 2020 |website=Defense News}}</ref> The first four F-35As were delivered to ] in 2018<ref>{{cite web |date=21 June 2018 |title=F-35'lerin ilk teslimat töreni ABD'de gerçekleşti |trans-title=The first delivery ceremony of F-35s took place in the USA |url=https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/f-35lerin-ilk-teslimat-toreni-abdde-gerceklesti-371160.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010085005/https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/f-35lerin-ilk-teslimat-toreni-abdde-gerceklesti-371160.html |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=trthaber.com |publisher=] |language=Turkish}}</ref> and 2019<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Stone |first1=Mike |last2=Ali |first2=Idrees |date=4 April 2019 |title=Turkish F-35 delivered to training base in Arizona, official says |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-turkey-f35-arizona-idUSKCN1RG242 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405164712/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-turkey-f35-arizona-idUSKCN1RG242 |archive-date=5 April 2023 |access-date=17 July 2019 |work=Reuters |language=en}}</ref> for the training of Turkish pilots.<ref>{{cite web |date=23 May 2018 |title=Turkish F35 takes flight |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDq7Ewkf6R4 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230304231504/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDq7Ewkf6R4 |archive-date=4 March 2023 |website=YouTube |publisher=Kaparzo1453 |type=Video |access-date=7 March 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=26 February 2019 |title=Turkish Air Force pilots training with Turkish F-35As at Luke Air Force Base |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQzTgHYtm30 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230304231506/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQzTgHYtm30 |archive-date=4 March 2023 |website=YouTube |publisher=Tonk298 |type=Video |access-date=7 March 2023 }}</ref> On 20 July 2020, the U.S. government had formally approved the seizure of eight F-35As originally bound for Turkey and their transfer to the USAF, together with a contract to modify them to USAF specifications.<ref>{{cite web |author=Tirpak |first=John A. |date=20 July 2020 |title=USAF Nets Turkey's F-35s Under $861.7M Contract Mod |url=https://www.airforcemag.com/usaf-nets-turkeys-f-35s-under-861-7m-contract-mod/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015112104/https://www.airandspaceforces.com/usaf-nets-turkeys-f-35s-under-861-7m-contract-mod/ |archive-date=15 October 2023 |website=Air & Space Forces Magazine}}</ref> The U.S. has not refunded the $1.4&nbsp;billion payment made by Turkey for purchasing the F-35A fighters {{as of|2023|1|lc=y}}.<ref name="FlightGlobal-23.01.2023"/><ref name="Janes-24.01.2023"/> On 1 February 2024, the United States expressed willingness to readmit Turkey into the F-35 program if Turkey agrees to give up its S-400 system.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://ca.news.yahoo.com/us-ready-greenlight-turkey-f-111400491.html | title=US ready to greenlight Turkey's F-35 fighter jet program if Ankara gives up Russian S-300s and S-400s | date=February 2024 | access-date=3 July 2024 | archive-date=2 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240202005500/https://ca.news.yahoo.com/us-ready-greenlight-turkey-f-111400491.html | url-status=dead }}</ref>
;{{UAE}}
* ] – Up to 50 F-35As planned.<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 November 2020 |title=White House moves forward with sale of F-35s to UAE |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/29/white-house-moves-forward-with-f-35-sale-to-uae |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010085005/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/29/white-house-moves-forward-with-f-35-sale-to-uae |archive-date=10 October 2023 |publisher=Al Jazeera}}</ref> But on 27 January 2021, the Biden administration temporarily suspended the F-35 sales to the UAE.<ref>{{Cite news |date=27 January 2021 |title=Biden suspends F-35 sale to UAE |url=https://www.dailysabah.com/business/defense/biden-suspends-f-35-sale-to-uae |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084758/https://www.dailysabah.com/business/defense/biden-suspends-f-35-sale-to-uae |archive-date=10 October 2023 |work=]}}</ref> After pausing the bill to review the sale, the Biden administration confirmed to move forward with the deal on 13 April 2021.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Axelrod |first1=Tal |title=Biden to move ahead with $23 billion UAE weapons sale approved by Trump |url=https://thehill.com/policy/defense/548102-biden-to-move-ahead-with-23-billion-uae-weapons-sale-approved-by-trump |website=The Hill |access-date=14 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414082725/https://thehill.com/policy/defense/548102-biden-to-move-ahead-with-23-billion-uae-weapons-sale-approved-by-trump |archive-date=14 April 2021 |date=13 April 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> In December 2021 UAE withdrew from purchasing F-35s as they did not agree to the additional terms of the transaction from the US.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Ghantous |first1=Ghaida |last2=Ponnezhath |first2=Maria |last3=Stone |first3=Mike |last4=Ali |first4=Idrees |date=14 December 2021 |title=UAE told the U.S. it will suspend talks on F-35 jets -Emirati official |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/uae-threatens-pull-out-23-bln-f-35-drone-deal-with-us-wsj-2021-12-14/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240122025156/https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/uae-threatens-pull-out-23-bln-f-35-drone-deal-with-us-wsj-2021-12-14/ |archive-date=22 January 2024 |newspaper=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Palowski |first=Jakub |date=15 December 2021 |title=Emiraty bez F-35? Porozumienie zerwane |trans-title=Emirates without F-35? Agreement broken |url=https://defence24.pl/przemysl/emiraty-bez-f-35-dubaj-nie-zgadza-sie-na-warunki-bidena-komentarz |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010084841/https://defence24.pl/przemysl/emiraty-bez-f-35-dubaj-nie-zgadza-sie-na-warunki-bidena-komentarz |archive-date=10 October 2023 |website=defence24.pl |language=pl}}</ref> On 14 September 2024, a senior UAE official said that the United Arab Emirates does not expect to resume talks with the U.S. about the F-35.<ref>{{Cite web |title=UAE rules out reopening F-35 talks with US |url=https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uae-rules-out-reopening-f-35-talks-us |access-date=2024-09-18 |website=Middle East Eye |language=en}}</ref>

==Accidents and notable incidents==
{{Main|List of accidents and incidents involving the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II}}

Various models of the F-35 have been involved in incidents since 2014. They have often involved operator error or mechanical issues, which has set back the program.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Marrow |first=Michael |date=2024-06-05 |title=What a crashed jet means for an F-35 program already thin on test planes |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2024/06/what-a-crashed-jet-means-for-an-f-35-program-already-thin-on-test-planes/ |access-date=2024-06-15 |website=Breaking Defense |language=en-US }}{{Dead link|date=November 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In comparison to most military aircraft, however, it is described as being safe.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-06-04 |title=An F-35 Went Down in New Mexico. It's Still One of the Safest Planes in the Skies. |url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a60962511/f-35-went-down-in-new-mexico/ |access-date=2024-06-15 |website=Popular Mechanics |language=en-US}}</ref>

==Specifications (F-35A)==
]

{{Aircraft specs
|ref=Lockheed Martin: F-35 specifications,<ref name="LM_F-35A_page">{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35A-ctol-variant.html |title=F-35A Conventional Takeoff and Landing Variant|access-date=13 July 2012 |last=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317113904/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35A-ctol-variant.html |archive-date=17 March 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/478441/f-35a-lightning-ii-conventional-takeoff-and-landing-variant/ |title=F-35A Lightning II |website=af.mil|access-date=25 November 2017}}</ref><ref name=lockf35B>{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35b-stovl-variant.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317114148/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35b-stovl-variant.html |title=F-35B Short Takeoff/Vertical Landing Variant |archive-date=17 March 2011 |website=Lockheed Martin |access-date=13 July 2012}}</ref><ref name=lockf35C>{{cite web |url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35c-cv-variant.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317173004/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/f35/f-35c-cv-variant.html |title=F-35C Carrier Variant |website=Lockheed Martin |archive-date=17 March 2011 |access-date=13 July 2012}}</ref> Lockheed Martin: F-35 weaponry,<ref name=weaponry>{{cite web |url=https://www.f35.com/about/carrytheload/weaponry |title=F-35 Weaponry |website=F35.com |publisher=Lockheed Martin |access-date=28 February 2019 |archive-date=18 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418155950/https://f35.com/about/carrytheload/weaponry }}</ref> Lockheed Martin: F-35 Program Status,<ref name="LM_F-35_Status_Fast_Facts">{{cite web |url=http://f-35.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/F-35-Fast-Facts-March-13-2012.pdf |title=F-35 Lightning II Program Status and Fast Facts |website=F-35.ca |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130524200620/http://f-35.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/F-35-Fast-Facts-March-13-2012.pdf |archive-date=24 May 2013 |publisher=Lockheed Martin |date=13 March 2012}}</ref> F-35 Program brief,<ref name="F-35_prog_brief_Sept2006" /> FY2019 Select Acquisition Report (SAR),<ref name="FY2019 President's Budget Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)">{{cite web |url=https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/18-F-1016_DOC_44_DOD_F-35_SAR_Dec_2017.pdf |title=FY2019 President's Budget Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35) |website=esd.whs.mil |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190310034412/https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/18-F-1016_DOC_44_DOD_F-35_SAR_Dec_2017.pdf |archive-date=10 March 2019 }}</ref> Director of Operational Test & Evaluation<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2016/pdf/dod/2016f35jsf.pdf#page=15 |title=FY2016 DOT&E Report – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35) |year=2017 |website=dote.osd.mil|page=15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170713055540/http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2016/pdf/dod/2016f35jsf.pdf#page=15 |archive-date=13 July 2017 }}</ref>
|prime units?=kts
<!--
General characteristics -->
|genhide=
|crew=1
|length ft=51.4
|length in=
|length note=
|span ft=35
|span in=
|span note=
|height ft=14.4
|height in=
|height note=
|wing area sqft=460
|wing area note=
|aspect ratio=2.66
|airfoil=
|empty weight lb=29300
|empty weight note=
|gross weight lb=49540
|gross weight note=
|max takeoff weight lb=65918
|max takeoff weight note=<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.airforce.gov.au/aircraft/f-35a-lightning-ii |title=F-35A Lightning II |author=<!--Not stated--> |date= |website= |publisher=Royal Australian Air Force |access-date=2022-11-14 |quote=}}</ref>
|fuel capacity={{cvt|18250|lb|0}} internal
|more general=
<!--
Powerplant -->
|eng1 number=1
|eng1 name=]
|eng1 type=afterburning ]
|eng1 lbf=28000
|eng1 kn=125
|eng1 note=
|eng1 lbf-ab=43000
|eng1 kn-ab=191
<!--
Performance -->
|perfhide=

|max speed kts=
|max speed mach=1.6 at high altitude
**Mach 1.06, {{convert|700|knots|mph km/h|0}} at sea level
|cruise speed kts=
|cruise speed note=
|stall speed kts=
|stall speed note=
|never exceed speed kts=
|never exceed speed note=
|range nmi=1500
|range note=
|combat range nmi=669
|combat range note=interdiction mission (air-to-surface) on internal fuel
** {{cvt|760|nmi|mi km}}, air-to-air configuration on internal fuel<ref name="Gary North Vice President Lockheed Martin – Presentation to Israel (2016)">{{cite web |url=http://www.fisher.org.il/2016/Adir%20Powepoint/GaryNorth.pdf#page=7 |work=F-35: The Future is Now |publisher=Fisher.org.il |title=Long Combat Radius |first=Gary |last=North |date=April 2016 |access-date=9 June 2016 |archive-date=9 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160609054858/http://www.fisher.org.il/2016/Adir%20Powepoint/GaryNorth.pdf#page=7 }}</ref>
|ferry range nmi=
|ferry range note=
|endurance=<!-- if range unknown -->
|ceiling ft=50000
|ceiling note=
|g limits=+9.0
|roll rate=<!-- aerobatic -->
|glide ratio=<!-- sailplanes -->
|climb rate ftmin=
|climb rate note=
|time to altitude=
|wing loading lb/sqft=107.7
|wing loading note=at gross weight
|fuel consumption lb/mi=
|thrust/weight=0.87 at gross weight (1.07 at loaded weight with 50% internal fuel)
|more performance=
<!--
Armament -->
|guns= 1 × ] ] 4-barrel ], 180 rounds{{refn|F-35B and F-35C have the cannon in an external pod with 220 rounds.|group=N}}
|hardpoints=4 × internal stations, 6 × external stations on wings
|hardpoint capacity={{convert|5700|lb}} internal, {{convert|15000|lb}} external, {{convert|18000|lb}} total weapons payload
|hardpoint missiles=<br />
*** ]s:
**** ]
**** ]
**** ]
**** ] (being integrated)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.airandspaceforces.com/air-force-developing-amraam-replacement-to-counter-china/|title=Air Force Developing AMRAAM Replacement to Counter China|date=20 June 2019}}</ref>
**** ] (Block 4, for F-35B, not before 2027)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/integration-of-meteor-missile-on-f-35b-slips-to-2027/|title=Integration of Meteor missile on F-35B slips to 2027|first=George|last=Allison|date=21 February 2022}}</ref><ref name="clipped-fin" /><ref name="integbudget">{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/italy-uk-to-complete-meteor-spear-missile-integration-on-f-35-fleets/145515.article|title=Italy, UK to complete Meteor, Spear missile integration on F-35 fleets|first=Craig|last=Hoyle2021-09-17T10:33:00+01:00|website=FlightGlobal}}</ref>
*** ]s:
**** ] (Block 4)
**** ]<ref name="JSFrange" />
**** ]
**** ] (Block 4, in development, integration contracted)<ref name="mbda spear" /><ref name="integbudget"/>
**** ] (SiAW)<ref name= siawPhase2 >Michael Marrow IOC 2026</ref>
*** ]s:
**** ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/07/03/the-navys-advanced-weapons-shopping-list/ |title=The Navy's advanced weapons shopping list |first=Philip |last=Ewing |date=3 July 2012 |website=DoD buzz.com |access-date=2 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120906070100/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/07/03/the-navys-advanced-weapons-shopping-list/ |archive-date=6 September 2012}}</ref> (being integrated)
**** ] (being integrated)<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/update-jsm-successfully-released-from-f-35a|title=Update: JSM successfully released from F-35A|website=Janes.com|date=12 April 2021 }}</ref>
|hardpoint bombs=<br />
*** ]
*** ]
*** ] ]:
**** ]
**** ]
**** ]
*** ] nuclear bomb<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defense.gov/npr/docs/2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf |title=Nuclear Posture Review Report |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141207170603/http://www.defense.gov/npr/docs/2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf |archive-date=7 December 2014 |website=U.S. Department of Defense |location=Washington, D.C. |date=April 2010}}</ref><ref name="B61_certified" />
|rockets=
|avionics= *] ''or'' ] (Lot 17 onwards) ] radar<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/air/an-apg-81-active-electronically-scanned-array-aesa-fire-control-radar|title=AN/APG-81 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Fire Control Radar|website=Northrop Grumman}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/northrop-grumman-developing-the-next-generation-radar-for-the-f-35-lightning-ii |title=Northrop Grumman Developing the Next Generation Radar for the F-35 Lightning II |last= |first= |date= |website=|publisher= |access-date=2023-02-04 |quote=}}</ref>
* AN/AAQ-40 Electro-Optical Targeting System<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/f-35-lightning-ii-eots.html|title=F-35 Electro Optical Targeting System (EOTS)|website=Lockheed Martin}}</ref>
* ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.raytheonintelligenceandspace.com/what-we-do/air-dominance/eodas|title=Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System &#124; Raytheon Intelligence & Space|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230324232606/https://www.raytheonintelligenceandspace.com/what-we-do/air-dominance/eodas|archive-date= 24 March 2023|url-status= dead}}</ref>
* AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda ]/] system<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.baesystems.com/en-media/uploadFile/20210404061430/1434583878736.pdf|title= AN/ASQ-239 Electronic warfare/countermeasure system|access-date= 16 May 2023|author= BAE Systems|author-link= BAE Systems|work= www.baesystems.com|date= November 2018|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230514010902/https://www.baesystems.com/en-media/uploadFile/20210404061430/1434583878736.pdf|archive-date= 14 May 2023|url-status= live}}</ref>
* AN/ASQ-242 CNI suite, which includes
** ] ] (MADL) communication system
** ] data link
** ]
** An ] interrogator and transponder
** ]
** AM, VHF, UHF AM, and UHF FM Radio
** GUARD survival radio
** A ]
** An ]
** A ] system
** Instrument carrier landing system
** A ]
** ] JVMF/VMF
}}

===Differences between variants===
{|class="wikitable"
|-
!
!F-35A<br />]
!F-35B<br />]
!F-35C<br />] ]
|-
|Length
|{{convert|51.4|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|51.2|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|51.5|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|-
|Wingspan
|{{convert|35|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|35|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|43|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|-
|Height
|{{convert|14.4|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|14.3|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|{{convert|14.7|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}}
|-
|Wing Area
|{{convert|460|sqft|sqm|abbr=on|sigfig=4}}
|{{convert|460|sqft|sqm|abbr=on|sigfig=4}}
|{{convert|668|sqft|sqm|abbr=on|sigfig=4}}
|-
|Empty weight
|{{convert|28999|lb|kg|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|32472|lb|kg|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|34581|lb|kg|abbr=on}}
|-
|Internal fuel
|{{convert|18250|lb|kg|0|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|13500|lb|kg|0|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|19750|lb|kg|0|abbr=on}}
|-
|Weapons payload
|{{convert|18000|lb|kg|-1|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|15000|lb|kg|-1|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|18000|lb|kg|-1|abbr=on}}
|-
|Max takeoff weight
|{{convert|70000|lb|kg|abbr=on|sigfig=3}} class
|{{convert|60000|lb|kg|abbr=on|sigfig=3}} class
|{{convert|70000|lb|kg|abbr=on|sigfig=3}} class
|-
|Range
|>{{convert|1200|nmi|km|abbr=on}}
|>{{convert|900|nmi|km|abbr=on}}
|>{{convert|1200|nmi|km|abbr=on}}
|-
|Combat radius on<br />internal fuel
|{{convert|669|nmi|km|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|505|nmi|km|abbr=on}}
|{{convert|670|nmi|km|abbr=on|sigfig=4}}
|-
|Thrust/weight <br />{{•}} full fuel: <br />{{•}} 50% fuel:
|<br />0.87<br />1.07
|<br />0.90<br />1.04
|<br />0.75<br />0.91
|-
|g limit
|<big>+</big>9.0
|<big>+</big>7.0
|<big>+</big>7.5
|}

== Appearances in media ==
<!--===============({{NoMoreCruft}})===============-->
<!-- Please READ ] and ] before adding any "Popular culture" items.

Please do not add the many minor appearances of the aircraft. This section is only for major cultural appearances where the aircraft plays a MAJOR part in the story line, or has an "especially notable" role in what is listed. A verifiable source proving the appearance's notability may be required. Random cruft, including ALL Ace Combat, Battlefield 2, Tom Clancy's HAWX, and Metal Gear Solid appearances, along with ALL anime/fiction lookalike speculation, WILL BE removed.

If your item has been removed, please discuss it on the talk page FIRST. A verifiable source proving the appearance's notability may be required. If a consensus is reached to include your item, a regular editor of this page will add it back. Thank you for your cooperation.-->
<!--===============({{NoMoreCruft}})===============-->
<!-- READ notes below "Popular culture" before adding anything to this section. -->
{{Main|Aircraft in fiction#F-35 Lightning II}}

== See also ==
{{Portal|Aviation}}
{{aircontent
|see also=<!-- related articles that do not fit the specific entries: -->
|related=<!-- designs which were developed into or from this aircraft: -->
* ] – Concept demonstrator aircraft for Joint Strike Fighter program
|similar aircraft=<!-- aircraft that are of similar Role, Era, and Capability this design: -->
* ] – Chinese fifth-generation fighter aircraft
* ] – Indian fifth-generation fighter under development by ] and ]
* ] – Advanced multirole fighter aircraft under development by South Korea and Indonesia
* ] – American fifth-generation air superiority fighter
* ] – Chinese fifth-generation fighter aircraft
* ] – Russian fifth-generation fighter aircraft
* ] – Russian single engine fifth-generation fighter under development by ]
* ] – Turkish fifth-generation fighter under development by ]
|lists=<!-- relevant lists that this aircraft appears in: -->
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
<!-- See ] for more explanation of these fields. -->
}}
{{Clear}}

== Notes ==
{{Reflist|group=N}}

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

=== Bibliography ===
* {{cite book |last=Hamstra |first=Jeffrey |editor1-first=Jeffrey W. |editor1-last=Hamstra |date=2019 |title=The F-35 Lightning II: From Concept to Cockpit |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/4.105678 |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) |doi=10.2514/4.105678 |isbn=978-1-62410-566-1|s2cid=212996081 }}
* {{cite book |last=Keijsper |first=Gerald |title=Lockheed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter |location=London |publisher=Pen & Sword Aviation |date=2007 |isbn=978-1-84415-631-3}}
* Lake, Jon. "The West's Great Hope". '']'', December 2010.
* {{cite book |last=Polmar |first=Norman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8MwyTX-iA2wC&pg=PA397 |title=The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet |location=Annapolis, ] |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-59114-685-8}}

== Further reading ==
* {{cite book |last=Borgu |first=Aldo |title=A Big Deal: Australia's Future Air Combat Capability |location=Canberra |publisher=Australian Strategic Policy Institute |date=2004 |isbn=1-920722-25-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Spick |first=Mike |title=The Illustrated Directory of Fighters |location=London |publisher=Salamander |date=2002 |isbn=1-84065-384-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Winchester |first=Jim |year=2005 |title=Concept Aircraft: Prototypes, X-Planes, and Experimental Aircraft |isbn=978-1-59223-480-6 |publisher=Thunder Bay Press |location=San Diego, CA |oclc=636459025}}

== External links ==
{{Commons and category|F-35 Lightning II}}
{{Wikiquote}}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071027111123/http://www.jsf.mil/ |date=27 October 2007 }}
*
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100307083758/http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.display&key=334E7A23-1F02-4669-843A-89222BEEDC01 |date=7 March 2010 }}
*

{{Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II}}
{{Lockheed Martin aircraft}}
{{US fighters}}
{{Italian military aircraft}}
{{Stealth aircraft}}
{{Authority control}}

]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 25 December 2024

American stealth multirole fighter aircraft

"F35" redirects here. For other uses, see F35 (disambiguation).

F-35 Lightning II
U.S. Air Force F-35A in flight over the coast of Florida
General information
TypeMultirole strike fighter
National originUnited States
ManufacturerLockheed Martin
StatusIn service
Primary usersUnited States Air Force (USAF)
Number built1,000 as of January 2024
History
Manufactured2006–present
Introduction date
  • F-35B: 31 July 2015 (USMC)
  • F-35A: 2 August 2016 (USAF)
  • F-35C: 28 February 2019 (USN)
First flight15 December 2006; 18 years ago (2006-12-15) (F-35A)
Developed fromLockheed Martin X-35

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is an American family of single-seat, single-engine, supersonic stealth strike fighters. A multirole combat aircraft designed for both air superiority and strike missions, it also has electronic warfare and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Lockheed Martin is the prime F-35 contractor with principal partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. The aircraft has three main variants: the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35A, the short take-off and vertical-landing (STOVL) F-35B, and the carrier variant (CV) catapult-assisted take-off but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) F-35C.

The aircraft descends from the Lockheed Martin X-35, which in 2001 beat the Boeing X-32 to win the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program intended to replace the F-16, F/A-18, and the Harrier jump jet, among others. Its development is principally funded by the United States, with additional funding from program partner countries from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and close U.S. allies, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, and formerly Turkey. Several other countries have also ordered, or are considering ordering, the aircraft. The program has drawn criticism for its unprecedented size, complexity, ballooning costs, and delayed deliveries. The acquisition strategy of concurrent production of the aircraft while it was still in development and testing led to expensive design changes and retrofits. As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

The F-35 first flew in 2006 and entered service with the U.S. Marine Corps F-35B in July 2015, followed by the U.S. Air Force F-35A in August 2016 and the U.S. Navy F-35C in February 2019. The aircraft was first used in combat in 2018 by the Israeli Air Force. The U.S. plans to buy 2,456 F-35s through 2044, which will represent the bulk of the crewed tactical aviation of the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps for several decades; the aircraft is planned to be a cornerstone of NATO and U.S.-allied air power and to operate to 2070.

Development

Main article: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II development

Program origins

The F-35 was the product of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, which was the merger of various combat aircraft programs from the 1980s and 1990s. One progenitor program was the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Advanced Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) which ran from 1983 to 1994; ASTOVL aimed to develop a Harrier jump jet replacement for the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and the UK Royal Navy. Under one of ASTOVL's classified programs, the Supersonic STOVL Fighter (SSF), Lockheed Skunk Works conducted research for a stealthy supersonic STOVL fighter intended for both U.S. Air Force (USAF) and USMC; among key STOVL technologies explored was the shaft-driven lift fan (SDLF) system. Lockheed's concept was a single-engine canard delta aircraft weighing about 24,000 lb (11,000 kg) empty. ASTOVL was rechristened as the Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) in 1993 and involved Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, and Boeing.

The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 caused considerable reductions in Department of Defense (DoD) spending and subsequent restructuring. In 1993, the Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program emerged following the cancellation of the USAF's Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) and U.S. Navy's (USN) Advanced Attack/Fighter (A/F-X) programs. MRF, a program for a relatively affordable F-16 replacement, was scaled back and delayed due to post–Cold War defense posture easing F-16 fleet usage and thus extending its service life as well as increasing budget pressure from the F-22 Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program. The A/F-X, initially known as the Advanced-Attack (A-X), began in 1991 as the USN's follow-on to the Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) program for an A-6 replacement; the ATA's resulting A-12 Avenger II had been canceled due to technical problems and cost overruns in 1991. In the same year, the termination of the Naval Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF), a naval development of USAF's ATF program to replace the F-14, resulted in additional fighter capability being added to A-X, which was then renamed A/F-X. Amid increased budget pressure, the DoD's Bottom-Up Review (BUR) in September 1993 announced MRF's and A/F-X's cancellations, with applicable experience brought to the emerging JAST program. JAST was not meant to develop a new aircraft, but rather to develop requirements, mature technologies, and demonstrate concepts for advanced strike warfare.

As JAST progressed, the need for concept demonstrator aircraft by 1996 emerged, which would coincide with the full-scale flight demonstrator phase of ASTOVL/CALF. Because the ASTOVL/CALF concept appeared to align with the JAST charter, the two programs were eventually merged in 1994 under the JAST name, with the program now serving the USAF, USMC, and USN. JAST was subsequently renamed to Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1995, with STOVL submissions by McDonnell Douglas, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing. The JSF was expected to eventually replace large numbers of multi-role and strike fighters in the inventories of the US and its allies, including the Harrier, F-16, F/A-18, A-10, and F-117.

International participation is a key aspect of the JSF program, starting with United Kingdom participation in the ASTOVL program. Many international partners requiring modernization of their air forces were interested in the JSF. The United Kingdom joined JAST/JSF as a founding member in 1995 and thus became the only Tier 1 partner of the JSF program; Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Canada, Australia, and Turkey joined the program during the Concept Demonstration Phase (CDP), with Italy and the Netherlands being Tier 2 partners and the rest Tier 3. Consequently, the aircraft was developed in cooperation with international partners and available for export.

JSF competition

Main articles: Joint Strike Fighter program and Lockheed Martin X-35

Boeing and Lockheed Martin were selected in early 1997 for CDP, with their concept demonstrator aircraft designated X-32 and X-35 respectively; the McDonnell Douglas team was eliminated and Northrop Grumman and British Aerospace joined the Lockheed Martin team. Each firm would produce two prototype air vehicles to demonstrate conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), carrier takeoff and landing (CV), and STOVL. Lockheed Martin's design would make use of the work on the SDLF system conducted under the ASTOVL/CALF program. The key aspect of the X-35 that enabled STOVL operation, the SDLF system consists of the lift fan in the forward center fuselage that could be activated by engaging a clutch that connects the driveshaft to the turbines and thus augmenting the thrust from the engine's swivel nozzle. Research from prior aircraft incorporating similar systems, such as the Convair Model 200, Rockwell XFV-12, and Yakovlev Yak-141, were also taken into consideration. By contrast, Boeing's X-32 employed direct lift system that the augmented turbofan would be reconfigured to when engaging in STOVL operation.

X-35B flying over Edwards Air Force Base

Lockheed Martin's commonality strategy was to replace the STOVL variant's SDLF with a fuel tank and the aft swivel nozzle with a two-dimensional thrust vectoring nozzle for the CTOL variant. STOVL operation is made possible through a patented shaft-driven LiftFan propulsion system. This would enable identical aerodynamic configuration for the STOVL and CTOL variants, while the CV variant would have an enlarged wing to reduce landing speed for carrier recovery. Due to aerodynamic characteristics and carrier recovery requirements from the JAST merger, the design configuration settled on a conventional tail compared to the canard delta design from the ASTOVL/CALF; notably, the conventional tail configuration offers much lower risk for carrier recovery compared to the ASTOVL/CALF canard configuration, which was designed without carrier compatibility in mind. This enabled greater commonality between all three variants, as the commonality goal was important at this design stage. Lockheed Martin's prototypes would consist of the X-35A for demonstrating CTOL before converting it to the X-35B for STOVL demonstration and the larger-winged X-35C for CV compatibility demonstration.

The X-35A first flew on 24 October 2000 and conducted flight tests for subsonic and supersonic flying qualities, handling, range, and maneuver performance. After 28 flights, the aircraft was then converted into the X-35B for STOVL testing, with key changes including the addition of the SDLF, the three-bearing swivel module (3BSM), and roll-control ducts. The X-35B would successfully demonstrate the SDLF system by performing stable hover, vertical landing, and short takeoff in less than 500 ft (150 m). The X-35C first flew on 16 December 2000 and conducted field landing carrier practice tests.

On 26 October 2001, Lockheed Martin was declared the winner and was awarded the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) contract; Pratt & Whitney was separately awarded a development contract for the F135 engine for the JSF. The F-35 designation, which was out of sequence with standard DoD numbering, was allegedly determined on the spot by program manager Major General Mike Hough; this came as a surprise even to Lockheed Martin, which had expected the F-24 designation for the JSF.

Design and production

Engineer handling a metallic scale model of jet fighter in wind-tunnel
An F-35 wind tunnel testing model in 16-foot (5 m) transonic wind tunnel at the Arnold Engineering Development Center

As the JSF program moved into the System Development and Demonstration phase, the X-35 demonstrator design was modified to create the F-35 combat aircraft. The forward fuselage was lengthened by 5 inches (13 cm) to make room for mission avionics, while the horizontal stabilizers were moved 2 inches (5.1 cm) aft to retain balance and control. The diverterless supersonic inlet changed from a four-sided to a three-sided cowl shape and was moved 30 inches (76 cm) aft. The fuselage section was fuller, the top surface raised by 1 inch (2.5 cm) along the centerline and the lower surface bulged to accommodate weapons bays. Following the designation of the X-35 prototypes, the three variants were designated F-35A (CTOL), F-35B (STOVL), and F-35C (CV), all with a design service life of 8,000 hours. Prime contractor Lockheed Martin performs overall systems integration and final assembly and checkout (FACO) at Air Force Plant 4 in Fort Worth, Texas, while Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems supply components for mission systems and airframe.

Adding the systems of a fighter aircraft added weight. The F-35B gained the most, largely due to a 2003 decision to enlarge the weapons bays for commonality between variants; the total weight growth was reportedly up to 2,200 pounds (1,000 kg), over 8%, causing all STOVL key performance parameter (KPP) thresholds to be missed. In December 2003, the STOVL Weight Attack Team (SWAT) was formed to reduce the weight increase; changes included thinned airframe members, smaller weapons bays and vertical stabilizers, less thrust fed to the roll-post outlets, and redesigning the wing-mate joint, electrical elements, and the airframe immediately aft of the cockpit. The inlet was also revised to accommodate more powerful, greater mass flow engines. Many changes from the SWAT effort were applied to all three variants for commonality. By September 2004, these efforts had reduced the F-35B's weight by over 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg), while the F-35A and F-35C were reduced in weight by 2,400 pounds (1,100 kg) and 1,900 pounds (860 kg) respectively. The weight reduction work cost $6.2 billion and caused an 18-month delay.

The first F-35A prototype, AA-1, being towed to its inauguration ceremony on 7 July 2006

The first F-35A, designated AA-1, was rolled out at Fort Worth on 19 February 2006 and first flew on 15 December 2006 with chief test pilot Jon S. Beesley at the controls. In 2006, the F-35 was given the name "Lightning II" after the Lockheed P-38 Lightning of World War II. Some USAF pilots have nicknamed the aircraft "Panther" instead, and other nicknames include "Fat Amy" and "Battle Penguin".

The aircraft's software was developed as six releases, or Blocks, for SDD. The first two Blocks, 1A and 1B, readied the F-35 for initial pilot training and multi-level security. Block 2A improved the training capabilities, while 2B was the first combat-ready release planned for the USMC's Initial Operating Capability (IOC). Block 3i retains the capabilities of 2B while having new Technology Refresh 2 (TR-2) hardware and was planned for the USAF's IOC. The final release for SDD, Block 3F, would have full flight envelope and all baseline combat capabilities. Alongside software releases, each block also incorporates avionics hardware updates and air vehicle improvements from flight and structural testing. In what is known as "concurrency", some low rate initial production (LRIP) aircraft lots would be delivered in early Block configurations and eventually upgraded to Block 3F once development is complete. After 17,000 flight test hours, the final flight for the SDD phase was completed in April 2018. Like the F-22, the F-35 has been targeted by cyberattacks and technology theft efforts, as well as potential vulnerabilities in the integrity of the supply chain.

The first F-35C flight sciences aircraft, CF-01, conducts a test flight over Chesapeake Bay in February 2011.

Testing found several major problems: early F-35B airframes were vulnerable to premature cracking, the F-35C arrestor hook design was unreliable, fuel tanks were too vulnerable to lightning strikes, the helmet display had problems, and more. Software was repeatedly delayed due to its unprecedented scope and complexity. In 2009, the DoD Joint Estimate Team (JET) estimated that the program was 30 months behind the public schedule. In 2011, the program was "re-baselined"; that is, its cost and schedule goals were changed, pushing the IOC from the planned 2010 to July 2015. The decision to simultaneously test, fix defects, and begin production was criticized as inefficient; in 2014, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Frank Kendall called it "acquisition malpractice". The three variants shared just 25% of their parts, far below the anticipated commonality of 70%.

The program received considerable criticism for cost overruns and for the total projected lifetime cost, as well as quality management shortcomings by contractors. As of August 2023, the program was 80% over budget and 10 years late.

The JSF program was expected to cost about $200 billion for acquisition in base-year 2002 dollars when SDD was awarded in 2001. As early as 2005, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) had identified major program risks in cost and schedule. The costly delays strained the relationship between the Pentagon and contractors. By 2017, delays and cost overruns had pushed the F-35 program's expected acquisition costs to $406.5 billion, with total lifetime cost (i.e., to 2070) to $1.5 trillion in then-year dollars which also includes operations and maintenance. The F-35A's unit cost (not including engine) for LRIP Lot 13 was $79.2 million in base-year 2012 dollars. Delays in development and operational test and evaluation, including integration into the Joint Simulation Environment, pushed full-rate production decision from the end of 2019 to March 2024, although actual production rate had already approached the full rate by 2020; the combined full rate at the Fort Worth, Italy, and Japan FACO plants is 156 aircraft annually.

Upgrades and further development

Sailors prepare to taxi an F-35C Lightning II on aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson.

The F-35 is expected to be continually upgraded over its lifetime. The first combat-capable Block 2B configuration, which had basic air-to-air and strike capabilities, was declared ready by the USMC in July 2015. The Block 3F configuration began operational test and evaluation (OT&E) in December 2018 and its completion in late 2023 concluded SDD in March 2024. The F-35 program is also conducting sustainment and upgrade development, with early aircraft from LRIP lot 2 onwards gradually upgraded to the baseline Block 3F standard by 2021.

With Block 3F as the final build for SDD, the first major upgrade program is Block 4 which began development in 2019 and was initially captured under the Continuous Capability Development and Delivery (C2D2) program. Block 4 is expected to enter service in incremental steps from the late 2020s to early 2030s and integrates additional weapons, including those unique to international customers, improved sensor capabilities including the new AN/APG-85 AESA radar and additional ESM bandwidth, and adds Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver (ROVER) support. C2D2 also places greater emphasis on agile software development to enable quicker releases.

The key enabler of Block 4 is Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) avionics hardware, which consists of new display, core processor, and memory modules to support increased processing requirements, as well as engine upgrade that increases the amount of cooling available to support the additional mission systems. The engine upgrade effort explored both improvements to the F135 as well as significantly more power and efficient adaptive cycle engines. In 2018, General Electric and Pratt & Whitney were awarded contracts to develop adaptive cycle engines for potential application in the F-35, and in 2022, the F-35 Adaptive Engine Replacement program was launched to integrate them. However, in 2023 the USAF chose an improved F135 under the Engine Core Upgrade (ECU) program over an adaptive cycle engine due to cost as well as concerns over risk of integrating the new engine, initially designed for the F-35A, on the B and C. Difficulties with the new TR-3 hardware, including regression testing, have caused delays to Block 4 as well as a halt in aircraft deliveries from July 2023 to July 2024.

Defense contractors have offered upgrades to the F-35 outside of official program contracts. In 2013, Northrop Grumman disclosed its development of a directional infrared countermeasures suite, named Threat Nullification Defensive Resource (ThNDR). The countermeasure system would share the same space as the Distributed Aperture System (DAS) sensors and acts as a laser missile jammer to protect against infrared-homing missiles.

Israel operates a unique subvariant of the F-35A, designated the F-35I, that is designed to better interface with and incorporate Israeli equipment and weapons. The Israeli Air Force also has their own F-35I test aircraft that provides more access to the core avionics to include their own equipment.

Procurement and international participation

Main article: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement

The United States is the primary customer and financial backer, with planned procurement of 1,763 F-35As for the USAF, 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs for the USMC, and 273 F-35Cs for the USN. Additionally, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark and Canada have agreed to contribute US$4.375 billion towards development costs, with the United Kingdom contributing about 10% of the planned development costs as the sole Tier 1 partner. The initial plan was that the U.S. and eight major partner countries would acquire over 3,100 F-35s through 2035. The three tiers of international participation generally reflect financial stake in the program, the amount of technology transfer and subcontracts open for bid by national companies, and the order in which countries can obtain production aircraft. Alongside program partner countries, Israel and Singapore have joined as Security Cooperative Participants (SCP). Sales to SCP and non-partner states, including Belgium, Japan, and South Korea, are made through the Pentagon's Foreign Military Sales program. Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in July 2019 over security concerns following its purchase of a Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile system.

As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: $82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

Design

Overview

The F-35 is a family of single-engine, supersonic, stealth multirole strike fighters. The second fifth-generation fighter to enter US service and the first operational supersonic STOVL stealth fighter, the F-35 emphasizes low observables, advanced avionics and sensor fusion that enable a high level of situational awareness and long range lethality; the USAF considers the aircraft its primary strike fighter for conducting suppression of enemy air defense (SEAD) and air interdiction missions, owing to the advanced sensors and mission systems.

(From the top) F-35A of the 33rd FW, F-35B of VMFAT-501 and F-35C of VFA-101 near Eglin AFB, 2014
A vortex forms around the body of the aircraft.

The F-35 has a wing-tail configuration with two vertical stabilizers canted for stealth. Flight control surfaces include leading-edge flaps, flaperons, rudders, and all-moving horizontal tails (stabilators); leading edge root extensions or chines also run forwards to the inlets. The relatively short 35-foot wingspan of the F-35A and F-35B is set by the requirement to fit inside USN amphibious assault ship parking areas and elevators; the F-35C's larger wing is more fuel efficient. The fixed diverterless supersonic inlets (DSI) use a bumped compression surface and forward-swept cowl to shed the boundary layer of the forebody away from the inlets, which form a Y-duct for the engine. Structurally, the F-35 drew upon lessons from the F-22; composites comprise 35% of airframe weight, with the majority being bismaleimide and composite epoxy materials as well as some carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy in later production lots. The F-35 is considerably heavier than the lightweight fighters it replaces, with the lightest variant having an empty weight of 29,300 lb (13,300 kg); much of the weight can be attributed to the internal weapons bays and the extensive avionics carried.

While lacking the kinematic performance of the larger twin-engine F-22, the F-35 is competitive with fourth-generation fighters such as the F-16 and F/A-18, especially when they carry weapons because the F-35's internal weapons bay eliminates drag from external stores. All variants have a top speed of Mach 1.6, attainable with full internal payload. The Pratt & Whitney F135 engine gives good subsonic acceleration and energy, with supersonic dash in afterburner. The F-35, while not a "supercruising" aircraft, can fly at Mach 1.2 for a dash of 150 miles (240 km) with afterburners. This ability can be useful in battlefield situations. The large stabilitors, leading edge extensions and flaps, and canted rudders provide excellent high alpha (angle-of-attack) characteristics, with a trimmed alpha of 50°. Relaxed stability and triplex-redundant fly-by-wire controls provide excellent handling qualities and departure resistance. Having over double the F-16's internal fuel, the F-35 has a considerably greater combat radius, while stealth also enables a more efficient mission flight profile.

Sensors and avionics

The AN/AAQ-40 Electro-Optical Target System (EOTS) under the nose of an F-35A

The F-35's mission systems are among the most complex aspects of the aircraft. The avionics and sensor fusion are designed to improve the pilot's situational awareness and command-and-control capabilities and facilitate network-centric warfare. Key sensors include the Northrop Grumman AN/APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, BAE Systems AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare system, Northrop Grumman/Raytheon AN/AAQ-37 Electro-optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS), Lockheed Martin AN/AAQ-40 Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS) and Northrop Grumman AN/ASQ-242 Communications, Navigation, and Identification (CNI) suite. The F-35 was designed for its sensors to work together to provide a cohesive image of the local battlespace; for example, the APG-81 radar also acts as a part of the electronic warfare system.

Much of the F-35's software was developed in C and C++ programming languages, while Ada83 code from the F-22 was also used; the Block 3F software has 8.6 million lines of code. The Green Hills Software Integrity DO-178B real-time operating system (RTOS) runs on integrated core processors (ICPs); data networking includes the IEEE 1394b and Fibre Channel buses. The avionics use commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components when practical to make upgrades cheaper and more flexible; for example, to enable fleet software upgrades for the software-defined radio (SDR) systems. The mission systems software, particularly for sensor fusion, was one of the program's most difficult parts and responsible for substantial program delays.

AN/APG-81 AESA radar antenna

The APG-81 radar uses electronic scanning for rapid beam agility and incorporates passive and active air-to-air modes, strike modes, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) capability, with multiple target track-while-scan at ranges in excess of 80 nmi (150 km). The antenna is tilted backwards for stealth. Complementing the radar is the AAQ-37 DAS, which consists of six infrared sensors that provide all-aspect missile launch warning and target tracking; the DAS acts as a situational awareness infrared search-and-track (SAIRST) and gives the pilot spherical infrared and night-vision imagery on the helmet visor. The ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare system has ten radio frequency antennas embedded into the edges of the wing and tail for all-aspect radar warning receiver (RWR). It also provides sensor fusion of radio frequency and infrared tracking functions, geolocation threat targeting, and multispectral image countermeasures for self-defense against missiles. The electronic warfare system can detect and jam hostile radars. The AAQ-40 EOTS is mounted behind a faceted low-observable window under the nose and performs laser targeting, forward-looking infrared (FLIR), and long range IRST functions. The ASQ-242 CNI suite uses a half dozen physical links, including the directional Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL), for covert CNI functions. Through sensor fusion, information from radio frequency receivers and infrared sensors are combined to form a single tactical picture for the pilot. The all-aspect target direction and identification can be shared via MADL to other platforms without compromising low observability, while Link 16 enables communication with older systems.

The F-35 was designed to accept upgrades to its processors, sensors, and software over its lifespan. Technology Refresh 3, which includes a new core processor and a new cockpit display, is planned for Lot 15 aircraft. Lockheed Martin has offered the Advanced EOTS for the Block 4 configuration; the improved sensor fits into the same area as the baseline EOTS with minimal changes. In June 2018, Lockheed Martin picked Raytheon for improved DAS. The USAF has studied the potential for the F-35 to orchestrate attacks by unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) via its sensors and communications equipment.

A new radar called the AN/APG-85 is planned for Block 4 F-35s. According to the JPO, the new radar will be compatible with all three major F-35 variants. However, it is unclear if older aircraft will be retrofitted with the new radar.

Stealth and signatures

The sawtooth design on the landing gear door and access panels

Stealth is a key aspect of the F-35's design, and radar cross-section (RCS) is minimized through careful shaping of the airframe and the use of radar-absorbent materials (RAM); visible measures to reduce RCS include alignment of edges and continuous curvature of surfaces, serration of skin panels, and the masking of the engine face and turbine. Additionally, the F-35's diverterless supersonic inlet (DSI) uses a compression bump and forward-swept cowl rather than a splitter gap or bleed system to divert the boundary layer away from the inlet duct, eliminating the diverter cavity and further reducing radar signature. The RCS of the F-35 has been characterized as lower than a metal golf ball at certain frequencies and angles; in some conditions, the F-35 compares favorably to the F-22 in stealth. For maintainability, the F-35's stealth design took lessons from earlier stealth aircraft such as the F-22; the F-35's radar-absorbent fibermat skin is more durable and requires less maintenance than older topcoats. The aircraft also has reduced infrared and visual signatures as well as strict controls of radio frequency emitters to prevent their detection. The F-35's stealth design is primarily focused on high-frequency X-band wavelengths; low-frequency radars can spot stealthy aircraft due to Rayleigh scattering, but such radars are also conspicuous, susceptible to clutter, and lack precision. To disguise its RCS, the aircraft can mount four Luneburg lens reflectors.

Noise from the F-35 caused concerns in residential areas near potential bases for the aircraft, and residents near two such bases—Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, and Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Florida—requested environmental impact studies in 2008 and 2009 respectively. Although the noise levels, in decibels, were comparable to those of prior fighters such as the F-16, the F-35's sound power is stronger—particularly at lower frequencies. Subsequent surveys and studies have indicated that the noise of the F-35 was not perceptibly different from the F-16 and F/A-18E/F, though the greater low-frequency noise was noticeable for some observers.

Cockpit

F-35 cockpit simulator

The glass cockpit was designed to give the pilot good situational awareness. The main display is a 20-by-8-inch (50 by 20 cm) panoramic touchscreen, which shows flight instruments, stores management, CNI information, and integrated caution and warnings; the pilot can customize the arrangement of the information. Below the main display is a smaller stand-by display. The cockpit has a speech-recognition system developed by Adacel. The F-35 does not have a head-up display; instead, flight and combat information is displayed on the visor of the pilot's helmet in a helmet-mounted display system (HMDS). The one-piece tinted canopy is hinged at the front and has an internal frame for structural strength. The Martin-Baker US16E ejection seat is launched by a twin-catapult system housed on side rails. There is a right-hand side stick and throttle hands-on throttle-and-stick system. For life support, an onboard oxygen-generation system (OBOGS) is fitted and powered by the Integrated Power Package (IPP), with an auxiliary oxygen bottle and backup oxygen system for emergencies.

The F-35's helmet-mounted display system

The Vision Systems International helmet display is a key piece of the F-35's human-machine interface. Instead of the head-up display mounted atop the dashboard of earlier fighters, the HMDS puts flight and combat information on the helmet visor, allowing the pilot to see it no matter which way they are facing. Infrared and night vision imagery from the Distributed Aperture System can be displayed directly on the HMDS and enables the pilot to "see through" the aircraft. The HMDS allows an F-35 pilot to fire missiles at targets even when the nose of the aircraft is pointing elsewhere by cuing missile seekers at high angles off-boresight. Each helmet costs $400,000. The HMDS weighs more than traditional helmets, and there is concern that it can endanger lightweight pilots during ejection.

Due to the HMDS's vibration, jitter, night-vision and sensor display problems during development, Lockheed Martin and Elbit issued a draft specification in 2011 for an alternative HMDS based on the AN/AVS-9 night vision goggles as backup, with BAE Systems chosen later that year. A cockpit redesign would be needed to adopt an alternative HMDS. Following progress on the baseline helmet, development on the alternative HMDS was halted in October 2013. In 2016, the Gen 3 helmet with improved night vision camera, new liquid crystal displays, automated alignment and software enhancements was introduced with LRIP lot 7.

Armament

F-35A with all weapon bay doors open

To preserve its stealth shaping, the F-35 has two internal weapons bays each with two weapons stations. The two outboard weapon stations each can carry ordnance up to 2,500 lb (1,100 kg), or 1,500 lb (680 kg) for the F-35B, while the two inboard stations carry air-to-air missiles. Air-to-surface weapons for the outboard station include the Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), Paveway series of bombs, Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW), and cluster munitions (Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser). The station can also carry multiple smaller munitions such as the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs (SDB), GBU-53/B SDB II, and SPEAR 3; up to four SDBs can be carried per station for the F-35A and F-35C, and three for the F-35B. The F-35A achieved certification to carry the B61 Mod 12 nuclear bomb in October 2023. The inboard station can carry the AIM-120 AMRAAM and eventually the AIM-260 JATM. Two compartments behind the weapons bays contain flares, chaff, and towed decoys.

An F-35A from the 4th Fighter Squadron, 388th Fighter Wing, Hill AFB, Utah, flies a strafing run at the Utah Test & Training Range in August 2018. This was the first operation use of the GAU-22/A of the F-35A aircraft.

The aircraft can use six external weapons stations for missions that do not require stealth. The wingtip pylons each can carry an AIM-9X or AIM-132 ASRAAM and are canted outwards to reduce their radar cross-section. Additionally, each wing has a 5,000 lb (2,300 kg) inboard station and a 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) middle station, or 1,500 lb (680 kg) for F-35B. The external wing stations can carry large air-to-surface weapons that would not fit inside the weapons bays such as the AGM-158 Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) or AGM-158C LRASM cruise missile. An air-to-air missile load of eight AIM-120s and two AIM-9s is possible using internal and external weapons stations; a configuration of six 2,000 lb (910 kg) bombs, two AIM-120s and two AIM-9s can also be arranged. The F-35 is armed with a 25 mm GAU-22/A rotary cannon, a lighter four-barrel variant of the GAU-12/U Equalizer. On the F-35A this is mounted internally near the left wing root with 182 rounds carried; the gun is more effective against ground targets than the 20 mm gun carried by other USAF fighters. In 2020, a USAF report noted "unacceptable" accuracy problems with the GAU-22/A on the F-35A. These were due to "misalignments" in the gun's mount, which was also susceptible to cracking. These problems were resolved by 2024. The F-35B and F-35C have no internal gun and instead can use a Terma A/S multi-mission pod (MMP) carrying the GAU-22/A and 220 rounds; the pod is mounted on the centerline of the aircraft and shaped to reduce its radar cross-section. In lieu of the gun, the pod can also be used for different equipment and purposes, such as electronic warfare, aerial reconnaissance, or rear-facing tactical radar. The pod was not susceptible to the accuracy issues that once plagued the gun on the F-35A variant, though was apparently not problem-free.

Lockheed Martin is developing a weapon rack called Sidekick that would enable the internal outboard station to carry two AIM-120s, thus increasing the internal air-to-air payload to six missiles, currently offered for Block 4. Block 4 will also have a rearranged hydraulic line and bracket to allow the F-35B to carry four SDBs per internal outboard station; integration of the MBDA Meteor is also planned. The USAF and USN are planning to integrate the AGM-88G AARGM-ER internally in the F-35A and F-35C. Norway and Australia are funding an adaptation of the Naval Strike Missile (NSM) for the F-35; designated Joint Strike Missile (JSM), two missiles can be carried internally with an additional four externally. Both hypersonic missiles and direct energy weapons such as solid-state laser are currently being considered as future upgrades; in 2024, Lockheed Martin disclosed its proposed Mako hypersonic missile, which can be carried internally in the F-35A and C and externally on the B. Additionally, Lockheed Martin is studying integrating a fiber laser that uses spectral beam combining multiple individual laser modules into a single high-power beam, which can be scaled to various levels.

F-35A weapon bays with two B61 nuclear bombs and 2 AIM-120 AMRAAM

The USAF plans for the F-35A to take up the close air support (CAS) mission in contested environments; amid criticism that it is not as well suited as a dedicated attack platform, USAF chief of staff Mark Welsh placed a focus on weapons for CAS sorties, including guided rockets, fragmentation rockets that shatter into individual projectiles before impact, and more compact ammunition for higher capacity gun pods. Fragmentary rocket warheads create greater effects than cannon shells as each rocket creates a "thousand-round burst", delivering more projectiles than a strafing run.

Engine

The aircraft is powered by a single Pratt & Whitney F135 low-bypass augmented turbofan with rated thrust of 28,000 lbf (125 kN) at military power and 43,000 lbf (191 kN) with afterburner. Derived from the Pratt & Whitney F119 used by the F-22, the F135 has a larger fan and higher bypass ratio to increase subsonic thrust and fuel efficiency, and unlike the F119, is not optimized for supercruise. The engine contributes to the F-35's stealth by having a low-observable augmenter, or afterburner, that incorporates fuel injectors into thick curved vanes; these vanes are covered by ceramic radar-absorbent materials and mask the turbine. The stealthy augmenter had problems with pressure pulsations, or "screech", at low altitude and high speed early in its development. The low-observable axisymmetric nozzle consists of 15 partially overlapping flaps that create a sawtooth pattern at the trailing edge, which reduces radar signature and creates shed vortices that reduce the infrared signature of the exhaust plume. Due to the engine's large dimensions, the U.S. Navy had to modify its underway replenishment system to facilitate at-sea logistics support. The F-35's Integrated Power Package (IPP) performs power and thermal management and integrates environment control, auxiliary power unit, engine starting, and other functions into a single system.

Illustration of the STOVL swivel nozzle, lift fan, and roll-control posts

The F135-PW-600 variant for the F-35B incorporates the Shaft-Driven Lift Fan (SDLF) to allow STOVL operations. Designed by Lockheed Martin and developed by Rolls-Royce, the SDLF, also known as the Rolls-Royce LiftSystem, consists of the lift fan, drive shaft, two roll posts, and a "three-bearing swivel module" (3BSM). The nozzle features three bearings resembling a short cylinder with nonparallel bases. As the toothed edges are rotated by motors, the nozzle swivels from being linear with the engine to being perpendicular. The thrust vectoring 3BSM nozzle allows the main engine exhaust to be deflected downward at the tail of the aircraft and is moved by a "fueldraulic" actuator that uses pressurized fuel as the working fluid. Unlike the Harrier's Pegasus engine that entirely uses direct engine thrust for lift, the F-35B's system augments the swivel nozzle's thrust with the lift fan; the fan is powered by the low-pressure turbine through a drive shaft when engaged with a clutch and placed near the front of the aircraft to provide a torque countering that of the 3BSM nozzle. Roll control during slow flight is achieved by diverting unheated engine bypass air through wing-mounted thrust nozzles called roll posts.

An alternative engine, the General Electric/Allison/Rolls-Royce F136, was being developed in the 1990s and 2000s; originally, F-35 engines from Lot 6 onward were competitively tendered. Using technology from the General Electric YF120, the F136 was claimed to have a greater temperature margin than the F135 due to the higher mass flow design making full use of the inlet. The F136 was canceled in December 2011 due to lack of funding.

The F-35 is expected to receive propulsion upgrades over its lifecycle to adapt to emerging threats and enable additional capabilities. In 2016, the Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) was launched to develop and test adaptive cycle engines, with one major potential application being the re-engining of the F-35; in 2018, both GE and P&W were awarded contracts to develop 45,000 lbf (200 kN) thrust class demonstrators, with the designations XA100 and XA101 respectively. In addition to potential re-engining, P&W is also developing improvements to the baseline F135; the Engine Core Upgrade (ECU) is an update to the power module, originally called Growth Option 1.0 and then Engine Enhancement Package, that improves engine thrust and fuel burn by 5% and bleed air cooling capacity by 50% to support Block 4. The F135 ECU was selected over AETP engines in 2023 to provide additional power and cooling for the F-35. Although GE had expected that the more revolutionary XA100 could enter service with the F-35A and C by 2027 and could be adapted for the F-35B, the increased cost and risk caused the USAF to choose the F135 ECU instead.

Maintenance and logistics

The F-35 is designed to require less maintenance than prior stealth aircraft. Some 95% of all field-replaceable parts are "one deep"—that is, nothing else needs to be removed to reach the desired part; for instance, the ejection seat can be replaced without removing the canopy. The F-35 has a fibermat radar-absorbent material (RAM) baked into the skin, which is more durable, easier to work with, and faster to cure than older RAM coatings; similar coatings are being considered for application on older stealth aircraft such as the F-22. Skin corrosion on the F-22 led to the F-35 using a less galvanic corrosion-inducing skin gap filler, fewer gaps in the airframe skin needing filler, and better drainage. The flight control system uses electro-hydrostatic actuators rather than traditional hydraulic systems; these controls can be powered by lithium-ion batteries in case of emergency. Commonality between variants led to the USMC's first aircraft maintenance Field Training Detachment, which applied USAF lessons to their F-35 operations.

The F-35 was initially supported by a computerized maintenance management system named Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS). In concept, any F-35 can be serviced at any maintenance facility and all parts can be globally tracked and shared as needed. Due to numerous problems, such as unreliable diagnoses, excessive connectivity requirements, and security vulnerabilities, ALIS is being replaced by the cloud-based Operational Data Integrated Network (ODIN). From September 2020, ODIN base kits (OBKs) were running ALIS software, as well as ODIN software, first at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Yuma, Arizona, then at Naval Air Station Lemoore, California, in support of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 125 on 16 July 2021, and then Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, in support of the 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron (TES) on 6 August 2021. In 2022, over a dozen more OBK sites will replace the ALIS's Standard Operating Unit unclassified (SOU-U) servers. OBK performance is double that of ALIS.

Operational history

Testing

The first F-35A, AA-1, conducted its engine run in September 2006 and first flew on 15 December 2006. Unlike all subsequent aircraft, AA-1 did not have the weight optimization from SWAT; consequently, it mainly tested subsystems common to subsequent aircraft, such as the propulsion, electrical system, and cockpit displays. This aircraft was retired from flight testing in December 2009 and was used for live-fire testing at NAS China Lake.

The first delivered USAF F-35A on its delivery flight to Eglin AFB, July 2011

The first F-35B, BF-1, flew on 11 June 2008, while the first weight-optimized F-35A and F-35C, AF-1 and CF-1, flew on 14 November 2009 and 6 June 2010 respectively. The F-35B's first hover was on 17 March 2010, followed by its first vertical landing the next day. The F-35 Integrated Test Force (ITF) consisted of 18 aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base and Naval Air Station Patuxent River. Nine aircraft at Edwards, five F-35As, three F-35Bs, and one F-35C, performed flight sciences testing such as F-35A envelope expansion, flight loads, stores separation, as well as mission systems testing. The other nine aircraft at Patuxent River, five F-35Bs and four F-35Cs, were responsible for F-35B and C envelope expansion and STOVL and CV suitability testing. Additional carrier suitability testing was conducted at Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division at Lakehurst, New Jersey. Two non-flying aircraft of each variant were used to test static loads and fatigue. For testing avionics and mission systems, a modified Boeing 737-300 with a duplication of the cockpit, the Lockheed Martin CATBird has been used. Field testing of the F-35's sensors were conducted during Exercise Northern Edge 2009 and 2011, serving as significant risk-reduction steps.

Flight tests revealed several serious deficiencies that required costly redesigns, caused delays, and resulted in several fleet-wide groundings. In 2011, the F-35C failed to catch the arresting wire in all eight landing tests; a redesigned tail hook was delivered two years later. By June 2009, many of the initial flight test targets had been accomplished but the program was behind schedule. Software and mission systems were among the biggest sources of delays for the program, with sensor fusion proving especially challenging. In fatigue testing, the F-35B suffered several premature cracks, requiring a redesign of the structure. A third non-flying F-35B is currently planned to test the redesigned structure. The F-35B and C also had problems with the horizontal tails suffering heat damage from prolonged afterburner use. Early flight control laws had problems with "wing drop" and also made the airplane sluggish, with high angles-of-attack tests in 2015 against an F-16 showing a lack of energy.

U.S. Marine Corps F-35B lands on JS Izumo.

At-sea testing of the F-35B was first conducted aboard USS Wasp. In October 2011, two F-35Bs conducted three weeks of initial sea trials, called Development Test I. The second F-35B sea trials, Development Test II, began in August 2013, with tests including nighttime operations; two aircraft completed 19 nighttime vertical landings using DAS imagery. The first operational testing involving six F-35Bs was done on the Wasp in May 2015. The final Development Test III on USS America involving operations in high sea states was completed in late 2016. A Royal Navy F-35 conducted the first "rolling" landing on board HMS Queen Elizabeth in October 2018.

USN F-35C makes the aircraft's first arrested landing aboard the carrier USS Nimitz off the coast of San Diego

After the redesigned tail hook arrived, the F-35C's carrier-based Development Test I began in November 2014 aboard USS Nimitz and focused on basic day carrier operations and establishing launch and recovery handling procedures. Development Test II, which focused on night operations, weapons loading, and full power launches, took place in October 2015. The final Development Test III was completed in August 2016, and included tests of asymmetric loads and certifying systems for landing qualifications and interoperability. Operational test of the F-35C was conducted in 2018 and the first operational squadron achieved safe-for-flight milestone that December, paving the way for its introduction in 2019.

The F-35's reliability and availability have fallen short of requirements, especially in the early years of testing. The ALIS maintenance and logistics system was plagued by excessive connectivity requirements and faulty diagnoses. In late 2017, the GAO reported the time needed to repair an F-35 part averaged 172 days, which was "twice the program's objective," and that shortage of spare parts was degrading readiness. In 2019, while individual F-35 units have achieved mission-capable rates of over the target of 80% for short periods during deployed operations, fleet-wide rates remained below target. The fleet availability goal of 65% was also not met, although the trend shows improvement. Internal gun accuracy of the F-35A was unacceptable until misalignment issues were addressed by 2024. As of 2020, the number of the program's most serious issues have been decreased by half.

Operational test and evaluation (OT&E) with Block 3F, the final configuration for SDD, began in December 2018, but its completion was delayed particularly by technical problems in integration with the DOD's Joint Simulation Environment (JSE); the F-35 finally completed all JSE trials in September 2023.

United States

Training

The first F-35C Lightning II sortie takes off from VFA-101 at Eglin Air Force Base.

The F-35A and F-35B were cleared for basic flight training in early 2012, although there were concerns over safety and performance due to lack of system maturity at the time. During the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) phase, the three U.S. military services jointly developed tactics and procedures using flight simulators, testing effectiveness, discovering problems and refining design. On 10 September 2012, the USAF began an operational utility evaluation (OUE) of the F-35A, including logistical support, maintenance, personnel training, and pilot execution.

A pair of F-35Cs and F/A-18E/Fs fly over NAS Fallon, home of TOPGUN, in September 2015.

The USMC F-35B Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) was initially based at Eglin AFB in 2012 alongside USAF F-35A training units, before moving to MCAS Beaufort in 2014 while another FRS was stood up at MCAS Miramar in 2020. The USAF F-35A basic course is held at Eglin AFB and Luke AFB; in January 2013, training began at Eglin with capacity for 100 pilots and 2,100 maintainers at once. Additionally, the 6th Weapons Squadron of the USAF Weapons School was activated at Nellis AFB in June 2017 for F-35A weapons instructor curriculum while the 65th Aggressor Squadron was reactivated with the F-35A in June 2022 to expand training against adversary stealth aircraft tactics. The USN stood up its F-35C FRS in 2012 with VFA-101 at Eglin AFB, but operations would later be transferred and consolidated under VFA-125 at NAS Lemoore in 2019. The F-35C was introduced to the Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor course, or TOPGUN, in 2020 and the additional capabilities of the aircraft greatly revamped the course syllabus.

U.S. Marine Corps

On 16 November 2012, the USMC received the first F-35B of VMFA-121 at MCAS Yuma. The USMC declared Initial Operational Capability (IOC) for the F-35B in the Block 2B configuration on 31 July 2015 after operational trials, with some limitations in night operations, mission systems, and weapons carriage. USMC F-35Bs participated in their first Red Flag exercise in July 2016 with 67 sorties conducted. The first F-35B deployment occurred in 2017 at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan; combat employment began in July 2018 from the amphibious assault ship USS Essex, with the first combat strike on 27 September 2018 against a Taliban target in Afghanistan.

In addition to deploying F-35Bs on amphibious assault ships, the USMC plans to disperse the aircraft among austere forward-deployed bases with shelter and concealment to enhance survivability while remaining close to a battlespace. Known as distributed STOVL operations (DSO), F-35Bs would operate from temporary bases in allied territory within hostile missile engagement zones and displace inside the enemy's 24- to 48-hour targeting cycle; this strategy allows F-35Bs to rapidly respond to operational needs, with mobile forward arming and refueling points (M-FARPs) accommodating KC-130 and MV-22 Osprey aircraft to rearm and refuel the jets, as well as littoral areas for sea links of mobile distribution sites. For higher echelons of maintenance, F-35Bs would return from M-FARPs to rear-area friendly bases or ships. Helicopter-portable metal planking is needed to protect unprepared roads from the F-35B's exhaust; the USMC are studying lighter heat-resistant options. These operations have become part of the larger USMC Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO) concept.

The first USMC F-35C squadron, VMFA-314, achieved Full Operational Capability in July 2021 and was first deployed on board USS Abraham Lincoln as a part of Carrier Air Wing 9 in January 2022.

In 2024, Lt. Gen. Sami Sadat of Afghanistan described an operation using F-35Bs from USS Essex which bombed a Taliban position through cloud cover. "The impact left on my soldiers was amazing. Like, whoa, you know, we have this technology," Sadat said. "But also the impact on the Taliban was quite crippling, because they have never seen Afghan forces move in the winter, and they have never seen planes that could bomb through the clouds."

On 9 November 2024 Marine F-35Cs carried out strikes on the Houthi movement in Yemen in the context of the Red Sea crisis.

U.S. Air Force

USAF F-35A in the Block 3i configuration achieved IOC with the USAF's 34th Fighter Squadron at Hill Air Force Base, Utah on 2 August 2016. F-35As conducted their first Red Flag exercise in 2017; system maturity had improved and the aircraft scored a kill ratio of 15:1 against an F-16 aggressor squadron in a high-threat environment. The first USAF F-35A deployment occurred on 15 April 2019 to Al Dhafra Air Base, UAE. On 27 April 2019, USAF F-35As were first used in combat in an airstrike on an Islamic State tunnel network in northern Iraq.

For European basing, RAF Lakenheath in the UK was chosen as the first installation to station two F-35A squadrons, with 48 aircraft adding to the 48th Fighter Wing's existing F-15C and F-15E squadrons. The first aircraft of the 495th Fighter Squadron arrived on 15 December 2021.

The F-35's operating cost is higher than some older USAF tactical aircraft. In fiscal year 2018, the F-35A's cost per flight hour (CPFH) was $44,000, a number that was reduced to $35,000 in 2019. For comparison, in 2015 the CPFH of the A-10 was $17,716; the F-15C, $41,921; and the F-16C, $22,514. Lockheed Martin hopes to reduce it to $25,000 by 2025 through performance-based logistics and other measures.

VFA-147 F-35C catches the wire on USS George Washington.

U.S. Navy

The USN achieved operational status with the F-35C in Block 3F on 28 February 2019. On 2 August 2021, the F-35C of VFA-147, as well as the CMV-22 Osprey, embarked on their maiden deployments as part of Carrier Air Wing 2 on board USS Carl Vinson.

United Kingdom

F-35B ZM148 of No. 617 Squadron landing on HMS Queen Elizabeth, 2019

The United Kingdom's Royal Air Force and Royal Navy operate the F-35B. Called Lightning in British service, it has replaced the Harrier GR9, retired in 2010, and Tornado GR4, retired in 2019. The F-35 is to be Britain's primary strike aircraft for the next three decades. One of the Royal Navy's requirements was a Shipborne Rolling and Vertical Landing (SRVL) mode to increase maximum landing weight by using wing lift during landing. Like the Italian Navy, British F-35Bs use ski-jumps to fly from their aircraft carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales. British F-35Bs are not intended to use the Brimstone 2 missile. In July 2013, Chief of the Air Staff Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Dalton announced that No. 617 (The Dambusters) Squadron would be the RAF's first operational F-35 squadron.

The first British F-35 squadron was No. 17 (Reserve) Test and Evaluation Squadron (TES), which stood up on 12 April 2013 as the plane's Operational Evaluation Unit. By June 2013, the RAF had received three F-35s of the 48 on order, initially based at Eglin Air Force Base. In June 2015, the F-35B undertook its first launch from a ski-jump at NAS Patuxent River. On 5 July 2017, it was announced the second UK-based RAF squadron would be No. 207 Squadron, which reformed on 1 August 2019 as the Lightning Operational Conversion Unit. No. 617 Squadron reformed on 18 April 2018 during a ceremony in Washington, D.C., becoming the first RAF front-line squadron to operate the type; receiving its first four F-35Bs on 6 June, flying from MCAS Beaufort to RAF Marham. On 10 January 2019, No. 617 Squadron and its F-35s were declared combat-ready.

April 2019 saw the first overseas deployment of a UK F-35 squadron when No. 617 Squadron went to RAF Akrotiri, Cyprus. This reportedly led on 25 June 2019 to the first combat use of an RAF F-35B: an armed reconnaissance flight searching for Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. In October 2019, the Dambusters and No. 17 TES F-35s were embarked on HMS Queen Elizabeth for the first time. No. 617 Squadron departed RAF Marham on 22 January 2020 for their first Exercise Red Flag with the Lightning. As of November 2022, 26 F-35Bs were based in the United Kingdom (with 617 and 207 Squadrons) and a further three were permanently based in the United States (with 17 Squadron) for testing and evaluation purposes.

The UK's second operational squadron is the Fleet Air Arm's 809 Naval Air Squadron, which stood up in December 2023.

Australia

Four F-35As assigned to No. 3 Squadron RAAF in 2023

Australia's first F-35, designated A35-001, was manufactured in 2014, with flight training provided through international Pilot Training Centre (PTC) at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona. The first two F-35s were unveiled to the Australian public on 3 March 2017 at the Avalon Airshow. By 2021, the Royal Australian Air Force had accepted 26 F-35As, with nine in the US and 17 operating at No 3 Squadron and No 2 Operational Conversion Unit at RAAF Base Williamtown. With 41 trained RAAF pilots and 225 trained technicians for maintenance, the fleet was declared ready to deploy on operations. It was originally expected that Australia would receive all 72 F-35s by 2023. Its final nine aircraft, which were the TR-3 version, arrived in Australia in December 2024.

Israel

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) declared the F-35 operationally capable on 6 December 2017. According to Kuwaiti newspaper Al Jarida, in July 2018, a test mission of at least three IAF F-35s flew to Iran's capital Tehran and back to Tel Aviv. While publicly unconfirmed, regional leaders acted on the report; Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei reportedly fired the air force chief and commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps over the mission.

On 22 May 2018, IAF chief Amikam Norkin said that the service had employed their F-35Is in two attacks on two battle fronts, marking the first combat operation of an F-35 by any country. Norkin said it had been flown "all over the Middle East", and showed photos of an F-35I flying over Beirut in daylight. In July 2019, Israel expanded its strikes against Iranian missile shipments; IAF F-35Is allegedly struck Iranian targets in Iraq twice.

In November 2020, the IAF announced the delivery of a unique F-35I testbed aircraft among a delivery of four aircraft received in August, to be used to test and integrate Israeli-produced weapons and electronic systems on F-35s received later. This is the only example of a testbed F-35 delivered to a non-US air force.

On 11 May 2021, eight IAF F-35Is took part in an attack on 150 targets in Hamas' rocket array, including 50–70 launch pits in the northern Gaza Strip, as part of Operation Guardian of the Walls.

On 6 March 2022, the IDF stated that on 15 March 2021, F-35Is shot down two Iranian drones carrying weapons to the Gaza Strip. This was the first operational shoot down and interception carried out by the F-35. They were also used in the Israel–Hamas war.

On 2 November 2023, the IDF posted on social media that they used an F-35I to shoot down a Houthi cruise missile over the Red Sea that was fired from Yemen during the Israel-Hamas War.

The F-35I Adir was used in the 29 September 2024 Israeli attacks on Yemen. F-35Is were also reportedly involved in the October 2024 Israeli strikes on Iran.

Italy

Italy's F-35As were declared to have reached initial operational capability (IOC) on 30 November 2018. At the time Italy had taken delivery of 10 F-35As and one F-35B, with 2 F-35As and the one F-35B being stationed in the U.S. for training, the remaining 8 F-35As were stationed in Amendola.

Japan

F-35A in afterburner at JASDF Misawa Air Base

Japan's F-35As were declared to have reached initial operational capability (IOC) on 29 March 2019. At the time Japan had taken delivery of 10 F-35As stationed in Misawa Air Base. Japan plans to eventually acquire a total of 147 F-35s, which will include 42 F-35Bs. It plans to use the latter variant to equip Japan's Izumo-class multi-purpose destroyers.

Norway

First Norwegian F-35A Lightning II at Luke Air Force Base

On 6 November 2019 Norway declared initial operational capability (IOC) for its fleet of 15 F-35As out of a planned 52 F-35As. On 6 January 2022 Norway's F-35As replaced its F-16s for the NATO quick reaction alert mission in the high north.

On 22 September 2023, two F-35As from the Royal Norwegian Air Force landed on a motorway near Tervo, Finland, showing, for the first time, that F-35As can operate from paved roads. Unlike the F-35B they cannot land vertically. The fighters were also refueled with their engines running. Commander of the Royal Norwegian Air Force, Major General Rolf Folland, said: "Fighter jets are vulnerable on the ground, so by being able to use small airfields – and now motorways – (this) increases our survivability in war,"

Netherlands

On 27 December 2021 the Netherlands declared initial operational capability (IOC) for its fleet of 24 F-35As that it has received to date from its order for 46 F-35As. In 2022, the Netherlands announced they will order an additional six F-35s, totaling 52 aircraft ordered.

Variants

F-35 configurationsF-35AF-35 variants in flight

The F-35 was designed with three initial variants – the F-35A, a CTOL land-based version; the F-35B, a STOVL version capable of use either on land or on aircraft carriers; and the F-35C, a CATOBAR carrier-based version. Since then, there has been work on the design of nationally specific versions for Israel and Canada.

F-35A

The F-35A is the conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) variant intended for the USAF and other air forces. It is the smallest, lightest version and capable of 9 g, the highest of all variants.

Although the F-35A currently conducts aerial refueling via boom and receptacle method, the aircraft can be modified for probe-and-drogue refueling if needed by the customer. A drag chute pod can be installed on the F-35A, with the Royal Norwegian Air Force being the first operator to adopt it.

F-35B

See also: Joint Combat Aircraft
F-35B cutaway with lift fan
F-35B conducting a vertical landing (note the rotated nozzle and the lift fan vent duct)

The F-35B is the short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the aircraft. Similar in size to the A variant, the B sacrifices about a third of the A variant's fuel volume to accommodate the shaft-driven lift fan (SDLF). This variant is limited to 7 g. Unlike other variants, the F-35B has no landing hook. The "STOVL/HOOK" control instead engages conversion between normal and vertical flight. The F-35B is capable of Mach 1.6 (1,976 km/h) and can perform vertical and/or short take-off and landing (V/STOL).

F-35C

The F-35C is a carrier-based variant designed for catapult-assisted take-off, barrier arrested recovery operations from aircraft carriers. Compared to the F-35A, the F-35C features larger wings with foldable wingtip sections, larger control surfaces for improved low-speed control, stronger landing gear for the stresses of carrier arrested landings, a twin-wheel nose gear, and a stronger tailhook for use with carrier arrestor cables. The larger wing area allows for decreased landing speed while increasing both range and payload. The F-35C is limited to 7.5 g.

F-35I "Adir"

Main article: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Israeli procurement

The F-35I Adir (Hebrew: אדיר, meaning "Awesome", or "Mighty") is an F-35A with unique Israeli modifications. The US initially refused to allow such changes before permitting Israel to integrate its own electronic warfare systems, including sensors and countermeasures. The main computer has a plug-and-play function for add-on systems; proposals include an external jamming pod, and new Israeli air-to-air missiles and guided bombs in the internal weapon bays. A senior IAF official said that the F-35's stealth may be partly overcome within 10 years despite a 30 to 40-year service life, thus Israel's insistence on using their own electronic warfare systems. In 2010, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) considered a two-seat F-35 concept; an IAI executive noted that there was a "known demand for two seats not only from Israel but from other air forces". In 2008, IAI planned to produce conformal fuel tanks.

Israel had ordered a total of 75 F-35Is by 2023, with 36 already delivered as of November 2022.

Proposed variants

CF-35

Main article: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement

The Canadian CF-35 was a proposed variant that would differ from the F-35A through the addition of a drogue parachute and the potential inclusion of an F-35B/C-style refueling probe. In 2012, it was revealed that the CF-35 would employ the same boom refueling system as the F-35A. One alternative proposal would have been the adoption of the F-35C for its probe refueling and lower landing speed; however, the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report cited the F-35C's limited performance and payload as being too high a price to pay. Following the 2015 Federal Election the Liberal Party, whose campaign had included a pledge to cancel the F-35 procurement, formed a new government and commenced an open competition to replace the existing CF-18 Hornet. The CF-35 variant was deemed too expensive to develop, and was never considered. The Canadian government decided to not pursue any other modifications in the Future Fighter Capability Project, and instead focused on the potential procurement of the existing F-35A variant.

On 28 March 2022, the Canadian Government began negotiations with Lockheed Martin for 88 F-35As to replace the aging fleet of CF-18 fighters starting in 2025. The aircraft are reported to cost up to CA$19bn total with a life-cycle cost estimated at CA$77bn over the course of the F-35 program. On 9 January 2023, Canada formally confirmed the purchase of 88 aircraft. The initial delivery to the Royal Canadian Air Force in 2026 will be 4 aircraft, followed by 6 aircraft each in 2027–2028, and the rest to be delivered by 2032. The additional characteristics confirmed for the CF-35 included the drag chute pod for landings at short/icy arctic runways, as well as the 'sidekick' system, which allows the CF-35 to carry up to 6 x AIM-120D missiles internally (instead of the typical internal capacity of 4 x AIM-120 missiles on other variants).

New export variant

In December 2021, it was reported that Lockheed Martin was developing a new variant for an unspecified foreign customer. The Department of Defense released US$49 million in funding for this work.

Operators

Main articles: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II operators and Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement
One of the RAAF's first two F-35As in December 2014
A Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-35A in flight
Republic of Korea Air Force F-35A
An F-35A Lightning II of the Royal Norwegian Air Force conducts a test flight over Fort Worth in October 2015.
First four RAF F-35Bs on a delivery flight to RAF Marham, June 2018
USN F-35C performs a touch-and-go landing aboard USS Abraham Lincoln.
 Australia
 Belgium
  • Belgian Air Component – 1 officially delivered (but none have left the US as of March 2024), 34 F-35A planned as of 2019.
 Denmark
 Israel
  • Israeli Air Force – 39 delivered as of July 2023 (F-35I "Adir"). Includes one F-35 testbed aircraft for indigenous Israeli weapons, electronics and structural upgrades, designated (AS-15). A total of 75 ordered.
 Italy
  • Italian Air Force – 17 F-35As and 3 F-35B delivered as of April 2023 of 75 F-35As and 20 F-35Bs ordered for the Italian Air Force.
  • Italian Navy – 3 delivered as of April 2023, out of 20 F-35Bs ordered for the Italian Navy.
 Japan
 Netherlands
  • Royal Netherlands Air Force – 39 F-35As delivered and operational, of which 8 trainer aircraft based at Luke Air Force Base in the USA. 52 F-35As ordered in total. The RNLAF is the second air force with a 5th gen-only fighter fleet after the retirement of its F-16s.
 Norway
  • Royal Norwegian Air Force – 40 F-35As delivered and operational, of which 21 are in Norway and 10 are based in the US for training as of 11 August 2021 of 52 F-35As planned in total. They differ from other F-35A through the addition of a drogue parachute.
 South Korea
 United Kingdom
  • Royal Air Force and Royal Navy (owned by the RAF but jointly operated) – 34 F-35Bs received with 30 in the UK after the loss of one aircraft in November 2021; the other three are in the US where they are used for testing and training. 42 (24 FOC fighters and 18 training aircraft) originally intended to be fast-tracked by 2023; A total of 48 ordered as of 2021; a total of 138 were originally planned, the expectation in 2021 was to eventually reach around 60 or 80. In 2022, it was announced that the UK would acquire 74 F-35Bs, with a decision on whether or not to go beyond that number, including the possibility of reviving the original plan of 138 aircraft, to be made in the mid-2020s. In February 2024 the United Kingdom appeared to signal a reaffirmation of its commitment to procure 138 F-35B aircraft, as per the original plan.
 United States

Future operators

 Canada
Further information: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement
  • Royal Canadian Air Force - 88 F-35As (Block 4) ordered on 9 January 2023. The first 4 are expected to be delivered in 2026, 6 in 2027, another 6 in 2028, and the rest delivered by 2032. This will phase out the CF-18s that were delivered in the 1980s.
 Czech Republic
  • Czech Air Force – The U.S. State Department approved a possible sale to the Czech Republic of F-35 aircraft, munitions and related equipment worth up to $5.62 billion, according to a 29 June 2023 announcement. On 29 January 2024, the Czech government signed a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. for the purchase of 24 F-35A fighters. In September 2024, the Czech Republic signed a contract for the logistic support of the F-35A.
 Finland
 Germany
  • German Air Force – 35 F-35A ordered as of 2023, with an order for 10 more being considered as of 2024.
 Greece
  • Hellenic Air Force – 20 F-35As on order, with expected delivery in late 2027 to early 2028. An option for another additional 20 aircraft is also included.
 Poland
  • Polish Air Force – 32 F-35A “Husarz” Block 4 jets with "Technology Refresh 3" software update and drogue parachutes were ordered on 31 January 2020. The deliveries are expected to begin in 2024 and conclude in 2030. There are plans for two more squadrons consisting of 16 jets each, for a total of 32 additional F-35s.
 Romania
  • Romanian Air Force – Romania signed the contract for 32 F-35A worth $6.5 billion on 21 November 2024. The plan is to buy 48 F-35A aircraft in two phases – first phase of 32 and second phase of 16. The first F-35s will arrive after 2030 and will replace the current Romanian F-16 fleet between 2034 and 2040.
 Singapore
  • Republic of Singapore Air Force – 12 F-35Bs on order as of February 2024 with first 4 to be delivered in 2026; The other 8 are to be delivered in 2028. 8 F-35As have been ordered, and are expected to arrive by 2030.
 Switzerland

Order and approval cancellations

 Republic of China
  • Republic of China Air Force – Taiwan has requested to buy the F-35 from the US. However this has been rejected by the US in fear of a critical response from China. In March 2009 Taiwan again was looking to buy U.S. fifth-generation fighter jets. However, in September 2011, during a visit to the US, the Deputy Minister of National Defense of Taiwan confirmed that while the country was busy upgrading its current F-16s it was still also looking to procure a next-generation aircraft such as the F-35. This received the usual critical response from China. Taiwan renewed its push for an F-35 purchase during Donald Trump's presidency in early 2017, again causing criticism from China. In March 2018, Taiwan once again reiterated its interest in the F-35 in light of an anticipated round of arms procurement from the United States. The F-35B STOVL variant is reportedly the political favorite as it would allow the Republic of China Air Force to continue operations after its limited number of runways were to be bombed in an escalation with the People's Republic of China. In April 2018 however it became clear that the U.S. government was reluctant about selling the F-35 to Taiwan over worries of Chinese spies within the Taiwanese Armed Forces, possibly compromising classified data concerning the aircraft and granting Chinese military officials access. In November 2018, it was reported that Taiwanese military leadership had abandoned the procurement of the F-35 in favor of a larger number of F-16V Viper aircraft. The decision was reportedly motivated by concerns about industry independence, as well as cost and previously raised espionage concerns.
 Thailand
 Turkey
  • Turkish Air Force – 30 were ordered, of up to 100 total planned. Future purchases have been banned by the U.S. with contracts canceled by early 2020, following Turkey's decision to buy the S-400 missile system from Russia. Six of Turkey's 30 ordered F-35As were completed as of 2019 (they are still kept in a hangar in the United States as of 2023 and so far haven't been transferred to the USAF, despite a modification in the 2020 Fiscal Year defense budget by the U.S. Congress which gives authority to do so if necessary), and two more were at the assembly line in 2020. The first four F-35As were delivered to Luke Air Force Base in 2018 and 2019 for the training of Turkish pilots. On 20 July 2020, the U.S. government had formally approved the seizure of eight F-35As originally bound for Turkey and their transfer to the USAF, together with a contract to modify them to USAF specifications. The U.S. has not refunded the $1.4 billion payment made by Turkey for purchasing the F-35A fighters as of January 2023. On 1 February 2024, the United States expressed willingness to readmit Turkey into the F-35 program if Turkey agrees to give up its S-400 system.
 United Arab Emirates
  • United Arab Emirates Air Force – Up to 50 F-35As planned. But on 27 January 2021, the Biden administration temporarily suspended the F-35 sales to the UAE. After pausing the bill to review the sale, the Biden administration confirmed to move forward with the deal on 13 April 2021. In December 2021 UAE withdrew from purchasing F-35s as they did not agree to the additional terms of the transaction from the US. On 14 September 2024, a senior UAE official said that the United Arab Emirates does not expect to resume talks with the U.S. about the F-35.

Accidents and notable incidents

Main article: List of accidents and incidents involving the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II

Various models of the F-35 have been involved in incidents since 2014. They have often involved operator error or mechanical issues, which has set back the program. In comparison to most military aircraft, however, it is described as being safe.

Specifications (F-35A)

F-35A three-view drawing

Data from Lockheed Martin: F-35 specifications, Lockheed Martin: F-35 weaponry, Lockheed Martin: F-35 Program Status, F-35 Program brief, FY2019 Select Acquisition Report (SAR), Director of Operational Test & Evaluation

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 51.4 ft (15.7 m)
  • Wingspan: 35 ft (11 m)
  • Height: 14.4 ft (4.4 m)
  • Wing area: 460 sq ft (43 m)
  • Aspect ratio: 2.66
  • Empty weight: 29,300 lb (13,290 kg)
  • Gross weight: 49,540 lb (22,471 kg)
  • Max takeoff weight: 65,918 lb (29,900 kg)
  • Fuel capacity: 18,250 lb (8,278 kg) internal
  • Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 afterburning turbofan, 28,000 lbf (120 kN) thrust dry, 43,000 lbf (190 kN) with afterburner

Performance

  • Maximum speed: Mach 1.6 at high altitude
    • Mach 1.06, 700 knots (806 mph; 1,296 km/h) at sea level
  • Range: 1,500 nmi (1,700 mi, 2,800 km)
  • Combat range: 669 nmi (770 mi, 1,239 km) interdiction mission (air-to-surface) on internal fuel
    • 760 nmi (870 mi; 1,410 km), air-to-air configuration on internal fuel
  • Service ceiling: 50,000 ft (15,000 m)
  • g limits: +9.0
  • Wing loading: 107.7 lb/sq ft (526 kg/m) at gross weight
  • Thrust/weight: 0.87 at gross weight (1.07 at loaded weight with 50% internal fuel)

Armament

Avionics

Differences between variants

F-35A
CTOL
F-35B
STOVL
F-35C
CV CATOBAR
Length 51.4 ft (15.7 m) 51.2 ft (15.6 m) 51.5 ft (15.7 m)
Wingspan 35 ft (10.7 m) 35 ft (10.7 m) 43 ft (13.1 m)
Height 14.4 ft (4.39 m) 14.3 ft (4.36 m) 14.7 ft (4.48 m)
Wing Area 460 sq ft (42.74 m) 460 sq ft (42.74 m) 668 sq ft (62.06 m)
Empty weight 28,999 lb (13,154 kg) 32,472 lb (14,729 kg) 34,581 lb (15,686 kg)
Internal fuel 18,250 lb (8,278 kg) 13,500 lb (6,123 kg) 19,750 lb (8,958 kg)
Weapons payload 18,000 lb (8,160 kg) 15,000 lb (6,800 kg) 18,000 lb (8,160 kg)
Max takeoff weight 70,000 lb (31,800 kg) class 60,000 lb (27,200 kg) class 70,000 lb (31,800 kg) class
Range >1,200 nmi (2,200 km) >900 nmi (1,700 km) >1,200 nmi (2,200 km)
Combat radius on
internal fuel
669 nmi (1,239 km) 505 nmi (935 km) 670 nmi (1,241 km)
Thrust/weight
 • full fuel:
 • 50% fuel:

0.87
1.07

0.90
1.04

0.75
0.91
g limit +9.0 +7.0 +7.5

Appearances in media

Main article: Aircraft in fiction § F-35 Lightning II

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Notes

  1. As of August 2023, the program was 80% over budget and 10 years late.
  2. Lockheed acquired General Dynamics fighter division at Fort Worth in 1993 and merged with Martin Marietta in 1995 to form Lockheed Martin.
  3. As these were concept demonstrator aircraft for risk reduction, they did not need to have the internal structure or most subsystems of the final aircraft as a weapon system.
  4. The F-35 swivel nozzle design was pioneered by the Convair Model 200.
  5. The thrust vectoring nozzle would eventually be replaced by an axisymmetric low-observable nozzle to reduce weight.
  6. FACO is also performed in Italy and Japan for some partner and export customers as part of the industrial benefits from international cooperation.
  7. This first prototype lacked the weight optimization from SWAT.
  8. Early F-35Bs have a service life as low as 2,100 hours before retrofits as seen on Lot 9 and later aircraft.
  9. Adaptive cycle engine technology had been under development under Air Force Life Cycle Management Center's (AFLCMC) Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) and its precursors.
  10. Turkey was the sole supplier of several F-35 parts, thus forcing the program to find replacement vendors.
  11. The F-35C has additional ailerons at the folding sections of the wings.
  12. In 2014, Michael Gilmore, Director of Operational Test & Evaluation, stated that "software development, integration in the contractor labs, and delivery of mature capability to flight test continued to be behind schedule."
  13. Rockwell Collins and Elbit Systems formed the joint venture Vision Systems International (VSI), later renamed Collins Elbit Vision Systems (CEVS).
  14. In 2002, solid-state laser weapons were reportedly being developed for the F-35.
  15. "Bubbling and blistering" of the horizontal tails and tail booms were observed once during flutter tests of the F-35B and C in late 2011; according to the program office, the problem has only occurred once despite numerous attempts to replicate it, and an improved spray-on coating has been implemented since as a mitigation measure. On 17 December 2019, the Pentagon program office closed the issue with no further actions planned, and instead is imposing a time limit on high-speed flight for the F-35B and C to reduce the risk of damaging the stealth coatings and antennas located on the back of the aircraft.
  16. Wing drop is an uncommanded roll that can occur during high-g transsonic maneuvering.
  17. F-35B and F-35C have the cannon in an external pod with 220 rounds.

References

  1. Finnerty, Ryan (19 January 2024). "Lockheed completes assembly of 1,000th F-35". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  2. ^ Drew, James (31 July 2015). "First operational F-35 squadron declared ready for combat". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020.
  3. ^ Insinna, Valerie (2 August 2016). "Air Force Declares F-35A Ready for Combat". Defense News.
  4. ^ Eckstein, Megan (28 February 2019). "Navy Declares Initial Operational Capability for F-35C Joint Strike Fighter". USNI News.
  5. "F-35 Global Partnerships". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 2 September 2012. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  6. Dudley, Richard (5 March 2012). "Program Partners Confirm Support for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter". Defence Update.
  7. ^ Pawlyk, Oriana (28 December 2020). "Key US Ally Declares Its F-35s Ready for Combat". Military.com. 10th paragraph. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  8. Boehm, Eric (26 April 2022). "The $1.7 Trillion F-35 Fighter Jet Program Is About To Get More Expensive". reason.com. Reason. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
  9. "Lockheed Martin's $1.7 trillion F-35 fighter jet is 10 years late and 80% over budget—and it could be one of the Pentagon's biggest success stories". Fortune. 2 August 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
  10. Miller, Kathleen; Capaccio, Tony & Ivory, Danielle (22 February 2013). "Flawed F-35 Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States". Bloomberg L.P.
  11. Ciralsky, Adam (16 September 2013). "Will the F-35, the U.S. Military's Flaw-Filled, Years-Overdue Joint Strike Fighter, Ever Actually Fly?". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  12. ^ "F-35's price might rise, Lockheed warns". Defense One. 25 July 2024. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
  13. ^ Ahronheim, Anna (22 May 2018). "IAF Commander: Israel First To Use F-35 Jet In Combat". The Jerusalem Post.
  14. ^ "Select Acquisition Report: F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program (F-35) as of FY 2020 President's Budget" (PDF). Washington Headquarters Services. 17 April 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2020. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  15. "US European Command/NATO May Have 450 F-35s by 2030". Aviation Today. 14 June 2021.
  16. Drew, James (25 March 2016). "Lockheed F-35 service life extended to 2070". FlightGlobal.
  17. Rich, Stadler (October 1994). "Common Lightweight Fighter" (PDF). Code One Magazine. Lockheed. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 January 2020.
  18. ^ "History (Pre-JAST)". Joint Strike Fighter. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  19. ^ "History (JAST)". Joint Strike Fighter. Archived from the original on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  20. Barrie, Douglas; Norris, Guy & Warwick, Graham (4 April 1995). "Short take-off, low funding". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 17 July 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  21. ^ "The JSF UK Industry Team". Martin Baker Aircraft Company Limited. Archived from the original on 27 April 2006.
  22. "US, UK sign JAST agreement". Aerospace Daily. New York: McGraw-Hill. 25 November 1995. p. 451.
  23. Renshaw, Kevin (12 August 2014). "F-35B Lightning II Three-Bearing Swivel Nozzle". Code One Magazine.
  24. Wilson, George C. (22 January 2002). "The engine that could". Government Executive. Archived from the original on 19 October 2013.
  25. "Propulsion system for a vertical and short takeoff and landing aircraft, United States Patent 5209428". PatentGenius.com. 7 May 1990. Archived from the original on 25 February 2012.
  26. Gunston, Bill (1997). Yakovlev Aircraft since 1924. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books. p. 16. ISBN 1-55750-978-6.
  27. Welt, Flying (29 October 2023). "Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II: Top 10 things to know". Flying Welt. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  28. ^ Sheridan, Arthur E.; Burnes, Robert (13 August 2019). "F-35 Program History: From JAST to IOC". American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA): 50. doi:10.2514/5.9781624105678.0001.0076. ISBN 978-1-62410-566-1.
  29. Bevilaqua, Paul M. (September 2005). "Joint Strike Fighter Dual-Cycle Propulsion System". Journal of Propulsion and Power. 21 (5): 778–783. doi:10.2514/1.15228. ISSN 0748-4658.
  30. ^ "History (JSF)". Joint Strike Fighter. Archived from the original on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  31. Schreiber, Liev (3 February 2003). "Battle of the X-Planes". NOVA. PBS. Archived from the original on 29 June 2019. Battle of the X-Planes. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  32. "History (F-35 Acquisition)". Joint Strike Fighter. Archived from the original on 6 July 2019. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  33. Parsch, Andreas (27 April 2006). "Non-Standard DOD Aircraft Designations". Designation Systems.
  34. Keijsper 2007, pp. 122, 124.
  35. Hehs, Eric (15 May 2008). "X to F: F-35 Lightning II And Its X-35 Predecessors". Code One Magazine. Lockheed Martin.
  36. Keijsper 2007, p. 119
  37. ^ Norris, Guy (13 August 2010). "Alternate JSF Engine Thrust Beats Target". Aviation Week.
  38. Fulghum, David A.; Wall, Robert (19 September 2004). "USAF Plans for Fighters Change". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  39. Keijsper 2007, p. 124,
  40. Pappalardo, Joe (November 2006). "Weight Watchers: How a team of engineers and a crash diet saved the Joint Strike Fighter". Air & Space Magazine. Archived from the original on 25 May 2014.
  41. Knotts, Keith P. (9 July 2013). "CF-35 Lightning II: Canada's Next Generation Fighter" (PDF). Westdef.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2014.
  42. "'Lightning II' moniker given to Joint Strike Fighter". U.S. Air Force. 7 June 2006.
  43. Rogoway, Tyler (17 May 2018). "The Air Force's Elite Weapons School Has Given The F-35 A New Nickname". The War Zone. Archived from the original on 13 August 2018.
  44. Tegler, Eric (30 December 2023). "5 Things That Happened In 2023 - The Fighter Pilot's Quick-Take". Forbes.
  45. @nellisafb (25 April 2024). "It's World Penguin day! Here are some awesome shots of the F-35 Lightning II, a.k.a. "Battle Penguin"" – via Instagram.
  46. "F-35 Software Development". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 2 July 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  47. "GAO-06-356: DOD Plans to Enter Production before Testing Demonstrates Acceptable Performance" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. March 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  48. Insinna, Valerie (28 April 2018). "F-35 program office wraps up final developmental flight test". Defense News.
  49. Haynes, Deborah (15 June 2019). "F-35 jets: Chinese-owned company making parts for top-secret UK-US fighters". Sky News.
  50. Doffman, Zak (15 June 2019). "U.S. and U.K. F-35 Jets Include 'Core' Circuit Boards From Chinese-Owned Company". Forbes.
  51. Minnick, Wendell (24 March 2016). "Chinese Businessman Pleads Guilty of Spying on F-35 and F-22". Defense News. Retrieved 9 April 2019.
  52. Cox, Bob (1 March 2010). "Internal Pentagon memo predicts that F-35 testing won't be complete until 2016". Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
  53. Capaccio, Tony (6 January 2010). "Lockheed F-35 Purchases Delayed in Pentagon's Fiscal 2011 Plan". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Archived from the original on 10 January 2010.
  54. Charette, Robert (12 September 2012). "F-35 Program Continues to Struggle with Software". IEEE Spectrum.
  55. "FY18 DOD Programs F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)" (PDF). Director, Operational Test and Evaluation. 2018. p. 25. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2019.
  56. "Is the F-35 worth it?". 60 Minutes. 16 February 2014. CBS News.
  57. Tirpak, John (14 March 2016). "All For One and One for All". Air Force.
  58. Shalal, Andrea (27 April 2015). "U.S. watchdog finds quality violations in Pratt work on F-35 engine". Reuters.
  59. Barrett, Paul (10 April 2017). "Danger Zone". Bloomberg Businessweek. pp. 50–55.
  60. Leonard, Christopher. "Lockheed Martin's $1.7 trillion F-35 fighter jet is 10 years late and 80% over budget—and it could be one of the Pentagon's biggest success stories". Fortune. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
  61. Schneider, Greg (27 October 2001). "Lockheed Martin Beats Boeing for Fighter Contract". The Washington Post.
  62. Dao, James (27 October 2001). "Lockheed Wins $200 Billion Deal for Fighter Jet". The New York Times.
  63. Merle, Renae (15 March 2005). "GAO Questions Cost Of Joint Strike Fighter". The Washington Post.
  64. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (17 September 2012). "Pentagon tells Lockheed to shape up on F-35 fighter". Reuters.
  65. Tirpak, John A. (8 January 2014). "The Cost of Teamwork". Air Force. Arlington, Virginia: Air Force Association. Archived from the original on 25 May 2014. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  66. Capaccio, Anthony (10 July 2017). "F-35 Program Costs Jump to $406.5 Billion in Latest Estimate". Bloomberg.
  67. Astore, William J. (16 September 2019). "The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Addiction to the F-35 Fighter". The Nation. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  68. Tirpak, John (29 October 2019). "Massive $34 Billion F-35 Contract Includes Price Drop as Readiness Improves". Air Force.
  69. "F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Development Is Nearly Complete, but Deficiencies Found in Testing Need to Be Resolved" (PDF). GAO. June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 June 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
  70. ^ Insinna, Valerie (12 March 2024). "Pentagon finally approves F-35 for full rate production after 5-year delay". Breaking Defense.
  71. Insinna, Valerie (6 December 2019). "After a couple months delay, the F-35 moves into operational tests". Defense News.
  72. Tirpak, John (25 February 2019). "Keeping the F-35 Ahead of the Bad Guys". Air Force.
  73. "Lockheed Martin Awarded $1.8 Billion for F-35 Block 4 Development". Defense World. 8 June 2019. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
  74. Tegler, Eric. "International F-35 Customers, Your Airplanes Will Be Delayed". Forbes.
  75. Zazulia, Nick (19 March 2019). "U.S. Defense Department Plans to Spend $6.6B on F-35 Continuing Development Through 2024". Avionics International.
  76. ^ Trimble, Steven (9 July 2018). "USAF starts work on defining adaptive engine for future fighter". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 11 January 2020.
  77. "USAF Launches F-35 Advanced Engine Effort". Janes. 31 January 2022.
  78. ^ Marrow, Michael (13 March 2023). "Air Force will not develop new F-35 engine, keeping Pratt as sole contractor". Breaking Defense.
  79. Decker, Audrey (13 July 2023). "F-35 test squadron works to wring out upgrade problems". Defense One. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
  80. Losey, Stephen (21 July 2024). "F-35 deliveries resume, but upgrade delays have ripple effects". Defense News. Retrieved 6 October 2024.
  81. Warwick, Graham (12 September 2013). "Northrop Develops Laser Missile Jammer For F-35". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 20 April 2014. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  82. "Israel Wants To Put New Equipment Inside The F-35: Exclusive Q&A With Top Officer". 21 September 2021.
  83. "Estimated JSF Air Vehicle Procurement Quantities" (PDF). Joint Strike Fighter. April 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2011.
  84. "F-35 Lightning: The Joint Strike Fighter Program, 2012". Defense Industry Daily. 30 October 2012. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013.
  85. Schnasi, Katherine V. (May 2004). "Joint Strike Fighter Acquisition: Observations on the Supplier Base" (PDF). US General Accounting Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 August 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2006.
  86. "Industry Canada F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Canada's Next Generation Fighter Capability". Government of Canada. 18 November 2002. Archived from the original on 22 September 2010. Retrieved 25 November 2010.
  87. Combat Aircraft Monthly, September 2010, p. 24.
  88. Winters, Vice Adm. Mat (9 December 2018). "Head of F-35 Joint Program Office: Stealth fighter enters the new year in midst of a growing phase". Defense News. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  89. Manson, Katrina; Pitel, Laura (19 June 2018). "US Senate blocks F-35 sales to Turkey". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  90. Liptak, Kevin; Gaouette, Nicole (17 July 2019). "Trump blames Obama as he reluctantly bans F-35 sales to Turkey". CNN. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  91. Host, Pat (1 October 2018). "F-35 chief reaffirms Turkey's status as committed programme partner". Jane's 360. Archived from the original on 3 October 2018.
  92. ^ "Capabilities: F-35 Lightning II". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 24 July 2010.
  93. Kent, John R.; Geisel, Chris (16 November 2010). "F-35 STOVL supersonic". Lockheed Martin.
  94. "Open System Architecture (OSA) Secure Processing" (PDF). L3 Technologies. March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 November 2016.
  95. Adams, Charlotte (1 September 2003). "JSF: Integrated Avionics Par Excellence". Aviation Today. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  96. Amaani, USAF Tech. Sgt. Lyle (3 April 2009). "Air Force takes combat air acquisitions priorities to Hill". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  97. CFD predictions of wing pressure distributions on the F-35 at angles-of-attack for transonic maneuvres AIAA 2007 4433
  98. Ryberg, Eric S. (26 February 2002). "The Influence of Ship Configuration on the Design of the Joint Strike Fighter" (PDF). Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division. p. 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 December 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  99. Whittle, Richard (February 2012). "The Ultimate Fighter?". Air & Space/Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 September 2023. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
  100. ^ Hehs, Eric (15 July 2000). "JSF Diverterless Supersonic Inlet". Code One Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 September 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2012.
  101. Sloan, Jeff (19 October 2009). "Skinning the F-35 fighter". Composites World. Archived from the original on 23 October 2023. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  102. "Contract Awarded To Validate Process For JSF". Aerospace Manufacturing and Design. 17 May 2010. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012.
  103. Trimble, Stephen (26 May 2011). "Lockheed Martin reveals F-35 to feature nanocomposite structures". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 30 May 2011.
  104. Nativi, Andy (5 March 2009). "F-35 Air Combat Skills Analyzed". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010.
  105. Crébas, Frank (May 2018). "F-35 – Out of the Shadows". Combat Aircraft Monthly. Key Publishing. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  106. "The F-35's Race Against Time". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Retrieved 7 June 2024.
  107. "Flying The F-35: An Interview With Jon Beesley, F-35 Chief Test Pilot". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 18 December 2014. Retrieved 25 November 2010.
  108. Seligman, Lara (1 March 2016). "Norwegian F-35 Pilot Counters Controversial Dogfighting Report". Defense News. Archived from the original on 26 November 2017.
  109. ^ "F-35 Lightning II Program Status and Fast Facts" (PDF). F-35.ca. Lockheed Martin. 13 March 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 May 2013.
  110. George, Eric (1 May 2010). "F-35 avionics: an interview with the Joint Strike Fighter's director of mission systems and software". Military & Aerospace Electronics (Interview). Vol. 21, no. 5. PennWell Corporation. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016.
  111. Sherman, Ron (1 July 2006). "F-35 Electronic Warfare Suite: More Than Self-Protection". Aviation Today. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  112. Robb, John H. (11 February 2001). "Hey C and C++ Can Be Used In Safety Critical Applications Too!". Journal of Cyber Security and Information Systems. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013.
  113. Warwick, Graham (7 June 2010). "Flight Tests Of Next F-35 Mission-System Block Underway". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  114. "Raytheon Selects RACE++ Multicomputers for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter". EmbeddedStar.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2015. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  115. McHale, John (1 February 2010). "F-35 Joint Strike Fighter leverages COTS for avionics systems". Military & Aerospace Electronics. PennWell Corporation. Archived from the original on 21 September 2013.
  116. Philips, E. H. (5 February 2007). "The Electric Jet". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  117. Parker, Ian (1 June 2007). "Reducing Risk on the Joint Strike Fighter". Aviation Today. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 8 July 2007.
  118. Keller, John (16 June 2013). "Tens of thousands of Xilinx FPGAs to be supplied by Lockheed Martin for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter avionics". Intelligent Aerospace. Archived from the original on 12 January 2014. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
  119. FY2013 DOD PROGRAMS F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
  120. Reed, John (23 November 2010). "Schwartz Concerned About F-35A Delays". DoD Buzz. Archived from the original on 26 November 2010.
  121. ^ Lyle, Amaani (6 March 2014). "Program executive officer describes F-35 progress". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  122. "APG-81 (F-35 Lightning II)". Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2007.
  123. "F-35 Distributed Aperture System (EO DAS)". Northrop Grumman. Archived from the original on 2 April 2010. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
  124. Lemons, Greg; Carrington, Karen; Frey, Dr. Thomas; Ledyard, John (24 June 2018). "F-35 Mission Systems Design, Development, and Verification" (PDF). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.2018-3519. ISBN 978-1-62410-556-2. S2CID 115841087. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  125. "Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control: Joint Strike Fighter Electro-Optical Targeting System". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 11 April 2008.
  126. "ASQ242 Datasheet" (PDF). Northrop Grumman. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 February 2014.
  127. "F-35 jet fighters to take integrated avionics to a whole new level". Military & Aerospace Electronics. PennWell Corporation. 1 May 2003.
  128. "Israel, US Negotiate $450 Million F-35I Avionic Enhancements". Defense Update. 27 July 2012. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012.
  129. Donald, David (17 June 2019). "F-35 Looks to the Future". Aviation International News. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  130. Drew, James (10 September 2015). "Lockheed reveals Advanced EOTS targeting sensor for F-35 Block 4". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 25 February 2020.
  131. Abbott, Rich (18 June 2018). "Raytheon Picked to Produce F-35 Sensor". Aviation Today. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023.
  132. Clark, Colin (15 December 2014). "Pawlikowski On Air Force Offset Strategy: F-35s Flying Drone Fleets". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  133. ^ Helfrich, Emma (3 January 2023). "F-35 Will Get New Radar Under Massive Upgrade Initiative". The Drive. Archived from the original on 19 January 2024. Retrieved 4 January 2023.
  134. "Fast History: Lockheed's Diverterless Supersonic Inlet Testbed F-16". Aviation Intel. 22 October 2012. Archived from the original on 7 September 2013.
  135. Tirpak, John A. (26 November 2014). "The F-35 on Final Approach". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 25 June 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  136. Clark, Colin (11 March 2015). "Threat Data Biggest Worry For F-35A's IOC; But It 'Will Be On Time'". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  137. Clark, Colin (6 June 2014). "Gen. Mike Hostage On The F-35; No Growlers Needed When War Starts". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 11 June 2023.
  138. ^ Butler, Amy (17 May 2010). "New, Classified Stealth Concept Could Affect JSF Maintenance Costs". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021.
  139. "USAF FY00 activity on the JSF". Director, Operational Test & Evaluation. Archived from the original on 23 July 2011.
  140. "Request for Binding Information Response to the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Defence" (PDF). Lockheed Martin. April 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 October 2012 – via Government.no.
  141. Capaccio, Tony (4 May 2011). "Lockheed Martin's F-35 Fighter Jet Passes Initial Stealth Hurdle". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 25 February 2015.
  142. "F-35 – Beyond Stealth". Defense-Update. 14 June 2015. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  143. Ralston, James; Heagy, James; Sullivan, Roger (September 1998). "Environmental/Noise Effects on UHF/VHF UWB SAR" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  144. Plopsky, Guy; Bozzato, Fabrizio (21 August 2014). "The F-35 vs. The VHF Threat". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 June 2023.
  145. Brewer, Jeffrey; Meadows, Shawn (Summer 2006). "Survivability of the Next Strike Fighter". Aircraft Survivability: Susceptibility Reduction. Joint Aircraft Survivability Program Office. p. 23. Archived from the original on 1 December 2012. Retrieved 22 November 2010 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
  146. Lockie, Alex (5 May 2017). "This strange mod to the F-35 kills its stealth near Russian defenses – and there's good reason for that". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 25 December 2023.
  147. Alaimo, Carol Ann (30 November 2008). "Noisy F-35 Still Without A Home". Arizona Daily Star. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023.
  148. "Report on Jet Engine Noise Reduction" (PDF). Naval Research Advisory Committee. April 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2022.
  149. "F-35 Acoustics Based on Edwards AFB Acoustics, Test". JSF Program Office & Lockheed Martin. April 2009.
  150. "F-35, F-16 noise difference small, Netherlands study shows". Aviation Week. 31 May 2016.
  151. Ledbetter, Stewart (31 May 2019). "Wonder no more: F-35 jet noise levels finally confirmed at BTV". NBC News. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023.
  152. Hensley, Senior Airman James (19 May 2015). "F-35 pilot training begins at Luke". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  153. Schutte, John (10 October 2007). "Researchers fine-tune F-35 pilot-aircraft speech system". U.S. Air Force Materiel Command. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 26 January 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  154. "VSI's Helmet Mounted Display System flies on Joint Strike Fighter". Rockwell Collins. 10 April 2007. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011.
  155. "Martin-Baker". The JSF UK Industry Team. Archived from the original on 21 October 2008. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  156. Lowell, Capt. Jonathan (25 August 2019). "Keeping cool over Salt Lake". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 13 August 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  157. Zazulia, Nick (24 August 2018). "F-35: Under the Helmet of the World's Most Advanced Fighter". Avionics International. Archived from the original on 27 December 2023.
  158. ^ Davis, Brigadier General Charles R. (26 September 2006). "F-35 Program Brief" (PDF). U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 July 2020 – via Joint Strike Fighter.
  159. "F-35 Distributed Aperture System EO DAS". YouTube (Video). F35JSFVideos. 4 May 2009. Archived from the original on 17 November 2009. Retrieved 23 November 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  160. Davenport, Christian (1 April 2015). "Meet the most fascinating part of the F-35: The $400,000 helmet". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 1 April 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2015.
  161. Seligman, Lara (14 October 2015). "F-35's Heavier Helmet Complicates Ejection Risks". Defense News. Archived from the original on 17 November 2017.
  162. "Lockheed Martin Awards F-35 Contract". Zack's Investment Research. 17 November 2011. Archived from the original on 30 April 2012.
  163. Warwick, Graham (21 April 2011). "Lockheed Weighs Alternate F-35 Helmet Display". Aviation Week.
  164. Carey, Bill (15 February 2012). "BAE Drives Dual Approach To Fixing F-35 Helmet Display Issues". Aviation International News. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2012.
  165. "Lockheed Martin Selects BAE Systems to Supply F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Helmet Display Solution". BAE Systems. 10 October 2011. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  166. ^ Majumdar, Dave (10 October 2013). "F-35 JPO drops development of BAE alternative helmet". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014.
  167. Williams, Dan (30 October 2012). "Lockheed Cites Good Reports on Night Flights of F-35 Helmet". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
  168. Eshel, Noam (25 August 2010). "Small Diameter Bomb II – GBU-53/B". Defense Update. Archived from the original on 24 September 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2010.
  169. "F-35B STOVL Variant". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 23 February 2009. Retrieved 25 November 2010.
  170. ^ "Spear Capability 3". MBDA Systems. 9 June 2019. Archived from the original on 11 May 2023. This new, F-35 Lightning II internal bay compatible, air-to-surface missile
  171. ^ Marrow, Michael (8 March 2024). "F-35A officially certified to carry nuclear bomb". Breaking Defense.
  172. Keller, John (17 August 2018). "Navy asks BAE Systems to build T-1687/ALE-70(V) electronic warfare (EW) towed decoys for F-35". Military Aerospace Electronics. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  173. Keijsper 2007, pp. 220, 239.
  174. Hewson, Robert (4 March 2008). "UK changes JSF configuration for ASRAAM". Jane's. Archived from the original on 16 September 2012.
  175. Tran, Pierre (22 February 2008). "MBDA Shows Off ASRAAM". Defense News.
  176. "JSF Suite: BRU-67, BRU-68, LAU-147 – Carriage Systems: Pneumatic Actuated, Single Carriage". ITT.com. 2009.
  177. ^ Digger, Davis (30 October 2007). "JSF Range & Airspace Requirements" (PDF). Headquarters Air Combat Command. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 December 2008 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
  178. ^ "F-35 gun system". General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011."GAU-22/A" (PDF). General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011.
  179. ^ Capaccio, Tony (30 January 2020). "The Gun On the Air Force's F-35 Has 'Unacceptable' Accuracy". Bloomberg. Retrieved 25 March 2024.
  180. ^ Trevithick, Joseph (22 March 2024). "F-35A's Beleaguered 25mm Cannon Is Finally "Effective"". The War Zone. Retrieved 25 March 2024.
  181. Keijsper 2007, p. 233.
  182. Donald, David (11 July 2012). "Terma Highlights F-35 Multi-Mission Pod". Aviation International News. Archived from the original on 11 October 2023.
  183. Bolsøy, Bjørnar (17 September 2009). "F-35 Lightning II status and future prospects". F-16.net. Archived from the original on 28 December 2023. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  184. Everstine, Brian W. (17 June 2019). "Lockheed Looking at Extending the F-35's Range, Weapons Suite". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  185. ^ Lake 2010, pp. 37–45.
  186. ^ Trimble, Stephen (17 September 2010). "MBDA reveals clipped-fin Meteor for F-35". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 21 September 2010.
  187. Drew, James (25 February 2015). "F-35B Internal Weapons Bay Can't Fit Required Load of Small Diameter Bomb IIs". Inside Defense.com. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  188. "Air Force President's Budget FY20". Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, Financial Management and Comptroller.
  189. "Important cooperative agreement with Lockheed Martin". Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace. 9 June 2009. Archived from the original on 14 April 2012.
  190. "A Hypersonic Missile That's More Than Ready" (Press release). Lockheed Martin. 22 July 2024.
  191. Fulghum, David A. (8 July 2002). "Lasers being developed for F-35 and AC-130". Aviation Week and Space Technology. Archived from the original on 26 June 2004.
  192. Morris, Jefferson (26 September 2002). "Keeping cool a big challenge for JSF laser, Lockheed Martin says". Aerospace Daily. Archived from the original on 4 June 2004.
  193. Fulghum, David A. (22 July 2002). "Lasers, HPM weapons near operational status". Aviation Week and Space Technology. Archived from the original on 13 June 2004.
  194. Norris, Guy (20 May 2013). "High-Speed Strike Weapon To Build On X-51 Flight". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 20 May 2013.
  195. Drew, James (5 October 2015). "Lockheed considering laser weapon concepts for F-35". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020.
  196. Parsons, Dan (15 February 2015). "USAF chief keeps sights on close air support mission". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020.
  197. "Long Road Ahead For Possible A-10 Follow-On". Aviation Week. 24 March 2015. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  198. "Frequently Asked Questions about JSF". Joint Strike Fighter. Archived from the original on 1 August 2010. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
  199. Warwick, Graham (17 March 2011). "Screech, the F135 and the JSF Engine War". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 21 March 2010. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  200. Katz, Dan (7 July 2017). "The Physics And Techniques Of Infrared Stealth". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  201. Majumdar, Dave (1 October 2012). "US Navy works through F-35C air-ship integration issues". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 2 February 2020. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  202. Chris Wiegand; Bruce A. Bullick; Jeffrey A. Catt; Jeffrey W. Hamstra; Greg P. Walker; Steve Wurth (13 August 2019). "F-35 Air Vehicle Technology Overview". American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics. 257: 121–160. doi:10.2514/5.9781624105678.0121.0160. ISBN 978-1-62410-566-1.
  203. "Custom tool to save weeks in F-35B test and evaluation". U.S. Naval Air Systems Command. 6 May 2011. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  204. Zolfagharifard, Ellie (28 March 2011). "Rolls-Royce's LiftSystem for the Joint Strike Fighter". The Engineer. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  205. "LiftSystem". Rolls-Royce. Archived from the original on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  206. "Swivel nozzle VJ101D and VJ101E". Vertical Flight Society. 20 June 2009.
  207. Hirschberg, Mike (1 November 2000). "V/STOL Fighter Programs in Germany: 1956–1975" (PDF). International Powered Lift Conference. p. 50. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 October 2013. Retrieved 3 October 2012 – via robertcmason.com.
  208. "How the Harrier hovers". Harrier.org. Archived from the original on 7 July 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  209. ^ Kjelgaard, Chris (21 December 2007). "From Supersonic to Hover: How the F-35 Flies". Space.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2023.
  210. Hutchinson, John. "Going Vertical: Developing a STOVL system" (PDF). Ingenia.org.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2015. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  211. "GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team completes study for Netherlands". Rolls-Royce plc. 16 June 2009. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  212. Trimble, Stephen (11 June 2009). "Rolls-Royce: F136 survival is key for major F-35 engine upgrade". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 14 June 2009.
  213. Majumdar, Dave (2 December 2011). "GE, Rolls Royce Stop Funding F-35 Alt Engine". Defense News. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012.
  214. "Pratt & Whitney Validates Growth Option for F135 Engine". Pratt & Whitney. 31 May 2017. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
  215. Kjelgaard, Chris (15 June 2017). "P&W Outlines Three-step F135 Development Pathway". Aviation International News. Archived from the original on 20 January 2024. Retrieved 11 January 2020.
  216. Trimble, Steve (21 July 2020). "F-35 Propulsion Upgrade Moves Forward Despite Uncertainty". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  217. Tirpak, John A. (5 November 2021). "Next-Generation Power for Air Force Fighters". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023.
  218. Zazulia, Nick (11 October 2018). "Rejuvenating the Raptor: Roadmap for F-22 Modernization". Avionics Today. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 15 February 2019.
  219. Majumdar, Dave (6 November 2012). "US Air Force praises early performance of Lockheed Martin F-35". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020.
  220. Edwards, Jack E. (16 December 2010). "Defense Management: DOD Needs to Monitor and Assess Corrective Actions Resulting from Its Corrosion Study of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 17 December 2010.
  221. Trimble, Stephen (12 July 2010). "Farnborough: Lockheed encouraged by pace of F-35 testing". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 12 December 2019.
  222. "Li-Ion Battery in Production for F-35s". Avionics International. 23 July 2013. Archived from the original on 25 January 2020. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  223. Hawkins, Dan (27 July 2012). "F-35 maintenance training spawns USMC's first air FTD". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  224. "F-35, Maintenance and the Challenge of Service Standardization". Second Line of Defense. 9 June 2011. Archived from the original on 4 July 2011.
  225. Marrow, Michael (21 September 2023). "Only 55 percent of F-35s mission capable, putting depot work in spotlight: GAO". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023.
  226. Majumdar, Dave (20 November 2012). "USMC finds workaround for cyber vulnerability on F-35 logistics system". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 12 December 2019.
  227. Tucker, Patrick (8 January 2015). "The F-35 Has To Phone Texas Before Taking Off". Defense One. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  228. Host, Pat (22 January 2020). "Pentagon announces replacement for F-35's ALIS". Jane's. Archived from the original on 23 January 2020.
  229. ^ Land, Michael (29 July 2021). "F-35 testers recommend fielding logistics software update". DC Military. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  230. ^ Clark, Colin (13 August 2021). "ALIS Is Dying; Long Live F-35's ODIN". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023.
  231. "F-35 Joint Program Office begins deployment of new logistics hardware to F-35 squadrons". Defense Visual Information Distribution Service. 9 August 2021. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  232. "Mighty F-35 Lightning II Engine Roars to Life". Lockheed Martin. 20 September 2006.
  233. Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011 (Report).
  234. Wolf, Jim (18 March 2010). "F-35 fighter makes first vertical landing". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  235. Hudson, Mary L.; Glass, Michael L.; Tucker, Lt Col Tucker; Somers, C. Eric; Caldwell, Robert C. (24 June 2018). "F-35 System Development and Demonstration Flight Testing at Edwards Air Force Base and Naval Air Station Patuxent River". American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA): 27. doi:10.2514/6.2018-3371. ISBN 978-1-62410-556-2. S2CID 116177609.
  236. Branch, Ricardo (8 March 2012). "Northern Edge fields new radar system". Northern Edge Joint Information Bureau. Archived from the original on 27 October 2013.
  237. Saiki, Tracey (28 June 2011). "Continued testing of F-35 JSF sensors a success at Northern Edge 2011". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
  238. Majumdar, Dave (17 January 2012). "F-35C Tailhook Design Blamed for Landing Issues". Defense News. Archived from the original on 2 January 2013.
  239. ^ Majumdar, Dave (12 December 2013). "Lockheed: New Carrier Hook for F-35". U.S. Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  240. Sweetman, Bill (June 2009). "Get out and fly". Defense Technology International. pp. 43–44. Archived from the original on 18 August 2009.
  241. Trimble, Stephen (22 November 2010). "Fatigue cracks raise questions about key decision in F-35 redesign". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020.
  242. Insinna, Valerie & Larter, David (12 June 2019). "Supersonic speeds could cause big problems for the F-35's stealth coatings". Defense News.
  243. Larter, David B.; Insinna, Valerie & Mehta, Aaron (24 April 2020). "The Pentagon will have to live with limits on F-35's supersonic flights". Defense News. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  244. ^ "FY2019 DOT&E Report – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)" (PDF). dote.osd.mil. 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 February 2020.
  245. Capaccio, Tony (21 February 2014). "Lockheed F-35 for Marines Delayed as Test Exposes Cracks". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 14 July 2015.
  246. F-35A High Angle of Attack Operational Maneuvers. Lockheed Martin (Report). 14 January 2015.
  247. Clark, Colin (19 July 2017). "Pilots Say F-35 Superior Within Visual Range: Dogfight Criticisms Laid To Rest". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022.
  248. "F-35B completes first sea trials on USS Wasp". Naval Air Systems Command. 24 October 2011. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 17 July 2012.
  249. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (29 August 2013). "U.S. Marines see progress in F-35 testing despite challenges". Reuters. Archived from the original on 15 October 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
  250. "F-35B Pilots Conduct Night Shipboard Landing Without Night-Vision". Inside the Navy. Inside Washington Publishers. 9 February 2013. Retrieved 19 September 2013.
  251. "F-35B Complete At-Sea Developmental Testing". Naval Aviation News. 14 March 2017. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  252. "Navy jets trial new 'rolling' landing". BBC News. 15 October 2018. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2019.
  253. "F-35C Completes First Night Flight Aboard Aircraft Carrier". U.S. Navy. 13 November 2014. Archived from the original on 10 July 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
  254. Cavas, Christopher (17 August 2016). "F-35C Back at Sea for 3rd Round of Carrier Tests". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  255. Grady, John (11 October 2018). "Preliminary F-35C Feedback is Positive, As Formal Operational Testing Begins This Fall". U.S. Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023.
  256. Capaccio, Anthony (23 October 2017). "F-35s Hobbled by Parts Shortages, Slow Repairs, Audit Finds". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 23 October 2017.
  257. "The Hidden Troubles of the F-35". Defense News.
  258. Insinna, Valerie (24 April 2020). "The Pentagon has cut the number of serious F-35 technical flaws in half". Defense News. Archived from the original on 27 April 2020.
  259. "F-35 Finally Can Use All Its Weapons In Combat". Aviation Week. 5 March 2018.
  260. "Air Force issues flight release for Eglin AFB F-35A". U.S. Air Force. 28 February 2012. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013.
  261. Capaccio, Tony (28 September 2012). "Air Force Expands F-35 Trials Over Tester's Objections". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Archived from the original on 18 January 2013.
  262. Clark, Colin (28 August 2012). "Pentagon's Testing Czar Questions F-35 Program's OTE Plan". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 31 August 2012.
  263. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (10 September 2012). "More problems raised at Pentagon F-35 fighter review". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  264. Majumdar, Dave (16 November 2012). "USAF unit completes F-35 OUE activity". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 25 May 2014.
  265. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (27 February 2012). "USMC Near Start of F-35 Training Flights". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  266. Majumdar, Dave (21 November 2012). "Simulation plays vital role in building F-35 tactics and aircraft development". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 15 September 2020.
  267. Everstine, Brian (17 December 2012). "F-35 pilot training starts next month at Eglin". Military Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  268. "65th Aggressor Squadron reactivates at Nellis with aggressor force of F-35s". U.S. Air Force. 9 June 2022. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  269. Burgess, Richard R. (28 May 2019). "Navy Deactivates First F-35C Replacement Squadron, Merges With Second". Sea Power Magazine. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  270. Hunter, Jamie (10 July 2020). "How The F-35 Triggered Topgun's Biggest Syllabus Revamp In Nearly Four Decades". The Drive. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  271. Reidinger, Staci (21 November 2012). "First Operational F-35 Squadron honored in historic ceremony". Defense Visual Information Distribution Service. Archived from the original on 23 May 2023. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
  272. Davenport, Christian (15 September 2015). "Pentagon weapons tester calls F-35 evaluation into question". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015.
  273. Bardo, J. T. (1 August 2016). "Executive Summary of VMFA-121 Support of Red Flag 16-3". DocumentCloud. United States Marine Corps. Archived from the original on 26 March 2019.
  274. Ali, Idrees; Stone, Mike (27 September 2018). "F-35 jet used by U.S. in combat for first time". Reuters. Archived from the original on 27 September 2018. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  275. "Marines Propose Rapidly Mobile F-35 Operations". Aviation Week. 16 December 2014.
  276. Eckstein, Megan (23 April 2019). "Marines Folding F-35B into New Pacific Island-Hopping Concept". U.S. Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 26 December 2023.
  277. Jennings, Gareth (6 January 2022). "USMC deploys F-35C for first time". Janes. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024.
  278. Seck, Hope Hodge (26 September 2024). "'Cool Birds': Afghan general describes awe of first F-35 encounter". Military Times. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  279. Trevithick, Joseph (12 November 2024). "F-35C Naval Joint Strike Fighters Fly Combat Missions Against Houthis In Yemen". The War zone. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  280. Lockie, Alex (8 February 2017). "The F-35 slaughtered the competition in its latest test". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 26 July 2021.
  281. "U.S. Air Force's F-35A Lightning II arrives for first Middle East deployment". U.S. Air Forces Central. 15 April 2019. Archived from the original on 3 June 2023.
  282. "U.S. Air Force F-35As conduct first combat employment". U.S. Air Force. 30 April 2019. Archived from the original on 10 January 2024.
  283. Hoyle, Craig (19 December 2021). "First European-based US Air Force F-35As arrive at Lakenheath home". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 19 December 2021.
  284. Cenciotti, David (9 January 2015). "RAF Lakenheath was selected as the first base to host USAFE F-35s". The Aviationist. Archived from the original on 25 September 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
  285. Cohen, Rachel S. (2 May 2019). "JPO Seeks to Slash F-35A Flight-Hour Costs". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023.
  286. Thompson, Mark (2 April 2013). "Costly Flight Hours". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Archived from the original on 17 January 2024. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  287. Reim, Garrett (30 January 2020). "Lockheed Martin sees F-35 production rising to 180 units per year, despite high flying costs". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020.
  288. "Thousands of sailors deploy with USS Carl Vinson strike group". FOX 5 San Diego. 2 August 2021. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024.
  289. "F-35B Lightning". Royal Air Force. Retrieved 30 August 2019.
  290. "Major Projects Report 2008". Ministry of Defence. Archived from the original on 7 August 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  291. "US Marines eye UK JSF shipborne technique". FlightGlobal. 15 June 2007. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012.
  292. "Military Aircraft: Written question – 60456". UK Parliament. 17 January 2017. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
  293. "Royal Air Force's No. 617 Squadron to fly F-35B fighter". Airforce Technology. 19 July 2013. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023.
  294. "Dambusters to be first Lightning II squadron". Ministry of Defence. 18 July 2013. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024.
  295. "17 Squadron Standard Parade". Royal Air Force. 12 April 2013. Archived from the original on 28 August 2013. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  296. "Third Joint Strike Fighter for the UK arrives". Royal Air Force. 28 June 2013. Archived from the original on 1 July 2013.
  297. "Navy's new F-35 jump jet flies from trademark ski ramp for first time". Royal Navy. 25 June 2015. Archived from the original on 7 July 2015. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  298. "Identity of F-35 Lightning Training Squadron Announced". Royal Air Force. 5 July 2017. Archived from the original on 28 July 2017.
  299. "Second Lightning Fight Jet Squadron Arrives In UK". Royal Air Force. 17 July 2019. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  300. "RAF's legendary Dambusters squadron reforms to fly F-35 jets". Ministry of Defence. 18 April 2018. Archived from the original on 6 April 2023.
  301. "Britain's most advanced jets touch down on home soil". Ministry of Defence. 6 June 2018. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
  302. Nicholls, Dominic (10 January 2019). "New RAF jet 'combat ready' in face of resurgent Russia threat". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022.
  303. "UK's most advanced jets deploy overseas for the first time". Ministry of Defence. 8 April 2019. Archived from the original on 10 January 2024.
  304. "F-35 fighter jets join fight against IS". BBC News. 25 June 2019. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023.
  305. "First UK fighter jets land onboard HMS Queen Elizabeth". Ministry of Defence. 13 October 2019. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024.
  306. "F-35 Lightnings depart for Exercise RED FLAG in USA". Royal Air Force. 22 January 2020. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  307. ^ Allison, George (21 November 2022). "Britain takes delivery of more F-35 jets". UK Defence Journal. Archived from the original on 10 April 2023.
  308. "809 Squadron Stood Up". December 2023.
  309. "Immortal air squadron to fly Royal Navy's newest jets". Royal Navy. 9 September 2013. Archived from the original on 1 October 2020. Retrieved 21 March 2015 – via National Archives.
  310. Hunter, Jamie (15 March 2021). "Top British F-35 Pilot On How His Fledgling Team Is Forging Its Own Path Forward". The Drive. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  311. ^ "RAAF F-35s achieve 1,000 flying hour milestone". Australian Aviation. 12 June 2020. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  312. ^ Wroe, David (3 March 2017). "Joint Strike Fighters: Australian military stealth unveiled at Avalon Airshow". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  313. "PM's landing at Williamtown". Port Stephens Examiner. 10 February 2021. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  314. ^ "Final F-35A aircraft delivered". Department of Defence (Press release). 19 December 2024. Retrieved 20 December 2024.
  315. "Israel Declares F-35I Adir Combat Capable". F-35 Lightning II. Archived from the original on 26 September 2020. Retrieved 9 December 2017.
  316. Novak, Jake (18 July 2019). "The F-35 has already freaked out Iran and changed everything in the Middle East". CNBC. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022.
  317. Okbi, Yasser; Hashavua, Maariv (29 March 2018). "Report: Israeli stealth fighters fly over Iran". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 29 March 2018.
  318. Williams, Dan (22 May 2018). "Israel says it is the first country to use U.S.-made F-35 in combat". Reuters. Archived from the original on 6 November 2023.
  319. Kubovich, Yaniv (23 May 2018). "A Message of Superiority: This Is the Israeli Army's Photo of an F-35 Over Beirut". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 7 December 2022.
  320. Bachner, Michael (30 July 2019). "Israel said to hit Iranian sites in Iraq, expanding strikes on missile shipments". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 9 May 2023.
  321. Trevithick, Joseph (25 May 2017). "Israel Is Getting A Single F-35 Test Jet Unlike Any Other". The Drive. Archived from the original on 6 November 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  322. Jennings, Gareth (12 November 2020). "Israel receives F-35I testbed to develop national capabilities". Jane's. Archived from the original on 19 October 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  323. "מבצע "שומר החומות" – סיכום 11.05". idf.il (in Hebrew). 11 May 2021. Archived from the original on 1 October 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  324. Zitun, Yoav (6 March 2022). "Israel shot down Iranian drones en route to Gaza, IDF says". Ynetnews. Archived from the original on 7 November 2023.
  325. D'Urso, Stefano (12 October 2023). "Configuration And Payload Of The Aircraft Employed By Israel In The Fight Against Hamas". The Aviationist. Archived from the original on 14 January 2024.
  326. Carlin, Maya (12 October 2023). "Meet the F-35I Adir: Israel Has a 'Stealth' Fighter Not Even America Has". 19FortyFive. Archived from the original on 18 November 2023.
  327. Osborn, Kris (18 October 2023). "Is Israel Using It's Special "Adir" F-35i Variant to Attack Hamas?". Warrior Maven: Center for Military Modernization. Archived from the original on 20 November 2023.
  328. Frantzman, Seth J. (2 November 2023). "Israel uses F-35I to shoot down cruise missile, a first for Joint Strike Fighter". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023.
  329. "Israel strikes Yemeni port with advanced F-35I Adir jets". MSN. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  330. "Behind the scenes of Israeli attack: Over 100 aircraft and a 2,000 km journey to Iran". The Jerusalem Post. 26 October 2024. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  331. Kington, Tom (30 November 2018). "Italy F-35s reach initial operating capability". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  332. Yeo, Mike (1 April 2019). "Asia allies take major steps forward with F-35 rollout". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  333. Gady, Franz-Stefan (1 April 2019). "Japan Air Self Defense Force Stands Up First F-35A Lightning II Fighter Squadron". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023.
  334. Host, Pat (7 November 2019). "Norway declares F-35A initial operational capability". Jane's. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  335. Sprenger, Sebastian (6 January 2022). "Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  336. Fouche, Gwladys (23 September 2023). "Lockheed Martin F-35A fighter jets land on motorway". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 October 2023. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  337. ^ Jennings, Gareth (29 December 2021). "Netherlands declares IOC for F-35". Jane's. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  338. Defense White Paper 2022 (PDF). Dutch Ministry of Defense. 19 July 2022. p. 28.
  339. Waldron, Greg (2 August 2012). "In Focus: Tokyo casts wary eye on Chinese airpower developments". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020.
  340. Ewing, Philip (19 June 2012). "Lockheed's comprehensive Q&A on the F-35". DoD Buzz. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012.
  341. ^ "F-35 Lightning Drag Chute". Code One Magazine. 13 August 2014. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  342. Hancock, Ben D. (1997). "The STOVL Joint Strike Fighter in Support of the 21st Century Marine Corps". Defense Technical Information Center.
  343. Bly, Peter (14 June 2011). "Constructability of a High Temperature Concrete Pad" (PDF). Geotechnical & Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  344. Norris, Guy (24 April 2014). "Pilot reaction to flying the F-35B". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
  345. Dsouza, Larkins (16 March 2010). "F-35B STOVL-mode Flight". Defence Aviation. Archived from the original on 15 August 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2010.
  346. ^ "FY2019 President's Budget Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)" (PDF). esd.whs.mil. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 March 2019.
  347. Kalman, Aaron (18 April 2013). "Jet's name is just plane 'Awesome'". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022.
  348. "Israel's first F-35 Lightning II takes flight". Lockheed Martin. 26 July 2016. Archived from the original on 28 July 2017. Retrieved 4 August 2016.
  349. Ben-David, Alon (27 August 2010). "Israel To Buy F-35s With Cockpit Mods". Aviation Week.
  350. Ben-David, Alon; Butler, Amy & Wall, Robert (7 July 2011). "Israel, U.S. Strike F-35 Technology Deal". Aviation Week.
  351. David, Eshel; Fulghum, David (6 August 2012). "Israel, U.S. Agree To $450 Million In F-35 EW Work". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013.
  352. Trimble, Stephen (22 January 2010). "Israel sets sights on two-seater F-35". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020.
  353. Egozi, Arie (11 January 2008). "Israel to boost range of future F-35 fleet". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020.
  354. Frankel, Julia (2 July 2023). "Israel to buy more F-35 fighter jets from US. Deal expands fleet by 50% and deepens partnership". AP News. Archived from the original on 19 December 2023.
  355. Bob, Yonah Jeremy (30 April 2023). "As F-35 deals move forward in US, where does Israel stand? - analysis". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024.
  356. Daly, Brian (1 September 2010). "Harper, Ignatieff spar over fighter jets". Calgary Sun. Archived from the original on 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  357. Berthiaume, Lee (20 December 2012). "Military will contract out air-to-air refuelling if Canada goes with F-35". Canada.com. Archived from the original on 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  358. Yalkin, Tolga R.; Weltman, Peter (10 March 2011). "An Estimate of the Fiscal Impact of Canada's Proposed Acquisition of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter". Office of the Parliamentary Budget Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2014.
  359. "A New Plan For a Strong Middle Class" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada. 5 October 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 October 2015. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  360. Drew, James (21 October 2015). "Canadian F-35 exit could signal wider air force review". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  361. "Future Fighter Capability Project - Defence Capabilities Blueprint". Canadian Department of National Defence. 30 May 2018. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  362. Brewster, Murray (28 March 2022). "Liberals launch negotiations to buy F-35 fighter jets". CBC News. Archived from the original on 18 November 2022. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  363. "Future fighter capability project". National Defence (canada.ca). 9 January 2023. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  364. Dubois, Gastón (21 June 2022). "Nine fully operational Canadian F-35 stealth fighters by 2027?". Aviacionline.com. Archived from the original on 5 January 2023.
  365. "Swedish jet maker complains Ottawa not following rules with F-35 negotiations". CTV News. 30 September 2022. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023.
  366. Anita Anand, Minister of Defence (9 January 2023). "Announcement regarding the F-35 acquisition". National Defence (canada.ca). Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  367. Berthiaume, Lee (9 January 2023). "Canada ends years-long search for new fighter jet with deal to buy F-35s". CTV News. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  368. Parken, Oliver (9 January 2023). "Canada Closes Deal for 88 F35s to Finally Replace Its Aging CF18s". The Drive. Archived from the original on 24 March 2023. Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  369. Jennings, Gareth (20 December 2021). "Lockheed Martin to design and develop F-35 variant 'tailored' for foreign customer". Janes. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  370. "Belgium receives first F-35". Janes.com. 11 December 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
  371. "F-35 delivery delays: a problem for European air forces - War Wings Daily". 25 March 2024. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
  372. Emmott, Robin (25 October 2018). "Belgium picks Lockheed's F-35 over Eurofighter on price". Reuters. Brussels. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018.
  373. "Luchtmachtbasissen moeten verbouwd worden voor F-35: 275 miljoen euro". Het Nieuwsblad (in Dutch). 8 July 2019. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019.
  374. "Danish F-35 aircraft achieve new milestone in the USA". Air Recognition. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  375. "Agreement on Procurement for New Fighters" (PDF). Danish Ministry of Defence (in Danish). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 October 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2016.
  376. "Det første F-35, der skal til Danmark, er nu leveret i USA" (in Danish). Forsvaret. 1 May 2023. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  377. "Denmark's First F-35s Arrive at Skrydstrup Air Base". www.f35.com. 14 September 2023. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
  378. "Israel receives new F-35 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin, bolstering arsenal". I24news. 23 July 2023. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024.
  379. Mathew, Arun. "Unique F-35I Test Aircraft Arrives in Israel". DefPost. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  380. Ahronheim, Anna (26 November 2018). "Air Force Bolsters Stealth Power as More F-35I Fighter Jets Land in Israel". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022.
  381. Israel, David (2 July 2023). "Israel to Purchase 3rd F-35 Squadron, Will Up Number of Stealth Fighters to 75". Jewishpress. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023.
  382. Kington, Tom (28 May 2020). "Italy defense minister commits to F-35 after calls to suspend program". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
  383. ^ Kington, Tom (21 October 2020). "Italy's Navy-Air Force tussle over the F-35 comes to a head". Defense News. Archived from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  384. ^ "F-35 Lightning II: Creating Jobs. Securing Italy's Future" (PDF). F35.com. Lockheed Martin. February 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2021. Aeronautica Militare is programmed to receive 60 F-35A CTOLs and 15 F-35B STOVLs, while Marina Militare is programmed to acquire 15 F-35B STOVLs.
  385. ^ Cenciotti, David (29 March 2023). "Future Base, Expected FOC And More About The Italian F-35 Fleet". The Aviationist. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 7 April 2023.
  386. "Italy announced its intentions to acquire Typhoons and 25 F-35s". 17 September 2024. Retrieved 18 September 2024.
  387. ^ Giansiracusa, Aurelio. "Ulteriori venticinque F-35 per Aeronautica e Marina Militare". Ares Difesa. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
  388. Gady, Franz-Stefan (1 April 2019). "Japan Air Self Defense Force Stands Up First F-35A Lightning II Fighter Squadron". The Diplomat.
  389. Kelly, Tim; Kubo, Nobuhiro (21 February 2018). "Exclusive: Japan to buy at least 20 more F-35A stealth fighters". Reuters. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
  390. Harding, Robin (18 December 2018). "Japan to expand military with 100 more F-35 stealth fighters". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  391. "Defence of Japan 2022 (Annual White Paper)" (PDF). Ministry of Defence (Japan) (in Japanese). p. 53. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 December 2022.
  392. "World Air Forces 2014" (PDF). Flight Global Insight. 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 February 2014.
  393. "Netherlands Orders Eight F-35s". Aviation Week. 26 March 2015. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  394. "Defence spending to be stepped up, more tanks and F-35 jets". DutchNews.nl. 14 December 2018. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  395. Silvestris, Elia (27 September 2024). "End of an Era: Bidding Farewell to the F-16 in the RNLAF After 45 Years of Service". The Aviationist. Retrieved 28 September 2024.
  396. "Norge har mottatt 37 F-35". Forsvaret (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 11 August 2024.
  397. "Norway receives another three F-35As". key.aero. 13 August 2021. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  398. "Northrop Grumman completes center fuselage for first Norwegian F-35 aircraft". F-35 Lightning II. Archived from the original on 24 June 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  399. Insinna, Valerie (11 October 2019). "Norway's F-35s have a problem with a unique piece of gear". Defense News. Archived from the original on 13 October 2019.
  400. Sang-ho, Song (27 January 2022). "S. Korea's Air Force completes deployment of 40 F-35A fighters: sources". Yonhap News Agency. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
  401. Vavasseur, Xavier (4 September 2020). "South Korea to Double Down on F-35 and Procure STOVL Variant for LPX-II". Naval News. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  402. Waldron, Greg (13 April 2020). "USA approves $675 million support package for Korean F-35s". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 13 August 2020. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
  403. Smith, Josh (20 December 2017). "South Korea plans to buy 20 additional F-35 aircraft: report". Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.
  404. Yeo, Mike (14 September 2023). "US State Department approves South Korea to buy 25 more F-35A jets". Defense News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  405. Farley, Robert (2 January 2018). "Who Wants to Operate Carrier-Based F-35Bs in Asia? Apparently, Japan and South Korea". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023.
  406. "S. Korea begins procedures to introduce F-35B fighters for light aircraft carrier". Yonhap News Agency. 5 August 2020. Archived from the original on 28 September 2023.
  407. "'경항모' 기사회생했지만 탑재 전투기는 F-35B 뿐… 가성비 논란 '여전'" [The 'light aircraft carrier' was revived, but the only aircraft on board was the F-35B... The cost-effectiveness controversy 'still persists']. 한국일보 (in Korean). 6 December 2021. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  408. Allison, George (17 March 2024). "Britain takes delivery of more new F-35 stealth jets". UK Defence Journal. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
  409. "UK receives final TR-2 standard F-35s". Janes. 26 March 2024. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
  410. Allison, George (23 May 2024). "Britain takes delivery of more new F-35 jets". UK Defence Journal. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
  411. "Probe after British F-35 fighter crashes in Mediterranean". BBC News. 17 November 2021. Archived from the original on 11 May 2022.
  412. Allison, George (4 November 2021). "More F-35 jets delivered to the UK". UK Defence Journal. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  413. "Further five F-35 fighter jets land at new RAF Marham home". ITV News. 4 August 2018. Archived from the original on 6 April 2023.
  414. "Lockheed Martin-Built F-35 Comes Home to RAF Marham". F35.com. Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 14 September 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  415. "UK receives final F-35 test aircraft". Janes Defence Weekly. Vol. 53, no. 16. 20 April 2016.
  416. Urban, Mark (24 November 2015). "Defence Review: Fighting old battles?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 20 January 2024. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  417. Allison, George (23 March 2021). "UK looking at '60 and then maybe up to 80′ F-35B jets". UK Defence Journal. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023.
  418. Glaze, Ben (8 September 2022). "UK will buy a maximum of 74 Lightning stealth warplanes - 64 fewer than planned". Daily Mirror. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  419. Allison, George (6 February 2024). "UK appears to recommit to full order of 138 F-35Bs". Retrieved 6 February 2024.
  420. Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Budget Estimates: Air Force – Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Justification Book (PDF) (Report). Vol. 1. March 2024. p. 6. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
  421. ^ "2024 World Air Forces directory". Flightglobal Insight. 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  422. ^ Reim, Garrett (18 April 2018). "DOD reveals F-35 multiyear procurement strategy to start in 2021". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021.
  423. Defence, National (9 January 2023). "Announcement regarding the F-35 acquisition". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  424. Berthiaume, Lee (20 December 2022). "Defence Department gets OK to spend $7 billion on 16 F-35 fighter jets: CP sources". CTV News. Archived from the original on 21 December 2022. Retrieved 21 December 2022.
  425. Brewster, Murray (9 January 2023). "Federal government inks deal to buy fleet of F-35 fighter jets". CBC News. Archived from the original on 9 January 2023. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  426. Lehrfeld, Jonathan (30 June 2023). "US State Dept. clears $5.6 billion sale of F-35s for Czech Republic". Defense News.
  427. Ferran, Lee (29 January 2024). "Czech Republic joins F-35 ranks, inks 'most important' deal with US for 24 aircraft". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
  428. McNeil, Harry (27 September 2024). "Lockheed Martin secures deal to integrate F-35s to Czech Republic". Airforce Technology. Retrieved 21 November 2024.
  429. "Finland signs F-35 fighter jet deal". News. 11 February 2022.
  430. "The Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II is Finland's next multi-role fighter". Ministry of Defence (Finland). 10 December 2021. Archived from the original on 3 January 2024.
  431. Ristamäki, Juha; Nurmi, Lauri (5 December 2021). "IL:n tiedot: Puolustusvoimat esittää yhdysvaltalaista F-35:ttä Suomen uudeksi hävittäjäksi" [Information from IL: The Defense Forces presents the US F-35 as Finland's new fighter]. Iltalehti (in Finnish). Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  432. Sabak, Juliusz (29 July 2022). "Niemcy: Wielki zakup F-35 z uzbrojeniem za 8,4 mld dolarów" [Germany: Major purchase of F-35 with weapons for $8.4 billion]. defence24.pl (in Polish). Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  433. "Germany Becomes Latest Country to Join the F-35 Lightning II Global Team". Lockheed Martin. 14 December 2022. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2022.
  434. "Germany Is in Talks to Buy 10 Additional F-35 Fighter Jets". Bloomberg, 7 June 2024.
  435. Lee, Matthew (27 January 2024). "US approves sale of F-16 jets to Turkey, F-35s to Greece". Defense News. Retrieved 2 February 2024.
  436. "Greece signs deal to buy 20 US-made F-35 jets in major military overhaul". AP News. 25 July 2024. Retrieved 16 August 2024.
  437. "Greece Becomes Newest Member Of The F-35 Lightning II Global Alliance". news.lockheedmartin.com. 25 July 2024.
  438. Adamowski, Jaroslaw (31 January 2020). "Poland inks $4.6 billion contract for F-35 fighter jets". Defense News. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020.
  439. Kaleta, Włodzimierz (8 December 2023). "Amerykanie oblatują F-35 dla Polski" [Americans are test-flying the F-35 for Poland]. wnp.pl (in Polish). Archived from the original on 14 January 2024. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  440. Graf, Jędrzej (27 July 2022). "Poland to Buy 1,000 MBTs. Minister Błaszczak Also Outlines a Plan To Procure Extra F-35s or F-15s". Defence24. Archived from the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
  441. "Romania Becomes the 20th Member of the F-35 Global Alliance". lockheedmartin.com. 21 November 2024.
  442. Victor Cozmei (21 November 2024). "OFICIAL România a semnat contractul cu SUA pentru 32 de avioane de vânătoare F-35". HotNews (in Romanian).
  443. Stan, Valentin (28 August 2024). "Armata Română a publicat proiectul de lege pentru achiziția de avioane F-35. Când vor fi scoase F-16 din dotarea Forțelor Aeriene". Digi24 (in Romanian).
  444. "Singapore to buy 8 F-35A fighter jets, adding to 12 F-35Bs it ordered earlier: Ng Eng Hen". Today Online yea= 2024. Retrieved 28 February 2024.
  445. Tham, Davina (24 February 2023). "Singapore to acquire 8 more F-35B fighter jets, growing fleet to 12". Channel News Asia. Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  446. "Air2030: Beschaffungsvertrag für die Kampfflugzeuge F-35A unterzeichnet" (in German). Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport. 19 September 2022. Archived from the original on 27 February 2023. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  447. "Schweiz unterzeichnet Kaufvertrag für F-35" (in German). Tagesanzeiger. 19 September 2022. Archived from the original on 6 March 2023. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  448. Carlin, Maya (28 October 2023). "Why Won't America Sell F-35 Stealth Fighters to Taiwan?". The National Interest. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  449. "Taiwan plans to request F-35s from US". Taipei Times. 20 September 2011. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
  450. Shim, Elizabeth (28 April 2017). "Taiwan's plan to buy F-35 fighter jets riles China". United Press International. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 17 October 2017.
  451. Yeo, Mike (16 March 2018). "Taiwan renews interest in F-35 to counter Chinese first strike". Defense News. Melbourne. Archived from the original on 18 March 2018. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
  452. Zhezheng, Hong (28 November 2018). "放棄F-35 我擬對美採購66架F-16V新戰機" (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 29 November 2018. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  453. Nanuam, Wassana (12 January 2022). "Air force eyes B13.8bn jets purchase". Bangkok Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  454. Nanuam, Wassana (31 December 2021). "Air force eyes F-35 stealth jets". Bangkok Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  455. "ผบ.ทอ. ประกาศซื้อ F-35 อีกครั้ง พร้อม MUM-T เผยเสนอในปีงบ 66 นี้เลย" [Air Force Commander announces purchase of F-35 again, with MUM-T revealed to be offered in fiscal year 2023.]. thaiarmedforce (in Thai). 31 December 2021. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  456. Nanuam, Wassana (22 May 2023). "US Pentagon set to rebuff Thailand's bid for F-35s". Bangkok Post. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  457. Kelly, Fergus (21 June 2018). "Turkey receives F-35s from Lockheed, despite US Senate ban". The Defense Post. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  458. "Turkey to Order Four More F-35 Fighter Jets". F-35.com. Archived from the original on 21 November 2019. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  459. "Turkey Plans More F-35 Orders After Receiving First Batch in 2018". Haaretz. Reuters. 28 October 2016. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022.
  460. Pawlyk, Oriana (16 June 2019). "Trump: Turkey Will Be Out of F-35 Fighter Jet Program After S-400 Buy". Military.com. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023.
  461. ^ Finnerty, Ryan (23 January 2023). "US, Turkish defence officials meet for second round of F-35 discussions". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023.
  462. ^ Jennings, Gareth (24 January 2023). "US, Turkey continue talks to settle F-35 dispute". Janes. Archived from the original on 3 August 2023.
  463. ^ "US to buy eight F-35 jets originally built for Turkey". TRT World. Reuters. 21 July 2020. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023.
  464. ^ Insinna, Valerie (21 July 2020). "It's official: US Air Force to buy Turkish F-35s". Defense News. Archived from the original on 21 July 2020.
  465. "F-35'lerin ilk teslimat töreni ABD'de gerçekleşti" [The first delivery ceremony of F-35s took place in the USA]. trthaber.com (in Turkish). TRT Haber. 21 June 2018. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  466. Stone, Mike; Ali, Idrees (4 April 2019). "Turkish F-35 delivered to training base in Arizona, official says". Reuters. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  467. "Turkish F35 takes flight". YouTube (Video). Kaparzo1453. 23 May 2018. Archived from the original on 4 March 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  468. "Turkish Air Force pilots training with Turkish F-35As at Luke Air Force Base". YouTube (Video). Tonk298. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 4 March 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  469. Tirpak, John A. (20 July 2020). "USAF Nets Turkey's F-35s Under $861.7M Contract Mod". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023.
  470. "US ready to greenlight Turkey's F-35 fighter jet program if Ankara gives up Russian S-300s and S-400s". February 2024. Archived from the original on 2 February 2024. Retrieved 3 July 2024.
  471. "White House moves forward with sale of F-35s to UAE". Al Jazeera. 4 November 2020. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  472. "Biden suspends F-35 sale to UAE". Daily Sabah. 27 January 2021. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  473. Axelrod, Tal (13 April 2021). "Biden to move ahead with $23 billion UAE weapons sale approved by Trump". The Hill. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
  474. Ghantous, Ghaida; Ponnezhath, Maria; Stone, Mike; Ali, Idrees (14 December 2021). "UAE told the U.S. it will suspend talks on F-35 jets -Emirati official". Reuters. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
  475. Palowski, Jakub (15 December 2021). "Emiraty bez F-35? Porozumienie zerwane" [Emirates without F-35? Agreement broken]. defence24.pl (in Polish). Archived from the original on 10 October 2023.
  476. "UAE rules out reopening F-35 talks with US". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 18 September 2024.
  477. Marrow, Michael (5 June 2024). "What a crashed jet means for an F-35 program already thin on test planes". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  478. "An F-35 Went Down in New Mexico. It's Still One of the Safest Planes in the Skies". Popular Mechanics. 4 June 2024. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  479. Lockheed Martin. "F-35A Conventional Takeoff and Landing Variant". Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  480. "F-35A Lightning II". af.mil. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
  481. "F-35B Short Takeoff/Vertical Landing Variant". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  482. "F-35C Carrier Variant". Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  483. "F-35 Weaponry". F35.com. Lockheed Martin. Archived from the original on 18 April 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  484. "FY2016 DOT&E Report – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)" (PDF). dote.osd.mil. 2017. p. 15. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2017.
  485. "F-35A Lightning II". Royal Australian Air Force. Retrieved 14 November 2022.
  486. North, Gary (April 2016). "Long Combat Radius" (PDF). F-35: The Future is Now. Fisher.org.il. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2016. Retrieved 9 June 2016.
  487. "Air Force Developing AMRAAM Replacement to Counter China". 20 June 2019.
  488. Allison, George (21 February 2022). "Integration of Meteor missile on F-35B slips to 2027".
  489. ^ Hoyle2021-09-17T10:33:00+01:00, Craig. "Italy, UK to complete Meteor, Spear missile integration on F-35 fleets". FlightGlobal.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  490. Michael Marrow (25 Sep 2023) Northrop nabs $705M Air Force award for new F-35 air-to-ground missile IOC 2026
  491. Ewing, Philip (3 July 2012). "The Navy's advanced weapons shopping list". DoD buzz.com. Archived from the original on 6 September 2012. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
  492. "Update: JSM successfully released from F-35A". Janes.com. 12 April 2021.
  493. "Nuclear Posture Review Report" (PDF). U.S. Department of Defense. Washington, D.C. April 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 December 2014.
  494. "AN/APG-81 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Fire Control Radar". Northrop Grumman.
  495. "Northrop Grumman Developing the Next Generation Radar for the F-35 Lightning II". Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  496. "F-35 Electro Optical Targeting System (EOTS)". Lockheed Martin.
  497. "Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System | Raytheon Intelligence & Space". Archived from the original on 24 March 2023.
  498. BAE Systems (November 2018). "AN/ASQ-239 Electronic warfare/countermeasure system" (PDF). www.baesystems.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 May 2023. Retrieved 16 May 2023.

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Borgu, Aldo (2004). A Big Deal: Australia's Future Air Combat Capability. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute. ISBN 1-920722-25-4.
  • Spick, Mike (2002). The Illustrated Directory of Fighters. London: Salamander. ISBN 1-84065-384-1.
  • Winchester, Jim (2005). Concept Aircraft: Prototypes, X-Planes, and Experimental Aircraft. San Diego, CA: Thunder Bay Press. ISBN 978-1-59223-480-6. OCLC 636459025.

External links

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Development
JSF contenders
Manufacturer
Procurement
Operations
Engines
Equipment fitted
Lockheed and Lockheed Martin aircraft and spacecraft
Transports
Vega family
Electra family
Constellation family
C-130 Hercules family
L-188 Electra family
Other types
Fighter-bombers
Lightning family
Shooting Star family
Starfighter family
Raptor family
Other types
Reconnaissance
Blackbird family
Maritime patrol
Other crewed
UAVs
Trainers
Helicopters
Experimental
Light aircraft
Missiles
Engines
Model
numbers
Vega
Not assigned
USAAS/USAAC/USAAF/USAF fighter designations 1924–1962, and Tri-Service post-1962 systems
1924 sequences
(1924–1962)
Pursuit (1924–1948)
Fighter (1948–1962)
Pursuit, biplace
Fighter, multiplace
Non-sequential
Tri-service sequence
(1962–present)
Main sequence
Non-sequential
Covert designations
Related designations
Not assigned  • Unofficial  • Assigned to multiple types
See also: "F-19"  • 1919–1924 sequence
Italian Armed Forces aircraft designation system, 2009–present
1–100
101–200
201–400
401–2006
Countries producing stealth aircraft
Stealth technology
United
States
Experimental
Fighters
Attack
Bombers
UAVs
Programs
Australia
UAVs
China
Fighters
Bombers
Experimental
UAVs
Russia
Experimental
Fighters
Bombers
UAVs
United
Kingdom
Experimental
Fighters
UAVs
Japan
Experimental
Fighters
Italy
Fighters
UAVs
India
Fighters
UAVs
France
Fighters
UAVs
Spain
Fighters
UAVs
Germany
ExperimentalMBB Lampyridae
Fighters
UAVs
Sweden
Fighters
Turkey
Fighters
UAVs
South Korea
Fighters
Iran
Fighters
Categories: