Revision as of 19:02, 3 November 2010 editAlansohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers504,904 edits Reverted 2 edits by ClueBot NG and 41.215.64.186 to an older version by 41.215.64.186 (HG)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:43, 22 October 2024 edit undoMolecularPilot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,415 edits Reverting edit(s) by 202.152.138.82 (talk) to rev. 1250277434 by Dhrm77: Vandalism (UV 0.1.6)Tags: Ultraviolet Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Relationship between two numbers of the same kind}} | |||
{{Otheruses4|the mathematical concept|the Swedish institute|Ratio Institute|the academic journal|Ratio (journal)|the philosophical concept|Reason|the legal concept|Ratio decidendi}} | |||
{{other uses}} | |||
].]] | |||
{{redirect|is to|the grammatical construction|am to}} | |||
]]] | |||
In ], a '''ratio''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|r|eɪ|ʃ|(|i|)|oʊ}}) shows how many times one ] contains another. For example, if there are eight oranges and six lemons in a bowl of fruit, then the ratio of oranges to lemons is eight to six (that is, 8:6, which is equivalent to the ratio 4:3). Similarly, the ratio of lemons to oranges is 6:8 (or 3:4) and the ratio of oranges to the total amount of fruit is 8:14 (or 4:7). | |||
The numbers in a ratio may be quantities of any kind, such as counts of people or objects, or such as measurements of lengths, weights, time, etc. In most contexts, both numbers are restricted to be ]. | |||
In ], a '''ratio''' is a relationship between two numbers of the same kind<ref>Wentworth, p. 55</ref> (''i.e.'', objects, persons, students, spoonfuls, units of whatever identical dimension), usually expressed as ''"a'' to ''b"'' or a:b, sometimes expressed arithmetically as a dimensionless ] of the two,<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref> which explicitly indicates how many times the first number contains the second.<ref>Penny Cyclopedia, p. 307</ref> | |||
A ratio may be specified either by giving both constituting numbers, written as "''a'' to ''b''" or "''a:b''", or by giving just the value of their ] {{nowrap|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}.<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref>}}<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ratios|url=https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/ratio.html|access-date=2020-08-22|website=www.mathsisfun.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Stapel|first=Elizabeth|title=Ratios|url=https://www.purplemath.com/modules/ratio.htm|access-date=2020-08-22|website=Purplemath}}</ref> Equal quotients correspond to equal ratios. | |||
==Notation and terminology== | |||
A statement expressing the equality of two ratios is called a '''''proportion'''''. | |||
Consequently, a ratio may be considered as an ordered pair of numbers, a ] with the first number in the numerator and the second in the denominator, or as the value denoted by this fraction. Ratios of counts, given by (non-zero) ]s, are ]s, and may sometimes be natural numbers. | |||
A more specific definition adopted in ] (especially in ]) for ''ratio'' is the ] quotient between two ] measured with the same ].<ref name="ISO 80000-1">{{cite web | title=ISO 80000-1:2022(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General | website=iso.org | url=https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:80000:-1:ed-2:v1:en | ref={{sfnref | iso.org}} | access-date=2023-07-23}}</ref> A quotient of two quantities that are measured with {{em|different}} units may be called a ].<ref>''"The quotient of two numbers (or quantities); the relative sizes of two numbers (or quantities)"'', "The Mathematics Dictionary" </ref> | |||
== Notation and terminology == | |||
The ratio of numbers ''A'' and ''B'' can be expressed as:<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref> | The ratio of numbers ''A'' and ''B'' can be expressed as:<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref> | ||
*the ratio of ''A'' to ''B'' | *the ratio of ''A'' to ''B'' | ||
*''A |
*''A:B'' | ||
*''A'' is to ''B'' (when followed by "as ''C'' is to ''D''{{hair space}}"; see below) | |||
*''A'':''B'' | |||
*a ] with ''A'' as numerator and ''B'' as denominator that represents the quotient (i.e., ''A'' divided by ''B, or'' <math>\tfrac{A}{B}</math>). This can be expressed as a simple or a decimal fraction, or as a percentage, etc.<ref>Decimal fractions are frequently used in technological areas where ratio comparisons are important, such as aspect ratios (imaging), compression ratios (engines or data storage), etc.</ref> | |||
When a ratio is written in the form ''A'':''B'', the two-dot character is sometimes the ] punctuation mark.<ref name="MathWorld-colon">{{cite web |url=https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Colon.html |title=Colon |last=Weisstein |first=Eric W. |author-link=Eric W. Weisstein |website=] |date=2022-11-04 |access-date=2022-11-26 }}</ref> In ], this is {{unichar|3a|colon}}, although Unicode also provides a dedicated ratio character, {{unichar|2236|ratio}}.<ref name="Unicode">{{cite web |url=https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf |publisher=Unicode, Inc. |website=The Unicode Standard, Version 15.0 |title=ASCII Punctuation |date=2022 |access-date=2022-11-26 |quote= also used to denote division or scale; for that mathematical use 2236 {{not a typo|∶}} is preferred }}</ref> | |||
The numbers ''A'' and ''B'' are sometimes called ''terms of the ratio'', with ''A'' being the '']'' and ''B'' being the '']''.<ref></ref> | |||
A statement expressing the equality of two ratios ''A'':''B'' and ''C'':''D'' is called a '''proportion''',<ref>Heath, p. 126</ref> written as ''A'':''B'' = ''C'':''D'' or ''A'':''B''∷''C'':''D''. This latter form, when spoken or written in the English language, is often expressed as | |||
:(''A'' is to ''B'') as (''C'' is to ''D''). | |||
''A'', ''B'', ''C'' and ''D'' are called the terms of the proportion. ''A'' and ''D'' are called its ''extremes'', and ''B'' and ''C'' are called its ''means''. The equality of three or more ratios, like ''A'':''B'' = ''C'':''D'' = ''E'':''F'', is called a '''continued proportion'''.<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref> | |||
Ratios are sometimes used with three or even more terms, e.g., the proportion for the edge lengths of a "]" that is ten inches long is therefore | |||
:<math>\text{thickness : width : length } = 2:4:10;</math> | |||
:(unplaned measurements; the first two numbers are reduced slightly when the wood is planed smooth) | |||
a good concrete mix (in volume units) is sometimes quoted as | |||
The numbers ''A'' and ''B'' are sometimes called '''terms''' with ''A'' being the '''antecedent''' and ''B'' being the '''consequent'''. | |||
:<math>\text{cement : sand : gravel } = 1:2:4.</math><ref></ref> | |||
<!-- (Can't find a source for this but leave in as comment for now since it seems plausible.) | |||
The most common examples involve two numbers, but any number of numbers can be compared. --> | |||
For a (rather dry) mixture of 4/1 parts in volume of cement to water, it could be said that the ratio of cement to water is 4:1, that there is 4 times as much cement as water, or that there is a quarter (1/4) as much water as cement. | |||
The proportion expressing the equality of the ratios ''A'':''B'' and ''C'':''D'' is written | |||
''A'':''B''=''C'':''D'' or ''A'':''B''::''C'':''D''. this latter form, when spoken or written in the English language, is often expressed as | |||
:''A'' '''is to''' ''B'' '''as''' ''C'' '''is to''' ''D''. | |||
The meaning of such a proportion of ratios with more than two terms is that the ratio of any two terms on the left-hand side is equal to the ratio of the corresponding two terms on the right-hand side. | |||
Again, ''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'' are called the terms of the proportion. ''A'' and ''D'' are called the '''extremes''', and ''B'' and ''C'' are called the '''means'''. The equality of three or more proportions is called a continued proportion.<ref>New International Encyclopedia</ref> | |||
==History and etymology== | ==History and etymology== | ||
It is possible to trace the origin of the word "ratio" to the ] {{lang|grc|λόγος}} ('']''). Early translators rendered this into ] as ''{{lang|la|]}}'' ("reason"; as in the word "rational"). A more modern interpretation of Euclid's meaning is more akin to computation or reckoning.<ref>Penny Cyclopædia, p. 307</ref> Medieval writers used the word ''{{lang|la|proportio}}'' ("proportion") to indicate ratio and ''{{lang|la|proportionalitas}}'' ("proportionality") for the equality of ratios.<ref>Smith, p. 478</ref> | |||
{{wiktionary}} | |||
It would be impossible to trace the origin of the concept of ratio since the ideas from which it developed would have been familiar to preliterate cultures. For example the idea of one village being twice as large as another or a distance being half that of another are so basic that they would have been understood in prehistoric society.<ref>Smith, p. 477</ref> However, it is possible to trace the origin of the word ''ratio'' to the ] λόγος (]). Early translators rendered this into ] as ''ratio'', meaning "reason" (as in "rational"). (A rational number may be expressed as the quotient of two integers.) A more modern interpretation of Euclid's meaning is more akin to computation or reckoning.<ref>Penny Cyclopedia, p. 307</ref> Medieval writers used the word ''proportio'' ("proportion") to indicate ratio and ''proportionalitas'' ("proportionality") for the equality of ratios.<ref>Smith, p. 478</ref> | |||
Euclid collected the results appearing the Elements from earlier sources. The ] developed a theory of ratio and proportion as applied to numbers.<ref>Heath, p. 112</ref> The Pythagoreans' conception of number included only what would today be called rational numbers, casting doubt on the validity of the theory in geometry where, as the Pythagoreans also discovered, incommensurable ratios (corresponding to irrational numbers) exist. The discovery of a theory of ratios that does not assume commensurability is probably due to ]. The exposition of the theory of proportions that appears in Book VII of The Elements reflects the earlier theory of ratios of commensurables.<ref>Heath, p. 113</ref> | Euclid collected the results appearing in the Elements from earlier sources. The ] developed a theory of ratio and proportion as applied to numbers.<ref>Heath, p. 112</ref> The Pythagoreans' conception of number included only what would today be called rational numbers, casting doubt on the validity of the theory in geometry where, as the Pythagoreans also discovered, incommensurable ratios (corresponding to ]) exist. The discovery of a theory of ratios that does not assume commensurability is probably due to ]. The exposition of the theory of proportions that appears in Book VII of The Elements reflects the earlier theory of ratios of commensurables.<ref>Heath, p. 113</ref> | ||
The existence of multiple theories seems unnecessarily complex |
The existence of multiple theories seems unnecessarily complex since ratios are, to a large extent, identified with quotients and their prospective values. However, this is a comparatively recent development, as can be seen from the fact that modern geometry textbooks still use distinct terminology and notation for ratios and quotients. The reasons for this are twofold: first, there was the previously mentioned reluctance to accept irrational numbers as true numbers, and second, the lack of a widely used symbolism to replace the already established terminology of ratios delayed the full acceptance of fractions as alternative until the 16th century.<ref>Smith, p. 480</ref> | ||
===Euclid's definitions=== | ===Euclid's definitions=== | ||
Book V of ] has 18 definitions, all of which relate to ratios.<ref>Heath, reference for section</ref> In addition, Euclid uses ideas that were in such common usage that he did not include definitions for them. The first two definitions say that a |
Book V of ] has 18 definitions, all of which relate to ratios.<ref>Heath, reference for section</ref> In addition, Euclid uses ideas that were in such common usage that he did not include definitions for them. The first two definitions say that a ''part'' of a quantity is another quantity that "measures" it and conversely, a ''multiple'' of a quantity is another quantity that it measures. In modern terminology, this means that a multiple of a quantity is that quantity multiplied by an integer greater than one—and a part of a quantity (meaning ]) is a part that, when multiplied by an integer greater than one, gives the quantity. | ||
Euclid does not define the term "measure" as used here, However, one may infer that if a quantity is taken as a unit of measurement, and a second quantity is given as an integral number of these units, then the first quantity ''measures'' the second. These definitions are repeated, nearly word for word, as definitions 3 and 5 in book VII. | |||
Definition 3 describes what a ratio is in a general way. It is not rigorous in a mathematical sense and some have ascribed it to Euclid's editors rather than Euclid himself.<ref>"Geometry, Euclidean" '']'' p682.</ref> Euclid defines a ratio to be between two quantities ''of the same type'', so by this definition the ratios of two lengths or of two areas are defined, but not the ratio of a length and an area. Definition 4 makes this more rigorous. It states that a ratio of two quantities exists when there is a multiple of each which exceeds the other. In modern notation, a ratio exists between quantities ''p'' and ''q'' if there exist integers ''m'' and ''n'' so that ''mp''>''q'' and ''nq''>''m''. This condition is known as the ]. | |||
Definition 3 describes what a ratio is in a general way. It is not rigorous in a mathematical sense and some have ascribed it to Euclid's editors rather than Euclid himself.<ref>"Geometry, Euclidean" '']'' p682.</ref> Euclid defines a ratio as between two quantities ''of the same type'', so by this definition the ratios of two lengths or of two areas are defined, but not the ratio of a length and an area. Definition 4 makes this more rigorous. It states that a ratio of two quantities exists, when there is a multiple of each that exceeds the other. In modern notation, a ratio exists between quantities ''p'' and ''q'', if there exist integers ''m'' and ''n'' such that ''mp''>''q'' and ''nq''>''p''. This condition is known as the ]. | |||
Definition 5 is the most complex and difficult; it defines what it means for two ratios to be equal. Today, this can be done by simply stating that ratios are equal when the quotients of the terms are equal, but Euclid did not accept the existence of the quotients of incommensurables, so such a definition would have been meaningless to him. Thus, a more subtle definition is needed where quantities involved are not measured directly to one another. Though it may not be possible to assign a rational value to a ratio, it is possible to compare a ratio with a rational number. Specifically, given two quantities, ''p'' and ''q'', and a rational number ''m''/''n'' we can say that the ratio of ''p'' to ''q'' is less than, equal to, or greater than ''m''/''n'' when ''np'' is less than, equal to, or greater than ''mq'' respectively. Euclid's definition of equality can be stated as that two ratios are equal when they behave identically with respect to being less than, equal to, or greater than any rational number. In modern notation this says that given quantities ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'', then ''p'':''q''::''r'':''s'' if for any positive integers ''m'' and ''n'', ''np''<''mq'', ''np''=''mq'', ''np''>''mq'' according as ''nr''<''ms'', ''nr''=''ms'', ''nr''>''ms'' respectively. There is a remarkable similarity between this definition and the theory of ]s used in the modern definition of irrational numbers.<ref>Heath p. 125</ref> | |||
Definition 5 is the most complex and difficult. It defines what it means for two ratios to be equal. Today, this can be done by simply stating that ratios are equal when the quotients of the terms are equal, but such a definition would have been meaningless to Euclid. In modern notation, Euclid's definition of equality is that given quantities ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'', ''p'':''q''∷''r''{{hair space}}:''s'' if and only if, for any positive integers ''m'' and ''n'', ''np''<''mq'', ''np''=''mq'', or ''np''>''mq'' according as ''nr''<''ms'', ''nr''=''ms'', or ''nr''>''ms'', respectively.<ref>Heath p.114</ref> This definition has affinities with ] as, with ''n'' and ''q'' both positive, ''np'' stands to ''mq'' as {{sfrac|''p''|''q''}} stands to the rational number {{sfrac|''m''|''n''}} (dividing both terms by ''nq'').<ref>Heath p. 125</ref> | |||
Definition 6 says that quantities that have the same ratio are '''proportional''' or '''in proportion'''. Euclid uses the Greek ἀναλόγον (analogon), this has the same root as λόγος and is related to the English word "analog". | |||
Definition 6 says that quantities that have the same ratio are ''proportional'' or ''in proportion''. Euclid uses the Greek ἀναλόγον (analogon), this has the same root as λόγος and is related to the English word "analog". | |||
Definition 7 defines what it means for one ratio to be less than or greater than another and is based on the ideas present in definition 5. In modern notation it says that given quantities ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'', then ''p'':''q''>''r'':''s'' if there are positive integers ''m'' and ''n'' so that ''np''>''mq'' and ''nr''≤''ms''. | |||
Definition 7 defines what it means for one ratio to be less than or greater than another and is based on the ideas present in definition 5. In modern notation it says that given quantities ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'', ''p'':''q''>''r'':''s'' if there are positive integers ''m'' and ''n'' so that ''np''>''mq'' and ''nr''≤''ms''. | |||
As with definition 3, definition 8 is regarded by some as being a later insertion by Euclid's editors. It defines three terms ''p'', ''q'' and ''r'' to be in proportion when ''p'':''q''::''q'':''r''. This is extended to 4 terms ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'' as ''p'':''q''::''q'':''r''::''r'':''s'', and so on. Sequences which have the property that the ratios of consecutive terms are equal are called ]s. Definitions 9 and 10 apply this, saying that if ''p'', ''q'' and ''r'' are in proportion then ''p'':''r'' is the '''duplicate ratio''' of ''p'':''q'' and ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'' are in proportion then ''p'':''s'' is the '''triplicate ratio''' of ''p'':''q''. If ''p'', ''q'' and ''r'' are in proportion then ''q'' is called a '''mean proportional''' to ''p'' and ''r''. Similarly, if ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'' are in proportion then ''q'' and ''r'' are called two mean proportionals to ''p'' and ''s''. | |||
{{anchor|EuclidDef8}}As with definition 3, definition 8 is regarded by some as being a later insertion by Euclid's editors. It defines three terms ''p'', ''q'' and ''r'' to be in proportion when ''p'':''q''∷''q'':''r''. This is extended to four terms ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'' as ''p'':''q''∷''q'':''r''∷''r'':''s'', and so on. Sequences that have the property that the ratios of consecutive terms are equal are called ]s. Definitions 9 and 10 apply this, saying that if ''p'', ''q'' and ''r'' are in proportion then ''p'':''r'' is the ''duplicate ratio'' of ''p'':''q'' and if ''p'', ''q'', ''r'' and ''s'' are in proportion then ''p'':''s'' is the ''triplicate ratio'' of ''p'':''q''. | |||
==Number of terms and use of fractions== | |||
==Examples== | |||
In general, a comparison of the quantities of a two-entity ratio can be expressed as a ] derived from the ratio. For example, in a ratio of 2:3, the amount, size, volume, or quantity of the first entity is <math>\tfrac{2}{3}</math> that of the second entity. | |||
The quantities being compared in a ratio might be physical quantities such as speed, or may simply refer to amounts of particular objects. A common example of the latter case is the weight ratio of ] used in concrete, which is commonly stated as 1:4. This means that the weight of cement used is four times the weight of water used. It does not say anything about the total amounts of cement and water used, nor the amount of concrete being made. | |||
If there are 2 oranges and 3 apples, the ratio of oranges to apples is 2:3, and the ratio of oranges to the total number of pieces of fruit is 2:5. These ratios can also be expressed in fraction form: there are 2/3 as many oranges as apples, and 2/5 of the pieces of fruit are oranges. If orange juice concentrate is to be diluted with water in the ratio 1:4, then one part of concentrate is mixed with four parts of water, giving five parts total; the amount of orange juice concentrate is 1/4 the amount of water, while the amount of orange juice concentrate is 1/5 of the total liquid. In both ratios and fractions, it is important to be clear what is being compared to what, and beginners often make mistakes for this reason. | |||
Older televisions have a 4:3 ratio which means that the height is 3/4 of the width. Widescreen TVs have a 16:9 ratio which means that the width is nearly double the height. | |||
Fractions can also be inferred from ratios with more than two entities; however, a ratio with more than two entities cannot be completely converted into a single fraction, because a fraction can only compare two quantities. A separate fraction can be used to compare the quantities of any two of the entities covered by the ratio: for example, from a ratio of 2:3:7 we can infer that the quantity of the second entity is <math>\tfrac{3}{7}</math> that of the third entity. | |||
===Fraction=== | |||
{{main|Fraction (mathematics)}} | |||
If there are 2 oranges and 3 apples, the ratio of oranges to apples is shown as 2:3, whereas the fraction of oranges to total fruit is 2/5. | |||
==Proportions and percentage ratios{{anchor|Proportions|Percentage ratios}}== | |||
If concentrated orange is to be diluted with water in the ratio 1:4, then one part of orange is mixed with four parts of water, giving five parts total, so the fraction of orange is 1/5 and the fraction of water is 4/5. | |||
If we multiply all quantities involved in a ratio by the same number, the ratio remains valid. For example, a ratio of 3:2 is the same as 12:8. It is usual either to reduce terms to the ], or to express them in parts per hundred (]). | |||
If a mixture contains substances A, B, C and D in the ratio 5:9:4:2 then there are 5 parts of A for every 9 parts of B, 4 parts of C and 2 parts of D. As 5+9+4+2=20, the total mixture contains 5/20 of A (5 parts out of 20), 9/20 of B, 4/20 of C, and 2/20 of D. If we divide all numbers by the total and multiply by 100, we have converted to ]: 25% A, 45% B, 20% C, and 10% D (equivalent to writing the ratio as 25:45:20:10). | |||
==Number of terms== | |||
In general, a ratio of 2:3 means that the amount of the first quantity is <math>\tfrac{2}{3}</math> (two thirds) of the amount of the second quantity. This pattern works with ratios with more than two terms. However, a ratio with more than two terms cannot be completely converted into a single fraction; a single fraction represents only one part of the ratio. If the ratio deals with objects or amounts of objects, this is often expressed as "for every two parts of the first quantity there are three parts of the second quantity". | |||
If the two or more ratio quantities encompass all of the quantities in a particular situation, it is said that "the whole" contains the sum of the parts: for example, a fruit basket containing two apples and three oranges and no other fruit is made up of two parts apples and three parts oranges. In this case, <math>\tfrac{2}{5}</math>, or 40% of the whole is apples and <math>\tfrac{3}{5}</math>, or 60% of the whole is oranges. This comparison of a specific quantity to "the whole" is called a proportion. | |||
If a mixture contains substances A, B, C & D in the ratio 5:9:4:2 then there are 5 parts of A for every 9 parts of B, 4 parts of C and 2 parts of D. This means that the total mixture contains 5/20 of A, 9/20 of B, 4/20 of C, and 2/20 of D. In terms of percentages, this is 25% A, 45% B, 20% C, and 10% D. ''(The ratio could have been written as 25:45:20:10 but this can be cancelled to the simplest form given above.)'' | |||
If the ratio consists of only two values, it can be represented as a fraction, in particular as a decimal fraction. For example, older ]s have a 4:3 '']'', which means that the width is 4/3 of the height (this can also be expressed as 1.33:1 or just 1.33 rounded to two decimal places). More recent widescreen TVs have a 16:9 aspect ratio, or 1.78 rounded to two decimal places. One of the popular widescreen movie formats is 2.35:1 or simply 2.35. Representing ratios as decimal fractions simplifies their comparison. When comparing 1.33, 1.78 and 2.35, it is obvious which format offers wider image. Such a comparison works only when values being compared are consistent, like always expressing width in relation to height. | |||
==Proportions== | |||
If the two or more ratio quantities encompass all of the quantities in a particular situation, for example two apples and three oranges in a fruit basket containing no other types of fruit, it could be said that "the whole" contains five parts, made up of two parts apples and three parts oranges. In this case, <math>\tfrac{2}{5}</math>, or 40% of the whole are apples and <math>\tfrac{3}{5}</math>, or 60% of the whole are oranges. This comparison of a specific quantity to "the whole" is sometimes called a proportion. Proportions are sometimes expressed as ] as demonstrated above. | |||
==Reduction== | ==Reduction== | ||
Ratios can be ] (as fractions are) by dividing each quantity by the common factors of all the quantities. As for fractions, the simplest form is considered that in which the numbers in the ratio are the smallest possible integers. | |||
{{main|Reduction (mathematics)}} | |||
Note that ratios can be ] (as fractions are) by dividing each quantity by the common factors of all the quantities. This is often called "cancelling." As for fractions, the simplest form is considered to be that in which the numbers in the ratio are the smallest possible integers. | |||
Thus the ratio |
Thus, the ratio 40:60 is equivalent in meaning to the ratio 2:3, the latter being obtained from the former by dividing both quantities by 20. Mathematically, we write 40:60 = 2:3, or equivalently 40:60∷2:3. The verbal equivalent is "40 is to 60 as 2 is to 3." | ||
Mathematically, we write: "<math>\ 40:60</math>" <math>\ = </math> "<math>\ 2:3</math>" ''(dividing both quantities by 20). | |||
:Grammatically, we would say, "40 to 60 equals 2 to 3." | |||
A ratio that has integers for both quantities and that cannot be reduced any further (using integers) is said to be in ] or lowest terms. | |||
An alternative representation is: "40:60::2:3" | |||
:Grammatically, we would say, "40 is to 60 as 2 is to 3." | |||
Sometimes it is useful to write a ratio in the form 1:''x'' or ''x'':1, where ''x'' is not necessarily an integer, to enable comparisons of different ratios. For example, the ratio 4:5 can be written as 1:1.25 (dividing both sides by 4) Alternatively, it can be written as 0.8:1 (dividing both sides by 5). | |||
A ratio that has integers for both quantities and that cannot be reduced any further (using integers) is said to be in '''simplest form''' or '''lowest terms'''. | |||
Where the context makes the meaning clear, a ratio in this form is sometimes written without the 1 and the ratio symbol (:), though, mathematically, this makes it a ] or ]. | |||
Sometimes it is useful to write a ratio in the form <math>\ 1:n </math> or <math>\ n:1</math> to enable comparisons of different ratios. | |||
==Irrational ratios== | |||
For example, the ratio <math>\ 4:5</math> can be written as <math>\ 1:1.25</math> '' (dividing both sides by 4)'' | |||
Ratios may also be established between ] quantities (quantities whose ratio, as value of a fraction, amounts to an ]). The earliest discovered example, found by the ], is the ratio of the length of the diagonal {{mvar|d}} to the length of a side {{mvar|s}} of a ], which is the ], formally <math>a:d = 1:\sqrt{2}.</math> Another example is the ratio of a ]'s circumference to its diameter, which is called ], and is not just an ], but a ]. | |||
Also well known is the ] of two (mostly) lengths {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}}, which is defined by the proportion | |||
Alternatively, <math>\ 4:5</math> can be written as <math>\ 0.8:1</math> '' (dividing both sides by 5)'' | |||
: <math>a:b = (a+b):a \quad</math> or, equivalently <math>\quad a:b = (1+b/a):1.</math> | |||
Taking the ratios as fractions and <math>a:b</math> as having the value {{mvar|x}}, yields the equation | |||
:<math>x=1+\tfrac 1x \quad</math> or <math>\quad x^2-x-1 = 0,</math> | |||
which has the positive, irrational solution <math>x=\tfrac{a}{b}=\tfrac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}.</math> | |||
Thus at least one of ''a'' and ''b'' has to be irrational for them to be in the golden ratio. An example of an occurrence of the golden ratio in math is as the limiting value of the ratio of two consecutive ]s: even though all these ratios are ratios of two integers and hence are rational, the limit of the sequence of these rational ratios is the irrational golden ratio. | |||
Similarly, the ] of {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} is defined by the proportion | |||
Where the context makes the meaning clear, a ratio in this form is sometimes written without the 1 and the colon, though, mathematically, this makes it a ] or ]. | |||
:<math>a:b = (2a+b):a \quad (= (2+b/a):1),</math> corresponding to <math>x^2-2x-1 = 0.</math> | |||
This equation has the positive, irrational solution <math>x = \tfrac{a}{b}=1+\sqrt{2},</math> so again at least one of the two quantities ''a'' and ''b'' in the silver ratio must be irrational. | |||
==Odds== | |||
===Dilution ratio=== | |||
{{Main|Odds}} | |||
Ratios are often used for simple dilutions applied in chemistry and biology. A simple dilution is one in which a unit volume of a liquid material of interest is combined with an appropriate volume of a solvent liquid to achieve the desired concentration. The dilution factor is the total number of unit volumes in which your material will be dissolved. The diluted material must then be thoroughly mixed to achieve the true dilution. For example, a 1:5 dilution (verbalize as "1 to 5" dilution) entails combining 1 unit volume of solute (the material to be diluted) + 4 unit volumes ''(approximately)'' of the solvent to give 5 units of the total volume. (''Some solutions and mixtures take up slightly less volume than their components.'') | |||
''Odds'' (as in gambling) are expressed as a ratio. For example, odds of "7 to 3 against" (7:3) mean that there are seven chances that the event will not happen to every three chances that it will happen. The probability of success is 30%. In every ten trials, there are expected to be three wins and seven losses. | |||
The dilution factor is frequently expressed using exponents: 1:5 would be '''5e−1''' ''(5<sup>−1</sup> i.e. one-fifth:one)''; 1:100 would be '''10e−2''' ''(10<sup>−2</sup> i.e. one hundredth:one)'', and so on. | |||
==Units== | |||
There is often confusion between dilution ratio ('''1:n''' meaning '''1''' part solute to '''n''' parts solvent) and dilution factor ('''1:n+1''') where the second number represents the '''total''' volume of solute + solvent. In scientific and serial dilutions, the given ratio (or factor) often means the ratio to the final volume, not to just the solvent. The factors then can easily be multiplied to give an overall dilution factor. | |||
Ratios may be ], as in the case they relate quantities in units of the same ], even if their ] are initially different. | |||
For example, the ratio {{nowrap|one minute : 40 seconds}} can be reduced by changing the first value to 60 seconds, so the ratio becomes {{nowrap|60 seconds : 40 seconds}}. Once the units are the same, they can be omitted, and the ratio can be reduced to 3:2. | |||
On the other hand, there are non-dimensionless quotients, also known as ] (sometimes also as ratios).<ref>{{cite book |quote="Velocity" can be defined as the ratio... "Population density" is the ratio... "Gasoline consumption" is measure as the ratio... |title=Ratio and Proportion: Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers |year=2012 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eawKLY71xvkC&q=perspective&pg=PA25 |author1=David Ben-Chaim |author2=Yaffa Keret |author3=Bat-Sheva Ilany|isbn=9789460917844 }}</ref><ref>''"''Ratio as a Rate''. The first type defined by ], above, is known as rate, and illustrates a comparison between two variables with difference units. (...) A ratio of this sort produces a unique, new concept with its own entity, and this new concept is usually not considered a ratio, per se, but a rate or density."'', "Ratio and Proportion: Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers" </ref> | |||
In other areas of science such as pharmacy, and in non-scientific usage, a dilution is normally given as a plain ratio of solvent to solute. | |||
In chemistry, ] ratios are usually expressed as weight/volume fractions. | |||
by SHARMAKE SAID 2001 E H S | |||
For example, a concentration of 3% w/v usually means 3 g of substance in every 100 mL of solution. This cannot be converted to a dimensionless ratio, as in weight/weight or volume/volume fractions. | |||
==Triangular coordinates== | |||
==Odds== | |||
{{main|Odds}} | |||
'''Odds''' (as in gambling) are expressed as a ratio. For example, odds of "7 to 3 against" ('''7:3''') mean that there are seven chances that the event will not happen to every three chances that it will happen. | |||
The locations of points relative to a triangle with ] ''A'', ''B'', and ''C'' and sides ''AB'', ''BC'', and ''CA'' are often expressed in extended ratio form as ''triangular coordinates''. | |||
==Different units== | |||
Ratios are ] when they relate quantities which have the same or related ]. | |||
In ], a point with coordinates ''α, β, γ'' is the point upon which a weightless sheet of metal in the shape and size of the triangle would exactly balance if weights were put on the vertices, with the ratio of the weights at ''A'' and ''B'' being ''α'' : ''β'', the ratio of the weights at ''B'' and ''C'' being ''β'' : ''γ'', and therefore the ratio of weights at ''A'' and ''C'' being ''α'' : ''γ''. | |||
For example, the ratio '''1 minute : 40 seconds''' can be reduced by changing the first value to 60 seconds. Once the units are the same, they can be omitted, and the ratio can be reduced to '''3:2'''. | |||
In ], a point with coordinates ''x''{{hair space}}:''y''{{hair space}}:''z'' has ] distances to side ''BC'' (across from vertex ''A'') and side ''CA'' (across from vertex ''B'') in the ratio ''x''{{hair space}}:''y'', distances to side ''CA'' and side ''AB'' (across from ''C'') in the ratio ''y''{{hair space}}:''z'', and therefore distances to sides ''BC'' and ''AB'' in the ratio ''x''{{hair space}}:''z''. | |||
Since all information is expressed in terms of ratios (the individual numbers denoted by ''α, β, γ, x, y,'' and ''z'' have no meaning by themselves), a triangle analysis using barycentric or trilinear coordinates applies regardless of the size of the triangle. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== |
==References== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
<references/> | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
*, The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (1841) Charles Knight and Co., London pp. 307ff | *, The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (1841) Charles Knight and Co., London pp. 307ff | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
*{{cite book |title= The thirteen books of Euclid's Elements, vol 2 | *{{cite book |title= The thirteen books of Euclid's Elements, vol 2 | ||
|year= 1908 | |||
|others= trans. Sir Thomas Little Heath (1908) |publisher= Cambridge Univ. Press|pages=112ff| url=http://books.google.com/books?id=lxkPAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA2-PA112}} | |||
|others= trans. Sir Thomas Little Heath (1908) |publisher= Cambridge Univ. Press|pages=112ff| url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_lxkPAAAAIAAJ}} | |||
*D.E. Smith, ''History of Mathematics, vol 2'' Dover (1958) pp. 477ff | |||
*D.E. Smith, ''History of Mathematics, vol 2'' Ginn and Company (1925) pp. 477ff. Reprinted 1958 by Dover Publications. | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Wiktionary}} | |||
{{Fractions and ratios}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 05:43, 22 October 2024
Relationship between two numbers of the same kind For other uses, see Ratio (disambiguation). "is to" redirects here. For the grammatical construction, see am to.In mathematics, a ratio (/ˈreɪʃ(i)oʊ/) shows how many times one number contains another. For example, if there are eight oranges and six lemons in a bowl of fruit, then the ratio of oranges to lemons is eight to six (that is, 8:6, which is equivalent to the ratio 4:3). Similarly, the ratio of lemons to oranges is 6:8 (or 3:4) and the ratio of oranges to the total amount of fruit is 8:14 (or 4:7).
The numbers in a ratio may be quantities of any kind, such as counts of people or objects, or such as measurements of lengths, weights, time, etc. In most contexts, both numbers are restricted to be positive.
A ratio may be specified either by giving both constituting numbers, written as "a to b" or "a:b", or by giving just the value of their quotient a/b. Equal quotients correspond to equal ratios. A statement expressing the equality of two ratios is called a proportion.
Consequently, a ratio may be considered as an ordered pair of numbers, a fraction with the first number in the numerator and the second in the denominator, or as the value denoted by this fraction. Ratios of counts, given by (non-zero) natural numbers, are rational numbers, and may sometimes be natural numbers.
A more specific definition adopted in physical sciences (especially in metrology) for ratio is the dimensionless quotient between two physical quantities measured with the same unit. A quotient of two quantities that are measured with different units may be called a rate.
Notation and terminology
The ratio of numbers A and B can be expressed as:
- the ratio of A to B
- A:B
- A is to B (when followed by "as C is to D "; see below)
- a fraction with A as numerator and B as denominator that represents the quotient (i.e., A divided by B, or ). This can be expressed as a simple or a decimal fraction, or as a percentage, etc.
When a ratio is written in the form A:B, the two-dot character is sometimes the colon punctuation mark. In Unicode, this is U+003A : COLON, although Unicode also provides a dedicated ratio character, U+2236 ∶ RATIO.
The numbers A and B are sometimes called terms of the ratio, with A being the antecedent and B being the consequent.
A statement expressing the equality of two ratios A:B and C:D is called a proportion, written as A:B = C:D or A:B∷C:D. This latter form, when spoken or written in the English language, is often expressed as
- (A is to B) as (C is to D).
A, B, C and D are called the terms of the proportion. A and D are called its extremes, and B and C are called its means. The equality of three or more ratios, like A:B = C:D = E:F, is called a continued proportion.
Ratios are sometimes used with three or even more terms, e.g., the proportion for the edge lengths of a "two by four" that is ten inches long is therefore
- (unplaned measurements; the first two numbers are reduced slightly when the wood is planed smooth)
a good concrete mix (in volume units) is sometimes quoted as
For a (rather dry) mixture of 4/1 parts in volume of cement to water, it could be said that the ratio of cement to water is 4:1, that there is 4 times as much cement as water, or that there is a quarter (1/4) as much water as cement.
The meaning of such a proportion of ratios with more than two terms is that the ratio of any two terms on the left-hand side is equal to the ratio of the corresponding two terms on the right-hand side.
History and etymology
It is possible to trace the origin of the word "ratio" to the Ancient Greek λόγος (logos). Early translators rendered this into Latin as ratio ("reason"; as in the word "rational"). A more modern interpretation of Euclid's meaning is more akin to computation or reckoning. Medieval writers used the word proportio ("proportion") to indicate ratio and proportionalitas ("proportionality") for the equality of ratios.
Euclid collected the results appearing in the Elements from earlier sources. The Pythagoreans developed a theory of ratio and proportion as applied to numbers. The Pythagoreans' conception of number included only what would today be called rational numbers, casting doubt on the validity of the theory in geometry where, as the Pythagoreans also discovered, incommensurable ratios (corresponding to irrational numbers) exist. The discovery of a theory of ratios that does not assume commensurability is probably due to Eudoxus of Cnidus. The exposition of the theory of proportions that appears in Book VII of The Elements reflects the earlier theory of ratios of commensurables.
The existence of multiple theories seems unnecessarily complex since ratios are, to a large extent, identified with quotients and their prospective values. However, this is a comparatively recent development, as can be seen from the fact that modern geometry textbooks still use distinct terminology and notation for ratios and quotients. The reasons for this are twofold: first, there was the previously mentioned reluctance to accept irrational numbers as true numbers, and second, the lack of a widely used symbolism to replace the already established terminology of ratios delayed the full acceptance of fractions as alternative until the 16th century.
Euclid's definitions
Book V of Euclid's Elements has 18 definitions, all of which relate to ratios. In addition, Euclid uses ideas that were in such common usage that he did not include definitions for them. The first two definitions say that a part of a quantity is another quantity that "measures" it and conversely, a multiple of a quantity is another quantity that it measures. In modern terminology, this means that a multiple of a quantity is that quantity multiplied by an integer greater than one—and a part of a quantity (meaning aliquot part) is a part that, when multiplied by an integer greater than one, gives the quantity.
Euclid does not define the term "measure" as used here, However, one may infer that if a quantity is taken as a unit of measurement, and a second quantity is given as an integral number of these units, then the first quantity measures the second. These definitions are repeated, nearly word for word, as definitions 3 and 5 in book VII.
Definition 3 describes what a ratio is in a general way. It is not rigorous in a mathematical sense and some have ascribed it to Euclid's editors rather than Euclid himself. Euclid defines a ratio as between two quantities of the same type, so by this definition the ratios of two lengths or of two areas are defined, but not the ratio of a length and an area. Definition 4 makes this more rigorous. It states that a ratio of two quantities exists, when there is a multiple of each that exceeds the other. In modern notation, a ratio exists between quantities p and q, if there exist integers m and n such that mp>q and nq>p. This condition is known as the Archimedes property.
Definition 5 is the most complex and difficult. It defines what it means for two ratios to be equal. Today, this can be done by simply stating that ratios are equal when the quotients of the terms are equal, but such a definition would have been meaningless to Euclid. In modern notation, Euclid's definition of equality is that given quantities p, q, r and s, p:q∷r :s if and only if, for any positive integers m and n, np<mq, np=mq, or np>mq according as nr<ms, nr=ms, or nr>ms, respectively. This definition has affinities with Dedekind cuts as, with n and q both positive, np stands to mq as p/q stands to the rational number m/n (dividing both terms by nq).
Definition 6 says that quantities that have the same ratio are proportional or in proportion. Euclid uses the Greek ἀναλόγον (analogon), this has the same root as λόγος and is related to the English word "analog".
Definition 7 defines what it means for one ratio to be less than or greater than another and is based on the ideas present in definition 5. In modern notation it says that given quantities p, q, r and s, p:q>r:s if there are positive integers m and n so that np>mq and nr≤ms.
As with definition 3, definition 8 is regarded by some as being a later insertion by Euclid's editors. It defines three terms p, q and r to be in proportion when p:q∷q:r. This is extended to four terms p, q, r and s as p:q∷q:r∷r:s, and so on. Sequences that have the property that the ratios of consecutive terms are equal are called geometric progressions. Definitions 9 and 10 apply this, saying that if p, q and r are in proportion then p:r is the duplicate ratio of p:q and if p, q, r and s are in proportion then p:s is the triplicate ratio of p:q.
Number of terms and use of fractions
In general, a comparison of the quantities of a two-entity ratio can be expressed as a fraction derived from the ratio. For example, in a ratio of 2:3, the amount, size, volume, or quantity of the first entity is that of the second entity.
If there are 2 oranges and 3 apples, the ratio of oranges to apples is 2:3, and the ratio of oranges to the total number of pieces of fruit is 2:5. These ratios can also be expressed in fraction form: there are 2/3 as many oranges as apples, and 2/5 of the pieces of fruit are oranges. If orange juice concentrate is to be diluted with water in the ratio 1:4, then one part of concentrate is mixed with four parts of water, giving five parts total; the amount of orange juice concentrate is 1/4 the amount of water, while the amount of orange juice concentrate is 1/5 of the total liquid. In both ratios and fractions, it is important to be clear what is being compared to what, and beginners often make mistakes for this reason.
Fractions can also be inferred from ratios with more than two entities; however, a ratio with more than two entities cannot be completely converted into a single fraction, because a fraction can only compare two quantities. A separate fraction can be used to compare the quantities of any two of the entities covered by the ratio: for example, from a ratio of 2:3:7 we can infer that the quantity of the second entity is that of the third entity.
Proportions and percentage ratios
If we multiply all quantities involved in a ratio by the same number, the ratio remains valid. For example, a ratio of 3:2 is the same as 12:8. It is usual either to reduce terms to the lowest common denominator, or to express them in parts per hundred (percent).
If a mixture contains substances A, B, C and D in the ratio 5:9:4:2 then there are 5 parts of A for every 9 parts of B, 4 parts of C and 2 parts of D. As 5+9+4+2=20, the total mixture contains 5/20 of A (5 parts out of 20), 9/20 of B, 4/20 of C, and 2/20 of D. If we divide all numbers by the total and multiply by 100, we have converted to percentages: 25% A, 45% B, 20% C, and 10% D (equivalent to writing the ratio as 25:45:20:10).
If the two or more ratio quantities encompass all of the quantities in a particular situation, it is said that "the whole" contains the sum of the parts: for example, a fruit basket containing two apples and three oranges and no other fruit is made up of two parts apples and three parts oranges. In this case, , or 40% of the whole is apples and , or 60% of the whole is oranges. This comparison of a specific quantity to "the whole" is called a proportion.
If the ratio consists of only two values, it can be represented as a fraction, in particular as a decimal fraction. For example, older televisions have a 4:3 aspect ratio, which means that the width is 4/3 of the height (this can also be expressed as 1.33:1 or just 1.33 rounded to two decimal places). More recent widescreen TVs have a 16:9 aspect ratio, or 1.78 rounded to two decimal places. One of the popular widescreen movie formats is 2.35:1 or simply 2.35. Representing ratios as decimal fractions simplifies their comparison. When comparing 1.33, 1.78 and 2.35, it is obvious which format offers wider image. Such a comparison works only when values being compared are consistent, like always expressing width in relation to height.
Reduction
Ratios can be reduced (as fractions are) by dividing each quantity by the common factors of all the quantities. As for fractions, the simplest form is considered that in which the numbers in the ratio are the smallest possible integers.
Thus, the ratio 40:60 is equivalent in meaning to the ratio 2:3, the latter being obtained from the former by dividing both quantities by 20. Mathematically, we write 40:60 = 2:3, or equivalently 40:60∷2:3. The verbal equivalent is "40 is to 60 as 2 is to 3."
A ratio that has integers for both quantities and that cannot be reduced any further (using integers) is said to be in simplest form or lowest terms.
Sometimes it is useful to write a ratio in the form 1:x or x:1, where x is not necessarily an integer, to enable comparisons of different ratios. For example, the ratio 4:5 can be written as 1:1.25 (dividing both sides by 4) Alternatively, it can be written as 0.8:1 (dividing both sides by 5).
Where the context makes the meaning clear, a ratio in this form is sometimes written without the 1 and the ratio symbol (:), though, mathematically, this makes it a factor or multiplier.
Irrational ratios
Ratios may also be established between incommensurable quantities (quantities whose ratio, as value of a fraction, amounts to an irrational number). The earliest discovered example, found by the Pythagoreans, is the ratio of the length of the diagonal d to the length of a side s of a square, which is the square root of 2, formally Another example is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, which is called π, and is not just an irrational number, but a transcendental number.
Also well known is the golden ratio of two (mostly) lengths a and b, which is defined by the proportion
- or, equivalently
Taking the ratios as fractions and as having the value x, yields the equation
- or
which has the positive, irrational solution Thus at least one of a and b has to be irrational for them to be in the golden ratio. An example of an occurrence of the golden ratio in math is as the limiting value of the ratio of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers: even though all these ratios are ratios of two integers and hence are rational, the limit of the sequence of these rational ratios is the irrational golden ratio.
Similarly, the silver ratio of a and b is defined by the proportion
- corresponding to
This equation has the positive, irrational solution so again at least one of the two quantities a and b in the silver ratio must be irrational.
Odds
Main article: OddsOdds (as in gambling) are expressed as a ratio. For example, odds of "7 to 3 against" (7:3) mean that there are seven chances that the event will not happen to every three chances that it will happen. The probability of success is 30%. In every ten trials, there are expected to be three wins and seven losses.
Units
Ratios may be unitless, as in the case they relate quantities in units of the same dimension, even if their units of measurement are initially different. For example, the ratio one minute : 40 seconds can be reduced by changing the first value to 60 seconds, so the ratio becomes 60 seconds : 40 seconds. Once the units are the same, they can be omitted, and the ratio can be reduced to 3:2.
On the other hand, there are non-dimensionless quotients, also known as rates (sometimes also as ratios). In chemistry, mass concentration ratios are usually expressed as weight/volume fractions. For example, a concentration of 3% w/v usually means 3 g of substance in every 100 mL of solution. This cannot be converted to a dimensionless ratio, as in weight/weight or volume/volume fractions.
Triangular coordinates
The locations of points relative to a triangle with vertices A, B, and C and sides AB, BC, and CA are often expressed in extended ratio form as triangular coordinates.
In barycentric coordinates, a point with coordinates α, β, γ is the point upon which a weightless sheet of metal in the shape and size of the triangle would exactly balance if weights were put on the vertices, with the ratio of the weights at A and B being α : β, the ratio of the weights at B and C being β : γ, and therefore the ratio of weights at A and C being α : γ.
In trilinear coordinates, a point with coordinates x :y :z has perpendicular distances to side BC (across from vertex A) and side CA (across from vertex B) in the ratio x :y, distances to side CA and side AB (across from C) in the ratio y :z, and therefore distances to sides BC and AB in the ratio x :z.
Since all information is expressed in terms of ratios (the individual numbers denoted by α, β, γ, x, y, and z have no meaning by themselves), a triangle analysis using barycentric or trilinear coordinates applies regardless of the size of the triangle.
See also
- Cross ratio
- Dilution ratio
- Displacement–length ratio
- Dimensionless quantity
- Financial ratio
- Fold change
- Interval (music)
- Odds ratio
- Parts-per notation
- Price–performance ratio
- Proportionality (mathematics)
- Ratio distribution
- Ratio estimator
- Rate (mathematics)
- Ratio (Twitter)
- Rate ratio
- Relative risk
- Rule of three (mathematics)
- Scale (map)
- Scale (ratio)
- Sex ratio
- Superparticular ratio
- Slope
References
- New International Encyclopedia
- "Ratios". www.mathsisfun.com. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
- Stapel, Elizabeth. "Ratios". Purplemath. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
- "ISO 80000-1:2022(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General". iso.org. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
- "The quotient of two numbers (or quantities); the relative sizes of two numbers (or quantities)", "The Mathematics Dictionary"
- New International Encyclopedia
- Decimal fractions are frequently used in technological areas where ratio comparisons are important, such as aspect ratios (imaging), compression ratios (engines or data storage), etc.
- Weisstein, Eric W. (2022-11-04). "Colon". MathWorld. Retrieved 2022-11-26.
- "ASCII Punctuation" (PDF). The Unicode Standard, Version 15.0. Unicode, Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-26.
also used to denote division or scale; for that mathematical use 2236 ∶ is preferred
- from the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Heath, p. 126
- New International Encyclopedia
- Belle Group concrete mixing hints
- Penny Cyclopædia, p. 307
- Smith, p. 478
- Heath, p. 112
- Heath, p. 113
- Smith, p. 480
- Heath, reference for section
- "Geometry, Euclidean" Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition p682.
- Heath p.114
- Heath p. 125
- David Ben-Chaim; Yaffa Keret; Bat-Sheva Ilany (2012). Ratio and Proportion: Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9789460917844.
"Velocity" can be defined as the ratio... "Population density" is the ratio... "Gasoline consumption" is measure as the ratio...
- "Ratio as a Rate. The first type defined by Freudenthal, above, is known as rate, and illustrates a comparison between two variables with difference units. (...) A ratio of this sort produces a unique, new concept with its own entity, and this new concept is usually not considered a ratio, per se, but a rate or density.", "Ratio and Proportion: Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers"
Further reading
- "Ratio" The Penny Cyclopædia vol. 19, The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (1841) Charles Knight and Co., London pp. 307ff
- "Proportion" New International Encyclopedia, Vol. 19 2nd ed. (1916) Dodd Mead & Co. pp270-271
- "Ratio and Proportion" Fundamentals of practical mathematics, George Wentworth, David Eugene Smith, Herbert Druery Harper (1922) Ginn and Co. pp. 55ff
- The thirteen books of Euclid's Elements, vol 2. trans. Sir Thomas Little Heath (1908). Cambridge Univ. Press. 1908. pp. 112ff.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - D.E. Smith, History of Mathematics, vol 2 Ginn and Company (1925) pp. 477ff. Reprinted 1958 by Dover Publications.
External links
Fractions and ratios | |||
---|---|---|---|
Division and ratio | |||
Fraction |
| ||