Misplaced Pages

User talk:Headbomb: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:05, 10 November 2010 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,242 edits →Brews at AE: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:10, 22 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,944 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2024/December) (bot 
Line 5: Line 5:
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
}} }}

{{notice|image=Stop hand nuvola.svg|1=<center>'''Welcome to my talkpage!</center>
{|
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|
__TOC__
|
{{notice|image=Stop hand nuvola.svg|1=<center>'''Welcome to my talkpage!'''</center>
* Click to leave me a new message at the '''bottom''' of my talk page. * Click to leave me a new message at the '''bottom''' of my talk page.
* If '''I leave you''' a message on your talk page, please reply there (I usually watch a user talk page for 3 days at least). You can use {{tl|talkback}} to get my attention if I seem to not have noticed your reply, but please reply where I left the message. Likewise if '''you leave me''' a message, I will reply here, and will use {{tl|talkback}} to get your attention if you seem to not have noticed my reply. * If '''I leave you''' a message on your talk page, please reply there. You can put {{tlx|re|Headbomb}} at the start of your message to make sure I see it in case I have unwatched your talk page.
* Likewise if '''you leave me''' a message, I will reply here, and will typically use {{tlx|re|USERNAME}} to get your attention.
* Please use an appropriate level of '''indentation'''.
<center>Headbomb</center> <center>Headbomb</center>
}} }}
{{notice|header=] ]:|{{User:AAlertBot/Status2}}}}
|
{{Signpost-subscription|right}} {{Signpost-subscription|right}}
|-
__TOC__
|}

== Brews ==

Hi. If you see him violating his topic ban again after the block expires, feel free to drop me a line and I'll take care of it. I don't see why you should have to waste your time filling out AE requests over and over again. ] (]) 22:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

:Well two reasons mostly, usually when Brews' involved, you can expect weeks of bureaucratic debates about semantics, procedures, block appeals, wheel wars, ... resulting in an AE request anyway. Going there straightaway is just a time saver. The second reason is that having an AE request with all the details makes it a useful reference for future AE request, as it'll contain the links and details of the case .

:But I'll keep your offer in mind next time. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] / ] / ] / ]}</span> 03:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

== Template:Treehouse of Horror ==

Please weigh in on ], so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, ] (]) 08:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

== Reply to {{tl|su}} feedback on my talk page. ==

Just in case you had not noticed: I replied to your feedback on ]. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;— ] <small>(])</small> 11:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

{{Wb|Book talk:2010 Summer Youth Olympics|Note}}

== banned user ==

Hi. I notice that your last edit at ] was reverted by IP number who happens to be the banned ]. He has been 'harblocked' since that last edit but you should try to become familiar with his contributions, interests and methods as he is likely to reinvent himself again, and again, and again. He also edits articles such as ]. I no longer edit science articles and I can't keep monitoring the situation. ] (]) 01:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

:I'll keep that in mind, but you might want to notify ] (at other relevant WikiProjects) for this to get more attention. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] / ] / ] / ]}</span> 01:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

OK ] (]) 01:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

== Template:Bibleref2c ==

]: Yor last edits of the template broke formatting of pages in which it is included. Please experiment on a copy of the template before finalizing the change, so that the rest of[REDACTED] remains unbroken. ] (]) 15:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

After the template the immediately following text (in ]) looked like this:

Jesus, just before his Passion, during Last Supper, promises to send

I.e., as if extra <CR><space> were inserted. ] (]) 15:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
: ]. Anyway, I checked some others; same issue. Notice this happens when the template is inserted in the middle of a paragraph. I am using Internet Explorer 8 . ] (]) 15:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
::P.S. My[REDACTED] GUI is in this "new features" mode. (I noticed it is a bit buggy.) ] (]) 15:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for quick response. ] (]) 16:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

== Proposed Contribution ==

Well, there is hope. Since sometimes critiques or critique-like articles are allowed in Misplaced Pages, I have something to shoot for. Maybe I'll take a look at the examples you cite. I understand the policies. I am just looking for a way to satisfy them and do what I think I need to do.

I want to use Misplaced Pages because it is well respected and it is frequently consulted by journalists and other professionals. I think something needs to be done about the bias that can be present in the popular media, professional scientific journals and even among Misplaced Pages editors. That is, the consensus can be skewed.

You really have to admit that just by accepting an article for inclusion in Misplaced Pages implies a bias that is contrary to the NPOV policy. Perfect neutrality cannot be achieved, but positive explicit steps can be taken to compensate.

] (]) 17:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

:Yes, we are biased against the non-mainstream. A "criticism of X" type of article can only be written if their is significant and notable criticism of X. If the criticism is mostly done by fringers and quacks, then it is very unlikely that the article will be allowed to remain. A "criticism of black holes" type of article has nearly no chance of being included in the encyclopedia, because the only people who dispute that are relativity deniers and similar fringers/quacks. I don't know what exactly you plan to write, but if your recent posts on various talk pages are any indication, I doubt that I and others will agree that what you want to include meets our content guidelines. You're welcomed to try, but don't be surprised at the result if it turns out differently than you expected. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] / ] / ] / ]}</span> 18:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

== Bibleref2's ==

Thanks for the nice updates to the Bibleref2's.

Here are some items on my "dream sheet." I'd like to share them with you in case any inspire you to apply your talents:

1. In Bibleref2c, it would be nice to have the user's input displayed in the shortest legal abbreviated form according to generally accepted abbreviations. E.g., |Matt|6:33| would become <sup>Mt 6:33</sup> I realize that would require a table lookup, which I don't know how to do in this language.


==Explain==
2. In Bibleref2, it would be nice to have the Book name displayed in full. The user could always override that using the Comment field. Hence, {{Bibleref2|Matt|6:33}} would display as '''Matthew 6:33'''


What are you ? - ] (]) 02:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
3. Eliminate periods and superfluous spaces in any displayed references except comments. Users tend to be inconsistent, sometimes including a period after a book name abbreviation and along comes another user who adds a bibleref2 and omits any period after the abbreviated book name. We would leave them if the user makes the reference a comment.


:Fixing a typo. Not sure why there was a bunch of fffff's. Reverted that part. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 02:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
4. Numbered books remain a problem and presently require a comment to separate the number from the alpha book name. If we get a table lookup working, it would be simple to let the user enter |1Cor| or |1 Cor|. Then, our earlier logic would enter the spelled out version in bibleref2 and correctly abbreviated version in the 2c's.
== CS1 error on ] ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
* A ] error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 00:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)


== Crashy crashy ==
Thanks! ─] (]) 19:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


Looks like AAB crashed, but according to contribs, it actually posted all the report pages including last update but not the status page. It looks like it didn't upload zips. So the next run needs to not download zips so it uses the current local files. If you send me the log file, I might take a look at what crashed. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;<b>∣</b>&nbsp;]</small> 10:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
== Script Request ==


:{{ping|Hellknowz}} log on IRC, i'll send them to you. I had a hard crash (bluescreen) towards the end of the run. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 10:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
{{wb|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject User scripts/Requests|Foo}} <b>] <font size="2.5" face="Arial" color="#66699"><i>]</i></b></font><font size="2.5" face="Apple LiSung" color="#CC6600">]</font> <font size="1.5" face="Lucida Sans" color="#003300">]</font>] 02:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
::You can't send files on IRC anyway, so you'd have to e-mail it. But if it's your PC that crashed, then I don't really need the log. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;<b>∣</b>&nbsp;]</small> 12:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Maybe it's AAB that made it crash? Anyway, the log files stop at
<pre>
...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02) Started processing subscription "WikiProject Sudan"...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02) Subscription "WikiProject Sudan" now waiting on report pages to be processed...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02) Nothing to update for subscription "WikiProject State University System of Florida", not uploading report page
(2025-01-12 08-13-02) Nothing to update for subscription "WikiProject Star Wars", not uploading report page
</pre> &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 12:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


:If your PC crashed, then the bot never got the chance to flush the latest entries to the log. But it wouldn't have anything useful anyway - it's not like I log (or can log) system crashes or even app crashes. If this was caused by the bot (which is very unlikely with C#), I'd need your system crash logs that would have a stack trace to the AAB process. But honestly, it's not worth it unless this is systematic. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;<b>∣</b>&nbsp;]</small> 16:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
== Re: ] ==
::Yeah there's nothing in the crash logs. Nothing before the crash, and after the crash, there's a
::"The system has rebooted without cleanly shutting down first. This error could be caused if the system stopped responding, crashed, or lost power unexpectedly."
::There's abunch of other error/warnings after the reboot, but they're all related to normal post-bluescreen fuckups and other software like AMDRyzenMaster. It's definitely not systematic. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 17:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== Enlighten me, please ==
Hi. Looks good. You might also want to look at ], ], ], and possibly ]. Thanks —] <small>(])</small> 14:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


I'd appreciate knowing why you reverted my re-insertion of the definite article in "Records of the Australian Academy of Science", in the ] article, despite my having provided a source for the correct terminology. ] (]) 07:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
== ] ==
Hey HB, that's a good one! I wish I created that! Best, --] (]) 23:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


:Well, there's ], ], ], ], ... all up for grabs :p. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] / ] / ] / ]}</span> 23:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC) :See {{doi|10.1071/hr9720230052}}. Everywhere, it's '']'', without the 'the'. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 08:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)


::{{tpw}} The publishers themselves are inconsistent: see online without "the", yet they "The first issue of the journal (under the title ''Records of the Australian Academy of Science'')" ! ]] 10:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
::Hmm..., HMMM!!! Best, --] (]) 23:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
:::Being a retired librarian this has piqued my interest: I've emailed the publishers to query their inconsistency! ]] 10:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
::::The British Library has with the "the". It would be lovely to see an actual facsimile printed issue, but Google books isn't offering one! ]] 11:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::. . . All use "the". I agree that it would be nice to see a facsimile of the cover page or a PDF of an article showing a footer with the journal name. Note that the misspells the word "Foreword" on their web page, although it is correct in the downloadable PDF of the Foreword of issue 1, so I would trust their authority less, despite their being the issuer of the publication. – ] (]) 01:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)


== quick note, because it confused me ==
:::I think best I stick with music books! You're doing an amzing job with what you've got going on. Thanks for all you've done (which was a lot) on ] and ]. I don't know why Halls hasn't said thanks; but I am! Best, --] (]) 23:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


] was ] 10 minutes after i ] the link from the signpost article - it was a redlink when it was added <span style="color:#507533">... ] * <small>he/they</small> * ]</span> 19:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== Brews at AE ==


:I'm aware. You didn't do anything wrong. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 19:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello Headbomb. I reviewed your new report at ]. I suggest you might consider withdrawing the report. Though Brews has been skirting the limits in the past, I don't see anything actionable here. His appear benign to me. The theory of relativity was already in the article, so he didn't add that. It is reasonable to be concerned that Brews may not be sincerely trying to stay within the limits, but filing an AE report that isn't very persuasive won't really help the situation. He tried to add the same Fontoura Costa reference also at ], but the editors there did not agree to include it. Allowing the normal editorial process to work at ] seems like the natural thing to do. Thank you, ] (]) 04:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:10, 22 January 2025

User Talk Archives My work Sandbox Resources News Stats

Welcome to my talkpage!
  • Click here to leave me a new message at the bottom of my talk page.
  • If I leave you a message on your talk page, please reply there. You can put {{re|Headbomb}} at the start of your message to make sure I see it in case I have unwatched your talk page.
  • Likewise if you leave me a message, I will reply here, and will typically use {{re|USERNAME}} to get your attention.
Headbomb
User:AAlertBot status:Green tickY Daily run finished without issue! (As of 12:05, 24 Jan 2025 UTC)
The Signpost
15 January 2025

Explain

What are you trying to do here? - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Fixing a typo. Not sure why there was a bunch of fffff's. Reverted that part. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Race and ethnicity in Brazil

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Race and ethnicity in Brazil, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Crashy crashy

Looks like AAB crashed, but according to contribs, it actually posted all the report pages including last update but not the status page. It looks like it didn't upload zips. So the next run needs to not download zips so it uses the current local files. If you send me the log file, I might take a look at what crashed. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 10:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

@Hellknowz: log on IRC, i'll send them to you. I had a hard crash (bluescreen) towards the end of the run. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
You can't send files on IRC anyway, so you'd have to e-mail it. But if it's your PC that crashed, then I don't really need the log. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 12:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Maybe it's AAB that made it crash? Anyway, the log files stop at 

...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02)  Started processing subscription "WikiProject Sudan"...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02)  Subscription "WikiProject Sudan" now waiting on report pages to be processed...
(2025-01-12 08-13-02)  Nothing to update for subscription "WikiProject State University System of Florida", not uploading report page
(2025-01-12 08-13-02)  Nothing to update for subscription "WikiProject Star Wars", not uploading report page

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

If your PC crashed, then the bot never got the chance to flush the latest entries to the log. But it wouldn't have anything useful anyway - it's not like I log (or can log) system crashes or even app crashes. If this was caused by the bot (which is very unlikely with C#), I'd need your system crash logs that would have a stack trace to the AAB process. But honestly, it's not worth it unless this is systematic. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 16:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Yeah there's nothing in the crash logs. Nothing before the crash, and after the crash, there's a
"The system has rebooted without cleanly shutting down first. This error could be caused if the system stopped responding, crashed, or lost power unexpectedly."
There's abunch of other error/warnings after the reboot, but they're all related to normal post-bluescreen fuckups and other software like AMDRyzenMaster. It's definitely not systematic. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Enlighten me, please

I'd appreciate knowing why you reverted my re-insertion of the definite article in "Records of the Australian Academy of Science", in the Paul Wild (Australian scientist) article, despite my having provided a source for the correct terminology. SCHolar44 (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

See doi:10.1071/hr9720230052. Everywhere, it's Records of Australian Academy of Science, without the 'the'. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) The publishers themselves are inconsistent: see Vol 1(1) online without "the", yet they now say "The first issue of the journal (under the title Records of the Australian Academy of Science)" ! PamD 10:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Being a retired librarian this has piqued my interest: I've emailed the publishers to query their inconsistency! PamD 10:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
The British Library has catalogued it with the "the". It would be lovely to see an actual facsimile printed issue, but Google books isn't offering one! PamD 11:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Link to a review of the journal printed in 1969. Australian library record. Another Aussie library record. All use "the". I agree that it would be nice to see a facsimile of the cover page or a PDF of an article showing a footer with the journal name. Note that the publisher's page misspells the word "Foreword" on their web page, although it is correct in the downloadable PDF of the Foreword of issue 1, so I would trust their authority less, despite their being the issuer of the publication. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

quick note, because it confused me

Mario Nawfal was published 10 minutes after i removed the link from the signpost article - it was a redlink when it was added ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm aware. You didn't do anything wrong. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User talk:Headbomb: Difference between revisions Add topic