Revision as of 06:45, 12 November 2010 editGwillhickers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers121,353 edits →In command of ships← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:44, 19 October 2024 edit undoHog Farm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators55,766 edits →Dates of rank: spurious - Porter went from Commander to Acting Rear Admiral in October 1862 (see Symonds "Lincoln and His Admirals", pp. 188-189) | ||
(345 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|United States Navy admiral (1813–1891)}} | |||
{{Dablink|For the Marine officer, see ], for other persons see ]}} | |||
{{Hatnote|For his grandson, the Marine general, see ], for other persons see ]}} | |||
{{redirect|Admiral Porter|the Royal Canadian Navy vice admiral|Henry Porter (Canadian admiral)}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2024}} | |||
{{Infobox military person | {{Infobox military person | ||
| name = David Dixon Porter | | name = David Dixon Porter | ||
| image = |
| image = David Dixon Porter - Mathew Brady's National Photographic Art Gallery (Cropped).jpg | ||
| caption |
| caption = Porter in the 1860s, during the American Civil War | ||
| |
| birth_date = {{birth date|1813|6|8}} | ||
| |
| death_date = {{death date and age|1891|2|13|1813|6|8}} | ||
| placeofburial_label = |
| placeofburial_label = | ||
| |
| birth_place = ], U.S. | ||
| |
| death_place = ], U.S. | ||
| placeofburial = ] | | placeofburial = ], ], U.S. | ||
| nickname = | | nickname = | ||
| allegiance = |
| allegiance = {{flag|Mexico|1823}}<br />{{flag|United States|name=United States of America|1891}} | ||
*{{Flagicon image|U.S. flag (35 stars).svg|size=23px}} ] | |||
| branch = ]<br/>] | |||
| branch = {{navy|Mexico|1823}}<br />{{flag|United States Navy|1891}} | |||
| serviceyears = | |||
*{{flagdeco|United States Navy|1865}} ] | |||
| rank = ] ] | |||
| serviceyears = 1825–1828 (Mexico)<br />1829–1891 (US) | |||
| unit = | |||
| rank = ] (Mexico)<br />] ] (US) | |||
| commands = | |||
| |
| unit = | ||
| commands = ]<br />] | |||
| awards = | |||
| |
| battles = {{tree list}} | ||
*] | |||
| laterwork = | |||
**] | |||
*] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
{{tree list/end}} | |||
| awards = | |||
| relations = ] (father) | |||
| laterwork = ''Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War'' (1885) | |||
| signature = David Dixon Porter signature.svg | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''David Dixon Porter''' (June 8, 1813 – February 13, 1891) was a member of one of the most distinguished families in the history of the |
'''David Dixon Porter''' (June 8, 1813 – February 13, 1891) was a ] ] and a member of one of the most distinguished families in the history of the U.S. Navy. Promoted as the second U.S. Navy officer ever to attain the rank of admiral, after his adoptive brother ], Porter helped improve the Navy as the ] of the ] after significant service in the ]. | ||
Porter began naval service as a midshipman at the age of 10 years under his father, Commodore ], on the frigate {{USS|John Adams|1799|6}}. For the remainder of his life, he was associated with the sea. Porter served in the Mexican War in the attack on the fort at the City of Vera Cruz. At the outbreak of the Civil War, he was part of a plan to hold ], near Pensacola, Florida, for the Union; its execution disrupted the effort to relieve the garrison at ], leading to Sumter's fall. Porter commanded an independent flotilla of mortar boats at the ]. Later, he was advanced to the rank of (acting) rear admiral in command of the Mississippi River Squadron, which cooperated with the army under Major General ] in the ]. After the fall of Vicksburg, he led the naval forces in the difficult ] in Louisiana. Late in 1864, Porter was transferred from the interior to the Atlantic coast, where he led the U.S. Navy in the joint assaults on ], the final significant naval action of the war. | |||
Porter worked to raise the standards of the U.S. Navy in the position of Superintendent of the Naval Academy when it was restored to ]. He initiated reforms in the curriculum to increase professionalism. In the early days of President Grant's administration, Porter was ''de facto'' Secretary of the Navy. When his adoptive brother ] was advanced from rank of vice-admiral to admiral, Porter took his previous position; likewise, when Farragut died, Porter became the second man to hold the newly created rank of admiral. He gathered a corps of like-minded officers devoted to naval reform. | |||
Porter's administration of the Navy Department aroused opposition in Congress, |
Porter's administration of the Navy Department aroused powerful opposition by some in Congress, who forced the Secretary of the Navy ] to resign. His replacement, ], curtailed Porter's power and eased him into semi-retirement in 1875. | ||
==Family== | ==Family== | ||
David Dixon Porter was born in ] on June 8, 1813, |
David Dixon Porter was born in ], on June 8, 1813, to ] and Evalina (Anderson) Porter. The family had strong naval traditions; the elder Porter's father, also named David, had been captain of a Massachusetts vessel in the ], as had his uncle Samuel. In the next generation, David Porter and his brother John entered the fledgling United States Navy and served with distinction during the ]. David Porter was named to the rank of commodore.<ref>Soley, ''Admiral Porter'', p. 3.</ref> | ||
The younger David was one of 10 children, including six boys. His youngest brother Thomas died of ] at the age of ten, contracted when traveling with his father for the Mexican Navy. The surviving five sons all became officers, four in the U.S. Navy: | |||
David and Evalina Porter had 10 children, including six boys. The youngest, Thomas, died of yellow fever at the age of ten. The other five all became officers, four in the US Navy (William, David Dixon, Hambleton, and Henry Ogden), and one, Theodoric, in the US Army. Hambleton died at sea of yellow fever while yet a passed midshipman. Theodoric was killed at Matamoros in the Mexican War; David Dixon later named his second son Theodoric in memory of his brother.<ref>Soley, ''Admiral Porter,'' p. 78. Hearn, ''Admiral Porter,'' pp. 23, 30. West, ''Second Admiral,'' p. 54.</ref><ref>According to contemporary newspaper accounts, Theodoric Porter was the first army officer to be killed in the war.</ref> John Porter was not so prolific, but one of his sons, ], was a major general in the US Army at the time of the Civil War, and a second, Bolton Porter, was lost with his ship {{USS|Levant|1837|6}}.<ref>Soley, ''Admiral Porter,'' p. 78. ''Levant'' disappeared without a trace about the time of the start of the Civil War, but probably sank in a storm rather than because of enemy action.</ref> Their sister Anne, who married her cousin Alexander Porter, provided a son, David Henry Porter, who was killed while captain of a Mexican ship during that nation's struggle for independence from Spain (see below).<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'', p. 18.</ref> | |||
*William | |||
*David Dixon, became the second man promoted to rank of admiral. | |||
*Hambleton, died of ] while a passed midshipman. | |||
*Henry Ogden | |||
*Theodoric, became an officer in the US Army; he was killed at Matamoros in the ].<ref>According to contemporary newspaper accounts, Theodoric Porter was the first army officer to be killed in the war. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715234015/http://www.sallysfamilyplace.com/Wheeler/porter2.htm#Theodoric%20Henry%20Porter%C2%A0|date=July 15, 2011}}</ref> | |||
His uncle John Porter and his wife did not have as many children, but their son ] was a major general in the US Army at the time of the Civil War. Another son, Bolton Porter, was lost with his ship {{USS|Levant|1837|6}} in 1861.<ref>Soley, ''Admiral Porter'', p. 78. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405190332/http://sewellgenealogy.com/p353.htm |date=April 5, 2019 }} ''Levant'' disappeared without a trace about the time of the start of the Civil War, but probably sank in a storm rather than because of enemy action.</ref> His aunt Anne married their cousin Alexander Porter. Their son David Henry Porter became a captain in the Mexican Navy during its struggle for independence (see below).<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'',, p. 18.</ref> The naval tradition continued into later generations of the family's descendants. | |||
The tradition continued into later generations. David Dixon married George Ann ("Georgy") Patterson, daughter of Commodore Daniel T. Patterson.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' p. 35.</ref> Of their four sons, three had military careers. Major David Essex Porter served in the army during the Civil War, but resigned after two years in the peacetime army. Captain Theodoric Porter made his career in the navy. Lieutenant Colonel Carlile Patterson Porter was an officer in the US Marine Corps; his son, ], also served in the Marines, rising to the rank of major general and earning the Medal of Honor. One of their two surviving daughters, Elizabeth, was married to Rear Admiral Leavitt Curtis Logan.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' pp. 310–311. For Logan, see US Navy, Bureau of Naval Personnel, ''Register of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the United States Navy and Marine Corps,'' Government Printing Office (1911), p. 136. Their other surviving daughter, Elena, married Charles H. Campbell, a former army officer who had left the service before their marriage. Son Richard Bache Porter alone had no particular relation to the services.</ref> | |||
In addition to rearing their own children, his parents David and Evalina Porter adopted ]. The boy's mother died in 1808 when he was seven, and his father ], a U.S. naval officer in the American Revolution and friend of David Porter Sr., was unable to care for all his children. Commodore David Porter offered to adopt James, to which the boy and George agreed. In 1811, James started serving a midshipman under Porter in the U.S. Navy, and changed his first name to David. He had a distinguished career as ], serving as the first man to attain the new rank of ], instituted by the U.S. Congress after the American Civil War. | |||
Commodore Porter also had an adoptive son who later was closely associated with the career of David Dixon. In the early years of the nineteenth century, the commodore was stationed at New Orleans, and his father accompanied the family there in his declining years. There, the older David Porter met and became friends with another former naval participant in the ], George Farragut.<ref>Jorge Anthony Magin Farragut, a native of Minorca, had anglicized his first name to George when he immigrated to the New World. See Duffy, ''Lincoln's Admiral,'' p. 3.</ref> In late spring 1808, David Porter Sr. suffered sunstroke, and Farragut took him into his home, where Elizabeth Farragut cared for him. She could not restore him to health, however (he was already weakened by tuberculosis), and he died on June 22, 1808. Perhaps ironically, Elizabeth Farragut died of yellow fever on the same day. Now motherless, the Farragut children were scattered around into the homes of friends and relatives. While he was visiting the family a short time later to express appreciation for the kindness they had shown his father and sympathy for the loss of their wife and mother, Commodore Porter offered to take eight year old James Glasgow Farragut into his own household. Young James readily agreed. Next year, he moved with Porter to Washington, where he met Secretary of the Navy Paul Hamilton and expressed his wish for a midshipman's appointment. Hamilton promised that the appointment would be made as soon as he reached the age of ten; as it happened, the commission came through on December 17, 1810, six months before the boy reached his tenth birthday. When James went to sea soon after with his adoptive father, he changed his name from James to David, and it is as ] that he is remembered.<ref>Duffy, ''Lincoln's Admiral,'' pp. 3–6.</ref> | |||
==Time of training== | ==Time of training== | ||
===In the Mexican Navy=== | ===In the Mexican Navy=== | ||
After a reprimand for an 1824 incident, Commodore David Porter decided to resign from the navy rather than submit. He accepted an offer from the government of Mexico to become their General of Marine – in effect, the commander of their navy.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', p. 17.</ref> He took with him a nephew, David Henry Porter, and his sons, David Dixon and Thomas. The two boys were made midshipmen. Thomas died of yellow fever soon after arriving in Mexico; he was 10. David Dixon, age 12, was not affected by the disease. He was able to serve on the frigate ''Libertad'', where he saw little action, and on the captured merchantman ''Esmeralda'' for a raid on Spanish shipping in Cuban waters.<ref>Although Mexico had been nominally independent since 1821, Spain continued to try to reestablish its sovereignty. The result was a more or less continuous state of low-level war. West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 18–24.</ref> | |||
In 1828, |
In 1828, David Dixon accompanied his cousin, , captain of the brig ''Guerrero'', in another raid. ''Guerrero'', mounting 22 guns, was one of the finest vessels in the small Mexican Navy. Off the coast of Cuba on February 10, 1828, she encountered a flotilla of about fifty schooners, convoyed by Spanish brigs ''Marte'' and ''Amalia.'' Captain Porter elected to attack, and soon forced the flotilla to seek refuge in the harbor at ], {{convert|30|mi|km}} west of Havana. The Spanish 64-gun frigate ''Lealtad'' put to sea. ''Guerrero'' was able to break off the action and escape, but overnight Captain Porter decided to circle back and attack the vessels at Mariel. Intercepted by ''Lealtad'', he could not escape. In the battle, Captain Porter was killed, together with many of his crew; the young midshipman Porter was slightly wounded. He was among the survivors who surrendered and were imprisoned in Havana until they could be exchanged. Commodore Porter chose not to risk his son again, and sent him back to the United States by way of New Orleans.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 24–27.</ref> | ||
==Peacetime navy== | |||
David Dixon Porter obtained an official appointment as midshipman in the |
David Dixon Porter obtained an official appointment as midshipman in the U.S. Navy through his grandfather, US Congressman ]. The appointment was dated February 2, 1829, when he was sixteen years of age; this was somewhat older than many midshipmen, some of whom had been taken in as boys. Due to his relative maturity and experience, greater than that of most naval lieutenants, Porter tended to be cocky and challenge some of his superiors, leading to conflict. Except for intervention by Commodore ], who acted favorably because Porter's father was a hero, his warrant as a midshipman would not have been renewed.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 12–13. The incident is remarkable because Commodore Porter considered Biddle to be one of his personal enemies.</ref> | ||
Porter's last duty as a midshipman was on frigate {{USS|United States|1797|6}}, flagship of Commodore ], |
Porter's last duty as a midshipman was on the frigate {{USS|United States|1797|6}}, flagship of Commodore ], from June 1832 until October 1834. Patterson's family accompanied him, including his daughter, George Ann ("Georgy"). The two young people renewed their acquaintance and became engaged.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 29–33.</ref> After Porter returned home, he completed the examination for ], and soon after was assigned to duty in the Coast Survey. There, his pay was such that he could save enough to marry. | ||
==Marriage and family== | |||
In March 1841, he was advanced in rank to lieutenant, and in April of the next year he was detached from the Coast Survey. He had a brief tour of duty in the Mediterranean, and then he was assigned to the US Navy's Hydrographic Office.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' pp. 37, 38, 40.</ref> | |||
Porter and Georgy Patterson were married on March 10, 1839.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 34–35.</ref> Of their four sons, three had military careers, and their two surviving daughters married men who had military service or were active officers.<ref name="auto">West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 310–311</ref> | |||
* Major David Essex Porter served in the army during the Civil War, but resigned after two years in the peacetime army. | |||
* Captain Theodoric Porter made his career in the navy. | |||
* Lieutenant Colonel Carlile Patterson Porter was an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps; his son, ], also served in the Marines, rising to the rank of major general and earning the ]. | |||
* One of their two surviving daughters, Elizabeth, married ], who achieved the rank of Rear Admiral.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 310–311. For Logan, see U.S. Navy, Bureau of Naval Personnel, ''Register of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the United States Navy and Marine Corps'', Government Printing Office (1911), p. 136.</ref> | |||
* Their other surviving daughter, Elena, married Charles H. Campbell, a former army officer who had left the service before their marriage.<ref name="auto"/> | |||
* Richard Bache Porter was the only child to have no relation to the military services.<ref name="auto"/> | |||
==Advance to officer== | |||
In March 1841, Porter was promoted in rank to lieutenant, and in April of the next year he was detached from the Coast Survey. He had a brief tour of duty in the Mediterranean, and then he was assigned to the U.S. Navy's Hydrographic Office.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 37, 38, 40.</ref> | |||
===Mission to Santo Domingo=== | ===Mission to Santo Domingo=== | ||
In 1846, the era of peace was coming to a close. The United States had annexed the Republic of Texas, and the islands of the Caribbean seemed to be likely targets for further expansion. The Republic of Santo Domingo (the present-day ]) had broken off from the ] in 1844, and the United States State Department needed to determine the new nation's social, political, and economic stability. The suitability of the Bay of Samana for |
In 1846, the era of peace was coming to a close. The United States had annexed the Republic of Texas, and the islands of the Caribbean seemed to be likely targets for further expansion. The Republic of Santo Domingo (the present-day ]) had broken off from the ] in 1844, and the United States State Department needed to determine the new nation's social, political, and economic stability. The suitability of the Bay of Samana for U.S. Navy operations was also of interest. To find out, Secretary of State ] asked Porter to undertake a private investigation. He accepted the assignment, and on March 15, 1846, he left home. He arrived in Santo Domingo after some unexpected delays and spent two weeks mapping the coastline. On May 19, he began a trek through the interior that left him without communication for a month. On June 19, he emerged from the jungle, bitten by insects, but with the information that the State Department wanted. He then discovered that while he was away the United States had gone to war with Mexico.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 21–23.</ref> | ||
==In command of ships== | ==In command of ships== | ||
] ~'' |
] ~ David Dixon Porter ~''}}{{center|Issue of 1937}}]] | ||
===Mexican War=== | ===Mexican War=== | ||
]) in the ].]] | |||
Mexico did not have a real navy, so naval personnel had little opportunity for distinction. Porter served as first lieutenant of the sidewheel gunboat {{USS|Spitfire|1846|6}} under Commander ].<ref>Tattnall, from the state of Georgia, would later serve with some distinction in the Confederate Navy.</ref> ''Spitfire'' was at ] when General ] led the amphibious assault on the city, which was shielded by a series of forts and the ancient Castle of San Juan de Ulloa. Porter had spent many hours exploring the castle when he had been a midshipman in the Mexican Navy, so he was familiar with both its strengths and its weaknesses. He submitted a plan to attack it to Captain Tattnall. Taking eight oarsmen and the ship's gig, he sounded out a channel on the night of March 22–23, 1847, using the experience he had gained with the Coast Survey. The next morning, ''Spitfire'' and other vessels taking part in the bombardment followed the channel that Porter had laid out and took up positions inside the harbor, where they were able to pound the forts and castle. Doing so meant, however, that they had to run by the forts, which was contrary to the orders of Commodore ]. Perry sent signals ordering the vessels to break off the bombardment and return, but Tattnall ordered his men not to look at the commodore's signals. Not until a special messenger came with explicit orders to retire did Maffitt cease firing. Perry appreciated the audacity shown by his subordinates, but did not approve of the way they had disregarded his orders. Henceforth, he kept ''Spitfire'' by his side.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' pp. 46–47.</ref> | |||
Mexico did not have a real navy, so naval personnel had little opportunity for distinction. Porter served as first lieutenant of the sidewheel gunboat {{USS|Spitfire|1846|6}} under Commander ].<ref>Tattnall, from the state of Georgia, would later serve with some distinction in the Confederate Navy.</ref> ''Spitfire'' was at ] when General ] led the amphibious assault on the city, which was shielded by a series of forts and the ancient Castle of San Juan de Ulloa. Porter had spent many hours exploring the castle when he had been a midshipman in the Mexican Navy, so he was familiar with both its strengths and its weaknesses. He submitted a plan to attack it to Captain Tattnall. Taking eight oarsmen and the ship's gig, he sounded out a channel on the night of March 22–23, 1847, using the experience he had gained with the Coast Survey. The next morning, ''Spitfire'' and other vessels taking part in the bombardment followed the channel that Porter had laid out and took up positions inside the harbor, where they were able to pound the forts and castle. Doing so meant, however, that they had to run by the forts, which was contrary to the orders of Commodore ]. Perry sent signals ordering the vessels to break off the bombardment and return, but Tattnall ordered his men not to look at the commodore's signals. Not until a special messenger came with explicit orders to retire did Maffitt cease firing. Perry appreciated the audacity shown by his subordinates, but did not approve of the way they had disregarded his orders. Henceforth, he kept ''Spitfire'' by his side.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 46–47.</ref> | |||
On June 13, 1847, Perry mounted an expedition to capture the interior town of ]. Porter on his own led a charge of 68 sailors to capture the fort defending the city. Perry rewarded him for his initiative by making him captain of ''Spitfire.'' It was his first command. It brought him no advantages, however, as the naval part of the war was essentially over.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 48–49.</ref><ref>Soley, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 58, 67–75.</ref> | |||
===Civilian service=== | ===Civilian service=== | ||
In Washington again following the war, Porter |
In Washington again following the war, Porter saw little chance for professional improvement and none for advancement. In order to gain experience in handling steamships, he took leave of absence from the Navy to command civilian ships. He insisted that his crews submit to the methods of military discipline; his employers were noncommittal about his methods, but they were impressed by the results. They asked him to stay in Australia, but his health and the health of his eldest daughter Georgianne persuaded him to return. Back in the United States, he moved his family from Washington to New York in the hope that the climate would benefit his daughter, but she died shortly after the move. His second daughter, Evalina ("Nina"), also died in the interwar period.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 28–33, 34.</ref> | ||
Once again on active duty, he commanded the storeship {{USS|Supply|1846|6}} in a venture to bring camels to the United States. The project was promoted by Secretary of War ], who thought that the desert animals could be useful for the cavalry in the arid Southwest. ''Supply'' made two successful trips before Secretary Davis left office and the experiment was discontinued.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral |
Once again on active duty, he commanded the storeship {{USS|Supply|1846|6}} in a ] to the United States. The project was promoted by Secretary of War ], who thought that the desert animals could be useful for the cavalry in the arid Southwest. ''Supply'' made two successful trips before Secretary Davis left office and the experiment was discontinued.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 64–68.</ref> | ||
] and ].]] | |||
In 1859, he received an attractive offer from the ] to be captain of a ship then under construction. The offer would be effective when she was complete. He would have accepted, but he was delayed in his departure. Before he could leave, war had broken out again.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' p. 71.</ref> | |||
In 1859, he received an attractive offer from the ] to be captain of a ship then under construction. The offer would be effective when she was complete. He would have accepted, but he was delayed in his departure. Before he could leave, war had broken out again.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', p. 71.</ref> | |||
==Civil War== | ==Civil War== | ||
===''Powhatan'' and the relief of Fort Pickens=== | ===''Powhatan'' and the relief of Fort Pickens=== | ||
{{ |
{{further|Battle of Fort Sumter}} | ||
] | ] | ||
The seceded states<ref>Seven states had seceded by April 1861: South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.</ref> laid claim to the national forts within their boundaries, but they did not make good their claim to Fort Sumter in South Carolina and Forts Pickens, Zachary Taylor, and Jefferson in Florida.<ref>Fort Monroe in Virginia was also retained by the national government, but Virginia was still in the Union at the time of the Fort Sumter crisis.</ref> They soon made it clear that they would use force if necessary to gain possession of Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens. President ] resolved not to cede them without a fight. Secretary of State ], Captain ] of the US Army, and Porter devised a plan for the relief of Fort Pickens. The principal element of their plan required use of the steam frigate {{USS|Powhatan|1850|6}}, which would be commanded by Porter and would carry reinforcements to the fort from New York. Because no one was above suspicion in those days, the plan had to be implemented in complete secrecy; not even Secretary of the Navy ] was to be advised.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
The seceded states<ref>Seven states had seceded by April 1861: South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.</ref> laid claim to the national forts within their boundaries, but they did not make good their claim to Fort Sumter in South Carolina and Forts Pickens, Zachary Taylor, and Jefferson in Florida.<ref>Fort Monroe in Virginia was also retained by the national government, but Virginia was still in the Union at the time of the Fort Sumter crisis.</ref> They soon made it clear that they would use force if necessary to gain possession of Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens. President ] resolved not to cede them without a fight. Secretary of State ], Captain ] of the US Army, and Porter devised a plan for the relief of Fort Pickens. The principal element of their plan required use of the steam frigate {{USS|Powhatan|1850|6}}, which would be commanded by Porter and would carry reinforcements to the fort from New York. Because no one was above suspicion in those days, the plan had to be implemented in complete secrecy; not even Secretary of the Navy ] was to be advised.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 37–40.</ref> | ||
Welles was in the meantime preparing an expedition for the relief of the garrison at Fort Sumter. As he was unaware that ''Powhatan'' would not be available, he included it in his plans. When the other vessels assigned to the effort showed up, the South Carolina troops at Charleston began to bombard Fort Sumter, and the Civil War was on. The relief expedition could only wait outside the harbor. The expedition had little chance to be successful in any case; without the support of the guns on ''Powhatan |
Welles was in the meantime preparing an expedition for the relief of the garrison at Fort Sumter. As he was unaware that ''Powhatan'' would not be available, he included it in his plans. When the other vessels assigned to the effort showed up, the South Carolina troops at Charleston began to bombard Fort Sumter, and the Civil War was on. The relief expedition could only wait outside the harbor. The expedition had little chance to be successful in any case; without the support of the guns on ''Powhatan'', it was completely impotent. The only contribution made by the expedition was to carry the soldiers who had defended Fort Sumter back to the North following their surrender and parole.<ref>Musicant, ''Divided Waters'', pp. 19–26.</ref> | ||
Lincoln did not punish Seward for his part in the incident, so Welles felt that he had no choice but to forgive Porter, whose culpability was less. Later, he reasoned that it had at least a redeeming feature in that Porter, whose loyalty had been suspect, was henceforth firmly attached to the Union. As he wrote,<ref>Welles, ''Diary |
Lincoln did not punish Seward for his part in the incident, so Welles felt that he had no choice but to forgive Porter, whose culpability was less. Later, he reasoned that it had at least a redeeming feature in that Porter, whose loyalty had been suspect, was henceforth firmly attached to the Union. As he wrote,<ref>Welles, ''Diary'', vol. 1, p. 35.</ref> | ||
:"In detaching the Powhatan from the Sumter expedition and giving the command to Porter, Mr. Seward extricated that officer from Secession influences, and committed him at once, and decisively, to the Union cause." | |||
{{blockquote|In detaching the Powhatan from the Sumter expedition and giving the command to Porter, Mr. Seward extricated that officer from Secession influences, and committed him at once, and decisively, to the Union cause.}} | |||
===Mortar fleet at New Orleans and Vicksburg=== | ===Mortar fleet at New Orleans and Vicksburg=== | ||
{{ |
{{further|Battle of Forts Jackson and St. Philip}} | ||
In late 1861, the Navy Department began to develop plans to open the Mississippi River.<ref>Porter claimed for himself much credit for suggesting the target and proposing the tactics to be employed. Other writers state that the principal author was Assistant Navy Secretary ]. Hearn, ''Admiral Porter,'' pp. 69–72.</ref> The first move would be to capture ]. For this Porter, by this time advanced to rank of commander, was given the responsibility of organizing a flotilla of some twenty mortar boats that would participate in the reduction of the forts defending the city from the south. The flotilla was a semi-autonomous part of the ], which was to be commanded by Porter's adoptive brother Captain ].<ref>Hearn, ''Capture of New Orleans,'' pp. 98–101.</ref> | |||
In late 1861, the Navy Department began to develop plans to open the Mississippi River.<ref>Porter claimed for himself much credit for suggesting the target and proposing the tactics to be employed. Other writers state that the principal author was Assistant Navy Secretary ]. Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 69–72.</ref> The first move would be to capture ]. For this Porter, by this time advanced to rank of commander, was given the responsibility of organizing a flotilla of some twenty mortar boats that would participate in the reduction of the forts defending the city from the south. The flotilla was a semi-autonomous part of the ], which was to be commanded by Porter's adoptive brother Captain ].<ref>Hearn, ''Capture of New Orleans'', pp. 98–101.</ref> | |||
The bombardment of Fort Jackson and Fort St. Philip began on April 18, 1862. Porter had opined that two days of concentrated fire would be enough to reduce the forts, but after five days they seemed as strong as ever. The mortars were beginning to run low on ammunition. Farragut, who put little reliance on the mortars anyway, made the decision to bypass the forts on the night of April 24. The fleet successfully ran past the forts; the mortars were left behind, but they bombarded the forts during the passage in order to distract the enemy gunners. Once the fleet was above the forts, nothing significant stood between them and New Orleans; Farragut demanded the surrender of the city, and it fell to his fleet on April 29. The forts were still between him and Porter's mortar fleet, but when the latter again began to pummel Fort Jackson, its garrison mutinied and forced its surrender. Fort St. Philip had to follow suit. Surrender of the two forts was accepted by Commander Porter on April 28.<ref>Hearn,''Capture of New Orleans |
The bombardment of Fort Jackson and Fort St. Philip began on April 18, 1862. Porter had opined that two days of concentrated fire would be enough to reduce the forts, but after five days they seemed as strong as ever. The mortars were beginning to run low on ammunition. Farragut, who put little reliance on the mortars anyway, made the decision to bypass the forts on the night of April 24. The fleet successfully ran past the forts; the mortars were left behind, but they bombarded the forts during the passage in order to distract the enemy gunners. Once the fleet was above the forts, nothing significant stood between them and New Orleans; Farragut demanded the surrender of the city, and it fell to his fleet on April 29. The forts were still between him and Porter's mortar fleet, but when the latter again began to pummel Fort Jackson, its garrison mutinied and forced its surrender. Fort St. Philip had to follow suit. Surrender of the two forts was accepted by Commander Porter on April 28.<ref>Hearn, ''Capture of New Orleans'', pp. 181–186; 204–236; 247–248; 252–253.</ref> | ||
Following orders from the Navy Department, Farragut took his fleet upstream to capture other strongpoints on the river, with the aim of complete possession of the Mississippi. At ] he found that the bluffs were too high to be reached by the guns of his fleet, so he ordered Porter to bring his mortar flotilla up. The mortars suppressed the Rebel artillery well enough that Farragut's ships could pass the batteries at Vicksburg and link up with a Union ] coming down from the north. The city could not be taken, however, without active participation by the army, which did not happen. On July 8, the bombardment ceased when Porter was ordered to Hampton Roads to assist in Major General ]'s ]. A few days later, Farragut followed, and the first attempt to take Vicksburg was over.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
Following orders from the Navy Department, Farragut took his fleet upstream to capture other strongpoints on the river, with the aim of complete possession of the Mississippi. At ] he found that the bluffs were too high to be reached by the guns of his fleet, so he ordered Porter to bring his mortar flotilla up. The mortars suppressed the Rebel artillery well enough that Farragut's ships could pass the batteries at Vicksburg and link up with a Union ] coming down from the north. The city could not be taken, however, without active participation by the army, which did not happen. On July 8, the bombardment ceased when Porter was ordered to Hampton Roads to assist in Major General ]'s ]. A few days later, Farragut followed, and the first attempt to take Vicksburg was over.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 119–137. The Peninsula Campaign was terminated before Porter and his mortars arrived.</ref> | ||
===Acting rear admiral: the Vicksburg |
===Acting rear admiral: the Vicksburg Campaign=== | ||
{{ |
{{further|Vicksburg Campaign}} | ||
] | ] | ||
In the summer of 1862, shortly after Porter left Vicksburg, the |
In the summer of 1862, shortly after Porter left Vicksburg, the U.S. Navy was extensively modified; among the features of the revised organization were a set of officer ranks from ensign to rear admiral that paralleled the ranks in the Army. Among the new ranks created were those of commodore and rear admiral.<ref>Equivalent to present-day rear admiral (lower half) and rear admiral (upper half), respectively.</ref> According to the organization charts, the persons in command of the blockading squadrons were to be rear admirals. Another part of the reorganization transferred the ] from the army to the navy, and retitled it the ]. The change of title implied that it was formally equivalent to the other squadrons, so its commanding officer would likewise be a rear admiral. The problem was that the commandant of the gunboat flotilla, Flag Officer ], had not shown the initiative that the Navy Department wanted, so he had to be removed. He was made rear admiral, but he was recalled to Washington to serve as chief of the ].<ref>Anderson, Bern, ''By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War'' (New York: Knopf, 1962; reprint, Da Capo), p. 137.</ref> | ||
Most of the men who could have replaced Davis were either less suitable or were unavailable because of other assignments, so finally Secretary Welles decided to appoint Porter to the position. He did this despite some doubt. As he wrote in his ''Diary |
Most of the men who could have replaced Davis were either less suitable or were unavailable because of other assignments, so finally Secretary Welles decided to appoint Porter to the position. He did this despite some doubt. As he wrote in his ''Diary'',<ref>Welles, ''Diary'', vol. 1, p. 157.</ref> | ||
:Relieved Davis and appointed D. D. Porter to the Western Flotilla, which is hereafter to be recognized as a squadron. Porter is but a Commander. He has, however, stirring and positive qualities, is fertile in resources, has great energy, excessive and sometimes not over-scrupulous ambition, is impressed with and boastful of his own powers, given to exaggeration in relation to himself, |
:Relieved Davis and appointed D. D. Porter to the Western Flotilla, which is hereafter to be recognized as a squadron. Porter is but a Commander. He has, however, stirring and positive qualities, is fertile in resources, has great energy, excessive and sometimes not over-scrupulous ambition, is impressed with and boastful of his own powers, given to exaggeration in relation to himself, —a Porter infirmity, —is not generous to older and superior living officers, whom he is too ready to traduce, but is kind and patronizing to favorites who are juniors, and generally to official inferiors. Is given to cliquism but is brave and daring like all his family... It is a question, with his mixture of good and bad traits, how he will succeed. | ||
Thus Commander Porter became Acting Rear Admiral Porter without going through the intermediate ranks of captain and commodore. He left Washington for his new command on October 9 and arrived in ] on October 15.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
Thus Commander Porter became Acting Rear Admiral Porter without going through the intermediate ranks of captain and commodore. (He was one of only three US Navy admirals to have been promoted to rear admiral without having first served in the rank of captain. The others being ] and ].) He was assigned to command the Mississippi Squadron and left Washington for his new command on October 9, 1862, and arrived in ], on October 15.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 144–145.</ref> | ||
Secretary of War ] considered Porter "a gas bag ... blowing his own trumpet and stealing credit which belongs to others."<ref>], ''The Civil War in Louisiana'', ]: |
Secretary of War ] considered Porter "a gas bag ... blowing his own trumpet and stealing credit which belongs to others."<ref>], ''The Civil War in Louisiana'', ]: Louisiana State University Press, 1963, {{ISBN|0-8071-0834-0}}, p. 171</ref> Historian ], in his ''The Civil War in Louisiana'', describes Porter as having "possessed the qualities of abundant energy, recklessness, resourcefulness, and fighting spirit needed for the trying role ahead. Porter was assigned the task of aiding General ] in opening the upper Mississippi. The choice of McClernand, a volunteer political general, pleased Porter because he felt that all ] men were 'too self-sufficient, pedantic, and unpractical.'"<ref>Winters, p. 171</ref> | ||
Winters also writes that Porter "revealed a weakness he was to display many times: he belittled a superior officer . He often heaped undue praise upon a subordinate, but rarely could find much to admire in a superior."<ref>Winters, p. 48</ref> | Winters also writes that Porter "revealed a weakness he was to display many times: he belittled a superior officer . He often heaped undue praise upon a subordinate, but rarely could find much to admire in a superior."<ref>Winters, p. 48</ref> | ||
The Army was showing renewed interest in opening the Mississippi River at just this time, and Porter met two men who would have great influence on the campaign. First was Major General ], a man of similar temperament to his own, with whom he immediately formed a particularly strong friendship.<ref>Their friendship lasted until the time of their deaths, one day apart. Porter died on February 13, Sherman on February 14, 1891.</ref> The other was Major General McClernand, whom he just as quickly came to dislike.<ref>Sherman, William T., ''Memoirs'' (New York: D. Appleton, 1891), vol. 1, p. 297.</ref> Later they would be joined by Major General ]; Grant and Porter became friends and worked together quite well, but it was on a more strictly professional level than his relation with Sherman.<ref>Melia, "Porter |
The Army was showing renewed interest in opening the Mississippi River at just this time, and Porter met two men who would have great influence on the campaign. First was Major General ], a man of similar temperament to his own, with whom he immediately formed a particularly strong friendship.<ref>Their friendship lasted until the time of their deaths, one day apart. Porter died on February 13, Sherman on February 14, 1891.</ref> The other was Major General McClernand, whom he just as quickly came to dislike.<ref>Sherman, William T., ''Memoirs'' (New York: D. Appleton, 1891), vol. 1, p. 297.</ref> Later they would be joined by Major General ]; Grant and Porter became friends and worked together quite well, but it was on a more strictly professional level than his relation with Sherman.<ref>Melia, "Porter", p. 232.</ref><ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 155–156.</ref> | ||
Close cooperation between the Army and Navy was vital to the success of the siege of Vicksburg. The most prominent contribution to the campaign was the passage of the batteries at Vicksburg and Grand Gulf by a major part of the Mississippi River Squadron. Grant had asked merely for a few gunboats to shield his troops, but Porter persuaded him to use more than half of his fleet. After nightfall on April 16, 1863, the fleet moved past the batteries. Only one vessel was lost in the ensuing firefight. Six nights later, a similar run past the batteries gave Grant the transports he needed for crossing the river.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
Close cooperation between the Army and Navy was vital to the success of the siege of Vicksburg. The most prominent contribution to the campaign was the passage of the batteries at Vicksburg and Grand Gulf by a major part of the Mississippi River Squadron. Grant had asked merely for a few gunboats to shield his troops, but Porter persuaded him to use more than half of his fleet. After nightfall on April 16, 1863, the fleet moved downstream past the batteries. Only one vessel was lost in the ensuing firefight. Six nights later, a similar run past the batteries gave Grant the transports he needed for crossing the river.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 209–219.</ref> Now south of Vicksburg, Grant at first tried to attack the Rebels through Grand Gulf, and requested Porter to eliminate the batteries there before his troops would be sent across. On April 29, the gunboats spent most of the day bombarding two Confederate forts. They succeeded in silencing the lower of the two, but the upper fort remained. Grant called off the assault and moved downstream to ], where he was able to cross the river unopposed.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 223–225.</ref> | ||
Although the fleet made no major offensive contributions to the campaign after Grand Gulf, it remained important in its secondary role of keeping the blockade against the city. When Vicksburg was besieged, the encirclement was made complete by the Navy's control of the Mississippi and Yazoo Rivers. When it finally fell on July 4, Grant was unstinting in his praise of the assistance he had received from Porter and his men.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
Although the fleet made no major offensive contributions to the campaign after Grand Gulf, it remained important in its secondary role of keeping the blockade against the city. When Vicksburg was besieged, the encirclement was made complete by the Navy's control of the Mississippi and Yazoo Rivers. When it finally fell on July 4 (1863), Grant was unstinting in his praise of the assistance he had received from Porter and his men.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', p. 236.</ref> | ||
For his contribution to the victory, Porter's appointment as "acting" rear admiral was made permanent, dated from July 4.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter |
For his contribution to the victory, Porter's appointment as "acting" rear admiral was made permanent, dated from July 4.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', p. 237.</ref> | ||
===Red River Expedition=== | ===Red River Expedition=== | ||
{{Main|Red River Campaign}} | {{Main|Red River Campaign}} | ||
After the opening of the Mississippi, the ] ], who was in charge of army forces in Louisiana, brought pressure on the Lincoln administration to mount a campaign across Louisiana and into Texas along the line of the Red River. The ostensible purpose was to extend Union control into Texas,<ref>France, already in control of Mexico through its puppet Maximilian, were interested in also claiming Texas, which was of no use to the Confederacy following their defeat at Vicksburg.</ref> but Banks was influenced by numerous speculators to convert the campaign into little more than a raid to seize cotton. Admiral Porter was not in favor; he thought that the next objective of his fleet should be to capture Mobile, but he received direct orders from Washington to cooperate with Banks.<ref>Musicant, ''Divided Waters |
After the opening of the Mississippi, the ] ], who was in charge of army forces in Louisiana, brought pressure on the Lincoln administration to mount a campaign across Louisiana and into Texas along the line of the Red River. The ostensible purpose was to extend Union control into Texas,<ref>France, already in control of Mexico through its puppet Maximilian, were interested in also claiming Texas, which was of no use to the Confederacy following their defeat at Vicksburg.</ref> but Banks was influenced by numerous speculators to convert the campaign into little more than a raid to seize cotton.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Admiral Porter was not in favor; he thought that the next objective of his fleet should be to capture Mobile, but he received direct orders from Washington to cooperate with Banks.<ref>Musicant, ''Divided Waters'', p. 294. West, ''Second Admiral'', p. 244.</ref> | ||
After considerable delays caused by Banks's attention to political rather than military matters, the Red River expedition got under way in early March 1864. From the start, navigation of the river presented as great a problem for Porter and his fleet as did the Confederate army that opposed them. The army under Banks and the navy under Porter did little to cooperate, and instead often became rivals in a race to seize cotton. |
After considerable delays caused by Banks's attention to political rather than military matters, the Red River expedition got under way in early March 1864. From the start, navigation of the river presented as great a problem for Porter and his fleet as did the Confederate army that opposed them. The army under Banks and the navy under Porter did little to cooperate, and instead often became rivals in a race to seize cotton.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Confederate opposition under Major General ]{{efn|A son of former U.S. President ].}} succeeded in keeping them apart by defeating Banks at the ], following which Banks gave up the expedition. From that time on, Porter's primary task was to extricate his fleet. The task was made difficult by falling water levels in the river, but he ultimately got most out, with the help of heroic efforts by some of the soldiers who stayed to protect the fleet.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 254–255, 256–262.</ref> | ||
===Capture of Fort Fisher=== | ===Capture of Fort Fisher=== | ||
] | ] | ||
By late summer 1864, ] was the only port open for running the blockade, and the Navy Department began to plan to close it. Its major defense was ], a massive structure at the New Inlet to the Cape Fear River.<ref>New Inlet was the primary entrance to the river from the Atlantic. Old Inlet was protected by lesser forts. Fonvielle, ''Wilmington Campaign |
By late summer 1864, ], was the only Atlantic port open for ], and the Navy Department began to plan to close it. Its major defense was ], a massive structure at the New Inlet to the Cape Fear River.<ref>New Inlet was the primary entrance to the river from the Atlantic. Old Inlet was protected by lesser forts. Fonvielle, ''Wilmington Campaign'', pp. 43–45.</ref> Secretary Welles believed that the head of the ], Rear Admiral ], was inadequate for the task, so he at first assigned Rear Admiral Farragut to be Lee's replacement. Farragut was too ill to serve, however, so Welles decided to switch Lee with Porter: Lee would command the Mississippi River Squadron, and Porter would come east and prepare for the attack on Fort Fisher.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 270–271.</ref> | ||
The planned attack on Fort Fisher required the cooperation of the army, and the troops were taken from the Army of the James. It was expected that Brigadier General Godfrey Weitzel would command, but Major General ], the |
The planned attack on Fort Fisher required the cooperation of the army, and the troops were taken from the Army of the James. It was expected that Brigadier General Godfrey Weitzel would command, but Major General ], the commander of the ], exercised one of the prerogatives of his position to take over as leader of the expedition. Butler proposed that the fort could be flattened by exploding a ship filled with gunpowder near it, and Porter accepted the idea; if successful, the scheme would avoid a protracted siege or its alternative, a frontal assault. Accordingly, the old steamer {{USS|Louisiana|1861|6}} was packed with powder and blown up in the early morning of December 24, 1864. This had, however, no discernible effect on the fort. Butler brought part of his troops ashore, but he was already convinced that the effort was hopeless, so he removed his force before making an all-out assault.<ref>Hearn, ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 280–281; 286–288.</ref> | ||
Porter, enraged by Butler's timorousness, went to U. S. Grant and demanded that Butler be removed. Grant agreed, and placed Major General ] in charge of a second assault on the fort. The second assault began on January 13, 1865, with unopposed landings and bombardment of the fort by the fleet. Porter imposed new methods of bombardment this time: each ship was assigned a specific target, with intent to destroy the enemy's guns rather than to knock down the walls. They were also to continue firing after the men ashore started their assault; the ships would shift their aim to points ahead of the advancing troops. The bombardment continued for two more days, while Terry got his men into position. On the 15th, frontal assaults on opposite faces by Terry's soldiers on the land side and 2000 sailors and marines on the beach vanquished the fort. This was the last significant naval operation of the war.<ref>Hearn. ''Admiral Porter |
Porter, enraged by Butler's timorousness, went to U. S. Grant and demanded that Butler be removed. Grant agreed, and placed Major General ] in charge of a second assault on the fort. The second assault began on January 13, 1865, with unopposed landings and bombardment of the fort by the fleet. Porter imposed new methods of bombardment this time: each ship was assigned a specific target, with intent to destroy the enemy's guns rather than to knock down the walls. They were also to continue firing after the men ashore started their assault; the ships would shift their aim to points ahead of the advancing troops. The bombardment continued for two more days, while Terry got his men into position. On the 15th, frontal assaults on opposite faces by Terry's soldiers on the land side and 2000 sailors and marines on the beach vanquished the fort. This was the last significant naval operation of the war.<ref>Hearn. ''Admiral Porter'', pp. 294–301.</ref> | ||
===Tour of Richmond=== | |||
]'' 1868 Painting, featuring, from left to right: ] ], ] ], ] ], and ] David Dixon Porter aboard the ] in March 1865. Around a month before Porter's Tour of ]]] | |||
] | |||
By April 1865, the Civil War drawing to a close, U.S. victory in the war was all but guaranteed. After the Confederate capital of Richmond was captured by U.S. forces, Porter toured the city on foot, accompanying U.S. President Abraham Lincoln with several armed bodyguards. He fondly recalled the events in his 1885 book, ''Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War'', where he described witnessing scores of many freed slaves rushing to get a glimpse of Lincoln. They admired the president as a hero and credited him for their emancipation; they were kissing his clothing and singing odes to him: | |||
{{blockquote|text=Twenty years have passed since that event; it is almost too new in history to make a great impression, but the time will come when it will loom up as one of the greatest of man's achievements, and the name of Abraham Lincoln — who of his own will struck the shackles from the limbs of four millions of people — will be honored thousands of years from now as man's name was never honored before. The scene was so touching I hated to disturb it, yet we could not stay there all day; we had to move on; so I requested the patriarch to withdraw from about the President with his companions and let us pass on.|author=David Dixon Porter|source=''Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War'' (1885), pp. 295–296.{{sfn|Porter|1885|pages=295–296}}}} | |||
===Assassination of Abraham Lincoln=== | |||
A few weeks after his visit to Virginia, Lincoln was assassinated. Porter was greatly upset by the news, as he admired Lincoln greatly. Porter said Lincoln was the best man he ever knew and ever would know. He stated that he felt some responsibility for Lincoln's death, feeling that had he been with him that night, he might have prevented his murder.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/incidentsanecdot00portiala|title=Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War|date=1886|author-link=David Dixon Porter|first=David Dixon|last=Porter|pages=318–320|location=New York|publisher=D. Appleton and Company|access-date=March 26, 2016}}</ref> | |||
==Postwar== | ==Postwar== | ||
===Naval |
===U.S. Naval Academy=== | ||
The |
The U.S. Navy was rapidly downsized at the end of the war, and Porter, like most of his contemporaries, had fewer ships to command and no clear purpose. Some feared that at sea he might provoke a foreign war, particularly with Great Britain, because of what he saw as their support for the Confederacy. To make use of his undeniable talents, Secretary Welles appointed him Superintendent of the ] in 1865. The academy, despite having been established to train naval personnel, was neglected and underfunded by Congress, with a reputation for producing cadets who were poorly educated on their duties, prone to misbehavior, and lacking the professionalism expected in the Navy. | ||
Porter resolved to change that; he determined to make the academy the rival of the Military Academy at West Point. The curriculum was revised to reflect the reality of naval life, organized sports were encouraged, discipline was enforced, and even social graces were taught. An honor system was installed, "to send honorable men from this institution into the Navy."<ref>Porter, quoted in Melia, "David Dixon Porter", p. 238.</ref> To be sure that his reforms would remain in place after his departure, he brought to the faculty a group of like-minded men, mostly young officers who had distinguished themselves in the war.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 303–314; Melia, "David Dixon Porter", pp. 237–238.</ref> | |||
===Presidency of U. S. Grant=== | |||
When Porter's friend Ulysses S. Grant became president in 1869, he appointed Philadelphia businessman ] as Secretary of the Navy. Borie had no knowledge of the navy and little desire to learn, so he leaned on Porter for advice that the latter was quite willing to give. In a short time, Borie came to defer to him even on trivial routine matters. Porter used his influence with the secretary to push through several policies to shape the navy as he wanted it; in the process, he made a new set of enemies who either were harmed by his actions or merely resented his blunt methods. Borie was strongly criticized for his failure to control his subordinate, and after three months he resigned. The new secretary, ], promptly curtailed Porter's powers.<ref>Melia, "David Dixon Porter," pp. 240–241. West, ''Second Admiral,'' pp. 317–326.</ref> | |||
===Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant=== | |||
When Porter's friend Ulysses S. Grant became president in 1869, he appointed Philadelphia businessman ] as Secretary of the Navy. Borie had no knowledge of the navy and little desire to learn, so he leaned on Porter for advice that the latter was quite willing to give. In a short time, Borie came to defer to him even on routine matters. Porter used his influence with the secretary to push through several policies to shape the navy as he wanted it; in the process, he made a new set of enemies who either were harmed by his actions or resented his blunt methods. Borie was strongly criticized for his failure to control his subordinate, and after three months he resigned. The new secretary, ], promptly curtailed Porter's powers.<ref>Melia, "David Dixon Porter", pp. 240–241. West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 317–326.</ref> | |||
===Final years=== | ===Final years=== | ||
] | |||
In 1866, the ranks of admiral and vice admiral were created in the US Navy. Naval hero Farragut was named as the nation's first admiral, and Porter became vice admiral at the same time. In 1871, Farragut died, and it was expected that Porter would be promoted to fill the vacancy. Eventually, he did become the second admiral, but it was after much controversy that was provoked by his many enemies. Among them were several very powerful politicians, including some of the political generals he had contended with in the war.<ref>West,''Second Admiral,'' pp. 327–334.</ref> | |||
In 1866, the rank of admiral was created in the U.S. Navy. Naval hero ], Porter's adoptive brother, was selected as the nation's first admiral, and Porter became vice admiral at the same time. In 1870, Farragut died, and it was expected that Porter would be promoted to fill the vacancy. | |||
Eventually, he did become the second admiral, but it was after much controversy that was provoked by his many enemies. Among them were several very powerful politicians, including some of the political generals he had contended with in the war.<ref>West,''Second Admiral'', pp. 327–334.</ref> Porter reached the mandatory retirement age of 62 in June 1875 but was allowed to remain on active duty. | |||
Despite the prestige of the high rank, Porter's eclipse in influence continued. For the last twenty years of his life, he had little to do with the operations of the Navy. Porter turned to writing, producing some naval histories. | |||
On October 4, 1866, Porter was elected a Companion of the Pennsylvania Commandery of the ], a military society of officers who had served in the Union Armed Force during the Civil War, and was assigned insignia number 29.<ref>''Union Blue''. Robert G. Caroon and Dana B. Shoaf. White Mane Books, 2001. p. 328.</ref> Porter resigned from the Loyal Legion and returned his insignia on January 4, 1880.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://archive.org/details/membershiprollap1882mili/page/117/mode/1up|title = Membership roll, April 15, 1865|year = 1882}}</ref> | |||
In 1890 he became the founding president of the District of Columbia Society of the ]. He was assigned national membership number 1801 and District of Columbia Society membership number 1. He served as president of the society until his death the next year. He was also an honorary member of the ]. | |||
After twenty years of semi-retirement, his health had begun to give way. In the summer of 1890, he suffered a heart attack; he survived but his health was clearly in decline. He died at the age of 77 on the morning of February 13, 1891.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral'', pp. 335–345.</ref> He had served on active duty in the U.S. Navy for 62 years, having one of the longest careers in the history of the United States Navy. | |||
Admiral Porter is interred at ].<ref>{{cite web|title=David Dixon Porter|url=https://www.nps.gov/people/david-dixon-porter.htm|publisher=National Park Service|access-date=May 25, 2018|archive-date=May 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180526185919/https://www.nps.gov/people/david-dixon-porter.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Dates of rank== | |||
Despite the prestige of the high rank, his eclipse continued. For the last twenty years of his life, he had little to do with the operations of the navy. He turned to writing, producing some histories that are of doubtful reliability but provide insights into his own beliefs and character. He also wrote some fiction of a sort that has not withstood the test of time. After twenty years of semi-retirement, his health began to give way. In the summer of 1890 he suffered a heart attack; he survived but was clearly in decline. He died on the morning of February 13, 1891.<ref>West, ''Second Admiral,'' pp. 335–345.</ref> | |||
*Midshipman – February 2, 1829 | |||
*Passed midshipman – July 3, 1835 | |||
*Lieutenant – February 27, 1841 | |||
*Commander – April 22, 1861 | |||
*Acting rear admiral – circa late 1862 | |||
*Rear admiral – July 4, 1863 | |||
*Vice admiral – July 25, 1866 | |||
*Admiral – August 15, 1870 <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://americancivilwarhighcommand.com/navies/flag-officers-union-navy/|title=Flag Officers Union Navy|date=June 25, 2020|accessdate=March 11, 2023|archive-date=March 6, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230306014353/https://americancivilwarhighcommand.com/navies/flag-officers-union-navy/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== |
==Books== | ||
* ''Memoir of Commodore David Porter, of the United States Navy'' Albany, NY: J. Munsell (1875). | |||
Admiral Porter wrote several books: | |||
* '' |
* ''The Adventures of Harry Marline'' New York: D. Appleton (1885). | ||
* ''The Adventures of Harry Marline.'' New York: D. Appleton (1885). | |||
* ''Allan Dare and Robert le Diable''. New York: D. Appleton (1885). | * ''Allan Dare and Robert le Diable''. New York: D. Appleton (1885). | ||
* ''Arthur Merton, a Romance''. New York: D. Appleton (1889) | * ''Arthur Merton, a Romance''. New York: D. Appleton (1889) | ||
* | * (1885) | ||
* |
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=David Dixon |title=The Naval History of the Civil War |author-link=David Dixon Porter |publisher=New York, The Sherman Pub. Company |year=1886 |url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924032779385}} | ||
* ''High Old Salts: Stories Intended for the Marines'' (co-author F. Coburn Adams). Washington: s.n. (1876). | * ''High Old Salts: Stories Intended for the Marines'' (co-author F. Coburn Adams). Washington: s.n. (1876). | ||
* ''The Pictorial Battles of the Civil War'' |
* ''The Pictorial Battles of the Civil War'' (La Bree, Ben, editor). New York: Sherman (1885). | ||
==Legacy== | ==Legacy== | ||
Five ships have been named |
*Five U.S. ships have been named {{USS|Porter}} for his father and him. | ||
*Porter Road at the Naval Academy, also known as Officer's Row, was named in his honor. | |||
A memorial to Porter |
*A memorial to Porter was installed at ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nps.gov/vick/historyculture/admiral-david-dixon-porter.htm|title=Admiral David Dixon Porter|location=Vicksburg|work=History and Culture|publisher=National Park Service|access-date=July 18, 2010|archive-date=November 7, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107085201/http://www.nps.gov/vick/historyculture/admiral-david-dixon-porter.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
*A public school in Little Neck, Queens N.Y. was named after Porter, PS 94. | |||
*A portrait of Porter is on the cover of ]'s seventh studio album, ''].'' | |||
* In 1937 the U.S. Post Office issued ] honoring the US Navy and notable naval heroes. David Porter and David Farragut appeared on the 3-cent issue. | |||
] -- ]</big><br>issued February 18, 1937}} ]] | |||
{{clear}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal |
{{Portal|Biography|American Civil War}} | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] (Naval commander who also served in naval operations in the ]) | |||
*], for an account of the naval bombardment of the forts south of New Orleans | |||
* ] | |||
* ], for an account of the naval bombardment of the forts south of New Orleans | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{ |
{{notelist|30em}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | |||
*Duffy, James P., ''Lincoln's Admiral: the Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut.'' Wiley, 1997. ISBN 0-471-04208-0 | |||
*Fonvielle, Chris E. Jr., ''The Wilmington Campaign: Last Rays of Departing Hope.'' Campbell, CA: Savas, 1997. ISBN 1-882810-09-0 | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
*Hearn, Chester G., ''The Capture of New Orleans 1862.'' Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1995. ISBN 0-8071-1945-8 | |||
* |
*Duffy, James P., ''Lincoln's Admiral: the Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut.'' Wiley, 1997. pp. 276 {{ISBN|0-471-04208-0}} | ||
*Fonvielle, Chris E. Jr., ''The Wilmington Campaign: Last Rays of Departing Hope.'' Campbell, CA: Savas, 1997. {{ISBN|1-882810-09-0}} | |||
*Hearn, Chester G., ''The Capture of New Orleans 1862.'' Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1995. {{ISBN|0-8071-1945-8}} | |||
*Hearn, Chester G., ''Admiral David Dixon Porter: the Civil War Years.'' Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1996. {{ISBN|1-55750-353-2}} | |||
*Lewis, Paul, ''Yankee Admiral: a Biography of David Dixon Porter.'' David McKay Co., 1968. | *Lewis, Paul, ''Yankee Admiral: a Biography of David Dixon Porter.'' David McKay Co., 1968. | ||
*Melia, Tamara Moser, "David Dixon Porter: Fighting Sailor |
*Melia, Tamara Moser, "David Dixon Porter: Fighting Sailor", in Bradford, James C. (ed.), ''Captains of the Old Steam Navy: Makers of the American Naval Tradition, 1840–1880.'' Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1986. {{ISBN|0-87021-013-0}} | ||
*Musicant, Ivan, ''Divided Waters: the Naval History of the Civil War.'' New York: HarperCollins, 1995. ISBN |
*Musicant, Ivan, ''Divided Waters: the Naval History of the Civil War.'' New York: HarperCollins, 1995. {{ISBN|0-06-016482-4}} | ||
*{{Cite book|last=Porter|first=David Dixon|author-link=q:David Dixon Porter|url=https://archive.org/details/incidentsanec00portrich|quote=incidents and anecdotes of the civil war.|title=Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War|date=1885|publisher=D. Appleton and Company|location=New York|access-date=March 10, 2016}} | |||
*Soley, James Russell, ''Admiral Porter.'' New York: D. Appleton, 1903. | |||
*{{Cite book|last=Soley|first=James Russell|title=Admiral Porter|location=New York|publisher=D. Appleton|date=1903}} | |||
*Welles, Gideon, ''The Diary of Gideon Welles'' (Edgar T. Welles, editor). 3 volumes. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1911. | *Welles, Gideon, ''The Diary of Gideon Welles'' (Edgar T. Welles, editor). 3 volumes. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1911. | ||
*West |
*{{Cite book|last=West| first=Richard S. Jr. |title=The Second Admiral: a Life of David Dixon Porter|location=New York|publisher=Coward-McCann|date=1937}} | ||
===Further reading=== | |||
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=David |title=Memoir of Commodore David Porter, of the United States Navy |volume=David Dixon Porter |publisher=Albany, J. Munsell |year=1875 |url=https://archive.org/details/memoircomm00portrich }} | |||
*{{cite book|author-link=q:David Dixon Porter|last=Porter|first=David Dixon|title=The Naval History of the Civil War|date=1886|publisher=McFarland|page=843|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j9R2AAAAMAAJ&q=naval+history}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=David |title=Incidents and anecdotes of the Civil War |volume= |author-link=David Dixon Porter |publisher= New York : D. Appleton and co. |year=1886 |url=https://archive.org/details/incidentsanecdot00portiala }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=David |title=The naval history of the Civil War |volume= |author-link=David Dixon Porter |publisher=New York, The Sherman Publishing Company |year=1886 |url=https://archive.org/details/mythsofnewworld00brinrich }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Butler |first=Benjamin Franklin |title=Statement of facts in relation to Admiral D.D. Porter's claim not to have run away from forts St. Philip and Jackson |volume= |author-link=Benjamin Franklin Butler |publisher=Boston |year=1889 |url=https://archive.org/details/statementoffacts00butl }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=David |title=President Lincoln's entry into Richmond after the evacuation of that place by the Confederates |volume= |publisher=Belford Clarke Company |year=1890 |url=https://archive.org/details/presidentlincoln00port/page/n1/mode/2up }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Homans |first=James Edward |title=Our three admirals, Farragut, Porter, Dewey; an authentic account of the heroic characters, distinguished careers |volume= |publisher=New York, J. T. White & co. |year=1899 |url=https://archive.org/details/ourthreeadmirals00homa }} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* , Wife Of Union Admiral David Dixon Porter | |||
* | |||
{{Sister project links|s=no|v=no|b=no|wikt=no}} | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051203045452/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/pers-us/uspers-p/dd-portr.htm |date=December 3, 2005 }} | |||
* | |||
{{ |
{{S-start}} | ||
{{S-aca}} | {{S-aca}} | ||
{{Succession box| before=]| title=] | years= |
{{Succession box| before=]| title=] | years=1865–1869 | after=]}} | ||
{{ |
{{S-end}} | ||
{{United States Naval Academy superintendents}} | |||
{{American Civil War |collapsed}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{Persondata | |||
|NAME= Porter, David Dixon | |||
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES= | |||
|SHORT DESCRIPTION= ] ] ] | |||
|DATE OF BIRTH= June 8, 1813 | |||
|PLACE OF BIRTH= ] | |||
|DATE OF DEATH= February 13, 1891 | |||
|PLACE OF DEATH= ] | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Porter, David Dixon}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Porter, David Dixon}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:44, 19 October 2024
United States Navy admiral (1813–1891) For his grandson, the Marine general, see David Dixon Porter (Medal of Honor), for other persons see David Porter (disambiguation) "Admiral Porter" redirects here. For the Royal Canadian Navy vice admiral, see Henry Porter (Canadian admiral).
David Dixon Porter | |
---|---|
Porter in the 1860s, during the American Civil War | |
Born | (1813-06-08)June 8, 1813 Chester, Pennsylvania, U.S. |
Died | February 13, 1891(1891-02-13) (aged 77) Washington, D.C., U.S. |
Buried | Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington County, Virginia, U.S. |
Allegiance | Mexico United States of America |
Service | Mexican Navy United States Navy |
Years of service | 1825–1828 (Mexico) 1829–1891 (US) |
Rank | Midshipman (Mexico) Admiral (US) |
Commands | Superintendent of the U.S. Naval Academy Board of Inspection |
Battles / wars | |
Relations | David Porter (father) |
Other work | Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War (1885) |
Signature |
David Dixon Porter (June 8, 1813 – February 13, 1891) was a United States Navy admiral and a member of one of the most distinguished families in the history of the U.S. Navy. Promoted as the second U.S. Navy officer ever to attain the rank of admiral, after his adoptive brother David G. Farragut, Porter helped improve the Navy as the Superintendent of the U.S. Naval Academy after significant service in the American Civil War.
Porter began naval service as a midshipman at the age of 10 years under his father, Commodore David Porter, on the frigate USS John Adams. For the remainder of his life, he was associated with the sea. Porter served in the Mexican War in the attack on the fort at the City of Vera Cruz. At the outbreak of the Civil War, he was part of a plan to hold Fort Pickens, near Pensacola, Florida, for the Union; its execution disrupted the effort to relieve the garrison at Fort Sumter, leading to Sumter's fall. Porter commanded an independent flotilla of mortar boats at the capture of New Orleans. Later, he was advanced to the rank of (acting) rear admiral in command of the Mississippi River Squadron, which cooperated with the army under Major General Ulysses S. Grant in the Vicksburg Campaign. After the fall of Vicksburg, he led the naval forces in the difficult Red River Campaign in Louisiana. Late in 1864, Porter was transferred from the interior to the Atlantic coast, where he led the U.S. Navy in the joint assaults on Fort Fisher, the final significant naval action of the war.
Porter worked to raise the standards of the U.S. Navy in the position of Superintendent of the Naval Academy when it was restored to Annapolis. He initiated reforms in the curriculum to increase professionalism. In the early days of President Grant's administration, Porter was de facto Secretary of the Navy. When his adoptive brother David G. Farragut was advanced from rank of vice-admiral to admiral, Porter took his previous position; likewise, when Farragut died, Porter became the second man to hold the newly created rank of admiral. He gathered a corps of like-minded officers devoted to naval reform.
Porter's administration of the Navy Department aroused powerful opposition by some in Congress, who forced the Secretary of the Navy Adolph E. Borie to resign. His replacement, George Robeson, curtailed Porter's power and eased him into semi-retirement in 1875.
Family
David Dixon Porter was born in Chester, Pennsylvania, on June 8, 1813, to David Porter and Evalina (Anderson) Porter. The family had strong naval traditions; the elder Porter's father, also named David, had been captain of a Massachusetts vessel in the American Revolutionary War, as had his uncle Samuel. In the next generation, David Porter and his brother John entered the fledgling United States Navy and served with distinction during the War of 1812. David Porter was named to the rank of commodore.
The younger David was one of 10 children, including six boys. His youngest brother Thomas died of yellow fever at the age of ten, contracted when traveling with his father for the Mexican Navy. The surviving five sons all became officers, four in the U.S. Navy:
- William
- David Dixon, became the second man promoted to rank of admiral.
- Hambleton, died of yellow fever while a passed midshipman.
- Henry Ogden
- Theodoric, became an officer in the US Army; he was killed at Matamoros in the Mexican–American War.
His uncle John Porter and his wife did not have as many children, but their son Fitz John Porter was a major general in the US Army at the time of the Civil War. Another son, Bolton Porter, was lost with his ship USS Levant in 1861. His aunt Anne married their cousin Alexander Porter. Their son David Henry Porter became a captain in the Mexican Navy during its struggle for independence (see below). The naval tradition continued into later generations of the family's descendants.
In addition to rearing their own children, his parents David and Evalina Porter adopted James Glasgow Farragut. The boy's mother died in 1808 when he was seven, and his father George Farragut, a U.S. naval officer in the American Revolution and friend of David Porter Sr., was unable to care for all his children. Commodore David Porter offered to adopt James, to which the boy and George agreed. In 1811, James started serving a midshipman under Porter in the U.S. Navy, and changed his first name to David. He had a distinguished career as David G. Farragut, serving as the first man to attain the new rank of admiral, instituted by the U.S. Congress after the American Civil War.
Time of training
In the Mexican Navy
After a reprimand for an 1824 incident, Commodore David Porter decided to resign from the navy rather than submit. He accepted an offer from the government of Mexico to become their General of Marine – in effect, the commander of their navy. He took with him a nephew, David Henry Porter, and his sons, David Dixon and Thomas. The two boys were made midshipmen. Thomas died of yellow fever soon after arriving in Mexico; he was 10. David Dixon, age 12, was not affected by the disease. He was able to serve on the frigate Libertad, where he saw little action, and on the captured merchantman Esmeralda for a raid on Spanish shipping in Cuban waters.
In 1828, David Dixon accompanied his cousin, David Henry Porter, captain of the brig Guerrero, in another raid. Guerrero, mounting 22 guns, was one of the finest vessels in the small Mexican Navy. Off the coast of Cuba on February 10, 1828, she encountered a flotilla of about fifty schooners, convoyed by Spanish brigs Marte and Amalia. Captain Porter elected to attack, and soon forced the flotilla to seek refuge in the harbor at Mariel, 30 miles (48 km) west of Havana. The Spanish 64-gun frigate Lealtad put to sea. Guerrero was able to break off the action and escape, but overnight Captain Porter decided to circle back and attack the vessels at Mariel. Intercepted by Lealtad, he could not escape. In the battle, Captain Porter was killed, together with many of his crew; the young midshipman Porter was slightly wounded. He was among the survivors who surrendered and were imprisoned in Havana until they could be exchanged. Commodore Porter chose not to risk his son again, and sent him back to the United States by way of New Orleans.
Peacetime navy
David Dixon Porter obtained an official appointment as midshipman in the U.S. Navy through his grandfather, US Congressman William Anderson. The appointment was dated February 2, 1829, when he was sixteen years of age; this was somewhat older than many midshipmen, some of whom had been taken in as boys. Due to his relative maturity and experience, greater than that of most naval lieutenants, Porter tended to be cocky and challenge some of his superiors, leading to conflict. Except for intervention by Commodore James Biddle, who acted favorably because Porter's father was a hero, his warrant as a midshipman would not have been renewed.
Porter's last duty as a midshipman was on the frigate USS United States, flagship of Commodore Daniel Patterson, from June 1832 until October 1834. Patterson's family accompanied him, including his daughter, George Ann ("Georgy"). The two young people renewed their acquaintance and became engaged. After Porter returned home, he completed the examination for passed midshipman, and soon after was assigned to duty in the Coast Survey. There, his pay was such that he could save enough to marry.
Marriage and family
Porter and Georgy Patterson were married on March 10, 1839. Of their four sons, three had military careers, and their two surviving daughters married men who had military service or were active officers.
- Major David Essex Porter served in the army during the Civil War, but resigned after two years in the peacetime army.
- Captain Theodoric Porter made his career in the navy.
- Lieutenant Colonel Carlile Patterson Porter was an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps; his son, David Dixon Porter II, also served in the Marines, rising to the rank of major general and earning the Medal of Honor.
- One of their two surviving daughters, Elizabeth, married Leavitt Curtis Logan, who achieved the rank of Rear Admiral.
- Their other surviving daughter, Elena, married Charles H. Campbell, a former army officer who had left the service before their marriage.
- Richard Bache Porter was the only child to have no relation to the military services.
Advance to officer
In March 1841, Porter was promoted in rank to lieutenant, and in April of the next year he was detached from the Coast Survey. He had a brief tour of duty in the Mediterranean, and then he was assigned to the U.S. Navy's Hydrographic Office.
Mission to Santo Domingo
In 1846, the era of peace was coming to a close. The United States had annexed the Republic of Texas, and the islands of the Caribbean seemed to be likely targets for further expansion. The Republic of Santo Domingo (the present-day Dominican Republic) had broken off from the Republic of Haiti in 1844, and the United States State Department needed to determine the new nation's social, political, and economic stability. The suitability of the Bay of Samana for U.S. Navy operations was also of interest. To find out, Secretary of State James Buchanan asked Porter to undertake a private investigation. He accepted the assignment, and on March 15, 1846, he left home. He arrived in Santo Domingo after some unexpected delays and spent two weeks mapping the coastline. On May 19, he began a trek through the interior that left him without communication for a month. On June 19, he emerged from the jungle, bitten by insects, but with the information that the State Department wanted. He then discovered that while he was away the United States had gone to war with Mexico.
In command of ships
Mexican War
Mexico did not have a real navy, so naval personnel had little opportunity for distinction. Porter served as first lieutenant of the sidewheel gunboat USS Spitfire under Commander Josiah Tattnall III. Spitfire was at Vera Cruz when General Winfield Scott led the amphibious assault on the city, which was shielded by a series of forts and the ancient Castle of San Juan de Ulloa. Porter had spent many hours exploring the castle when he had been a midshipman in the Mexican Navy, so he was familiar with both its strengths and its weaknesses. He submitted a plan to attack it to Captain Tattnall. Taking eight oarsmen and the ship's gig, he sounded out a channel on the night of March 22–23, 1847, using the experience he had gained with the Coast Survey. The next morning, Spitfire and other vessels taking part in the bombardment followed the channel that Porter had laid out and took up positions inside the harbor, where they were able to pound the forts and castle. Doing so meant, however, that they had to run by the forts, which was contrary to the orders of Commodore Matthew C. Perry. Perry sent signals ordering the vessels to break off the bombardment and return, but Tattnall ordered his men not to look at the commodore's signals. Not until a special messenger came with explicit orders to retire did Maffitt cease firing. Perry appreciated the audacity shown by his subordinates, but did not approve of the way they had disregarded his orders. Henceforth, he kept Spitfire by his side.
On June 13, 1847, Perry mounted an expedition to capture the interior town of Tabasco. Porter on his own led a charge of 68 sailors to capture the fort defending the city. Perry rewarded him for his initiative by making him captain of Spitfire. It was his first command. It brought him no advantages, however, as the naval part of the war was essentially over.
Civilian service
In Washington again following the war, Porter saw little chance for professional improvement and none for advancement. In order to gain experience in handling steamships, he took leave of absence from the Navy to command civilian ships. He insisted that his crews submit to the methods of military discipline; his employers were noncommittal about his methods, but they were impressed by the results. They asked him to stay in Australia, but his health and the health of his eldest daughter Georgianne persuaded him to return. Back in the United States, he moved his family from Washington to New York in the hope that the climate would benefit his daughter, but she died shortly after the move. His second daughter, Evalina ("Nina"), also died in the interwar period.
Once again on active duty, he commanded the storeship USS Supply in a venture to bring camels to the United States. The project was promoted by Secretary of War Jefferson Davis, who thought that the desert animals could be useful for the cavalry in the arid Southwest. Supply made two successful trips before Secretary Davis left office and the experiment was discontinued.
In 1859, he received an attractive offer from the Pacific Mail Steamship Company to be captain of a ship then under construction. The offer would be effective when she was complete. He would have accepted, but he was delayed in his departure. Before he could leave, war had broken out again.
Civil War
Powhatan and the relief of Fort Pickens
Further information: Battle of Fort SumterThe seceded states laid claim to the national forts within their boundaries, but they did not make good their claim to Fort Sumter in South Carolina and Forts Pickens, Zachary Taylor, and Jefferson in Florida. They soon made it clear that they would use force if necessary to gain possession of Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens. President Abraham Lincoln resolved not to cede them without a fight. Secretary of State William H. Seward, Captain Montgomery C. Meigs of the US Army, and Porter devised a plan for the relief of Fort Pickens. The principal element of their plan required use of the steam frigate USS Powhatan, which would be commanded by Porter and would carry reinforcements to the fort from New York. Because no one was above suspicion in those days, the plan had to be implemented in complete secrecy; not even Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles was to be advised.
Welles was in the meantime preparing an expedition for the relief of the garrison at Fort Sumter. As he was unaware that Powhatan would not be available, he included it in his plans. When the other vessels assigned to the effort showed up, the South Carolina troops at Charleston began to bombard Fort Sumter, and the Civil War was on. The relief expedition could only wait outside the harbor. The expedition had little chance to be successful in any case; without the support of the guns on Powhatan, it was completely impotent. The only contribution made by the expedition was to carry the soldiers who had defended Fort Sumter back to the North following their surrender and parole.
Lincoln did not punish Seward for his part in the incident, so Welles felt that he had no choice but to forgive Porter, whose culpability was less. Later, he reasoned that it had at least a redeeming feature in that Porter, whose loyalty had been suspect, was henceforth firmly attached to the Union. As he wrote,
In detaching the Powhatan from the Sumter expedition and giving the command to Porter, Mr. Seward extricated that officer from Secession influences, and committed him at once, and decisively, to the Union cause.
Mortar fleet at New Orleans and Vicksburg
Further information: Battle of Forts Jackson and St. PhilipIn late 1861, the Navy Department began to develop plans to open the Mississippi River. The first move would be to capture New Orleans. For this Porter, by this time advanced to rank of commander, was given the responsibility of organizing a flotilla of some twenty mortar boats that would participate in the reduction of the forts defending the city from the south. The flotilla was a semi-autonomous part of the West Gulf Blockading Squadron, which was to be commanded by Porter's adoptive brother Captain David G. Farragut.
The bombardment of Fort Jackson and Fort St. Philip began on April 18, 1862. Porter had opined that two days of concentrated fire would be enough to reduce the forts, but after five days they seemed as strong as ever. The mortars were beginning to run low on ammunition. Farragut, who put little reliance on the mortars anyway, made the decision to bypass the forts on the night of April 24. The fleet successfully ran past the forts; the mortars were left behind, but they bombarded the forts during the passage in order to distract the enemy gunners. Once the fleet was above the forts, nothing significant stood between them and New Orleans; Farragut demanded the surrender of the city, and it fell to his fleet on April 29. The forts were still between him and Porter's mortar fleet, but when the latter again began to pummel Fort Jackson, its garrison mutinied and forced its surrender. Fort St. Philip had to follow suit. Surrender of the two forts was accepted by Commander Porter on April 28.
Following orders from the Navy Department, Farragut took his fleet upstream to capture other strongpoints on the river, with the aim of complete possession of the Mississippi. At Vicksburg, Mississippi he found that the bluffs were too high to be reached by the guns of his fleet, so he ordered Porter to bring his mortar flotilla up. The mortars suppressed the Rebel artillery well enough that Farragut's ships could pass the batteries at Vicksburg and link up with a Union flotilla coming down from the north. The city could not be taken, however, without active participation by the army, which did not happen. On July 8, the bombardment ceased when Porter was ordered to Hampton Roads to assist in Major General George B. McClellan's Peninsula Campaign. A few days later, Farragut followed, and the first attempt to take Vicksburg was over.
Acting rear admiral: the Vicksburg Campaign
Further information: Vicksburg CampaignIn the summer of 1862, shortly after Porter left Vicksburg, the U.S. Navy was extensively modified; among the features of the revised organization were a set of officer ranks from ensign to rear admiral that paralleled the ranks in the Army. Among the new ranks created were those of commodore and rear admiral. According to the organization charts, the persons in command of the blockading squadrons were to be rear admirals. Another part of the reorganization transferred the Western gunboat flotilla from the army to the navy, and retitled it the Mississippi River Squadron. The change of title implied that it was formally equivalent to the other squadrons, so its commanding officer would likewise be a rear admiral. The problem was that the commandant of the gunboat flotilla, Flag Officer Charles H. Davis, had not shown the initiative that the Navy Department wanted, so he had to be removed. He was made rear admiral, but he was recalled to Washington to serve as chief of the Bureau of Navigation.
Most of the men who could have replaced Davis were either less suitable or were unavailable because of other assignments, so finally Secretary Welles decided to appoint Porter to the position. He did this despite some doubt. As he wrote in his Diary,
- Relieved Davis and appointed D. D. Porter to the Western Flotilla, which is hereafter to be recognized as a squadron. Porter is but a Commander. He has, however, stirring and positive qualities, is fertile in resources, has great energy, excessive and sometimes not over-scrupulous ambition, is impressed with and boastful of his own powers, given to exaggeration in relation to himself, —a Porter infirmity, —is not generous to older and superior living officers, whom he is too ready to traduce, but is kind and patronizing to favorites who are juniors, and generally to official inferiors. Is given to cliquism but is brave and daring like all his family... It is a question, with his mixture of good and bad traits, how he will succeed.
Thus Commander Porter became Acting Rear Admiral Porter without going through the intermediate ranks of captain and commodore. (He was one of only three US Navy admirals to have been promoted to rear admiral without having first served in the rank of captain. The others being Richard E. Byrd and Ben Moreell.) He was assigned to command the Mississippi Squadron and left Washington for his new command on October 9, 1862, and arrived in Cairo, Illinois, on October 15.
Secretary of War Edwin Stanton considered Porter "a gas bag ... blowing his own trumpet and stealing credit which belongs to others." Historian John D. Winters, in his The Civil War in Louisiana, describes Porter as having "possessed the qualities of abundant energy, recklessness, resourcefulness, and fighting spirit needed for the trying role ahead. Porter was assigned the task of aiding General John A. McClernand in opening the upper Mississippi. The choice of McClernand, a volunteer political general, pleased Porter because he felt that all West Point men were 'too self-sufficient, pedantic, and unpractical.'"
Winters also writes that Porter "revealed a weakness he was to display many times: he belittled a superior officer . He often heaped undue praise upon a subordinate, but rarely could find much to admire in a superior."
The Army was showing renewed interest in opening the Mississippi River at just this time, and Porter met two men who would have great influence on the campaign. First was Major General William T. Sherman, a man of similar temperament to his own, with whom he immediately formed a particularly strong friendship. The other was Major General McClernand, whom he just as quickly came to dislike. Later they would be joined by Major General Ulysses S. Grant; Grant and Porter became friends and worked together quite well, but it was on a more strictly professional level than his relation with Sherman.
Close cooperation between the Army and Navy was vital to the success of the siege of Vicksburg. The most prominent contribution to the campaign was the passage of the batteries at Vicksburg and Grand Gulf by a major part of the Mississippi River Squadron. Grant had asked merely for a few gunboats to shield his troops, but Porter persuaded him to use more than half of his fleet. After nightfall on April 16, 1863, the fleet moved downstream past the batteries. Only one vessel was lost in the ensuing firefight. Six nights later, a similar run past the batteries gave Grant the transports he needed for crossing the river. Now south of Vicksburg, Grant at first tried to attack the Rebels through Grand Gulf, and requested Porter to eliminate the batteries there before his troops would be sent across. On April 29, the gunboats spent most of the day bombarding two Confederate forts. They succeeded in silencing the lower of the two, but the upper fort remained. Grant called off the assault and moved downstream to Bruinsburg, where he was able to cross the river unopposed.
Although the fleet made no major offensive contributions to the campaign after Grand Gulf, it remained important in its secondary role of keeping the blockade against the city. When Vicksburg was besieged, the encirclement was made complete by the Navy's control of the Mississippi and Yazoo Rivers. When it finally fell on July 4 (1863), Grant was unstinting in his praise of the assistance he had received from Porter and his men.
For his contribution to the victory, Porter's appointment as "acting" rear admiral was made permanent, dated from July 4.
Red River Expedition
Main article: Red River CampaignAfter the opening of the Mississippi, the political general Nathaniel P. Banks, who was in charge of army forces in Louisiana, brought pressure on the Lincoln administration to mount a campaign across Louisiana and into Texas along the line of the Red River. The ostensible purpose was to extend Union control into Texas, but Banks was influenced by numerous speculators to convert the campaign into little more than a raid to seize cotton. Admiral Porter was not in favor; he thought that the next objective of his fleet should be to capture Mobile, but he received direct orders from Washington to cooperate with Banks.
After considerable delays caused by Banks's attention to political rather than military matters, the Red River expedition got under way in early March 1864. From the start, navigation of the river presented as great a problem for Porter and his fleet as did the Confederate army that opposed them. The army under Banks and the navy under Porter did little to cooperate, and instead often became rivals in a race to seize cotton. Confederate opposition under Major General Richard Taylor succeeded in keeping them apart by defeating Banks at the Battle of Mansfield, following which Banks gave up the expedition. From that time on, Porter's primary task was to extricate his fleet. The task was made difficult by falling water levels in the river, but he ultimately got most out, with the help of heroic efforts by some of the soldiers who stayed to protect the fleet.
Capture of Fort Fisher
By late summer 1864, Wilmington, North Carolina, was the only Atlantic port open for running the Union blockade, and the Navy Department began to plan to close it. Its major defense was Fort Fisher, a massive structure at the New Inlet to the Cape Fear River. Secretary Welles believed that the head of the North Atlantic Blockading Squadron, Rear Admiral Samuel Phillips Lee, was inadequate for the task, so he at first assigned Rear Admiral Farragut to be Lee's replacement. Farragut was too ill to serve, however, so Welles decided to switch Lee with Porter: Lee would command the Mississippi River Squadron, and Porter would come east and prepare for the attack on Fort Fisher.
The planned attack on Fort Fisher required the cooperation of the army, and the troops were taken from the Army of the James. It was expected that Brigadier General Godfrey Weitzel would command, but Major General Benjamin F. Butler, the commander of the Army of the James, exercised one of the prerogatives of his position to take over as leader of the expedition. Butler proposed that the fort could be flattened by exploding a ship filled with gunpowder near it, and Porter accepted the idea; if successful, the scheme would avoid a protracted siege or its alternative, a frontal assault. Accordingly, the old steamer USS Louisiana was packed with powder and blown up in the early morning of December 24, 1864. This had, however, no discernible effect on the fort. Butler brought part of his troops ashore, but he was already convinced that the effort was hopeless, so he removed his force before making an all-out assault.
Porter, enraged by Butler's timorousness, went to U. S. Grant and demanded that Butler be removed. Grant agreed, and placed Major General Alfred H. Terry in charge of a second assault on the fort. The second assault began on January 13, 1865, with unopposed landings and bombardment of the fort by the fleet. Porter imposed new methods of bombardment this time: each ship was assigned a specific target, with intent to destroy the enemy's guns rather than to knock down the walls. They were also to continue firing after the men ashore started their assault; the ships would shift their aim to points ahead of the advancing troops. The bombardment continued for two more days, while Terry got his men into position. On the 15th, frontal assaults on opposite faces by Terry's soldiers on the land side and 2000 sailors and marines on the beach vanquished the fort. This was the last significant naval operation of the war.
Tour of Richmond
By April 1865, the Civil War drawing to a close, U.S. victory in the war was all but guaranteed. After the Confederate capital of Richmond was captured by U.S. forces, Porter toured the city on foot, accompanying U.S. President Abraham Lincoln with several armed bodyguards. He fondly recalled the events in his 1885 book, Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War, where he described witnessing scores of many freed slaves rushing to get a glimpse of Lincoln. They admired the president as a hero and credited him for their emancipation; they were kissing his clothing and singing odes to him:
Twenty years have passed since that event; it is almost too new in history to make a great impression, but the time will come when it will loom up as one of the greatest of man's achievements, and the name of Abraham Lincoln — who of his own will struck the shackles from the limbs of four millions of people — will be honored thousands of years from now as man's name was never honored before. The scene was so touching I hated to disturb it, yet we could not stay there all day; we had to move on; so I requested the patriarch to withdraw from about the President with his companions and let us pass on.
— David Dixon Porter, Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War (1885), pp. 295–296.
Assassination of Abraham Lincoln
A few weeks after his visit to Virginia, Lincoln was assassinated. Porter was greatly upset by the news, as he admired Lincoln greatly. Porter said Lincoln was the best man he ever knew and ever would know. He stated that he felt some responsibility for Lincoln's death, feeling that had he been with him that night, he might have prevented his murder.
Postwar
U.S. Naval Academy
The U.S. Navy was rapidly downsized at the end of the war, and Porter, like most of his contemporaries, had fewer ships to command and no clear purpose. Some feared that at sea he might provoke a foreign war, particularly with Great Britain, because of what he saw as their support for the Confederacy. To make use of his undeniable talents, Secretary Welles appointed him Superintendent of the Naval Academy in 1865. The academy, despite having been established to train naval personnel, was neglected and underfunded by Congress, with a reputation for producing cadets who were poorly educated on their duties, prone to misbehavior, and lacking the professionalism expected in the Navy.
Porter resolved to change that; he determined to make the academy the rival of the Military Academy at West Point. The curriculum was revised to reflect the reality of naval life, organized sports were encouraged, discipline was enforced, and even social graces were taught. An honor system was installed, "to send honorable men from this institution into the Navy." To be sure that his reforms would remain in place after his departure, he brought to the faculty a group of like-minded men, mostly young officers who had distinguished themselves in the war.
Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant
When Porter's friend Ulysses S. Grant became president in 1869, he appointed Philadelphia businessman Adolph E. Borie as Secretary of the Navy. Borie had no knowledge of the navy and little desire to learn, so he leaned on Porter for advice that the latter was quite willing to give. In a short time, Borie came to defer to him even on routine matters. Porter used his influence with the secretary to push through several policies to shape the navy as he wanted it; in the process, he made a new set of enemies who either were harmed by his actions or resented his blunt methods. Borie was strongly criticized for his failure to control his subordinate, and after three months he resigned. The new secretary, George Robeson, promptly curtailed Porter's powers.
Final years
In 1866, the rank of admiral was created in the U.S. Navy. Naval hero David G. Farragut, Porter's adoptive brother, was selected as the nation's first admiral, and Porter became vice admiral at the same time. In 1870, Farragut died, and it was expected that Porter would be promoted to fill the vacancy.
Eventually, he did become the second admiral, but it was after much controversy that was provoked by his many enemies. Among them were several very powerful politicians, including some of the political generals he had contended with in the war. Porter reached the mandatory retirement age of 62 in June 1875 but was allowed to remain on active duty.
Despite the prestige of the high rank, Porter's eclipse in influence continued. For the last twenty years of his life, he had little to do with the operations of the Navy. Porter turned to writing, producing some naval histories.
On October 4, 1866, Porter was elected a Companion of the Pennsylvania Commandery of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States, a military society of officers who had served in the Union Armed Force during the Civil War, and was assigned insignia number 29. Porter resigned from the Loyal Legion and returned his insignia on January 4, 1880.
In 1890 he became the founding president of the District of Columbia Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. He was assigned national membership number 1801 and District of Columbia Society membership number 1. He served as president of the society until his death the next year. He was also an honorary member of the Society of the Cincinnati.
After twenty years of semi-retirement, his health had begun to give way. In the summer of 1890, he suffered a heart attack; he survived but his health was clearly in decline. He died at the age of 77 on the morning of February 13, 1891. He had served on active duty in the U.S. Navy for 62 years, having one of the longest careers in the history of the United States Navy.
Admiral Porter is interred at Arlington National Cemetery.
Dates of rank
- Midshipman – February 2, 1829
- Passed midshipman – July 3, 1835
- Lieutenant – February 27, 1841
- Commander – April 22, 1861
- Acting rear admiral – circa late 1862
- Rear admiral – July 4, 1863
- Vice admiral – July 25, 1866
- Admiral – August 15, 1870
Books
- Memoir of Commodore David Porter, of the United States Navy Albany, NY: J. Munsell (1875).
- The Adventures of Harry Marline New York: D. Appleton (1885).
- Allan Dare and Robert le Diable. New York: D. Appleton (1885).
- Arthur Merton, a Romance. New York: D. Appleton (1889)
- Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War (1885)
- Porter, David Dixon (1886). The Naval History of the Civil War. New York, The Sherman Pub. Company.
- High Old Salts: Stories Intended for the Marines (co-author F. Coburn Adams). Washington: s.n. (1876).
- The Pictorial Battles of the Civil War (La Bree, Ben, editor). New York: Sherman (1885).
Legacy
- Five U.S. ships have been named USS Porter for his father and him.
- Porter Road at the Naval Academy, also known as Officer's Row, was named in his honor.
- A memorial to Porter was installed at Vicksburg National Military Park.
- A public school in Little Neck, Queens N.Y. was named after Porter, PS 94.
- A portrait of Porter is on the cover of Nitty Gritty Dirt Band's seventh studio album, Will the Circle be Unbroken.
- In 1937 the U.S. Post Office issued five commemorative stamps honoring the US Navy and notable naval heroes. David Porter and David Farragut appeared on the 3-cent issue.
See also
- Bibliography of Naval history of the American Civil War
- Seth Ledyard Phelps (Naval commander who also served in naval operations in the Western Rivers Fleet)
- List of superintendents of the United States Naval Academy
- Joseph Smith Harris, for an account of the naval bombardment of the forts south of New Orleans
Notes
- A son of former U.S. President Zachary Taylor.
References
- Soley, Admiral Porter, p. 3.
- According to contemporary newspaper accounts, Theodoric Porter was the first army officer to be killed in the war. Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- Soley, Admiral Porter, p. 78. Archived April 5, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Levant disappeared without a trace about the time of the start of the Civil War, but probably sank in a storm rather than because of enemy action.
- West, Second Admiral,, p. 18.
- West, Second Admiral, p. 17.
- Although Mexico had been nominally independent since 1821, Spain continued to try to reestablish its sovereignty. The result was a more or less continuous state of low-level war. West, Second Admiral, pp. 18–24.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 24–27.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 12–13. The incident is remarkable because Commodore Porter considered Biddle to be one of his personal enemies.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 29–33.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 34–35.
- ^ West, Second Admiral, pp. 310–311
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 310–311. For Logan, see U.S. Navy, Bureau of Naval Personnel, Register of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the United States Navy and Marine Corps, Government Printing Office (1911), p. 136.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 37, 38, 40.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 21–23.
- Tattnall, from the state of Georgia, would later serve with some distinction in the Confederate Navy.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 46–47.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 48–49.
- Soley, Admiral Porter, pp. 58, 67–75.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 28–33, 34.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 64–68.
- West, Second Admiral, p. 71.
- Seven states had seceded by April 1861: South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.
- Fort Monroe in Virginia was also retained by the national government, but Virginia was still in the Union at the time of the Fort Sumter crisis.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 37–40.
- Musicant, Divided Waters, pp. 19–26.
- Welles, Diary, vol. 1, p. 35.
- Porter claimed for himself much credit for suggesting the target and proposing the tactics to be employed. Other writers state that the principal author was Assistant Navy Secretary Gustavus V. Fox. Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 69–72.
- Hearn, Capture of New Orleans, pp. 98–101.
- Hearn, Capture of New Orleans, pp. 181–186; 204–236; 247–248; 252–253.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 119–137. The Peninsula Campaign was terminated before Porter and his mortars arrived.
- Equivalent to present-day rear admiral (lower half) and rear admiral (upper half), respectively.
- Anderson, Bern, By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War (New York: Knopf, 1962; reprint, Da Capo), p. 137.
- Welles, Diary, vol. 1, p. 157.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 144–145.
- John D. Winters, The Civil War in Louisiana, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963, ISBN 0-8071-0834-0, p. 171
- Winters, p. 171
- Winters, p. 48
- Their friendship lasted until the time of their deaths, one day apart. Porter died on February 13, Sherman on February 14, 1891.
- Sherman, William T., Memoirs (New York: D. Appleton, 1891), vol. 1, p. 297.
- Melia, "Porter", p. 232.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 155–156.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 209–219.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 223–225.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, p. 236.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, p. 237.
- France, already in control of Mexico through its puppet Maximilian, were interested in also claiming Texas, which was of no use to the Confederacy following their defeat at Vicksburg.
- Musicant, Divided Waters, p. 294. West, Second Admiral, p. 244.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 254–255, 256–262.
- New Inlet was the primary entrance to the river from the Atlantic. Old Inlet was protected by lesser forts. Fonvielle, Wilmington Campaign, pp. 43–45.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 270–271.
- Hearn, Admiral Porter, pp. 280–281; 286–288.
- Hearn. Admiral Porter, pp. 294–301.
- Porter 1885, pp. 295–296.
- Porter, David Dixon (1886). Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War. New York: D. Appleton and Company. pp. 318–320. Retrieved March 26, 2016.
- Porter, quoted in Melia, "David Dixon Porter", p. 238.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 303–314; Melia, "David Dixon Porter", pp. 237–238.
- Melia, "David Dixon Porter", pp. 240–241. West, Second Admiral, pp. 317–326.
- West,Second Admiral, pp. 327–334.
- Union Blue. Robert G. Caroon and Dana B. Shoaf. White Mane Books, 2001. p. 328.
- "Membership roll, April 15, 1865". 1882.
- West, Second Admiral, pp. 335–345.
- "David Dixon Porter". National Park Service. Archived from the original on May 26, 2018. Retrieved May 25, 2018.
- "Flag Officers Union Navy". June 25, 2020. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved March 11, 2023.
- "Admiral David Dixon Porter". History and Culture. Vicksburg: National Park Service. Archived from the original on November 7, 2012. Retrieved July 18, 2010.
Bibliography
- Duffy, James P., Lincoln's Admiral: the Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut. Wiley, 1997. pp. 276 ISBN 0-471-04208-0
- Fonvielle, Chris E. Jr., The Wilmington Campaign: Last Rays of Departing Hope. Campbell, CA: Savas, 1997. ISBN 1-882810-09-0
- Hearn, Chester G., The Capture of New Orleans 1862. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1995. ISBN 0-8071-1945-8
- Hearn, Chester G., Admiral David Dixon Porter: the Civil War Years. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1996. ISBN 1-55750-353-2
- Lewis, Paul, Yankee Admiral: a Biography of David Dixon Porter. David McKay Co., 1968.
- Melia, Tamara Moser, "David Dixon Porter: Fighting Sailor", in Bradford, James C. (ed.), Captains of the Old Steam Navy: Makers of the American Naval Tradition, 1840–1880. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1986. ISBN 0-87021-013-0
- Musicant, Ivan, Divided Waters: the Naval History of the Civil War. New York: HarperCollins, 1995. ISBN 0-06-016482-4
- Porter, David Dixon (1885). Incidents and Anecdotes of the Civil War. New York: D. Appleton and Company. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
incidents and anecdotes of the civil war.
- Soley, James Russell (1903). Admiral Porter. New York: D. Appleton.
- Welles, Gideon, The Diary of Gideon Welles (Edgar T. Welles, editor). 3 volumes. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1911.
- West, Richard S. Jr. (1937). The Second Admiral: a Life of David Dixon Porter. New York: Coward-McCann.
Further reading
- Porter, David (1875). Memoir of Commodore David Porter, of the United States Navy. Vol. David Dixon Porter. Albany, J. Munsell.
- Porter, David Dixon (1886). The Naval History of the Civil War. McFarland. p. 843.
- Porter, David (1886). Incidents and anecdotes of the Civil War. New York : D. Appleton and co.
- Porter, David (1886). The naval history of the Civil War. New York, The Sherman Publishing Company.
- Butler, Benjamin Franklin (1889). Statement of facts in relation to Admiral D.D. Porter's claim not to have run away from forts St. Philip and Jackson. Boston.
- Porter, David (1890). President Lincoln's entry into Richmond after the evacuation of that place by the Confederates. Belford Clarke Company.
- Homans, James Edward (1899). Our three admirals, Farragut, Porter, Dewey; an authentic account of the heroic characters, distinguished careers. New York, J. T. White & co.
External links
- Georgy Porter, Wife Of Union Admiral David Dixon Porter
- Images and biography, from the Naval Historical Center, Washington, D.C. Archived December 3, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
- Arlington National Cemetery
Academic offices | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded byGeorge S. Blake | Superintendent of United States Naval Academy 1865–1869 |
Succeeded byJohn L. Worden |
Superintendents of the United States Naval Academy | |
---|---|
|
- 1813 births
- 1891 deaths
- Burials at Arlington National Cemetery
- Commanders of the USS Constitution
- People from Chester, Pennsylvania
- People of the Dominican War of Independence
- People of Pennsylvania in the American Civil War
- Porter family
- Superintendents of the United States Naval Academy
- Union Navy admirals
- United States Navy admirals
- United States Navy personnel of the Mexican–American War